DOCSLIB.ORG

Sex Differences in Jealousy: a Meta-Analytic Examination ⁎ Brad J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sex Differences in Jealousy: a Meta-Analytic Examination ⁎ Brad J Evolution and Human Behavior xx (2012) xxx–xxx Review Article Sex differences in jealousy: a meta-analytic examination ⁎ Brad J. Sagarina, , Amy L. Martina, Savia A. Coutinhoa, John E. Edlundb, Lily Patela, John J. Skowronskia, Bettina Zengela aNorthern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA bRochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA Initial receipt 5 January 2012; final revision received 27 February 2012 Abstract The theory of evolved sex differences in jealousy predicts sex differences in responses to sexual infidelities and emotional infidelities. Critics have argued that such differences are absent in studies that use continuous measures to assess responses to hypothetical infidelities or in studies that assess responses to real infidelities. These criticisms were tested in two random-effects meta-analyses of 40 published and unpublished papers (providing 209 effect sizes from 47 independent samples) that measured sex differences in jealousy using continuous measures. A significant, theory-supportive sex difference emerged across 45 independent samples using continuous measures of responses to hypothetical infidelities, g*=0.258, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.188, 0.328], pb.00001. Measured emotion significantly moderated effect size. Effects were strongest when measures assessed distress/upset (g*=0.337) and jealousy (g*=0.309). Other commonly measured negative emotions yielded weaker effects, including hurt (g*=0.161), anger (g*=0.074), and disgust (g*=0.012). Across the 45 independent samples, six significant moderators emerged: random sampling, population type (student vs. nonstudent samples), age, inclusion of a forced-choice question, number of points in the response scale, and year of publication. A significant, theory-supportive effect also emerged across seven studies assessing reactions to actual infidelities, g*=0.234, 95% CI [0.020, 0.448], p=.03. Results demonstrate that the sex difference in jealousy neither is an artifact of response format nor is limited to responses to hypothetical infidelities. © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Jealousy; Evolution; Sex differences; Meta-analysis 1. Introduction As evidenced by citation rates (336 for Buss et al. and 284 for Daly et al. according to the Web of Science as of this Men and women both react with jealousy in response to writing), the theory has been influential and has inspired a either a partner's sexual infidelity or his/her emotional number of additional predictions and studies (Buss & infidelity. However, according to the theory of evolved sex Haselton, 2005). However, the theory has also caused differences in jealousy (Buss, Larsen, Westen, & Semmel- substantial controversy. Indeed, many papers critical of the roth, 1992; Daly, Wilson, & Weghorst, 1982; Symons, theory have appeared in some of psychology's flagship 1979), the challenge of ensuring paternal investment exerted journals, including Psychological Science (e.g., DeSteno, selective pressures on women that boosted their jealousy 2010; Harris, 2002), Journal of Personality and Social response to emotional infidelity. In comparison, the theory Psychology (e.g., DeSteno, Bartlett, Braverman, & Salovey, suggests that the challenge of paternal uncertainty exerted 2002), Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (e.g., selective pressures on men that boosted their jealousy Berman & Frazier, 2005), Personality and Social Psychol- response to sexual infidelity. Hence, the sexes are theorized ogy Review (e.g., Harris, 2003a), and Trends in Cognitive to differ in the patterns of jealousy exhibited in response to Sciences (e.g., Buller, 2005). emotional infidelities and sexual infidelities. One source of controversy lies in methodology. A primary methodology used to test the theory of evolved sex differences in jealousy is the forced-choice dilemma ⁎ Corresponding author. Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA. Tel.: +1 815 753 7067; fax: +1 815 753 pioneered by Buss et al. (1992). This methodology instructs 8088. women and men to think about a hypothetical situation in E-mail address: [email protected] (B.J. Sagarin). which their romantic partner has become interested in 1090-5138/$ – see front matter © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.02.006 2 B.J. Sagarin et al. / Evolution and Human Behavior xx (2012) xxx–xxx someone else and to indicate which type of infidelity (sexual have failed to replicate the sex difference typically obtained or emotional) would cause greater distress. For example, with forced-choice measures. Similar nonreplications have Buss et al. presented participants with the following choice: been reported when participants reported their reactions to actual infidelity experiences (e.g., Harris, 2002). However, Please think of a serious committed romantic relationship that the data in these domains are mixed. For example, results of you have had in the past, that you currently have, or that you some studies using continuous measures do evince signif- would like to have. Imagine that you discover that the person icant sex differences (e.g., Edlund & Sagarin, 2009). with whom you've been seriously involved became interested Moreover, sex differences have emerged in some studies in someone else. What would distress or upset you more assessing responses to actual infidelity experiences (e.g., (please circle only one): Edlund, Heider, Scherer, Farc, & Sagarin, 2006). (A) Imagining your partner forming a deep emotional As noted by Edlund and Sagarin (2009, p. 76), both attachment to that person. proponents and opponents of the theory of evolved sex (B) Imagining your partner enjoying passionate sexual differences in jealousy have tended to overgeneralize the intercourse with that other person. (p. 252) results yielded by their own studies: Researchers on both sides of the debate regarding sex Consistent with predictions of the theory of evolved sex differences in jealousy have often pointed to single studies differences in jealousy, a significantly greater proportion of as providing sufficient support for their position. Opponents men (60%) than women (17%) indicated that the sexual of the theory have sometimes considered a single failure to infidelity would cause them greater distress. Subsequent replicate the sex difference as sufficient evidence to refute the research using this method has generally duplicated this effect, theory. Likewise proponents of the theory have often so much so that results from Harris' (2003a) meta-analysis considered a single significant sex difference as firmly demonstrated that the sex difference in jealousy when assessed establishing the theory. We suggest that both sides should via the forced-choice method is reliable and robust. be wary of placing too much weight on the results of a single However, evidence favoring the theory has proven study—a tendency Tversky and Kahneman (1971) labeled the elusive when jealousy is assessed using continuous measures belief in the law of small numbers. (e.g., when response scales separately assess jealousy When the debate was first enjoined, the small number of responses to sexual infidelity and emotional infidelity). studies that had been conducted made it difficult to Such elusiveness has led critics to suggest that the sex definitively assess the conclusions offered by both sides in difference in jealousy is an artifact of the forced-choice the debate. However, one consequence of the debate was that method. For example, DeSteno (2010) argues: people kept on doing research, and the number of empirical studies examining sex differences in jealousy is now When jealousy related to sexual and emotional infidelity is assessed using various non-forced-choice response formats, sufficient to statistically address the controversy. To this no sex differences emerge; men and women both report end, we conducted several meta-analyses that serve to greater jealousy in response to sexual infidelity (DeSteno et synthesize the corpus of studies that examined sex al., 2002; Harris, 2003a). Yet a sex difference in jealousy differences in jealousy using continuous measures. These readily emerges from these same people when they complete meta-analyses pursued three main objectives: (a) to deter- a forced-choice measure (DeSteno & Salovey, 1996; DeSteno mine whether there is or is not a sex difference in jealousy et al., 2002)…. when jealousy is assessed with continuous measures, (b) to determine whether the sex difference appears in response to A second perceived shortcoming stems from the hypo- actual infidelity experiences (and whether the effects thetical scenarios used in most studies examining responses observed in those studies differ from those obtained in the to infidelity. These studies essentially assess participants' hypothetical scenario studies), and (c) to identify moderators predictions about how they would feel, not their emotional that can help to explain the diversity present in past findings. responses to actual infidelity. Citing potential errors in Before describing the meta-analyses, one issue needs to affective forecasts, critics have cast doubt on the results of be addressed: the proper statistical interpretation of the such research. Indeed, as noted by DeSteno (2010), Gilbert, results from the studies that have employed continuous Wilson, and their colleagues have documented systematic measures. This is discussed in the section that follows. errors in people's predictions of how they will feel
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EMOTION REGULATION HANDOUT 6 (Emotion Regulation Worksheets 4, 4A) (P
    Life Management Associates, LLC 600 Dewey Blvd., Suite B Office: 406-782-4778 Butte, MT 59701 Fax: 406-782-1318 EMOTION REGULATION HANDOUT EMOTION REGULATION HANDOUT 6 (Emotion Regulation Worksheets 4, 4a) (p. 1 of 10) Ways to Describe Emotions ANGER WORDS anger bitterness fury indignation vengefulness aggravation exasperation grouchiness irritation wrath agitation ferocity grumpiness outrage annoyance frustration hostility rage Prompting Events for Feeling Anger • Having an important goal blocked. • Not having things turn out as expected. • You or someone you care about being • Physical or emotional pain. attacked or threatened by others. • Other: • Losing power, status, or respect. Interpretations of Events That Prompt Feelings of Anger • Believing that you have been treated unfairly. • Rigidly thinking, “I’m right.” • Blaming. • Judging that the situation is illegitimate or • Believing that important goals are being wrong. blocked or stopped. • Ruminating about the event that set off the • Believing that things “should” be different anger in the first place. than they are. • Other: Biological Changes and Experiences of Anger • Muscles tightening. • Being unable to stop tears. • Teeth clamping together. • Wanting to hit someone, bang the wall, throw • Hands clenching. something, blow up. • Feeling your face flush or get hot. • Wanting to hurt someone. • Feeling like you are going to explode. • Other: Expressions and Actions of Anger • Physically or verbally attacking. • Clenching your hands or fists. • Making aggressive or threatening gestures. • Frowning, not smiling, mean expression. • Pounding, throwing things, breaking things. • Brooding or withdrawing from others. • Walking heavily, stomping, slamming doors. • Crying. • Walking out. • Grinning. • Using a loud, quarrelsome, or sarcastic voice. • A red or flushed face.
    [Show full text]
  • College Students' Attitudes on the Causes of Infidelity
    College Students’ Attitudes on the Causes of Infidelity College Students’ Attitudes on the Causes of Infidelity Kaisa Lee and Jamie Koss Undergraduate Students, Human Development and Family Studies Key Words: Infidelity, committed relationships, relationship dissatisfaction, sexual attraction Abstract Infidelity is a problem in today’s society associated with instability in relationships and the high divorce rates. The study consisted of 23 male and female students at a Midwestern university. It was hypothesized that males would perceive sexual attraction as a primary cause of infidelity while females would perceive relationship dissatisfaction as a primary cause. Survey data was statistically analyzed using frequencies, cross-tabulations and a reliability analysis. Findings supported the literature and hypothesis in that more males viewed sexual attraction as a primary cause of infidelity and more females viewed relationship dissatisfaction as a primary cause. It is important for practitioners to be aware of the problems infidelity causes in relationships and further researchers could investigate root causes for preventative and proactive actions. Introduction Roughly 50% of individuals in married relationships engage in some form of infidelity at some point in their marriage (Drigotas, Safstrom, & Gentilia, 1999). It is no wonder researchers are studying this serious relationship transgression more to better understand the root of the problem. In several studies, more than fifty percent of both men and women in college dating relationships have been involved in some form of infidelity behavior (Lewandowski & Ackerman, 2006). Infidelity can be portrayed differently in society and between men and women. It causes a great deal of distress, turmoil, and often termination of the relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment Styles and Jealousy Induction in Romantic Relationships
    Waking the Green-Eyed Monster: Attachment Styles and Jealousy Induction in Romantic Relationships DIANE WHITSON Although the majority of individuals involved in romantic relationships report having experienced jealousy, relatively little research has examined what factors Saint Louis University lead individuals to attempt to induce jealousy in their romantic partners. We examined how adult attachment is related to individuals’ jealousy-induction * BRENT A. MATTINGLY tendencies. Results indicated that (a) jealousy-induction was positively related to both attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance, (b) specific attachment styles Ashland University (i.e., secure, preoccupied, dismissing, fearful) were not associated with more or fewer jealousy-inducing behaviors, and (c) women tend to induce jealousy more than men. Because jealousy is negatively associated with relationship satisfaction, these findings suggest that insecurely attached individuals’ behaviors may actually be counterproductive in that they are unintentionally making their partners less happy with the relationship. any people can think of a friend or previous have paternal uncertainty (i.e., they are never guaran- romantic partner who has purposely induced teed that a woman’s child is truly their offspring), there Mjealousy in a partner. Because jealousy can is a risk that they might invest valuable resources in have negative outcomes on romantic relationships, it raising another man’s child. As such, they experience would be fruitful to understand why individuals would jealousy when their partner engages in sexual infidelity. desire to deliberately make partners jealous. However, However, women are certain of their maternal status. previous research on jealousy has focused on individuals What is more important, then, is that they obtain and who experience or express jealousy, linking it to both maintain the valued resources of the man so that their commitment and attachment style.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Orientations and Perceptions of Jealousy Evanie Eve Atencio Walden University
    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2017 Sexual Orientations and Perceptions of Jealousy Evanie Eve Atencio Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Social and Behavioral Sciences This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by Evanie Atencio has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Scott Friedman, Committee Chairperson, Psychology Faculty Dr. Michael Johnson, Committee Member, Psychology Faculty Dr. Stephen Rice, University Reviewer, Psychology Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2017 Abstract Sexual Orientations and Perceptions of Jealousy by Evanie Atencio MAED, University of Phoenix, 2007 MBA, Regis University, 2002 BS, University of Phoenix, 1998 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Clinical Psychology Walden University May 2017 Abstract This study examined the participants’ level of jealousy towards their significant other and how it affects the longevity and commitment of their respective relationships. Based on a review of the literature, the research filled the gap of explaining the factor that affects the level of jealousy in monogamous relationships, particularly gender, and sexual orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Rethinking Jealousy Experience and Expression
    Rethinking Jealousy Experience and Expression: An Examination of Specialness Meaning Framework Threat and Identification of Retroactive Jealousy Responses Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jessica Renee Frampton Graduate Program in Communication The Ohio State University 2019 Dissertation Committee Dr. Jesse Fox, Advisor Dr. Kelly Garrett Dr. Shelly Hovick Dr. Roselyn Lee-Won 1 Copyrighted by Jessica Renee Frampton 2019 2 Abstract Extant jealousy models predict jealousy is a response to perceiving a partner’s current or anticipated involvement with a rival as threatening to a relationship’s existence, relational benefits, or self-esteem (e.g., Guerrero & Andersen, 1998; White & Mullen, 1989). Those three threats may explain cases of reactive jealousy, which occurs in response to a partner’s unambiguous involvement with a current rival (Barelds & Barelds-Dijkstra, 2007; Bringle, 1991), but they likely cannot explain cases of retroactive jealousy. Retroactive jealousy entails a negative response to information about a partner’s prior romantic or sexual experiences that occurred before the primary relationship began (Frampton & Fox, 2018b). This type of jealousy is evoked even though the partner is not perceived to be currently romantically or sexually involved with ex-partners. This difference in the nature of retroactive jealousy makes it difficult for current jealousy models to predict retroactive jealousy experience and expression. Two studies were conducted to further explore retroactive jealousy experience and expression. Study 1 experimentally tested predictions about threat to a specialness meaning framework derived from the meaning maintenance model (MMM; Heine, Proulx, & Vohs, 2006; Proulx & Inzlicht, 2012) alongside of predictions about threat to the relationship’s existence, relational benefits, and self-esteem.
    [Show full text]
  • From Romantic Jealousy to Sympathetic Joy: Monogamy, Polyamory, and Beyond Jorge N
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by California Institute of Integral Studies libraries Digital Commons @ CIIS International Journal of Transpersonal Studies Advance Publication Archive 2019 From Romantic Jealousy to Sympathetic Joy: Monogamy, Polyamory, and Beyond Jorge N. Ferrer Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.ciis.edu/advance-archive Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Philosophy Commons, Religion Commons, and the Transpersonal Psychology Commons From Romantic Jealousy to Sympathetic Joy: Monogamy, Polyamory, and Beyond Jorge N. Ferrer. Cailornia Institute of Integral Studies San Francisco, CA, USA This paper explores how the extension of contemplative qualities to intimate relationships can transform human sexual/emotional responses and relationship choices. The paper reviews contemporary findings from the field of evolutionary psychology on the twin origins of jealousy and monogamy, argues for the possibility to transform jealousy into sympathetic joy (or compersion), addresses the common objections against polyamory (or nonmonogamy), and challenges the culturally prevalent belief that the only spiritually correct sexual options are either celibacy or (lifelong or serial) monogamy. To conclude, it is suggested that the cultivation of sympathetic joy in intimate bonds can pave the way to overcome the problematic dichotomy between monogamy and polyamory, grounding individuals in a radical openness to the dynamic unfolding of life
    [Show full text]
  • Jealousy: Evidence of Strong Sex Differences Using Both Forced Choice and Continuous Measure Paradigms
    Personality and Individual Differences 86 (2015) 212–216 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Personality and Individual Differences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/paid Jealousy: Evidence of strong sex differences using both forced choice and continuous measure paradigms Mons Bendixen a,⁎, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair a,DavidM.Bussb a Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway b Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA article info abstract Article history: Despite some controversy about sex differences in jealousy, data largely support that sex differences studied with Received 9 April 2015 the forced choice (FC) paradigm are robust: Men, relative to women, report greater jealousy in response to sexual Received in revised form 24 May 2015 infidelity than in response to emotional infidelity. Corresponding sex differences for continuous measures of Accepted 26 May 2015 jealousy typically have been less robust in the literature. A large sample of Norwegian students (N = 1074) ran- Available online xxxx domly responded to either FC or continuous measure questionnaires covering four infidelity scenarios. Large, Keywords: comparable, theoretically-predicted sex differences were evident for both FC and continuous measures. Relation- fi fl Jealousy ship status, in delity experiences, and question order manipulation (activation) did not consistently in uence Sex differences the sex differences for either measure, nor did individual differences in sociosexual orientation or relationship Continuous measures commitment. These large sex differences are especially noteworthy as they emerge from a highly egalitarian Forced choice nation with high paternal investment expectancy, and because they contradict social role theories that predict Sociosexuality a diminution of psychological sex differences as gender economic equality increases.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grief of Late Pregnancy Loss a Four Year Follow-Up
    The grief of late pregnancy loss A four year follow-up Joke Hunfeld The grief of late pregnancy loss A four year follow-up Rouwreacties bij laat zwangerschapsverlies. Een vervolgstudie over vier jaar. Proefschrift Tel' verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam op gezag van de rector magnificus Pro£dr P.W.C. Akkermans M.A. en volgens besluit van het college voor promoties. De open bare verdediging zal plaatsvinden op woensdag 13 september 1995 om 15.45 uur door Johanna Aurelia Maria Hunfeld geboren te Utrecht. Promotiecommissie: Promotoren: Pro£ jhr dr J.w, Wladimiroff Pro£ dr E Verhage Overige leden: Pro£ dr H.P. van Geijn Pro£ dr D. Tibboel Pro£ dr Ee. Verhulst Het onderzoek dat in dit proefschrift is beschreven kon worden uitgevoerd dankzij subsidies van Ontwikkelings Geneeskunde, het Universiteitsfonds van de Erasmus Universiteit en het Nationaal Fonds voor de Geestelijke Volksgezondhcid. CIP-gegevens KDninklijke Bibliotheek, Den Haag Hunfeld, J.A.M. The grief onate pregnancy loss / Johanna Aurelia Maria Hunfeld - Delft Eburon P & L Proefschrift Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam - met samenvatting in het Nederlands ISBN 90-5651-011-8 Nugi Trefw;: perinatal grief Distributie: Eburon P&L, Postbus 2867, 2601 CW Delft Drukwerk: Ponsen & Looijen BY, Wageningen Lay-out verzorging: A. Praamstra All rights reserved Omslagtekening © P. Picasso, 1995 do Becldrecht Amsterdam © Joke Hunfeld, 1995 Rouwreacties bij laat zwangerschapsverlics Eell vcrvolgstudie over vier jaar Contents 1 Theoretical and empirical background
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Conflict After Conception
    S Sexual Conflict After pressure would also lead to men and women fac- Conception ing different adaptive problems during a marriage. A major sex-specific conflict that can arise centers T. Joel Wade, Kelsey Salerno and James Moran around the issue of paternity certainty. Evolution- Department of Psychology ary psychologists point out that worldwide cuck- Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA, USA oldry rates range from 1.7% to 29.8% (Anderson 2006; Shackelford and Goetz 2007). Additional related conflicts such as violence, decrease in The Adaptive Function of Marital intercourse frequency, kin resemblance, the Dissatisfaction During Child–Rearing 4-year itch, and infidelity may also arise after conception. It can be argued that the dissatisfaction that occurs Research by Lucas et al. (2008) suggests some in a marriage serves an adaptive function cultural and evolutionary components to marital (Shackelford and Buss 1997). Pair-bonding satisfaction in general. This research reveals that among humans, in particular a union of marriage, there may be some universal component to effec- likely evolved to increase the reproductive bene- tive communication skills when it comes to rais- fits for both sexes (Betzig 1989; Buss and Schmitt ing an offspring, which would have been adaptive 1993). If a marriage is not maximizing the poten- in order to successfully raise a child. This theory is tial benefits and the costs that incur from the further extended by Cox et al. (1999), who found relationship outweigh the benefits, then the dissat- that those couples who had at least one partner isfaction that arises would serve to bring aware- with positive problem-solving skills prenatally ness of the issues that occur in the marriage.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Differences in Feelings of Guilt Arising from Infidelity
    Evolutionary Psychology www.epjournal.net – 2008. 6(3): 436-446 ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ Original Article Sex Differences in Feelings of Guilt Arising from Infidelity Maryanne Fisher, Department of Psychology, St. Mary’s University, Halifax, Canada. Email: [email protected] (Corresponding author) Martin Voracek, Department of Basic Psychological Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria P. Vivien Rekkas, Department of Psychology, University of Toronto (Scarborough), Toronto, Canada Anthony Cox, Centre for Psychology and Computing, Halifax, Canada Abstract: Although there is extensive literature regarding sex differences in jealousy due to infidelity, guilt resulting from infidelity remains unexplored. We hypothesize that men will feel guiltier from imagined emotional rather than sexual infidelity, as it is most important for their partner’s reproductive success. Similarly, we predict that women will feel more guilt from imagined sexual rather than emotional infidelity. The findings indicate a different pattern; men feel guiltier following sexual infidelity, whereas women feel guiltier following emotional infidelity. Results also show that both sexes believe their partners would have a more difficult time forgiving sexual, rather than emotional, infidelity, but women and not men report that sexual infidelity would more likely lead to relationship dissolution. These findings are discussed in view of evolved mating strategies and individual reproductive success. Keywords: infidelity, sex differences, guilt, mate selection. ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ Introduction Infidelity in romantic relationships is far from rare; recent national surveys of Americans have documented that between approximately 20 to 25% of respondents report at least one sexual affair during their lifetime (Atkins, Baucom, and Jacobson, 2001; Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, and Michaels, 1994). All infidelity is not the same, however, as women and men apparently do not perceive their affairs in an equivalent manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Running Head: COMMUNICATION in POLYAMOROUS RELATIONSHIPS 1
    Running head: COMMUNICATION IN POLYAMOROUS RELATIONSHIPS 1 How Communication is Used in Polyamorous Relationships Meghan Wallace A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Counselling City University of Seattle 2019 APPROVED BY Colin James Sanders, MA, RCC, PhD, Advisor, Counselling Psychology Faculty Christopher Kinman, MA, RCC, PhD (Candidate), Faculty Reader, Counselling Psychology Faculty Division of Arts and Sciences COMMUNICATION IN POLYAMOROUS RELATIONSHIPS 2 A Phenomenological Study of the Use of Communication to Maintain a Polyamorous Relationship Meghan Wallace City University of Seattle COMMUNICATION IN POLYAMOROUS RELATIONSHIPS 3 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................. 3 Abstract................................................................................................................................ 4 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 5 Chapter One: Introduction .................................................................................................. 6 Nature of the Study .......................................................................................................................7 Scholarly Context .........................................................................................................................8 Definitions .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Specific Innate Modular View of Jealousy Reconsidered
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Copyright 2000 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 2000, Vol. 78, No. 6, 1082-1091 OO22-3514/OO/S5.OO DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.6.1082 Psychophysiological Responses to Imagined Infidelity: The Specific Innate Modular View of Jealousy Reconsidered Christine R. Harris University of California, San Diego Three studies measured psychophysiological reactivity (heart rate, blood pressure, and electrodermal activity) while participants imagined a mate's infidelity. The specific innate modular theory of gender differences in jealousy hypothesizes that men are upset by sexual infidelity and women are upset by emotional infidelity, because of having faced different adaptive challenges (cuckoldry and loss of a mate's resources, respectively). This view was not supported. In men, sexual-infidelity imagery elicited greater reactivity than emotional-infidelity imagery. But, sexual imagery elicited greater reactivity even when infidelity was not involved, suggesting that the differential reactivity may not specifically index greater jealousy. In two studies with reasonable power, women did not respond more strongly to emotional infidelity. Moreover, women with committed sexual relationship experience showed reactivity patterns similar to those of men. Hypothetical infidelity self-reports were unrelated to reactivity. Several evolutionary psychologists have proposed a theory of This view of jealousy as a sexually dimorphic adaptation is gender differences in jealousy, which claims that men and women widely discussed in current editions of social psychology text- are innately predisposed to react differently to sexual versus emo- books and has received a great deal of attention in publications tional infidelity (Buss, Larsen, Westen, & Semmelroth, 1992; Daly written for the general public.
    [Show full text]