<<

Holocene faulting in the western ,

PETER W. HUNTOON Department of Geology and Water Resources Research Institute, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071

ABSTRACT pre-1964 literature on events associated with the entire zone of and Arizona appears in Averitt (1964). The The Toroweap and Hurricane faults and a subsidiary fault in the findings of these workers and others substantiate that the southern western Grand Canyon exhibit evidence of Holocene movement. was experiencing compressional stress through- This evidence includes scarps in alluvium and sediments ponded out the Laramide orogeny, during which folds, usually east-dipping against a fault on the downthrown block. These displacements are monoclines, were formed (Huntoon, 1974). By Miocene time the the latest in a well-exposed record of recurrent movements along region was under tension, and a system of high-angle normal faults the major faults in the region. developed, many along the trends of the earlier Laramide folds. The tensional environment has persisted to the present. Reverse drag, INTRODUCTION defined as downfolding along the downthrown side of a fault an- tithetic to the displacement, developed along many of the faults in In this paper I document newly discovered examples of Holocene the region contemporaneously with Cenozoic movements faulting in the western Grand Canyon and place this faulting in (Hamblin, 1965). perspective as part of the record of recurrent movements along the major faults in the area. RECENT FAULTING The arid climate, topographic relief, and presence of successive lava flows and young alluvial sediments in the western Grand Can- A detailed examination of the literature and field work convinces yon combine to offer classic exposures in which recurrent move- me that our ability to distinguish additional Cenozoic movements ments along several of the major faults can be readily documented along faults such as the Hurricane or Toroweap is limited only by (see Fig. 1). A partial record of recurrent movements along the To- the existing number of successively young lava flows and other dat- roweap and Hurricane faults in and immediately adjacent to the able strata that cross the faults. It is clear, as stated by Hamblin Grand Canyon now exists through the efforts of Dutton (1882), (1974, p. 169), that movement along these faults has been relatively Davis (1903), Huntington and Goldthwait (1903), Gardner (1941), continuous, at least from Miocene to Holocene time. McKee and Schenk (1942), Koons (1945), Kurie (1966), Hamblin William Morris Davis (1903, p. 20) made the startling discovery (1970a), Young (1970), and Lovejoy (1973). A summary of the that there were at least 6 m of Holocene movement along the To- roweap fault that resulted in displacement of alluvium in Prospect Valley immediately south of the (Fig. 2). Such a fresh scarp was most unusual for the region, and 1 am not aware of a discovery of such a feature in the southwestern part of the Col- orado Plateau previous to Davis's work. Although no one would deny the existence of Holocene faulting in the southwestern part of the Colorado Plateau, evidence to document such features is

0 5 10 Kilometers E3HE5CE5 I Figure 2. Holocene fault scarp in alluvium and lava along Toroweap Figure 1, Location of the faults described. Shaded parts of fault traces fault in Prospect Valley. Notice that lava flow to right of cone is displaced are those that exhibit evidence of Holocene movement. more than alluvium to left of cone. View is toward southeast.

Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 88, p. 1619-1622, 4 figs., November 1977, Doc. no. 71108.

1619

Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/88/11/1619/3429262/i0016-7606-88-11-1619.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 1620 P. W. HUNTOON

difficult to establish. This is primarily because rocks younger than Mesozoic in age are largely stripped from the area. For example, the youngest rocks composing the land surface in the vicinity of the eastern Grand Canyon are Permian limestones. Koons (1945, p. 160) observed that the same scarp recorded by Davis was present on the eastern side of Vulcan's Throne, a small volcano situated on the Toroweap fault on the north edge of the gorge of the Colorado River. Hamblin (1970a, p. 12) identified a Holocene 15-m scarp in lava rocks along the Hurricane fault a few kilometres north of the Colorado River. Koons (1964, p. 104, 106, 107) documented Holocene faulting along major faults on the Indian Reservation within 50 km of the Colorado River and east of the Hurricane fault. His observations were of faults that have not been proven to be as recent as those observed by Davis or Hamblin, but they do displace Quaternary lavas and gravels. Av- eritt (1964) summarized data from Townley and Allen (1939), Heck (1947), and the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey (1928- Figure 3. Holocene fault scarps in alluvium along Hurricane fault south 1951), in which are listed 15 minor tremors attributable to move- of the mouth of Whitmore Wash. Notice adjustment of stream channel in ment along the Hurricane fault between 1881 and 1951. Sturgul lower right corner. Inner gorge of Colorado River at top. View is toward and Irwin (1971) updated earthquake data for the region through the east. 1966. Field mapping conducted by myself, George Billingsley, and James Sears led to the discovery of additional evidence for HURRICANE FAULT Holocene faulting along several kilometres of the Toroweap fault, the Hurricane fault, and a subsidiary fault west of the Hurricane The Hurricane fault is a high-angle normal fault that marks the fault. In the cases of the Hurricane and Toroweap faults, we have boundary between the Colorado Plateau and Basin and Range located 1.5- to 6-m scarps in alluvium which are becoming partially provinces in Utah; however, the Grand Wash fault is defined as the eroded and rounded. The recency of faulting along the subsidiary province boundary 55 km to the west of Hurricane fault in the fault is revealed by locally ponded sediments on the downthrown western Grand Canyon region of Arizona. The strike of the Hur- block, which are now partially dissected by a small drainage ricane fault in the vicinity of the Grand Canyon is sinuous but channel. maintains a northerly regional trend. The west side is displaced down, and the fault is characterized by reverse drag north of the TOROWEAP FAULT Colorado River. The 10-km-wide block of Paleozoic rocks that separates the Hurricane and Toroweap faults in the Grand Canyon The Toroweap fault is an extensive, north-trending, high-angle is broken by numerous high-angle normal faults that trend predom- normal fault that has displaced the Paleozoic rocks along the Col- inantly toward the northwest. orado River down to the west a total of 193 m (McKee and Schenk, Rocks younger than Paleozoic are virtually missing along the 1942, p. 262). A 1.2 ± 0.6-m.y.-old lava flow (Damon, 1965, p. Hurricane fault in the Grand Canyon south of Whitmore Wash. 42) that occurs near river level has been displaced 44.5 m by the However, the mouth of Whitmore Wash provides classic exposures fault. Older lava flows that fill Prospect Valley have been displaced in which are recorded evidence for at least three periods of recur- 46 m 2.5 km south of the river (Hamblin, 1970a, p. 17). North of rent movement. The Paleozoic section is displaced on the order of Volcan's Throne, Koons (1945, p. 160) described various flows 300 m by the fault at this site. Basalt flows that fill an old course of that are displaced between 11 and 46 m along the fault. These flows Whitmore Wash to a depth of about 300 m are displaced 23 m by are classified by Koons as stage Ilia and were reclassified by the fault. These lavas are similar to the older basalts that fill To- Hamblin (1970b) as stage IV. Koons (1945, p. 160) correlated the roweap Valley and are no younger than early stage III flows flows with others in the vicinity that have been dated in the (Hamblin, 1974, p. 156). Stage IV flows that crossed the fault and 25,000-to 30,000—yrB.P. range (McKee and others, 1967, p. 44). cascaded into Whitmore Wash are displaced about 15 m, a rela- The fresh scarp in the alluvium of Prospect Valley described by tionship cited by Hamblin (1970a, p. 12). This scarp is Holocene in Davis (1903) can be traced about 5.5 km to the south of the Col- age. orado River. As shown in Figure 2, both alluvium and a cinder cone During the course of this investigation, an apparently younger and associated flow are displaced along the scarp. The cinder cone Holocene scarp, coincident with Hamblin's and which alternately lies 4 km south of the Colorado River and is in the stage IV group displaced lavas and alluvium, was traced 14 km northward along of Hamblin (1970b), which suggests a date of eruption that is Whitmore Wash from the Colorado River. The scarp is less than probably more recent than 30,000 yr B.P. The alluvium is offset 4.5 m high and is rounded by erosion. North of the mouth of about 6 m in the vicinity of the cone; however, the lava from the Whitmore Wash, the scarp is a single break that occurs at eleva- cone is displaced below the surface on the downthrown western tions between 800 and 1,300 m. As shown in Figure 3, a short block, which requires a vertical throw of at least 15 m. The rela- 0.8-km segment south of Whitmore Wash crops out at an elevation tionships at the cone therefore demonstrate that there have been at of only 730 m, just 240 m above the Colorado River, and consists least two recurrent movements along the fault in Holocene time, of two closely spaced breaks that parallel each other within 30 m. the younger probably within the last few centuries. To date, I have been unable to find traces of this scarp southward The scarp in the alluvium of Prospect Valley dies out toward the along the Colorado River, and I suspect that all evidence of the south, indicating a combination of diminished throw and oblitera- movement has been eroded. E. Shoemaker (1975, oral commun.) tion of the scarp by erosion. Holocene faulting along the Toroweap advised that direct evidence of it was missing north of Whitmore fault is known to be discontinuous in the area, because Koons Wash, but evidence for Holocene deformation in the form of (1945, p. 160) described stage 111b (Holocene) flows 32 km north of ponded sediments exists immediately to the north of the area exam- the Colorado River that have not been faulted. ined here.

Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/88/11/1619/3429262/i0016-7606-88-11-1619.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 HOLOCENE FAULTING IN THE WESTERN GRAND CANYON 1621

Figure 4. Stereopair showing the ponded sedi- ments along west side of the subsidiary fault. Ponded sediments are light colored and partially dissected.

SUBSIDIARY FAULT post-Paleozoic on the basis of observed field relationships. The in- formation gained in the western Grand Canyon can be justifiably The subsidiary fault lies 18 km west of the Hurricane fault at the extrapolated eastward because of regional similarities between the mouth of Whitmore Wash and is a minor element in a complex sys- fault zones, such as trends, attitudes of fault planes, and sense of tem of generally northwest-trending faults in the Andrus Canyon throw. It has been necessary for me to liberally apply ages deter- area which are structurally related to the Hurricane fault zone. The mined for western Grand Canyon structures to similar faults in the subsidiary fault is 6.5 km long and trends northward. It is exposed eastern Grand Canyon, and I feel that this is sound (Huntoon, in the Permian of McKee (1975), which is a 1974). resistant cliff-former. The fault is high angle and normal, and it The record from the western Grand Canyon demonstrates that displaces the western block down a few metres. This minor fault is extensive normal faulting in the entire Grand Canyon region has interesting, because a small deposit of clastic sediments are ponded occurred at least since Miocene time and continues to the present. in the depression adjacent to the fault plane on the downthrown This has important geomorphic ramifications, because models de- block. As shown in Figure 4, these sediments now occupy an area scribing landform evolution in the region must also account for of less than 0.5 km2 and are actively being eroded by intermittent simultaneous evolution of the structures, a fact recognized by Luc- runoff in a small tributary that discharges into Andrus Canyon. chitta (1975). The recency of the faulting is shown by the accumulation of ponded sediments, which were locally derived, on the present erosion sur- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS face. To date, fossils have not been found in these sediments. George H. Billingsley, Jr., and James W. Sears collaborated with INTERPRETATION me in the field mapping that resulted in these findings. Funds for the project were generously provided by the Office of Water Research Although a few thousand kilometres of faults, both major and and Technology (matching grant agreement 14-34-0001-6134) and minor, have been traced in the Grand Canyon, less than 30 km are the Grand Canyon Natural History Association. The Wyoming known to show evidence of Holocene movement. I suspect that Water Resources Research Institute and Department of Geology, many of the faults associated with the known active faults in the University of Wyoming, jointly sponsored the preparation of the region, including the Hurricane and Toroweap, have experienced manuscript. Holocene movements. The lack of evidence for this faulting results because (1) the records of it are extremely delicate and quickly re- REFERENCES CITED moved by erosion and (2) the magnitude of Holocene displace- ments along subsidiary faults is so small that they cannot be iden- Averitt, P., 1964, Table of post-Cretaceous geologic events along the Hur- tified. What is required are new outpourings of lava to provide a ricane fault near Cedar City, Iron County, Utah: Geol. Soc. America time line for the future. Bull., v. 75, p. 901-908. The western Grand Canyon, with its record of recurrent move- Damon, P. E., 1965, Correlation and chronology of ore deposits and vol- canic rocks: Arizona Univ. Geochron. Labs. Ann. Prog. Rept. C00- ments along faults, provides significant insight into the tectonics of 689-50, 157 p. the southwestern Colorado Plateau. This is because the youngest Davis, W. M., 1903, An excursion to the plateau province of Utah and rocks, exposed over vast adjacent areas of the plateau, including 2 Arizona: Harvard Coll. Mus. Comp. Zoology Bull., v. 42, p. 1-50. the entire 6,500 km of the eastern Grand Canyon, are Paleozoic in Dutton, C. E., 1882, Tertiary history of the Grand Canyon district: U.S. age. The structures that deform these rocks can be classified only as Geol. Survey Mon. 2, 264 p.

Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/88/11/1619/3429262/i0016-7606-88-11-1619.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 1622 P. W. HUNTOON

Gardner, L. S., 1941, The Hurricane fault in southwestern Utah and north- margin near Zion National Park, Utah: Geol. Soc. America Bull., western Arizona: Am. Jour. Sci., v. 239, p. 241-260. v. 77, p. 867-872. Hamblin, W. K., 1965, Origin of reverse drag on the downthrown side of Lovejoy, E. M., 1973, Major early Cenozoic deformation along Hurricane normal faults: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 76, p. 1145-1163. fault zone, Utah and Arizona: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., 1970a, Structure of the western Grand Canyon region, in Hamblin, v. 57, p. 510-519. W. K., and Best, M. G., eds., The western Grand Canyon district: Lucchitta, I., 1975, The Shivwits Plateau, in Application of ERTS images Utah Geol. Soc. Guidebook to the , no. 23, p. 3-19. and image processing to regional geological problems and geologic 1970b, Late Cenozoic basalt flows of the western Grand Canyon, in mapping in northern Arizona: California Inst. Technology Jet Propul- Hamblin, W. K., and Best, M. G., eds., The western Grand Canyon sion Lab. Tech. Rept. 32-1597, p. 41-73. district: Utah Geol. Soc. Guidebook to the Geology of Utah, no. 23, McKee, E. D., 1975, The , subdivision and nomenclature: U.S. p. 21-37. Geol. Survey Bull. 1395-J, p. Jl-Jll. 1974, Late Cenozoic volcanism in the western Grand Canyon, in McKee, E. D., and Schenk, E. T., 1942, The lower canyon lavas and related Breed, W. J., and Roat, E. C., eds., Geology of the Grand Canyon: features at Toroweap in Grand Canyon: Jour. Geomorphology, v. 5, Mus. Northern Arizona and Grand Canyon Natural History Assoc., p. 245-273. p. 142-169. McKee, E. D., and others, 1967, Evolution of the Colorado River in Heck, N. H., 1947, Earthquake history of the United States, Pt. 1, Conti- Arizona: Mus. Northern Arizona Bull. 44, 67 p. nental United States (exclusive of California and western Nevada) and Sturgul, J. R., and Irwin, T. D., 1971, Earthquake history of Arizona and Alaska: U.S. Coast and Geod. Survey, ser. 609, 83 p. New Mexico, 1850-1966: Arizona Geol. Soc. Digest, v. 9, p. 1-37. Huntington, E., and Goldthwait, J. W., 1903, The Hurricane fault in Townley, S. D., and Allen, M. W., 1939, Descriptive catalogue of earth- southwestern Utah: Jour. Geology, v. 11, p. 46-63. quakes of the Pacific coast of the United States, 1769 to 1928: Seismol. Huntoon, P. W., 1974, The post-Paleozoic structural geology of the eastern Soc. America Bull., v. 29, p. 1-297. Grand Canyon, Arizona, in Breed, W. J., and Roat, E. C., eds., Geol- U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, 1928-1951, United States earthquakes. ogy of the Grand Canyon; Mus. Northern Arizona and Grand Canyon Young, R. A., 1970, Geomorphological implications of pre-Colorado and Natural History Assoc., p. 82-115. Colorado tributary drainage in the western Grand Canyon region: Koons, E. D., 1945, Geology of the Uinkaret plateau, northern Arizona: Plateau, v. 42, p. 107-117. Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 56, p. 151-180. 1964, Structure of the eastern Hualapai Indian Reservation: Arizona MANUSCRIPT RECEIVED BY THE SOCIETY APRIL 12, 1976 Geol. Soc. Digest, v. 7, p. 97-114. REVISED MANUSCRIPT RECEIVED SEPTEMBER 23, 1976 Kurie, A. E., 1966, Recurrent structural disturbance of Colorado plateau MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED DECEMBER 3, 1976

Printed in U.S.A.

Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/88/11/1619/3429262/i0016-7606-88-11-1619.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021