FY-2020-2021-Budget.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FY-2020-2021-Budget.Pdf Table of Contents Fiscal Year 2020-2021 INTRODUCTION City Manager’s Message…………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 City Council Budget Resolution………………………………………………………………………………………………4 La Puente City Council………………………………………………….…………………………………….…………………..6 Organizational Structure…………………………………………………………………………………………………………7 La Puente at a Glance……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..8 Departmental Indicators…………………………………………………………………………………………………………12 GUIDE TO THE BUDGET What is the Budget?...............................................................................................................................................13 Budget Process……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….14 Fiscal Policies…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..15 Summary of Estimated Fund Balances……..……………………………………………………………………………..16 Personnel Summary………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..18 Budget in Brief………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..19 5-Year Fund Balance Projection……………………………………………………………………………………………...20 REVENUE SUMMARY Revenue Sources…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….21 Revenue Details……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...23 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Budgeted Expenditure by Type……………………………………………………………………………………………..29 Budgeted Expenditure by Fund……………………………………………………………………………………………..31 Gann Appropriations Limit…………………………………………………………………………………………………….35 GENERAL GOVERNMENT City Council….………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………….37 City Manager’s Office…………………………………………………………………………….……………………………...41 City Clerk……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….45 PEG Access Fund…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...49 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Financial Services…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...53 Human Resources/Risk Management…………………………………………………………………………………….57 General Services……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..61 Table of Contents - continued Fiscal Year 2020-2021 PUBLIC SAFETY Public Safety Services……………………………………………………………………………………………….….……………65 Supplemental Law Enforcement……………………………………………………………………….…………..…………..69 JAG Grant Fund……………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………..73 Code Enforcement……………………………………………………………………………………….……………………………77 Emergency Preparedness Services…………………………………………………………………….……………………...81 Animal Services…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………85 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Public Works Services……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….89 Measure W Fund………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………93 AQMD Fund……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..97 Engineering Services……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….101 Streets-Gas Tax Fund………………………………………………………………………………………………………………105 Measure M Fund…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….109 Measure R Fund…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….113 Proposition A Fund………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..117 Proposition C Fund………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..121 Series 2019A Debt Service Fund…………………………………………………………………………………………….125 Series 2019B Debt Service Fund……………………………………………………………………………………………..129 Transportation-Capital Projects Fund……………………………………………………………………………………..133 Planning and Zoning Services…………………………………………………………………………………………………137 Building and Safety Services…………………………………………………………………………………………………...141 Housing and Community Services………………………………………………………………………………………….145 CDBG Fund……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..148 CalHome Fund,……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….150 Parks……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….153 Measure A Safe Parks Fund…………………………………………………………………………………………………….156 Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District Fund……………………………………………………………...158 COMMUNITY SERVICES Recreation Services………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...161 Youth Learning Activity Center……………………………………………………………………………………………….165 Senior Services………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..169 Community Promotions………………………………………………………………………………………………………….173 Table of Contents - continued Fiscal Year 2020-2021 PROPRIETARY FUNDS Sewer………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………177 Equipment Replacement Fund………………………………………………………………………………………………..181 Vehicle Maintenance and Replacement Fund…………………………………………………………………………185 SUCCESSOR AGENCY Successor Agency…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...189 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CIP Overview…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..193 CIP by Project………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….195 CIP by Fund…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….197 Summary of Capital Improvement Projects…………………………………………………………………………….199 DESCRIPTION OF FUNDS Description of Funds………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……201 DEBT SUMMARY Debt Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...205 GLOSSARY Glossary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….207 Glossary of Acronyms………………………………………………………………………………………………………….213 City Manager’s Message Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Dear Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council and Citizens of La Puente, It is with great pleasure that I submit to you the adopted operating budget and capital improvement program for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2021. These documents work in tandem to provide a financial plan for the upcoming year and an authorization for the use of public resources. The combined expenditure budget for all City funds totals $35.4 million, including $12.1 million for capital projects. Like most communities across the nation, La Puente is facing unprecedented economic challenges as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The months-long shuttering of local businesses based on public health guidelines has had an inordinately negative impact on tax revenues, both in the General Fund and Special Revenue Funds. The City is currently facing a substantial reduction in available resources, and the future trajectory of its funding sources remains uncertain. Budgeting in the face of such obstacles has required a sophisticated response by City Council and staff. Working in conjunction with the community, the City has evaluated all categories of expenditures, and has prioritized essential services that keep La Puente safe, healthy, and clean. GENERAL FUND BUDGET The General Fund, which finances the majority of the City’s day-to-day operations, is expected to bear the largest impact of the economic downturn. Sales and Use Tax is projected to experience a 22% decline in the fiscal year 2020-2021. Property Tax, which contributes 40% of the General Fund’s revenue, remains stable at the present time. If recessionary conditions are prolonged and cause a reduction in real estate values, however, this funding source may also generate less revenue. Overall, General Fund revenues are projected to see a 2% decrease from the estimated actual totals for the prior fiscal period. Total operating expenditures in the General Fund are $15,267,400 and capital expenditures are budgeted at $1,404,900. This represents a 8% increase from the budget for fiscal year 2019-2020. Most of this increase is spurred by reallocation of wages and benefits related to maintenance of La Puente Park from the Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District Fund, which has been relied upon heavily in prior years, FY 2020-21 General Fund Revenue $15,267,400 FY 2020-21 General Fund Property Tax $ 6,667,300 Operating Expenditures Sales Tax $ 4,676,500 $15,267,400 Other Tax $ 1,409,100 General Government$ 3,382,300 Licenses & Permits $ 645,500 Public Safety $ 8,451,800 Fines & Forfeitures $ 280,000 Development Services$ 1,570,600 Use of Money $ 120,000 Recreation Services$ 1,792,500 Intergovt $ 67,500 Transfers Out $ 70,200 Charges for Service $ 824,300 Total $ 15,267,400 Other Financing Sources $ 577,200 Total Revenues $ 15,267,400 1 SIGNIFICANT TRENDS • Increase in Public Safety Costs — The City’s most important priority continues to be the safety of our residents, businesses and visitors. With recent gang violence and civic unrest, law enforcement services are more vital than ever. The budget allocation for the Public Safety Services includes a 6% increase in annual costs for the Los Angeles Sheriff Department (LASD) contract. • Changes in Personnel — Total personnel costs for fiscal year 2020-2021 are projected at approximately $6.4 million dollars, which is $1.2 million dollars more than the previous fiscal year and a 8.6% overall increase. Personnel costs represent 18% of total City expenditures, a significantly lower proportion than that of other municipalities. The addition of a full time Park Maintenance Worker position is an investment in the long- term success of the newly renovated La Puente Park. BALANCING THE BUDGET Both City Council policy and prudent management practices dictate that the City adopt a balanced budget each year, in which expenditures do not exceed revenues. Given the declining revenues contained within the fiscal year 2020-2021 budget, several areas were selected for strategic cost reductions, totaling almost $126,000: • Special Events (Community Promotion) - Due to social distancing protocols from public health authorities, many public events may be cancelled. • Special Events (Public Safety) - Reduction in Sheriff Department fees for policing special events. • Contract Services (Public Works) - Reduction in traffic control services for special events. • Community Outreach - Spotlight is published online and available at City facilities - reduced mailing. Fund balance reserves were not utilized for the purpose of balancing this budget, LONG-TERM
Recommended publications
  • Cultural Resources Study for the 1270 Arrow Highway Project
    CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY FOR THE 1270 ARROW HIGHWAY PROJECT IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA APNs 8532-001-002, -006, and -900 Lead Agency: City of Irwindale 5050 Irwindale Avenue Irwindale, California 91706 Preparer: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 ___________________ Signature Project Proponent: Irwindale Partners II, LLC 510 East Foothill Boulevard, Suite 206 San Dimas, California 91773 January 17, 2018 Cultural Resources Study for the 1270 Arrow Highway Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Archaeological Database Information Authors: Andrew J. Garrison and Brian F. Smith Consulting Firm: Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 14010 Poway Road, Suite A Poway, California 92064 (858) 484-0915 Client/Project Proponent: Irwindale Partners II, LLC 510 East Foothill Boulevard, Suite 206 San Dimas, California 91773 Report Date: January 17, 2018 Report Title: Cultural Resources Study for the 1270 Arrow Highway Project, Irwindale, California (APNs 8532-001-002, -006, and -900) Type of Study: Phase I Cultural Resources Study New Site(s): None Updated Site(s): None USGS Quadrangle: Baldwin Park, California (7.5 minute) Acreage: Approximately 79 acres Key Words: Archaeological study; negative; no impacts to cultural resources. i Cultural Resources Study for the 1270 Arrow Highway Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents Section
    [Show full text]
  • Land, Labor, and Livestock the Uses of the Puente Hills Region, 1769-1880
    Land, Labor, and Livestock The Uses of the Puente Hills Region, 1769-1880 John Macias PhD Program in History Claremont Graduate University Claremont, CA 91711 July 2006 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 3 List of Illustrations 4 Introduction 5 The Spanish Era 1769-1821 8 The Mexican Era 1821-1848 16 Impacts on the La Puente Area 19 The American Era 1848-1880 27 Conclusion 37 Bibliography 38 3 Acknowledgments This project could not have been completed without the assistance and guidance from a certain number of people and archives. First of all, I would like to personally thank Mr. Paul R. Spitzzeri, Collections Manager of the Workman and Temple Family Homestead Museum in the City of Industry. Mr. Spitzzeri has not only been resourceful in his knowledge of Rancho La Puente, but his generosity and sincerity in providing key documents was the critical element in describing how the Puente Hills has played a vital part in the history of Southern California. Paul, I can’t thank you enough for this. I would also like to personally thank Ms. Lynn Bremer, Director of the Santa Barbara Mission Archive-Library. Ms. Bremer was kind enough to send me a copy of a letter dated in 1816, which underscores the importance of the Puente Hills area to the missionaries at Mission San Gabriel. I also want to thank Dr. Janet Farrell Brodie of Claremont Graduate University for not only giving me critical feedback on this paper, but the opportunity to even write it. Much gratitude has to be given to the Puente Hills Landfill Habitat Authority for their charitableness in allowing us to write a piece of local history.
    [Show full text]
  • My Seventy Years in California, 1857-1927, by J.A. Graves
    My seventy years in California, 1857-1927, by J.A. Graves MY SEVENTY YEARS IN CALIFORNIA J. A. GRAVES MY SEVENTY YEARS IN CALIFORNIA 1857-1927 By J. A. GRAVES President Farmers & Merchants National Bank of Los Angeles Los Angeles The TIMES-MIRROR Press 1927 COPYRIGHT, 1927 BY J. A. GRAVES My seventy years in California, 1857-1927, by J.A. Graves http://www.loc.gov/resource/calbk.095 LOVINGLY DEDICATED TO MY WIFE ALICE H. GRAVES PREFACE Time flies so swiftly, that I can hardly realize so many years have elapsed since I, a child five years of age, passed through the Golden Gate, to become a resident of California. I have always enjoyed reading of the experiences of California pioneers, who came here either before or after I did. The thought came to me, that possibly other people would enjoy an account of the experiences of my seventy years in the State, during which I participated in the occurrences of a very interesting period of the State's development. As, during all of my life, to think has been to act, this is the only excuse or apology I can offer for this book. J. A. GRAVES. ix CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I FAMILY HISTORY. MARYSVILLE IN 1857. COL. JIM HOWARTH 3 II MARYSVILLE BAR IN 1857. JUDGE STEPHEN J. FIELD ITS LEADER. GEN. GEO. N. ROWE. PLACERVILLE BAR AN ABLE ONE 13 III FARMING IN EARLY DAYS IN CALIFORNIA. HOW WE LIVED. DEMOCRATIC CELEBRATION AT MARYSVILLE DURING THE LINCOLN-MCCLELLAN CAMPAIGN 25 IV SPORT WITH GREYHOUNDS. MY FIRST AND LAST POKER GAME 36 V MOVING FROM MARYSVILLE TO SAN MATEO COUNTY 39 VI HOW WE LIVED IN SAN MATEO COUNTY 43 VII BEGINNING OF MY EDUCATION 46 VIII REV.
    [Show full text]
  • City of La Puente California
    City of La Puente California Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016 City of La Puente California Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016 Prepared by: The Administrative Services Department City of La Puente Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Year Ended June 30, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal i - viii Directory of Officials ix Organization Chart x Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting xi II. FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor’s Report 1 - 3 Management’s Discussion & Analysis 4 - 14 Basic Financial Statements: Government-wide Financial Statements: Statement of Net Position 15 Statement of Activities 16 - 17 Fund Financial Statements: Governmental Funds: Balance Sheet 18 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position 19 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances 20 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 21 Proprietary Funds: Statement of Net Position 22 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 23 Statement of Cash Flows 24 Fiduciary Fund: Statement of Fiduciary Net Position 25 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position 26 Notes to Financial Statements 27 - 57 Required Supplementary Information: Schedule of Funding Progress: Other Post-Employment Benefits Plan 58 Schedule of Proportionate Share of the Net
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Americans and Cityhood Movement in Hacienda Heights in 2003
    Chinese Studies, 2015, 4, 95-109 Published Online November 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/chnstd http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/chnstd.2015.44015 Chinese Americans and Cityhood Movement in Hacienda Heights in 2003 Hung Yu-Ju Chinese Culture University, Taiwan Email: [email protected] Received 4 August 2015; accepted 27 September 2015; published 30 September 2015 Copyright © 2015 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Cityhood incorporation is a common local issue in the American local history regarding different political, social, and economic factors. However, the creation of municipality becomes more con- troversial agenda in certain local regions when suburban ethnic communities are rapidly created by post-1965 immigration. It is reflected by the cityhood movement in Hacienda Heights in 2003, when Chinese/Taiwanese immigrants added ethnic elements in these public and civic activities. This study provides further observation and investigation to the impact that Chinese capitalize on their ethnic and non-ethnic social networks to increase their power in the community-based civic matters, while showing various dimensions on the responses from local multiethnic communities. Keywords Chinese American, Immigration, Ethnoburb, Eastward Migration, San Gabriel Valley, Hacienda Heights, Cityhood Movement, HHIA, HHCA 1. Introduction Since the late nineteenth century, the cityhood movement is a common local phenomenon in the United States with regards to the sharing of local political power by diverse groups, multi-ethnic relationship, local economic growth, as well as the choice of different community-based lifestyles among local people.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents ~ Executive Summary ~ I. Introduction 1 II. Goals and Priorities 1 III. Area Surveyed 2 IV. Research Design 4 V. Methodology 8 VI. Historic Context Statement 10 Architectural Heritage 23 VII. Summary of Survey Results 34 California Historical Resource Status Codes 38 List of West Covina’s Most Significant Resources 40 VIII. References 42 Appendices (Separate from Report) Appendix A – Intensive Survey DPR Forms Appendix B – Reconnaissance Survey DPR Forms Appendix C – Summary of Sunkist Village Potential Historic District and List of Potential Contributors Appendix D – Sunkist Village DPR Forms (Potential Contributors) Appendix E – Sunkist Village DPR Forms (Not Potential Contributors) I. Introduction As part of its long-standing commitment to quality of life and community character, the City of West Covina commissioned an historic resources survey intending to identify and document the existing historic resources in the city built prior to 1946. The survey was conducted by Historic Preservation Partners (HPP)1 and included both a reconnaissance and intensive-level effort. This survey is the first comprehensive inventory of historic resources that has been undertaken. This careful documentation in the form of a survey represents the critical base line of knowledge, which will be required prior to developing policies for historic preservation and related planning objectives. II. Goals and Priorities The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Preservation Planning emphasizes the need to develop goals and priorities in order to effectively identify, evaluate, and register historic properties.2 A survey can be conducted at many different scales and with many different emphases, but the kind of survey undertaken should reflect the needs of the community.3 The goal of this historic resources survey is to provide framework that enables the City of West Covina to move towards consideration of historic resources in its local planning activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Community Member, Living in Hacienda Heights What Can You Do to Improve the Quality of Life in Hacienda Heights? Get Invol
    Community Newsletter • June 2007 Dear Community Member, County Board The County of Los Angeles is pleased to offer you the annual publication of the Hacienda Heights Connection of Supervisors – an information newsletter prepared especially for your community. You live in a community with a wealth of activities and resources. Through the Hacienda Heights Connection, you will find valuable information on County services, as well as community updates. Gloria Molina First District We welcome your input. If you have any comments or suggestions on your Hacienda Heights Connection, please forward them to: Yvonne B. Burke County of Los Angeles-Chief Administrative Office • Office of Unincorporated Area Services and Special Projects Second District (OUAS & SP) • 723 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration • 500 West Temple Street • Los Angeles, California 90012 • Zev Yaroslavsky Or E-mail your comments to:[email protected] Third District Don Knabe Living in Hacienda Heights Fourth District Hacienda Heights is an unincorporated community of approximately 11.4 square miles. As an unincorporated area, municipal services are provided by the County of Los Angeles, including law enforcement, fire suppression, library, road Michael D. Antonovich maintenance, and parks and recreation activities. Fifth District The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors is your “City Council” and is responsible for making policies that affect you. Hacienda Heights, except for a small portion in the First Supervisorial District, (north of Clark Avenue and west of Turnball Canyon), is represented by the Fourth Supervisorial District, which maintains a local office near your community. The information in this guide will help you access the County services you need, however, if you have need additional assistance, please contact the Fourth District Office.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Temple City Historic Resources Survey May 2012 HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP 12 S
    SURVEY REPORT City of Temple City Historic Resources Survey May 2012 HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP 12 S. Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 200, Pasadena, CA 91105-1915 Telephone 626 793 2400, Facsimile 626 793 2401 historicla.com Prepared for City of Temple City 9701 Las Tunas Drive Temple City, CA 91780 Prepared by Historic Resources Group 12 S Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 200 Pasadena, CA 91105 SURVEY REPORT City of Temple City Historic Resources Survey TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 2 Background ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Survey Area ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................. 5 Level of Survey .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Research ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I Cultural Resource Survey for the West Parcel Solar Project, Walnut, Los Angeles County, California
    Phase I Cultural Resource Survey for the West Parcel Solar Project, Walnut, Los Angeles County, California Roberta Thomas, M.A., RPA, and Josh Smallwood, M.A., RPA Prepared By Applied EarthWorks, Inc. 133 N. San Gabriel Blvd, Suite 201 Pasadena, California 91107 Prepared For Larry Sward HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Boulevard, Suite 200 La Mesa, CA 91942 December 2014 National Archaeological Database (NADB) Type of Study: Literature Search, Intensive Pedestrian Survey and Evaluation Cultural Resources Recorded: One historic archaeological site, Æ -2840-1H Sites Revisited and/or Updated: None Isolated Artifacts Recorded: None USGS 7.5’ Quadrangles: San Dimas, CA Acreage: 29 acres Level of Investigation: Section 106 of the NHPA Key Words: Walnut; Los Angeles Basin; Los Angeles County; Section 106; CEQA; Phase 1 survey; 29 acres surveyed; historic-period cattle chute ruins (Æ-2840-1H) MANAGEMENT SUMMARY As part of Mt. San Antonio College’s (Mt. SAC) Facility Master Plan 2012 Project, a 2 megawatt photovoltaic system along the western side of Grand Avenue and 0.06 acre of wetland on the east side of Grand Avenue, within the City of Walnut, Los Angeles County, California were approved and the plan’s attendant Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was approved in 2013. Applied EarthWorks, Inc. (Æ) was retained by HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. (HELIX) to conduct a cultural resource assessment of the Mt. SAC West Parcel Solar subproject (Project) Area of Potential Effects (APE) to include with Mt. SAC’s Section 404 permit application to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This report summarizes the methods and results of an intensive cultural resource investigation of the approximately 28-acre survey area (which includes the 27.65-acre Project area in addition to a thin strip of land on the east side of Grand Avenue) and will provide baseline information on cultural resources that will enable more effective development and planning through early consideration of cultural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B1 Cultural Resources Report
    JM Research and Consulting Jennifer Mermilliod, M.A. 4049 Almond Street, Suite 201 Riverside, CA 92501 Phone 951-233-6897 [email protected] MEMORANDUM DATE: April 5, 2021 TO: Eric Nelson Vice President of Community Development Trumark Homes 450 Newport Center Dr. #300 Newport Beach, CA 92660 FROM: Jennifer Mermilliod, M.A., Principal Historian/Architectural Historian SUBJECT: Cultural Resources Survey for the Vita Pakt Project, Covina, Los Angeles County, California Dear Mr. Nelson, JM Research & Consulting (JMRC) completed a focused Cultural Resources Survey for the Vita Pakt Project, located at 707 N. Barranca Avenue (APN 8430-015-018), which proposes to construct 151 at-grade multi-family residential attached units and associated improvements on an approximately 6-acre site. Planned construction activities include over-excavation within building pad areas to a minimum depth of 5 to 7 feet below existing grade or 3 feet below planned footings, whichever is deeper, with a few, select areas of removal and re-compaction beyond the 5-foot minimum to a maximum of 15 feet. The survey was requested by the City of Covina in compliance with the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Town Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR; November 2019) and in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Specifically, the Cultural Resources Survey was completed in compliance with the following Mitigation Measures (MM) for Cultural and Tribal Resources: Mitigation Measure CUL-2: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, future development projects are required to prepare a Phase I Cultural Resources Technical Report in accordance with the California Office of Historic Preservation: Archaeological Resources Management Report Guidelines, with the purpose to assess, avoid, and mitigate potential impacts to archeological and tribal cultural resources as set forth in CEQA Regulations: Appendix G and as specified in the City of Covina Municipal Code 17.81.
    [Show full text]
  • Solano-Reeve Papers, 1849-C.1910
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf2z09n5sv No online items Inventory of the Solano-Reeve Papers, 1849-c.1910 Processed by The Huntington Library staff; supplementary encoding and revision supplied by Brooke Dykman Dockter. Manuscripts Department The Huntington Library 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2203 Fax: (626) 449-5720 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org/huntingtonlibrary.aspx?id=554 © 2000 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Inventory of the Solano-Reeve 1 Papers, 1849-c.1910 Inventory of the Solano-Reeve Papers, 1849-c.1910 The Huntington Library San Marino, California Contact Information Manuscripts Department The Huntington Library 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2203 Fax: (626) 449-5720 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org/huntingtonlibrary.aspx?id=554 Processed by: The Huntington Library staff © 2000 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Solano-Reeve Papers, Date (inclusive): 1849-c.1910 Creator: Solano, Alfred and Reeve, Sidney B. Extent: 3225 pieces, including over 2100 maps and sketch maps Repository: The Huntington Library San Marino, California 91108 Language: English. Provenance Purchased from Alfred Solano and Anna B. Reeve, May, 1933. Access Collection is open to qualified researchers by prior application through the Reader Services Department. For more information please go to following URL . Publication Rights In order to quote from, publish, or reproduce any of the manuscripts or visual materials, researchers must obtain formal permission from the office of the Library Director. In most instances, permission is given by the Huntington as owner of the physical property rights only, and researchers must also obtain permission from the holder of the literary rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Survey Report for the Emerald Necklace Trails Project Los Angeles County, California
    APPENDIX D Cultural Resources Survey Report for the Emerald Necklace Trails Project Los Angeles County, California By: Roger D. Mason, Ph.D., RPA Prepared for: Withers & Sandgren 20948 Tulsa Street Chatsworth, California 91311 Prepared by: ECORP Consulting, Inc. 1801 Park Court Place, B-103 Santa Ana, California 92701 May 2016 Keywords: Cultural resources records search, CEQA, El Monte, Whittier Narrows, Los Angeles County, USGS El Monte and Baldwin Park, CA 7.5-minute quads APPENDIX D CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT MANAGEMENT SUMMARY A cultural resources investigation was conducted for the construction of the Emerald Necklace Trails Project, Los Angeles County. The Emerald Necklace Project, when completed, will be a 17-mile interconnected network of bikeways, multi-use trails, parks, and greenways along the Rio Hondo and the San Gabriel River in Los Angeles County. The investigation was completed to assess whether cultural resources would be impacted as a result of the Project. The assessment was based on a records search conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center, a study of historical maps, and the prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic context for the project area. The prehistoric and ethnographic context shows that in Late Prehistoric times, the Gabrielino occupied the area and lived in villages along the rivers and drainages. The site of the first San Gabriel Mission is located in the western part of the Whittier Narrows area. There were also late 19th-century settlements in this area. The results of the records search also indicate numerous previously recorded prehistoric and historic sites in the western part of the Whittier Narrows area.
    [Show full text]