The Yellow Creek Alluvial Fan Dynamics and Impact to Tourism Infrastructure in the Fox Valley

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Yellow Creek Alluvial Fan Dynamics and Impact to Tourism Infrastructure in the Fox Valley The Yellow Creek Alluvial Fan Dynamics and Impact to Tourism Infrastructure in the Fox Valley A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science In Environmental Science by Stefanie L. Tibbotts University of Canterbury 2018 i Abstract Alluvial fans are dynamic depositional landforms that are susceptible to abrupt changes influenced by fluctuations in sediment supplies. In paraglacial environments alluvial fans display accelerated aggradation due to the extraordinary influxes of sediment into the system following glacier retreat. This thesis examines how a paraglacial alluvial fan in the Fox Valley has evolved over time, and assess the impact of fan dynamics on tourism infrastructure as well as probabilities of walking track closures. The study area is a significant tourism destination for the West Coast of New Zealand, with the Franz Josef and Fox Glaciers attracting 400,000 visitors to the area each year. Structure from motion (SfM), aerial imagery analysis, experimental physical modelling, binary regression statistics and chronological investigations using a Schmidt hammer, have all been incorporated into the methodology of this research. The findings of this research identified that between 2015-2017, there had been a mean elevation change of 1.94 m (+/- 30 cm) across Yellow fan, signifying a significant amount of aggradation that impacted the walking track locality. Noticeable changes on other fans within the valley displayed a similar aggrading trend, which has influenced the locality of the active Fox River channel, and has consequently increased the vulnerably of potential damage to infrastructure. The research also indicated that there is a 17.7% chance the glacier walking track could be closed on any given day linking track closure to rainfall events. Overall the significance of this research provides insight into the relationship between the dynamic paraglacial processes within the Fox Valley and impacts on tourism infrastructure. i Acknowledgments This thesis has been part of a long journey at the University of Canterbury and I would like to thank all the people that have helped me along the way. Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisory team, Dr Heather Purdie, Prof. Stefan Winkler and Dr Chris Gomez. Thank you for all the support, feedback and help you have provided along the way. Thank you to Heather and Chris for the multiple opportunities to travel to the West Coast, the support within the field and continuous encouragement along the way has always been valued. Thank you to the Brian Mason Scientific & Technical Trust for financial support covering field costs. A special thank you to Stefan for an excellent field trip on one of your visits to New Zealand, it was a great experience to complete some of my field work with you and gain knowledge from your glacial geomorphology expertise. A special extra thank you to Heather, you have been amazing! With all the issues that have arisen, your positive outlook and continued support has kept me inspired all the way to the end. Thank you to the wonderful technical team in the Geography Department, John Thyne, Justin Harrison, Nick Key and Paul Bealing. For always helping with equipment, software dilemmas and general enquires I always had. It was great to learn how to use the field equipment, which will only be beneficial for my future career. A big thank you to Dr Sam McColl from Massy University and the Department of Conservation, specifically Wayne and Owen for providing valuable data, enabling this research to be completed. To my wonderful friends and fellow geography postgrad students I have met along the way. It has been great to work with you all and get to know you. I have definitely made some lifelong friendships! Thanks for providing great banter and useful advice when needed. To my family, thank you for all your support while I have pursued my university studies over the years. You have always helped when needed and I would not be where I am today without you. Finally, you can be rest assured that I will be now finished with university and can get a job. Lastly, to Patrick, I cannot thank you enough for the amount of support you have provided me, couldn’t have done it without you. ii Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................. ii Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................. iii List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................ viii List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................. ix Terminology ............................................................................................................................................ x Chapter 1: Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Research Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 3 1.3. Thesis Structure ........................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2: Study Site .............................................................................................................................. 4 2.1. The Fox Valley .............................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Geology ......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Geomorphology ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.4. Glacial History .............................................................................................................................. 6 2.5 Weather and climate .................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 3: Background Information ...................................................................................................... 9 3.1. Paraglacial environments ........................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Alluvial Fan Characteristics ........................................................................................................ 11 3.2.1 Alluvial Fans ......................................................................................................................... 11 3.2.2 Fan dynamics........................................................................................................................ 12 3.2.3 Hydrology and Channel Dynamics ....................................................................................... 13 3.2.4 Alluvial Fan Environments .................................................................................................... 14 3.2.5 Influence on Evolution and Shape Variations ...................................................................... 14 3.2.6 Time scale............................................................................................................................. 15 3.3 Hazards ....................................................................................................................................... 15 3.3.1 Alluvial Fan Hazards ............................................................................................................. 15 3.3.2 Glacier Hazards .................................................................................................................... 16 3.3.3 Paraglacial Hazards .............................................................................................................. 16 iii 3.4 Anthropogenic Influences .......................................................................................................... 16 3.4.1 Urbanisation on Alluvial Fans ............................................................................................... 16 3.4.2 Typical mitigation structures ............................................................................................... 17 3.5 Tourism in the Fox Valley ........................................................................................................... 17 3.5.1 Tourism to the Area ............................................................................................................. 17 3.5.2 Current Management Plans ................................................................................................. 18 Chapter 4: Methodology Data Acquisition and Processing ...............................................................
Recommended publications
  • Scanned Using Fujitsu 6670 Scanner and Scandall Pro Ver
    794 1979/143 THE FRESHWATER FISHERIES REGULATIONS (WESTLAND) MODIFICATION NOTICE 1979 PURSUANT to section 83 (2) (d) of the Fisheries Act 1908, and to regulation 7 of the Freshwater Fisheries Regulations 1951, the Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries hereby gives the following notice. NOTICE l. Title-This notice may be cited as the Freshwater Fisheries Regulations (Westland) Modification Notice 1979. 2. Commencement-This notice shall come into force on the day after the date of its notification in the Gazette. 3. Application-This notice shall be in force only within the West­ land Acclimatisation District. 4. Modification of regulations-The Freshwater Fisheries Regulations 1951 * are hereby modified as follows: Limit Bag (a) No person shall on anyone day take or kill more than 14 acclimatised fish (being trout or salmon) of which no more than 4 may be salmon and no more than 10 may be trout: Size Limit (b) No person shall take or kill in any manner whatever or inten­ tionally have in his possession any trout or salmon that does not exceed- (i) In the case of any salmon, 30 cm in length: (ii) In the case of any trout, 22 cm in length: Open Season Exceptions (c) No person shall fish at any time for acclimatised fish in any stream flowing into Lake Wahapo or Lake Mapourika: Close Season Exception (d) There shall be no close season in Lake Mahinapua: *S.R. 1951/15 (Reprinted with Amendments Nos. 1 to 13: S.R. 1976/191) Amendment No. 14: (Revoked by S.R. 1976/268) Amendment No.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2019, Issue 4
    THE NEWS MAY 2019 S ISSUE 5 REDUCTION READINESS RESPONSE RECOVERY IN THIS ISSUE > Westland bears the brunt of heavy rainfall > AF8 Roadshow > Understanding the risk > New Zealand ShakeOut 2019 > Kid's time! Welcome to our Autumn newsletter! Looking after yourself and your family in an emergency | Readiness plans Many disasters will affect A household emergency plan will help you work out: essential services and possibly n What you will each do in the event n How and when to turn off the water, disrupt your ability to travel or of disasters such as an earthquake, electricity and gas at the main communicate with each other. tsunami, volcanic eruption, flood or switches in your home or business. storm. You may be confined to your home or Turn off gas only if you suspect a n How and where you will meet up during forced to evacuate your neighbourhood. leak, or if you are instructed to do so and after a disaster. In the immediate aftermath of a disaster, by authorities. If you turn the gas off emergency services may not be able to get n Where to store emergency survival you will need a professional to turn it help to everyone as quickly as needed. items and who will be responsible for back on and it may take them weeks to maintaining supplies. This is when you are likely to be most respond after an event. n vulnerable, so it is important to plan to What you will each need to have in your n What local radio stations to tune in to look after yourself and your loved ones getaway kits and where to keep them.
    [Show full text]
  • Waiho River Flooding Risk Assessment MCDEM 2002.Pdf
    Report 80295/2 Page i WAIHO RIVER FLOODING RISK ASSESSMENT For MINISTRY OF CIVIL DEFENCE & EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AUGUST 2002 Report 80295/2 Page ii PROJECT CONTROL Consultant Details Project Leader: Adam Milligan Phone: 04 471 2733 Project Team: Fax: 04 471 2734 Organisation: Optimx Limited Postal Address: P O Box 942, Wellington Peer Reviewer Details Reviewer: David Elms Phone: 03 364 2379 Position: Director Fax: 03 364 2758 Organisation: Optimx Limited Postal Address: Department of Civil Engineering University of Canterbury Private Bag 4800, Christchurch Client Details Client: Ministry of Civil Defence & Emergency Postal Address: PO Box 5010 Management Wellington Client contact: Richard O’Reilly Phone: 04 473 7363 Project Details Project: Waiho River Flooding Risk Assessment Project No.: 80295 Version Status File Date Approval signatory 1 Draft 80295 MCDEM Waiho River Risk Assessment Report - Aug 2002 David Elms Version 1.doc 2 Final Draft 80295 MCDEM Waiho River Risk Assessment Report - Aug 2002 David Elms Version 2.doc 3 Final 80295 MCDEM Waiho River Risk Assessment Report - Aug 2002 David Elms FINAL.doc This report has been prepared at the specific instructions of the Client. Only the Client is entitled to rely upon this report, and then only for the purpose stated. Optimx Limited accept no liability to anyone other than the Client in any way in relation to this report and the content of it and any direct or indirect effect this report my have. Optimx Limited does not contemplate anyone else relying on this report or that it will be used for any other purpose. Should anyone wish to discuss the content of this report with Optimx Limited, they are welcome to contact the project leader at the address stated above.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Lodge Route Guide
    Wilderness Lodge® Arthur’s Pass 16km East of Arthur’s Pass Village, Highway 73 [email protected] Wilderness Lodges +64 3318 9246 of New Zealand Wilderness Lodge® Lake Moeraki 90km South of Fox Glacier, Highway 6 wildernesslodge.co.nz [email protected] +64 3750 0881 Route Guide: Lake Moeraki to Arthur’s Pass This journey of 360km (about 200 miles) involves 5 to 6 hours of driving with great scenery and interesting stops along the way. We recom- mend that you allow as much time as possible. Key features include: beautiful rainforest; six large forested lakes; glistening snowy mountains and wild glacier rivers; the famous Fox and Franz Josef glaciers; the goldfields town of Hokitika; ascending Arthur’s Pass through the dramatic cleft of the Otira Gorge; and glorious alpine herbfields and shrublands at the summit. The times given below are driving times only. Enjoy Your Journey, Drive Safely & Remember to Keep Left Wilderness Lodge Lake Moeraki to Fox Glacier (92kms – 1¼ hrs) An easy drive through avenues of tall forest and lush farmland on mainly straight flat roads. Key features along this leg of the journey include Lake Paringa (20km), the Paringa River café and salmon farm (32km), a brief return to the coast at Bruce Bay (44km), and the crossing of three turbulent glacier rivers – the Karangarua (66km), Cook (86km) and Fox (90km) – at the point where they break free from the confines of their mountain valleys. In fair weather, striking views are available of the Sierra Range from the Karangarua River bridge (66km), Mt La Perouse (3079m) from the bridge across the Cook River (88km)and Mt Tasman (3498m) from the bridge over the Fox River (91km).The long summit ridge of Mt Cook (3754) is also briefly visible from just south of the Ohinetamatea River (15km north of the Karangarua River ) and again 4km further north on the approach to Bullock Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Using Fujitsu 6670 Scanner and Scandall Pro Ver 1.7 Software
    1617 1980/226 THE FRESHWATER FISHERIES REGULATIONS (WEST COAST AND WESTLAND) MODIFICATION NOTICE 1980 PURSUANT to section 83 (2) ( d) of the Fisheries Act 1908, and to regulation 7 of the Freshwater Fisheries Regulations 1951, the Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries hereby gives the following notice. NOTICE 1. Title-This notice may be cited as the Freshwater Fisheries Regulations (West Coast and Westland) Modification Notice 1980. 2. Commencement-This notice shall come into force on the 14th day after the date of its notification in the Gazette. 3. Application-This notice shall be in force only within the West Coast and Westland Acclimatisation Districts. 4. Modification of regulations-The Freshwater Fisheries Regulations 1951 * are hereby modified as follows: Limit Bag (a ) No person shall on anyone day take or kill more than 14 acclimatised fish (being trout or salmon) of which no more than 4 may be salmon and no more than 10 may be trout: Size Limit (b) No person shall take or kill in any manner whatever or inten­ tionally have in his possession any trout or salmon that does not exceed- (i) In the case of any salmon, 30 cm in length: (ii) In the case of any trout, 25 cm in length: Open Season Exceptions (c) No person shall fish at any time for acclimatised fish in any stream flowing into Lake Wahapo or Lake Mapourika: *S.R. 1951/15 (Reprinted with Amendments Nos. 1 to 13: S.R. 1976/191) Amendment No. 14: (Revoked by S.R. 19761268) Amendment No. 15: S.R. 19761268 Amendment No.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement 9: Regional Flood Control Assets
    West Coast Lifelines Vulnerability and Interdependency Assessment Supplement 9: Regional Flood Control Assets West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group August 2017 IMPORTANT NOTES Disclaimer The information collected and presented in this report and accompanying documents by the Consultants and supplied to West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group is accurate to the best of the knowledge and belief of the Consultants acting on behalf of West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group. While the Consultants have exercised all reasonable skill and care in the preparation of information in this report, neither the Consultants nor West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group accept any liability in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss, damage, injury or expense, whether direct, indirect or consequential, arising out of the provision of information in this report. This report has been prepared on behalf of West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group by: Ian McCahon BE (Civil), David Elms BA, MSE, PhD Rob Dewhirst BE, ME (Civil) Geotech Consulting Ltd 21 Victoria Park Road Rob Dewhirst Consulting Ltd 29 Norwood Street Christchurch 38A Penruddock Rise Christchurch Westmorland Christchurch Hazard Maps The hazard maps contained in this report are regional in scope and detail, and should not be considered as a substitute for site-specific investigations and/or geotechnical engineering assessments for any project. Qualified and experienced practitioners should assess the site-specific hazard potential, including the potential for damage, at a more detailed scale. Cover Photo: Greymouth Floodwall, Grey River, Greymouth West Coast Lifelines Vulnerability and Interdependency Assessment Supplement 9: Regional Flood Control Assets Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Franz Josef Welcome Aboard ENGLISH Copy
    1 Waiho River 11 Tasman Glacier Lake This incredibly active silt-laden river drains the melting ice from the Franz Josef Glacier and runoff This lake formed in 1991 and has been growing ever since. The icebergs, which are clearly visible from the Callery Valley. The Waiho River has been aggrading at 300 mm/yr in recent times and is at from the air, have taken about 500 years to travel from the neve at the top of the Tasman Glacier present some 2 metres above the surrounding land. to where they appear today. Underneath this lake the ice is still over 200 metres thick. AIR SAFARIS LAKE Okarito Forest & Lagoon LAKE TEKAPO TEKAPO AIRPORT The ancient dense Okarito rainforest is home to a small population of the rare Rowi (Okarito brown LAKE 2 Kiwi). The population is under considerable threat from introduced animals such as rats and stoats that 12 PUKAKI 12 Mackenzie Basin prey on the kiwi. To the North you can see the Okarito Lagoon, famous as a bird watchers’ paradise. Approximately 14,000 years ago the ice that covered this area from the last Ice Age began its Thousands of native birds, including nearly every mainland species in New Zealand, visit or make their retreat – today golden tussock and grasslands cover the glacial deposits that remain clearly visible home on this lagoon. It is perhaps best known for the kotuku (white heron) which breed here. These from the air. Dramatic ice-carved landscape, subtle ever-changing hues, and air of exceptional purity are a sacred bird to the Maori people.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Weathering in Highsedimentyielding Watersheds
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 110, F01008, doi:10.1029/2003JF000088, 2005 Chemical weathering in high-sediment-yielding watersheds, New Zealand W. Berry Lyons and Anne E. Carey Department of Geological Sciences and Byrd Polar Research Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA D. Murray Hicks NIWA Research, Christchurch, New Zealand Carmen A. Nezat1 Byrd Polar Research Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA Received 3 September 2003; revised 14 September 2004; accepted 30 November 2004; published 15 February 2005. [1] We have determined the chemical erosion yields for fifteen watersheds in New Zealand, ranging in size from 12.2 to 2928 km2. These rates, coupled with previously measured physical erosion yields, allow us to compare these two modes of landscape denudation. The physical erosion yields are some of the highest measured in the world. Although in most instances the chemical erosion yields are only a small fraction of the total erosion yields, the absolute values are very high. Our data strongly support the notion that chemical erosion rates are greatly influenced by the yield of physical erosion and that the rapid production of fresh surfaces as a result of high physical erosion rates and subsequent denudation is critical to the high chemical erosion yields observed. Citation: Lyons, W. B., A. E. Carey, D. M. Hicks, and C. A. Nezat (2005), Chemical weathering in high-sediment-yielding watersheds, New Zealand, J. Geophys. Res., 110, F01008, doi:10.1029/2003JF000088. 1. Introduction Vance et al., 2003]. In general, the net, large-scale erosional potential of a landscape is thought to increase with precip- [2] Over the past decade, a debate has occurred regard- itation, drainage area and slope [Montgomery et al., 2001].
    [Show full text]
  • Central Government Co-Investment in River Management for Flood Protection Critical Adaptation to Climate Change for a More Resilient New Zealand
    Central Government Co-investment in River Management for Flood Protection Critical Adaptation to Climate Change for a More Resilient New Zealand August 2019 CENTRAL GOVERNMENT CO-INVESTMENT IN RIVER MANAGEMENT FOR FLOOD PROTECTION Author(s): John Hutchings (HenleyHutchings), Julian Williams (BERL), Laws Lawson (Lawz Consulting) in association with regional authority river managers and Taranaki Regional Council CEO Basil Chamberlain. Front cover photo: Anzac Parade, Whanganui, Whanganui River in flood, 2015 PAGE I 2 AUGUST 2019 Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................................... 6 The challenge shared by regional authorities and central government ........................................................ 7 A brief history of river management for flood protection ............................................................................ 10 Current central government role ..................................................................................................................... 11 Assets protected ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Westland District Council Lifelines Assets
    West Coast Lifelines Vulnerability and Interdependency Assessment Supplement 12: Westland District Council Lifelines Assets West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group August 2017 IMPORTANT NOTES Disclaimer The information collected and presented in this report and accompanying documents by the Consultants and supplied to West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group is accurate to the best of the knowledge and belief of the Consultants acting on behalf of West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group. While the Consultants have exercised all reasonable skill and care in the preparation of information in this report, neither the Consultants nor West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group accept any liability in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss, damage, injury or expense, whether direct, indirect or consequential, arising out of the provision of information in this report. This report has been prepared on behalf of West Coast Civil Defence Emergency Management Group by: Ian McCahon BE (Civil), David Elms BA, MSE, PhD Rob Dewhirst BE, ME (Civil) Geotech Consulting Ltd 21 Victoria Park Road Rob Dewhirst Consulting Ltd 29 Norwood Street Christchurch 38A Penruddock Rise Christchurch Westmorland Christchurch Hazard Maps The hazard maps contained in this report are regional in scope and detail, and should not be considered as a substitute for site-specific investigations and/or geotechnical engineering assessments for any project. Qualified and experienced practitioners should assess the site-specific hazard potential, including the potential for damage, at a more detailed scale. Cover Photo: Franz Josef Oxidation Ponds, March 2016. Photo from West Coast Regional Council West Coast Lifelines Vulnerability and Interdependency Assessment Supplement 12: Westland District Council Lifeline Assets .
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Insects Recorded from Westland National Park
    ISSN 1171-9834 ® 1994 Department of Conservation Reference to material in this report should be cited thus: Eward, D., Putz R. & McLellan, I.D., 1994. Aquatic insects recorded from Westland National Park. Conservation Advisory Science Notes No. 78, Department of Conservation, Wellington. 18p. Commissioned by: West Coast Conservancy Location: NZMS Aquatic insects recorded from Westland National Park D. Eward R. Putz & I. D. McLellan Institute fur Zoologie, Freiburg University, Albertstrasse 21a, 7800 Freiburg, Germany. Research Associate, Landcare Research Institute, Private Box 95, Westport. ABSTRACT This report provides a list of aquatic insects found in Westland National Park, with a brief comment on their ecology. The list was compiled from the authors' collections, the literature and communications with other workers, in order to fill in gaps in the knowledge of aquatic insects in Westland National Park. It is also a plea for more taxonomic work to be carried out on New Zealand's invertebrate fauna. 1. INTRODUCTION This list arose out of frustration experienced by I.D. McLellan, when discussions about management plans and additions to Westland National Park revealed that although the botanical resources (through the dedicated work of Peter Wardle) and introduced mammal and bird fauna were well known, the invertebrate fauna had been ignored. The opportunity to remedy this occurred when D. Eward and R. Putz were referred to I. D. McLellan in order to complete a University semester of practical work in New Zealand. Part of the semester was spent collecting aquatic insects in the park, determining the material and compiling a preliminary list of aquatic insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining Significance Report
    Significance Assessment Report for Public Notification under 61c(2) of the CMA 1991 Applicant/Permit Holder: Kokiri Lime Company Limited Minerals Permit Number: Pending MP 60543 Permissions Record Number: 87595-AA To: Judi Brennan, Permissions Manager From: Lucy Croft, Permissions Advisor CONTENTS 1.0 Purpose and relevant considerations............................................................3 2.0 Context and background of the Access Arrangement .................................4 3.0 Location and land status...............................................................................5 4.0 Conservation values of the Access Arrangement area .................................7 5.0 Proposed activities and mining operations..................................................11 6.0 Potential effects and mitigation measures…….............................................13 7.0 Treaty of Waitangi considerations ...............................................................16 8.0 Relevant matters under section 61C(2)........................................................16 9.0 Summary and Conclusions...........................................................................19 10.0 Decision………………………………………………………………………………………….20 1.0 Purpose and Relevant Considerations Kokiri Lime Company Limited (the applicant), has applied to access 15 hectares (ha) of public conservation land (PCL) within Fox River to Haast - Conservation Area at Karangarua in the South Westland District, in order to undertake quarrying of rock. The purpose of this report is
    [Show full text]