DOCSLIB.ORG

Development and Calibration of Central Pressure Filling Rate Models for Hurricane Simulation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development and Calibration of Central Pressure Filling Rate Models for Hurricane Simulation DEVELOPMENT AND CALIBRATION OF CENTRAL PRESSURE FILLING RATE MODELS FOR HURRICANE SIMULATION A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Civil Engineering by Fangqian Liu May 2012 Accepted by: WeiChiang Pang, Committee Chair Scott Schiff Bryant Nielson ABSTRACT This study presents the development of a new central pressure filling rate model to characterize the rate at which hurricanes or tropical storms decay after landfall. It has been shown that the post landfall decay rate of hurricanes is closely related to the time after landfall, the size of hurricane and proximity of the hurricane eye to the coastline. In addition, it has been observed that the decay rates of hurricanes are geographically dependent. Based on these observations, a set of simple empirical models expressed in terms of exponential and linear equations are utilized to characterize the decay rate of hurricanes after landfall. The filling rate model, which consists of a set of empirical equations, is organized according to the geographic region, the storm heading direction and proximity of the hurricane eye to the coastline. To account for the influence of the land terrain on the decay rate of hurricanes, the North American continent is divided into seven regions: Gulf Coast, Florida, East Coast and Northeast Coast, Great Lakes, Inland and Mexico area. A new along-shore hurricane decay model is introduced to account for the decay rate of hurricanes traveling along the coastline and with the hurricane eye relatively close to the coastline. In the new filling rate model, modeling parameters are determined through regression analysis using the hurricane database (HURDAT) maintained by the National Hurricane Center for hurricane records from 1975 to 2011 (HRD 2012a). Based on the results of the regression analysis, it has been shown that the modeling uncertainty (or error term), which is defined as the difference between the model predicted and the ii actual observed decay rates, can be characterized using the unbounded Johnson distribution. The new model is benchmarked against two current state-of-the-art models by comparing the simulated central pressures for historical hurricane events to that of the actual observations in HURDAT. The benchmark study has shown that the simulated results using the new decay model are generally more accurate and match reasonably well with the actual central pressures of historical storm events. The new decay model has been coded into a Matlab program and the codes are provided herein with this manuscript. The new decay model and the computer codes can be implemented into a stochastic hurricane simulation framework for long-term hurricane risk assessment or hurricane hazard mapping. iii DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this study to my parents, Mr. Honglin Liu and Mrs. Fang Sun. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to attribute my accomplishment of this study to my advisor Dr. Weichiang Pang for his instructions, patience and professional spirit that encourage me to be a graduate student. Also, I appreciate the help from my committee members Dr. Scott Schiff and Dr. Bryant Nielson, not only for their work on this thesis but also for everything they did in research and coursework through my two and half year in Clemson University. Since the great patience and care that they have given to Chinese students like me, it did not take long for me to conquer the first few of months in U.S. and start the regular graduate student life. I would like to thank my dear friends and colleagues Masood Hassanzadeh, Michael Grayson Bin Pei and Mengyu Yang for their helps on my research and courses. The communications among us keep encourage me to bravely face the difficulties in my studies. Finally, I would like to present special thanks to Dr. Hui Wu from Beijing Institute of Architecture and Civil Engineering who encouraged me to study in U.S, for his trust and devotion on his students. v SPONSOR This manuscript was prepared in part as a result of work sponsored by the S.C. Sea Grant Consortium with NOAA financial assistance award NA10OAR4170073. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the South Carolina Sea Grant Consortium, or NOAA. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TITLE PAGE .................................................................................................................... i ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... ii DEDICATION ................................................................................................................ iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... x CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 II. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................... 4 Hurricane Characteristics ......................................................................... 4 Stochastic Hurricane Model ..................................................................... 9 Previous Studies of Central Pressure Deficit Decay Models ........................................................................ 21 III. MODEL FORMULATION ......................................................................... 28 Model Outline ........................................................................................ 29 Division of Coastal and Inland Regions ................................................ 30 Landfalling Model for Gulf Coast, East Coast, Northeast Coast and Mexico .............................................................. 31 Least-square Fitting of Filling Rate for Each Storm (ai) ....................... 33 Least-square Fitting of Regional Decay Rate (ao) ................................. 36 Filling Rate Modeling Error................................................................... 42 Parameters Estimation for Johnson System Distribution .............................................................. 47 Exiting Model ........................................................................................ 49 Florida Model......................................................................................... 56 Along-shore Model ................................................................................ 60 Inland Model .......................................................................................... 64 Great Lakes Model ................................................................................. 69 vii Table of Contents (Continued) Page Summary of New Filling Rate Model ................................................... 72 IV. MODEL BENCHMARKING ...................................................................... 75 Pc Errors of Coastal Regions .................................................................. 77 Pc Errors of Inland and Great Lakes Regions ........................................ 89 Pc Errors of Along-shore and Exiting Storms ........................................ 94 Summary of Model Benchmark Results ................................................ 99 V. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................... 102 Summary and Conclusion .................................................................... 102 Recommendations for Future Work..................................................... 103 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................. 104 A: Flow-chart of application procedure for multi-region and scenario Pc decay model ....................................... 105 B: Storms landfall information used in derivation of regions and scenarios models ...................................................... 106 C: Hurricane central pressure simulation Matlab code ........................ 115 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................ 126 viii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Saffir-Simpson hurricane scale. ..................................................................... 5 2 Parameters for event-based hurricane model (Huang et al. 2001). ............................................................................... 13 3 Decay constant a and regression parameters (Vickery 2005). ...................................................................................... 27 4 Summary of current central pressure deficit decay models. ........................ 28 5 Outline of the new hurricane central pressure deficit decay model...................................................................................................... 29 6 Classification of decay model. ..................................................................... 72 7 Formulation and filling rate parameters of new decay models. ................................................................................................... 73 8 Distribution parameters for decay rate error. ............................................... 74 9 Summary of central pressure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GAO-08-1120 Disaster Recovery: Past Experiences Offer Insights For
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Committee on Homeland GAO Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate September 2008 DISASTER RECOVERY Past Experiences Offer Insights for Recovering from Hurricanes Ike and Gustav and Other Recent Natural Disasters GAO-08-1120 September 2008 DISASTER RECOVERY Accountability Integrity Reliability Past Experiences Offer Insights for Recovering from Highlights Hurricanes Ike and Gustav and Other Recent Natural Highlights of GAO-08-1120, a report to the Disasters Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found This month, Hurricanes Ike and While the federal government provides significant financial assistance after Gustav struck the Gulf Coast major disasters, state and local governments play the lead role in disaster producing widespread damage and recovery. As affected jurisdictions recover from the recent hurricanes and leading to federal major disaster floods, experiences from past disasters can provide insights into potential declarations. Earlier this year, good practices. Drawing on experiences from six major disasters that heavy flooding resulted in similar declarations in seven Midwest occurred from 1989 to 2005, GAO identified the following selected insights: states. In response, federal agencies have provided millions of • Create a clear, implementable, and timely recovery plan. Effective dollars in assistance to help with recovery plans provide a road map for recovery. For example, within short- and long-term recovery. 6 months of the 1995 earthquake in Japan, the city of Kobe created a State and local governments bear recovery plan that identified detailed goals which facilitated coordination the primary responsibility for among recovery stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • An Informed System Development Approach to Tropical Cyclone Track and Intensity Forecasting
    Linköping Studies in Science and Technology Dissertations. No. 1734 An Informed System Development Approach to Tropical Cyclone Track and Intensity Forecasting by Chandan Roy Department of Computer and Information Science Linköping University SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden Linköping 2016 Cover image: Hurricane Isabel (2003), NASA, image in public domain. Copyright © 2016 Chandan Roy ISBN: 978-91-7685-854-7 ISSN 0345-7524 Printed by LiU Tryck, Linköping 2015 URL: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-123198 ii Abstract Introduction: Tropical Cyclones (TCs) inflict considerable damage to life and property every year. A major problem is that residents often hesitate to follow evacuation orders when the early warning messages are perceived as inaccurate or uninformative. The root problem is that providing accurate early forecasts can be difficult, especially in countries with less economic and technical means. Aim: The aim of the thesis is to investigate how cyclone early warning systems can be technically improved. This means, first, identifying problems associated with the current cyclone early warning systems, and second, investigating if biologically based Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are feasible to solve some of the identified problems. Method: First, for evaluating the efficiency of cyclone early warning systems, Bangladesh was selected as study area, where a questionnaire survey and an in-depth interview were administered. Second, a review of currently operational TC track forecasting techniques was conducted to gain a better understanding of various techniques’ prediction performance, data requirements, and computational resource requirements. Third, a technique using biologically based ANNs was developed to produce TC track and intensity forecasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane and Tropical Storm
    State of New Jersey 2014 Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 5. Risk Assessment 5.8 Hurricane and Tropical Storm 2014 Plan Update Changes The 2014 Plan Update includes tropical storms, hurricanes and storm surge in this hazard profile. In the 2011 HMP, storm surge was included in the flood hazard. The hazard profile has been significantly enhanced to include a detailed hazard description, location, extent, previous occurrences, probability of future occurrence, severity, warning time and secondary impacts. New and updated data and figures from ONJSC are incorporated. New and updated figures from other federal and state agencies are incorporated. Potential change in climate and its impacts on the flood hazard are discussed. The vulnerability assessment now directly follows the hazard profile. An exposure analysis of the population, general building stock, State-owned and leased buildings, critical facilities and infrastructure was conducted using best available SLOSH and storm surge data. Environmental impacts is a new subsection. 5.8.1 Profile Hazard Description A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] 2013a). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development.
    [Show full text]
  • US Energy Industry Response to Recent Hurricane Seasons
    Hardening and Resiliency U.S. Energy Industry Response to Recent Hurricane Seasons Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy August 2010 For Further Information This report was prepared by the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability under the direction of Patricia Hoffman, Assistant Secretary, and William Bryan, Deputy Assistant Secretary. Specific questions about information in this report may be directed to Alice Lippert, Senior Technical Advisor ([email protected]). Contributors include Mindi Farber-DeAnda, Matthew Cleaver, Carleen Lewandowski, and Kateri Young. Cover photo sources: Lineman photo: David H. Lewis/istockphoto.com Pipeline photo: Christian Lagereek/istockphoto.com Refinery photo: Erik de Graaf/istockphoto.com Mobile transformer photo: Deltastar, reproduced with permission. OE/ISER Final Report 8/16/10 i Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ v Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Focus of the Study .......................................................................................................................... 3 Aging Infrastructure and Hurricane Hazards .............................................................................. 5 Storm Surge and Flood Damage ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned: Evacuations Management of Hurricane Gustav
    4th Symposium on Policy and Socio-Economic Research, American Meteorological Society, Phoenix, AZ, 2009. 2.5 LESSONS LEARNED: EVACUATIONS MANAGEMENT OF HURRICANE GUSTAV Gina M. Eosco1, Mark A. Shafer2, and Barry Keim3 1Department of Communications, University of Oklahoma 2Oklahoma Climatological Survey, University of Oklahoma 3 Department of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University Experience is what you get when you don’t get what you want. The experience of Hurricane Katrina was not what anyone in New Orleans wanted, yet three years after New Orleans was struck by Hurricane Katrina, the city proved they were ready for the next big one. As the National Hurricane Center forecasts started indicating a possible category 3 or stronger hurricane heading towards Louisiana, the city began preparations for evacuation. Gulf coast residents responded with the largest evacuation in U.S. history. Given the contrast with Katrina, why was the response to Gustav so much better? It is true that government officials learned from Katrina, but Katrina was just one milestone along the way toward making New Orleans safer. This paper examines prior recent experience with hurricanes in Louisiana, events surrounding Hurricane Gustav, and Figure 1. Track of Hurricane Georges, September how we have learned from other disasters. Not only 20-27, 1998 (Image source: Unisys did Louisiana officials learn from prior hurricanes, http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/). but those far-removed from the area of impact learned from their own disaster experiences to hurricane Georges was uncoordinated and chaotic. manage the influx of evacuees. The progression of Each parish had its own separate response plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Disaster Assistance After Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma, Gustav, and Ike
    Federal Disaster Assistance After Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma, Gustav, and Ike Updated February 26, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R43139 Federal Disaster Assistance After Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma, Gustav, and Ike Summary This report provides information on federal financial assistance provided to the Gulf States after major disasters were declared in Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in response to the widespread destruction that resulted from Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma in 2005 and Hurricanes Gustav and Ike in 2008. Though the storms happened over a decade ago, Congress has remained interested in the types and amounts of federal assistance that were provided to the Gulf Coast for several reasons. This includes how the money has been spent, what resources have been provided to the region, and whether the money has reached the intended people and entities. The financial information is also useful for congressional oversight of the federal programs provided in response to the storms. It gives Congress a general idea of the federal assets that are needed and can be brought to bear when catastrophic disasters take place in the United States. Finally, the financial information from the storms can help frame the congressional debate concerning federal assistance for current and future disasters. The financial information for the 2005 and 2008 Gulf Coast storms is provided in two sections of this report: 1. Table 1 of Section I summarizes disaster assistance supplemental appropriations enacted into public law primarily for the needs associated with the five hurricanes, with the information categorized by federal department and agency; and 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane & Tropical Storm
    5.8 HURRICANE & TROPICAL STORM SECTION 5.8 HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM 5.8.1 HAZARD DESCRIPTION A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (NOAA, 2013). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. The average wind speeds for tropical storms and hurricanes are listed below: . A tropical depression has a maximum sustained wind speeds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less . A tropical storm has maximum sustained wind speeds of 39 to 73 mph . A hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or higher. In the western North Pacific, hurricanes are called typhoons; similar storms in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean are called cyclones. A major hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 111 mph or higher (NOAA, 2013). Over a two-year period, the United States coastline is struck by an average of three hurricanes, one of which is classified as a major hurricane. Hurricanes, tropical storms, and tropical depressions may pose a threat to life and property. These storms bring heavy rain, storm surge and flooding (NOAA, 2013). The cooler waters off the coast of New Jersey can serve to diminish the energy of storms that have traveled up the eastern seaboard.
    [Show full text]
  • National Weather Service Southeast River Forecast Center
    National Weather Service Southeast River Forecast Center Critical Issue: Tropical Season Review 2008 Impact on Southeast U.S. Water Resources Issued: December 18, 2008 Summary: • A normal number of inland-moving tropical systems impacted the region. • T.S. Fay brought record rain and floods to parts of Florida. • Tropical rainfall resulted in significant hydrologic recharge over much of Florida, Alabama, southern Georgia, and central sections of North and South Carolina. • Some severely drought-impacted areas, including North Georgia, western North and South Carolina, and west central Florida, near Tampa, saw limited or no significant hydrologic recharge this season. 1 Southeast River Forecast Center There are several distinct times of the year when “typical” rainfall patterns provide an opportunity for the recharge of key water resources. The primary climatologically-based recharge period (with the exception of the Florida peninsula) is the winter and early spring months. Secondary periods include the tropical season and a small secondary window of severe weather in the fall. Tropical season, from June 1st through November 30th, is potentially a time for soil and reservoir recharge. Most tropical systems arrive in the late summer and early fall, which otherwise tends to be a relatively dry time of the year. Recharge from tropical systems can be “hit or miss.” While some areas may receive extensive rainfall, other nearby areas can remain completely dry. Rainfall will also vary between tropical seasons. Some seasons have been extremely wet (2004 and 2005), while other seasons had little if any tropical activity moving across the Southeast U.S. (2006 and 2007). This reduction of inland-moving tropical activity in 2006 and 2007 aggravated overall drought conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of 2002 Atlantic Tropical Cyclone Activity And
    SUMMARY OF 2002 ATLANTIC TROPICAL CYCLONE ACTIVITY AND VERIFICATION OF AUTHORS' SEASONAL ACTIVITY FORECAST An Early Summer Successful Forecast of an Inactive Hurricane Season - But the Many Weak, Higher Latitude Tropical Storms That Formed Were Not Anticipated (as of 21 November 2002) By William M. Gray1, Christopher W. Landsea,2 and Philip Klotzbach3 with advice and assistance from William Thorson4 and Jason Connor5 [This verification as well as past forecasts and verifications are available via the World Wide Web: http://typhoon.atmos.colostate.edu/forecasts/] Brad Bohlander or Thomas Milligan, Colorado State University Media Representatives (970-491-6432) are available to answer questions about this verification. Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 Phone Number: 970-491-8681 2002 ATLANTIC BASIN SEASONAL HURRICANE FORECAST Tropical Cyclone Parameters Updated Updated Updated Updated Observed and 1950-2000 Climatology 7 Dec 5 April 2002 31 May 2002 7 Aug 2002 2 Sep 2002 (in parentheses) 2001 Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Totals Named Storms (NS) (9.6) 13 12 11 9 8 12 Named Storm Days (NSD) (49.1) 70 65 55 35 25 54 Hurricanes (H)(5.9) 8 7 6 4 3 4 Hurricane Days (HD)(24.5) 35 30 25 12 10 11 Intense Hurricanes (IH) (2.3) 4 3 2 1 1 2 Intense Hurricane Days (IHD)(5.0) 7 6 5 2 2 2.5 Hurricane Destruction Potential (HDP) (72.7) 90 85 75 35 25 31 Net Tropical Cyclone Activity (NTC)(100%) 140 125 100 60 45 80 VERIFICATION OF 2002 MAJOR HURRICANE LANDFALL FORECAST 7 Dec 5 Apr 31 May 7 Aug Fcst.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Kyle (AL11008) 25-29 September 2008
    Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Kyle (AL11008) 25-29 September 2008 Lixion A. Avila National Hurricane Center 5 December 2008 Kyle was a category one hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale that made landfall in southwestern Nova Scotia. a. Synoptic History The development of Kyle was associated with a tropical wave that moved off the coast of Africa with some convective organization on 12 September. There was a weak low pressure area associated with the wave and the system moved westward and west-southwestward for a few days. As the tropical wave was approaching the Lesser Antilles, it began to interact with a strong upper-level trough over the eastern Caribbean Sea, resulting in an increase in cloudiness and thunderstorms. The surface area of low pressure became better defined as it crossed the Windward Islands and began to develop a larger surface circulation on 19 September. The low pressure area turned toward the northwest and became separated from the wave, which continued its westward track across the Caribbean Sea. The upper-level trough moved westward and weakened, causing small relaxation of westerly shear and allowing the convection associated with the low to become a little more concentrated. The low was near Puerto Rico on 21 September, and continued drifting northwestward. It then spent two days crossing Hispaniola, producing disorganized thunderstorms and a large area of squalls within a convective band over the adjacent Caribbean Sea. During this period, the system lacked a well-defined circulation center as indicated by reconnaissance and local surface data. The low moved northeastward away from Hispaniola, and finally developed a well- defined surface circulation center.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Aspects of Hurricanes for Technology Faculty in the United States
    Basic aspects of hurricanes for technology faculty in the United States Dr. John Patterson1 Dr. George Ford2 Abstract- As predicted by Svante Arrhenius in 1896, global warming is taking place as evidenced by documented rises in average sea level of about 1.7 millimeters per year during the 20th Century. There have been naturally occurring cycles of global warming and cooling throughout the history of the world. Much has been written about the catastrophe that global warming would present to humankind such as an increase in the frequency and severity of hurricanes. This paper presents a discussion of the formation of hurricanes, hurricane season, hurricane ratings, and hurricane prediction and tracking for engineering technology and construction management faculty to use to supplement instruction in courses taught which are not in the environmental or energy related subjects. Keywords: global warming, hurricane aspects, hurricane characteristics, hurricane fomations INTRODUCTION Global warming due to human activity was first predicted by Svante Arrhenius in 1896 (NASA, 2007). The primary gases in the atmosphere, nitrogen and oxygen, will not reflect solar radiation, but many gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and halogens will trap infrared radiation emitted by the Earth’s surface into the atmosphere causing global warming and climatic change. Atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide have been measured accurately since the late 1970s (Tans, 2007). Historical levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide and climatic change over the last 400,000 years have been estimated from Antarctica ice core records. Antarctic temperatures have varied from about -18 to 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit relative to present day levels (Thorpe, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2008*
    MAY 2010 A N N U A L S U M M A R Y 1975 ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2008* DANIEL P. BROWN,JOHN L. BEVEN,JAMES L. FRANKLIN, AND ERIC S. BLAKE NOAA/NWS/NCEP, National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 27 July 2009, in final form 17 September 2009) ABSTRACT The 2008 Atlantic hurricane season is summarized and the year’s tropical cyclones are described. Sixteen named storms formed in 2008. Of these, eight became hurricanes with five of them strengthening into major hurricanes (category 3 or higher on the Saffir–Simpson hurricane scale). There was also one tropical de- pression that did not attain tropical storm strength. These totals are above the long-term means of 11 named storms, 6 hurricanes, and 2 major hurricanes. The 2008 Atlantic basin tropical cyclones produced significant impacts from the Greater Antilles to the Turks and Caicos Islands as well as along portions of the U.S. Gulf Coast. Hurricanes Gustav, Ike, and Paloma hit Cuba, as did Tropical Storm Fay. Haiti was hit by Gustav and adversely affected by heavy rains from Fay, Ike, and Hanna. Paloma struck the Cayman Islands as a major hurricane, while Omar was a major hurricane when it passed near the northern Leeward Islands. Six con- secutive cyclones hit the United States, including Hurricanes Dolly, Gustav, and Ike. The death toll from the Atlantic tropical cyclones is approximately 750. A verification of National Hurricane Center official forecasts during 2008 is also presented. Official track forecasts set records for accuracy at all lead times from 12 to 120 h, and forecast skill was also at record levels for all lead times.
    [Show full text]