DOCSLIB.ORG

A Study of the Application of Free and Open Source Software Licensing Ideas to Art and Cultural Production

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Sandbox Culture A Study of the Application of Free and Open Source Software Licensing Ideas to Art and Cultural Production Aymeric Mansoux Supervisor: Matthew Fuller Thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Cultural Studies, Goldsmiths, University of London, February 2017 I, Aymeric Mansoux, confirm that the work presented in this thesis ismy own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Date: February 19, 2017 Signed: Abstract In partial response to the inability of intellectual property laws to adapt to data-sharing over computer networks, several initiatives have proposed techno-legal alternatives to encourage the free circulation and transfor- mation of digital works. These alternatives have shaped part of contem- porary digital culture for more than three decades and are today often associated with the “free culture” movement. The different strands of this movement are essentially derived from a narrower concept of soft- ware freedom developed in the nineteen-eighties, and which is enforced within free and open source software communities. This principle was the first significant effort to articulate a reusable techno-legal template to work around the limitations of intellectual property laws. It also of- fered a vision of network culture where community participation and sharing was structural. From alternate tools and workflow systems, artist-run servers, net- work publishing experiments, open data and design lobbies, cooperative and collaborative frameworks, but also novel copyright licensing used by both non-profit organisations and for-profit corporations, the impact on cultural production of practices developed in relation to the ideas of iii free and open source software has been both influential and broadly ap- plied. However, if it is true that free and open source software has indeed succeeded in becoming a theoretical and practical model for the trans- formation of art and culture, the question remains at which ways it has provided such a model, how it has been effectively appropriated across different groups and contexts and in what ways these overlap ordiffer. Using the image of the sandbox, where code becomes a constituent device for different communities to experience varying ideologies and practices, this dissertation aims to map the consequent levels of diver- gence in interpreting and appropriating the free and open source techno- legal template. This thesis identifies the paradoxes, conflicts, and contra- dictions within free culture discourse. It explores the tensions between the wish to provide a theoretical universal definition of cultural freedom, and the disorderly reality of its practice and interpretation. However, despite the different layers of cultural diffusion, appropriation, misun- derstanding and miscommunication that together form the fabric of free culture, this dissertation argues that, even though feared, fought, and crit- icised, these issues are not signs of dysfunctionality but are instead the evidence of cultural diversity within free culture. This dissertation will also demonstrate that conflicts between and within these sandboxes cre- ate a democratic process that permits the constant transformation of the free and open source discourse, and is therefore something that should be embraced and neither resisted nor substituted for a universal approach to cultural production. iv Table of Contents Abstract iii List of Illustrations ix Acknowledgements xi Introduction xiii What Is Free Culture? . xiii Research Question ........................... xxi Methodology ..............................xxii Limit of the Research . .xxviii Structure of the Argument ......................xxx Prologue xxxiii Part 1: Free as in… Culture 1 1 Paradigm Maintenance and User Freedom 6 1.1 Questioning the Revolution ................... 6 1.2 Source Code and the Individuation of the Programmer . 11 1.3 Engineering Freedom and User Groups . 19 1.4 UNIX Connects the Dots, People and Pipelines . 26 1.5 The Growing Unix Fellowship . 33 1.6 Controlling Software Development . 38 1.7 Fratricide Software ........................ 45 1.8 The Need to Define ........................ 49 1.9 Software Licenses ......................... 59 1.10 From Machine Instructions to Community Rules . 63 Interlude 73 2 In Search of Pluralism 76 2.1 Diffusion and Appropriation . 76 2.2 Prototyping Free Culture .................... 83 2.3 Defining Free Culture and the Decay of Pluralism . 91 2.4 The Political Denial of Open Everything . 96 2.5 The Liberal Democratic Industries of Freedom and Openness 103 Part 2: Free as in… Art 113 3 Art Libre 120 3.1 Free Art Incentives . 120 3.2 Licence Art Libre . 130 3.3 Usefulness of Legal Constraints as Safe Haven . 137 3.4 Artistic Freedom versus Software Freedom . 148 Interlude 154 4 The Practice of Free-Range Free Culture 161 4.1 Mattin - Production . 161 4.2 Nina Paley - Product . 167 4.3 Stéphanie Villayphiou and Alexandre Leray - Process . 175 4.4 A Note on the Artistic Appropriation of the Free Cultural Discourse ..............................185 4.4.1 Save the GNou! . 186 4.4.2 Fibre Libre . 191 4.4.3 CC Ironies . 195 Interlude 201 5 Free Cultural Misunderstandings 205 5.1 The Double Misunderstanding with Copyleft . 205 5.2 The Enduring Debate over the Commercial Exploitation of Free Culture ............................221 Part 3: Free as in … Trapped 235 6 The (Almost) Endless Possibilities of the Free Culture Template247 6.1 Free Software Art Publishing . 247 6.2 The Source of Free Cultural Expressions . 259 6.3 Sharing Is Caring but How Many Files Are Enough? . 270 Interlude 280 7 From Techno-Legal Templates to Sandbox Culture 285 7.1 Deceptive Participations in a RO/RW Remix Culture . 285 7.2 The Early Days of Mixes Between Operating Systems and Social Systems . 297 7.3 Policies, Jails, Chroot and Sandboxes . 304 Interlude 311 8 The Mechanics of Sandbox Culture 316 8.1 A Day in the Sandbox Life . 316 8.1.1 RjDj .............................318 8.1.2 Fuck the System . 328 8.2 Fork the System . 339 8.3 On Forking Homes, Sandboxes and Software Exile . 354 Conclusion 368 Summary of the Argument . 369 A Model for the Transformation of Art and Cultural Production? 374 Remark on Sandbox Culture and Future Research . 379 Appendix: Selection of Proto-Free Culture Licenses 382 References 453 List of Illustrations 1.1 UNIX license plate ........................ 32 3.1 Reuse and appropriation between FAL/LAL artists . 136 4.1 Mattin at make art festival . 165 4.2 Sita Sings the Blues . 169 4.3 Snapshots from OSP design process and tools . 181 4.4 Dépôt marque Française COPYLEFT . 188 4.5 Fibre Libre .............................193 4.6 CC Ironies (sample from a series of 42) . 197 5.1 RIP!: A Remix Manifesto . 210 5.2 Copyleft (L) sticker . 215 5.3 Cover of 1985 copy-left issue #3 . 217 6.1 self3[cpu] .............................256 6.2 A maybe free and highly compressed thumbnail . 261 6.3 How deep is your source? . 264 7.1 Community Memory walkthrough . 299 8.1 RjDj promotion . 321 ix In memory of Christine Mansoux Acknowledgements Des bisoux, Des bisoux, Des bisoux, Des bisoux, Des bisoux, Des bisoux, Des bisoux, Des bisoux, Des bisoux, Des bisoux, Des bisoux, Des bisoux, Des bisoux, Des bisoux, Des bisoux. — Philippe Katerine, Des Bisoux Dušan Barok, Maja Bekan, Casper Bentinck, Paul Brossier, André Castro, Ana Isabel Carvalho, Ruth Catlow, Jeroen Chabot, Ben Chang, Constant, Florian Cramer, Yves Degoyon, Annet Dekker, Kevin Driscoll, Quinn DuPont, Julien Deswaef, Eightycolumn, Bridget Elmer, Andy Farnell, Laura Fernández, Matthew Fuller, Marcos García, Marc Garrett, Anne Goldenberg, Olga Goriunova, Eleanor Greenhalgh, Dave Griffiths, Christoph Haag, Jean-Philippe Halgand, Graham Harwood, Sachiko Hayashi, Claude Heiland-Allen, Benjamin Mako Hill, Don Hopkins, Kennisland, Danny van der Kleij, Eric Kluitenberg, Kunsthuis SYB, Anne Laforet, Ricardo Lafuente, Chun Lee, Alexandre Leray, Libre Graphics Research Unit, Geert Lovink, Alessandro Ludovico, Nicolas Malevé, Alexia Mansoux, Bernard Mansoux, Christine Mansoux, Mattin, Chris McCormick, Bonnie Mitchell, Modern Poland Foundation, Antoine Moreau, Michael Murtaugh, Rob Myers, Sally Jane Norman, Eleonora Oreggia, Nina Paley, Simon Pummel, Uschi Reiter, Raquel Rennó, Leslie Robbins, Jaron Rowan, Steve Rushton, Eric Schrijver, servus.at, Femke Snelting, Manfred Vänçi Stirnemann, Michael Stuz, Bruno Tarin, Renee Turner, Marloes de Valk, Florian de Valk-Mansoux, Noam de Valk-Mansoux, Mirko Vidovic, Stéphanie Villayphiou, Dave Young, Simon Yuill. Thank you all so much! xi This research received financial support from Willem de Kooning Academy and Research Centre Creating 010 of the Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences. The thesis was written using the following software and operating sys- tems: acme, Debian, evilwm, Firefox, FreeBSD, git, hunspell, jabref, meld, pandoc, recoll, WordNet, XƎLATEX, zathura, zsh. xii Introduction What Is Free Culture? According to the website freeculture.org, developed by a “non-partisan group of students and young people who are working to get their peers involved in the free culture movement,”1 the term free culture was origi- nally coined by American law professor Lawrence Lessig in his 2004 book Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity.2 Lessig’s book is an elaborate collection of anecdotes, that together form a critique of the increasing discrepancy between,
Recommended publications
  • Usask Open Textbook Authoring Guide – Ver.1.0

    Usask Open Textbook Authoring Guide – Ver.1.0

    USask Open Textbook Authoring Guide – Ver.1.0 USask Open Textbook Authoring Guide – Ver.1.0 A Guide to Authoring & Adapting Open Textbooks at the University of Saskatchewan Distance Education Unit (DEU), University of Saskatchewan Jordan Epp, M.Ed., Kristine Dreaver-Charles, M.Sc.Ed., Jeanette McKee, M.Ed. Open Press DEU, Usask Saskatoon Copyright:2016 by Distance Education Unit, University of Saskatchewan. This book is an adaptation based on the B.C. Open Textbook Authoring Guide created by BCcampus and licensed with a CC-BY 4.0 license. Changes to the BCcampus Authoring Guide for this University of Saskatchewan adaptation included: Changing the references from BCcampus Open Project to be more relevant to the University of Saskatchewan’s open textbook development. Creation of a new title page and book title. Changing information about Support Services to be University of Saskatchewan specific. Performing a general text edit throughout the guide, added image captions, and updated most images to remove the BCcampus branding. Updating Pressbook platform nomenclature to be consistent with the current version of Pressbooks. Unless otherwise noted, this book is released under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 Unported license. Under the terms of the CC-BY license you can freely share, copy or redistribute the material in any medium or format, or adapt the material by remixing, transforming or modifying this material providing you attribute the Distance Education Unit, University of Saskatchewan and BCcampus. Attribution means you must give appropriate credit to the Distance Education Unit, University of Saskatchewan and BCcampus as the original creator, note the CC-BY license this document has been released under, and indicate if you have made any changes to the content.
  • Librologie 8 : Les Petits Cœurs De Tatie Nina

    Librologie 8 : Les Petits Cœurs De Tatie Nina

    Librologie 8 : Les petits cœurs de tatie Nina Bonjour à vous, courageux public du Framablog ! Avec l’épisode d’aujourd’hui et le prochain, qui concluera cette première partie de saison Librologique, je vous propose d’ébaucher le portrait de deux personnalités importantes du monde Libre, parfois complémentaires, parfois opposées. Contrairement à Linus Torvalds ou Richard Stallman avec qui nous avions ouvert ces chroniques, il ne s’agit pas là de programmeurs ni de techniciens, mais d’auteurs : de ces auteurs qui réfléchissent sur leur propre droit — puisque le droit d’auteur, c’est bien conçu pour… les auteurs, non ? (Comment ça, « rien compris » ?) V. Villenave. Librologie 8 : Les petits cœurs de tatie Nina « En 1988, à l’âge tendre de 20 ans, je quittai ma ville natale de Urbana, Illinois, pour Santa Cruz en Californie, afin d’y poursuivre le rêve naïf de devenir hippie, new-age et ésotérique. Au lieu de quoi je suis devenue illustratrice et cynique. » C’est ainsi que Nina Paley raconte son histoire, de la banlieue de Chicago (Urbana, dont son père a été un maire courageux) à la Californie — le choix de Santa Cruz n’est pas innocent : indissociable des bouleversements sociaux des années 1960-1970, cette ville correspond bien à l’arrière-plan idéologique de la « Nouvelle Gauche » de cette époque, effectivement liée au mouvement hippie, mais également à l’avènement d’une conception nouvelle des sciences humaines (sociologie, psychiatrie alternative,…). Avec toutefois une tournure moins optimiste dans le cas de Paley : par exemple, elle revendique son choix de ne pas faire d’enfants comme un choix militant ; membre revendiquée duMouvement pour l’Extinction Volontaire de l’Espèce Humaine, sa principale préoccupation politique (tout au moins dans la période 1995-2005) semble être la surpopulation humaine.
  • Openness in the Music Business– How Record Labels and Artists May Profit from Reducing Control

    Openness in the Music Business– How Record Labels and Artists May Profit from Reducing Control

    Table of Contents TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN Dr. Theo Schöller-Stiftungslehrstuhl für Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement Openness in the music business– How record labels and artists may profit from reducing control Johannes L. Wechsler Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Wirtschaftswissenschaften (Dr. rer. pol.) genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Univ.-Prof. Dr. I. Welpe Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Univ.-Prof. Dr. J. Henkel 2. Univ.-Prof. Dr. F. v. Wangenheim Die Dissertation wurde am 09.12.2010 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften am 11.05.2011 angenommen. i Table of Contents Table of Contents DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................... II LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................. V LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. VII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS..................................................................................................................IX ABSTRACT..............................................................................................................................................XI 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................
  • Tuto Documentation Release 0.1.0

    Tuto Documentation Release 0.1.0

    Tuto Documentation Release 0.1.0 DevOps people 2020-05-09 09H16 CONTENTS 1 Documentation news 3 1.1 Documentation news 2020........................................3 1.1.1 New features of sphinx.ext.autodoc (typing) in sphinx 2.4.0 (2020-02-09)..........3 1.1.2 Hypermodern Python Chapter 5: Documentation (2020-01-29) by https://twitter.com/cjolowicz/..................................3 1.2 Documentation news 2018........................................4 1.2.1 Pratical sphinx (2018-05-12, pycon2018)...........................4 1.2.2 Markdown Descriptions on PyPI (2018-03-16)........................4 1.2.3 Bringing interactive examples to MDN.............................5 1.3 Documentation news 2017........................................5 1.3.1 Autodoc-style extraction into Sphinx for your JS project...................5 1.4 Documentation news 2016........................................5 1.4.1 La documentation linux utilise sphinx.............................5 2 Documentation Advices 7 2.1 You are what you document (Monday, May 5, 2014)..........................8 2.2 Rédaction technique...........................................8 2.2.1 Libérez vos informations de leurs silos.............................8 2.2.2 Intégrer la documentation aux processus de développement..................8 2.3 13 Things People Hate about Your Open Source Docs.........................9 2.4 Beautiful docs.............................................. 10 2.5 Designing Great API Docs (11 Jan 2012)................................ 10 2.6 Docness.................................................
  • Fog Computing: a Platform for Internet of Things and Analytics

    Fog Computing: a Platform for Internet of Things and Analytics

    Fog Computing: A Platform for Internet of Things and Analytics Flavio Bonomi, Rodolfo Milito, Preethi Natarajan and Jiang Zhu Abstract Internet of Things (IoT) brings more than an explosive proliferation of endpoints. It is disruptive in several ways. In this chapter we examine those disrup- tions, and propose a hierarchical distributed architecture that extends from the edge of the network to the core nicknamed Fog Computing. In particular, we pay attention to a new dimension that IoT adds to Big Data and Analytics: a massively distributed number of sources at the edge. 1 Introduction The “pay-as-you-go” Cloud Computing model is an efficient alternative to owning and managing private data centers (DCs) for customers facing Web applications and batch processing. Several factors contribute to the economy of scale of mega DCs: higher predictability of massive aggregation, which allows higher utilization with- out degrading performance; convenient location that takes advantage of inexpensive power; and lower OPEX achieved through the deployment of homogeneous compute, storage, and networking components. Cloud computing frees the enterprise and the end user from the specification of many details. This bliss becomes a problem for latency-sensitive applications, which require nodes in the vicinity to meet their delay requirements. An emerging wave of Internet deployments, most notably the Internet of Things (IoTs), requires mobility support and geo-distribution in addition to location awareness and low latency. We argue that a new platform is needed to meet these requirements; a platform we call Fog Computing [1]. We also claim that rather than cannibalizing Cloud Computing, F. Bonomi R.
  • Openfog Reference Architecture for Fog Computing

    Openfog Reference Architecture for Fog Computing

    OpenFog Reference Architecture for Fog Computing Produced by the OpenFog Consortium Architecture Working Group www.OpenFogConsortium.org February 2017 1 OPFRA001.020817 © OpenFog Consortium. All rights reserved. Use of this Document Copyright © 2017 OpenFog Consortium. All rights reserved. Published in the USA. Published February 2017. This is an OpenFog Consortium document and is to be used in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth below. The information contained in this document is subject to change without notice. The information in this publication was developed under the OpenFog Consortium Intellectual Property Rights policy and is provided as is. OpenFog Consortium makes no representations or warranties of any kind with respect to the information in this publication, and specifically disclaims implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose. This document contains content that is protected by copyright. Copying or distributing the content from this document without permission is prohibited. OpenFog Consortium and the OpenFog Consortium logo are registered trademarks of OpenFog Consortium in the United States and other countries. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Acknowledgements The OpenFog Reference Architecture is the product of the OpenFog Architecture Workgroup, co-chaired by Charles Byers (Cisco) and Robert Swanson (Intel). It represents the collaborative work of the global membership of the OpenFog Consortium. We wish to thank these organizations for contributing
  • Librologie 8 : Les Petits Cœurs De Tatie Nina

    Librologie 8 : Les Petits Cœurs De Tatie Nina

    Librologie 8 : Les petits cœurs de tatie Nina Bonjour à vous, courageux public du Framablog ! Avec l’épisode d’aujourd’hui et le prochain, qui concluera cette première partie de saison Librologique, je vous propose d’ébaucher le portrait de deux personnalités importantes du monde Libre, parfois complémentaires, parfois opposées. Contrairement à Linus Torvalds ou Richard Stallman avec qui nous avions ouvert ces chroniques, il ne s’agit pas là de programmeurs ni de techniciens, mais d’auteurs : de ces auteurs qui réfléchissent sur leur propre droit — puisque le droit d’auteur, c’est bien conçu pour… les auteurs, non ? (Comment ça, « rien compris » ?) V. Villenave. Librologie 8 : Les petits cœurs de tatie Nina « En 1988, à l’âge tendre de 20 ans, je quittai ma ville natale de Urbana, Illinois, pour Santa Cruz en Californie, afin d’y poursuivre le rêve naïf de devenir hippie, new-age et ésotérique. Au lieu de quoi je suis devenue illustratrice et cynique. » C’est ainsi que Nina Paley raconte son histoire, de la banlieue de Chicago (Urbana, dont son père a été un maire courageux) à la Californie — le choix de Santa Cruz n’est pas innocent : indissociable des bouleversements sociaux des années 1960-1970, cette ville correspond bien à l’arrière-plan idéologique de la « Nouvelle Gauche » de cette époque, effectivement liée au mouvement hippie, mais également à l’avènement d’une conception nouvelle des sciences humaines (sociologie, psychiatrie alternative,…). Avec toutefois une tournure moins optimiste dans le cas de Paley : par exemple, elle revendique son choix de ne pas faire d’enfants comme un choix militant ; membre revendiquée duMouvement pour l’Extinction Volontaire de l’Espèce Humaine, sa principale préoccupation politique (tout au moins dans la période 1995-2005) semble être la surpopulation humaine.
  • Report to the President: MIT and the Prosecution of Aaron Swartz

    Report to the President: MIT and the Prosecution of Aaron Swartz

    Report to the President MIT and the Prosecution of Aaron Swartz Review Panel Harold Abelson Peter A. Diamond Andrew Grosso Douglas W. Pfeiffer (support) July 26, 2013 © Copyright 2013, Massachusetts Institute of Technology This worK is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. PRESIDENT REIF’S CHARGE TO HAL ABELSON | iii L. Rafael Reif, President 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Building 3-208 Cambridge, MA 02139-4307 U.S.A. Phone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
  • HHS Lesson 8: Forensics

    HHS Lesson 8: Forensics

    LESSON 8 DIGITAL FORENSICS AND COUNTER FORENSICS Lesson 8: Forensics WARNING The Hacker Highschool Project is a learning tool and as with any learning tool there are dangers. Some lessons, if abused, may result in physical injury. Some additional dangers may also exist where there is not enough research on possible effects of emanations from particular technologies. Students using these lessons should be supervised yet encouraged to learn, try, and do. However ISECOM cannot accept responsibility for how any information herein is abused. The following lessons and workbooks are open and publicly available under the following terms and conditions of ISECOM: All works in the Hacker Highschool Project are provided for non-commercial use with elementary school students, junior high school students, and high school students whether in a public institution, private institution, or a part of home-schooling. These materials may not be reproduced for sale in any form. The provision of any class, course, training, or camp with these materials for which a fee is charged is expressly forbidden without a license, including college classes, university classes, trade-school classes, summer or computer camps, and similar. To purchase a license, visit the LICENSE section of the HHS web page at http://www.hackerhighschool.org/licensing.html. The Hacker Highschool Project is an open community effort and if you find value in this project, we ask that you support us through the purchase of a license, a donation, or sponsorship. 2 Lesson 8: Forensics Table of
  • Hackerspaces

    Hackerspaces

    d WP4 | CASE STUDY Report: Hackerspaces Theme [ssh.2013.3.2-1][Social Innovation- Empowering People, changing societies] Project Full Title: “Transformative Social Innovation Theory project” Grant Agreement n. 613169 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 613169 Suggested citation: Sabine Hielscher, Adrian Smith, Mariano Fressoli (2015) WP4 Case Study Report: Hackerspaces, Report For the TRANSIT FP7 Project, SPRU, University oF Sussex, Brighton. Acknowledgements: We wish to thank everyone in the Hackerspace scene who helped us with our research, whether through interviews, welcoming us to Hackerspaces and events, or putting us in touch with others. We also thank our colleagues in the TRANSIT project, at SPRU, at UNQ and Fundación Cenit For their help and encouragement with the research. Finally, we thank the European Commission and their FP7 research programme For Funding the TRANSIT project. Date: 14 January 2015 Authors: Sabine Hielscher, Adrian Smith, Mariano Fressoli Contact person: Adrian Smith Table of contents 1 Introduction to Hackerspaces 2 Methodology 2.1 Researcher relations to the case 2.2 Methods 3 Analysis of transnational network(ing) 3.1 Transnational networking: Hackerspaces 3.2 Aspects of ‘innovation’ and ‘change’ of the transnational network(ing) 3.3 Aspects of empowerment and disempowerment of the transnational network(ing) 3.4 Other issues about the transnational networking 4 Local initiative
  • The Song Remains … the Same? Three Case Studies of Issues of Digital Preservation in Second Life Performance Practices

    The Song Remains … the Same? Three Case Studies of Issues of Digital Preservation in Second Life Performance Practices

    The Song Remains … The Same? Three Case Studies of Issues of Digital Preservation in Second Life Performance Practices Dennis Moser I. Conceptual Differences Across Disciplines: Needs & Approaches The practice of documentation of performances such as music, theater, and dance and performance art is an integral part of the cultural record. As such, it is subject to change and evolution over time, as well as the vagaries of natural catastrophe, social disorder, or any of the myriad disrupters of human history. The application of the practice of documentation varies according to the discipline utilizing it; indeed, even its efficacy varies from culture to culture and from discipline to discipline. Couple this with our movement deeper and deeper into the use of digital technology for the manifestation of culture and we must grapple with new solutions for capturing and conveying the essentials of these acts of expression. The emergence of performance and installation art in the 20th century gave rise to a field of critical theory somewhat at odds with other approaches of documentation, couched as it was in the visual arts. While aspects of theater and dance have influenced this critical theory, the performance practice considerations of music have not played as much a role in defining it. Indeed, considerable discussion has been generated, over understanding just what comprises “documentation”, whether photography is ‘documentary’ or ‘theatrical’, or if it is a ‘conceptual medium for documentation’ (Taylor, 2009). This reflects a concern for the “visual” aspect of “performance” art as opposed to the temporal aspects so inherent in both music and dance.
  • Kali Linux Penetration Testing Bible

    Kali Linux Penetration Testing Bible

    Telegram Channel : @IRFaraExam Table of Contents Cover Title Page Introduction What Does This Book Cover? Companion Download Files How to Contact the Publisher How to Contact the Author CHAPTER 1: Mastering the Terminal Window Kali Linux File System Managing Users and Groups in Kali Files and Folders Management in Kali Linux Remote Connections in Kali Kali Linux System Management Networking in Kali Linux Summary CHAPTER 2: Bash Scripting Basic Bash Scripting Printing to the Screen in Bash Variables Script Parameters User Input Functions Conditions and Loops Summary CHAPTER 3: Network Hosts Scanning Basics of Networking Network Scanning DNS Enumeration Telegram Channel : @IRFaraExam Summary CHAPTER 4: Internet Information Gathering Passive Footprinting and Reconnaissance Summary CHAPTER 5: Social Engineering Attacks Spear Phishing Attacks Payloads and Listeners Social Engineering with the USB Rubber Ducky Summary CHAPTER 6: Advanced Enumeration Phase Transfer Protocols E‐mail Protocols Database Protocols CI/CD Protocols Web Protocols 80/443 Graphical Remoting Protocols File Sharing Protocols Summary CHAPTER 7: Exploitation Phase Vulnerabilities Assessment Services Exploitation Summary CHAPTER 8: Web Application Vulnerabilities Web Application Vulnerabilities Summary CHAPTER 9: Web Penetration Testing and Secure Software Development Lifecycle Web Enumeration and Exploitation Secure Software Development Lifecycle Summary CHAPTER 10: Linux Privilege Escalation Telegram Channel : @IRFaraExam Introduction to Kernel Exploits and Missing Configurations