Classification of New Zealand's Coastal Hydrosystems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Classification of New Zealand's Coastal Hydrosystems A classification of New Zealand's coastal hydrosystems Prepared for Ministry of the Environment October 2016 Prepared by: T. Hume (Hume Consulting Ltd) P. Gerbeaux (Department of Conservation) D. Hart (University of Canterbury) H. Kettles (Department of Conservation) D. Neale (Department of Conservation) For any information regarding this report please contact: Iain MacDonald Scientist Coastal and Estuarine Processes +64-7-859 1818 [email protected] National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd PO Box 11115 Hamilton 3251 Phone +64 7 856 7026 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: HAM2016-062 Report date: October 2016 NIWA Project: MFE15204 Quality Assurance Statement Reviewed by: Dr Murray Hicks Formatting checked by: Alison Bartley Approved for release by: Dr David Roper © All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the copyright owner(s). Such permission is only to be given in accordance with the terms of the client’s contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Whilst NIWA has used all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, NIWA does not give any express or implied warranty as to the completeness of the information contained herein, or that it will be suitable for any purpose(s) other than those specifically contemplated during the Project or agreed by NIWA and the Client. Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................5 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................7 2 The classification .................................................................................................................9 3 Geomorphic class ............................................................................................................... 12 3.1 Characteristics of geomorphic classes ...............................................................................12 3.2 Composite systems ............................................................................................................24 3.3 Stability of geomorphic classes ..........................................................................................24 4 Inventory of environmental variables ................................................................................. 28 4.1 The database ......................................................................................................................28 4.2 Distribution of coastal hydrosystems in New Zealand ......................................................28 5 Applications to management ............................................................................................. 33 5.1 Mapping systems and conservation and restoration planning .........................................33 5.2 Catchment land and water use planning and consenting .................................................34 5.3 Recognising values, threats and effects to coastal hydrosystems ....................................35 6 References ......................................................................................................................... 41 7 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... 48 8 Glossary ............................................................................................................................ 49 Appendix A Review of terminology associated with coastal hydrosystems ..................... 66 Appendix B Determination and naming of the geomorphic classes ................................ 72 Appendix C Identification key ....................................................................................... 75 Appendix D Google Earth images and schematics of geomorphic classes ........................ 80 Appendix E Inventory of environmental variables ......................................................... 92 Tables Table 2-1: How the hydrosystem and geomorphic class levels nest within a wider hierarchical classification. 9 Table 3-1: Geomorphic classes and 21 subclasses in the classification. 12 Table 3-2: Distinguishing characteristics of the geomorphic classes and subclasses. 13 Table 3-3: Summary of the temporal and spatial dynamics of geomorphic classes and subclasses. 25 Table 4-1: Distribution of coastal hydrosystems geomorphic classes by council region in New Zealand. 30 A classification of New Zealand's coastal hydrosystems 3 Table 4-2: Some key distinguishing characteristics of coastal hydrosystems in New Zealand. 32 Table 5-1: Services, values and uses for coastal hydrosystems. 38 Table 5-2: Threats to coastal hydrosystems. 39 Table 5-3: Effects of stressors on coastal hydrosystems. 40 Figures Figure 3-1: Clutha River, Otago. 27 Figure 3-2: Waimakariri River, Canterbury. 27 Figure 3-3: Lake Grassmere, Marlborough. 27 Figure 3-4: Orakei Basin, Auckland. 27 Figure 4-1: Distribution of the various geomorphic classes of coastal hydrosystem throughout New Zealand. 31 Figure 5-1: This example adapted from Hume et al. (2007) shows mapping of unmodified (green) and highly modified (red) estuaries. 34 4 A classification of New Zealand's coastal hydrosystems Executive Summary New Zealand has a long (18,000 km including estuarine shores) and highly varied coastline. New Zealand’s coastal water bodies, flowing and still, fresh to saline, span a wide range of environments; coastal wetlands; systems fed by small streams to large braided rivers; systems located at the interface of low to high-energy ocean settings; systems on muddy through sandy to gravelly coasts; and also large complex systems that are made up of several types or classes. The coastal hydrosystems classification described herein aims to reconcile and clarify coastal hydrosystem terminology and produce a hierarchy and classification of coastal wetland, riverine, estuarine and marine types. This report also provides some environmental parameters for the systems and gives examples of how the classification can be used to manage these systems and their catchments. The work began in June 2013 with workshops in June 2013 and January 2014 to explore ideas and the co-authors presenting ideas at conferences. In October 2015 MFE provided funding for NIWA, Hume Consulting Ltd and the University of Canterbury to work with the Department of Conservation to develop the classification further. Input from practitioners at a two-day stakeholders’ workshop in February 2016 contributed to the development of the classification and ensured its alignment with management applications. Many different terms are employed to describe these coastal hydrosystems, often in conflicting or confusing ways, in common language, scientific literature, legislative and planning documents. We have adopted the term “coastal hydrosystem” to describe coastal features that span a gradient from near coast freshwater lakes/wetlands (lacustrine/palustrine environments) to marine. This label avoids many pitfalls: it avoids mistakenly labelling all systems estuaries; it encompasses hydrosystems that are not end-of-river environments as well as large systems with multiple freshwater features; and unlike “waterbody”, it incorporates geomorphic, ecological and hydrological aspects of each system. In this report we provide a review (along with a glossary) of terms used to describe different kinds of coastal hydrosystems in use in common, statutory and scientific language and explain why precise definitions are important for coastal management. The coastal hydrosystems classification is based on a hierarchical view of the abiotic components that comprise the environments of coastal hydrosystems. Our classification presents detail at the geomorphic class level (III) of the hierarchy because this level is particularly important for coastal management and conservation needs at national and regional scales. However, to provide the wider context, we show how this can nest within a wider six-level hierarchy. Detail at levels IV to VI is best developed for specific management needs at the local scale using the description of structural and compositional habitat features. Geomorphic class, Level III of the hierarchy, sees hydrosystems defined as single type units/systems (or classes), each with associated characteristics. The classification recognises 11 geomorphic classes that are different enough from each other in their properties and the way they respond to natural and anthropogenic forcings that they need to be considered separately for management purposes. To keep the total number of classes small but at the same time recognise that some have a wide variety of characteristics that have different management implications, some classes have subclasses. Composite systems occur where a system contains subsystems representing different geomorphic classes. Whether a composite system is classified as a single class or a collection of several classes depends on the management question. The geomorphic classes are representative of types of systems that have been largely unmodified by anthropogenic activities such as reclamation, dredging, road/rail causeways and river-channel diversions. They exclude systems that have been totally created by humans such as small coastal lakes and flooded pits created by
Recommended publications
  • Fluctuation in Opossum Populations Along the North Bank of the Taramakau Catchment and Its Effect on the Forest Canopy C
    212 Vol. 9 FLUCTUATION IN OPOSSUM POPULATIONS ALONG THE NORTH BANK OF THE TARAMAKAU CATCHMENT AND ITS EFFECT ON THE FOREST CANOPY C. J. PEKELHARING Forest Research Institute, New Zealand Forest Service. Christchurch (Received for publication 10 August 1979) ABSTRACT Fluctuations in density patterns of opossum populations were studied by faecal pellet counts, along the North Bank of the Taramakau catchment from 1970 to 1977. The study area contained two major vegetation associations, rata/kamahi forest and red beech forest. Variations in density patterns over the years indicated that peak population numbers in the beech forests were approxi­ mately half those in the rata/kamahi forests. The upper transitional forests above both major forest types, however, reached similar peak densities. Canopy defoliation was studied by aerial photography in 1980 and in 1973. Within 13 years over 40% of the canopy in these protection forests was defoliated. This large-scale defoliation coincided with a build-up and peaking of the opossum population. In the winter of 1974 the whole area was poisoned by air with 1080 (sodium monofluoroacetate) impregnated carrot. Approximately 85% of the opossum population was removed by this operation. The greatest decline in pellet densities was recorded in the lower and mid-forest strata. INTRODUCTION A study on the dynamics of opossum populations was initiated by Bamford in 1970 along the north bank of the Taramakau River, Westland (Bamford, 1972). Faecal pellet lines established by Forest Research Institute staff in April 1970 were remeasured in April 1974, 1975 and 1977. The area was aerially poisoned by the Forest Service in June 1974.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of the Cape Farewell Upwelling Plume, New Zealand
    New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research ISSN: 0028-8330 (Print) 1175-8805 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnzm20 Dynamics of the Cape Farewell upwelling plume, New Zealand T. G. L. Shlrtcliffe , M. I. Moore , A. G. Cole , A. B. Viner , R. Baldwin & B. Chapman To cite this article: T. G. L. Shlrtcliffe , M. I. Moore , A. G. Cole , A. B. Viner , R. Baldwin & B. Chapman (1990) Dynamics of the Cape Farewell upwelling plume, New Zealand, New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 24:4, 555-568, DOI: 10.1080/00288330.1990.9516446 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00288330.1990.9516446 Published online: 30 Mar 2010. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 108 View related articles Citing articles: 15 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tnzm20 Download by: [203.118.161.175] Date: 14 February 2017, At: 22:09 New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 1990, Vol. 24: 555-568 555 0028-8330/2404-0555 $2.50/0 © Crown copyright 1990 Dynamics of the Cape Farewell upwelling plume, New Zealand T. G. L. SfflRTCLIFFE Keywords Cape Farewell; Farewell Spit; M. I. MOORE* Kahurangi; upwelling; Research School of Earth Sciences Victoria University of Wellington INTRODUCTION P.O. Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand Cape Farewell forms the north-west comer of the *Present address: New Zealand Occanographic South Island of New Zealand (Fig. 1). To the north Institute, DSIR Marine and Freshwater, Department lies a large bay which extends c.
    [Show full text]
  • Motupipi-Takaka Terraces and Plains Ecosystem Plant Lists
    MOTUPIPI – TAKAKA TERRACES & PLAINS ECOSYSTEM NATIVE PLANT RESTORATION LIST Flats east of the Takaka and Motupipi River floodplains, extending from Pohara inland up the Takaka valley to Uruwhenua and backed in the east by limestone and marble Locality: hill country. Outliers west of Takaka River include terraces of Go-Ahead Creek and those north of One-Spec Creek. Plains and terraces, in the north reaching 40m above sea level and gently dipping to Topography: the north-west, and inland rising up to 80m above sea level. Low-lying towards Motupipi Inlet and coast. Alluvial, sandy and silty loams of moderate fertility derived from a range of sedimentary rocks, marble, granites and schist. Overlying unweathered glacial outwash gravels. Soils and Geology: Mostly well-drained except along low-gradient, meandering water courses and behind strip of sandy coast at Motupipi-Clifton where there are swamp deposits. Not drought- prone. High sunshine hours; frosts mild to moderate; mild annual temperatures. Climate: Rainfall 1600mm on the coast to 2600mm inland. Coastal Influence: Between Motupipi Estuary and Pohara up to ½ km inland. Mixed podocarp-broadleaf forest, especially tōtara, mataī, tītoki and northern rātā on Original Vegetation: the drier sites and kāhikatea and pukatea on the less well-drained sites. Wetlands in low-lying areas. No original vegetation remaining. A few small and isolated secondary forest and Human Modification: treeland remnants persist as well as numerous scattered individual trees, particularly tōtara. [Refer to the Ecosystem Restoration map showing the colour-coded area covered by this list.] KEY TYPE OF FOOD PROVIDED FOR PLANTING RATIO PLANT PREFERENCES BIRDS AND LIZARDS Early Stage plants are able to Wet, Moist, Dry, Sun, Shade, Frost, Saline establish in open sites and can act as F = Fruit/seeds a nursery for later stage plants by 1 = prefers or tolerates providing initial cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Take a Look Inside
    CONTENTS Acknowledgements 7 Chapter 1 Anaweka Waka 11 Chapter 2 Hopelessly Lost 36 Chapter 3 Taplin’s Hut 55 Chapter 4 Little Biddy’s Story 66 Chapter 5 The Storekeeper’s Lament 80 Chapter 6 The Flying Cray Fishers 97 Chapter 7 River Ports 110 Chapter 8 Mining Magnesite 135 Chapter 9 Ranger’s Diary 154 Chapter 10 Heritage Huts 170 Chapter 11 Tracts of Iron 186 Chapter 12 Carbon Footprints 202 Chapter 13 Chasing the Kākahi 220 Chapter 14 Roaring Lion Gold 227 Chapter 15 Modern Controversy 236 Bibliography 250 CHAPTER 1 ANAWEKA WAKA THE DISCOVERY IN EARLY JANUARY 2012 of a 6.08-metre-long adzed- timber hull section from an obviously ancient and complex composite waka (canoe) on the Kahurangi coast was a significant find that was reported nationally. Eventually, news of the discovery spread globally, such were the age and unique features of the piece. It was identified as being no less than part of one of only two known voyaging canoes in existence, dating back to the early occupation of Polynesia, a time when ongoing maritime exploration and inter-island travel were the norm. In comparison, European mariners at that time were still only guessing when it came to navigating the open ocean. Partially exposed after a major storm event, the complete hull section was dug out of an eroded sand dune behind a natural log jam of driftwood at the mouth of a small freshwater seep some 200 metres north of the Anaweka Estuary. The story of the discovery of the Anaweka waka by a naturally curious boy should not be forgotten.
    [Show full text]
  • Aoraki Mount Cook
    Aoraki Mount Cook: Environmental Change on an Iconic Mountaineering Route Authors: Heather Purdie, and Tim Kerr Source: Mountain Research and Development, 38(4) : 364-379 Published By: International Mountain Society URL: https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-18-00042.1 BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use. Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/Mountain-Research-and-Development on 1/23/2019 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Mountain Research and Development (MRD) MountainResearch An international, peer-reviewed open access journal Systems knowledge published by the International Mountain Society (IMS) www.mrd-journal.org Aoraki Mount Cook: Environmental Change on an Iconic Mountaineering Route Heather Purdie1* and Tim Kerr2 * Corresponding author: [email protected] 1 University of Canterbury, Department of Geography, Arts Road, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand 2 Aqualinc Research Ltd, Aviation House, Unit 3, 12 Orchard Road, Burnside, Christchurch 8053, New Zealand Ó 2018 Purdie and Kerr.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Using Fujitsu 6670 Scanner and Scandall Pro Ver
    794 1979/143 THE FRESHWATER FISHERIES REGULATIONS (WESTLAND) MODIFICATION NOTICE 1979 PURSUANT to section 83 (2) (d) of the Fisheries Act 1908, and to regulation 7 of the Freshwater Fisheries Regulations 1951, the Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries hereby gives the following notice. NOTICE l. Title-This notice may be cited as the Freshwater Fisheries Regulations (Westland) Modification Notice 1979. 2. Commencement-This notice shall come into force on the day after the date of its notification in the Gazette. 3. Application-This notice shall be in force only within the West­ land Acclimatisation District. 4. Modification of regulations-The Freshwater Fisheries Regulations 1951 * are hereby modified as follows: Limit Bag (a) No person shall on anyone day take or kill more than 14 acclimatised fish (being trout or salmon) of which no more than 4 may be salmon and no more than 10 may be trout: Size Limit (b) No person shall take or kill in any manner whatever or inten­ tionally have in his possession any trout or salmon that does not exceed- (i) In the case of any salmon, 30 cm in length: (ii) In the case of any trout, 22 cm in length: Open Season Exceptions (c) No person shall fish at any time for acclimatised fish in any stream flowing into Lake Wahapo or Lake Mapourika: Close Season Exception (d) There shall be no close season in Lake Mahinapua: *S.R. 1951/15 (Reprinted with Amendments Nos. 1 to 13: S.R. 1976/191) Amendment No. 14: (Revoked by S.R. 1976/268) Amendment No.
    [Show full text]
  • Ïg8g - 1Gg0 ISSN 0113-2S04
    MAF $outtr lsland *nanga spawning sur\feys, ïg8g - 1gg0 ISSN 0113-2s04 New Zealand tr'reshwater Fisheries Report No. 133 South Island inanga spawning surv€ys, 1988 - 1990 by M.J. Taylor A.R. Buckland* G.R. Kelly * Department of Conservation hivate Bag Hokitika Report to: Department of Conservation Freshwater Fisheries Centre MAF Fisheries Christchurch Servicing freshwater fisheries and aquaculture March L992 NEW ZEALAND F'RESTTWATER F'ISHERIES RBPORTS This report is one of a series issued by the Freshwater Fisheries Centre, MAF Fisheries. The series is issued under the following criteria: (1) Copies are issued free only to organisations which have commissioned the investigation reported on. They will be issued to other organisations on request. A schedule of reports and their costs is available from the librarian. (2) Organisations may apply to the librarian to be put on the mailing list to receive all reports as they are published. An invoice will be sent for each new publication. ., rsBN o-417-O8ffi4-7 Edited by: S.F. Davis The studies documented in this report have been funded by the Department of Conservation. MINISTBY OF AGRICULTUBE AND FISHERIES TE MANAlU AHUWHENUA AHUMOANA MAF Fisheries is the fisheries business group of the New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. The name MAF Fisheries was formalised on I November 1989 and replaces MAFFish, which was established on 1 April 1987. It combines the functions of the t-ormer Fisheries Research and Fisheries Management Divisions, and the fisheries functions of the former Economics Division. T\e New Zealand Freshwater Fisheries Report series continues the New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Fisheries Environmental Report series.
    [Show full text]
  • Before a Special Tribunal Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In
    Before a Special Tribunal Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of an application for a Water Conservation Order for the Ngaruroro River and Clive River Statement of Evidence of Dr Douglas Alexander Rankin on behalf of New Zealand Fish and Game Council, Hawke's Bay Fish and Game Council, Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand, Jet Boating New Zealand, Whitewater NZ Incorporated and Ngāti Hori ki Kohupatiki 17 October 2017 Introduction 1 My name is Douglas Alexander Rankin. 2 I have been engaged by Whitewater NZ to assist with their application for a WCO on the Ngaruroro River by characterising the kayaking/rafting values of the Ngaruroro River in a regional and national context. Qualifications and experience 3 I am 64 years old and reside in Christchurch. I hold BSc (Hons) and PhD degrees in Chemistry from the University of Canterbury and have worked all my professional life until 2010 as a research chemist and scientist in wool science1 at the Wool Research Organisation of New Zealand (Inc) and its successors. 4 In the last five years I have been working virtually full time in a voluntary capacity as Conservation Officer for Whitewater NZ, on various issues concerning river and water conservation in New Zealand. 5 Since being introduced to sailing boats as a youngster, and then joining the University of Canterbury Canoe Club (UCCC) in 1971, and building my first canvas white water kayak, I have developed a life-long interest in white water paddling. This has involved me making journeys over the last forty six years to various well-known white water rivers throughout New Zealand and also in the United Kingdom, France, Austria, Germany, Switzerland, Australia and the USA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nelson-Marlborough Region
    SCIENCE & RESEARCH SERIES NO.43 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT STRATEGY: THE NELSON-MARLBOROUGH REGION by Aidan J. Challis Published by Head Office, Department of Conservation, P O Box 10-420, Wellington, New Zealand ISSN 0113-3713 ISBN 0-478-01334-5 © 1991, Department of Conservation National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-Publication data Challis, Aidan J. (Aidan John), 1948- Archaeological research and management strategy : the Nelson-Marlborough Region / by Aidan J. Challis. Wellington, N.Z. : Head Office, Dept. of Conservation, c1991. 1 v. (Science & research series, 0113-3713 ; no. 43) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-478-01334-5 1. Historic sites--New Zealand--Nelson-Marlborough Region— Conservation and restoration. 2. Excavations (Archaeology)— New Zealand--Nelson-Marlborough Region. 3. Maori (New Zealand people)--New Zealand--Nelson-Marlborough Region--Antiquities. 4. Nelson-Marlborough Region (N.Z.)--Antiquities. I. New Zealand.Dept. of Conservation. II. Title. III. Series: Science & research series ; no. 43. 363.6909935 Keywords: archaeological zones, Golden Bay, Granite Coast, Mineral Belt, Motueka River, Moutere Hills, site management, site protection, site significance, Clarence, D'Urville, Hundalee, Inland Marlborough, Kaikoura, Nelson, North-West Nelson, Richmond, Sounds, Wairau, NZMS260/P25, NZMS260/P26, NZMS260/N27, NZMS260/N25, NZMS260/M25, NZMS260/N26, NZMS262/9, NZMS260/O28 CONTENTS ABSTRACT 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 THE PROGRESS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH 2 3 SUMMARY SYNTHESIS OF PRE-EUROPEAN
    [Show full text]
  • Review West Coast Regional Coastal
    Review of West Coast Region Coastal Hazard Areas Prepared for West Coast Regional Council June 2012 Authors/Contributors: Richard Measures Helen Rouse For any information regarding this report please contact: Helen Rouse Resource Management Consultant +64-3-343 8037 [email protected] National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd 10 Kyle Street Riccarton Christchurch 8011 PO Box 8602, Riccarton Christchurch 8440 New Zealand Phone +64-3-348 8987 Fax +64-3-348 5548 NIWA Client Report No: CHC2012-081 Report date: June 2012 NIWA Project: ELF12226 © All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the copyright owner(s). Such permission is only to be given in accordance with the terms of the client’s contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Whilst NIWA has used all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, NIWA does not give any express or implied warranty as to the completeness of the information contained herein, or that it will be suitable for any purpose(s) other than those specifically contemplated during the Project or agreed by NIWA and the Client. Contents Executive summary .............................................................................................................. 5 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 6
    [Show full text]
  • Indicative UFB Rollout Timetable
    Indicative UFB rollout timetable The timing and order of the UFB rollout is based on workflow scheduling by UFB deployment partners and subject to change. It is in part based on the availability of contractors, as well as the need to build new network contiguously wherever possible. Crown Fibre Holdings will be working with partners to carry out more detailed planning over the coming months. Working with UFB deployment partners, we will achieve nationwide completion of the UFB programme by the end of 2022. Forecast Premises Deployment City / town / area Partner completion covered phase date* Northland Ahipara Chorus 534 2 2022* Awanui Chorus 171 2+ by 2022^ Baylys Beach Chorus 293 2+ by 2022^ Dargaville NFL 1,933 2 2018 Dargaville Fringe NFL 32 2+ by 2022^ Hihi Chorus 200 2+ by 2022^ Hikurangi NFL 579 2 2017 Kaikohe Chorus 1,543 2 2019* Kaitaia Chorus 2,041 2 2020* Kaiwaka NFL 200 2 2020 Kerikeri Chorus 2,540 2 2019* Langs Beach/Waipu Cove Chorus 545 2+ by 2022^ Mangawhai Heads NFL 1,988 2 2020 Mangawhai Village NFL 615 2 2019 Marsden Point/One Tree Point NFL 1,059 2 2018 Matapouri Chorus 308 2+ by 2022^ Maungakaramea Chorus 128 2+ by 2022^ Maungatapere Chorus 89 2+ by 2022^ Maungaturoto NFL 377 2 2020 Moerewa/Kawakawa Chorus 1,010 2 2018* Ngunguru Chorus 473 2+ by 2022^ Ohaeawai Chorus 127 2+ by 2022^ Opononi Chorus 504 2+ by 2022^ Opua/Okiato Chorus 145 2+ by 2022^ Paihia Chorus 1,314 2 2021* Paparoa NFL 133 2 2021 Portland Chorus 66 2+ by 2022^ Pukenui Chorus 199 2+ by 2022^ Rangitana Chorus 136 2+ by 2022^ Forecast Premises Deployment
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Westland Cultural Heritage Tourism Development Plan 1
    Overview of the Westland Cultural Heritage Tourism Development Plan 1. CULTURAL HERITAGE THEMES DEVELOPMENT • Foundation Māori Settlement Heritage Theme – Pounamu: To be developed by Poutini Ngāi Tahu with Te Ara Pounamu Project • Foundation Pākehā Settlement Heritage Theme – West Coast Rain Forest Wilderness Gold Rush • Hokitika - Gold Rush Port, Emporium and Administrative Capital actually on the goldfields • Ross – New Zealand’s most diverse goldfield in terms of types of gold deposits and mining methods • Cultural Themes – Artisans, Food, Products, Recreation derived from untamed, natural wilderness 2. TOWN ENVIRONMENT ENHANCEMENTS 2.1 Hokitika Revitalisation • Cultural Heritage Precincts, Walkways, Interpretation, Public Art and Tohu Whenua Site • Wayfinders and Directional Signs (English, Te Reo Māori, Chinese) 2.2 Ross Enhancement • Enhancement and Experience Plan Development • Wayfinders and Directional Signs (English, Te Reo Māori, Chinese) 3. COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT • Go Wild Hokitika and other businesses at TRENZ 2020 • Chinese Visitor Business Cluster • Mahinapua Natural and Cultural Heritage Iconic Attraction 4. COMMUNITY OWNED BUSINESSES AND ACTIVITIES • Westland Industrial Heritage Park Experience Development • Ross Goldfields Heritage Centre and Area Experience Development 5. MARKETING • April 2020 KUMARA JUNCTION to GREYMOUTH Taramakau 73 River Kapitea Creek Overview of the Westland CulturalCHESTERFIELD Heritage 6 KUMARA AWATUNA Londonderry West Coast Rock Tourism Development Plan Wilderness Trail German Gully
    [Show full text]