DOCSLIB.ORG

The Sharon Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Sharon Statement Primary Sources Conservativism The Sharon Statement September 11, 1960 INTRODUCTION In the fall of 1960, some 90 young conservatives met This statement of principles denies the basic prem- at the Sharon, Connecticut, home of National Review ises of Progressivism and liberalism. It also recalls editor William F. Buckley, Jr., where they founded earlier New England declarations about fundamental Young Americans for Freedom (YAF) to serve as an liberties—for example, the Essex Resolves and Mas- organization for young conservative activists. As their sachusetts Constitution of 1780. While the language statement of principle, the group adopted the Sharon differs, the concerns for liberty remain the same over Statement, which was drafted by 26-year-old news- the centuries. paper editor M. Stanton Evans. Written “at this time of YAF became one of the most influential groups in moral and political crisis,” the statement is a succinct the history of modern conservatism. In the early 1960s, summary of the central ideas of modern American it would provide the National Draft Goldwater Com- conservatism. mittee with critical manpower to draft and promote Among those principles are the following: Free will conservative Senator Barry Goldwater in the 1964 pres- and moral authority come from God; political and eco- idential election. YAF would also challenge the liberal nomic liberty are essential for a free people and free agenda of groups like the National Student Associa- institutions; government must be strictly and constitu- tion and Students for a Democratic Society, support tionally limited; the market economy is the economic American servicemen in Vietnam, and call for a firm system most compatible with freedom; and Commu- stance against Communism around the world. nism must be defeated, not merely contained. FP_PS_ 34 Published by 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20002-4999 (202) 546-4400 • heritage.org The Heritage Foundation’s First Principles Series explores the fundamental ideas of conservatism and the American political tradition. For more information call 1-800-544-4843 or visit heritage.org/bookstore. Nothing written here is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Heritage Foundation or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before Congress. PRIMARY SOURCES Conservativism “The Sharon Statement” Adopted in conference at Sharon, Connecticut, September 11, 1960 In this time of moral and political crises, it is the That the market economy, allocating resources by responsibility of the youth of America to affirm cer- the free play of supply and demand, is the single eco- tain eternal truths. nomic system compatible with the requirements of We, as young conservatives, believe: personal freedom and constitutional government, and That foremost among the transcendent values is that it is at the same time the most productive supplier the individual’s use of his God-given free will, whence of human needs; derives his right to be free from the restrictions of arbi- That when government interferes with the work of trary force; the market economy, it tends to reduce the moral and That liberty is indivisible, and that political free- physical strength of the nation; that when it takes from dom cannot long exist without economic freedom; one man to bestow on another, it diminishes the incen- That the purpose of government is to protect those tive of the first, the integrity of the second, and the freedoms through the preservation of internal order, moral autonomy of both; the provision of national defense, and the administra- That we will be free only so long as the national tion of justice; sovereignty of the United States is secure; that history That when government ventures beyond these shows periods of freedom are rare, and can exist only rightful functions, it accumulates power, which tends when free citizens concertedly defend their rights to diminish order and liberty; against all enemies; That the Constitution of the United States is the best That the forces of international Communism are, at arrangement yet devised for empowering government present, the greatest single threat to these liberties; to fulfill its proper role, while restraining it from the That the United States should stress victory over, concentration and abuse of power; rather than coexistence with, this menace; and That the genius of the Constitution—the division of That American foreign policy must be judged by powers—is summed up in the clause that reserves prima- this criterion: does it serve the just interests of the cy to the several states, or to the people, in those spheres United States? not specifically delegated to the Federal government; 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conservative Movement
    Conservative Movement How did the conservative movement, routed in Barry Goldwater's catastrophic defeat to Lyndon Johnson in the 1964 presidential campaign, return to elect its champion Ronald Reagan just 16 years later? What at first looks like the political comeback of the century becomes, on closer examination, the product of a particular political moment that united an unstable coalition. In the liberal press, conservatives are often portrayed as a monolithic Right Wing. Close up, conservatives are as varied as their counterparts on the Left. Indeed, the circumstances of the late 1980s -- the demise of the Soviet Union, Reagan's legacy, the George H. W. Bush administration -- frayed the coalition of traditional conservatives, libertarian advocates of laissez-faire economics, and Cold War anti- communists first knitted together in the 1950s by William F. Buckley Jr. and the staff of the National Review. The Reagan coalition added to the conservative mix two rather incongruous groups: the religious right, primarily provincial white Protestant fundamentalists and evangelicals from the Sunbelt (defecting from the Democrats since the George Wallace's 1968 presidential campaign); and the neoconservatives, centered in New York and led predominantly by cosmopolitan, secular Jewish intellectuals. Goldwater's campaign in 1964 brought conservatives together for their first national electoral effort since Taft lost the Republican nomination to Eisenhower in 1952. Conservatives shared a distaste for Eisenhower's "modern Republicanism" that largely accepted the welfare state developed by Roosevelt's New Deal and Truman's Fair Deal. Undeterred by Goldwater's defeat, conservative activists regrouped and began developing institutions for the long haul.
    [Show full text]
  • Young Americans for Freedom Box: 28
    Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Blackwell, Morton: Files Folder Title: Young Americans for Freedom Box: 28 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ Georgetown Young Americans for Freedom P.O . Box 3033 Washington, D.C. 20057 (202) 944-1291 Richard J. Mathias Chairman Patrick Mahon Vice-Chairman Kevin Piediscalzi Treasurer Quin Hillyer ~\\~, Secretary Don McLaughlin Program Director . J w~ M -h ~ r ~ ~ Kevin Kime Membership Director ~ Q""'RA,-!/.M'j wi~4~N~- Bridget Brooker Public Relations Brad Seiling Ul v~ Public Relations .ftvl'Al ~ ::,~ ~4 J }- Deroy Murdock Executive Director ~ ~ r r--t-1-ic1~ .M cf)/V/~ - ~ ~ _k~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I w-laf-tvi,-1 C\.v\ w~}P ~,.de - ~ ~ ~ Iv~ wJ2JJ r•JJ..e. '14 ~ t,,11-,/ ~ ~uw/4 ~ w1d w/4J./-1 ~ al ~~ f~~. ~ ~ CnCQ~I~ ~ (;.e_t,.,~1 J-®'M.w.1~ c,W~c.J,__ PAGE 4A / WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 2 GOP told to follow FDR's example BY A WASHINGTON TIMES STAFF WRITER policy initiatives even when he knew A lack of grass-roots activism contri­ defensive," - they get to select the The Republicans could suffer "a some of them would fail, Blackwell said. buted strongly to the Democratic con­ terms of battle. , lonely landslide". next year unless they Eisenhower, on the other hand, quickly gressional resurgence in the 1982 "Every election," he said, "is a refer­ can find a way to put their conservative lost his opportunity while retaining his midterm congressional elections, endum on something," and ·conserva, coalition back together in time for the personal popularity, Blackwell said.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nativist Lobby Three Faces of Intolerance
    The Nativist Lobby Three Faces of Intolerance A Report from the Southern Poverty Law Center Montgomery, Alabama February 2009 The Nativist Lobby Three Faces of Intolerance By Heidi BeiricH • edited By Mark Potok the southern poverty law center is a nonprofit organization that combats hate, intolerance and discrimination through education and litigation. Its Intelligence Project, which prepared this report and also produces the quarterly investigative magazine Intelligence Report, tracks the activities of hate groups and the nativist movement and monitors militia and other extremist anti- government activity. Its Teaching Tolerance project helps foster respect and understanding in the classroom. Its litigation arm files lawsuits against hate groups for the violent acts of their members. MEDIA AND GENERAL INQUIRIES Mark Potok, Editor Heidi Beirich Southern Poverty Law Center 400 Washington Ave., Montgomery, Ala. (334) 956-8200 www.splcenter.org • www.intelligencereport.org • www.splcenter.org/blog This report was prepared by the staff of the Intelligence Project of the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Center is supported entirely by private donations. No government funds are involved. © Southern Poverty Law Center. All rights reserved. southern poverty law center Table of Contents Preface 4 The Puppeteer: John Tanton and the Nativist Movement 5 FAIR: The Lobby’s Action Arm 9 CIS: The Lobby’s ‘Independent’ Think Tank 13 NumbersUSA: The Lobby’s Grassroots Organizer 18 southern poverty law center Editor’s Note By Mark Potok Three Washington, D.C.-based immigration-restriction organizations stand at the nexus of the American nativist movement: the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), and NumbersUSA.
    [Show full text]
  • American Political Thought
    AMERICAN POLITICAL THOUGHT 00-Whittington-FM.indd 1 28/10/15 5:50 AM DESIGN SERVICES OF # 159102 Cust: OUP Au: Whittington Pg. No. i K S4CARLISLE Title: American Political Thought 1e Short / Normal Publishing Services 00-Whittington-FM.indd 2 28/10/15 5:50 AM DESIGN SERVICES OF # 159102 Cust: OUP Au: Whittington Pg. No. ii K S4CARLISLE Title: American Political Thought 1e Short / Normal Publishing Services AMERICAN POLITICAL THOUGHT READINGS AND MATERIALS Keith E. Whittington PRINCETON UNIVERSITY NEW YORK OXFORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 00-Whittington-FM.indd 3 28/10/15 5:50 AM DESIGN SERVICES OF # 159102 Cust: OUP Au: Whittington Pg. No. iii K S4CARLISLE Title: American Political Thought 1e Short / Normal Publishing Services Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2017 by Oxford University Press For titles covered by Section 112 of the US Higher Education Opportunity Act, please visit www.oup.com/us/he for the latest information about pricing and alternate formats. Published by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 http://www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilson Quarterly
    The Wilson Quar Terly A Manifesto at 50 The Port Huron Statement launched America’s New Left in 1962. Today it seems naive and in some ways misguided— yet it raised questions that still agitate Americans today. By DANIEL AKST “We are people of this generation, bred in not to mention Jane Fonda’s second husband—might at least modest comfort, housed now in universities, well be said to have launched the 1960s. looking uncomfortably to the world we inherit.” All these years later, everything about the Port Hu- So begins the audacious manifesto known as the ron Statement remains youthful, including the tender Port Huron Statement, the product of 60 idealistic mix of insight and naiveté throughout. But lo and be- young Americans who traveled in June 1962 to a re- hold, the 50th birthday of that fateful document is fast treat at the base of Lake Huron to hash out their beliefs approaching. Its leftist masterminds—or at least, those about social change. The conferees were serious sorts, who haven’t moved on to some great protest rally in the conventionally dressed middle-class overachievers sky—are on Social Security. Yet judging from the con- from good colleges, mostly, meeting at the height of tinuing timeliness and insight of what they produced, the optimism prevailing during the Kennedy years. they might as easily have met last week. But the young people gathered in Port Huron, The Port Huron kids were concerned about eco- Michigan, weren’t buying the era’s hopefulness; on the nomic inequality, which, measured by the distribution contrary, they were members of a two-year-old group of income, is greater today than it was then.
    [Show full text]
  • Part V Jfk- Media Image and Legacy
    PART V JFK- MEDIA IMAGE AND LEGACY 242 Chapter 20 Kennedy’s Loyal Opposition: National Review and the Development of a Conservative Alternative, January- August 1961 Laura Jane Gifford The March 25, 1961, National Review related the contents of a recent subscriber letter in a back-cover subscription appeal. This man, “usually understood to be a liberal” and well-placed in New York Democratic circles, wrote the magazine and explained: Of course I am not in agreement with most of your criticism of President Kennedy; nor do I believe you will get far in your obvious editorial support of Senator Barry Goldwater, but renew my subscription, for I can no longer get along without National Review. I find that National Review is a whiskey I must sample once a week. From every other journalist I get a sensation of either soda pop (and who does not finally gag on effervescent, treacly sugar water), or from the intellectual journals of my own persuasion I now get no more than strained vegetable juices unfermented. So I am now a tippler. Eight dollars enclosed. The advertisement’s writer went on to speculate that perhaps National Review’s rarified appeal stemmed from its very lack of broadmindedness; rather, “it is a magazine of fact and opinion, of discourse and criticism, on the central questions of our age,” questions identified as dealing with how to meet the Communist challenge, “resuscitate the spirit in an age of horror,” guard one’s mind against uniformity in the age of mass appeal, and resist collectivism, preserve freedom and teach love of country, respect for past wisdom and responsibility to the future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long New Right and the World It Made Daniel Schlozman Johns
    The Long New Right and the World It Made Daniel Schlozman Johns Hopkins University [email protected] Sam Rosenfeld Colgate University [email protected] Version of January 2019. Paper prepared for the American Political Science Association meetings. Boston, Massachusetts, August 31, 2018. We thank Dimitrios Halikias, Katy Li, and Noah Nardone for research assistance. Richard Richards, chairman of the Republican National Committee, sat, alone, at a table near the podium. It was a testy breakfast at the Capitol Hill Club on May 19, 1981. Avoiding Richards were a who’s who from the independent groups of the emergent New Right: Terry Dolan of the National Conservative Political Action Committee, Paul Weyrich of the Committee for the Survival of a Free Congress, the direct-mail impresario Richard Viguerie, Phyllis Schlafly of Eagle Forum and STOP ERA, Reed Larson of the National Right to Work Committee, Ed McAteer of Religious Roundtable, Tom Ellis of Jesse Helms’s Congressional Club, and the billionaire oilman and John Birch Society member Bunker Hunt. Richards, a conservative but tradition-minded political operative from Utah, had complained about the independent groups making mischieF where they were not wanted and usurping the traditional roles of the political party. They were, he told the New Rightists, like “loose cannonballs on the deck of a ship.” Nonsense, responded John Lofton, editor of the Viguerie-owned Conservative Digest. If he attacked those fighting hardest for Ronald Reagan and his tax cuts, it was Richards himself who was the loose cannonball.1 The episode itself soon blew over; no formal party leader would follow in Richards’s footsteps in taking independent groups to task.
    [Show full text]
  • National Review Commentary What Is
    National Review Commentary What Is Conservatism? By Lee Edwards The National Review Institute, led by the redoubtable Lindsay Craig, has been engaged in a praiseworthy project these past five years, sponsoring a “rigorous examination” of conservative principles for mid-career professionals who want a deeper understanding of conservatism. Leading the discussions over the course of eight dinner seminars are such knowledgeable conservatives as Victor Davis Hanson, Jonah Goldberg, Richard Brookhiser, Dan Mahoney, and Kathryn Lopez. I have been privileged to kick off the series in New York City, Washington, D.C., Dallas, San Francisco, and Philadelphia with a profile of the polymath founder of National Review—William F. Buckley Jr. In the Q and A that follows two questions are invariably asked by the participants who are lawyers, educators, government employees, physicians, entrepreneurs, even pastors. The first usually comes half-way through the discussion: “Is there anyone on the scene today who will be the next Bill Buckley?” I decline to be pinned down to one name but point to dynamic young speakers like Ben Shapiro and Matthew Continetti and insightful editors like Yuval Levin and Dan McCarthy. When pressed I will respond that Bill Buckley was sui generis and it is unlikely we will see his like again. But, I am quick to add, there are a goodly number of conservatives under 40 whose talents in sum are equal to the man who more than anyone else made the modern conservative movement. The second question usually comes toward the end of the dinner: “What is conservatism?” Most of the NRI Fellows live in a hostile liberal world in which they are challenged to justify their positions philosophically.
    [Show full text]
  • Expertise and Disbelief
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2015 Expertise and Disbelief: Post-1945 American Attitudes Toward the Authority of Knowledge Terry Wagner Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Wagner, Terry, "Expertise and Disbelief: Post-1945 American Attitudes Toward the Authority of Knowledge" (2015). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1976. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1976 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. EXPERTISE AND DISBELIEF: POST-1945 AMERICAN ATTITUDES TOWARD THE AUTHORITY OF KNOWLEDGE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Terry Wagner B.A., Rice University, 2002 M.A., Louisiana State University, 2010 August 2015 “The thunder and lightning strike us, And then we’re shocked to see the likeness Between us and the things we’ve hated for a long, long time.” The Godz “Dirty Windows” 1973 ii Acknowledgements The historians and graduate students at Louisiana State University have been, for me, a genuine community. My graduate advisor, David Culbert, told me the first time I met him that, if I came to LSU and worked with him, I would research and write about my own interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Ap® United States History 2014 Scoring Guidelines
    AP® UNITED STATES HISTORY 2014 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 5 Explain the social, economic, and foreign policy goals of New Right conservatives from the 1960s to the 1980s and assess the degree to which the Reagan administration succeeded in implementing these goals in the 1980s. 0–9 points The 8–9 Essay • Contains a clear, well-developed thesis that addresses all parts of the question. • Develops the thesis with substantial and relevant historical information. • Provides effective analysis of the topic; treatment of multiple parts may be somewhat uneven. • May contain minor errors that do not detract from the quality of the answer. • Is well organized and well written. The 5–7 Essay • Contains a partially developed thesis that addresses the question. • Supports the thesis with some relevant historical information. • Provides some analysis of the topic, but treatment of multiple parts may be uneven. • May contain errors that do not seriously detract from the quality of the essay. • Has acceptable organization and writing. The 2–4 Essay • Contains an unfocused or limited thesis, or simply paraphrases the question. • Provides minimal relevant information, or lists facts with little or no application to the question. • May address the question only partially, with limited or no analysis, or is largely descriptive. • May have major errors. • May be poorly organized or written, or both. The 0–1 Essay • Lacks a thesis or simply repeats the question. • Demonstrates an irrelevant or inappropriate response, or is off topic (0). • Has numerous errors. • Is organized or written so poorly, or both, that it inhibits understanding. The ─ Essay • Is blank.
    [Show full text]
  • Firing Line (Television Program) Broadcast Records
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt6m3nc88c Online items available Register of the Firing Line (Television Program) broadcast records Finding aid prepared by Natasha Porfirenko, revised by Hoover Institution Archives Staff, Max Siekierski, Alexandria Mullings, Stephanie Stewart, and Rachel Bauer Hoover Institution Archives 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA, 94305-6010 (650) 723-3563 [email protected] © 2003, 2009, 2014, 2015 Register of the Firing Line 80040 1 (Television Program) broadcast records Title: Firing Line (Television program) broadcast records Date (inclusive): 1966-1999 Collection Number: 80040 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 190 manuscript boxes, 218 oversize boxes, 3 card file boxes, 1 motion picture film, 352 linear feet of videotapes(948.3 linear feet) Abstract: The Firing Line broadcast records include videotapes from the Firing Line television show, as well as sound recordings, administrative and speaker files, program research files, photographs, transcripts, and other materials from the show. The types of program research materials available for each program are listed in the Episode Guide. The Episode Guide also includes a summary and guest list for each episode, as well as a link to the episode details page on Hoover's digital collections website. When applicable, links for purchasing full-length episodes and the availability of special order DVDs are also included. Digital copies of select records also available at https://digitalcollections.hoover.org. Physical Location: Hoover Institution Archives Contributor: Buckley, William F., Jr., 1925-2008. Contributor: Southern Educational Communications Association Access Collection is open for research. Digital copies of select records also available at https://digitalcollections.hoover.org.
    [Show full text]
  • How Intellectuals and the Ideologies They Market Can Realign American Politics
    The Power of Ideas: How Intellectuals and the Ideologies They Market Can Realign American Politics Charlie Frindt Senior Thesis in Political Science April 22, 2019 Advisor: Stephen J. McGovern Acknowledgements Working on this thesis has been incredibly rewarding and insightful, even if the process itself has been long and arduous. Having the opportunity to work on a subject matter I am not only interested in but passionate about has made the many hours put into this project worthwhile. I would first like to thank my advisor, Steve McGovern, for all the help he has given me in writing this thesis. His guidance and encouragement as well as enthusiasm and interest in the subject I have chosen to explore has kept me motivated and focused over the course of the research and writing process. I would also like to thank Professor Zach Oberfield for introducing me to The Politics That Presidents Make by Stephen Skowronek which became the inspiration for this thesis even if it has diverged from the ideas presented in that book. Finally I would like to thank my friends at Haverford for their constant encouragement over the course of this process and my family for the love and support they have given me over the years. 2 Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4 II. Literature Review .................................................................................................................... 6 Ideological Shifts from the
    [Show full text]