DOCSLIB.ORG

Hay Point Peat Mine Development Proposal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hay Point Peat Mine Development Proposal Sun Gro Horticulture Canada Ltd. Hay Point Peat Mine Development October, 2011 Manitoba Environment Act Proposal – Final 10-0293-01 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Kontzamanis Graumann Smith MacMillan Inc. (KGS Group) was contracted by Sun Gro Horticulture Canada Ltd. (Sun Gro) to prepare a Manitoba Environment Act Proposal (EAP) for the proposed peat mining development at Hay Point Bog. Sun Gro would like to obtain an Environmental Act Licence for peat harvesting operations at the Hay Point Bog. The proposed peat mine development will not likely result in significant adverse environmental effects, based on the available information for this project, the environment, the assessment of environmental effects outlined in this environmental assessment report, and application of proposed mitigation measures, including conducting the required follow-up. Sun Gro is the largest producer of peat moss in North America and the largest distributor of peat moss and peat-based growing media products. In order to sustain their current needs it is necessary to develop bog sites in the Interlake region for future peat moss harvesting. Sun Gro had secured these leases approximately 16 years ago in anticipation of this future need. The purpose of the proposed development is to continue to provide quality peat-based growing media products to meet the demand of their distribution network in over 40 countries worldwide. The scope of the project includes planning, designing, constructing, operating, maintaining and eventual decommissioning and restoration of the proposed peat development at Hay Point Bog. The scope of the assessment included identification, assessment and mitigation of adverse environmental effects of the project, and evaluation of the significance of residual environmental effects. The scope of the assessment also included consideration of direct and indirect biophysical and socio-economic effects, including cumulative environmental effects. The Class 2 peat mining development will include an access road, bog roads, drainage ditch system with settling ponds and an on-site facility and equipment storage area. Major project activities include providing access, clearing vegetation and surface soils, harvesting and stockpiling unprocessed peat, excavating and trenching, transporting peat and restoring harvested peatland. The environmental assessment of the proposed peat development was carried out based on project information provided by Sun Gro and the advice document from Manitoba Conservation. Additional considerations included environmental information acquired from literature, internet searches, and publications by the peat industry and environmental organizations; contacts with federal and provincial government representatives; consultations with stakeholders; and site investigations by the project team. Information regarding the proposed peat development project has been provided to stakeholders in the region through various means, including phone conversations and letters. Stakeholders included Manitoba Conservation (in particular Parks and Natural Areas Branch), Grindstone Cottage Owners Association, Hecla Oasis Resort, Hecla Tourism Association, Rural Municipality (RM) of Bifrost and Peguis First Nation. Concerns expressed by the stakeholders and mitigation measures to address these have been discussed throughout this EAP. i Sun Gro Horticulture Canada Ltd. Hay Point Peat Mine Development October, 2011 Manitoba Environment Act Proposal – Final 10-0293-01 Potential environmental effects of the proposed peat mine development were identified using scoping methods, interaction matrix techniques, public comments, advice from specialists and professional judgment. Effects of accidents and malfunctions, effects of the environment on the project and cumulative environmental effects were also determined. Mitigation measures were identified to eliminate, reduce and control environmental effects determined to be adverse. Follow-up was proposed to verify the accuracy of the assessment and determine the effectiveness of the mitigation measures. Significance of the residual environmental effects remaining after mitigation was then evaluated. Potential adverse environmental effects of the proposed peat mine development assessed to be major in the environmental assessment included the loss and disturbance of soil (harvested peat), risk of fire (and explosions), and potential for accidents during the transportation of peat. Additional environmental effects assessed to be potentially moderate included; increased dust and particulates; modified drainage pattern; increased sediment levels in surface water; change in receiving water quality; disturbance of fish habitat; loss of wetlands and herpetile habitat; clearing of vegetation; loss of wildlife habitat; contamination of soil and surface water; increased traffic and the associated public attitude. Positive effects identified included improvements in economic conditions, business opportunities and employment, as well as an increase in dust control and, during restoration, an increase in diversity of flora and fauna. With mitigation and follow-up, the residual effects of the project for all of the potential adverse effects were determined to be not significant. There are no known historic resources or federally protected endangered plants and animals in the vicinity of the proposed peat mine development area. Mitigation for potential adverse effects identified for the proposed peat mine development included a wide variety of design and proposed measures, regulatory requirements and management practices. Some of the more important mitigation measures to address the adverse effects included: • Minimizing surface area disturbed and leaving non-commercial peat reserves in place; • Draining water to sedimentation ponds and discharging to the existing drainage system; • Instructing employees on proper harvest equipment operation to minimize dust; • Moistening stockpiles, regular removal of stockpiled materials and covering loads being hauled from the site; • Using low sulphur fuels, muffling vehicles and equipment, and requiring a high standard of maintenance of vehicles and equipment and limiting unnecessary long-term idling; • Preventing leaks, spills and releases and requiring drip trays for equipment and secondary containment for fuel storage; • Designating fuel storage and re-fueling areas and providing spill clean-up equipment and materials; • Preparing and regular updates of emergency response plan including fire; and • Implementing a mine closure plan to restore vegetation, surface water to predevelopment conditions; • Ensure workers are aware of provincially rare orchid species outside of development area. ii Sun Gro Horticulture Canada Ltd. Hay Point Peat Mine Development October, 2011 Manitoba Environment Act Proposal – Final 10-0293-01 Follow-up identified for the proposed peat mine development included a variety of inspecting, monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements. Proposed inspection involves periodic observations of the project and local areas for microclimatic changes, dust accumulation, VOC sources, leaks, spills and releases, potential soil contamination, noise levels, surface water runoff, erosion and maintenance of re-vegetated areas. Proposed monitoring includes periodic sampling of surface water quality as required and semi-annual monitoring of surface water quality. Record keeping includes maintaining operation files, documentation related to mitigation measures and follow-up implemented such as the mine closure plan and tracking public complaints. Reporting requirements for the proposed peat mine development will be placed in the public registry for the project and an annual summary of the detailed reports filed immediately following incidents that require implementation of the emergency response plan. The proposed peat mine development project will not likely result in significant adverse environmental effects, based on the available information on the project and the environment, the assessment of environmental effects outlined in this environmental assessment report, and the application of proposed mitigation measures and conducting of required follow-up. iii Sun Gro Horticulture Canada Ltd. Hay Point Peat Mine Development October, 2011 Manitoba Environment Act Proposal – Final 10-0293-01 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................. i 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 1 1.1 CORPORATE INFORMATION ......................................................................... 1 1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.................................................................. 2 1.3 PREVIOUS STUDIES AND ACTIVITIES.......................................................... 2 1.4 REPORT ORGANIZATION............................................................................... 2 2.0 SCOPE................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 SCOPE OF THE PROJECT.............................................................................. 5 2.2 SCOPE OF THE ASSESSMENT...................................................................... 5 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................... 7 3.1 OVERVIEW......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bryology with Dr. Robin Wall Kimmerer Ologies Podcast June 30, 2020
    Bryology with Dr. Robin Wall Kimmerer Ologies Podcast June 30, 2020 Oh Heeey, it’s the guy on Nextdoor who’s like, “Does anyone want some zucchinis?” because no one warned him that unattended zucchinis can grow to be the size of a human baby, Alie Ward, back with an instant classic episode of Ologies. This is an episode you’re going to listen to more than once, I’m gonna tell you right now. Not because the subject matter demands it for comprehension, but because it is the very ethos of Ologies all wrapped up in the most soothing, mellow audio hug you will ever lay ears on. It’s overlooked beauty. It’s following bliss. It’s myth-busting. [grunt of there being no words in the English language to encapsulate how amazing this episode is] Let me just run through the thanks and get to the show. Thank you to all the supporters at Patreon.com/Ologies. You can join for as little as a buck a month and submit questions - perhaps hear yours asked in future episodes. Thanks to everyone wearing Ologies shirts, hats, bikinis, and new face coverings at OlogiesMerch.com. Link is in the show notes. Tag yourself in #OlogiesMerch on Instagram. We’ll repost you. Thanks to everyone who rates, subscribes, and leaves reviews. I read all of them. They help Ologies stay at the top of the science charts. Thank you, ilikecheeserich, who wrote: Not only is information put in accessible language, but it also opens up your eyes to all the wonderful things there are to know and do in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Perennials for Winter Gardens Perennials for Winter Gardens
    TheThe AmericanAmerican GARDENERGARDENER® TheThe MagazineMagazine ofof thethe AAmericanmerican HorticulturalHorticultural SocietySociety November / December 2010 Perennials for Winter Gardens Edible Landscaping for Small Spaces A New Perspective on Garden Cleanup Outstanding Conifers contents Volume 89, Number 6 . November / December 2010 FEATURES DEPARTMENTS 5 NOTES FROM RIVER FARM 6 MEMBERS’ FORUM 8 NEWS FROM THE AHS Boston’s garden contest grows to record size, 2011 AHS President’s Council trip planned for Houston, Gala highlights, rave reviews for Armitage webinar in October, author of article for The American Gardener receives garden-writing award, new butterfly-themed children’s garden installed at River Farm. 12 2010 AMERICA IN BLOOM AWARD WINNERS Twelve cities are recognized for their community beautification efforts. 42 ONE ON ONE WITH… David Karp: Fruit detective. page 26 44 HOMEGROWN HARVEST The pleasures of popcorn. EDIBLE LANDSCAPING FOR SMALL SPACES 46 GARDENER’S NOTEBOOK 14 Replacing pavement with plants in San BY ROSALIND CREASY Francisco, soil bacterium may boost cognitive With some know-how, you can grow all sorts of vegetables, fruits, function, study finds fewer plant species on and herbs in small spaces. earth now than before, a fungus-and-virus combination may cause honeybee colony collapse disorder, USDA funds school garden CAREFREE MOSS BY CAROLE OTTESEN 20 program, Park Seed sold, Rudbeckia Denver Looking for an attractive substitute for grass in a shady spot? Try Daisy™ wins grand prize in American moss; it’ll grow on you. Garden Award Contest. 50 GREEN GARAGE® OUTSTANDING CONIFERS BY RITA PELCZAR 26 A miscellany of useful garden helpers. This group of trees and shrubs is beautiful year round, but shines brightest in winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report
    U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park, Maine Project Report Revised Edition – October 2003 Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U. S. Department of the Interior, U. S. Geological Survey. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park, Maine Sara Lubinski and Kevin Hop U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center and Susan Gawler Maine Natural Areas Program This report produced by U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center 2630 Fanta Reed Road La Crosse, Wisconsin 54603 and Maine Natural Areas Program Department of Conservation 159 Hospital Street 93 State House Station Augusta, Maine 04333-0093 In conjunction with Mike Story (NPS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) NPS, Natural Resources Information Division, Inventory and Monitoring Program Karl Brown (USGS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) USGS, Center for Biological Informatics and Revised Edition - October 2003 USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park Contacts U.S. Department of Interior United States Geological Survey - Biological Resources Division Website: http://www.usgs.gov U.S. Geological Survey Center for Biological Informatics P.O. Box 25046 Building 810, Room 8000, MS-302 Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225-0046 Website: http://biology.usgs.gov/cbi Karl Brown USGS Program Coordinator - USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Phone: (303) 202-4240 E-mail: [email protected] Susan Stitt USGS Remote Sensing and Geospatial Technologies Specialist USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Phone: (303) 202-4234 E-mail: [email protected] Kevin Hop Principal Investigator U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Moss Grower's Handbook
    Original publication details: Text and illustrations © by the author ISBN 0 9517176 0 X Printed by SevenTy Press 70 South Street Reading Berkshire RG1 4RA February 1991 This August 2005 [minor corrections 2 March 2006] Acrobat version is based on the text of the last Microsoft Word version (‘2nd edition in prep.’, postscripted ‘spring 2003’) by Michael Fletcher, that was previously available via the BBS website. No substantial changes have been made to this text. It uses the illustrations (including a re-scanned cover) of the printed 1991 first edition, and adheres as closely as possible to that format and its characteristic individualities. The index has been regenerated, using taxa and selected other words largely following Fletcher, although some words have proved impracticable to index and others have been added. The list of contents has also been regenerated, and both are now hyperlinked. This version was edited, adapted and updated (taxonomic names and references) for the British Bryological Society’s website, by Sean Edwards, with many thanks to Roy Perry for proof-reading and general suggestions. Contents Page 1 Introduction 2 1. Large common liverworts Finding and growing Marchantia, Lunularia and Conocephalum. 4 2. Bags, jars & sandwich boxes Short-term ways of keeping mosses alive. 5 3. Sphagnum Where to find them, how to grow them. A few common species. 8 4. Polytrichum and other large mosses Four common species. Lime accumulation, its causes & remedies. 11 5. Garden mosses. Attitudes to gardening. Recording and recognising the most likely species, how to grow them. Creating outdoor moss habitats. 19 6. Acid woodland mosses & hepatics Notes on 30 species, including 10 hepatics, with cultural needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Inventories of Schoodic and Corea Peninsulas, Coastal Maine, 1996
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Biology and Ecology Faculty Scholarship School of Biology and Ecology 6-30-1999 Biological Inventories of Schoodic and Corea Peninsulas, Coastal Maine, 1996 Willaim E. Glanz Bruce Connery Norman Famous Glen Mittelhauser Melissa Perera See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/bio_facpub Part of the Life Sciences Commons, and the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology and Ecology Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Willaim E. Glanz, Bruce Connery, Norman Famous, Glen Mittelhauser, Melissa Perera, Marcia Spencer- Famous, and Guthrie Zimmerman FINAL REPORT I 'I Biological Inventories of Schoodic and Corea Peninsulas, Coastal Maine, 1996 I . I 'I I - ! June 30, 1999 I By: William E. Glanz, Biological Sciences Department, University of Maine and Bruce Connery, Acadia National Park, Co- Principal Investigators, With Chapters Contributed by Norman Famous, Glen Mittelhauser, Melissa Perera, Marcia Spencer-Famous, and Guthrie Zimmerman UNIVERSITY OF MAINE Department of Biological Sciences o 5751 Murray Hall o 5722 Deering Hall Orono. ME 04469-5751 Orono, ME 04469-5722 207/581-2540 207/581-2970 II FA-,{ 207/581-2537 FAX 207/581-2969 I·J 12 July 1999 Dr. Allan O'Connell Cooperative Park Studies Unit II South Annex A I I University of Maine II Orono, ME 04469 Dear Allan: Enclosed are three copies of the Final Report on "Biological Inventories of Schoodic and Corea Peninsulas, Coastal Maine, 1996," for transmission to the National Park Service, New England I System Support Office.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Ceratodon Purpureus</I>
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses Winter 3-23-2018 Effect of Microbes on the Growth and Physiology of the Dioecious Moss, Ceratodon purpureus Caitlin Ann Maraist Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Biology Commons, and the Plant Sciences Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Maraist, Caitlin Ann, "Effect of Microbes on the Growth and Physiology of the Dioecious Moss, Ceratodon purpureus" (2018). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 4353. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.6246 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Effect of Microbes on the Growth and Physiology of the Dioecious Moss, Ceratodon purpureus by Caitlin Ann Maraist A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology Thesis Committee: Sarah M. Eppley, Chair Todd N. Rosenstiel Mitchell B. Cruzan Bitty A. Roy Portland State University 2018 © 2018 Caitlin Ann Maraist ABSTRACT The microorganisms colonizing plants can have a significant effect on host phenotype, mediating such processes as pathogen resistance, stress tolerance, nutrient acquisition, growth, and reproduction. Research regarding plant-microbe interactions has focused almost exclusively on vascular plants, and we know comparatively little about how bryophytes – including mosses, liverworts, and hornworts – are influenced by their microbiomes. Ceratodon purpureus is a dioecious, cosmopolitan moss species that exhibits sex-specific fungal communities, yet we do not know whether these microbes have a differential effect on the growth and physiology of male and female genotypes.
    [Show full text]
  • Mossy Bog Mat These Plants Are Frequently Found in This Community Type
    Characteristic Plants Mossy Bog Mat These plants are frequently found in this community type. Those with an asterisk are State Rank S4 often diagnostic of this community. in this peatland setting. Vascular plants Dwarf Shrub Community Description generally contribute <25% cover. Black crowberry The bryophyte layer is the most obvious Dwarf huckleberry component of this peatland type. A Similar Types Leatherleaf* dense and usually very wet layer of peat This is the only vegetation type in which Pale laurel mosses contributes most of the cover. bryophytes form the major continuous Small cranberry Low herbs and stunted shrubs are vegetation layer. Sedge - Leatherleaf Fen Herb often scattered across the moss lawn, Lawns, Low Sedge - Buckbean Fen Lawns, Mossy Bog Mat Horned bladderwort but usually form <25% cover overall. and Leatherleaf Boggy Fens can all have Pitcher plant Characteristic vascular plant species similar vascular plant species, but will on public lands and private conservation Round-leaved sundew Bog Moss Lawn include leatherleaf, bog rosemary (very have the vascular plants more strongly lands. Impoundment or draining would Tawny cotton-grass dwarfed), horned bladderwort, small dominant (typically >50% cover). have negative impacts on bog hydrology White beak-rush cranberry, and white beak-rush. The and consequently on the vegetation. Bryoid most typical bryophytes are Sphagnum Conservation, Wildlife, and Slow vegetation growth rates, due to the Bog-mat liverwort cuspidatum and bog-mat liverwort. Management Considerations nutrient-poor environment, result in slow Mylia liverwort This community type is well represented recovery from physical disturbances, such Sphagnum mosses* Soil and Site Characteristics in Maine and has been subject to few as recreational trail use.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine River Wetland Complex Beginning with Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance Habitat Maine River Wetland Complex
    Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance: Maine River Wetland Complex Beginning with Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance Habitat Maine River Wetland Complex WHY IS THIS AREA SIGNIFICANT? This focus area includes an enormous wetland complex encompassing several natural community types that extend in a broad mosaic along the Maine River forming a 4,200 acre peatland network, one of the largest wetland complexes in the region. OPPORTUNITIES FOR CONSERVATION » Educate recreational users about the eco- logical and economic benefits provided by the focus area. » Encourage best management practices for forestry, vegetation clearing, and soil disturbance activities near significant features to maintain ecological functions and values, habitat connectivity for wild- life, hydrologic processes, and watershed protection. » Maintain intact forested buffers along water bodies and wetlands to protect water quality and provide valuable riparian habitat for wildlife. » Monitor and remove invasive plant popu- lations. » Work with landowners to encourage sus- tainable forest management practices on remaining privately owned forest lands in and around the focus area. For more conservation opportunities, visit the Beginning with Habitat Online Toolbox: www.beginningwithhabitat.org/toolbox/ Biophysical Region about_toolbox.html. • Maine Eastern Interior • Maine-New Brunswick Lowlands Rare Animals Public Access Opportunities Black Tern » Sunrise Tree Farm Public Ac- Brook Floater cess Easement, New England Atlantic Salmon Forestry Foundation/State
    [Show full text]
  • Here They Were Hatched and Raised
    Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program informationinformation forfor thethe conservationconservation ofof biodiversitybiodiversity WILD HERITAGE NEWS Fall 2017 Piping Plovers Return to Pennsylvania! Inside This Issue by Ephraim Zimmerman Piping Plovers Return 1 to Pennsylvania! Observation of a male piping plover and included Presque Isle State Park, Peat Mosses: A Primer 6 (Charadrius melodus) strutting around the Pennsylvania Audubon, U.S. Fish and on Pennsylvania’s Sphagnum Diversity Gull Point Natural Area in 2005 triggered Wildlife Service, and PNHP science staff a multiagency effort to improve the habitat from the Western Pennsylvania Notes from the Field 10 for the birds on the tiny spit of sand and Conservancy. We gladly put our cobble that juts into Lake Erie. The bird’s vegetation control work on hold so we did Eared False-Foxglove 10 Keeps Outfoxing the territorial behavior indicated that the not disrupt the plover’s nesting efforts and Odds species was looking to return to this watched as they performed their courtship historical nesting area, last occupied in the displays, defended their territories, Discovery of Running 10 Buffalo Clover early 1950s. PNHP has long been a part of scratched their nests in the sand, and biological inventory work on Presque Isle incubated their eggs. It was not smooth Ohio River Mussels 11 and an integral part of the team involved in sailing for the birds though. Notoriously Flight 93 12 efforts to make Gull Point more habitable sensitive, these tiny shorebirds were under for the plovers and other shorebirds. constant threat from predators like A New, Yet Old, Cactus 12 Over the last twelve years, PNHP has raccoons, coyotes, peregrine falcons, and Species for Pennsylvania contributed by assessing and mapping gulls.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamatocaulis Vernicosus (Mitt.) Hedenäs
    Hamatocaulis vernicosus (Mitt.) Hedenäs (Slender Green feather-moss) in the Republic of Ireland Article 17 Report Backing Document 2013 Christina Campbell, Nick Hodgetts & Neil Lockhart © National Parks and Wildlife Service 1 Hamatocaulis vernicosus (Mitt.) Hedenäs (Slender Green feather-moss) in the Republic of Ireland Synonyms Amblystegium vernicosum (Lindb.) Lindb. Drepanocladus vernicosus (Mitt.) Warnst. Drepanocladus vernicosus var. gracile G. Roth Harpidium vernicosum (Mitt.) C.E.O. Jensen Hypnum aduncum var. vernicosum (Mitt.) Molendo Hypnum lycopodioides var. genuinum Sanio Hypnum lycopodioides var. vernicosum (Mitt.) Sanio Hypnum pellucidum Wilson ex. Jur. Hypnum vernicosum Lindb. Hypnum vernicosum var. fluitans Warnst. Limprichtia pellucida Wheld. Limprichtia vernicosa Loeske Scorpidium vernicosum (Mitt.) Tuom. Stereodon vernicosus Mitt. (Source: The Plant List: http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/tro-35184127) 1. Introduction and status Hamatocaulis vernicosus (Slender Green feather-moss) is a pleurocarpous moss of mesotrophic fens. It is a medium-sized perennial moss with pinnately branched shoots with branches that are held circa 90° to the stem (Atherton et al., 2010) that forms green to yellowish green patches. It has distinctive hooked shoot tips and the etymology of the genus name reflects this, as hamatus means ‘hook-like’ and caulis means ‘stem’ (Hedenäs, 1989a). The leaves are strongly falcate-secund, are often longitudinally plicate and frequently tinged with red at the bases (Smith, 2004). The function of the red pigmentation is thought to be protection against damaging levels of solar radiation (Hedenäs, 2003). There are two species in the genus, the other species being H. lapponicus, a Boreal species that does not occur in Ireland and differs from H.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Community Systems of New Hampshire: Terrestrial
    Natural Community Systems of New Hampshire Daniel D. Sperduto New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau DRED – Division of Forests & Lands PO Box 1856 – 172 Pembroke Road, Concord, NH 03302-1856 (603) 271-2214 The New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau is located within the NH Department of Resources and Economic Development’s Division of Forests and Lands. Primarily an information resource, the bureau finds, tracks, and facilitates the protection of New Hampshire's rare plants and exemplary natural communities. It is not a regulatory agency; instead, the bureau works with landowners and land managers to help them protect New Hampshire's natural heritage and meet their land-use needs. Its mission, as mandated by the Native Plant Protection Act of 1987 (NH RSA 217-A), is to determine protective measures and requirements for the survival of native plant species in the state, to investigate the condition and rarity of plant species, and to distribute information regarding the condition and protection of these species and their habitats. The New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau is an excellent source of information on plants and natural communities in New Hampshire, including their ecology and distribution in the state. It maintains the state’s only comprehensive database of New Hampshire’s exemplary natural communities, rare plants, and rare animals, including their known locations. Rare wildlife locations are maintained in cooperation with the Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program at the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department, which has legal authority over all wildlife in the state. The bureau is also a member of the NatureServe network, which connects nearly 80 Natural Heritage Programs throughout the United States, Canada, and several Latin and South American countries.
    [Show full text]
  • A Field Guide for Site Identification and Interpretation for the Vancouver Forest Region
    A Field Guide for Site Identification and Interpretation for the Vancouver Forest Region Land Management Handbook NUMBER 28 ISSN 0229-1622 1994 Province of British Columbia Ministry of Forests A Field Guide to Site Identification and Interpretation for the Vancouver Forest Region R.N. Green and K. Klinka Ministry of Forests Research Program 1994 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Green, R. N., 1953- A field guide to site identification and interpretation for the Vancouver Forest Region This guide replaces: Site diagnosis, tree species selection, and slashburning guidelines for the Vancouver Forest Region / R.N. Green ...[et al.] 1984. Cf. Introd. Field handbook format. Includes bibliographical references: p. ISBN 0-7726-21.29-2 1. Bioclimatology - British Columbia - Vancouver Region. 2. Biogeography - British Columbia - Vancouver Region. 3. Forest ecology - British Columbia - Vancouver Region. 4. Forest management - British Columbia - Vancouver Region. 5. Vancouver Forest Region (B.C.) I. Klinka, K., 1937- . II. Green, R. N., 1953- . Site diagnosis, tree species selection, and slash burning guidelines for the Vancouver Forest Region. III. British Columbia. Ministry of Forests. IV. Title. QH541.5.F6G73 1994 581.5'2642'0971 1 C94-960173-X Authors and Affiliations:! Prepared by R. Green British Columbia Ministry of Forests 4595 Canada Way Burnaby, B.C., V5G 4L9 and K. Klinka University of British Columbia Forests Sciences Department 2357 Main Mall Vancouver, B.C. V6T 2A2 © 1994 Province of British Columbia Published by the Research Branch Ministry of Forests 31 Bastion Square Victoria, B.C., V8W 3E7 Copies of this and other Ministry of Forests titles are available from Crown Publications Inc., 546 Yates Street, Victoria, B.C.
    [Show full text]