DOCSLIB.ORG

Vote Summary Report Reporting Period: 01/01/2016 to 12/31/2016 Institution Account(S): AFL-CIO Reserve Fund

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vote Summary Report Reporting Period: 01/01/2016 to 12/31/2016 Institution Account(S): AFL-CIO Reserve Fund Vote Summary Report Reporting Period: 01/01/2016 to 12/31/2016 Institution Account(s): AFL-CIO Reserve Fund 3M Company Meeting Date: 05/10/2016 Country: USA Primary Security ID: 88579Y101 Record Date: 03/11/2016 Meeting Type: Annual Primary CUSIP: 88579Y101 Shares Voted: 357 Proposal Vote Number Proposal Text Instruction 1a Elect Director Sondra L. Barbour For Voter Rationale: In voting on nominees for the board of directors, the shareholder examines each nominee to determine if he or she is an independent outsider or an insider (e.g., a key executive, a relative of a key executive, a contractor with the company). It is in the best interests of shareholders for there to be a two-thirds majority of independent outsiders on the board to supervise management. There is such a majority here. A vote is cast for all nominees. 1b Elect Director Thomas 'Tony' K. Brown For 1c Elect Director Vance D. Coffman For 1d Elect Director David B. Dillon For 1e Elect Director Michael L. Eskew For 1f Elect Director Herbert L. Henkel For 1g Elect Director Muhtar Kent For 1h Elect Director Edward M. Liddy For 1i Elect Director Gregory R. Page For 1j Elect Director Inge G. Thulin For 1k Elect Director Robert J. Ulrich For 1l Elect Director Patricia A. Woertz For 2 Ratify PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Against Auditors Voter Rationale: This proposal seeks the approval of the reappointment of auditors and their remuneration. Normally this would be considered a routine, ministerial proposal and a vote would be cast in favor. At this company, however, it has been disclosed that the auditors are paid a substantial amount for non-audit work in addition to their audit work. This creates a potential conflict of interest for the auditors. For that reason, a vote is cast against. 3 Advisory Vote to Ratify Named Executive For Officers' Compensation Voter Rationale: This proposal would approve the company's overall executive compensation policies and procedures. This proposal is not binding. Its approval or disapproval will serve as an advisory recommendation to the board. Compared to its peer groups, for performance the company has outperformed its peer companies and for compensation it has overcompensated its executive officer. When other elements of the company's compensation practices are factored in (dilution in stock plans, restricted stock grants, golden parachutes, tax gross ups), these policies and procedures are not excessive, they do reflect the company's performance for shareholders, and are in the best interests of shareholders. Therefore, a vote is cast for this proposal. Page 1 of 625 Vote Summary Report Reporting Period: 01/01/2016 to 12/31/2016 Institution Account(s): AFL-CIO Reserve Fund 3M Company Proposal Vote Number Proposal Text Instruction 4 Approve Omnibus Stock Plan Against Voter Rationale: A stock plan for key executives is established by this proposal. In order to reward past superior performance and to encourage that performance in the future, such plans must specify performance standards for the granting of options. Combined with shares in other stock plans at the company, the number of shares requested would cause in excess of 13.37% dilution of current shareholder equity. Performance standards upon which to base the granting of options are not specified in the plan. Instead, there is broad discretion in determining option awards. The plan also contains change-in-control provisions which can be costly to shareholders because they could discourage a potential takeover of the company that would be beneficial to shareholders. Thus, a vote is cast against the proposal. 5 Reduce Ownership Threshold for For Shareholders to Call Special Meetings Voter Rationale: The board seeks shareholder approval to reduce the ownership threshold required to call a special meeting from 25 percent to 15 percent of outstanding shares. That would be in the best interests of shareholders. A vote is cast in favor. 6 Exclude the Impact of Stock Buyback For Programs on the Financial Metrics on which CEO Pay is Based Voter Rationale: This shareholder proposal urges the Compensation Committee to adopt a policy to adjust financial performance metrics to neutralize the impact of share repurchases when assessing CEO performance. Metrics that are intended to drive CEO performance may be inflated by share repurchases, which is not a genuine reflection of performance but rather a financing tool. Executive performance-based pay should incentivize performance and neutralizing share repurchases from an assessment of metrics would ensure that link. A vote is cast in favor. Abbott Laboratories Meeting Date: 04/29/2016 Country: USA Primary Security ID: 002824100 Record Date: 03/02/2016 Meeting Type: Annual Primary CUSIP: 002824100 Shares Voted: 861 Proposal Vote Number Proposal Text Instruction 1.1 Elect Director Robert J. Alpern For Voter Rationale: In voting on nominees for the board of directors, the shareholder examines each nominee to determine if he or she is an independent outsider or an insider (e.g., a key executive, a relative of a key executive, a contractor with the company). It is in the best interests of shareholders for there to be a two-thirds majority of independent outsiders on the board to supervise management. There is such a majority here. A vote is cast for all nominees. 1.2 Elect Director Roxanne S. Austin For 1.3 Elect Director Sally E. Blount For 1.4 Elect Director W. James Farrell For 1.5 Elect Director Edward M. Liddy For 1.6 Elect Director Nancy McKinstry For 1.7 Elect Director Phebe N. Novakovic For Page 2 of 625 Vote Summary Report Reporting Period: 01/01/2016 to 12/31/2016 Institution Account(s): AFL-CIO Reserve Fund Abbott Laboratories Proposal Vote Number Proposal Text Instruction 1.8 Elect Director William A. Osborn For 1.9 Elect Director Samuel C. Scott, III For 1.10 Elect Director Glenn F. Tilton For 1.11 Elect Director Miles D. White For 2 Ratify Ernst & Young LLP as Auditors Against Voter Rationale: This proposal seeks the approval of the reappointment of auditors and their remuneration. Normally this would be considered a routine, ministerial proposal and a vote would be cast in favor. At this Company, however, it has been disclosed that the auditors are paid a substantial amount for non-audit work in addition to their audit work. This creates a potential conflict of interest for the auditors. For that reason, a vote is cast against. 3 Advisory Vote to Ratify Named Executive Against Officers' Compensation Voter Rationale: This proposal would approve the Company's overall executive compensation policies and procedures. This proposal is not binding. Its approval or disapproval will serve as an advisory recommendation to the Board. Compared to its peer groups, for performance the Company has underperformed its peer companies and for compensation it has overcompensated its executive officer. When other elements of the Company's compensation practices are factored in (dilution in stock plans, restricted stock grants, golden parachutes, tax gross ups), these policies and procedures do not reflect the Company's performance for shareholders, and are not in the best interests of shareholders. Therefore, a vote is cast against this proposal. AbbVie Inc. Meeting Date: 05/06/2016 Country: USA Primary Security ID: 00287Y109 Record Date: 03/09/2016 Meeting Type: Annual Primary CUSIP: 00287Y109 Shares Voted: 943 Proposal Vote Number Proposal Text Instruction 1.1 Elect Director William H.L. Burnside For Voter Rationale: In voting on nominees for the board of directors, the shareholder examines each nominee to determine if he or she is an independent outsider or an insider (e.g., a key executive, a relative of a key executive, a contractor with the company). It is in the best interests of shareholders for there to be a two-thirds majority of independent outsiders on the board to supervise management. There is such a majority here. A vote is cast for all nominees. 1.2 Elect Director Brett J. Hart For 1.3 Elect Director Edward J. Rapp For 2 Ratify Ernst & Young LLP as Auditors Against Voter Rationale: This proposal seeks the approval of the reappointment of auditors and their remuneration. Normally this would be considered a routine, ministerial proposal and a vote would be cast in favor. At this Company, however, it has been disclosed that the auditors are paid a substantial amount for non-audit work in addition to their audit work. This creates a potential conflict of interest for the auditors. For that reason, a vote is cast against. Page 3 of 625 Vote Summary Report Reporting Period: 01/01/2016 to 12/31/2016 Institution Account(s): AFL-CIO Reserve Fund AbbVie Inc. Proposal Vote Number Proposal Text Instruction 3 Advisory Vote to Ratify Named Executive Against Officers' Compensation Voter Rationale: This proposal would approve the Company's overall executive compensation policies and procedures. This proposal is not binding. Its approval or disapproval will serve as an advisory recommendation to the Board. Compared to its peer groups, for performance the Company has underperformed its peer companies and for compensation it has overcompensated its executive officer. When other elements of the Company's compensation practices are factored in (dilution in stock plans, restricted stock grants, golden parachutes, tax gross ups), these policies and procedures are excessive, they do not reflect the Company's performance for shareholders, and are not in the best interests of shareholders. Therefore, a vote is cast against this proposal. 4 Declassify the Board of Directors For Voter Rationale: This proposal declassifies the board, which means that all directors would be elected annually instead of different classes being elected for staggered terms. This enhances the accountability of directors.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Workshop on Venture Capital and Antitrust, February 12, 2020
    Venture Capital and Antitrust Transcript of Proceedings at the Public Workshop Held by the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice February 12, 2020 Paul Brest Hall Stanford University 555 Salvatierra Walk Stanford, CA 94305 Table of Contents Opening Remarks ......................................................................................................................... 1 Fireside Chat with Michael Moritz: Trends in VC Investment: How did we get here? ........ 5 Antitrust for VCs: A Discussion with Stanford Law Professor Doug Melamed ................... 14 Panel 1: What explains the Kill Zones? .................................................................................... 22 Afternoon Remarks .................................................................................................................... 40 Panel 2: Monetizing data ............................................................................................................ 42 Panel 3: Investing in platform-dominated markets ................................................................. 62 Roundtable: Is there a problem and what is the solution? ..................................................... 84 Closing Remarks ......................................................................................................................... 99 Public Workshop on Venture Capital and Antitrust, February 12, 2020 Opening Remarks • Makan Delrahim, Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice MAKAN
    [Show full text]
  • Vsphere 6.5: BIG CHANGES ADVERTORIAL
    December 2016 | Vol. 9 No. 6 VirtualizationReview.com AND THE WINNERS ARE … Our picks for the best, most-useful products of the past year. PLUS > TOP 10 VIRTUALIZATION STORIES OF 2016 > YOUR IoT PLANNING GUIDE > vSPHERE 6.5: BIG CHANGES ADVERTORIAL When dealing with today's ransomware threats, WHY A DRAAS SOLUTION IS YOUR time is your worst enemy. The faster you can detect the encryption, the more time you have to take DRAAS-TICALLY BETTER DEFENSE actions to restore your database or mission-critical application. Simple backup procedures will let you AGAINST RANSOMWARE restore your production database, but it will take If your production database or mission-critical application gets infected, how significantly more time than a modern disaster long would it take you to recover? recovery as a service (DRaaS) solution. Compare the process of restoring a production database from a cloud backup vs. a modern DRaaS solution: Is DB part of a cluster? Repeat each of these steps for each machine connected to cluster. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ransomware Power down Determine Rebuild server Reconfigure Restore clean Inject old DB (from Establish Infection machine date/time (OS and software DB services DB files restored backup) connectivity of infection installation) from backup to rebuilt DB (DB & input svcs) CLOUD BACKUP TOTAL DOWNTIME (BEST CASE): 4-5 hours 1 2 3 4 5 Ransomware Power down Determine date/time Log into DRaaS Boot VM (from DRaaS Infection machine of infection dashboard last clean backup) TOTAL DOWNTIME: 1-2 minutes 3 Ways a DRaaS Solution is DRaaS-tically Better Defense Against Ransomware Dramaticaly Quickly Pinpointing Built-In 1 Faster RTOs 2 the Time of Infection 3 Orchestration DRaaS solutions equip you with the ability to With a cloud backup, it takes a while to determine if your application When it comes to restoring applications and quickly failover productions systems by has been corrupted.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Politics/Personal Authenticity
    PUBLIC POLITICS/PERSONAL AUTHENTICITY: A TALE OF TWO SIXTIES IN HOLLYWOOD CINEMA, 1986- 1994 Oliver Gruner Thesis submitted for the degree of Ph.D. University of East Anglia School of Film and Television Studies August, 2010 ©This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that no quotation from the thesis, nor any information derived therefrom, may be published without the author’s prior, written consent. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 5 Chapter One “The Enemy was in US”: Platoon and Sixties Commemoration 62 Platoon in Production, 1976-1982 65 Public Politics/Personal Authenticity: Platoon from Script to Screen 73 From Vietnam to the Sixties: Promotion and Reception 88 Conclusion 101 Chapter Two “There are a lot of things about me that aren’t what you thought”: Dirty Dancing and Women’s Liberation 103 Dirty Dancing in Production, 1980-1987 106 Public Politics/Personal Authenticity: Dirty Dancing from Script to Screen 114 “Have the Time of Your Life”: Promotion and Reception 131 Conclusion 144 Chapter Three Bad Sixties/ Good Sixties: JFK and the Sixties Generation 146 Lost Innocence/Lost Ignorance: Kennedy Commemoration and the Sixties 149 Innocence Lost: Adaptation and Script Development, 1988-1991 155 In Search of Authenticity: JFK ’s “Good Sixties” 164 Through the Looking Glass: Promotion and Reception 173 Conclusion 185 Chapter Four “Out of the Prison of Your Mind”: Framing Malcolm X 188 A Civil Rights Sixties 191 A Change
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
    1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 2 3 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ................................................................................. 8 4 III. PARTIES .................................................................................................................... 9 5 A. Plaintiffs .......................................................................................................... 9 6 B. Defendants ....................................................................................................... 9 7 IV. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS ................................................................................... 17 8 A. Alphabet’s Reputation as a “Good” Company is Key to Recruiting Valuable Employees and Collecting the User Data that Powers Its 9 Products ......................................................................................................... 17 10 B. Defendants Breached their Fiduciary Duties by Protecting and Rewarding Male Harassers ............................................................................ 19 11 1. The Board Has Allowed a Culture Hostile to Women to Fester 12 for Years ............................................................................................. 19 13 a) Sex Discrimination in Pay and Promotions: ........................... 20 14 b) Sex Stereotyping and Sexual Harassment: .............................. 23 15 2. The New York Times Reveals the Board’s Pattern
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement
    Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, California 94043 (650) 253-0000 zz DEAR STOCKHOLDERS We are pleased to invite you to participate in our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Annual Meeting) to be held on Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 9:00 a.m., Pacific Time. We have adopted a virtual format for our Annual Meeting to provide a consistent experience to all stockholders regardless of location. Alphabet stockholders of Class A or Class B common stock (or their proxy holders) as of the close of business on the record date, April 6, 2021 (Record Date), can participate in and vote at our Annual Meeting by visiting www. virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GOOGL21 and entering the 16-digit control number included in your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (Notice), voting instruction form, or proxy card. All others may view the Annual Meeting through our Investor Relations YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/c/AlphabetIR. Further details regarding participation in the Annual Meeting and the business to be conducted are described in the Notice you received in the mail and in this proxy statement. We have also made available a copy of our 2020 Annual Report to Stockholders (Annual Report) with this proxy statement. We encourage you to read our Annual Report. It includes our audited financial statements and provides information about our business. We have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s “notice and access” rules. We are constantly focused on improving the ways people connect with information, and believe that providing our proxy materials over the Internet increases the ability of our stockholders to connect with the information they need, while reducing the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Contains Forward-Looking Statements Within the Meaning of the Federal Secu
    This Annual Report (including the Founders’ DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION Letter) contains forward-looking statements Directors For further information about Google, within the meaning of the federal securities contact: laws. These forward-looking statements Eric Schmidt Chairman of the Board & Investor Relations include, but are not limited to, statements Chief Executive Officer Google Inc. related to improvements to our search Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway engine, advertising systems, and products Mountain View, California 94043 Sergey Brin [email protected] and services. These forward-looking Co-Founder & President, Technology statements are based on current expectations, Google Inc. You may also visit us by visiting the forecasts, and assumptions and involve a investor relations portion of our website at: Larry Page http://investor.google.com number of risks and uncertainties that could Co-Founder & President, Products cause actual results to differ materially from Google Inc. If you wish to receive stockholder those anticipated by these forward-looking information online, you can register at: L. John Doerr http://investor.google.com/notify.html statements. Such risks and uncertainties General Partner include a variety of factors, some of which Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers Google’s stock trades on the NASDAQ are beyond our control. In particular, such Global Select Market under the ticker John L. Hennessy symbol GOOG. risks and uncertainties include our ability President, Stanford University to innovate and many risks relating to Transfer Agent and Registrar successful development and marketing of Ann Mather Computershare Trust Company, N.A. Former Executive Vice President & P.O. Box 43078 technology, products, and operating systems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Guide to Social Media from the Social Media Guys
    The Complete Guide to Social Media From The Social Media Guys PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:01:07 UTC Contents Articles Social media 1 Social web 6 Social media measurement 8 Social media marketing 9 Social media optimization 11 Social network service 12 Digg 24 Facebook 33 LinkedIn 48 MySpace 52 Newsvine 70 Reddit 74 StumbleUpon 80 Twitter 84 YouTube 98 XING 112 References Article Sources and Contributors 115 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 123 Article Licenses License 125 Social media 1 Social media Social media are media for social interaction, using highly accessible and scalable publishing techniques. Social media uses web-based technologies to turn communication into interactive dialogues. Andreas Kaplan and Michael Haenlein define social media as "a group of Internet-based applications that build on the ideological and technological foundations of Web 2.0, which allows the creation and exchange of user-generated content."[1] Businesses also refer to social media as consumer-generated media (CGM). Social media utilization is believed to be a driving force in defining the current time period as the Attention Age. A common thread running through all definitions of social media is a blending of technology and social interaction for the co-creation of value. Distinction from industrial media People gain information, education, news, etc., by electronic media and print media. Social media are distinct from industrial or traditional media, such as newspapers, television, and film. They are relatively inexpensive and accessible to enable anyone (even private individuals) to publish or access information, compared to industrial media, which generally require significant resources to publish information.
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabet 2020
    Alphabet Alphabet 2020 Annual 2020 Report 2020 Rev2_210419_YIR_Cover.indd 1-3 4/19/21 7:02 PM Alphabet Year in Review 2020 210414_YIR_Design.indd 1 4/15/21 3:57 PM From our CEO 2 Year in Review 210414_YIR_Design.indd 2 4/15/21 3:57 PM To our investors, You might expect a company’s year in review to open with big numbers: how many products we launched, how many consumers and businesses adopted those products, and how much revenue we generated in the process. And, yes, you will see some big numbers shared in the pages of this report and in future earnings calls as well, but 22-plus years in, Google is still not a conventional company (and we don’t intend to become one). And 2020 was anything but a conventional year. That’s why over the past 12 months we’ve measured our success by the people we’ve helped in moments that matter. Our success is in the researchers who used our technology to fight the spread of the coronavirus. It’s in job seekers like Rey Justo, who, after being laid off during the pandemic, earned a Google Career Certificate online and was hired into a great new career. And our success is in all the small businesses who used Google products to continue serving customers and keeping employees on payroll … in the students who kept learning virtually on Google Classroom … and in the grandparents who read bedtime stories to grandchildren from thousands of miles away over Google Meet. We’ve always believed that we only succeed when others do.
    [Show full text]
  • Alan Silvestri
    ALAN SILVESTRI AWARDS/NOMINATIONS EMMY NOMINATION (2014) COSMOS: A SPACETIME ODYSSEY Outstanding Music Composition for a Series / Original Dramatic Score and Outstanding Original Main Title Music WORLD SOUNDTRACK NOMINATION (2008) “A Hero Comes Home” from BEOWULF Best Original Song Written for Film* INTERNATIONAL FILM MUSIC CRITICS BEOWULF ASSOCIATION NOMINATION (2007) Best Original Score-Animated Feature GRAMMY AWARD (20 05) “Believe” from THE POLAR EXPRESS Best Song Written for a Motion Picture* ACADEMY AWARD NOMINATION (2005) “Believe” from THE POLAR EXPRESS Best Original Song* GOLDEN GLOBE NOMINATION (2005) “Believe” from THE POLAR EXPRESS Best Original Song* BRO ADCAST FILM CRITICS CHOICE “Believe” from THE POLAR EXPRESS NOMINATION (2004) Best Song* GRAMMY AWARD (2001) End Credits from CAST AWAY Best Instrumental Composition ACADEMY AWARD NOMINATION (1994) FORREST GUMP Best Original Score GRAMMY AWARD NOMINA TION (1994) “Feather” from FORREST GUMP Best Instrumental Performance GOLDEN GLOBE NOMINATION (1994) FORREST GUMP Best Original Score CABLE ACE AWARD (1990) TALES FROM THE CRYPT: ALL THROUGH Best Original Score THE HOUSE GRAMMY AWARD NOMINATION (1989) Suite from WHO FRAMED ROGER RABBIT? Best Instrumental Composition GRAMMY AWARD NOMINATION (1988) WHO FRAMED ROGER RABBIT? Best Album of Original Score Written for a Motion Picture GRAMMY AWARD NOMINATION (1985) BA CK TO THE FUTURE Best Instrumental Composition 1 The Gorfaine/Schwartz Agency (818) 260-8500 ALAN SILVESTRI GRAMMY AWARD NOMINATION (1985) BACK TO THE FUTURE Best Album of Original Score Written for a Motion Picture *shared nomination/award MOTION PICTURES RUN ALL NIGHT Roy Lee / Michael Tadross / Brooklyn Weaver, prods. Warner Brothers Jaume Collet-Serra, dir. RED 2 Lorenzo di Bonaventura / Mark Vahradian, prods.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Turn Startup Ideas Into Reality by Taking Money from Strangers
    How to turn startup ideas into reality by taking money from strangers © Ian Brookes, Cake Solutions, March 2013 Our speed date agenda • The anatomy of the first date • Love will tear us apart - sing-a-long to Joy Division in the four steps of the 12 minute speed dating waltz • Getting to ‘Yes’ • Lessons Getting from to the Y es:man 3 who Levels invested of Engagement$200k in Google! day one… Emotional! Rational! Financial! Pg 5! © 2011 Peter Evans, MaRS Discovery District ! Personal Scoreboard • Lifetime takings £35.1m • Lifetime ‘failed bids’ £15.25m • Win ratio 70% (Rafa at Chelsea 52%, Evil Lord Ferg 60%) • Biggest fund raising single deal £11m • Toughest deals £25k cash from my mum & dad…and £100k PG from my wife • Most stressful deal £750k needed by midnight…secured at 11.40pm • Emptied the pockets of friends, family & orphans, angels, vulture capitalists, private equity, pension fund managers,TSB…and a drug dealer • No time for Dragon’s Den or Alan Sugar but love The Midwife The Startup/Investor paradox It’s a dislocated dance at the start of the first date Getting to Yes: 3 Levels of Engagement! Finding the right match Speed dating criteria of both parties Emotional! Rational! Financial! Pg 5! © 2011 Peter Evans, MaRS Discovery District ! Components of the speed dating pitch Note: The hero in great stories is not the strongest or most intelligent… it’s the individual who’s learnt the most. Investor Connectivity One hundred start-up investors were asked why they didn’t put funds in…. 68% 14% 9% 5% 3% 1% Investor Connectivity One hundred start-up investors were asked why they didn’t put funds in….
    [Show full text]
  • Don Brochu, Ace Editor
    DON BROCHU, ACE EDITOR FEATURES DANCE CAMP Awesomeness TV Prod: Brian Robbins Dir: Bert & Bertie A CHANGE OF HEART Surprise Film Prod: Emilio Estefan Jr. Dir: Kenny Ortega THIS IS IT Columbia Pictures Prod: Travis Payne, Randy Phillips Dir: Kenny Ortega HIGH SCHOOL MUSICAL 3 Walt Disney Pictures Prod: Todd Murata, Bill Borden Dir: Kenny Ortega THE CHRISTMAS COTTAGE LionsGate Films Prod: Marc Gordon, Jason Constantine, Dir: Michael Campus Donna Sloan, Michael Paseornek IN THE MIX LionsGate Films Prod: Bill Borden, Robert Ortiz Dir: Ron Underwood THE MEDALLION TriStar Pictures Prod: Rick Nathanson, Tim Kwok, Jackie Chan Dir: Gordon Chan THE FIRST $20 MILLION 20th Century Fox Prod: Michele Imperato, Harold Ramis, Dir: Mick Jackson IS ALWAYS THE HARDEST Trevor Albert BLAST FROM THE PAST New Line Cinema Prod: Amanda Stern, Renny Harlin Dir: Hugh Wilson DUDLEY DO-RIGHT Universal Pictures Prod: Warren Carr, Kathy Zimmer Dir: Hugh Wilson VOLCANO (Co-Editor) 20th Century Fox Prod: Neal Moritz, Scott Stuber, Andrew Davis Dir: Mick Jackson CHAIN REACTION 20th Century Fox Prod: Erwin Stoff, Richard Zanuck, Dir: Andrew Davis (Co-Editor) Andrew Davis, Maher Ahmad STEAL BIG, STEAL LITTLE 20th Century Fox Prod: Fred Caruso, Maher Ahmad, Dir: Andrew Davis (Co-Editor) Mel Pearl THE WALKING DEAD Savoy Pictures Prod: Bill Carraro, Lee Rafner Dir: Preston A. Whitmore III (Co-Editor) ON DEADLY GROUND Warner Brothers Prod: Jeffrey Robinov, Steven Seagal, Dir: Steven Seagal (Co-Editor) Robin D’Arcy THE FUGITIVE (Co-Editor) Warner Brothers Prod: Roy Huggins, Arnold Kopelson Dir: Andrew Davis UNDER SIEGE Warner Brothers Prod: Jack Bernstein, Steven Reuther, Dir: Andrew Davis (Co-Editor) J.F.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Twenty-Seven Years of Nominees & Winners FILM INDEPENDENT SPIRIT AWARDS
    2012 Twenty-Seven Years of Nominees & Winners FILM INDEPENDENT SPIRIT AWARDS BEST FIRST SCREENPLAY 2012 NOMINEES (Winners in bold) *Will Reiser 50/50 BEST FEATURE (Award given to the producer(s)) Mike Cahill & Brit Marling Another Earth *The Artist Thomas Langmann J.C. Chandor Margin Call 50/50 Evan Goldberg, Ben Karlin, Seth Rogen Patrick DeWitt Terri Beginners Miranda de Pencier, Lars Knudsen, Phil Johnston Cedar Rapids Leslie Urdang, Dean Vanech, Jay Van Hoy Drive Michel Litvak, John Palermo, BEST FEMALE LEAD Marc Platt, Gigi Pritzker, Adam Siegel *Michelle Williams My Week with Marilyn Take Shelter Tyler Davidson, Sophia Lin Lauren Ambrose Think of Me The Descendants Jim Burke, Alexander Payne, Jim Taylor Rachael Harris Natural Selection Adepero Oduye Pariah BEST FIRST FEATURE (Award given to the director and producer) Elizabeth Olsen Martha Marcy May Marlene *Margin Call Director: J.C. Chandor Producers: Robert Ogden Barnum, BEST MALE LEAD Michael Benaroya, Neal Dodson, Joe Jenckes, Corey Moosa, Zachary Quinto *Jean Dujardin The Artist Another Earth Director: Mike Cahill Demián Bichir A Better Life Producers: Mike Cahill, Hunter Gray, Brit Marling, Ryan Gosling Drive Nicholas Shumaker Woody Harrelson Rampart In The Family Director: Patrick Wang Michael Shannon Take Shelter Producers: Robert Tonino, Andrew van den Houten, Patrick Wang BEST SUPPORTING FEMALE Martha Marcy May Marlene Director: Sean Durkin Producers: Antonio Campos, Patrick Cunningham, *Shailene Woodley The Descendants Chris Maybach, Josh Mond Jessica Chastain Take Shelter
    [Show full text]