DOCSLIB.ORG

Pasternak Family Papers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf70000535 No online items Register of the Pasternak family papers Finding aid prepared by Olga Verhovskoy Dunlop and Lora Soroka Hoover Institution Archives 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA, 94305-6003 (650) 723-3563 [email protected] © 1998, 2007, 2015 Register of the Pasternak family 96063 1 papers Title: Pasternak family papers Date (inclusive): 1877-2013 Collection Number: 96063 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Archives Language of Material: Russian Physical Description: 160 manuscript boxes, 23 oversize boxes, 4 card file boxes, 1 phonotape cassette, 1 videotape cassette, digital files(108.2 linear feet) Abstract: Correspondence, diaries, memoirs, other writings, biographical data, printed matter, drawings, photographs, and other audiovisual material relating to Russian art and literature, culture in the Soviet Union, and Russian émigré life. Includes papers of Leonid and Rosalia Pasternak; their sons, the poet and novelist Boris Pasternak and architect and memoirist Aleksandr Pasternak; their daughters, Josephine Pasternak and Lydia Pasternak Slater; and other family members. Physical location: Hoover Institution Archives Language of the Materials : In Russian, English, German, French, and Italian. Creator: Pasternak family. Access Boxes 37, 44-49, and 53-59 closed; use copies available. The remainder of the collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Archives. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Pasternak family papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Archives. Acquisition Information Materials were acquired by the Hoover Institution Archives in 1996, 2004, and 2015. Accruals Materials may have been added to the collection since this finding aid was prepared. To determine if this has occurred, find the collection in Stanford University's online catalog at http://searchworks.stanford.edu/ . Materials have been added to the collection if the number of boxes listed in the catalog is larger than the number of boxes listed in this finding aid. Alternative Form Available In part, also available on microfilm (55 reels). Scope and Content of the Material The Pasternak family papers consist of material formerly in the possession of Josephine Pasternak and Lydia Pasternak Slater, the sisters of the poet and Nobel Prize winner Boris Pasternak. This material has been arranged into series corresponding to each member of the Pasternak family, including the poet's parents, Leonid and Rosalia, his sisters, Josephine Pasternak and Lydia Pasternak Slater, and his younger brother, Aleksandr. All but Boris and Aleksandr emigrated to Germany and subsequently to England after the 1917 Russian revolution. The resulting intimate correspondence, dating from the 1920s and 1930s, between Boris Pasternak, his parents, and his sisters is of primary importance. Also of interest are Josephine and Lydia's extensive correspondence with Pasternak literary scholars, family, and friends. The bulk of the collection concerns the work of Leonid Pasternak, a famous painter, and Josephine's and Lydia's efforts to preserve and publicize his legacy both in the Soviet Union and abroad. Included in this part are the artist's drawings and sketches, as well as working material and manuscripts prepared for the publication of his memoirs. Also of interst are Lydia Pasternak Slater's writings in Russian, German, and English and her translations. Olga Freidenberg, a niece of Leonid Pasternak, kept diaries/memoirs that give a full account of her school and university years, scholarly life, and the tragic siege of Leningrad, where she and her mother were living. The smaller archive related to Rosalia Kaufman-Pasternak, a well-known classical pianist, gives interesting insights into the world of Russian music in the years just before the revolution. The collection also includes materials from Lydia's children and Boris's son, Evgenii Pasternak. As a whole, the collection gives a valuable glimpse into the artistic and cultural life of Russia from the 1880s to the late 1970s as seen in the life and work of a multi-faceted and talented family. Subjects and Indexing Terms Pasternak, Boris Leonidovich,1890-1960. Register of the Pasternak family 96063 2 papers Pasternak, Leonid Osipovich, 1862-1945. Pasternak, Zh. L. (Zhozefina Leonidovna) Art--Russia. Audiotapes. Drawings. Russia. Russian literature. Russians in foreign countries. Soviet Union--Civilization. Soviet Union. Video tapes. Box 1-11; 134 LEONID PASTERNAK FILE 1885-1990 Scope and Contents note Biographical material, correspondence, notebooks and portfolios of drawings and miscellaneous material related to the exhibit and sale of his work; writings and other material used in the preparation of his memoirs; Russian and English drafts of the memoirs prepared by Josephine Pasternak; critical material and writings about Leonid Pasternak, arranged alphabetically by physical form. Includes photocopies of correspondence from Marina Tsvetaeva (originals in RESTRICTED SERIES). Box 1 Biographical material (see also: JOSEPHINE PASTERNAK FILE) Box/Folder 1:1 General, miscellaneous notes re genealogy of the Pasternak family. Handwritten undated Box/Folder 1:2 Recommendation from Maksimova (wife of Nikolai Maksimov). Holograph 1885 Box/Folder 1:3 Receipt from Louise Maude for illustrations to Lev Tolstoy's Resurrection. Photocopy 1902 Box/Folder 1:4 Affidavit from Narodnyi Komissariat po prosveshcheniiu signed by A. Lunacharskii re circumstances of Leonid Pasternak's going abroad. Typescript 1921 Box/Folder 1:5 Permit granted by the Narodnyi Komissariat po prosveshcheniiu to take abroad works of art listed in document. Typescript 1921 Box/Folder 1:6 Financial agreement re "Ursula" painting, Berlin. Typescript 1929 Box/Folder 1:7 Visiting card 1920s Box/Folder 1:8 Work permit, Great Britain, Home Office. Typescript 1939 Box/Folder 1:9 Testament. Holograph 1944 Clippings Art Scope and Contents note Includes articles about his art and reviews of exhibits. Box/Folder General 1889-1917 1:10-12 Box/Folder English 1:13-14 German Box/Folder 1:15 General Box/Folder 1:16 1924-1929 Box/Folder 1:17 1932-1942 Register of the Pasternak family 96063 3 papers LEONID PASTERNAK FILE 1885-1990 Clippings Box/Folder Russian 1:18-19 Box/Folder 1:20 Miscellany Memoirs Scope and Contents note Includes excerpts published in the periodical press and reviews. Box/Folder 1:21 English Box/Folder 1:22 German Box/Folder 1:23 Russian Box 2 Correspondence Incoming General Box/Folder 2:1 1925-1937 Box/Folder 2:2 1938-1942 Box/Folder 2:3 Barou, N. 1941 Box/Folder 2:4 Braz, O. 1929-1936 Box/Folder 2:5 Corinth, Lovis 1923 Box/Folder 2:6 Deutsche Bücherei, 1932 Box/Folder 2:7 Ehrenburg, Il'ia and Liubov undated Box/Folder 2:8 Ettinger, Pavel 1930-1945 Scope and Contents note Includes letters of condolence at Leonid Pasternak's death. Box/Folder 2:9 Freidenberg, Ol'ga 1920s?-1929 Box/Folder 2:10 Liebermann, Max 1932 Box/Folder 2:11 Lob, Martha 1941-1944 Box/Folder 2:12 Lur'e, B. 1943 Box/Folder 2:13 L'vov, Aleksei 1932-1936 Box/Folder 2:14 Maiskii, Agniia and Vasilii (see also: Soviet Union, Posol'stvo (Great Britain)) 1943 Box/Folder 2:15 Pasternak, Evgeniia 1927-1931 Scope and Contents note Includes letters to all members of the Pasternak family. Pasternak, Fedor and Josephine Box/Folder 2:16 Undated Box/Folder 2:17 1921-1930 Box/Folder 2:18 Pasternak, Lydia 1927 Box/Folder 2:19 Polenov, Nikolai 1928 Box/Folder 2:20 Remizov, Aleksei 1923 Box/Folder 2:21 Repin, Il'ia 1927-1929 Box/Folder 2:22 Samuel, Herbert 1924-1938 Box/Folder 2:23 Serova, Nataliia 1927 Box/Folder 2:24 Serova, Ol'ga 1926-1927 Box/Folder 2:25 Shaliapin, Fedor 1929 Box/Folder 2:26 Société du Musée Léon Tolstoï, 1909 Box/Folder 2:27 Soiuz Russkikh Khudozhnikov undated Box/Folder 2:28 Soviet Union, Posol'stvo (Great Britain) 1942-1945 Scope and Contents note Includes letters from and drafts of answers to Vasilii Zonov and S. Rostovskii. Box/Folder 2:29 Struck, Hermann 1942-1944 Box/Folder 2:30 Sukhotina-Tolstaia, Tatiana 1934-1935 Register of the Pasternak family 96063 4 papers LEONID PASTERNAK FILE 1885-1990 Correspondence Box/Folder 2:31 Tolstoy, Lev 1904 General Physical Description note: Holograph and typescript copies. Box/Folder 2:32 Tsvetaeva, Marina 1922-1928 Scope and Contents note Includes draft of answer in Rosalia Pasternak's hand and explanatory note by Josephine Pasternak. Box/Folder 2:33 Vinogradov, Sergei 1923-1930 Zonov, Vasilii, Ambassador of the U.S.S.R. to Great Britain (see: Soviet Union, Posol'stvo (Great Britain)) Outgoing Box/Folder 2:34 Surname unknown 1923-1944 Box/Folder 2:35 Uchilishche ZHivopisi, Vaianiia I Zodchestva undated Critical material and writings about Leonid Pasternak General Miscellaneous short biographies Box/Folder 2:36 Printed Box/Folder 2:37 Typescript Box/Folder 2:38 "Jacobs Segen," review of Rembrandt exhibit. Printed proof undated Box/Folder 2:39 "Professor Pasternak on the Jewish Art Expedition," P.T.A. Bulletin. Mimeograph 1924 Box/Folder 2:40 Ben-Jischai, A., "Mit Leonid Pasternak in Jerusalem." Holograph 1959 Box/Folder 2:41 Bialik, Hayyim, draft of "Monographie." Holograph 1922 Box/Folder 2:42 Buckman, David, Leonid Pasternak: A Russian Impressionist, Maltzahn Gallery Ltd. Printed copy 1974 Box/Folder 2:43 Bulgakov, V., "L. O. Pasternak," Iskusstvo. Clipping 1961 Box/Folder 2:44 Gibian, George, "Doctor Zhivago, Russia, and Leonid Pasternak's Rembrandt." Printed copy (see also: JOSEPHINE PASTERNAK FILE, Correspondence, Rimgaila Salys for commentary) 1983 Box/Folder 2:45 Gurdus, Luba, "The Forgotten Friendship: L.O. Pasternak and A.J. Stybel," The First Jewish Art Annual. Printed copy 1980 Scope and Contents note Includes annotations by Josephine Pasternak. Box/Folder 2:46 Mallac, Guy de, "A Russian Impressionist: Leonid Osipovich Pasternak, 1862-1945," California Slavic Studies.
Recommended publications
  • Le Non-Lieu Comme Raison D'être De Susana Soca

    Le Non-Lieu Comme Raison D'être De Susana Soca

    LA PARATOPIE AU CENTRE : LE NON-LIEU COMME RAISON D’ÊTRE DE SUSANA SOCA Valentina LITVAN Université Paris 8, LI.RI.CO (EA 3055) « L’écrivain n’a pas lieu d’être […] et doit construire le territoire de son œuvre à travers cette faille même » (MAINGUENEAU, 2004 : 85). Cette définition de Dominique Maingueneau contient le paradoxe selon lequel l’identité de l’écrivain émerge de son non-lieu. Un non-lieu qui n’est pas textuel (la mort de l’auteur proclamée par Barthes), ni contextuel (dans une allusion purement sociologique à la condition marginale de l’écrivain). Car Maingueneau propose la notion de paratopie pour dépasser précisément le dualisme entre texte et contexte, œuvre et écrivain : « […] faire œuvre, c’est produire une œuvre et construire par là même les conditions qui permettent de la produire » (MAINGUENEAU, 2004 : 86). L’écrivain se construit en construisant son œuvre, dans laquelle, paradoxalement, il disparaît. L’auteur se construit ainsi par son œuvre, à partir du non-lieu. À partir de cette problématique du non-lieu comme trait fondamental de la paratopie, nous allons exposer le cas particulier de Susana Soca. Figure méconnue de la littérature uruguayenne, son existence dans le champ littéraire semble se légitimer précisément par un non- lieu constant et ce, à différents niveaux de la production littéraire. Nous présenterons d’abord l’auteur, pour décrire ensuite quatre traits paratopiques qui la/le définissent et, finalement, essayer de démontrer que la paratopie, caractérisée par l’instabilité et le non-lieu, confère une place centrale à cette figure dans la tradition littéraire dont elle fait partie.
  • Exorcising Stalin's Ghost

    Exorcising Stalin's Ghost

    TURNING BACK TOTALITARIANISM: Exorcising Stalin’s Ghost Matthew R. Newton The Evergreen State College N e w t o n | 1 "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." --George Orwell The death of Joseph Stalin left the Soviet Union in a state of dynastic confusion, and the most repressive elements of the society he established remained. After Nikita Khrushchev secured power in the mid-1950s, he embarked on a campaign to vanquish these elements. While boldly denouncing Stalin’s cult of personality and individual authority in his ‘Secret Speech’ of 1956, he failed to address the problems of a system that allowed Stalin to take power and empowered legions of Stalin-enablers. Khrushchev’s problem was complex in that he wanted to appease the entire Communist Party of the Soviet Union in 1956 and yet legitimize his position of power. The level of embeddedness of Stalinism in the Soviet Union was the biggest obstacle for Khrushchev. Characterized with the “permanent” infrastructure of the Soviet Union, Stalin’s autocratic rule was intertwined with virtually all aspects of Soviet life. These aspects can be broken down into four elements: Stalin’s status as an absolute champion of Communism, and his cult of personality; the enormous amount of propaganda in all forms that underlined Stalin as the “protector” of the Soviet Union during threat and impact of foreign war, and the censorship of any content that was not aligned with this mindset; the necessity and place of the Gulag prison camp in the Soviet economy, and how it sustained itself; and the transformation of Soviet society into something horrifically uniform and populated with citizens whom were universally fearful of arrest and arbitrary repression.
  • ALEXIS PERI Department of History Boston University 226 Bay State Rd

    ALEXIS PERI Department of History Boston University 226 Bay State Rd

    ALEXIS PERI Department of History Boston University 226 Bay State Rd. Boston, MA 02215 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2019-current Associate Professor of History, Boston University Spring 2020 Visiting Associate Professor of History, University of California, Berkeley 2014-19 Assistant Professor of History, Boston University 2011-14 Assistant Professor of History, Middlebury College 2011 Lecturer, Saint Mary’s College of California ADDITIONAL EMPLOYMENT 2002-04 Administrative Assistant & Interview Auditor, Regional Oral History Office, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley EDUCATION 2011 Ph.D., History, University of California, Berkeley Awarded Distinction 2006 M.A., History, University of California, Berkeley 2002 B.A., History, Psychology, University of California, Berkeley Awarded Highest Achievement in General Scholarship PUBLICATIONS Books: The War Within: Diaries from the Siege of Leningrad. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2017. Polish-Language Edition: Leningrad: Dzienniki z obezonego miasta. Siwek Grzegorz, trans. Krakow: Spoleczny Instytut Wydawniczy Znak, 2019. Awards: Peri 1 of 14 Winner, Pushkin House Russian Book Prize, 2018 (“supports the best non-fiction writing in English on the Russian-speaking world”) http://www.pushkinhouse.org/2018-winner/ Winner, University of Southern California Book Prize in Literary and Cultural Studies, 2018 (“for an outstanding monograph published on Russia, Eastern Europe or Eurasia in the fields of literary and cultural studies”) https://www.aseees.org/programs/aseees-prizes/usc-book-prize-literary-and-
  • Boris Pasternak - Poems

    Boris Pasternak - Poems

    Classic Poetry Series Boris Pasternak - poems - Publication Date: 2012 Publisher: Poemhunter.com - The World's Poetry Archive Boris Pasternak(10 February 1890 - 30 May 1960) Boris Leonidovich Pasternak was a Russian language poet, novelist, and literary translator. In his native Russia, Pasternak's anthology My Sister Life, is one of the most influential collections ever published in the Russian language. Furthermore, Pasternak's theatrical translations of Goethe, Schiller, Pedro Calderón de la Barca, and William Shakespeare remain deeply popular with Russian audiences. Outside Russia, Pasternak is best known for authoring Doctor Zhivago, a novel which spans the last years of Czarist Russia and the earliest days of the Soviet Union. Banned in the USSR, Doctor Zhivago was smuggled to Milan and published in 1957. Pasternak was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature the following year, an event which both humiliated and enraged the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. In the midst of a massive campaign against him by both the KGB and the Union of Soviet Writers, Pasternak reluctantly agreed to decline the Prize. In his resignation letter to the Nobel Committee, Pasternak stated the reaction of the Soviet State was the only reason for his decision. By the time of his death from lung cancer in 1960, the campaign against Pasternak had severely damaged the international credibility of the U.S.S.R. He remains a major figure in Russian literature to this day. Furthermore, tactics pioneered by Pasternak were later continued, expanded, and refined by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and other Soviet dissidents. <b>Early Life</b> Pasternak was born in Moscow on 10 February, (Gregorian), 1890 (Julian 29 January) into a wealthy Russian Jewish family which had been received into the Russian Orthodox Church.
  • Twentieth Century Latin American Architecture: a Network and a Digital Exhibition Hugo SEGAWA University of Sao Paulo

    Twentieth Century Latin American Architecture: a Network and a Digital Exhibition Hugo SEGAWA University of Sao Paulo

    <Presentations Day1>Twentieth Century Latin American Title Architecture: a Network and a Digital Exhibition Author(s) SEGAWA, Hugo CIRAS discussion paper No.81 : Architectural and Planning Citation Cultures Across Regions --Digital Humanities Collaboration Towards Knowledge Integration (2018), 81: 8-17 Issue Date 2018-03 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/CIRASDP_81_8 © Center for Information Resources of Area Studies, Kyoto Right University Type Research Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University Presentations / Day1 Twentieth Century Latin American Architecture: a Network and a Digital Exhibition Hugo SEGAWA University of Sao Paulo designed by the architect Horiguchi Sutemi and built inside the Ibirapuera Park in Sao Paulo city in 1954, on the occasion of the 4th centennial of the foundation of the city of São Paulo. This, and other examples of forgotten or unknown facts of how ar- chitectural exchanges and the architectural culture in Brazil was shaped, demonstrate that this kind of database is an important tool for research, and would be especially useful for data mining analysis. The Observatório de Arquitectura Latinoamer- icana Contemporánea – ODALC (Observatory of As representative of a joint research group, a Contemporary Latin American Architecture) is a network dedicated to the study of the Modern Latin network of researchers of the University of São American Architecture, the invitation to be in this Paulo (Brazil), Universidad Nacional (Colombia) symposium came in an important moment of discus- and Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (Mexi- sion and decision regarding the use of digital tools co) dedicated to the study of contemporary Latin and data bases within the activities of the group, al- American architecture and cities since 2011.
  • 'Socialism in One Country': Komsomol'tsy

    'Socialism in One Country': Komsomol'tsy

    Youthful Internationalism in the Age of ‘Socialism in One Country’: Komsomol’tsy, Pioneers and ‘World Revolution’ in the Interwar Period Matthias Neumann On the 1st of March 1927, two Komsomol members from the Chuvash Republic, located in the centre of European Russia, wrote an emotional letter to Comrade Stalin. Reflecting on the revolutionary upheavals in China, they attacked the inaction of the Komsomol and the party and expressed their sincere determination to self-mobilise and join the proletarian forces in China. ‘We do not need empty slogans such as “The Komsomol is prepared”’, ‘We must not live like this’ they wrote and boasted ‘we guarantee that we are able to mobilise thousands of Komsomol members who have the desire to go to China and fight in the army of the Guomindang.’ This was after all, they forcefully stressed, the purpose for which ‘our party and our Komsomol exist.’1 These youngsters were not alone in their views. As the coverage on the situation in China intensified in the Komsomol press in March, numerous similar individual and collective letters were received by party and Komsomol leaders.2 The young authors, all male as far as they were named, expressed their genuine enthusiasm for the revolution in China. The letters revealed not only a youthful romanticism for the revolutionary fight abroad and the idea of spreading the revolution, but often an underlying sense of disillusionment with the inertia of the revolutionary project at home. A few months earlier, in 1926 during the campaign against the so-called eseninshchina3, a fellow Komsomol member took a quite different view on the prospect of spreading the revolution around the world.
  • Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18

    Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18

    Moscow 4 There are more than 3000 museums (and about 72 000 museum workers) in Russian Moscow region 92 Federation, not including school and company museums. Every year Russian museums visit more than 80 million visitors, 1/3 of who are visitors under 18 There are about 650 individual and institutional members in ICOM Russia. During two last St. Petersburg 117 years ICOM Russia membership was rapidly increasing more than 20% (or about 100 new members) a year Northwestern region 160 You will find the information aboutICOM Russia members in this book. All members (individual and institutional) are divided in two big groups – Museums which are institutional members of ICOM or are represented by individual members and Organizations. All the museums in this book are distributed by regional principle. Organizations are structured in profile groups Central region 192 Volga river region 224 Many thanks to all the museums who offered their help and assistance in the making of this collection South of Russia 258 Special thanks to Urals 270 Museum creation and consulting Culture heritage security in Russia with 3M(tm)Novec(tm)1230 Siberia and Far East 284 © ICOM Russia, 2012 Organizations 322 © K. Novokhatko, A. Gnedovsky, N. Kazantseva, O. Guzewska – compiling, translation, editing, 2012 [email protected] www.icom.org.ru © Leo Tolstoy museum-estate “Yasnaya Polyana”, design, 2012 Moscow MOSCOW A. N. SCRiAbiN MEMORiAl Capital of Russia. Major political, economic, cultural, scientific, religious, financial, educational, and transportation center of Russia and the continent MUSEUM Highlights: First reference to Moscow dates from 1147 when Moscow was already a pretty big town.
  • Soviet Political Memoirs: a Study in Politics and Literature

    Soviet Political Memoirs: a Study in Politics and Literature

    SOVIET POLITICAL MEMOIRS: A STUDY IN POLITICS AND LITERATURE by ZOI LAKKAS B.A. HONS, The University of Western Ontario, 1990 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of History) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA June 1992 Zoi Lakkas, 1992 _________________ in presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department. or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. V Department of The University of British &‘olumbia Vancouver, Canada Date 1L4( /1 1q2 DE-6 (2/88) ii ABS TRACT A growing number of Soviet political memoirs have emerged from the former Soviet Union. The main aim of the meinoirists is to give their interpretation of the past. Despite the personal insight that these works provide on Soviet history, Western academics have not studied them in any detail. The principal aim of this paper is to prove Soviet political memoir’s importance as a research tool. The tight link between politics and literature characterizes the nature of Soviet political memoir. All forms of Soviet literature had to reform their brand of writing as the Kremlin’s policies changed from Stalin’s ruthless reign to Gorbachev’s period of openness.
  • Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

    Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

    SPECIAL REPORT AMERICA, WE EG YOU TO INTERFER by Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn ARTHUR R/\OTKE PRESIDENT lhe Cincinnati Air Conditioning Co. • CHURCH LEAGUE OF AMERICA 422 NORTH PROSPECT STREET WHEATON, ILLINOIS 60187 AUGUST 1975 . First Printing August 1975 Second Printing October 1975 INTRODUCTION The Church League of America believes it is imperative that the two major addresses which Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn made re­ cently in Washington, D.C., and in New York City under the spon­ sorship of AFL-CIO be distributed as widely as possible across the nation and be digested by every American who has one grain of common sense left in his brain, and one spark of patriotism left in his soul, that each one communicate these two messages to every­ one who lives within the same block in his community, and get others to do the same, so that Solzhenitsyn:'s warnings may be spread to millions across America. This warning must shake our nation out of its lethargy until its teeth rattle and bring about a change in our present disastrous national policy of detente; and give hope to the millions of enslaved behind the Iron and Bamboo Curtains as America rises and says: "We oppose Communism in all of its forms and devices and will not give one cent or one speck of technological know-how to any Communist nation from this momenton. We will re-assume the anti-Communist leadership of the Free World re­ gardless of the hypocritical critics, the cowards and the mentally sick intelligensia!" 'America, We Beg You to Interfere' by Aleksandr I.
  • SOVIET YOUTH FILMS UNDER BREZHNEV: WATCHING BETWEEN the LINES by Olga Klimova Specialist Degree, Belarusian State University

    SOVIET YOUTH FILMS UNDER BREZHNEV: WATCHING BETWEEN the LINES by Olga Klimova Specialist Degree, Belarusian State University

    SOVIET YOUTH FILMS UNDER BREZHNEV: WATCHING BETWEEN THE LINES by Olga Klimova Specialist degree, Belarusian State University, 2001 Master of Arts, Brock University, 2005 Master of Arts, University of Pittsburgh, 2007 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH THE KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Olga Klimova It was defended on May 06, 2013 and approved by David J. Birnbaum, Professor, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, University of Pittsburgh Lucy Fischer, Distinguished Professor, Department of English, University of Pittsburgh Vladimir Padunov, Associate Professor, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, University of Pittsburgh Aleksandr Prokhorov, Associate Professor, Department of Modern Languages and Literatures, College of William and Mary, Virginia Dissertation Advisor: Nancy Condee, Professor, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, University of Pittsburgh ii Copyright © by Olga Klimova 2013 iii SOVIET YOUTH FILMS UNDER BREZHNEV: WATCHING BETWEEN THE LINES Olga Klimova, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2013 The central argument of my dissertation emerges from the idea that genre cinema, exemplified by youth films, became a safe outlet for Soviet filmmakers’ creative energy during the period of so-called “developed socialism.” A growing interest in youth culture and cinema at the time was ignited by a need to express dissatisfaction with the political and social order in the country under the condition of intensified censorship. I analyze different visual and narrative strategies developed by the directors of youth cinema during the Brezhnev period as mechanisms for circumventing ideological control over cultural production.
  • Nombre Autor

    Nombre Autor

    ANUARI DE FILOLOGIA. LLENGÜES I LITERATURES MODERNES (Anu.Filol.Lleng.Lit.Mod.) 9/2019, pp. 53-57, ISSN: 2014-1394, DOI: 10.1344/AFLM2019.9.4 PUSHKIN – «DON JUAN» IN THE INTERPRETATION OF P. HUBER AND M. ARMALINSKIY TATIANA SHEMETOVA M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0003-3342-8508 ABSTRACT This article is devoted to the description of the two mythologemes of Pushkin myth (PM). According to the first, the great Russian poet secretly loved one woman all his life and dedicated many unattributed poems to her. This is the mythologeme of Pushkin’s hidden love. The other side of the myth is based on the “Ushakova’s Album” (her personal notebook for her friends’ poetries), in which the poet joked down the names of all his beloveds (Don Juan List). On the basis of this document, the literary critic P. Guber and the “publisher” of Pushkin’s Secret Notes, M. Armalinsky, make ambiguous conclusions and give a new life to Pushkin myth in the 20-21st centuries. KEYWORDS: the myth of Pushkin, hidden love, Russian literature of the twentieth century, “Don Juan of Pushkin,” Pushkin’s Secret Notes, P. Guber, M. Armalinsky. INTRODUCTION: THE STATE OF THE QUESTION The application of the concept “Pushkin myth” (PM) is very diverse, which sometimes leads to an unreasonable expansion of the meaning of the term. Like any myth (ancient or modern), the PM is a plot that develops from episodes- mythologemes. In this article we will review two mythologemes of the PM: “monogamous Pushkin” and “Pushkin – Don Juan (i.
  • Lettre D'info

    Lettre D'info

    M R SH Lettre d’info NORMANDIE - CAEN Maison de la Recherche en Sciences Humaines Numéro 135 - Mai 2013 CNRS - UNIVERSITÉ DE CAEN en ligne ce mois-ci Mécénat de la Fondation Nationale Crédit http://www.unicaen.fr/recherche/mrsh/forge Agricole et du Crédit Agricole de Normandie, soutien du Ministère de la Culture et du Minis- La forge numérique tère de l’Agriculture à la restauration et à la nu- héberge et diffuse tousdocuments mul- timédia (photos, vidéos, fichiers son) relatifs à l’acti- mérisation intelligente de la bibliothèque his- vité scientifique de la Maison de la Recherche en torique du Ministère de l’Agriculture Sciences Humaines (MRSH) et des équipes qui y sont associées. Enregistrements audio ou vidéo de col- Forte de 25 000 volumes du loques, conférences, photos de terrains, entretiens de début du XVIIe siècle à la fin du chercheurs, présentation d’ouvrages par leurs auteurs XXe siècle, la Bibliothèque du alimentent régulièrement ce réservoir numérique. Ministère de l’agriculture est un patrimoine d’exception. C’est aussi un magnifique outil de � écouter recherche. En septembre 2004, le Ministère a décidé de la confier à la Maison de la Recherche en l’économie informelle dans les grands ports Sciences Humaines (MRSH) CNRS Université de Caen Basse-Nor- Laurence MonteL mandie en raison de l’excellence de sa recherche et de sa capacité géographies. Épistémologie et histoire des à l’ouvrir au public des chercheurs et au grand public. savoirs sur l’espace Conçu comme un outil de travail et alimenté par des achats, des PascaL Clerc dons et des dépôts depuis le règne de Louis XV jusqu’à la Ve Répu- blique, ce fonds est constitué d’ouvrages et de revues en lien avec la guerre de madeleine les thématiques agricoles et rurales (traités, atlas, statistiques,- re MadeLeine ClervaL cueils de pratiques, concours agricoles, rapports, thèses, manuels, monographies, etc.).