Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Running title: In vivo antitumor Activity of a Recombinant IL-7/IL-15
Title: In vivo antitumor Activity of a Recombinant IL-7/IL-15 Hybrid Cytokine in Mice
Yinhong Song1, 2, Yalan Liu1, Rong Hu1, Min Su1, Debra Rood1, and Laijun Lai1, 3
1 Department of Allied Health Sciences, 3 University of Connecticut Stem Cell Institute,
University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT
2 Medical College, Three Gorges University, Yichang, China
Keywords: cancer treatment, cytokines, IL-7, IL-15, mice
Correspondence: Laijun Lai, M.D., Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of
Connecticut, 1390 Storrs Road, Storrs, CT 06269, USA. Phone: (860) 486-6073; Fax: (860)
486-0534; E-mail: [email protected]
Potential Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Financial Support: This work was partly supported by a grant from the Connecticut
Biomedical Research Program (#2011-0145, to L. Lai).
Word count: 4,591; total number of figures and tables: 6
1
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Abstract
Both IL-7 and IL-15 have become important candidate immunomodulators for cancer
treatment. However, IL-7 or IL-15 used alone suffers from shortcomings, such as short serum
half-life and limited antitumor effect. We have cloned and expressed a recombinant (r)
IL-7/IL-15 fusion protein in which IL-7 and IL-15 are linked by a flexible linker. We then
compared the antitumor effect of rIL-7/IL-15 with the individual factors rIL-7 and/or rIL-15.
We show here that rIL-7/IL-15 has a higher antitumor activity than the combination of the
individual factors in both murine B16F10 melanoma and CT-26 colon cancer models. This
was associated with a significant increase in tumor infiltration of T cells, DCs and NK cells
and a decrease in regulatory T cells (Tregs). In addition, rIL-7/IL-15-treated DCs had higher
expression of costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86. The higher antitumor activity of
rIL-7/IL-15 is likely due to its longer in vivo half-life and different effects on immune cells.
Our results suggest that rIL-7/IL-15 may offer a new tool to enhance antitumor immunity and
treat cancer.
Introduction
Both IL-7 and IL-15 are the common cytokine receptor γ–chain (γc) family cytokines.
IL-7 plays a central role in the development and maintenance of T cells (1-5). The IL-7
receptor (R) consists of two subunits, the IL-7Rα and γc (1-5), the latter also being a
component of the receptors for IL-2, IL-4, IL-9, IL-15 and IL-21. IL-7Rα is expressed by T
2
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
cells and DCs, etc. (1-6). Several studies have shown that IL-7 has antitumor activity (7-12).
For example, tumor cell lines that were transfected to produce rIL-7 locally reduced
tumorigenicity in vivo, which was dependent on CD4+ or CD8+ T cells (7-9, 11). Local or
systemic administration of rIL-7 also had antitumor effects (7, 10), especially when rIL-7 was
combined with cancer vaccines (10, 12).
IL-15 induces the differentiation and proliferation of T and NK cells, enhances the
cytolytic activity of CD8+ T cells, and induces the maturation of DCs (13). The IL-15
receptor is composed of a unique α subunit (IL-15Rα), a β subunit (IL-2R/15Rβ) that is
shared with the IL-2 receptor, and the γc. IL-15 can bind to IL-15Rβ via cis- or
trans-presentation by IL-15Rα. IL-15Rβ is expressed by multiple lymphoid populations, such
as T cells, DCs, NK cells, and NKT cells, etc. (14). In vivo administration of IL-15 has
anti-tumor effects in several mouse tumor models (15-22); however, it has been shown that
administration of IL-15 alone is not optimal (13). Various combination strategies have been
explored to increase the efficacy of IL-15 immunotherapy, including coadministration of
other cytokines or inhibitory antibodies against immune-suppression molecules (17-19, 22).
These approaches produced greater anti-tumor responses than did IL-15 alone.
Because both rIL-7 and rIL-15 have a low molecular weight, they undergo a rapid renal
clearance in vivo, thereby having a short plasma half-life (23-26), which diminishes their in
vivo antitumor effects (24, 25). Linking the coding sequences of IL-15 with other proteins has
3
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
increased the IL-15’s plasma half-life. Some of the fusion proteins also increase IL-15
signaling, thereby increasing its efficacy (24, 25, 27-29).
We have previously described a single-chain rIL-7/HGFβ hybrid cytokine liking IL-7
and HGFβ by a flexible linker (30). The in vivo half-life of rIL-7/HGFβ was significantly
longer than that of rIL-7 (31). In addition, rIL-7/HGFβ has different effects on immune cells
(30-32), resulting in a higher antitumor activity (33), as compared with the individual factors
rIL-7 and/or rHGFβ. Here we sought to determine whether a single-chain recombinant hybrid
cytokine containing IL-7 and IL-15 might have a higher antitumor effect than the
combination of the individual factors rIL-7 and rIL-15.
Materials and Methods
Animals and cell lines
Murine B16F10 melanoma and CT-26 colon cancer cells were obtained from the American
Type Culture Collection and the National Cancer Institute in 2008. American Type Culture
Collection characterized the cells by using karyotyping and cytochrome c oxidase I testing.
We passaged the cells for less than 4 months before storing them in liquid nitrogen. Before
the cancer cells were injected into mice, they were cultured in Dulbecco Modified Eagle
Medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% FBS at 37℃ and 5% CO2
humidified air. Cell viability was assessed using a trypan blue exclusion dye method. Cells
with a viability >95% were resuspended in PBS for injection. BALB/c, C57BL/6 mice,
4
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
homozygous C57BL/6 IFN-γ null mice (IFN-γ-/-), and homozygous TNF-α null mice
(TNF-α-/-) were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Mice were housed,
treated, and handled in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care
and Use Committee of the University of Connecticut.
Construction, expression and purification of human single-chain IL-7/IL-15 hybrid
cytokine.
The human IL-7/IL-15 gene was constructed by adapting a protocol we previously used
to construct the human IL-7/HGFα gene (32). Briefly, the human IL-7 cDNA was amplified
with primers A [(that contains a secret sequence (SS)] and B, and the human IL-15 cDNA
with primer C and D (Supplemental Table 1). The PCR products of IL-7 and IL-15 were
combined and subjected to an additional round of PCR with primers A and D. Because
primers B and C contained the linker sequence encoding (Gly4Ser)2, the IL-7 and IL-15 genes
(IL-7/IL-15) were connected by a flexible linker after the overlap extension PCR. The
IL-7/IL-15 gene was then cloned into a pOptiVEC mammalian expression vector (Invitrogen)
(Figure 1A) that was then transfected into Chinese hamster ovary cell-derived DG44 cells
(Invitrogen) to produce rIL-7/IL-15 protein.
rIL-7/IL-15 protein was then purified from the supernatant of the transfected DG44 cells.
Briefly, the supernatant was concentrated by a prep/scale–tangential flow filter cartridge with
10 kDa molecular weight cut-off (Millipore, Bedford, MA) and diafiltered into washing
buffer. The sample was then applied to serially linked columns of CM and DEAE sepharose
5
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
(GE Health Care Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ); after washing, the linked columns were
separated. rIL-7/IL-15 protein was eluted from the DEAE column in the washing buffer
containing NaCl gradient, and further purified by a gel filtration column (16/60 Sephacryl
S-100 high resolution, GE). The purified protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western
blotting using antibodies against human IL-7 and IL-15. For controls, we also cloned and
expressed human IL-7 (32) or IL-15 (using primers E and D) gene individually, and purified
rIL-7 and rIL-15 proteins from the expression system, respectively.
Evaluation of local tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis
To induce localized tumors, 1×105 B16F10 melanoma cells or 2×105 CT-26 colon cancer
cells were injected s. c. into the flank of syngeneic C57BL/6 or BALB/c mice, respectively.
The indicated doses of rIL-7/IL-15, rIL-7, and/or rIL-15 (or PBS) were then injected into the
tumor injection site at 2-day intervals over the indicated time period. Tumor size (volume)
was determined every other day by caliper measurements of the shortest (A) and longest (B)
diameter, using the formula V = (A2B)/2. Some mice were also injected i.p. with 450 µg
anti-IL-7Rα antibody (clone A7R34) (31), 200 µg anti-IL-15Rβ antibody (clone TMβ1, from
Biolegend), or isotype controls (31, 34) 1 day before the cytokine injection.
For in vivo cell depletions (CD8 T cells, CD4 T cells, or NK cells), mice received the
following antibodies via i.p. injections: anti-CD8 (clone 2.43, from BioXCell), 500
µg/injection; anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5), 200 µg/injection; or anti-NK1.1 (clone PK136), 300
µg/injection on days -3, -1, and +4 of the cancer cell injection (35). Depletions were
6
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
confirmed by flow cytometry analysis of blood samples.
To induce pulmonary metastases, 1×105 B16F10 melanoma cells were injected into the
tail vein of syngeneic mice, and rIL-7/15, rIL-7 and rIL15 or PBS were injected i.v. at 2-day
intervals from days 2 to 12. The animals were euthanized at the indicated times after tumor
inoculation. Metastatic tumor nodules in the subpleural regions of the lungs were counted
under a dissecting microscope.
Confocal Microscopy
Frozen sections of tumor tissue were prepared as described (36). The sections were
stained with antibodies including PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD11c, APC-conjugated
anti-mouse CD4, and FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD8 or FITC-conjugated anti-mouse
NK1.1 (BioLegend, or BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). All of the sections were then
counterstained with 4’, 6’-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma) and observed under a
Nikon A1R Spectral Confocal microscope (Nikon, Kanagawa, Japan). A minimum of 6
sections from each tumor tissue were used to evaluate CD4+, CD8+, CD11c+ and NK1.1+
cells.
Flow cytometry
Single-cell suspensions of tumor tissues and spleen cells were stained with one or more
of the following fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies: CD3, CD4, CD8, CD25, FoxP3,
CD11c, CD80, CD86, NK1.1, IFN-γ and TNF-α (BioLegend, or BD Biosciences, San Jose,
7
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
CA, or eBioscience, San Diego, CA). For intracellular staining, cells were labeled with cell
surface antibodies, permeabilized with a Cytofix/Cytoperm solution (BD Biosciences), and
then stained with anti-FoxP3, IFN-γ or TNF-α antibody. The samples were analyzed on a
FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), and data analysis was performed using
FlowJo software (Ashland, OR).
Evaluation of T cells producing IFN-γ or TNF-α
Splenocytes were treated with red blood cells lysis buffer, washed, and cultured with
irradiated CT-26 colon cancer cells (1×105/well) or B16F10 melanoma cells (0.5×105/well)
for 2 days. Suspended cells were collected, stained with antibodies against CD4, CD8, and
IFN-γ or TNF-α, and analyzed by flow cytometry.
ELISA for detection of IL-7, IL-15 and rIL-7/IL-15
The concentration of IL-7, IL-15 and rIL-7/IL-15 in serum was determined by Human
IL-7 ELISA™ Kit (abcam, Cambridge, MA) and IL-15 ELISA Ready-DET-Go kit
(eBioscience) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The serum half-life of the
cytokines was calculated as described (31).
Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) assay
The endotoxin level in purified proteins was determined by the endpoint chromogenic
LAL test according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Lonza, Walkersville, MD).
8
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Statistical analysis
Student’s two-tailed unpaired t test was used for comparisons between two groups, and
one-way ANOVA for more than two groups. The results were considered significantly
different at p<0.05.
Results
1. Expression and purification of human single-chain rIL-7/IL-15 protein
We have successfully constructed the human IL-7/IL-15 gene in which the IL-7 and IL-15
cDNAs were connected by a flexible linker (Figure 1A). The IL-7/IL-15 gene was transfected
and expressed in the pOptiVEC/DG44 mammalian expression system, and rIL-7/IL-15
protein was then purified by ion exchanges and gel filtration. As shown in Figure 1B, a
relatively high purity of rIL-7/IL-15 protein was obtained, as determined by Coomassie
blue-stained SDS-PAGE (lane 2). The identity of the protein was verified by Western blot
using IL-7 and IL-15 antibodies (lane 3 and lane 4). The actual molecular weight (MW) of
the rIL-7/IL-15 was higher than the predicted MW, suggesting that the recombinant protein
was glycosylated. The endotoxin level was less than 0.01 EU/ml of 1 µg of purified
rIL-7/IL-15. In vitro assays show that rIL-7/IL-15 had a slightly lower activity than
equimolar amounts of unfused rIL-7 and rIL-15 in stimulating the proliferation of responding
lymphocytes (Supplemental Figure 1), probably because the fusion affects the binding of
rIL-7/IL-15 to its receptors. 9
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
2. In vivo administration of rIL-7/IL-15 inhibits local tumor growth
To determine the antitumor activity of rIL-7/IL-15, B16F10 melanoma cells were
injected s.c. into the flank of syngeneic C57BL/6 mice. The mice were then injected at the
tumor site with different doses of rIL-7/IL-15 (2.5, 5, 10 and 20 μg/injection) or control
vehicle (PBS) at 2-day intervals from days 2-12. Tumor volumes in each group were
measured over time and compared statistically. As shown in Figure 2A, tumor growth was
inhibited by rIL-7/IL-15 in a dose-responsive manner, with about 60% inhibition at the
2.5-μg level and greater than 80% inhibition at the 20-μg level.
To compare the antitumor effect of rIL-7/IL-15 with its component cytokines, C57BL/6
mice injected with B16F10 melanoma cells were treated with equimolar amounts of
rIL-7/IL-15 (20 μg/injection), rIL-7 (11.6 μg/injection) and/or rIL-15 (8.4 μg/injection),
according to the above schedule. As shown in Figure 2B, although individual factors rIL-7
and/or rIL-15 inhibited local tumor growth, the single-chain rIL-7/IL-15 hybrid cytokine had
significantly higher antitumor activity than rIL-7 and/or rIL-15.
To test whether the anti-tumor effect of rIL-7/IL-15 is mediated by both IL-7 and
IL-15, some of the mice were also injected IL-7 or IL-15 receptor-blocking antibody
(anti-IL-7Rα or anti-IL-15Rβ antibody), or isotype control. As shown in Figure 2C, either
IL-7 or IL-15 receptor-blocking antibody partly abolished the antitumor activity of
10
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
rIL-7/IL-15. The data suggest that the anti-tumor effect is IL-7 and IL-15-specific.
To determine if rIL-7/IL-15 has an antitumor effect on other cancers, BALB/c mice
were injected s.c. with murine CT-26 colon cancer cells, then injected at the tumor site with
equimolar amounts of rIL-7/IL-15 (20 μg/injection), rIL-7 (11.6 μg/injection) and/or rIL-15
(8.4 μg/injection) at 2-day intervals from days 2-20. Again, rIL-7/IL-15 had a higher
antitumor activity than rIL-7 and/or rIL-15 (Figure 2D).
To determine whether rIL-7/IL-15, rIL-7 and/or rIL-15 directly affect the growth of
tumor cells, CT-26 colon and B16F10 melanoma cancer cells were cultured in vitro for 2 to 7
days in the presence of 20 to150 ng/ml rIL-7/IL-15, rIL-7 and/or rIL-15, or PBS. The rate of
tumor cell growth was not significantly different at any dose level of rIL-7/IL-15 from those
observed in cultures containing PBS, or rIL-7 and/or rIL-15 (Supplemental Figure 2). Hence,
the mechanism by which rIL-7/IL-15 inhibits the growth of B16F10 melanoma or CT-26
colon cancer in vivo would not appear to involve direct cytotoxic or cytostatic activities.
3. rIL-7/IL-15 induces significant infiltration of T cells, NK cells, NKT cells and DCs,
but decreases infiltration of Tregs into the tumors
To determine the mechanisms by which rIL-7/IL-15 has antitumor activity, we assessed
the percentage of immune cells in tumor tissues. On day 14, after B16F10 cancer cell
inoculation, single-cell suspensions of tumor tissues from mice treated with equimolar
11
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
amounts of rIL-7/IL-15, rIL-7 and/or rIL-15 (Figure 2B) were analyzed for CD4+ and CD8+ T
cells, CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs, CD3-NK1.1+ NK cells, CD3+NK1.1+ NKT cells and CD11c+
DCs by flow cytometry. As shown in Figure 3A and B, rIL-7 increased the tumor infiltration
of both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, while rIL-15 increased the percentage of CD8+ T cells, but
not that of CD4+ T cells. The combination of rIL-7 and rIL-15 significantly increased the
percentage both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. However, rIL-7/IL-15 hybrid cytokine had higher
activity than rIL-7 and/or rIL-15 (Figure 3A, B).
Because Tregs can inhibit immune functions and enhance the growth of cancer cells in
vivo (37), we determined whether rIL-7/IL-15 treatment affected the immune suppressive
cells in tumors. rIL-7 and/or rIL-15 did not significantly affect infiltration of
CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs in the tumors (Figure 3A). In contrast, rIL-7/IL-15 treatment
significantly reduced the percentage of Tregs (Figure 3A).
Similar to the effect on CD8+ T cells, rIL-7 and/or rIL-15 increased tumor infiltration of
NK cells and NKT cells, and rIL-7/IL-15 had a higher activity than the individual factors
rIL-7 and/or rIL-15 on NK cells (Figure 3A, C). However, rIL-7/IL-15 did not have a higher
activity than rIL-7 and rIL-15 on NKT cells (Figure 3A, C).
Because DCs play a critical role in the activation of T cells, we analyzed CD11c+ DCs in
the tumors. As shown in Figure 3A, rIL-7 did not significantly affect tumor infiltration of
DCs. In contrast, rIL-15 increased the percentage of DCs in the tumors. rIL-7/IL-15 had a
12
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
higher effect in the tumor infiltration of DCs than rIL-15 used alone or mixed with rIL-7
(Figure 3A). We also examined the expression of CD80 and CD86 on the DCs. Again, rIL-7
did not significantly affect DCs, and rIL-15 increased the expression of CD80 and CD86 on
the DCs. rIL-7/IL-15 treatment resulted in a higher expression of CD80 and CD86 than
rIL-15 used alone or mixed with rIL-7 (Figure 3D), indicating that the DCs had undergone
activation and maturation after rIL-7/IL-15 treatment.
The increased infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, DCs, and NK cells in the
rIL-7/IL-15-treated tumors was confirmed by confocal microscopic observations (Figure 3E,
F).
In addition to the tumors themselves, there was a parallel increase in the numbers of
CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, NK cells and activated DCs, and a decrease in the number of Tregs
in the spleen of the rIL-7/IL-15-treated melanoma-bearing mice (Supplemental Figure 3).
To determine whether CD4 and CD8 T cells, and NK cells mediated the antitumor
activity, some of the B16F10 bearing-mice were also injected with anti-CD8, anti-CD4, or
anti-NK1.1 antibody. As shown in Figure 3G, depletion of CD4 or CD8 T cells, or NK cells
partly abrogated the antitumor effect. The data suggest that CD4 and CD8 T cells, and NK
cells mediated the antitumor activity of rIL-7/IL-15.
4. rIL-7/IL-15 induces a tumor-specific immunological response
13
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
To determine whether a tumor-specific immunological response has been generated, we
examined the percentage of IFN-γ-producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from the spleens of
cytokine-treated tumor-bearing mice after in vitro stimulation with homologous or
heterologous tumor cells. To this end, single cell suspensions from the spleens of day 22,
cytokine-treated, CT-26 colon cancer-bearing mice were stimulated with CT-26 cells. Cells
stimulated with B16F10 melanoma cells served as specificity controls. Two days after the
stimulation, the percentage of IFN-γ or TNF-α producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were
analyzed by flow cytometry.
As shown in Figure 4A-C, the percentages of IFN-γ producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
among the cultured splenocytes from rIL-7 and/or rIL-15-treated mice were 2.3 to 3.7- and
1.5 to 1.7-fold, respectively, higher than those from PBS-treated mice after stimulation with
CT-26 cells. In contrast, the percentages of IFN-γ producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells among
the cultured splenocytes from rIL-7/IL-15-treated mice were elevated 8- and 2.3-fold,
respectively. We also analyzed the percentage of TNF-α producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
among the cultured splenocytes from the cytokine-treated mice. The percentages of TNF-α
producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from rIL-7/IL-15-treated mice were also significantly
higher than those of the T cells from rIL-7 and/or rIL-15-treated mice (Figure 4D-F). These
results suggest rIL-7/IL-15-treatment greatly enhances systemic immunological responses to
tumor-specific antigens in vivo.
14
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
To determine whether IFN-γ and TNF-α play a role in the antitumor effects of
rIL-7/IL-15, IFN-γ-/- or TNF-α-/- mice were used as the recipients for B15F10 melanoma cells.
As shown in Figure 4G and 4H, rIL-7/IL-15 treatment resulted in less than 40% tumor
growth inhibition in IFN-γ-/- or TNF-α-/- mice. As compared with more than 85% tumor
inhibition in the wild-type mice (Figure 2B, D), the data suggest that IFN-γ and TNF-α play a
role in the antitumor effect of rIL-7/IL-15.
5. rIL-7/IL-15 inhibits pulmonary metastases of melanoma and colon cancer
Having established that rIL-7/IL-15 inhibited local tumor growth, we wanted to assess
whether rIL-7/IL-15 could also inhibit metastatic tumors. To this end, C57BL6 mice were
injected i.v. with B16F10 melanoma cells to establish pulmonary metastases. The mice were
then treated with equimolar doses of rIL-7/IL-15 (20 μg/injection), rIL-7 (11.6 μg/injection)
plus rIL-15 (8.4 μg/injection), or PBS at 2-day intervals from days 2-12. The mice were
euthanized on day 14 after tumor cell inoculation. The lungs were removed and weighed, and
tumor colonies on the surface of the lung were counted. rIL-7/IL-15 treatment reduced the
numbers of metastatic nodules on the lungs by approximately 8-fold, as compared with
2.7-fold after rIL-7 and rIL-15 treatment (Figure 5). Similar antimetastatic patterns were
observed in the lungs of BALB /c mice after i.v. injection of CT-26 colon cancer cells and
treated with rIL-7/IL-15, or rIL-7 plus rIL-15 (Supplemental Figure 4). These results indicate
that rIL-7/IL-15 also has higher antimetastatic activity than the combination of the individual
factors rIL-7 and rIL-15.
15
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
6. rIL-7/IL-15 has a longer serum half-life than rIL-7 and/or rIL-15
It has been shown that both rIL-7 and rIL-15 have a short serum half-life due to their low
molecular weights (23-26). Because rIL-7/IL-15 has a higher molecular weight, we reasoned
that it should have a longer half-life than rIL-7 or rIL-15. Indeed, the serum half-life of
rIL-7/IL-15 was about 6-fold or 18-fold longer than that of rIL-7 or rIL-15, respectively
(Figure 6).
Discussion
Antitumor immunotherapy is designed to stimulate the immune system to reject and
destroy cancers (13). Although either rIL-7 or rIL-15 can enhance antitumor immunity, both
cytokines have a short in vivo half-life, which limit their antitumor activity. We show here
that rIL-7/IL-15 hybrid cytokine has higher antitumor activity than the individual factors
rIL-7 and/or rIL-15 in both melanoma and colon cancer mouse models. This is related to the
higher tumor infiltration of CD4 and CD8 T cells, DCs, NK and NKT cells, the maturation of
DCs, and the inhibition of Tregs induced by rIL-7/IL-15.
It is possible the higher antitumor activity of rIL-7/IL-15 is due to its longer in vivo
half-life, broader activity and different effects on immune cells, as compared with the
individual factors rIL-7 and/or rIL-15. Either rIL-7 or rIL-15 has a low molecular weight and
16
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
can undergo a rapid renal clearance in vivo, resulting in a short serum half-life (23-26). The in
vivo half-life of rIL-7 was increased when it was administered in a liposome-encapsulated
form or as an IL-7/anti-IL-7 antibody complex (23, 38). Our previous data had also shown
that the in vivo half-life of another hybrid cytokine rIL-7/HGFβ was 7-fold greater than rIL-7
(31). Similarly, IL-15 fused with other proteins increased its in vivo half-life (24, 25, 27-29).
Consistent with these data, we show here that rIL-7/IL-15 has 6-fold and 18-fold longer in
vivo half-life than rIL-7 and rIL-15, respectively.
Our data also indicate that rIL-7/IL-15 has different effects on immune cells, as
compared with the individual factors. For example, although rIL-7 and/or rIL-15 treatment
did not significantly affect the percentage of Tregs, rIL-7/IL-15 significantly decreased the
percentage or number of Tregs in the tumors and the spleens. Our results are consistent with
previous reports that rIL-7 or rIL-15 alone has little or no effect on Tregs (13, 39-41).
Although the mechanisms by which rIL-7/IL-15 inhibits Tregs remain to be investigated, it is
possible that rIL-7/IL-15 cross-linked both the receptors on Tregs, which resulted in signal
cross-talk downstream of the receptors, leading to novel functional readouts, such as the
inhibition of the survival and/or growth of Tregs.
It has been reported that IL-15 has both paracrine and autocrine actions on DCs, resulting
in the maturation of DCs (41), while IL-7 maintains the immature phenotype of DCs (41, 42).
Our data show that rIL-7 treatment neither significantly affects the percentage of DCs in the
tumors, nor the expression of CD80 and CD86 by the DCs. Although rIL-15 increased both
17
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
the intratumor infiltration and the expression of CD80 and CD86 on DCs, rIL-7/IL-15 hybrid
cytokine had a higher activity than rIL-7 and/or rIL-15 on DCs in the tumors and the spleen.
NK cells are innate lymphoid cells involved in the immuno-surveillance of cancers. Our
data show that rIL-15 significantly increased NK cells in the tumors and spleen, and that
rIL-7 modestly increases NK cells. These results are consistent with previous reports that
IL-15 has a central role in the development, homeostasis, and activation of NK cells (13) and
IL-7 only plays a minor role in NK homeostasis (6, 43, 44). Again, rIL-7/IL-15 has a higher
activity than rIL-7 and/or rIL-15 on NK cells. However, although both rIL-7 and rIL-15
increased the percentage or number of NKT cells in the tumors and in the spleen, rIL-7/IL-15
did not have a higher effect than rIL-7 + rIL-15 on NKT cells.
Both IL-7 and IL-15 play an important role in the differentiation, survival and
proliferation of T cells. We have shown that rIL-7 treatment increases the percentages of both
CD4 and CD8 T cells. rIL-15 increases the percentage of CD8 T cells and only modestly
affects CD4 T cells. Although the combination of rIL-7 and rIL-15 had a synergistic effect in
increasing CD4 and CD8 T cells, rIL-7/IL-15 had a higher effect than rIL-7 + rIL-15 on CD4
and CD8 T cells.
The higher activities of rIL-7/IL-15 on DCs, NK and T cells could be due to its longer in
vivo half-life. In addition, it is possible that rIL-7/IL-15 also induced receptor cross-linking
on these cells and subsequent signal cross-talk. This might only happen in DCs, NK and T
18
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
cells, but not in NKT cells since rIL-7/IL-15 did not have a significantly higher effect on
NKT cells than rIL-7 + rIL-15.
In summary, although the precise mechanisms by which rIL-7/IL-15 has higher
antitumor effect remain to be further determined, this hybrid cytokine has the potential to be
used in enhancing antitumor immunity, thereby treating a variety of tumors.
References
1. Appasamy PM (1999) Biological and clinical implications of interleukin-7 and lymphopoiesis. Cytokines Cell. Mol. Ther. 5: 25-39. 2. Fry TJ, Mackall CL (2002) Interleukin-7: from bench to clinic. Blood. 99: 3892-904. 3. Goodwin RG, Lupton S, Schmierer A, Hjerrild KJ, Jerzy R, Clevenger W, Gillis S, Cosman D, Namen AE (1989) Human interleukin 7: molecular cloning and growth factor activity on human and murine B-lineage cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 86: 302-6. 4. von Freeden-Jeffry U, Vieira P, Lucian LA, McNeil T, Burdach SE, Murray R (1995) Lymphopenia in interleukin (IL)-7 gene-deleted mice identifies IL-7 as a nonredundant cytokine. J. Exp. Med. 181: 1519-26. 5. Widmer MB, Morrissey PJ, Goodwin RG, Grabstein KH, Park LS, Watson JD, Kincade PW, Conlon PJ, Namen AE (1990) Lymphopoiesis and IL-7. International journal of cell cloning. 8 Suppl 1: 168-70; discussion 71-2. doi: 10.1002/stem.5530080715 6. Boyman O, Krieg C, Homann D, Sprent J (2012) Homeostatic maintenance of T cells and natural killer cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 69: 1597-608. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-0968-7 7. Andersson A, Yang SC, Huang M et al. (2009) IL-7 promotes CXCR3 ligand-dependent T cell antitumor reactivity in lung cancer. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950). 182: 6951-8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803340 8. Aoki T, Tashiro K, Miyatake S, Kinashi T, Nakano T, Oda Y, Kikuchi H, Honjo T (1992) Expression of murine interleukin 7 in a murine glioma cell line results in reduced tumorigenicity in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 89: 3850-4. 9. Hock H, Dorsch M, Diamantstein T, Blankenstein T (1991) Interleukin 7 induces CD4+ T cell-dependent tumor rejection. J. Exp. Med. 174: 1291-8. 10. Li B, VanRoey MJ, Jooss K (2007) Recombinant IL-7 enhances the potency of GM-CSF-secreting tumor cell immunotherapy. Clin. Immunol. 123: 155-65. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2007.01.002 11. Murphy WJ, Back TC, Conlon KC, Komschlies KL, Ortaldo JR, Sayers TJ, Wiltrout RH, Longo DL (1993) Antitumor effects of interleukin-7 and adoptive immunotherapy on human colon carcinoma xenografts. J. Clin. Invest. 92: 1918-24. doi: 10.1172/jci116785 12. Pellegrini M, Calzascia T, Elford AR et al. (2009) Adjuvant IL-7 antagonizes multiple cellular and molecular inhibitory networks to enhance immunotherapies. Nat. Med. 15: 528-36. doi: 10.1038/nm.1953
19
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
13. Steel JC, Waldmann TA, Morris JC (2012) Interleukin-15 biology and its therapeutic implications in cancer. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 33: 35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2011.09.004 14. Sim GC, Radvanyi L (2014) The IL-2 cytokine family in cancer immunotherapy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 25: 377-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2014.07.018 15. Munger W, DeJoy SQ, Jeyaseelan R, Sr. et al. (1995) Studies evaluating the antitumor activity and toxicity of interleukin-15, a new T cell growth factor: comparison with interleukin-2. Cell. Immunol. 165: 289-93. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1995.1216 16. Evans R, Fuller JA, Christianson G, Krupke DM, Troutt AB (1997) IL-15 mediates anti-tumor effects after cyclophosphamide injection of tumor-bearing mice and enhances adoptive immunotherapy: the potential role of NK cell subpopulations. Cell. Immunol. 179: 66-73. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1997.1132 17. Yu P, Steel JC, Zhang M, Morris JC, Waldmann TA (2010) Simultaneous blockade of multiple immune system inhibitory checkpoints enhances antitumor activity mediated by interleukin-15 in a murine metastatic colon carcinoma model. Clin. Cancer. Res. 16: 6019-28. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-1966 18. Zeng R, Spolski R, Finkelstein SE et al. (2005) Synergy of IL-21 and IL-15 in regulating CD8+ T cell expansion and function. J. Exp. Med. 201: 139-48. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041057 19. Zhang M, Yao Z, Dubois S, Ju W, Muller JR, Waldmann TA (2009) Interleukin-15 combined with an anti-CD40 antibody provides enhanced therapeutic efficacy for murine models of colon cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106: 7513-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902637106 20. Klebanoff CA, Finkelstein SE, Surman DR et al. (2004) IL-15 enhances the in vivo antitumor activity of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 101: 1969-74. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307298101 21. Kobayashi H, Dubois S, Sato N, Sabzevari H, Sakai Y, Waldmann TA, Tagaya Y (2005) Role of trans-cellular IL-15 presentation in the activation of NK cell-mediated killing, which leads to enhanced tumor immunosurveillance. Blood. 105: 721-7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-12-4187 22. Habibi M, Kmieciak M, Graham L, Morales JK, Bear HD, Manjili MH (2009) Radiofrequency thermal ablation of breast tumors combined with intralesional administration of IL-7 and IL-15 augments anti-tumor immune responses and inhibits tumor development and metastasis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 114: 423-31. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0024-3 23. Bui T, Faltynek C, Ho RJ (1994) Differential disposition of soluble and liposome-formulated human recombinant interleukin-7: effects on blood lymphocyte population in guinea pigs. Pharm Res. 11: 633-41. 24. Ochoa MC, Fioravanti J, Rodriguez I et al. (2013) Antitumor immunotherapeutic and toxic properties of an HDL-conjugated chimeric IL-15 fusion protein. Cancer Res. 73: 139-49. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-2660 25. Van den Bergh JM, Van Tendeloo VF, Smits EL (2015) Interleukin-15: new kid on the block for antitumor combination therapy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 26: 15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2014.09.001 26. Sportes C, Babb RR, Krumlauf MC et al. (2010) Phase I study of recombinant human interleukin-7 administration in subjects with refractory malignancy. Clin. Cancer. Res. 16: 727-35. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-1303 27. Chang CM, Lo CH, Shih YM, Chen Y, Wu PY, Tsuneyama K, Roffler SR, Tao MH (2010) Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with adeno-associated virus encoding interleukin-15 superagonist. Hum. Gene Ther. 21: 611-21. doi: 10.1089/hum.2009.187 28. Kaspar M, Trachsel E, Neri D (2007) The antibody-mediated targeted delivery of interleukin-15 and GM-CSF to the tumor neovasculature inhibits tumor growth and metastasis. Cancer Res. 67: 4940-8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-0283 29. Zhao DX, Li ZJ, Zhang Y et al. (2014) Enhanced antitumor immunity is elicited by adenovirus-mediated
20
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
gene transfer of CCL21 and IL-15 in murine colon carcinomas. Cell. Immunol. 289: 155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2014.03.020 30. Lai L, Zeff RA, Goldschneider I (2006) A recombinant single-chain IL-7/HGFbeta hybrid cytokine induces juxtacrine interactions of the IL-7 and HGF (c-Met) receptors and stimulates the proliferation of CFU-S12, CLPs, and pre-pro-B cells. Blood. 107: 1776-84. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-08-3470 31. Jin J, Goldschneider I, Lai L (2011) In vivo administration of the recombinant IL-7/hepatocyte growth factor beta hybrid cytokine efficiently restores thymopoiesis and naive T cell generation in lethally irradiated mice after syngeneic bone marrow transplantation. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950). 186: 1915-22. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001238 32. Lai L, Jin J, Hodio J, Goldschneider I (2011) A human recombinant IL-7/HGFalpha hybrid cytokine enhances T-cell reconstitution in mice after syngeneic bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation. 92: 516-22. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318228d766 33. Lai L, Jin J, Goldschneider I (2011) In vivo antitumor activity of a recombinant IL-7/HGFbeta hybrid cytokine in mice. Cancer Res. 71: 61-7. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-3198 34. Hannani D, Vetizou M, Enot D et al. (2015) Anticancer immunotherapy by CTLA-4 blockade: obligatory contribution of IL-2 receptors and negative prognostic impact of soluble CD25. Cell Res. 25: 208-24. doi: 10.1038/cr.2015.3 35. Nagato T, Lee YR, Harabuchi Y, Celis E (2014) Combinatorial immunotherapy of polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid and blockade of programmed death-ligand 1 induce effective CD8 T-cell responses against established tumors. Clin. Cancer. Res. 20: 1223-34. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-2781 36. Lai L, Jin J (2009) Generation of thymic epithelial cell progenitors by mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 27: 3012-20. doi: 10.1002/stem.238 37. Morales JK, Kmieciak M, Graham L, Feldmesser M, Bear HD, Manjili MH (2009) Adoptive transfer of HER2/neu-specific T cells expanded with alternating gamma chain cytokines mediate tumor regression when combined with the depletion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII. 58: 941-53. doi: 10.1007/s00262-008-0609-z 38. Boyman O, Ramsey C, Kim DM, Sprent J, Surh CD (2008) IL-7/anti-IL-7 mAb complexes restore T cell development and induce homeostatic T Cell expansion without lymphopenia. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950). 180: 7265-75. 39. Berger C, Berger M, Hackman RC, Gough M, Elliott C, Jensen MC, Riddell SR (2009) Safety and immunologic effects of IL-15 administration in nonhuman primates. Blood. 114: 2417-26. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-189266 40. Sportes C, Hakim FT, Memon SA et al. (2008) Administration of rhIL-7 in humans increases in vivo TCR repertoire diversity by preferential expansion of naive T cell subsets. J. Exp. Med. 205: 1701-14. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071681 41. Rochman Y, Spolski R, Leonard WJ (2009) New insights into the regulation of T cells by gamma(c) family cytokines. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9: 480-90. doi: 10.1038/nri2580 42. Guimond M, Veenstra RG, Grindler DJ et al. (2009) Interleukin 7 signaling in dendritic cells regulates the homeostatic proliferation and niche size of CD4+ T cells. Nat. Immunol. 10: 149-57. doi: 10.1038/ni.1695 43. Ranson T, Vosshenrich CA, Corcuff E, Richard O, Muller W, Di Santo JP (2003) IL-15 is an essential mediator of peripheral NK-cell homeostasis. Blood. 101: 4887-93. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3392 44. Vosshenrich CA, Ranson T, Samson SI, Corcuff E, Colucci F, Rosmaraki EE, Di Santo JP (2005) Roles for common cytokine receptor gamma-chain-dependent cytokines in the generation, differentiation, and maturation of NK cell precursors and peripheral NK cells in vivo. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950).
21
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
174: 1213-21.
FIGURE LEGENDS
Figure 1. Strategy for molecular cloning of IL-7/IL-15 and characterization of purified
rIL-7/IL-15 protein. (A) IL-7, linker, and IL-15 cDNAs were constructed by overlapping PCR.
IL-7/IL-15 cDNA was then ligated into the pOptiVEC vector. (B) Lane 1) MW markers; L2)
Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE; L3) Western blot with anti-human IL-7 antibody; L4)
Western blot with anti-human IL-15 antibody.
Figure 2. rIL-7/IL-15 inhibits the growth of localized melanoma and colon cancer. (A-C)
C57BL/6 mice were injected s.c. with 1×105 B16F10 melanoma cells followed by
intratumoral injections with (A) rIL-7/IL-15 (2.5, 5, 10, or 20 mg) or PBS, (B) equimolar
doses of rIL-7/IL-15 (20 μg), rIL-7 (11.6 µg) and/or rIL-15 (8.4 µg) or PBS at 2-day intervals
between days 2 to 12 after tumor inoculation, or (C) anti-IL-7Rα antibody, anti-IL-15Rβ
antibody, or isotype control on day 1, and rIL-7/IL-15 (20 μg) or PBS at 2-day intervals
between days 2 to 12 after tumor inoculation. (D) BALB/c mice were injected s.c. with 2×105
CT-26 colon cancer cells, followed by intratumoral injections with rIL-7/IL-15 (20 μg), rIL-7
(11.6 µg) and/or rIL-15 (8.4 µg) or PBS at 2-day intervals between days 2 to 20 after tumor
inoculation. Tumors were measured every other day. The mean tumor volume (mm3) ± SD at
the indicated time points is shown. These data are representative of 2 independent
experiments with 3-5 mice per group with similar results. 22
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Figure 3. Treatment of localized tumors with rIL-7/15 increases the percentages of CD4+ and
CD8+ T cells, NK, NKT cells, and DCs, but decreases the percentages of Tregs in the tumors.
(A-F) C57BL/6 were injected s.c. with B16F10 melanoma cells and treated with equimolar
doses of rIL-7/IL-15, rIL-7 and/or rIL-15 as in Figure 2B. Fourteen days after tumor
inoculation, the tumors were harvested. (A-D) Single-cell suspensions of tumor tissues were
analyzed for immune cells by flow cytometry. (A) The percentages of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells,
CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs, CD3-NK1.1+ NK cells, CD3+NK1.1+ NKT cells, and CD11+ DCs.
(B, C) Representative flow cytometric profiles showing the percentage of (B) CD4+CD8- and
CD4-CD8+ T cells and (C) CD3-NK1.1+ NK cells and CD3+NK1.1+ NKT cells in the
rIL-7/IL-15-treated tumors. (D) Relative fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD80 and CD86 on
the DCs. The mean ± SD is shown. These data are representative of 2 independent
experiments with 5 mice per group with similar results. * P < 0.05 as compared with the
PBS-treated group; ** P < 0.05 as compared with the rIL-7 + rIL-15-treated groups. (E, F)
Tumor sections were analyzed for presence of (E) CD11c+ cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells
and (F) NK1.1+ cells by immunofluorescence. (E) DAPI (blue), CD11c+ (red), CD4+ (yellow),
and CD8+ (green). (F) DAPI (blue) and NK1.1+ (green). Original magnification: 200×.
Representative tumor sections are shown. (G) C57BL/6 were injected s.c. with B16F10
melanoma cells and treated with rIL-7/IL-15 or PBS as in Figure 2B. The mice were also
injected i.p. with anti-CD8, anti-CD4, or anti-NK1.1 on days -3, -1, and +4 of the cancer cell
injection. The mean tumor volume (mm3) ± SD at the indicated time points is shown. These
data are representative of 2 independent experiments with 3-5 mice per group with similar
23
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
results.
Figure 4. rIL-7/IL-15 treatment results in tumor specific T cell responses. (A-F) BALB/c
mice were injected s.c. with CT-26 colon cancer cells and treated with equimolar doses of
rIL-7/IL-15, rIL-7 and/or rIL-15 as in Figure 2D. Twenty-two days after tumor inoculation,
splenocytes were cocultured with irradiated CT-26 colon cancer cells or B16F10 melanoma
cells at 37 ℃ for 2 days. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that produce IFN-γ- or TNF-α were analyzed
by flow cytometry. (A) Representative flow cytometric profiles showing the percentage of T
cells in splenocytes and the percentage of IFN-γ-producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Mean +
SD of the percentage of IFN-γ-producing (B) CD4+ and (C) CD8+ T cells. (D) Representative
flow cytometric profiles showing the percentage of T cells in splenocytes and the percentage
of TNF-α-producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Mean + SD of the percentage of
TNF-α-producing (E) CD4+ and (F) CD8+ T-cells. (G, H) IFN-γ-/- or TNF-α-/- and their
wild-type mice were injected s.c. with B16F10 melanoma cells and treated with rIL-7/IL-15
or PBS as in Figure 2B. The mean tumor volume (mm3) ± SD at the indicated time points is
shown. These data are representative of 2 independent experiments with 3-5 mice per group
with similar results. *P<0.05 or **P < 0.01 as compared with the B16F10-treated groups.
#P<0.05 as compared with the rIL-7 + rIL-15-treated groups.
Figure 5. rIL-7/15 inhibits the formation of pulmonary metastases by melanoma cells.
C57BL/6 mice were injected i.v. with 1×105 B16F10 cells, followed by i.v. injections with
24
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
equimolar doses of rIL-7/IL-15 (20 µg), rIL-7 (11.6 µg) and rIL-15 (8.4 µg) or PBS at 2-day
intervals between days 2 and 12. The mice were euthanized on day 14 after tumor cell
inoculation. The total tumor nodules visible at the surface of the lungs were counted under a
dissecting microscope. These data are representative of 2 independent experiments, with 5
mice per group, ** P < 0.01.
Figure 6. rIL-7/IL-15 has a longer serum half-life than rIL-7 or rIL-15. Mice were injected
i.p. with optimal equimolar amounts of rIL-7/IL-15 (20 µg), rIL-7 (11.6 µg), or rIL-15 (8.4
µg), and then bred over time (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 22, 44, 80, and 120 hours after
treatment). The concentration of rIL-7/IL-15, rIL-7 and rIL-15 in mouse serum was
examined by IL-7- or IL-15-specific ELISA. These data are representative of 2 independent
experiments with 3 mice per group.
25
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
In vivo antitumor Activity of a Recombinant IL-7/IL-15 Hybrid Cytokine in Mice
Yinhong Song, Yalan Liu, Rong Hu, et al.
Mol Cancer Ther Published OnlineFirst July 29, 2016.
Updated version Access the most recent version of this article at: doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111
Supplementary Access the most recent supplemental material at: Material http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/suppl/2016/07/29/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111.DC1
Author Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been Manuscript edited.
E-mail alerts Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal.
Reprints and To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Subscriptions Department at [email protected].
Permissions To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/early/2016/07/29/1535-7163.MCT-16-0111. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Rightslink site.
Downloaded from mct.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research.