DOCSLIB.ORG

1624 RCOG NSCS Audit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1624 RCOG NSCS Audit The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report ISBN 1-900364-66-2 9 781900 364669 RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit October 2001 The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit October 2001 First published October 2001 © Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 2001 ISBN 1-900364-66-2 The use of registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant laws and regulation and therefore free for general use. Product liability: the RCOG can give no guarantee for information about drug dosage and application thereof contained in this publication. In every individual case the respective user must check its accuracy by consulting other pharmaceutical literature. Published by the RCOG Press at the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 27 Sussex Place Regent’s Park London NW1 4RG Registered Charity No. 213280 Typesetting and printing: FiSH Books, London. This document should be referenced as: J Thomas, S Paranjothy Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. RCOG Press; 2001. All correspondence with regard to the content of this Audit should be addressed to: Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit Tel: +44 (0)20 7772 6342 Email: [email protected] Copies of this publication can be obtained from: RCOG Bookshop Tel: +44 (0)20 7772 6275 Fax: +44 (0)20 7724 5991 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rcog.org.uk Contents List of Tables iv List of Figures vi List of Appendices vi Abbreviations vii Glossary of terms used in the survey viii Contributors and acknowledgements x Foreword xvii Introduction xix 1. Background 1 2. Audit methodology 5 3. Data coverage and response rates 14 4. Methods of delivery 17 5. Caesarean section rate: the influence of population and clinical characteristics 24 6. Decision making before caesarean section 45 7. Classification of urgency of caesarean section 49 8. Decision-to-delivery intervals for emergency caesarean section 54 9. Reducing maternal morbidity from caesarean section 57 10. Organisational factors 60 11. Anaesthetic care 83 12. Maternal views of childbirth 95 13. Obstetricians’ views of childbirth 104 Conclusion 111 References 113 Appendices 119 iii Tables Table 2.1 Levels of evidence Table 4.1 International caesarean section rates Table 4.2 Trends in method of delivery Table 4.3 Method of delivery Table 4.4a Overall, primary and repeat caesarean section rate by region Table 4.4b Elective and emergency caesarean section rate Table 4.5a Caesarean section rate (CSR) for clinical groups: phase one Table 4.5b Caesarean section rate (CSR) for clinical groups: phase two Table 4.6 Primary indication for caesarean section as reported by clinicians Table 5.1a Distribution of demographic characteristics: numbers by region (phase one data, all women) Table 5.1b Distribution of demographic characteristics: phase two data Table 5.2a Caesarean section rate (CSR) by demographic characteristics: phase one Table 5.2b Caesarean section rate (CSR) by demographic characteristics: phase two Table 5.3 Crude and adjusted odds ratios for age and ethnicity Table 5.4a Caesarean section rate (CSR) by gestational age and birth weight: phase one Table 5.4b Caesarean section rate (CSR) according to birthweight and gestational age: phase two Table 5.5a Distribution of onset of labour: numbers by region Table 5.6b Onset of labour and caesarean section rate (CSR) Table 5.7 Term singleton cephalic pregnancies: caesarean section rate (CSR) Table 5.7a Distribution of birthweight by gestational age: numbers by region (phase one) Table 5.7b Distribution of birthweight by gestational age (phase two) Table 5.8a Distribution of breech babies according to gestational age: numbers by region Table 5.8b Caesarean section rate (CSR) for breech babies according to gestational age Table 5.9a Distribution of twin pregnancies according to gestational age: numbers by region Table 5.9b Caesarean section rate (CSR) for twin pregnancies according to gestational age Table 6.1 Decision making before caesarean section (CS) Table 7.1 Classification of urgency of caesarean section: binary versus four grades of urgency Table 7.2 Classification of caesarean section by grades of urgency, by region Table 7.3 Primary indications for caesarean section (as reported by clinicians) by grade of urgency Table 8.1 Decision to delivery interval for acute obstetric emergencies Table 9.1 Reducing morbidity from caesarean section (CS) Table 10.1 Number of inpatient beds (antenatal, intrapartum, postnatal) and admission rooms by region Table 10.2 Size of maternity units: percentage (%) of units within a region according to number of deliveries Table 10.3 Provision of neonatal services (national and regional) Table 10.4 Median percentage of days (or nights) for each unit with at least 1.15 midwives per woman in labour by region iv The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Table 10.5 Number and percentage of units where the standard of at least 1.15 midwives per woman in labour was met at least 60% of the time (day or night) by region Table 10.6 Median (IQR) percentage of days (or nights) for each unit when there was at least one midwife per woman in labour by region Table 10.7 Mean ratio (SD) of total number of midwives to total number of women on labour ward, by region Table 10.8 Midwifery models for staffing Table 10.9 Median number of consultant obstetricians and gynaecologists employed per unit per 1000 deliveries Table 10.10 Median (IQR) percentage of days (or nights) for each unit when a consultant obstetrician ward round occurred, according to region Table 10.11 Median (IQR) percentage of days (or nights) for each unit when there was a consultant obstetrician present, according to region Table 10.12 Dedicated obstetric consultant cover per week for units with greater than 1000 delivery rate, by region Table 10.13 Consultant presence at potentially complicated caesarean deliveries Table 10.14 Labour ward staffing and facilities Table 10.15 Labour ward facilities: obstetric theatres Table 10.16 Availability of fetal heart monitors Table 10.17 Audit standards: staffing and facilities survey by region Table 11.1 Regional analgesia service-provision Table 11.2 Anaesthesia: units meeting audit standards for regional anaesthesia and acid prophylaxis Table 11.3 Anaesthesia: unit policies for acid prophylaxis Table 11.4 Estimated blood loss at caesarean section Table 11.5 Anaesthesia: units meeting audit standard for transfusion services Table 11.6 Anaesthesia: units meeting audit standard for monitoring equipment during anaesthesia Table 11.7 Availability of high-dependency or intensive care units and facilities available within maternity high-dependency units Table 11.8 Mothers who needed high-dependency or intensive care after caesarean section, by location of facility Table11.9 Distribution of units with operational anaesthetic guidelines in labour ward, by region Table 11.10 Units meeting anaesthetic services and staffing standards Table 12.1 Characteristics of women responding to the maternal survey Table 12.2 Maternal preferences for childbirth Table12.3 Maternal survey: views on childbirth in general Table 13.1 Clinical management Table 13. 2 Clinician advice for women in labour who have had a previous caesarean section Table 13.3 Clinical management: response to maternal request for a caesarean section in the absence of any medical indications v Figures Figure 1 International caesarean section rate Figure 2 Caesarean section rate by maternal age Figure 3 Information about birth Figure 4 Maternal preferences for this birth Figure 5 Maternal views on childbirth Figure 6 Maternal birth preferences by preferences about mode of delivery Figure 7 Clinicians’ views on childbirth Figure 8 Clinicians’ views about risks and benefits of elective caesarean section Appendices A Phase one hospitals by each region B Phase two hospitals C Data collection tools i Denominator data collection form ii Denominator data collection form key iii Clinical data form iv Clinical data form key v Organisational survey: staffing and facilities for labour ward vi Organisational survey: obstetric anaesthetic services vii Data verification checklist viii Labour ward diary D Phase two data collection tools i Maternal survey ii Survey of clinicians’ views vi Abbreviations used in the survey CS Caesarean section CSR Caesarean section rate(s) CTG Cardiotocograph(y) ECG Electrocardiogram EFM Electronic fetal monitoring ECV External cephalic version FBS Fetal blood sampling FHR Fetal heart rate HDU High-dependency unit HELLP Haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelet count HES Hospital episode statistics ITU Intensive care unit LREC Local research and ethics committee MREC Multicentre research and ethics committee NCEPOD National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths NICU Neonatal intensive care unit NSCSA National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit ODP Operating department practitioner OR Odds ratio SCBU Special care baby unit SROM Spontaneous rupture of membranes RCT Randomised controlled trial VBAC Vaginal birth after caesarean section WHO World Health Organization vii Glossary of terms Auditable standard An agreed standard against which practice can be assessed. Case–control study The study reviews exposures or risk factors, comparing the exposure in people who have the outcome of interest, for example the disease or condition (i.e. the cases) with patients from the same population who do not have the outcome (i.e. controls). Cohort study The study involves identification of two groups (cohorts) of patients, one of which has received the exposure of interest and one of which has not. These groups are followed forward to see if they develop the outcome (i.e. the disease or condition) of interest. Confounder A factor that may offer an alternative explanation for the observed association between an exposure and the outcome in which we are interested.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessment of DUACS Sentinel-3A Altimetry Data in the Coastal Band of the European Seas: Comparison with Tide Gauge Measurements
    remote sensing Article Assessment of DUACS Sentinel-3A Altimetry Data in the Coastal Band of the European Seas: Comparison with Tide Gauge Measurements Antonio Sánchez-Román 1,* , Ananda Pascual 1, Marie-Isabelle Pujol 2, Guillaume Taburet 2, Marta Marcos 1,3 and Yannice Faugère 2 1 Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados, C/Miquel Marquès, 21, 07190 Esporles, Spain; [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (M.M.) 2 Collecte Localisation Satellites, Parc Technologique du Canal, 8-10 rue Hermès, 31520 Ramonville-Saint-Agne, France; [email protected] (M.-I.P.); [email protected] (G.T.); [email protected] (Y.F.) 3 Departament de Física, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Cra. de Valldemossa, km 7.5, 07122 Palma, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-971-61-0906 Received: 26 October 2020; Accepted: 1 December 2020; Published: 4 December 2020 Abstract: The quality of the Data Unification and Altimeter Combination System (DUACS) Sentinel-3A altimeter data in the coastal area of the European seas is investigated through a comparison with in situ tide gauge measurements. The comparison was also conducted using altimetry data from Jason-3 for inter-comparison purposes. We found that Sentinel-3A improved the root mean square differences (RMSD) by 13% with respect to the Jason-3 mission. In addition, the variance in the differences between the two datasets was reduced by 25%. To explain the improved capture of Sea Level Anomaly by Sentinel-3A in the coastal band, the impact of the measurement noise on the synthetic aperture radar altimeter, the distance to the coast, and Long Wave Error correction applied on altimetry data were checked.
    [Show full text]
  • SOP 402 Sentinel Rodent Exposure
    STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES DIVISION OF COMPARATIVE MEDICINE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA SOP #402.6 Date Issued: 10/98 Date Revised: 5/17 Page 1 of 2 _____________________________________________________________________________________ TITLE: Sentinel Rodent Exposure SCOPE: All Authorized Personnel RESPONSIBILITY: Facility Manager and Technical Staff PURPOSE: Expose Sentinel Animals to Possible Pathogens in Animal Rooms I. PURPOSE 1. To outline the proper procedures for exposing sentinel rodents to soiled bedding. II. RESPONSIBILITY 1. The Facility Manager is responsible for ensuring: a. All animal care staff is adequately trained to perform the husbandry practices described. b. Implementation of the procedures described. 2. It is the responsibility of the animal care staff to read, understand, and follow the procedures outlined below. III. PROCEDURES 1. Sentinel rodents are pair housed in individual microisolator or ventilated cages, and are placed on each rack with like species with the exception of isolation housing rooms located in the Stabile Research Building (SRB) which will use pooled fecal samples in conjunction with collection of air handling unit/rack exhaust plenums sampling in lieu of dirty bedding sentinels. Racks housing mice on both sides will have 2 sentinel cages, one located on each side of the rack. 2. All racks must be labeled with the rack number (see SOP #410). In addition, racks housing mice on both sides must be labeled to identify one side as A and the opposite side as B. 3. To maximize exposure to potential infectious agents, upon arrival all sentinel rodents are housed solely on soiled bedding obtained from other cages on the same rack/side. Mouse sentinels in cage A are housed on the soiled bedding obtained from mice housed on rack-side A.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Information Kit
    2021 Media Information Kit SSentinel.com Serving the Middle Peninsula and Surrounding Area of Virginia 804-758-2328 • www.ssentinel.com 276 Virginia Street • Urbanna, Virginia 23175 Advertising email: [email protected] From our customers: We are happy advertisers at the Southside Sentinel! Chuck’s HVAC began adver- tising when we opened our doors in February 2013. Wendy worked efficiently with us to help meet both our advertising and budget needs and continues to keep us updated on additional advertising opportunities. Chuck’s HVAC advertises weekly and is now in the same location each week. Our customers have told us that’s where they find us! Chuck Brown ___________________________________________________ What’s important to a small town business? Local customers. Everyone reads the Southside Sentinel from the first to the last page. An ad in the Sentinel attracts local cus- tomers plus all the out of towners who regularly read the paper. Affordable, effective-all you could ask for from your advertising. Raynell Smith, Nauti Nells, Deltaville ___________________________________________________ The Hartfield Volunteer Fire Department Thrift Store started advertising in the Southside Sentinel at the beginning this summer in the yard sales column. Its outreach to our community and surrounding areas has been very instrumental in the increase of our business. If you want to get “out of the box” give Hannah a call at 804.758.2328 and they will customize a creative new design just for your specific business need. Look for us in the Southside Sentinel. Our store is at the firehouse on Twiggs Ferry Road in downtown Hartfield. We are open Wednesday and Saturday 9am until 3pm.
    [Show full text]
  • (NCCN) Breast Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines
    NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) Breast Cancer Version 5.2020 — July 15, 2020 NCCN.org NCCN Guidelines for Patients® available at www.nccn.org/patients Continue Version 5.2020, 07/15/20 © 2020 National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®), All rights reserved. NCCN Guidelines® and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN. NCCN Guidelines Index NCCN Guidelines Version 5.2020 Table of Contents Breast Cancer Discussion *William J. Gradishar, MD/Chair ‡ † Sharon H. Giordano, MD, MPH † Sameer A. Patel, MD Ÿ Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer The University of Texas Fox Chase Cancer Center Center of Northwestern University MD Anderson Cancer Center Lori J. Pierce, MD § *Benjamin O. Anderson, MD/Vice-Chair ¶ Matthew P. Goetz, MD ‡ † University of Michigan Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Mayo Clinic Cancer Center Rogel Cancer Center Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Lori J. Goldstein, MD † Hope S. Rugo, MD † Jame Abraham, MD ‡ † Fox Chase Cancer Center UCSF Helen Diller Family Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/ Comprehensive Cancer Center Steven J. Isakoff, MD, PhD † University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center Massachusetts General Hospital Amy Sitapati, MD Þ and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute Cancer Center UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center Rebecca Aft, MD, PhD ¶ Jairam Krishnamurthy, MD † Karen Lisa Smith, MD, MPH † Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes- Fred & Pamela Buffet Cancer Center The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Jewish Hospital and Washington Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Janice Lyons, MD § Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/ Mary Lou Smith, JD, MBA ¥ Doreen Agnese, MD ¶ University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center Research Advocacy Network The Ohio State University Comprehensive and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital Hatem Soliman, MD † and Solove Research Institute P.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Medals and Awards Manual, Comdtinst M1650.25E
    Coast Guard Military Medals and Awards Manual COMDTINST M1650.25E 15 AUGUST 2016 COMMANDANT US Coast Guard Stop 7200 United States Coast Guard 2703 Martin Luther King Jr Ave SE Washington, DC 20593-7200 Staff Symbol: CG PSC-PSD-ma Phone: (202) 795-6575 COMDTINST M1650.25E 15 August 2016 COMMANDANT INSTRUCTION M1650.25E Subj: COAST GUARD MILITARY MEDALS AND AWARDS MANUAL Ref: (a) Uniform Regulations, COMDTINST M1020.6 (series) (b) Recognition Programs Manual, COMDTINST M1650.26 (series) (c) Navy and Marine Corps Awards Manual, SECNAVINST 1650.1 (series) 1. PURPOSE. This Manual establishes the authority, policies, procedures, and standards governing the military medals and awards for all Coast Guard personnel Active and Reserve and all other service members assigned to duty with the Coast Guard. 2. ACTION. All Coast Guard unit Commanders, Commanding Officers, Officers-In-Charge, Deputy/Assistant Commandants and Chiefs of Headquarters staff elements must comply with the provisions of this Manual. Internet release is authorized. 3. DIRECTIVES AFFECTED. Medals and Awards Manual, COMDTINST M1650.25D is cancelled. 4. DISCLAIMER. This guidance is not a substitute for applicable legal requirements, nor is it itself a rule. It is intended to provide operational guidance for Coast Guard personnel and is not intended to nor does it impose legally-binding requirements on any party outside the Coast Guard. 5. MAJOR CHANGES. Major changes to this Manual include: Renaming of the manual to distinguish Military Medals and Awards from other award programs; removal of the Recognition Programs from Chapter 6 to create the new Recognition Manual, COMDTINST M1650.26; removal of the Department of Navy personal awards information from Chapter 2; update to the revocation of awards process; clarification of the concurrent clearance process for issuance of awards to Coast Guard Personnel from other U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • SP-1322/2 Sentinel-2
    → Sentinel-2 ESA’s Optical High-Resolution Mission for GMeS Operational Services SP-1322/1 SP-1322/2 March 2012 → Sentinel-2 ESA’s Optical High-Resolution Mission for GMeS Operational Services Acknowledgements In the preparation of this publication, ESA acknowledges the contributions of the following organisations and individuals: GMES programme, ESA Sentinel-2 Project and Science Division Teams at ESTEC, Noordwijk, the Netherlands: F. Bertini, O. Brand, S. Carlier, U. Del Bello, M. Drusch, R. Duca, V. Fernandez, C. Ferrario, M.H. Ferreira, C. Isola, V. Kirschner, P. Laberinti, M. Lambert, G. Mandorlo, P. Marcos, P. Martimort, S. Moon, P. Oldeman, M. Palomba, J. Patterson, M. Prochazka, M.H. Schricke- Didot, C. Schwieso, J. Skoog, F. Spoto, J. Stjernevi, O. Sy, B. Teianu and C. Wildner ESA Sentinel-2 Payload Data Ground Segment and Mission Management Team at ESRIN, Frascati, Italy: O. Arino, P. Bargellini, M. Berger, E. Cadau, O. Colin, F. Gascon, B. Hoersch, H. Laur, B. Lopez Fernandez and E. Monjoux ESA Sentinel-2 Flight Operations Segment Team at ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany: M. Collins, F. Marchese and J. Piñeiro National space agencies working in partnership with ESA: — CNES, Toulouse, France: S. Ballarin, C. Dechoz, P. Henry, S. Lachérade, A. Meygret, B. Petrucci, S. Sylvander and T. Trémas. CNES is in charge of Sentinel-2 image quality activities, including monitoring mission performance and assisting ESA with the prototyping, development and verification of payload data processing and product quality monitoring. — DLR, Bonn, Germany: H. Hauschildt, R. Meyer and S. Phillip-May. DLR is responsible for providing the Optical Communication Payload (OCP), developed by Tesat (Germany), which is expected to enhance the distribution of mission data to receiving and processing stations in real time through Alphasat and later on EDRS.
    [Show full text]
  • Sentinel High Level Operations Plan (HLOP)
    ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use esrin Sentinel High Level Operations Plan (HLOP) Prepared by Copernicus Space Component Mission Management Team Reference COPE-S1OP-EOPG-PL-15-0020 Issue 3 Revision 0 Date of Issue 22.07.2019 Status Approved Document Type PL Distribution COM + PB EO ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Issue 2 Revision 0 Reason for change Date Pages Paragraph(s) First revision (draft for Commission review) 15.06.2015 See track changes Second update following comments from Commission 15.08.2015 See track changes Third and final update following final comments from 8.10.2015 See track changes Commission Issue 2 Revision 1 Reason for change Date Pages Paragraph(s) Formal revision (draft for Commission review) 7.11.2016 See track changes Formal revision 27.01.2017 Issue 2 Revision 2 Reason for change Date Pages Paragraph(s) Formal revision (draft for Commission review) 06.03.2018 See track changes Formal revision 29.03.2018 Issue 3 Revision 0 Reason for change Date Pages Paragraph(s) Formal revision (draft for Commission review) 28.06.2019 See track changes Formal revision 22.07.2019 COPE-S1OP-EOPG-PL-15-0020 Page 3 /78 Issue 3 Rev 0 ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Table of contents: 1 INTRODUCTION 6 1.1 SCOPE 6 1.2 VALIDITY, APPROVAL AND PROCEDURE FOR FUTURE REVISIONS 6 1.3 STRUCTURE OF THE DOCUMENT 7 2 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 8 3 SENTINEL MISSIONS BACKGROUND 9 3.1 SENTINEL MISSIONS OVERVIEW 9 3.2 SENTINEL MISSIONS OBJECTIVES OVERVIEW 9 3.2.1 SENTINEL-1 9 3.2.2 SENTINEL-2 10 3.2.3 SENTINEL-3 10 3.2.4 SENTINEL-4 10 3.2.5
    [Show full text]
  • American Sentinel for 1893
    „ Equal and Exact Justice to all Men, of Whatever State or 'Persuasion, Feligious or Political.” VOLUME 8. NEW YORK, OCTOBER 19, 1893. NUMBER 41. acknowledgment and acceptance of, and much as desiring that which is his broth- American Sentinel. obedience to, all divine truth. Brother- er's, and 'War no false witness against him ; PUBLISHED WEEKLY, BY THE hood with all the children of God would he must in all things give ear and credence PACIFIC PRESS PUBLISHING COMPANY, then necessarily and inevitably follow. to the Word of the Father, and love the No. 43 BOND STREET, NEW YORK. But if the second clause be first admitted, coming of his Elder Brother. Entered at the New York Post-Office. brotherhood presupposes a common father, EDITOR, - - - ALONZO T. JONES. and he, being All-father, is consequently AT the Parliament of Religions there ASSOCIATE EDITORS, CALVIN P. BOLLMAN. Creator and God. The two clauses of the WILLIAM E. MC KEE. was one gospel that was possible to be expression answer to each other logically, preached to the full, and no warning sign " BROTHERHOOD of man ! "—a phrase as they do rhetorically. The antecedent be given, and that was the gospel of " the full of promise! "Fatherhood of God !"— requires its consequent, and the consequent brotherhood of man." To that all gave a benediction upon humanity! What do its antecedent. Thus the action of the assent, at least in theory. Pagan, Chris- these phrases mean ? Join them : " Fa- human mind by the unavoidable sequences tian, infidel, all struck hands in allegiance therhood of God and brotherhood of of its necessary processes bring man inevit- to that doctrine.
    [Show full text]
  • Mike Oldfield XXV: the Essential Mike Oldfield Mp3, Flac, Wma
    Mike Oldfield XXV: The Essential Mike Oldfield mp3, flac, wma DOWNLOAD LINKS (Clickable) Genre: Electronic / Rock Album: XXV: The Essential Mike Oldfield Country: Europe Released: 1997 Style: Pop Rock, Synth-pop, Ambient MP3 version RAR size: 1372 mb FLAC version RAR size: 1590 mb WMA version RAR size: 1649 mb Rating: 4.9 Votes: 839 Other Formats: AHX XM TTA VOX DXD APE AU Tracklist Hide Credits Tubular Bells (Excerpt) 1 4:16 Producer – Simon Heyworth, Tom Newman Hergest Ridge (Excerpt) 2 4:54 Producer – Tom Newman 3 Ommadawn (Excerpt) 6:57 4 Incantations (Excerpt) 4:38 Moonlight Shadow 5 3:35 Producer – Simon Phillips 6 Portsmouth 2:00 7 Good News 1:44 Sentinel (Remix) 8 3:56 Producer – Tom Newman , Trevor Horn The Bell (Remix) 9 3:06 MC – Viv Stanshall*Producer – Tom Newman , Trevor HornRemix – Mike Oldfield 10 Let There Be Light 4:19 11 Only Time Will Tell 4:25 12 The Voyager 4:22 13 Women Of Ireland 6:27 14 Tubular Bells III (Excerpt) 3:40 Companies, etc. Phonographic Copyright (p) – Warner Music UK Ltd. Phonographic Copyright (p) – Virgin Records Ltd. Copyright (c) – Oldfield Music Ltd. Copyright (c) – Oldfield Music Overseas Ltd. Made By – Warner Music Manufacturing Europe Credits Artwork By [Design & Art] – Bill Smith Studio, London Engineer – Mike Oldfield (tracks: 10 to 14) Photography – David Scheinman Producer, Written-By – Mike Oldfield Notes This compilation (P) 1997 Warner Music UK Ltd./Virgin Records Ltd. (C) 1997 Oldfield Music Limited for the United Kingdom and Oldfield Music Overseas Limited for the world outside the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • EURASIA MAILORDER British List 2021/8/2 Updated How to Order
    EURASIA MAILORDER British List 2021/9/1 updated How to Order 10CC [HOW DARE YOU!] (UK / MERCURY / 75 / FOC/WI) EX/EX USD 16 / EURO14 10CC [SAME] (UK / UK RECORD / 74 / WI) EX/EX USD 25 / EURO21 10CC [SHEET MUSIC] (UK / UK RECORD / 74 / WI) EX/EX USD 23 / EURO19 11.59 [THIS OUR SACRIFICE OF PRAISE] (UK / DOVETAIL / 74 / WI) EX+/EX USD 180 / EURO152 9.30 FLY [SAME] (UK / EMBER / 72 / FOC) EX+/EX USD 342 / EURO288 ABSOLUTE ELSEWHERE [IN SEARCH OF ANCIENT GODS] (UK / WB / 76 / GIMC/WB) EX/EX USD 61 / EURO52 ABSOLUTE ELSEWHERE [IN SEARCH OF ANCIENT GODS] (UK / WB / 76 / GIMC/WB/SOC) EX/EX USD 34 / EURO29 ABSOLUTE ELSEWHERE [IN SEARCH OF ANCIENT GODS] (UK / WB / 76 / GIMC/WB) EX+/EX USD 52 / EURO44 ACHOR AND FRIENDS [HOSANNA TO THE SON OF DAVID] ( / / / ) EX+/EX+ USD 52 / EURO44 ADRIAN WAGNEFR [DISTANCES BETWEEN US] (UK / ATLANTIC / 74 / ) M-/EX USD 43 / EURO36 ADRIAN WAGNEFR [INSTINCTS] (UK / CHARISMA / 77 / ) EX/EX USD 34 / EURO29 AFFINITY [SAME] (ITA / AKARMA / / FOC) M-/M- USD 34 / EURO29 AFTER THE FIRE [SIGNS OF CHANGE] (UK / RAPID / 78 / WI) EX/EX USD 144 / EURO121 AFTER THE FIRE [SIGNS OF CHANGE] (UK / RAPID / 78 / ) EX/EX USD 108 / EURO91 AL ET AL [STRANGE AFFER] (UK / ARNY'S SHACK / / ) VG/VG+ USD 252 / EURO212 ALAN BOWN [STRETCHING OUT] (UK / ISLAND / 71 / FOC) EX/EX USD 34 / EURO29 ALAN BOWN [STRETCHING OUT] (UK / ISLAND / 71 / FOC) EX/EX USD 25 / EURO21 ALAN COHEN BAND [BLACK BROWN & BEIGE] (UK / ARGO / 73 / WI) EX/EX USD 90 / EURO76 ALAN SKIDMORE QUINTET [TCB] (UK / PHILIPS / 70 / ) EX+/EX+ USD 295 / EURO248 ALEANNA [SAME] (UK /
    [Show full text]
  • The American Sentinel. and Addressed Two Meetings Held in His People Are the Only Means of Reforming PUBLISHED WEEKLY, by the Honor
    u1.1111111 s'i!"!!',1111. Equal and exact justice to all men, of whatever state or persuasion, religious or political.—Thomas yefferson. VOLUME 6. NEW YORK, MAY 28, 1891. NUMBER 22. eral delegations from surrounding towns, the people, whereas the fact is, that the The American Sentinel. and addressed two meetings held in his people are the only means of reforming PUBLISHED WEEKLY, BY THE honor. On both occasions his remarks the government. The National Reform- were mildly religious, appropriate to the ers and all other religio-political organ- PACIFIC PRESS PUBLISHING COMPANY, day as it is generally regarded. At 6 izations, seem to think that if a reforma- No. 43 BOND ST., NEW YORK. o'clock P. M., the train, in harmony with tory law can by any means be lobbied into Entered at the New York Post Office as Second Class Matter. orders from the President, left Glenwood the statute book, that reform is already Springs, and the party spent the night in far on its way toward completion, whereas EDITOR, - - - ALONZO T. JONES. their car on a side track twenty-four miles I shall show that any attempt of govern- ASSOCIATE EDITORS, from the scene of Mr. Harrison's wrecked ment to reform the people or advance C. P. BOLLMAN, W. H. Mc KEE. resolution to observe Sunday according to them morally, religiously or intellectually, the most approved Presbyterian fashion. must inevitably tend diametrically oppo- THE only purpose for which power Our opinion, however, is that it is none of site to the desired result. call be rightfully exercised over any mem- the Christian Statesman's business how In any form of government, unless it be ber of a civilized community, against his the President spent Sunday.
    [Show full text]
  • All Clear? Meerkats Attend to Contextual Information in Close Calls to Coordinate Vigilance
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2011) 65:1927–1934 DOI 10.1007/s00265-011-1202-6 ORIGINAL PAPER All clear? Meerkats attend to contextual information in close calls to coordinate vigilance Simon W. Townsend & Markus Zöttl & Marta B. Manser Received: 25 January 2011 /Revised: 3 May 2011 /Accepted: 18 May 2011 /Published online: 7 June 2011 # Springer-Verlag 2011 Abstract Socio-demographic factors, such as group size after an individual has briefly scanned the surrounding and their effect on predation vulnerability, have, in addition environment for predators (‘Guarding’ close calls). Here, to intrinsic factors, dominated as explanations when we firstly show that these Guarding and Foraging close call attempting to understand animal vigilance behaviour. It is variants are in fact acoustically distinct and secondly generally assumed that animals evaluate these external subjects are less vigilant (in terms of frequency and time) factors visually; however, many socially foraging species when exposed to Guarding close call playbacks than when adopt a foraging technique that directly compromises the they hear Foraging close calls. We argue that this is the first visual system. In these instances, such species may instead evidence for socially foraging animals using the informa- rely more on the acoustical medium to assess their relative tion encoded within calls, the main adaptive function of risk and guide their subsequent anti-predator behaviour. We which is unrelated to immediate predator encounters, to addressed this question in the socially foraging meerkat coordinate their vigilance behaviour. In addition, these (Suricata suricatta). Meerkats forage with their head down, results provide new insights into the potential cognitive but at the same time frequently produce close calls mechanisms underlying anti-predator behaviour and sug- (‘Foraging’ close calls).
    [Show full text]