DOCSLIB.ORG

BEFORE the FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION American

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION American Democracy Legal Fund 455 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 rtUR Complainant, V. o ro -n c:.:; "ri 21 -C" r'M Republican National Committee D CD r?."r' Opi 310 First Street, SE """ 1 a ,, "i ro i *. .1 ' • Washington, DC 20003 1 CO "*• * * J • ^ COr-i T'-r 4 n"; ... -. r' • American Crossroads i— • ;' : ns .» 4 !"• 1 P.O. Box 34414 i.,o• • — —1 I ITJ Washington, DC 2O043 X" 1— o Crossroads GPS P.O. Box 34413 8 Washington, DC 20043 Americans for Prosperity 2111 Wilson Blvd, Suite #350 Arlington, V A 22201 GOP Data Trust LLC 735 8th Street SE, Suite #200 Washington, DC 20003 i360, LLC 2300 Clarendon Blvd, Suite #800 Arlington, VA 22201 Respondents. COMPLAINT Complainant files this complaint with the Federal Election Commission (the "FEC" or "Commission") under 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(l) against the Republican National Committee, Anthony Parker, Treasurer, (the "RNC"); American Crossroads, Caleb Crosby, Treasurer ("American Crossroads"); Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies ("Crossroads GPS"); -1- Americans for Prosperity ("AFP"); the GOP Data Trust LLC ("Data Trust"); and i360, LLC ("1360") (collectively "Respondents") for numerous violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the "Act"). Based on numerous recent press reports and public admissions, Respondents appear to be illegally coordinating through the ongoing exchange of non-public strategic campaign and party data resulting in millions of dollars in prohibited contributions from Super PACs and corporations to Republican campaigns and parties in the form of "coordinated communications." In sum, the RNC has created a for-profit entity, the Data Trust, charged with maintaining, sharing, and operating the RNC's vast database of information concerning hundreds of millions of Americans. The Data Trust not only operates the RNC's voter file, but also apparently provides the same data to American Crossroads, Crossroads GPS, and presumably numerous other outside organizations that are legally required to operate independently of the Republican Party and its candidates. Recently, the RNC and the Data Trust have also started passing party and campaign data to the Koch brother's organization, AFP and all customers of the Data Trust's new partner 1360, a data management firm that supplies voter information to other conservative organizations. Significantly for purposes of the Act, the Data Trust has now unveiled a new technical upgrade that allows the RNC, Republican campaigns, and "everyone on [their] side,"' to not only "access voter information anytime ... but update it instantly, so others viewing the voter lists can see the information immediately."^ The move to a real time exchange of non­ public, strategically naaterial data through a common vendor constitutes "coordination" under the Act, and means that the purported "independent expenditures" of American Crossroads, ' Matea Gold, "Americans for Prosperity Plows Millions Into Building Conservative Ground Force," Washington Post (Oct. 6,2014), available flf .hUT)://www.washinutonDOSt.coin/politics/amcriGans-foi-nrosperitv-Dlows-millions- mtd-buildinE-conservativc-aroundTibrce/20l4/l0/06/692469bgr4b35-l Ie4-b72e-d60a9229cc 10 .stQrv.html. " Alex. Roa'rty, "Did the GOP Just Take a Big Leap Forward in Data?" National Journal (July 14,2014), available at littp://www.nationaiiounial.com/politics/did.-.thergoD-iust-ta"ke-a-bie-leap-^forward-in-data-201.40714. -2- Crossroads GPS, AFP and other outside organizations are in fact, excessive, illegal, in-kind contributions to the RNC. Furthermore, American Crossroads, Crossroads GPS and presumably other outside groups are paying the Data Trust such significant sums that the Data Trust can apparently charge the RNC far less than the fair market value for the extensive data services that it reportedly provides. Outside groups that accept unlimited contributions from undisclosed dark money sources are subsidizing the RNC's entire data program in violation of the law. Finally, the mere 4 fact that the RNC established, financed, maintains and controls the Data Trust is itself a violation 3 of law, since the Data Trust accepts and spends sums not subject to the contribution limits, f source restrictions, or reporting requirements of the Act. Data and analytics are some of the most important aspects of running a modern political campaign, informing every critical strategic decision. The Republican Party, Republican campaigns, one of the biggest Republican Super PACs, the Koch brothers' AFP, and the largest outside organizations supporting the Republican Party platform are operating by using the same data, and exchanging all of their information related to that data in real time. This amounts to illegal coordination, and the FEC should act immediately to investigate the full scope of these violations, determine what other parties, campaigns, and outside groups are also illegally sharing data, ensure they cease immediately, and seek the appropriate financial penalties. A. Factual Background 1. The RNG Greated the Data Trust to Administer the Committee's Database of Voter Lists and Information. -3- In 2011, the RNC formed a for-profit entity, the Data Trust, "to shoulder the cost of maintaining and improving the party's voter file."^ The intention was for the Data Trust to be the centralized vehicle through which the Republican Party's database of information regarding voters could be maintained, updated and shared with candidates and allied groups throughout the countryNews articles indicate that the Data Trust is not only "backed by the Republican National Committee,"^ but is "effectively a subsidiary of the RNC."® Key members of the 0 Republican Party infrastructure were selected for high ranking positions at the Data Trust. Mike ^ Duncan, a former chairman of the RNC, has also served as chairman of the Data Trust.' Johnny 4 3 DeStafano, the executive director of the Data Trust, is a former high ranking aide to John ? Boehner, and the former deputy executive director of the National Republican Congressional Committee.® After the Party's defeat in the Presidential election in 2012, the Republicans doubled down on their efforts given the extreme significance of voter file data. The Party's own post­ election report noted that "[u]se of data and measurement is critical," and highlighted the "need [for] candidates, rnanagers. Party operatives, communications professionals, fundraisers and strategists who understand and are willing to employ data in decision-making at every level."' The Data Trust continues to play a significant role in the stated goal of the Republican Party "to ' Eliana Johnson, "RNC's Data Push Greeted with Skepticism," National Review (Feb. 2,2014), available at http://www.natidnalreview.com/articic/370962/rncsrdata-pu5h-Ereeted-skepticism-eliana-i6hnson. '' Chris Moody, "Republican National Committee To Build Platform to Share Voter Data," Yahoo News (Mar. 15, 2013), available at http://news.vahoo.com/blocs/the-ticket/republican-national-committee-build-voter-data-sliarine- platfonn-090301874-election.html. Roarty, "Did the GOP Just Take a Big Leap Forward in Data?". ® Eliana Johnson, "The GOP's Data Surge," National Review (January 16,2014), available at linp://www.nationalreview.com/article/36858l/eopsrdata-surEe-eiiana-iohnson. ' Johnson, "RNC's Data Push Greeted vvith Skepticism". ' David Dnieker, "Data Trust Hires ex-Boehner Aide Johnny DeStafano to.Run GOP Technology Effort," Washington Examiner (July 29,2013), available at http://washinetonexaminer.com/data-trust-hires-ex-boehner- aide-iohnnv-desiefaho-to-iun-eop-technoloEV-efFort/aiticle/2533603. ' Republican National Committee, Growth & Qpppitunity Project 25, available at http://erowthopp.eop.com/RNC Growth Opportunitv Book 2013.pdf. -4- generate better data for everyone."'" Beyond simply "exercising control" over the RNC's voter list project and "manag[ing] RNC data," the Data Trust "manage[s] the open platform that will be built using RNC data."" 2. The Data Trust Serves as the Voter File Vendor both for Republican Candidates and Committees and for Supposedly "Independent" Outside Groups. The Data Trust platform allows "Republican campaigns and their allies to share voter 1 information with one another in real time," so that "campaigns and 'approved outside groups' ^ can access a voter's information anytime, update a voter's information instantly, and 4 3. automatically see the information that other campaigns or outside groups add to a voter's record."'^ The RNC's own spokesperson described this platform as the way the Party "is going to create an open data environment to give Republican data users more access to the RNC's premier data warehouse," to use for their own political activities.'^ In her words, any time the RNC collects data on a voter that can be used to target advertisements and to hone the party's message, "we want to have that information and share that with everyone on our side."''' This "open data environment" is open not only to all outside organizations that access data through the Data Trust, but also all organizations that obtain their data from i360, the Koch brothers' data operation. i360 describes itself as a "leading data and technology resource for the pro-free-market political and advocacy conununity."'® It not only has a"comprehensive national data warehouse" containing "hundreds of data points on every American adult that is currently or potentially politically active," but also offers its partners "a host of technologies such as Chris Moody, "Republican National Committee to Build Platform to Share Voter Data". " Thomas Edsail, "In Data We Trust," N.Y. Times (May 8,2013), available at http://opinionator.blogs.nvtimes.com/2013/05/08/in-data-we-trust. Roarty, "Did the GOP Just Take a Big Leap Forward in Data?" " Rachel Weiner, "RNC Launching New Data-Sharing Platform," Washington Post (May 1, 2013), available at htlp://www.."wash'inatonn6sl:com/b.l&Es/pQSt-politics/wp/2613/05/0 i/rnc-.launchiiie-new-data-sharing-platfbrm/. Gold, "Americans for Prosperity Plows Millions Into Building Conservative Ground Force". " See i360, http://www.i-360.com/ (last accessed Sep.
Recommended publications
  • Nominations of Hon. David C. Williams, Hon. Robert M

    Nominations of Hon. David C. Williams, Hon. Robert M

    S. Hrg. 115–450 NOMINATIONS OF HON. DAVID C. WILLIAMS, HON. ROBERT M. DUNCAN, AND CALVIN R. TUCKER TO BE GOVERNORS, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION NOMINATIONS OF THE HONORABLE DAVID C. WILLIAMS, THE HONORABLE ROBERT M. DUNCAN, AND CALVIN R. TUCKER TO BE GOVERNORS, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE APRIL 18, 2018 Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.Govinfo.gov/ Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 32–453 PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin, Chairman JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri ROB PORTMAN, Ohio THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware RAND PAUL, Kentucky HEIDI HEITKAMP, North Dakota JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma GARY C. PETERS, Michigan MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming MAGGIE HASSAN, New Hampshire JOHN HOEVEN, North Dakota KAMALA D. HARRIS, California STEVE DAINES, Montana DOUG JONES, Alabama CHRISTOPHER R. HIXON, Staff Director GABRIELLE D’ADAMO SINGER, Chief Counsel JENNIFER L. SELDE, Professional Staff Member MARGARET E. DAUM, Minority Staff Director DONALD K. SHERMAN, Minority Senior Advisor LAURA W. KILBRIDE, Chief Clerk BONNI E. DINERSTEIN, Hearing Clerk (II) C O N T E N T S Opening statements: Page Senator Johnson ............................................................................................... 1 Senator McCaskill ...........................................................................................
  • 1. 60 Plus Association, Inc. 2. Adams, Victoria Jackson Gray 3

    1. 60 Plus Association, Inc. 2. Adams, Victoria Jackson Gray 3

    PLAINTIFFS IN THE CONSOLIDATED LAWSUITS (in alphabetical order) 1. 60 Plus Association, Inc. 2. Adams, Victoria Jackson Gray 3. AFL-CIO Committee on Political Education Political Contributions Committee 4. Alabama Republican Executive Committee, as governing body for the Alabama Republican Party 5. Alby, Barbara 6. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) 7. American Federal of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) 8. Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. 9. Associated Buildings and Contractors Political Action Committee 10. Association of Community Organizers for Reform Now 11. Barr, Representative Bob 12. Bolton, Carrie 13. Boyd, Douglas R., Sr. 14. Brown, Cynthia 15. California Democratic Party 16. California Public Interest Research Group 17. California Republican Party 18. Center for Individual Freedom 19. Chamber of Commerce of the United States 20. Christian Coalition of America, Inc. 21. Citizens United 22. Citizens United Political Victory Fund 23. Cloud, Michael 24. Club for Growth 25. Connors, Martin 26. Cressman, Derek 27. Dallas County (Iowa) Republican County Central Committee 28. Duncan, Mike, as member and Treasurer of RNC 29. Dupage Political Action Council 30. Echols, Emily 31. Fannie Lou Hamer Project 32. Fitzgerald, Victoria 33. Gun Owners of America Political Victory Fund 34. Gun Owners of America, Inc. 35. Hilliard, Rep. Earl F. 36. Howell, Carla 37. Indiana Family Institute 38. Jefferson County Republican Executive Committee 39. Joshi, Anurada 40. Kostmayer, Peter 41. Libertarian National Committee, Inc. 42. Libertarian Party of Illinois 43. Massachusetts Public Interest Research Group 44. McConnell, Senator Mitch 45. McDow, Hannah 46. McDow, Isaac 47. McInerney, Thomas E. 48. Mitchell, Jessica 49. Morgan, Timothy J.
  • Brief of United States Senatorsenatorssss Sheldon Whitehouse and John Mccain As Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents ______

    Brief of United States Senatorsenatorssss Sheldon Whitehouse and John Mccain As Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents ______

    No. 11-1179 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States _______________ AMERICAN TRADITION PARTNERSHIP , INC ., F.K.A. WESTERN TRADITION PARTNERSHIP , INC ., ET AL ., Petitioners, v. STEVE BULLOCK , ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MONTANA , ET AL ., Respondents . _______________ On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Supreme Court of Montana _______________ BRIEF OF UNITED STATES SENATORSENATORSSSS SHELDON WHITEHOUSE AND JOHN MCCAIN AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS _______________ NEAL KUMAR KATYAL Counsel of Record JUDITH E. COLEMAN HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 555 Thirteenth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 637-5528 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................... ii STATEMENT OF INTEREST .................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ..................................... 2 ARGUMENT ............................................................... 3 I. THE MONTANA SUPREME COURT APPLIED THE CORRECT LEGAL STANDARD TO THE FACTUAL RECORD BEFORE IT. ........................................................... 3 II. THE COURT SHOULD IN ALL EVENTS DECLINE PETITIONERS’ INVITATION TO SUMMARILY REVERSE. ............................... 5 A. Political Spending After Citizens United Demonstrates that Coordination and Disclosure Rules Do Not Impose a Meaningful Check on the System. ................... 8 B. Unlimited, Coordinated and Undisclosed Spending Creates a Strong Potential for Quid Pro Quo Corruption. ........ 17 C. The Appearance of Corruption
  • The Impact of Organizational Characteristics on Super PAC

    The Impact of Organizational Characteristics on Super PAC

    The Impact of Organizational Characteristics on Super PAC Financing and Independent Expenditures Paul S. Herrnson University of Connecticut [email protected] Presented at the Meeting of the Campaign Finance Task Force, Bipartisan Policy Center, Washington, DC, April 21, 2017 (revised June 2017). 1 Exe cutive Summa ry Super PACs have grown in number, wealth, and influence since the Supreme Court laid the foundation for their formation in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, and the decisions reached by other courts and the FEC clarified the boundaries of their political participation. Their objectives and activities also have evolved. Super PACs are not nearly as monolithic as they have been portrayed by the media. While it is inaccurate to characterize them as representative of American society, it is important to recognize that they vary in wealth, mission, structure, affiliation, political perspective, financial transparency, and how and where they participate in political campaigns. Organizational characteristics influence super PAC financing, including the sums they raise. Organizational characteristics also affect super PAC independent expenditures, including the amounts spent, the elections in which they are made, the candidates targeted, and the tone of the messages delivered. The super PAC community is not static. It is likely to continue to evolve in response to legal challenges; regulatory decisions; the objectives of those who create, administer, and finance them; and changes in the broader political environment. 2 Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Data and Methods 4 III. Emergence and Development 7 IV. Organizational Characteristics 11 A. Finances 11 B. Mission 14 C. Affiliation 17 D. Financial Transparency 19 E.
  • The Rise and Impact of Fact-Checking in U.S. Campaigns by Amanda Wintersieck a Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment O

    The Rise and Impact of Fact-Checking in U.S. Campaigns by Amanda Wintersieck a Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment O

    The Rise and Impact of Fact-Checking in U.S. Campaigns by Amanda Wintersieck A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved April 2015 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Kim Fridkin, Chair Mark Ramirez Patrick Kenney ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY May 2015 ABSTRACT Do fact-checks influence individuals' attitudes and evaluations of political candidates and campaign messages? This dissertation examines the influence of fact- checks on citizens' evaluations of political candidates. Using an original content analysis, I determine who conducts fact-checks of candidates for political office, who is being fact- checked, and how fact-checkers rate political candidates' level of truthfulness. Additionally, I employ three experiments to evaluate the impact of fact-checks source and message cues on voters' evaluations of candidates for political office. i DEDICATION To My Husband, Aza ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my sincerest thanks to the many individuals who helped me with this dissertation and throughout my graduate career. First, I would like to thank all the members of my committee, Professors Kim L. Fridkin, Patrick Kenney, and Mark D. Ramirez. I am especially grateful to my mentor and committee chair, Dr. Kim L. Fridkin. Your help and encouragement were invaluable during every stage of this dissertation and my graduate career. I would also like to thank my other committee members and mentors, Patrick Kenney and Mark D. Ramirez. Your academic and professional advice has significantly improved my abilities as a scholar. I am grateful to husband, Aza, for his tireless support and love throughout this project.
  • Irving Moskowitz, Controversial Backer of Israeli Settlements, Gives $1 Million to Anti- Obama Super PAC

    Irving Moskowitz, Controversial Backer of Israeli Settlements, Gives $1 Million to Anti- Obama Super PAC

    UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05794264 Date: 11/30/2015 RELEASE IN PART B6 From: H <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 1:12 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: Fw: Worth reading. From: sbwhoeop [mailto Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:25 AM Subject: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/12/irving-moskowitz-israeli-settlements-anti-obama-super-pac_n_1416041.html 14161 Blumenthal paulblumenthalnhuffincitonpost.com Irving Moskowitz, Controversial Backer Of Israeli Settlements, Gives $1 Million To Anti- Obama Super PAC Posted: 04/12/2012 9:21 am By Paul Blumenthal WASHINGTON -- Even in the era of unbridled campaign contributions, Irving Moskowitz's $1 million donation in February to American Crossroads, the Karl Rove-linked super PAC, is eye-catching. A retired physician who made a fortune purchasing hospitals and running bingo and casino operations in the economically depressed California town of Hawaiian Gardens, Moskowitz is well- known to those who follow the Israel-Palestine conflict. His contributions to far-right Jewish settler groups, questionable archaeological projects and widespread land purchases in East Jerusalem and the West Bank have routinely inflamed the region over the past four decades and, according to many familiar with the conflict, made him a key obstacle to peace in the Middle East. Now, at age 83, Moskowitz has turned his money on the American political realm in a more prominent fashion than ever before, funding "birther" groups that question the legitimacy of President Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship and others that stoke fears about the president's alleged ties to "radical Islam." Although he has funded Republican politicians and organizations in the past, his $1 million donation to American Crossroads is his biggest contribution to U.S.
  • Journal of Visual Culture

    Journal of Visual Culture

    Journal of Visual Culture http://vcu.sagepub.com/ Just Joking? Chimps, Obama and Racial Stereotype Dora Apel Journal of Visual Culture 2009 8: 134 DOI: 10.1177/14704129090080020203 The online version of this article can be found at: http://vcu.sagepub.com/content/8/2/134 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Journal of Visual Culture can be found at: Email Alerts: http://vcu.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://vcu.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://vcu.sagepub.com/content/8/2/134.refs.html >> Version of Record - Nov 20, 2009 What is This? Downloaded from vcu.sagepub.com at WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY on October 8, 2014 134 journal of visual culture 8(2) Just Joking? Chimps, Obama and Racial Stereotype We are decidedly not in a ‘post-racial’ America, whatever that may look like; indeed, many have been made more uneasy by the election of a black president and the accompanying euphoria, evoking a concomitant racial backlash in the form of allegedly satirical visual imagery. Such imagery attempts to dispel anxieties about race and ‘blackness’ by reifying the old racial stereotypes that suggest African Americans are really culturally and intellectually inferior and therefore not to be feared, that the threat of blackness can be neutralized or subverted through caricature and mockery. When the perpetrators and promulgators of such imagery are caught in the light of national media and accused of racial bias, whether blatant or implied, they always resort to the same ideological escape hatch: it was only ‘a joke’.
  • 'Distinguished Awards' at MSU Dr. Duncan to Receive Honorary

    'Distinguished Awards' at MSU Dr. Duncan to Receive Honorary

    Four receive 'Distinguished Awards' at MSU Morehead State University's annual Academic Awards Convocation honored achievements by outstanding students as well as the recipients of the distinguished faculty and staff awards. After the ceremony, the honorees posed for an official photograph with MSU President Wayne D. Andrews, far left, and Provost Michael Moore, far right. They included, from left, Dr. Sylvia B. Henneberg , associate professor of English and director of the Interdisciplinary Women's Studies Program, Distinguished Teacher Award; April Haight,energy conservation manager, Distinguished Staff Service Award; Dr. Bruce A. Mattingly , professor and chair in the Department of Psychology, Distinguished Faculty Service Award; and Stephen J. Tirone, associate professor of art, Distinguished Creative Productions Award. Distinguished Creative Productions Award and Distinguished Teacher Award link Distinguished Faculty and Staff Awards link Posted: 5-1-06 Dr. Duncan to receive honorary Doctor of Public Service degree A man who has dedicated much of his life to excellence in education, pursuit of the public good, and the business of government will receive an honorary doctoral degree from Morehead State University at the 2006 Spring Commencement ceremonies on Saturday, May 13. MSU Board of Regents Chair James H. Booth will present the honorary Doctor of Public Service degree to Dr. Robert M. (Mike) Duncan of Inez. More than 1,000 students are candidates for degrees which will be conferred by MSU President Wayne D. Andrews during the 10:30 a.m. ceremony at the Academic- Athletic Center. A banker and attorney, Duncan has served in a leadership role on the governing boards of many private and public institutions, including six years on Morehead State's Board of Regents, where he was chairman from 1984-86, and as chair of the Board of Trustees of Alice Lloyd College.
  • The Fourteen-Billion-Dollar Election Emerging Campaign Finance Trends and Their Impact on the 2020 Presidential Race and Beyond

    The Fourteen-Billion-Dollar Election Emerging Campaign Finance Trends and Their Impact on the 2020 Presidential Race and Beyond

    12 The Fourteen-Billion-Dollar Election Emerging Campaign Finance Trends and their Impact on the 2020 Presidential Race and Beyond Michael E. Toner and Karen E. Trainer The 2020 presidential and congressional election was the most expensive election in American history, shattering previous fundraising and spending records. Total spending on the 2020 election totaled an estimated $14 bil- lion, which was more than double the amount spent during the 2016 cycle and more than any previous election in U.S. history. 1 The historic 2020 spending tally was more than was spent in the previous two election cycles combined.2 Moreover, former Vice President Joseph Biden and Senator Kamala Harris made fundraising history in 2020 as their presidential campaign became the first campaign in history to raise over $1 billion in a single election cycle, with a total of $1.1 billion.3 For their part, President Trump and Vice Presi- dent Pence raised in excess of $700 million for their presidential campaign, more than double the amount that they raised in 2016.4 The record amount of money expended on the 2020 election was also fu- eled by a significant increase in spending by outside groups such as Super PACs as well as enhanced congressional candidate fundraising. Political party expenditures increased in 2020, but constituted a smaller share of total electoral spending. Of the $14 billion total, approximately $6.6 billion was spent in connection with the presidential race and $7.2 billion was expended at the congressional level.5 To put those spending amounts into perspective, the $7.2 billion tally at the congressional level nearly equals the GDP of Monaco.6 More than $1 billion of the $14 billion was spent for online advertising on platforms such as Facebook and Google.7 203 204 Michael E.
  • Amicus Briefs

    Amicus Briefs

    Case: 18-16663, 03/20/2019, ID: 11235601, DktEntry: 39, Page 1 of 46 No. 18-16663 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ___________________ CITY OF OAKLAND; and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. B.P. P.L.C.; CHEVRON CORPORATION; CONOCOPHILLIPS; EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION; ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC; and DOES, 1 through 10, Defendants-Appellees. On Appeal from The United States District Court, Northern District of California Case Nos. 3:17-cv-06011-WHA, 3:17-cv-06012-WHA (Hon. William H. Alsup) ___________________ BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE SENATORS SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, DIANNE FEINSTEIN, RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, MAZIE K. HIRONO, EDWARD J. MARKEY, AND KAMALA D. HARRIS IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEES AND REVERSAL ___________________ Gerson H. Smoger Robert S. Peck SMOGER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL 13250 Branch View Ln. LITIGATION, P.C. Dallas, TX 75234 455 Massachusetts Ave., N.W. (972) 243-5297 Washington, DC 20001 (510) 531-4529 (202) 944-2874 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Amici Curiae Case: 18-16663, 03/20/2019, ID: 11235601, DktEntry: 39, Page 2 of 46 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 26.1, amici curiae certify that they are individuals and not corporations. i Case: 18-16663, 03/20/2019, ID: 11235601, DktEntry: 39, Page 3 of 46 TABLE OF CONTENTS CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT …………………………………….i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ..……………………………………………………..iv AMICI CURIAE’S IDENTITY, INTEREST, AND AUTHORITY TO FILE ……1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ……………………………………………………4 ARGUMENT ………………………………………………………………………5 I. THE LOWER COURT’S DECISION WITH RESPECT TO THE SEPARATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE RELIED ON INCOMPLETE INFORMATION AS TO DEFENDANTS’ OWN EFFORTS TO PREVENT POLICIES THAT ADDRESS CLIMATE CHANGE ………………………...5 A.
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO Conservative

    UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO Conservative

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO Conservative Politics in a Time of “Fake News” and Irrelevant Truths A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology by Ian Mullins Committee in Charge: Professor Isaac Martin, Chair Professor Richard Biernacki Professor Amy Binder Professor Robert Horwitz Professor Christena Turner 2018 Copyright Ian Mullins, 2018 All Rights Reserved The Dissertation of Ian Mullins is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2018 iii EPIGRAPH "Alas," said the mouse, "the whole world is growing smaller every day. At the beginning it was so big that I was afraid, I kept running and running, and I was glad when I saw walls far away to the right and left, but these long walls have narrowed so quickly that I am in the last chamber already, and there in the corner stands the trap that I must run into." "You only need to change your direction," said the cat, and ate it up. Franz Kafka, A Little Fable iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ............................................................................................................................... iii Epigraph ......................................................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ v
  • Television Advertising in 2012

    Television Advertising in 2012

    Television Advertising in 2012 WMP Directors: Erika Franklin Fowler, Michael M. Franz & Travis N. Ridout Brought to you by: Thanks also to: Kantar Media/CMAG Frequency Data Online Coding Tool Data We Collect • Sponsor (candidate, party, interest group) • Tone (positive, negative, contrast) • Issue themes, personal traits/adjectives & policy vs. personality balance of spot • Major politician mentions & tone • Mentions of party affiliation, magic words, etc. • Emotional appeals, music, voiceovers TRENDS IN VOLUME, COST, AND SPONSORSHIP Volume and Cost of Ads in 2012 Race Ad Airings Est. Cost House 685,787 $443,105,900 Senate 952,135 $558,121,120 President 1,431,939 $950,436,980 All federal 3,042,861 $1,923,754,550 Source: Wesleyan Media Project; Kantar Media/CMAG data Note: Local broadcast and national cable ads Ads in Presidential Race (6/1 to Election Day) 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 2004 2008 2012 Source: Wisconsin Advertising Project and Wesleyan Media Project; Kantar Media/CMAG data Note: Local broadcast and national cable ads Interest Group Activity Skyrockets in Presidential Primaries 59.1% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 14.5% 10.0% 4.1% 2.8% 0.0% 2000 2004 2008 2012 Source: Wisconsin Advertising Project and Wesleyan Media Project; Kantar Media/CMAG data Note: Local broadcast and national cable ads Top Advertisers in General Election Barack Obama 511,513 Mitt Romney 207,984 American Crossroads 81,553 Restore Our Future, Inc. 62,557 Crossroads GPS 61,610 Priorities USA Action 58,990 Americans for Prosperity 40,465 RNC 35,825 RNC & Romney 33,456 Americans for Job Security 10,410 American Future Fund 7,438 DNC & Obama 7,210 Source: Wesleyan Media Project; Kantar Media/CMAG data Money Isn’t Everything 700,000 600,000 +$1M 500,000 400,000 Pro-Obama 300,000 Pro-Romney 200,000 100,000 - Pres.