DOCSLIB.ORG

J. Gresham Machen and the End of the Presbyterian Controversy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
J. Gresham Machen and the End of the Presbyterian Controversy J. GRESHAM MACHEN AND THE END OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CONTROVERSY by Samuel Jordan Kelley A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Boise State University December 2013 © 2013 Samuel Jordan Kelley ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COLLEGE DEFENSE COMMITTEE AND FINAL READING APPROVALS of the thesis submitted by Samuel Jordan Kelley Thesis Title: J. Gresham Machen and the End of the Presbyterian Controversy Date of Final Oral Examination: 14 November 2013 The following individuals read and discussed the thesis submitted by student Samuel Jordan Kelley, and they evaluated his presentation and response to questions during the final oral examination. They found that the student passed the final oral examination. Jill K. Gill, Ph.D. Chair, Supervisory Committee Barton H. Barbour, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee Shelton Woods, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee The final reading approval of the thesis was granted by Jill K. Gill, Ph.D., Chair of the Supervisory Committee. The thesis was approved for the Graduate College by John R. Pelton, Ph.D., Dean of the Graduate College. For Ben and Shannon—my only brother and my only niece iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Since I began at Boise State as a nineteen-year-old undergraduate, I have had a variety of wonderful relationships with faculty, especially in the departments of history and philosophy. As a graduate student, however, all my debts have been in the history department. Dr. Jill Gill was neither my committee chair nor my advisor when I began the Master’s program, but she took me under her wing early and helped me reorient my scholarly interests, and has worked tirelessly and patiently with me and directly on my behalf. Dr. Barton Barbour has been a perennial mentor. I have enjoyed all our conversations out in the hallway, especially as I wrote this thesis. I thank Dr. Lisa Brady for working with Dr. Gill to arrange for me to have a graduate assistantship for the 2012- 13 academic year. Finally, I am grateful to Dr. Lisa McClain, who has always graciously critiqued my work and offered invaluable advice. My brother, grandmother, aunt, friends, and coworkers have shown me much love in their forbearance. My father and mother, Thomas and Linda Sweet, have never ceased providing me with what I did not merit and what I could not obtain for myself. If there is any relationship where Christ’s love can appear as radiantly as in my relationship to my family, I have seen it in my engagement to Leslie Smith. I look forward to our future, whatever it brings. v I would be remiss not to thank publicly George Marsden and D.G. Hart, both of whom consented to phone interviews about topics closely related to this thesis. I admire their work greatly. Marsden’s influence in particular is obvious throughout. Thank you, Grace Mullen, for acclimating me to the Machen archives at Westminster. Finally, I thank Associate Dean Shelton Woods. For eight years I have talked more than listened to him and still somehow feel like I have received more wisdom from him than I will ever be able to pass on. I am confident that our friendship will last an eternity. vi ABSTRACT From 1922 to 1936, the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America suffered an extended period of conflict and finally schism. This Presbyterian controversy was part of the broader fundamentalist-modernist conflict seizing American evangelical Protestantism in this era. By the early 1930s, the fundamentalists, led by Westminster Theological Seminary’s New Testament professor J. Gresham Machen, began to adopt controversial methods for combating modernism. The most notable of these was the formation of an extra-ecclesiastical, conservative foreign missions board, the Independent Board for Presbyterian Foreign Missions (IBPFM). Refusing to cede his ground, Machen stood trial in the church’s court and was defrocked in 1936 when he refused to repent and be readmitted to the ministry. His actions alienated not only liberals, but even some fellow fundamentalists. Histories of the fundamentalist-modernist conflict and the Presbyterian controversy, and biographies of Machen generally take positions that echo the views of the opposing parties in the Presbyterian controversy. This thesis examines the controversy on a different level, employing historian George Marsden’s “insider- outsider” paradigm as a way to understand why the formation of the IBPFM and the Machen trial were such divisive events, even among conservatives. The argument is that Machen was not simply a cantankerous, fundamentalist but a Presbyterian who felt strongly committed to his denomination while also alienated from it because of its acceptance of modern trends. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................... v ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ vii CHAPTER ONE: THE END OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CONTROVERSY: INTRODUCTION AND HISTORIOGRAPHICAL BACKGROUND ................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Historiographical Background and Issues of Interpretation ....................................... 12 CHAPTER TWO: MODERNISM, FUNDAMENTALISM, AND THE AMERICAN EVANGELICAL HERITAGE ............................................................................................... 24 CHAPTER THREE: THE CHARACTER OF EARLY TWENTIETH-CENTURY AMERICAN PRESBYTERIANISM ..................................................................................... 50 CHAPTER FOUR: J. GRESHAM MACHEN: HALF-HEARTED FUNDAMENTALIST . 73 CHAPTER FIVE: THE FOREIGN MISSIONS CRISIS AND THE FORMATION OF THE INDEPENDENT BOARD FOR PRESBYTERIAN FOREIGN MISSIONS ............... 92 CHAPTER SIX: THE INDEPENDENT BOARD UNDER FIRE, MACHEN ON TRIAL, AND A PARADOX RESOLVED ........................................................................................ 113 CHAPTER SEVEN: CONCLUSION AND EPILOGUE: MACHEN’S LEGACY AND THE LEGACY OF THE GOSPEL....................................................................................... 139 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................... 147 viii 1 CHAPTER ONE: THE END OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CONTROVERSY: INTRODUCTION AND HISTORIOGRAPHICAL BACKGROUND Supporters of Machen tend to interpret him simply at the level of the doctrine for which he stood…The other common interpretation of Machen goes to the opposite extreme and is popular among his detractors. According to these interpreters, the “time of troubles” at Princeton Seminary and Machen’s later struggles against the Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A. can be explained largely in terms of Machen’s personality…So, I think each of these levels for understanding Machen has some merit and perhaps they can be balanced against each other in some way. However, I do not propose to explore them any further tonight. -George Marsden in “Understanding J. Gresham Machen” (1990) Introduction In late June 1936, John Gresham Machen, a theologian, ordained minister, and spokesman for conservative Presbyterianism, until recently of the Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A. (PCUSA), made a bold proclamation. “On Thursday, June 11, 1936,” he wrote, the hopes of many long years were realized. We became members, at last, of a true Presbyterian Church; we recovered, at last, the blessing of true Christian fellowship. What a joyous moment it was! How long the years of struggle seemed to sink into nothingness compared with the joy and peace that filled our hearts! 1 1 J. Gresham Machen, “The Church of God,” Presbyterian Guardian 2 (June 1936), 98, quoted in Dallas M. Roark, “J. Gresham Machen: The Doctrinally True Presbyterian Church,” Journal of Presbyterian History 43 (June 1965), 124. 2 Machen was celebrating a new church—what became the Orthodox Presbyterian Church (OPC)—that he and others had founded in response to the unrepentant apostasy they saw in the Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A. This triumphant comment of Machen’s might be growing somewhat trite among students of the Presbyterian controversy and Machen. For those who are sympathetic to Machen’s views today, it is a reminder of his sacrifices and the hardships he suffered for the sake of orthodoxy eighty years ago. For many mainline Protestants—Presbyterian and otherwise—it is the self-indulgent, self-affirming remark of someone who had never really intended to settle the dispute in the PCUSA unless it was achieved “one hundred percent” on his terms; in other words, in founding the OPC, Machen had accomplished the unremarkable feat of fulfilling a self-fulfilling prophecy. Regardless of perspective, 1936 marked the end of an era in the PCUSA; the period of intense controversies in that denomination was over when Machen and those who followed him were either defrocked as the result of church trials (like Machen’s) or left of their own accord. 2 What historians call the Presbyterian controversy spanned most of the interwar period, and this thesis examines its dénouement in the years 1933-36, when the immediate issues that caused the 1936 schism came to the fore and the last straw, so to speak, was placed on the camel’s back. The fundamentalist J. Gresham Machen played a major role in the early phase of the Presbyterian controversy, but his actions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volume 13 Number 13
    ~"h ~ JuI.!..~~~.ol,!: 31'. ~tt~bam '-atbtn ~bitot 193(;·1937 Z::I il1!d1tiff One Year-$2.00 Published Twenty.three Times a Year Ten Cents a Copy EDITORIAL COUNCIL 1505 Race Street John P. Clelland John Patton Galbraith Edwin H. Rian Thomas R. Birch Phllaclelphia 2, Pa.' Leslie W. Sloat Ned B. Stonehouse Managing Editor The Banner of Westminster Seminary In Substance the Text of an Address Delivered at the Alumni Banquet Held on the Occasion of Westminster's Fifteenth Annual Commencement By the, REV. JOHN MURRAY Professor of Systematic: Theoloc)Y In Westminster TheoloC)lc:al Seminary N THE cover of the official magazine of the cessity of belief in the virgin birth of our Lord, His O church in which I was reared in Scotland, there substitutionary atonement, His bodily resurrection and was always quoted the text from Psalm 60, "Thou hast the supernatural character of His miracles for the given a' banner to them that fear, thee, that it may be ordination and good standing of ministers in the Pres­ displayed because of the truth". byterian Church in the U.S.A. This fact, together with We are meeting tonight on the occasion of the'fif­ the fact that not one of these signers had ever been teenth annual ,commencement of Westminster Theo­ disciplined for such avowal, shows the lamentable de­ logicalSeminary. It may well be said in connection with cline from the true faith in the denomination con­ Westminster Seminary, "Thou hast given a banner to cerned. them that fear thee, that it may be displayed because It was not merely in the Presbyterian Church in the of the truth".
    [Show full text]
  • Orthodoxy in American Jewish Life1
    ORTHODOXY IN AMERICAN JEWISH LIFE1 by CHARLES S. LIEBMAN INTRODUCTION • DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ORTHODOXY • EARLY ORTHODOX COMMUNITY • UNCOMMITTED ORTHODOX • COM- MITTED ORTHODOX • MODERN ORTHODOX • SECTARIANS • LEAD- ERSHIP • DIRECTIONS AND TENDENCIES • APPENDLX: YESHIVOT PROVIDING INTENSIVE TALMUDIC STUDY A HIS ESSAY is an effort to describe the communal aspects and institutional forms of Orthodox Judaism in the United States. For the most part, it ignores the doctrines, faith, and practices of Orthodox Jews, and barely touches upon synagogue hie, which is the most meaningful expression of American Orthodoxy. It is hoped that the reader will find here some appreciation of the vitality of American Orthodoxy. Earlier predictions of the demise of 11 am indebted to many people who assisted me in making this essay possible. More than 40, active in a variety of Orthodox organizations, gave freely of their time for extended discussions and interviews and many lay leaders and rabbis throughout the United States responded to a mail questionnaire. A number of people read a draft of this paper. I would be remiss if I did not mention a few by name, at the same time exonerating them of any responsibility for errors of fact or for my own judgments and interpretations. The section on modern Orthodoxy was read by Rabbi Emanuel Rackman. The sections beginning with the sectarian Orthodox to the conclusion of the paper were read by Rabbi Nathan Bulman. Criticism and comments on the entire paper were forthcoming from Rabbi Aaron Lichtenstein, Dr. Marshall Ski are, and Victor Geller, without whose assistance the section on the number of Orthodox Jews could not have been written.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith and Life: Readings in Old Princeton Theology 05HT6160 RTS-Houston – Fall 2021 John R
    Faith and Life: Readings in Old Princeton Theology 05HT6160 RTS-Houston – Fall 2021 John R. Muether ([email protected]) Meeting Dates October 1-2 (Friday and Saturday) December 3-4 (Friday and Saturday) Course Description A survey of the “majestic testimony” of Princeton Theological Seminary from its founding in 1812 to its reorganization in 1929, with readings from major figures including Archibald Alexander, Charles Hodge, Benjamin Warfield, and others. Emphasis will fall on its defense of the Reformed faith against the challenges of its time, its influence on the establishment of American Presbyterian identity, and its role in shaping contemporary American evangelicalism. Course Outline (Subject to Change) 1. Introduction: What was Old Princeton? 2. Archibald Alexander 3. Charles Hodge 4. A. A. Hodge 5. B. B. Warfield 6. Other Voices 7. J. G. Machen 8. Conclusion: The Legacy of Old Princeton Assignments 1. Completion of 1000 pages of reading. (10%) 2. Class presentation on a representative of Old Princeton theology (20%) 3. Research Paper (50%) 4. Class attendance and participation (20%) Readings Students will compile a reading list of primary and secondary sources in consultation with the instructor. It should include 1. Selections from Calhoun and/or Moorhead 2. Readings from at least four members of the Old Princeton faculty 3. At least two selections from both The Way of Life by Charles Hodge and Faith and Life by B. B. Warfield. 4. Resources for their class presentation and research paper. Research Paper The research paper is a 3000-4000 word paper which will explore in depth a particular figure in the story of Old Princeton.
    [Show full text]
  • POSTMODERN OR PROPOSITIONAL? Robert L
    TMSJ 18/1 (Spring 2007) 3-21 THE NATURE OF TRUTH: POSTMODERN OR PROPOSITIONAL? Robert L. Thomas Professor of New Testament Ernest R. Sandeen laid a foundation for a contemporary concept of truth that was unique among evangelicals with a high view of Scripture. He proposed that the concept of inerrancy based on a literal method of interpretation was late in coming during the Christian era, having its beginning among the Princeton theologians of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. He ruled out their doctrines related to inspiration because they were based on rational thinking which he taught was absent from earlier Christian thought. Subsequent evaluations of Sandeen’s work have disproved his assumption that those doctrines were absent from Christianity prior to the Princeton era. Yet well-known Christian writers have since built on Sandeen’s foundation that excludes rationality and precision from an interpretation of Scripture. The Sandeenists criticize the Princetonians for overreacting in their response to modernism, for their use of literal principles of interpretation, for defining propositional truth derived from the Bible, and for excluding the Holy Spirit’s help in interpretation. All such criticisms have proven to be without foundation. The Princetonians were not without fault, but their utilization of common sense in biblical interpretation was their strong virtue. Unfortunately, even the Journal of the inerrantist Evangelical Theological Society has promoted some of the same errors as Sandeen. The divine element in inspiration is a guarantee of the rationality and precision of Scripture, because God, the ultimate author of Scripture, is quite rational and precise, as proven by Scripture itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization and Orthodox Christianity: a Glocal Perspective
    religions Article Globalization and Orthodox Christianity: A Glocal Perspective Marco Guglielmi Human Rights Centre, University of Padua, Via Martiri della Libertà, 2, 35137 Padova, Italy; [email protected] Received: 14 June 2018; Accepted: 10 July 2018; Published: 12 July 2018 Abstract: This article analyses the topic of Globalization and Orthodox Christianity. Starting with Victor Roudometof’s work (2014b) dedicated to this subject, the author’s views are compared with some of the main research of social scientists on the subject of sociological theory and Eastern Orthodoxy. The article essentially has a twofold aim. Our intention will be to explore this new area of research and to examine its value in the study of this religion and, secondly, to further investigate the theory of religious glocalization and to advocate the fertility of Roudometof’s model of four glocalizations in current social scientific debate on Orthodox Christianity. Keywords: Orthodox Christianity; Globalization; Glocal Religions; Eastern Orthodoxy and Modernity Starting in the second half of the nineteen-nineties, the principal social scientific studies that have investigated the relationship between Orthodox Christianity and democracy have adopted the well-known paradigm of the ‘clash of civilizations’ (Huntington 1996). Other sociological research projects concerning religion, on the other hand, have focused on changes occurring in this religious tradition in modernity, mainly adopting the paradigm of secularization (in this regard see Fokas 2012). Finally, another path of research, which has attempted to develop a non-Eurocentric vision, has used the paradigm of multiple modernities (Eisenstadt 2000). In his work Globalization and Orthodox Christianity (2014b), Victor Roudometof moves away from these perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 13 Number 14
    .~ ~ JU!!".~I.ol!44 1!~"~'it,lJt:~.....';a11 3f. 8rt;bam :Matbtn ~l:JitOt 1936~1937 l:t tift One Year-$2.00 Published Twenty-threeil1!t1iTimes a Year Ten Cents a Copy EDITORIAL COUNCIL 1505 Race Street John P. Clelland John Patton Galbraith Edwin H. Rlan Thomas R. Birch PhiladelphIa 2. Pa. Leslie W. Sloat Ned B. Stonehouse Managing Edl,for Discontent! By the REV. PAUL WOOLLEY Professor of Church History in Westminster Theological Seminary EIGHT years have passed-it seems longer-since The years that have followed since 1937 have seen a those glorious days in 1936 when The Orthodox slow and constant growth.of The Orthodox Presby­ Presbyterian Church was born. It is not difficult to terian Church. Its stability has been tested and proved. recapture in spirit the great enthusiasms of that June Its love of the Word has become manifest. Its steady day in Philadelphia when the church was first consti­ attention to the privilege of preaching the gospel and" tuted. The fervor was high and it rose ever higher be­ ministering to the saints has been demonstrated. cause the church was committing itself to an ideal that But there is, in this year 1944, discontent within the had been tested and proved through centuries-s-the church. Now discontent can be of two kinds-healthy' ideal of a Biblical church, its divinely ordained princi­ or malignant. This discontent is of the second kind .as ples drawn directly from the Bible and its modes of well as of the first. ' operation in' matters not Biblically prescribed based An American writer has recently pointed out that upon the experience of the Reformed churches through sooner or later any organization or entity in human so­ the ages.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Collective
    The magazine of Union Theological Seminary Spring 2019 UNION COLLECTIVE A More Plural Union At the Border Radical Legacy Black and Buddhist Union students and alums travel to Tijuana How James Cone’s work helped one Ga. Rima Vesely-Flad ’02, ’13 describes first-ever to protest U.S. abuse of migrants | p.2 town confront its racist past | p.4 gathering of Black Buddhist teachers | p.5 IN THIS ISSUE UNION COLLECTIVE Spring 2019 Published by Union Theological Seminary in the City of New York 3041 Broadway at 121st Street New York, NY 10027 TEL: 212-662-7100 WEB: utsnyc.edu Editor-in-Chief Emily Enders Odom ’90 Editorial Team Benjamin Perry ’15 Robin Reese Kate Sann EDS at union Writers 9 Emily Enders Odom ’90 Kelly Brown Douglas ’82, ’88 The Borders We Must Cross Simran Jeet Singh Dozens of Episcopal leaders visit the U.S. /Mexico border Serene Jones Pamela Ayo Yetunde Kenneth Claus ’70 Tom F. Driver ’53 articles Harmeet Kamboj ’20 Benjamin Perry ’15 LaGrange and the Lynching Tree 4 Lisa D. Rhodes Audrey Williamson Black and Buddhist 5 School of Sacred Music Alumni/ae Outliving Expectations 6 Copy Editor A More Plural Union 11 Eva Stimson Alumnae Receive Awards for Activism 20 Art Direction & Graphic Design Building a Legacy 25 Ron Hester Cover Photograph DEPARTMENTS Ron Hester 1 Letter from the President Back Cover Photographs 2 Union Making News Mohammad Mia ’21 9 Episcopal Divinity School at Union Highlights 15 Union Initiatives Stay Connected 18 Faculty News @unionseminary 21 Class Notes 23 In Memoriam 25 Giving Give to Union: utsnyc.edu/donate From the President Dear Friends, We are moving into a season of profound Union has long been a place that prepares change and spiritual renewal at Union people for ministry of all sorts, and while Theological Seminary.
    [Show full text]
  • Adorable Trinity” Paul Kjoss Helseth
    Charles Hodge on the Doctrine of the “Adorable Trinity” Paul Kjoss Helseth Paul Kjoss Helseth is Professor of Christian Thought at the University of Northwest- ern, St. Paul, Minnesota. He earned his PhD from Marquette University in Systematic Theology. Dr. Helseth is the author of“Right Reason” and the Princeton Mind: An Unorth- odox Proposal (P&R, 2010). He is also a contributor to Four Views on Divine Providence (Zondervan, 2011) and Reforming or Conforming?: Post-Conservative Evangelicals and the Emerging Church (Crossway, 2008). In addition, Dr. Helseth is co-editor of Reclaiming the Center: Confronting Evangelical Accommodation in Postmodern Times (Crossway, 2004) and Beyond the Bounds: Open Theism and the Undermining of Biblical Christianity (Crossway, 2003). Introduction Shortly after the untimely death of his brother’s son in December 1850, Charles Hodge wrote to his brother Hugh gently to remind him that the only way to cultivate the kind of sorrow that “is [in] every way healthful to the soul” is to mingle sorrow “with pious feeling, with resignation, confidence in God, [and] hope in his mercy and love.”1 “The great means of having our sorrow kept pure,” Hodge counseled, “is to keep near to God, to feel assured of his love, that he orders all things well, and will make even our afflictions work out for us a far more exceeding and an eternal weight of glory.”2 But precisely how did Hodge encourage his brother Hugh to “keep near to God,” and in so doing to cultivate the kind of sorrow that works life and not death, the kind of sorrow that is best described as “sorrow after a godly sort”?3 In short, Hodge encouraged his brother to cultivate godly and not “worldly”4 SBJT 21.2 (2017): 67-85 67 The Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 21.2 (2017) sorrow by remembering the doctrine of the Trinity.
    [Show full text]
  • The League of Evangelical Students HEADQUARTERS ·Whea Ton Illinois
    The League of Evangelical Students HEADQUARTERS ·Whea ton Illinois EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE President, CALVIN K. CUMMINGS, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Westminster Theological Seminary Vice-President, NICHOLAS J . BURGGRAAl~F, Holland, Michigan Western Theological Seminary Secretary, MISS MARJORIE W. ERDMAN, Jenkintown, Pennsylvania Bea ver College ISSAC M. BRUBACHER, Dallas, Texas Evangelical Theological College WILLIAM ONCKEN, Princeton, New Jersey Princeton University BOARD OF TRUSTEES R. B. KUIPER, M. A., B. D., President, LEANDER S. KEYSER, M. A., D. D., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Springfield, Ohio. LEWIS SPERRY CHAFER, D. D., Vice- J. GRESHAM MACHEN, D. D., Litt. D., President, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Dallas, Texas. HERBERT MACKENZIE, D.D. ALBERTUS PIETERS, D. D., Secreta1'y, Cleveland, Ohio. Holland, Michigan. WILLIAM CHILDS ROBINSON, M. A., Th. D. 1. H. LINTON, B. A., LL. B., Treasurer, Decatur, Georgia. Kellogg Building, Washington, D. C. ROBERT K. RUDOLPH, B. A., MRS. WILLIAM BORDEN (deceased), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. New York, New York. HAROLD PAUL SLOAN, D. D., CLARENCE Bou MA, Th. D., Haddonfield, New Jersey. Grand Rapids, Michigan. H. FRAMER SMITH, Ph. D., Th. D., MILO F. JAMISON, M. A., B. Th., Chicago, Illinois. Los Angeles, California. PAUL WOOLLEY, M. Th., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. ------ WILLIAM J. JONES, M. A., B. -Th., General Secretary, Columbia, South Carolina. Men's Colleges W. HARLLEE BORDEAUX, B. A., New England Regional Secretary, Old Greenwich, Connecticut. Women's Colleges MARGARET HUNT, B. A., Central Regional S ecretm'y, Chicago, Illinois. MARJORIE MYER, B. A., Southern Regional Secretary, Louisville, Kentucky. "By the word of truth, by the power of God."-II Corinthians 6 :7. The League of Evangelical Students is a continent-wide organization of students, tounded in 1925 by a student group.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith and Learning the Heritage of J
    REVIEW: Hoffecker’s Charles Hodge by Barry Waugh NewHorizons in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church OCT 2012 OCT Faith and LearninG The Heritage of J. Gresham Machen by Katherine VanDrunen ALSO: NEW BOOKS ON OLD PRINCETON by D. G. Hart and John R. Muether V o l u m e 3 3 , N u m b e r 9 NewHorizoNs iN tHe ortHodox PresbyteriaN CHurch Contents Editorial Board: The Committee on Christian Education’s Subcommittee on Serial Publications Editor: Danny E. Olinger FEATURES Managing Editor: James W. Scott Editorial Assistant: Patricia Clawson Cover Designer: Christopher Tobias 3 Faith and Learning: The Heritage of Proofreader: Sarah J. Pederson J. Gresham Machen © 2012 by The Committee on Christian Education of By Katherine VanDrunen The Orthodox Presbyterian Church. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all Scripture quotations are 6 The Personal Side of Charles Hodge from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version, copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publish- By Alan D. Strange ers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Articles previously published may be slightly edited. The Legacy of Geerhardus Vos 8 New Horizons (ISSN: 0199-3518) is published monthly By Danny E. Olinger except for a combined issue, usually August-Septem- ber, by the Committee on Christian Education of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church, 607 N. Easton Road, 19 Planning for a Minister’s Retirement Bldg. E, Willow Grove, PA 19090-2539; tel. 215/830- By Douglas L. Watson 0900; fax 215/830-0350. Letters to the editor are welcome. They should deal with an issue the magazine has recently addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Engagement Guidelines: Orthodox Christian Leaders
    Tip Sheets: Engaging Faith Communities V1.2 Engagement Guidelines: Orthodox Christian Leaders Religion Called: Orthodox Christianity Adherents Consider Themselves: Christian and are called Orthodox Christians House of Worship: Church or Cathedral First Point of Contact: Senior parish priest a.k.a. pastor Religious Leader: Priest or Deacon Spoken Direct Address: Use “Father” Physical Interaction: Handshake O.K. across sexes HOUSE OF WORSHIP Churches are local houses of worship. A parish refers to the congregation of a particular church. Parishes often have non-sacred spaces such as multipurpose rooms, schools, gyms, or offices. Cathedrals are large centers of worship for an entire regional area run by a Diocese or Archdiocese. Monasteries and convents house monks and nuns (respectively), and may include a chapel and areas for instruction/work. RELIGIOUS LEADERS Ordained/Commissioned/Licensed Leaders Orthodox Christian leadership is hierarchical with each national/ethnic branch having its own structure and leadership. Regional leadership generally falls to bishops (or archbishops, catholicos, or metropolitans). Priests and deacons provide sacramental and spiritual leadership; priests often are in charge of a local parish. Both priests and deacons are permitted to marry. Holy Orders and Lay Leaders Monks and nuns are non-ordained (lay) leaders (except for hiermonks who are ordained priests or deacons) who have usually taken a vow of poverty, celibacy, and obedience and often live an active vocation of both prayer and service. Many monks, nuns, and laypersons have important leadership positions —avoid assumptions based on title. Some U.S. parishes have lay administrators who take on many of the roles once the exclusive domain of clergy.
    [Show full text]
  • Theological Library Automation in 1995 196 Louis Charles Willard the Only Thing 217
    The American Theological Library Association Essays in Celebration of the First Fifty Years Edited by M. Patrick Graham Valerie R. Hotchkiss Kenneth E. Rowe The American Theological Library Association 1996 Copyright © 1996 By The American Theological Library Association All rights reserved Published in the United States by The American Theological Library Association, .820 Church Street, Suite 300, Evanston, Illinois 60201 Prepress production, including text and cover, by Albert E. Hurd. ISBN: 0-524-10300-3 ATLA Cataloging in publication: The American Theological Library Association : essays in celebration of the first fifty years / edited by M. Patrick Graham, Valerie R. Hotchkiss and Kenneth E. Rowe. — Evanston, 111. : American Theological Library Association, 1996. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references. Contents: ISBN 0-524-10300-3 1. American Theological Library Association. 2. Library science— Societies, etc. 3. Theological libraries. 4. Theology—Study and teaching. I. Graham, Matt Patrick. II. Hotchkiss, Valerie R., 1960- III. Theological Library Association׳ Rowe, Kenneth E. IV. American Z675.T4A62 1996 Printed on 50# Natural; an acid free paper by McNaughton & Gunn, Inc. Contents The Editors Acknowledgments v Albert E. Hurd Preface vil THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE AMERICAN THEOLOGICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION Elmer J. and Betty A. O'Brien From Volunteerism to Corporate Professionalism: A Historical Sketch of the American Theological Library Association 3 John A. Bottler The Internationalization of the American Theological Library Association 25 Alan D. Krieger From the Outside In: A History of Roman Catholic Participation in the ATLA 36 Cindy Derrenbacker A Brief Reflection on ATLA Membership 43 Myron B. Chace ATLA's Preservation Microfilming Program: Growing Out of Our Work 47 Paul F.
    [Show full text]