Trustees Create Review Committee I N R E V I E W : by Michael J
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
V o l u m e 6 2 Friday, June 26, 1987 N u m b e r 3 1 Trustees create review committee I n r e v i e w : by Michael J. Coyne Harassment issue explained Of The Triangle At an afternoon press con by Edward Hartnett sion, and I’m sure there will be ference on June 17, the Univer Triangle Staff Writer future occasions, [touched people sity’s Board of Trustees releas without sexual intent.] Human con tact need not have absolute sexual ed a statement concerning the A charge of sexual harassment connotations,” Dr. Gaither said. future presidency of Dr. William was leveled against Dr. Gaither on In the May 7 and later inter S. Gaither. April 24 by a University employee. views, Dr. Gaither maintained that Mr. Robert McClements, The charge referred to an incident he would not resign. He expressed Chairman of the Board of that occurred in Toronto the confidence that the Board of Trustees, read the statement, previous day. Dr. Gaither formal Trustees would not find it in the composed after a three hour ly apologized to the woman who best interests of University to ask discussion at the regularly filed the complaint on the follow forJiis__resignat^^ scheduled June meeting. ing Monday (April 27). The The statement read: woman’s supervisor was also pre In the context of recent events, sent when Dr. Gaither apologized, See Letter from in accordance with Drexel’s draft the Board of Trustees is deter Religious Advisors and mined to follow a careful, policy for handling complaints of thorough and considered ap sexual harassment. Gaither *s response proach in reaching decisions that The incident took place at a on Page 5 will be in the best interests of the business dinner in Toronto on April University. The questions raised 23. According to Vice President of about the presidency involves University Relations Elizibeth O n M ay 13 the W om an’s Studies Committee sponsored a series of matters of grave importance to Gemmill Dr. Gaither touched the workshops for students on the sub the future of the University and Dr. Gaither holds on to presidency leg of the woman three times under ject of sexual harassment. At the its entire family, to the integrity ed decision by the Board no later tions of anonymity. the table during dinner. The woman workshops, which were attended to of the Board and its governance than at its annual organizational He concluded that segment of moved away from Dr. Gaither each capacity and beyond by students, function, and to President meeting in October, 1987. the discussion with the statement, time and finally left the table. Ac various members of the Women’s Gaither, himself The Board, In speaking about the panel, “ The punishment [Dr. Gaither’s cording to Dr. Gaither she did not express any disapproval of his Studies Committee discussed how therefore, intends to undertake a Mr. McClements informed the removal], does not fit the behavior at that time and he learn to handle sexual harassment, the broad and thorough review, press that the review would be crime,” which solicited a sar ed that she was offended only when legal definition of sexual harass through processes to be “ broadening” and would look at castic sigh from the gathered the sexual harassment complaint ment, and Drexel’s draft policy on established promptly by the Dr. Gaither’s “total effec crow d. sexual harassment, which has not Chairman, of the ability and tiveness’’ as president of the Dr. Gaither responded to a was filed. In the midst of pressures from yet been approved by the Board. competence of the president to University. When asked about question regarding other alleged faculty, administrators, and The day ended with a “ Speak- manage effectively and lead the the general “sense” of the incidents of sexual harassment by students demanding the president’s Out” session in Stein Auditorium. University as its chief executive Board, he responded by saying stating, “ Categorically, I have resignation, the Board of Trustees Over 400 students and faculty at officer. The processes fo r this that “No normal vote” was never, ever in my life, inten appointed a six-person committee tended and spoke publically about review will be set in motion im taken, but that it was “ Not the tionally harrassed any females.” to investigate the president's Dr. Gaither’s behavior. Although mediately, and will require the sentiment of the Board to ask for Gaither appeared to be upbeat behavior. Allegations of other there were some who supported input and assistance of many per [D r. G aith er’s] rem o v al.” during the session, despite com possible episodes of sexual harass Dr. Gaither, notably two Powelton sons, including members of the When asked about the earlier ments made by Mrs. Gaither in ment were also to be investigated. Village residents, most condemn faculty, administration, students trustee subcommittee findings, an earlier interview with the The Faculty Council, a body of ed the president’s actions. and alumni, as well as the Board. McClements responded there Philadelphia Inquirer where she eighteen elected faculty members, The Trustee-appointed in Tlw results of this review process were difficulties in releasing in claimed that a request for unanimously passed a resolution vestigatory committee interviewed are to be reported to the Board formation because the witnesses Gaither’s resignation would “ kill demanding Dr. Gaither's resigna faculty members and students and in adequate time fo r an inform- would only speak under condi- h i m . ’ ’ tion on May 5. The Academic reported to the full Board in the Deans submitted a letter to the May 20 meeting. The meeting, Board of Trustees demanding scheduled to be held in the Board “quick and decisive action” and room on the second floor of OSIR’s new methods end lines stating that they could not work MacAlister Hall, was moved wl]en with Dr. Gaither any longer and the Trustees learned that the by.Charlie Browne representative to avoid the wait. the system smoothly. “ Many of asked the Board to remove him. students were planning a protest. Triangle Staff Writer Also on hand were technical sup these people are in here at The W om en’s Studies C om m it Only Dr. Gaither was told of the port people from the Office of 7:00...and are not getting paid for tee, a group of faculty members, move and at 12:30 the second floor The Office of Student Informa Computing Services, which kept working overtime, because there is concerned, in part, with eradicating of MacAlister was packed with tion and Records seems to have the system running, and searched no money in the budget for over sexual discrimination at Drexel, sign-carrying students demanding solved the longtime problem of for ways to make it better. With the time,” Stanley said, adding, “ the submitted a statement to the Board Dr. Gaither’s removal. When in long lines during schedule adjust changes came a tlood of posted OSIR might have to be closed in the deploring “ the recent behavior of formed of the move, students and ment periods, thanks to hard work signs detailing the new procedures. future during the drop/add hours” Dr. William Gaither, which he faculty were outraged at the by the OSIR staff and student sug David Clawson, Associate Direc because of the numbers of staff himself has acknowledged.” B oard’s “ sku lk in g .” gestions, reported Carol Stanley, tor of OSIR, noted that last Friday, people needed to keep the opera Of the incident Dr. Gaither, in a The Trustees did not ask for Director of OSIR. the first drop/add day, “each group tions in the Grand Hall running. May 7 interview, said “ [We were Gaither’s resignation, although four New implementations such as the [of fifty students] was moving The OSIR will analyze the responses to this term’s question at dinner and] my place at the table of the six investigative committee “ deli style” numbering system and through every ten to twelve and my neighbor’s was unusually members recommended that he be the nearby access to representatives minutes,” but noted,“ the real test naires and take the results to the close. There was physical contact removed. Two members of the from the various colleges and of will be the Fall term.” Academic Council, the body during dinner.” Dr. Gaither, while committee have since resigned fices have improved Drop/Add Stanley says that “ solid ideas” responsible for the formulation of stressing that he in no way disputes from the Board. procedures substantially. Any stu from responses to questionnaires policy. If the council decides that the woman’s claim of what oc- In a statement released on May dent with “ Approved Override” or completed in previous terms led to the recommendations are feasible, cured, denies any sexual motivation 21, the Trustees stated: “His “ Drop Only” adjustments only had the new changes, along with the the OSIR will then work to imple for his behavior. “ I have on occa See SUMMARY on Page 2 to hand the forms to an OSIR OSIR staff’s dedication to running ment them . The Triangle Friday, June 26, 1987 around the world assembled on the Parkway for the 8:15 start of the Summary of events race. The favorites for this years race were; 1986 USPRO champion SUMMARY from Page 1 ed incalculable damage to the Thomas Prehn of Boulder, of the (Gaither’s] record of contributions University.” Schwinn/Icy Hot team, Cesare to the University...is well At an open Faculty Council Cipolline of Italy with team Prince, documented.