Arxiv:0912.2253V2 [Hep-Th] 19 Dec 2009 ‡ † ∗ Rcsi Ellratmt 1,1,1,1,15]

arXiv:0912.2253v2 [hep-th] 19 Dec 2009 ‡ † ∗ rcsi ellratmt 1,1,1,1,15]. 14, 13, 12, [11, automata [10] non- physics cellular 5], black-hole cosmic 9], 4, or 8, [3, 7, gravity [6, quantum geometry commutative loop as [2], such quantum-gravity, foam of spacetime models many structures in Such approximating inherent are scales. at in length structures interest Planckian, coarse-grained typically of small, discrete revival with spacetime recent there the a reason this For been at [1]. has revision strength interactions in need electro-weak comparable may become and no- continuum gravitational the in a where particular, required as scales with In spacetime is fields of shift spacetime. two tion conceptual of the understanding dramatic reconcile our a to other, order each in that indicate 1 rbdwt atceaclrtr ( accelerators particle with probed ao on frnraie hoisi rcsl oex- to computa- numerical precisely from is data nu- theories a lattice-independent no- as renormalized Indeed, tract serve few of divergences. mainly point a ultraviolet they major with of 23], but regulators 22, 20], merical [21, 19, computational exceptions in [18, table lat- instance, theory Discrete for field used, quantum lattice. routinely discrete are a tices undoubtedly is physics the of set models to prospective supposed are are world. on Planckian future, or limits [16] near started important Surveyor the just various in Planck which start as [17]— to such IceCube planned as probes related speculative fact, the so In or be not seems. might it physics Planckian of sue lcrncades [email protected] address: Electronic [email protected] address: Electronic lcrncades [email protected] address: Electronic . 6 ept atgpbtentePac egh( length Planck the between gap vast a Despite physics quantum and gravitational in advances Recent n ftesmls o-oe ytm o Planckian for systems toy-model simplest the of One · 10 netit eaino ol rsa n t applications its and crystal world on relation Uncertainty − 35 )adsals eghsae htcnbe can that scales length smallest and m) ASnmes 47.y 03.65.-w a 04.70.Dy, quantization numbers: als PACS Hooft’s We ’t evaporation. with hole paradigm black crystal micro world the Hawking the of finite of end Heisen a the on both at based predicts remnant results formula standard uncerta mass-temperature to involved mass-temper contrast our new on In a bound derive part holes. we energi lower the black where Planckian any physics, In for holes pose black i.e., crystal”. not micro “world zone, does — Brillouin momenta length the and Planck of of border order the the of is 2 efruaegnrlzducranyrltosi crysta a in relations uncertainty generalized formulate We NP,CehTcnclUiest nPau,B˘rehová 1 Prague, 7, in University Technical Czech FNSPE, .INTRODUCTION I. 1 eateto hsc,Ntoa awnUiest,Taipei University, Taiwan National Physics, of Department T,FeeUiesta eln riale1 -49 Berl D-14195 14 Arnimallee Universität Berlin, Freie ITP, 3 en etrfrCsooyadPril srpyis(LeCo Astrophysics Particle and Cosmology for Center Leung erJizba, Petr ≈ 10 ,2, 1, − 18 ∗ ) h is- the m), ae Kleinert, Hagen ℓ p ≈ ecntutpsto n oetmoeaoso 1D III a Section on In operators text. momentum the and in position needed calculus construct be differential we will a that lattice of a fundamentals on some present we more interest. be academic may mere results the presented a as will the of which such that than — hoped accelerators 28] is particle 27, it in LHC, [26, en- available range at TeV shortly formed the be be as might low holes as black micro ergies view physical that In fact derive physics. the to hole of black and micro crystal to quan- world related consequences the the on with physics associated tum (GUP) principle uncertainty tran- Kosterlitz-Thousless [23]. a superfluids in two-dimensional order in the sition or- quasi-long-range to a similar of not der, behavior are typical crystal the the display world words, but the other crystalline In of the peaks distances. of large Bragg memory over the lost dis- that is the structure so of distances, long fluctuations functions at correlation elastic logarithmic the possess fields Moreover, the- placement Einstein’s in [25]. as between ory same i.e., the defects, are rotational singularities, curvature local action, assumes between elastic second-gradient one forces a the If by controlled be geometry deformations. to the elastic these i.e., structure, under invariant defect the is alter deforma- elastic not The do tions defects. translational to due torsion eetsrcueo rsa hs atc pcn sof is spacing lattice whose of the crystal order of a manifestation the Einstein-Cartan 24]. of a and being structure 23, as defect Einstein considered [20, be of can crystal” geometry spaces “world the — There, universe crystal-like on sitting network. fields the sig- of between for nodes interactions directions the the propagation carrying possible nals only the define ftkn h atc olne samr computational mere a a as as longer but no consequences device, lattice the the investigate taking however, may, of One tions. 1, h tutr forppri sflos nScinII Section In follows: as is paper our of structure The generalized the study to is note this of purpose The eetyoeo spooe oe fadiscrete, a of model a proposed us of one Recently † n ai Scardigli Fabio and s h netit eainfrposition for relation uncertainty the es, egadsrnyucranyrelations, uncertainty stringy and berg ddul pca relativity. special double nd tr eainfrShazcidmicro Schwarzschild for relation ature -ieuies hs atc spacing lattice whose universe l-like stmeaueadazr rest-mass zero a and temperature ’s reymninsm connections some mention briefly o clrcs hneege i near lie energies when case icular 51 rh ,CehRepublic Czech 1, Praha 19 15 ℓ p nis eapyorrslsto results our apply We inties. uvtr sdet oainldefects, rotational to due is Curvature . bona-fide n Germany in, 0,Taiwan 106, omcobakholes black micro to 3, sPA), iceentok hs links whose network, discrete ‡ δ -function-like, 2 lattice and compute their commutator. We then demon- where x runs over all xn. strate that the usual Weyl-Heisenberg algebra W1 forp ˆ For periodic functions on the lattice or for functions andx ˆ operators is on a 1D lattice deformed to the Eu- vanishing at the boundary of the world crystal, the lat- clidean algebra E(2). By identifying the measure of un- tice derivatives can be subjected to the lattice version of certainty with a standard deviation we derive the related integration by parts: GUP on a lattice. This is done in Section IV. There we focus on two critical regimes: long-wave regime and f(x) g(x) = g(x) ¯ f(x) , (4) ∇ − ∇ the regime where momenta are at the border of the first x x X X Brillouin zone. Interestingly enough, our GUP implies f(x) ¯ g(x) = g(x) f(x) . (5) that quantum physics of the world-crystal universe be- ∇ − ∇ x x comes “deterministic” for energies near the border of the X X Brillouin zone. In view of applications to micro black One can also define the lattice Laplacian as hole physics, we derive in Section V the energy-position 1 GUP for a photon. Implications for micro black holes ¯ f(x)= ¯ f(x)= [f(x+ǫ) 2f(x)+f(x ǫ)] , (6) physics are discussed in Section VI. There we derive a ∇∇ ∇∇ ǫ2 − − mass-temperature relation for Schwarzschild micro black which reduces in the continuum limit to an ordinary holes. On the phenomenological side, the latter pro- Laplace operator ∂2. Note that the lattice Laplacian can vides a nice resolution of a long-standing puzzle: the final x also be expressed in terms of the difference of the two Hawking temperature of a decaying micro black hole re- lattice derivatives: mains finite, in contrast to the infinite temperature of the standard result where Heisenberg’s uncertainty prin- 1 ¯ f(x) = f(x) ¯ f(x) . (7) ciple operates. Besides, the final mass of the evaporation ∇∇ ǫ ∇ − ∇ process is zero, thus avoiding the problems caused by the existence of massive black hole remnants. Entropy and The above calculus can be easily extended to any num- heat capacity are discussed in Section VII. Finally, in ber D of dimensions [18, 19, 23]. Section VIII we outline a connection of our results with ’t Hooft’s approach to deterministic quantum mechanics and with deformed (or double) special relativity. Sec- III. POSITION AND MOMENTUM OPERATORS ON A LATTICE tion IX is devoted to concluding remarks. For complete- ness, we present in Appendix an alternative derivation of the micro black hole mass-temperature formula. Consider now the quantum mechanics (QM) on a 1D lattice in a Schrödinger-like picture. Wave function are square-integrable complex functions on the lattice, where II. DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS ON A “integration” means here summation, and scalar prod- LATTICE ucts are defined by

∗ In this section we quickly review some features of a f g = ǫ f (x)g(x) . (8) h | i x differential calculus on a 1D lattice. An overview dis- X cussing more aspects of such a calculus can be found, e.g., in Refs. [18, 19, 20]. Independent and very elegant It follows from Eq. (4) that derivation of these can be also done in the framework of f g = ¯ f g , (9) a non-commutative geometry [29, 30, 31]. h |∇ i −h∇ | i On a lattice of spacing ǫ in one dimension, the lattice so that (i )† = i ¯ , and neither i nor i ¯ are hermitian sites lie at xn = nǫ where n runs through all integer operators.∇ The lattice∇ Laplacian∇ (6), however,∇ is hermi- numbers. There are two fundamental derivatives of a tian. function f(x): The position operator Xˆǫ acting on wave functions of 1 x is defined by a simple multiplication with x: ( f)(x) = [f(x + ǫ) f(x)] , ∇ ǫ − ˆ 1 (Xǫf)(x) = xf(x) . (10) ( ¯ f)(x) = [f(x) f(x ǫ)] . (1) ǫ ∇ − − Similarly we can define the lattice momentum operator They obey the generalized Leibnitz rule Pˆǫ. In order to ensure hermiticity we should relate it to ( fg)(x) = ( f)(x)g(x)+ f(x + ǫ)( g)(x) , the symmetric lattice derivative [19, 30, 32]. Using (9) ∇ ∇ ∇ ( ¯ fg)(x) = ( ¯ f)(x)g(x)+ f(x ǫ)( ¯ g)(x) . (2) we have ∇ ∇ − ∇ ~ On a lattice, integration is performed as a summation: (Pˆ f)(x) = [( f)(x) + ( ¯ f)(x)] ǫ 2i ∇ ∇ dx f(x) ǫ f(x) , (3) ~ ≡ = [f(x + ǫ) f(x ǫ)] . (11) x 2iǫ Z X − − 3

For small ǫ, this reduces to the ordinary momentum op- With the help of (21) we can rewrite the commutation eratorp ˆ i~∂ , or more precisely relation (13) equivalently as ≡− x Pˆ =p ˆ + (ǫ2) . (12) ˆ ˆ ~ ~ ǫ O [Xǫ, Pǫ]f (x) = i cos(ǫp/ˆ ) f(x) . (22) The “canonical” commutator between Xˆ and Pˆ on the ǫ ǫ The latter allows to identify the lattice unit operator Iˆ lattice reads ǫ with cos (ǫp/ˆ ~). Indeed, Iˆǫ = 1ˆ1 on all lattice nodes. i~ [Xˆ , Pˆ ]f (x) = [f(x + ǫ)+ f(x ǫ)] ǫ ǫ 2 − IV. UNCERTAINTY RELATIONS ON LATTICE i~(Iˆ f)(x) . (13) ≡ ǫ The last line defines a lattice-version of the unit operator We are now prepared to derive the generalized uncer- as the average over the two neighboring sites. Note that tainty relation implied by the previous commutators. We all three operators Xˆǫ, Pˆǫ, and Iˆǫ are hermitian under the shall define the uncertainty of an observable A in a state scalar product (8). ψ by the standard deviation It was noted in [32] that the operators Xˆǫ, Pˆǫ and 2 Iˆ generate the Euclidean algebra E(2) in 2D. Indeed, (∆A)ψ ψ (Aˆ ψ Aˆ ψ ) ψ . (23) ǫ ≡ h | − h | | i | i setting Mˆ = ǫXˆǫ, Pˆ1 = ǫPˆǫ/~ and Pˆ2 = Iˆǫ we obtain q Following the conventional Robertson-Schrödinger proce- dure (see, e.g., Ref. [33, 34, 35]), we derive on the space- [M,ˆ Pˆ1] = iPˆ2 , [M,ˆ Pˆ2] = iPˆ1 , [Pˆ1, Pˆ2] = 0 . − time lattice the inequality

The generator Mˆ corresponds to a rotation, while Pˆ1 ~ 1 ˆ ˆ ˆ and Pˆ2 represent two translations. In the limit ǫ 0, (∆Xǫ)ψ(∆Pǫ)ψ ψ [Xǫ, Pǫ] ψ = ψ Iǫ ψ → ≥ 2 h | | i 2 h | | i the Lie algebra of E(2) contracts to the standard Weyl- ~ Heisenberg algebra W : Xˆ xˆ, Pˆ pˆ, Iˆ 1ˆ1. Thus = ψ cos(ǫp/ˆ ~) ψ . (24) 1 ǫ ǫ ǫ 2 |h | | i| ordinary QM is obtained from→ lattice→ QM by→ a contraction of the E(2) algebra, with the lattice spacing ǫ playing For brevity we will omit in the following the subscript ψ the role of the deformation parameter. in (∆A)ψ and set ψ ψ ψ. All functions on the lattice can be Fourier-decomposed Let us now studyh two| · · · critical | i≡h···i regimes of the GUP (24): with wave numbers in the Brillouin zone: the first is the long-wavelengths regime where pˆ ψ 0; the second regime is near the boundary of theh Brillouini → π/ǫ dk ~ f(x) = f˜(k)eikx , (14) zone where pˆ ψ π /2ǫ. To this end we first rewrite 2π cos(ǫp/ˆ ~) h asi → Z−π/ǫ h iψ ∞ with the coefficients ∞ (ǫp/~)2n cos(ǫp/ˆ ~) = dp ̺(p) ( 1)n , (25) h iψ − (2n)! ˜ −ikx n=0 0 f(k) = ǫ f(x)e . (15) X Z x X where ̺(p) ψ(p) 2. ≡ | | This implies the good-old de Broglie relation In the first case, ̺(p) is peaked around p 0, so that the relation (25) becomes approximately ≃ (ˆpf˜)(k) = ~kf˜(k) , (16) ǫ2p2 cos(ǫp/ˆ ~) = 1 + (p4) , (26) and its lattice version h iψ − 2 ~2 O 2 2 ( i f˜)(k) = Kf˜(k), ( i ¯ f˜)(k) = K¯ f˜(k) , (17) where p pˆ ψ. We should stress that expansion (26) − ∇ − ∇ is not an≡ expansion h i in ǫ but rather in ǫp/~. So if we with the eigenvalues speak of ̺(p) as being peaked around p 0 we mean that p ~/ǫ. ≃ K (eikǫ 1)/iǫ = K¯ ∗ . (18) ≪ ≡ − Applying now the identity From (17) we find the Fourier transforms of the operators Aˆ2 = (∆A)2 + Aˆ 2 , (27) h iψ h iψ Xˆǫ, Pˆǫ, Iˆǫ: we obtain from (24) ˆ ˜ d ˜ (Xǫf)(k) = i f(k) , (19) ~ ǫ2p2 dk ∆X ∆P & 1 ~ ǫ ǫ 2 − 2~2 (Pˆ f˜)(k) = sin(kǫ)f˜(k) , (20) ǫ ~ 2 ǫ ǫ 2 2 ˆ ˜ ˜ = 1 2 (∆ p) + pˆ ψ . (28) (Iǫf)(k) = cos(kǫ)f(k) . (21) 2 − 2~ h i

For mirror-symmetric states where pˆ ψ = 0 this implies which will be needed in the following. Here ε(...) is the h i sign function, and ~ ǫ2 ∆X ∆P & 1 (∆p)2 . (29) ǫ ǫ ~2 D 2 2 − 2 sin(ǫj pˆj /~) Pˆ = ~ . (35) | ǫ| v ǫj Here we have substituted ... by (...) since we assume uj=1 | | uX that ǫ ℓp (Planckian lattice) and that ∆p is close t to zero≃ (this is our original assumption). Therefore Inequality (34) should be contrasted with inequality (24) ǫ2(∆p)2/2~2 1. where the momentum is without an absolute value. For Planckian≪ lattices with the relation (12), we can In a particular case when states ψ are a combination neglect higher powers of ǫ in (29) and write of only positive or only negative momentum eigenstates (e.g., incident or reflected particle states) we can simply ~ 2 ǫ 2 write ∆Xǫ∆Pǫ & 1 (∆Pǫ) . (30) 2 − 2~2 ~ i i i ∆X ∆ Pǫ ψ cos ǫ pˆ /~ ψ In the second case, where pˆ ~π/2ǫ, i.e. near the ǫ | | ≥ 2 |h | | i| h iψ → border of the Brillouin zone, we use the expansion: ~ = 1 2 sin2 ǫipî/2~ . (36) cos[π/2 + (ǫp/ˆ ~ π/2)] = sin(π/2 ǫp/ˆ ~) 2 − ψ h − iψ h − iψ ∞ ∞ 2n+1 h i (π/2 ǫp/~) = dp ̺(p) ( 1)n − . (31) − (2n + 1)! V. IMPLICATIONS FOR PHOTONS n=0 0 X Z Under the assumption that ̺(p) is peaked near the border We may now use the inequality (36) to derive the GUP of the Brillouin zone, the first term in the expansion is for photons. dominant, and the uncertainty relation reduces to The vector potential of a photon in the Lorentz gauge ~ π ǫ in 1 + 1 dimensions satisfies the wave equation ∆Xǫ∆Pǫ ~ pˆ ψ . (32) ≥ 2 2 − h i 1 2 µ 2 µ 2 ∂t A (x, t) = ∂x A (x, t) . (37) Since k = p/~ lies always inside the Brillouin zone, we c µ µ have pˆ ψ π~/2ǫ and can therefore in (32) substitute A plane wave solution A (x)= ǫ exp[i(kx ω(k)t)] pos- h i ≤ ... by (...). Finally, using again (12), we can write for sesses the well-known linear dispersion relation− |the| GUP close to the boundary of the Brillouin zone ω(k) = c k , (38) ~ | | π ǫ ˆ ∆Xǫ∆Pǫ & ~ Pǫ ψ . (33) with ǫµ being a polarization vector. On a one- 2 2 − h i 2 dimensional lattice, the operator ∂x is replaced by the As the momentum reaches the boundary of the Brillouin lattice Laplacian ¯ , and the spectrum becomes, on ac- zone, the right-hand sides of (32)–(33) vanish, so that lat- count of Eq. (6) and∇∇ (17), tice quantum mechanics at short wavelengths is permit- ted to exhibit classical behavior — no irreducible lower ω(k) 2 [1 cos(kǫ)] 2 kǫ = KK¯ = − = sin , (39) bound for uncertainties of two complementary observ- c ǫ ǫ 2 p ables appears! p It is worth noting that the uncertainty relation (33) which reduces to (38) for ǫ 0. Denoting the energy on ~ → leads to the same physical conclusions as those found, on the lattice ω by Eǫ, we obtain the dispersion relation a different ground, by Magueijo and Smolin in Ref. [36]. Eǫ 2 pǫ In particular, the world-crystal universe can become “de- = sin . (40) ~ c ǫ 2 ~ terministic” for energies near the border of the Brillouin ˆ zone, i.e., for Planckian energies. We can also define the associated energy operator Ec by Let us remark that the scenario in which the universe replacing p byp ˆ. at Planckian energies is deterministic rather than being For states ψ with ̺(p) sharply peaked around small p, dominated by tumultuous quantum fluctuations is a re- we can use a spectral expansion analog of (25) to obtain current theme in ’t Hooft’s “deterministic” quantum me- ∆E c∆ p c∆ P . (41) chanics [37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43]. ǫ ≃ | | ≃ | ǫ| It is straightforward to generalize the above formulas Here we have neglected higher powers of momentum and to higher dimensions. In this context, a useful inequality used the fact that we deal with a Planckian lattice. In is deriving we have also applied the cumulant expansion: ~ i i i i ∆X ∆ Pǫ ψ (Pˆ / Pˆǫ )cos ǫ pˆ /~ ψ Eˆ = (2~c/ǫ) sin (ˆp ǫ/2 ~) ǫ | | ≥ 2 |h | ǫ | | | i| h ǫiψ h| |iψ ~ ǫ2p3 i i i~ = cp c + (p5) . (42) = ψ ε(ˆp )cos ǫ pˆ / ψ , (34) − 24 ~2 O 2 |h | | i|

With the help of (36), (40), and (41) we can write in the have found a black hole on the lattice as a discretized long-wavelength regime version of a Schwarzschild solution. It is a pile up of disclinations. If the Schwarzschild radius is much larger ~c ǫ2 ∆X ∆E 1 E2 . (43) than the lattice spacing ǫ, this will not look much differ- ǫ ǫ ≥ 2 − 2~2c2 h ǫ iψ ent from the well-known continuum solution. We must avoid too small black holes, for otherwise, completely 2 Here E ψ is the average quadrat of the photon energy, new physics will set in near the center, due to the high h ǫ i and thus the square root of it can be formally identified concentration of defects. These will cause the “melting” with the energy change in the detector, i.e. ∆Eǫ. From of the world crystal at a critical defect density [53], and this follows that if the uncertainty of a photon position in the emerging trans-horizon general relativity would look a state ψ is ∆Xǫ, then the energy of a detector changes completely different from Einstein’s theory. at least by amount Following the classical argument of the Heisenberg microscope [54], we know that the smallest resolvable detail ~c ǫ2 1 ∆E 1 E2 , (44) δx of an object goes roughly as the wavelength of the ǫ ≃ 2 − 2~2c2 h ǫ iψ ∆X ǫ employed photons. If E is the (average) energy of the photons used in the microscope, then per particle. Remembering the Einstein relation ∆E = 2π~c/λ, we can interpret 4π∆X as being a lattice equiv- ~c ǫ δx . (48) alent of photon’s wavelength λ. ≃ 2E It is interesting to observe that in the short-wavelength case we can deduce from the exact GUP Conversely, with the relation (48) one can compute the energy E of a photon with a given (average) wavelength ~ 2 P ǫ 2 λ δx. As a consequence of Eq. (43), we can write the ∆Xǫ∆ ǫ 1 Eǫ ψ , (45) ≃ | | ≥ 2 − 2~2c2 h i lattice version of this standard Heisenberg formula as that near the border of the Brillouin zone ∆X takes the ~c ǫ2 ǫ δX 1 (E )2 , (49) approximate form (cf. Eq. (40)) ǫ ≃ 2E − 2~2c2 ǫ ǫ 2 ǫ ǫ 2 which links the (average) wavelength of a photon to its ∆Xǫ 1 2 2 Eǫ ψ ≃ π − 2~ c h i energy Eǫ. Since the lattice spacing is ǫ = aℓp and the ǫ π ǫ Planck energy p = ~c/2ℓp, Eq. (49) can be rewritten Pˆ . (46) E ≃ π 2 − ~h ǫiψ as h i ~ 2 In the derivation we have used that fact that c a ℓpEǫ δXǫ . (50) ~ ≃ 2Eǫ − 8 p 2 π E ∆ Pǫ Pˆ . (47) | | ≤ h ǫ i ≃ 2ǫ Let us now loosely follow the argument of Refs. [44, 45, q 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51] and consider an ensemble of un- Relation (46) represents the smallest attainable posi- polarized photons of Hawking radiation just outside the tional uncertainty near the border of the Brillouin zone. event horizon. From a geometrical point of view, it’s It will be useful in the following two sections. easy to see that the position uncertainty of such photons is of the order of the Schwarzschild radius RS of the VI. APPLICATIONS TO MICRO BLACK HOLES hole. An equivalent argument comes from considering the average wavelength of the Hawking radiation, which is of the order of the geometrical size of the hole (see An interesting playground where one can apply the e.g. Ref. [49], chapter 5). By recalling that RS = ℓpm, above lattice GUP’s is the hypothetical physics of micro where m = M/Mp is the black hole mass in Planck units black holes. Their mass-temperature relation depends 2 (Mp = p/c ), we can estimate the photon positional sensitively on the actual form of the energy-position un- uncertaintyE as certainty relation. From this one can deduce non-trivial phenomenological consequences. The passage from the δXǫ 2µRS = 2µℓpm . (51) energy-position uncertainty relation to the micro black ≃ hole mass-temperature relation has been intensively stud- The proportionality constant µ is of order unity and will ied in recent years. For definiteness we shall follow here be fixed shortly. According to the above arguments, m the treatment of Refs. [44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51]. An must be assumed to be much larger than unity, in order to alternative derivation based on the so-called Landauer avoid the melting transition. With (51) we can rephrase principle will be presented in Appendix. Eq. (50) as We start with an assumption that the lattice spacing 2 is roughly of order Planck length, i.e., ǫ = aℓ , where p a Eǫ p 2µm E . (52) a > 0 is of order of unity. Let us now imagine that we ≃ E − 8 ǫ Ep 6

According to the equipartition principle the average en- m ergy Eǫ of unpolarized photons of the Hawking radiation 8 is linked with their temperature T as 6 Eǫ = kB T. (53) 4 In order to fix µ, we go to the continuum lattice limit ǫ 0 (a 0), and require that formula (52) predicts 2 the→ standard→ semiclassical Hawking temperature: Q ~c3 ~c 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 TH = = . (54) 8πGkBM 4πkBRS This fixes µ = π. FIG. 1: Diagrams for the three mass-temperature relations, Defining the Planck temperature T so that = ours (red), Hawking’s (green), and stringy GUP result (blue), p p with ζ = √2, as an example. As a consequence of the lattice k T /2 and measuring all temperatures in PlanckE units B p uncertainty principle the evaporation ends at a finite temper- asΘ= T/Tp, we can finally cast formula (52) in the form ature with a zero rest-mass remnant. 1 2m = ζ2 2πΘ , (55) 2πΘ − and a minimum rest mass where we have defined the deformation parameter ζ = a/(2π√2). mmin = ζ . (58b) As already mentioned, in the continuum limit both ǫ and a tend to zero and (50) reduces to the ordinary The end of the evaporation process is reached in a finite Heisenberg uncertainty principle. In this case Eq. (55) time, the final temperature is finite, and there is a rem- boils down to nant of a finite rest mass (cf. Refs. [44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 50, 51, 52]). 1 m = . (56) From the standard Heisenberg uncertainty principle we 4πΘ find the green curve, representing the usual Hawking for- This is the dimensionless version of Hawking’s formula mula. Here the evaporation process ends, after a finite (54) for large black holes. time, with a zero mass and a worrisome infinite tem- Historically, the validity of (54) was also postulated for perature. In the literature, the undesired infinite final micro black holes on the assumption that the black hole temperature predicted by Hawking’s formula has so far thermodynamics is universally valid for any black hole, been cured only with the help of the stringy GUP, which be it formed via star collapse, or primordially via quan- brings the final temperature to a finite value. This result tum fluctuations. Such an assumption is by no means is, however, also questionable since it implies the exis- warranted without some further input about mesoscopic tence of finite-mass remnants in the universe. Though and/or microscopic energy scales (much like in ordinary by some authors such remnants are greeted as relevant thermodynamics) and, in fact, we have seen that correc- candidates for dark matter [57], others point out that tions should be expected at short world-crystal scales. their existence would create further complications such It is instructive to compare our mass-temperature rela- as the entropy/information problem [58], detectability is- tion (55) with the one suggested by the so-called stringy sue, or their (excessive) production in the early universe uncertainty relation [55, 56]. There the sign of the cor- [27, 59]. rection term in (55) is positive: In contrast to these results, our lattice GUP predicts the red curve. This yields a finite end temperature 1 2 2m = + ζ 2πΘ . (57) 1 2πΘ Θ = , (59) max 2πζ The phenomenological consequences of the relation (55) are quite different from those of the stringy result with a zero-mass remnant. The mass-temperature for- (57). In Fig. 1 we compare the two results, and add mula (55) thus solves at once several problems by pre- also the curve for the ordinary Hawking relation (56). dicting the end of the evaporation process at a finite final Considering m and Θ as functions of time, we can fol- temperature with zero-mass remnants. low the evolution of a micro black hole from the curves Is should be stressed that since the photon GUP (43) 2 2 2 in Fig. 1. For the stringy GUP, the blue line predicts a and (49) holds only for states ψ where pˆ ψ ~ /ǫ , maximum temperature our reasonings are warranted only for h i ≪

1 1 Θmax = , (58a) E ~c/ǫ /a 2πζ . (60) 2πζ ǫ ≪ ≃ Ep ⇒ ≪ Θ 7

This implies, in particular, that when Θ is close to Θmax By integrating dS we obtain S = S(Θ). Just as for- our long-wavelength approximation cannot be trusted. mula (55), the relation (65) can be trusted only for To understand the behavior of the system close to Θ Θmax = 1/2πζ. Thus, when integrating (65), we ≪ Θmax we must turn to the short-wavelength limit, should do this only up to a cutoff Θ˜ max Θmax. The Eqs. (33) and (46). In this regime the momenta lie additive constant in S can be then be fixed≪ by requiring close to the border of the Brillouin zone pˆ Pˆ that S = 0 when Θ Θ˜ max. This is equivalent to what ψ ǫ ψ → π~/(2ǫ), and Eq. (40) implies h i ≃ h i ≃ is usually done when calculating the Hawking temperature for a Schwarzschild black hole. There one fixes the √2 additive constant in the entropy integral to be zero for E ~c , (61) ǫ ≃ ǫ m = 0, so that S(m = 0) = S(Θ ) = 0 (the minimum mass attainable in the standard→ ∞ Hawking effect is which for the Planckian lattice, where ǫ = aℓp, gives m = 0). Thus we obtain Eǫ p/(π ζ). Considering again the uncertainty in the ≃E Θ˜ max 2 photon position as δXǫ 2πℓpm (cf. Eq. (51)), GUP k 1 2πζ ≃ S = B + dΘ′ (66) (46) then predicts 4 2πΘ′3 Θ′ ZΘ a a2ℓ2 2 where the sign was chosen in order to have a positive δX m 1 p Ep = 0 . (62) ǫ 2 ~2 2 2 2 entropy. ∝ ≃ 2π − 2 c π ζ ! The integral (66) yields We can thus conclude that the mass of the micro black k 1 1 Θ˜ hole must go to zero. This is also consistent with our pre- S(Θ) = B +8π2ζ2 log max . (67) 2 ˜ 2 vious long-wavelength considerations. The micro black 16 π Θ − Θmax Θ ! hole therefore evaporates completely, without leaving remnants. The entropy is always positive, and S 0 forΘ Θ˜ max. → →

VII. ENTROPY AND HEAT CAPACITY B. Heat Capacity

In this section we exhibit the modified thermodynamic With entropy formulae (65) and (67) at hand we can entropy and heat capacity of a black hole implied by the now compute the heat capacity of a (micro) black hole in new mass-temperature formula (55). the world-crystal. This will give us important insights on the final stage of the evaporation process. Again, we shall obtain formulae valid only for Θ Θmax =1/(2πζ). ≪ A. Entropy The heat capacity C of a black hole is defined via the relation

From the first law of black hole thermodynamics [60] dQ = dE = CdT . (68) we know that the differential of the thermodynamical entropy of a Schwarzschild black hole reads The pressure exerted on the environment by the expanding black hole surface is zero. Hence we do not need to dE dS = , (63) specify which C is meant. TH With the help of (63) and (68) we obtain where dE is the amount of energy swallowed by a black dS dS C = T = Θ , (69) hole with Hawking temperature TH . In Eq. (63) the dT dΘ increase in the internal energy is equal to the added heat because a black hole makes no mechanical work when which yields its entropy/surface changes (expanding surface does not πk 1 exert any pressure). C = B ζ2 + . (70) Rewriting Eq. (63) with the dimensionless variables m − 2 (2πΘ)2 and Θ we get From this clearly follows that C is always negative. k dm Most condensed-matter systems have C > 0. However, dS = B . (64) 2 Θ because of instabilities induced by gravity this is generally not the case in astrophysics [61, 62], especially in Inserting here formula (55) we find black hole physics. A Schwarzschild black hole has C < 0 which indicates that the black hole becomes hotter by ra- 2 kB dm kB 1 2πζ diating. The result (70) implies that this scenario holds dS = = + dΘ . (65) 2 Θ − 4 2πΘ3 Θ also for micro black holes in the world-crystal. 8

In case of stringy GUP, we have to use Eq. (57) as the A. ’t Hooft’s proposal mass-temperature formula. The expression for the heat capacity then reads The first application relates to ’t Hooft’s proposal which purports to justify that our quantum world is πk 1 C = B ζ2 . (71) merely a low-energy limit of a deterministic system op- 2 − (2πΘ)2 erating at a deeper, perhaps Planckian, level of dynam- ics [37, 38]. As a deterministic substrate ’t Hooft has Since also here 0 < Θ < Θmax =1/2πζ, black holes have proposed various cellular automata (CA) models. negative specific heat also according to the stringy GUP. In general, a CA is an array of cells forming a discrete However, stringy GUP displays a striking difference with lattice. All cells are typically equivalent and can take one respect to lattice GUP. In fact, since in principle we can of a finite number of possible discrete states. Like space, trust Eq. (57) also when Θ Θmax =1/2πζ, then from time is discrete as well. At each time step every cell up- (71) we have, in such limit,≃C = 0. This means that dates its state according to a transition rule which takes for the stringy GUP the specific heat vanishes at the into account the previous states of cells in the neighbor- end point of the evaporation process in a finite time, so hood, including its own state. In this sense the evolution that the black hole at the end of its evolution cannot is deterministic. exchange energy with the surrounding space. In other One of the simplest CA considered by ’t Hooft is the 1- words, the black hole stops to interact thermodynami- dimensional periodic CA with 4-state cells, and with the cally with the environment. The final stage of the Hawk- nearest neighbor (N-N) transition rule, see Fig. 2. This ing evaporation, according to the stringy GUP scenario, contains a Planck-size remnant with a maximal tempera- 4 ture Θ = Θmax, but thermodynamically inert. The rem-

t nant behaves like an elementary particle — there are no

1 3 internal degrees of freedom to excite in order to produce a heat absorption or emission. t

To understand the heat exchange in the last live stage of the world-crystal black hole we cannot use the long- 2 wavelength formula (70). Instead, we must turn to x Eq. (46). Since in our scenario the micro black hole dis- appears at the critical temperature Θmax, it is more ap- FIG. 2: CA with discrete time evolution described by propriate to write the mass-temperature formula (46) in Eq. (74) and with the periodicity condition σi = σi+4. The the form right-hand shows an equivalent graphical representation.

2 √2 a 2 m θ(Θmax Θ) ζ 1 Θ , (72) “clock like” CA can be generally described with 2N +1 ≃ − π − 8 cells σi (i = N,...,N) each with two possible states 0, 1 (cell is,− e.g., white or black). The discrete time where θ(t) is the Heaviside step function. For the speciﬁc evolution{ } with the elementary time step δt is described heat this implies by the N-N transition rule

3 ′ C θ(Θmax Θ) √2π kBζ Θ . (73) (σ −1, σ , σ +1) σ = σ (t + δt): ≃ − − i i i → i i (0, 0, 0) 0, (0, 0, 1) 0, (0, 1, 0) 0, So, in contrast to the stringy result, a world-crystal black → → → hole exchanges heat with its environment by radiation (1, 0, 0) 1, (1, 1, 0) 0, (0, 1, 1) 0, until the last moment of its existence, and unlike the → → → (1, 0, 1) 0, (1, 1, 1) 0 , (74) Schwarzschild black hole, the heat exchange with the en- → → vironment increases in the ﬁnal stage of its evaporation. In addition, because of the θ-function in (73), the transi- with the Born-von Karman periodicity condition σi = tion from the universe with the world-crystal black hole σi+2N+1. to the one without it is of ﬁrst order. The cells can be algebraically represented by orthonor- mal vectors

0 1 0 VIII. FURTHER APPLICATIONS 0 0 . σ−N =  . ; σ−N+1 =  . ; ... σN =  . , . . 1       So far we have studied the consequence of the GUP on  1   0   0        the micro black holes. Let us brieﬂy mention two further       applications. σ−N = σN+1. On the basis spanned by σi the 9 elementary-time step evolution operator is: which for small δt gives

2 0 1 δt 2 [Xˆǫ, Pˆǫ] i 1 (Hˆ ωN /2) . (81) π 1 0 −iHδtˆ −i ≃ − 2 − Uˆ(δt = τ)= e = e 2N+1  . . , (75) .. ..   In addition, we deduce from (75) and (78) that  1 0      sin[(Hˆ ω /2)δt] = ǫPˆ , (82) which, among others, defines the Hamiltonian Hˆ . The − N ǫ −i π pre-factor e 2N+1 is known as ’t Hooft’s phase conven- which is compatible with the result (20). From (82) fol- tion. Because Uˆ 2N+1 = 1ˆ1 one can diagonalize Uˆ as ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ − lows that H depends only on Pǫ but not on Xǫ. So Pǫ π 2πN 2πN ˆ −i N −i N i N and H are simultaneously diagonalizable. By defining Uˆdiag = e 2 +1 diag e 2 +1 ,..., 1,...,e 2 +1 . the operators Kˆ± as If we denote the eigenstates of Hˆ as n , we find that ˆ −iXˆǫ ˆ ˆ ˆ iXˆǫ | i K+ = e Pǫ, K− = Pǫ e , (83) N 1 2πn ˆ ˆ † n = exp i ℓ σ , (76) (K− = K+), so that | i √ − 2N +1 ℓ 2N +1 =− ℓXN 2N +1 2π Kˆ+ n = sin n n +1 , with n = N,...,N and the ensuing “energy” spectrum | i 2π 2N +1 | i reads − ˆ 2N +1 2π 2π K− n = sin (n 1) n 1 , (84) Hˆ n = ω n + 1 n , ω . (77) | i 2π 2N +1 − | − i | i N 2 | i N ≡ (2N + 1)δt one can persuade itself that Hˆ and Kˆ± close the deformed The energy values En resemble the spectrum of the har- algebra which in the large N limit (i.e., in the small ǫ or monic oscillator, except that the n’s are bounded and can δt limit) reduces to attain negative values. We shall be coming back to this issue shortly. 2Hˆ Position and momentum can be represented by opera- [H,ˆ Kˆ±] = ωKˆ±, [Kˆ+, Kˆ−] = , (85) ω tors with the matrix representations ± − with ω = ω . ( N + 1)ǫ 0 0 0 ∞ − ··· Note that for large N one can identify (77), (84), and 0 ( N + 2)ǫ 0 0 (85) with the representation of SU(1, 1) known as the  −  Xˆ = . .. . , + − ǫ . . . discrete series D1/2 D1/2 (cf. Ref. [63]). Generally, the   + ⊕−  0 Nǫ 0  Lie algebra Dk Dk is defined through the relations:  0 ··· 0 Nǫ  ⊕  ··· −    Lˆ3 k,m = (m + k) k,m , 0 1 0 0 1 | i | i ··· − 10 1 0 0 Lˆ+ k,m = (m +2k)(m + 1) k,m +1 , − ··· | i | i 1  0 10 1 0  ˆ − ··· Lˆ− k,m = p(n +2k 1)m k,m 1 , Pǫ = . . . , (78) 2iǫ . .. .  | i − | − i  . .  ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ   [L3, L±] = pL±, [L+, L−] = 2L3 . (86)  0 0 0 1  ± −  1 0 ··· 1 0   ··· −  Here m + k = k, (k + 1), (k + 2),... and k =   1 3 ± ± ± where ǫ =2π/(2N + 1). With these we obtain the com- 2 , 1, 2 , 2,... is the so-called Bargmann index which labels + − mutator the representations. From this we have that D D 1/2 ⊕ 1/2 corresponds to 01 0 0 1 ··· 10 1 0 0 ˆ 1 1 L3 2 ,m = (m +1/2) 2 ,m ,  01 0 1 ··· 0  | i | i ˆ ˆ i ··· ˆ 1 1 [Xǫ, Pǫ] = . . . . (79) L+ 2 ,m = (m + 1) 2 ,m +1 , 2  . .. .  | i | i  . .  ˆ 1 1   L− 2 ,m = m 2 ,m 1 , (87)  0 0 0 1  | i | − i  1 0 ··· 1 0   ···  Identification with the large-N limit of (77) and (84) is   ˆ ˆ ˆ In deriving (79) we have used the the periodicity condi- established when we identify H in (87) with ωL3, K± ˆ tion σ−1 = σ2N . By comparing this with the evolution with L±, and set m = n. operator (75) we have At this stage one can invoke ’t Hooft’s loss of information condition [37, 38], and project out the negative part [Xˆ , Pˆ ] = i cos[(Hˆ ω /2)δt] , (80) of the spectra. A plausible rationale for this step can ǫ ǫ − N 10 be found, e.g., in irreversibility of computational process The connections of the DSR model with our proposal due to a finite storage capacity [64]. are at this point self evident. Our GUP (22), (24) im- After the negative energy spectrum is removed plies that, at the boundary of the Brillouin zone, when (erased), we obtain only the positive discrete series pˆ ψ ~π/2ǫ, i.e. for Planck energies Eǫ (2√2/a) p, + h i → ≃ E D1/2 (i.e., representation where m = 0, 1, 2,...), and the fundamental commutator vanishes the Hamiltonian morphs into a non-negative spectrum + [Xˆ , Pˆ ] 0 , (90) Hamiltonian H . ǫ ǫ ≃ The usual W (1)-algebra of the quantum harmonic oscillator emerges after we introduce the following mapping and since in the universal enveloping algebra of SU(1, 1): ∆Xǫ∆Pǫ & 0 , (91)

1 † 1 aˆ = Lˆ−, aˆ = Lˆ+ . (88) lattice quantum mechanics at short wavelengths allows Lˆ3 +1/2 Lˆ3 +1/2 for classical behavior, that is uncertainties of two com- q q plementary observables can be simultaneously zero. The latter gives a one-to-one (non-linear) mapping be- However, if we express the fundamental commutator tween the deterministic cellular automaton system (with (22) of our model in terms of energy, using the exact information loss) and the quantum harmonic oscillator. relation (40), we find (for ǫ = aℓp) The reader will recognize the mapping Eq. (88) as the non-compact analog [65] of the well-known Holstein- a2 Eˆ2 Xˆ , Pˆ f(x) = i~ 1 f(x) . (92) Primakoff representation for SU(2) spin systems [66]. ǫ ǫ − 8 2 Ep ! Our operators Xˆǫ, Pˆǫ and Iˆǫ may be viewed as the h i same cellular automaton E(2) algebra as discussed in This means that the deforming term in our model is Section III. Thus we can conclude that in the Planckian quadratic in the energy, instead of the linear dependence scale the system must behave deterministically — which in the energy of the DSR model (89). is one of the defining property of cellular automata. It is only at low energies when the loss of information leads to the emergent degrees of freedom resulting in the usual IX. DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY quantum mechanical description It should be noted that the present lattice generaliza- tion of the uncertainty principle is not an approximate B. Double special relativity description, but it is an exact formula necessarily implied by our model of lattice space time. The great majority The second application relates to the idea of double (or of the GUP research has always borrowed the deformed doubly or deformed) special relativity (DSR) (see, e.g., commutator [ˆx, pˆ]= i~(1+κpˆ2) either from string theory, Refs. [36, 67]). The general idea is that if the Planck or from heuristic arguments about black holes [55, 56]. length is a truly universal quantity, then it should look To be precise, even in string theory [55] the formula ex- the same to any inertial observer. This demands a mod- pressing the GUP is not derived from the basic features ification (deformation) of the Lorenz transformations, to of the model, but instead it is deduced from high-energy accommodate an invariant length scale. In Ref. [36] the gedanken experiments of string scatterings. In contrast nonlinearity of the deformed Lorenz transformations lead to this we have derived all results from a simple lattice the authors to novel commutators between spacetime co- model of spacetime, and from the analytic structure of ordinates and momenta, depending on the energy the basic commutator (22). We have calculated the uncertainties on a crystal-like E universe whose lattice spacing is of the order of Planck xî, pˆ = i~ 1 δi , (89) j − j length — the so-called world crystal. When the ener- Ep gies lie near the border of the Brillouin zone, i.e., for where E is the energy scale of the particle to which the Planckian energies, the uncertainty relations for position deformed Lorenz boost is to be applied, while p is the and momenta do not pose any lower bound on the as- Planck energy. This suggests that they have anE energy- sociated uncertainties. Hence the world crystal universe dependent Planck “constant” ~(E)= ~(1 E/ ). Their can become“deterministic” at Planckian energies. In this − Ep model also implies that ~(E) 0 for E p. For en- high-energy regime, our lattice uncertainty relations re- ergies much below that Planck→ regime, the→ usual E Heisen- semble the double special relativity result of Magueijo berg commutators are recovered, but when E one and Smolin. ≃ Ep has ~( p) 0. So the Planck energy is not only an in- The scenario in which the universe at Planckian en- variantE in this≃ model, but the world looks also apparently ergies is deterministic rather than being dominated by classical at the Planck scale, similarly as in ’t Hooft’s pro- quantum fluctuations is a starting point in ’t Hooft’s “de- posal. terministic” quantum mechanics. 11

With the generalized uncertainty relation at hand we X. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS have been able to derive a new mass-temperature relation for Schwarzschild micro black holes. In contrast to stan- One of us (P.J.) is grateful to G. Vitiello for instigat- dard results based on Heisenberg or stringy uncertainty ing discussions. This work was partially supported by relations, our mass-temperature formula predicts both the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic (re- finite Hawking’s temperature and a zero rest-mass rem- search plan MSM 6840770039), and by the Deutsche nant at the end of the evaporation process. Especially the Forschungsgemeinschaft under grant Kl256/47. F.S. ac- absence of remnants is a welcome bonus which allows to knowledges financial support by the National Taiwan avoid such conceptual difficulties as entropy/information University under the contract NSC 98-2811-M-002-086, problem or why we do not experimentally observe the and thanks ITP Freie Universität Berlin for warm hospi- remnants that must have been prodigiously produced in tality. the early universe.

Appendix: Landauer principle Apart from the mass-temperature relation we have also computed two relevant thermodynamic characteristics, Here we wish to provide an alternative derivation of namely entropy and heat capacity. Particularly the heat the mass-temperature formula (55) based on Landauer’s capacity provided an important insight into the last life principle. To this end we consider an ensemble of un- stage of the world-crystal micro black holes. In contrast polarized photons that are going to deliver to a micro to the stringy result, our result indicates that world- black hole one single bit of information per particle. In crystal micro black hole exchanges heat with its environ- order to be sure that each photon delivers only one bit of ment (radiate) till the last moment of its existence, and information — namely the information that it is there, unlike the Schwarzschild micro black hole, the heat ex- somewhere inside in the black hole, its position uncer- change with the environment increases in the final stage tainty must be “maximal”, i.e., it should not be smaller of the evaporation. In addition, the transition from the than Schwarzschild’s radius R as otherwise the photon universe with the world-crystal micro black hole to the S would deliver to black hole also extra bits of information one without is of the first order. concerning its entry point (or better sector) on the horizon. At the same time its wavelength should not be big- Since the world crystal physics allows for deterministic ger than RS, as otherwise the photon would bounced off description of the physics at Planckian energies, we have the black hole without getting trapped. In this view, the included in this paper a discussion of ’t Hooft’s periodic position uncertainty of a photon in the ensemble must be of order of Schwarzschild’s radius R i.e., ∆X µR . automaton model which gives at low energy scales rise S ǫ ≃ S to a genuine quantum harmonic oscillator. In addition, Factor µ is Bekenstein’s deficit coefficient which ensures such an automaton has a close connection with our world a correct Hawking’s formula in a continuum limit. crystal paradigm. Here we have re-derived ’t Hooft’s re- An extra bit of information added to the micro black sult in a new way. In contrast to ’t Hooft derivation [38] hole will increase its energy at least by amount ∆Eǫ so we have matched the algebra of the automaton variables that (cf. (43)) with the SU(1, 1) algebra, and in contrast to Ref. [63] ~c ǫ2 we have worked with a different set of dynamical vari- ∆X ∆E 1 (∆E )2 . (93) ǫ ǫ ≃ 2 − 2~2c2 ǫ ables. In the contraction limit (i.e., in the limit of many lattice spacings — low energy limit) we have recovered In the following we denote ∆E simply as E to stress the canonical W (1)-algebra and were able to identify the ǫ ǫ that ∆Eǫ an energy increas due to one photon. With the “emergent” harmonic oscillator variables. explicit form for Planck’s energy ~ c 19 There are several aspects of the double special relativ- p = 0.61 10 GeV , (94) E 2ℓ ≈ · ity that are worth noting in the connection with our gen- p eralized uncertainty relation. Essentially, we have seen the relation (93) can be cast to that the fundamental commutator in DSR as well as in 2 our lattice GUP goes to zero at Planck energy. For both ~c a ℓpEǫ models, the world should therefore be manifestly ”classi- ∆Xǫ . (95) ≃ 2Eǫ − 8 p cal” in the Planck regime, a feature very different from E the common believe. This is a striking prediction sup- If we use further the fact that, RS = ℓp m, where m is ported by both models, although the lines of thought the relative mass of the black hole in Planck units, i.e., 2 followed in the two research paths are completely differ- m = M/Mp (Mp = p/c ), we can rewrite (95) as ent and independent. Moreover, this aspect presents also E 2 a strong resemblance with the results obtained in the re- p a Eǫ 2mµ E . (96) search line of “deterministic” quantum mechanics. ≃ E − 8 ǫ Ep 12

According to the Landauer principle [68], when a single an unpolarized photon in the outgoing Hawking radia- bit of information is erased (like in the black hole) the tion. Deﬁning the Planck temperature Tp = 2 p/kB amount of energy dissipated into environment is at least 3 1032 K, and measuring the temperature inE terms of≈ · kBT ln 2, where kB is Boltzmann’s constant and T is the Planck units as a relative temperature Θ = T/Tp, we temperature of the erasing environment (in our case the can rewrite Eq. (96) in the form micro black hole). Since the liberated energy per bit of 1 lost information can not be grater the energy Eǫ of the 2m = 2πζ2Θ . (98) carrier photon we have that 2πΘ −

Eǫ kB T. (97) where we identify ζ = a/(2√2π) and set µ = π, in order ≃ to agree with (55) and with Hawking’s formula (56) in Relation (97) basically expresses equipartition law for the continuum limit.

[1] E. Witten, Physics Today 49 (1996) 24. http://www.phys.uu.nl/~thooft/lectures/Erice 08. [2] L.J. Garay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 2508. pdf and in Pescara 2008 http://www.icra.it/ICRA [3] C. Rovelli, Quantum Gravity, (Cambridge University Networkshops/INW25 Stueckelberg3/Welcome.html. Press, Cambridge, 2004). [25] H. Kleinert, Ann. d. Physik 44 (1987) 117. [4] R. Gambini and J. Pullin, J. Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) [26] N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. Dvali, Phys. 124021. Lett. B 429(1998) 263; [hep-ph/9803315]. [5] J. Alfaro, H.A. Morales-Tecotl and L.F. Urrutia Phys. I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 2318. and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 436 (1998) 257; [6] G. Amelino-Camelia and S. Majid Int. J. Mod. Phys. [hep-ph/9804398]. A 15 (2000) 4301. [27] S.B. Giddings and M.L. Mangano, Phys. Rev. D 78 [7] A. Matusis, L. Susskind and N. Toumbas J. High Energy (2008) 035009. Phys. JHEP0012 (2000) 002. [28] A. Barrau, J. Grain and S.O. Alexeyev, Phys. Lett. B 584 [8] G. Amelino-Camelia Phys. Lett. B 510 (2001) 255. (2004) 114. [9] N.R. Douglas and N.A. Nekrasov Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 [29] A. Connes, Publ. I.H.E.S 62 (1986) 257. (2001) 977. [30] A. Dimakis and F. Müller–Hoissen, Phys. Let. B 295 [10] T. Jacobson and A.C. Wall, [arXiv:0804.2720]. (1992) 242. [11] T. Toffoli, IEEE Computer Society Press (1993) 5; [31] A. Dimakis, F. Müller–Hoissen and T. Striker, J. Phys. Bull.It.Assoc.Artificial Intelligence 14 (2001) 32 A 26 (1993) 1927. [12] S. Wolfram, Rev. Mod. Phys. 55 (1983) 601. [32] E. Celeghini, S.De Martino, S.De Siena, M. Rasetti and [13] S. Wolfram., A New Kind of Science, (Wolfram Media, G. Vitiello, Ann. Phys. 241 (1995) 50. Champaign, IL, 2002). [33] E. Schrödinger, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Acad. Wiss. 24 [14] ’t Hooft G., J. Stat. Phys. 53 (1988). (1930) 296. [15] ’t Hooft G., in 37th Int. School of Subnuclear Phys., [34] H.P. Robertson, Phys. Rev. 34 (1929) 163. Erice, Ed. A. Zichichi, (World Scientific, London, 1999). [35] A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics 2 Volumes, (Dover Pub- [16] See the homepage: lications Inc., New York, 2003) http://www.sciops.esa.int/ [36] J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) index.php?project=PLANCK 044017. [17] See the homepage: http://icecube.wisc.edu/ [37] G. ‘t Hooft, Class. Quant. Grav. 16 (1999) 3263; [18] M. Creutz, Quarks, gluons and lattices, (Cambridge [gr-qc/9903084]; [hep-th/0105105]. Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1983). [38] G. ‘t Hooft, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 42 (2003) 355; [19] H. Kleinert, Gauge Fields in Condensed Matter, [hep-th/0104080]; [hep-th/0104219]. Vol. I Superflow and vortex lines. Disorder fields, [39] H.-T. Elze, Phys. Lett. A 310 (2003) 110; J. Phys. Conf. phase transitions, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989) Ser. 174 (2009) 012009. (http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/~kleinert/b1) [40] T.S. Biro, S.G. Matinyan and B. Muller, Found. Phys. [20] H. Kleinert, Gauge Fields in Condensed Matter, Vol. II Lett. 14(2001) 471. Stresses and Defects, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989) [41] R. Banerjee, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 17 (2002) 631. (http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/~kleinert/b2) [42] J.J. Halliwell, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 085013. [21] R. Friedberg and T.D. Lee, Nucl. Phys. B 225 (1983) 1. [43] M. Blasone, P. Jizba, G. Vitiello, Phys. Lett. A 287 [22] R. Friedberg and T.D. Lee, Nucl. Phys. B 245 (1983) (2001) 205. 343. [44] F. Scardigli, Nuovo Cim. B 110 (1995) 1029. [23] H. Kleinert, Multivalued Fields in Condensed Matter, [45] R.J. Adler, P. Chen and D.I. Santiago, Gen. Rel. Grav. Electromagnetism, and Gravitation, (World Scientific, 33 (2001) 2101. Singapore, 2008). [46] P. Chen and R.J. Adler, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 124 [24] The appeal of such a description of geometry has (2003) 103. recently been recognized also by G. ’t Hooft in various [47] M. Cavaglia and S. Das, Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) summer school lectures, for instance in Erice 2008 4511. 13

[48] M. Cavaglia, S. Das and R. Maartens, Class. Quant. hep-th/9508151. Grav. 20 (2003) L205. [59] B.J. Carr and S.W. Hawking, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. [49] L. Susskind, J. Lindesay, An Introduction to Black Holes, Soc. 168 (1974) 399; K. Nozari, Astroparticle Physics 27 Information, and the String Theory Revolution (World (2007) 169; A. Barrau, C. Feron and J. Grain, Astro- Scientific, Singapore, 2005). See chapter 10. phys.J. 630 (2005) 1015. [50] K. Nouicer, Class. Quant. Grav. 24, (2007) 5917. [60] J.M. Bardeen, B. Carter, S.W. Hawking, Commun. [51] F. Scardigli, Glimpses on the micro black hole planck Math. Phys. 31 (1973) 161. phase, [arXiv:0809.1832]. [61] W. Thirring, Z. Physik 239 (1970) 339. [52] R. Casadio, P. Nicolini, JHEP 0811, (2008) 072. [62] H.D. Zeh, The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time [53] H. Kleinert, Phys. Lett. A 91 (1982) 295. (Springer, Berlin, 1992). [54] W. Heisenberg, Zeitschrift für Physik, 43 (1927) 172. [63] M. Blasone, P. Jizba and G. Vitiello, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. [55] G. Veneziano, Europhys Lett. 2 (1986) 199; D. Amati, Suppl. 72 (2003) 50; M. Blasone and P. Jizba, Can. J. M. Ciafaloni, G. Veneziano, Phys. Lett. B 197 (1987) 81; Phys. 80 (2002) 645; M. Blasone, E. Celeghini, P. Jizba D.J. Gross, P.F. Mende, Phys. Lett. B 197, (1987) 129; and G. Vitiello, Phys. Lett. A 310 (2003) 393. D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni and G. Veneziano, Phys. Lett. [64] M. Blasone and P. Jizba, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 67 (2007) B 216 (1989) 41; G. Veneziano, Quantum Gravity near 012046. the Planck scale, Talk at PASCOS 90, Boston PASCOS [65] C. C. Gerry, J. Phys. A 16 (1983) L1. 486 (1990); K. Konishi, G. Paffuti, P. Provero, Phys. Lett. [66] T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Phys. Rev. 58 (1940) 1098; B 234, (1990) 276; R. Guida, K. Konishi and P. Provero, M. N. Shah, H. Umezawa and G. Vitiello, Phys. Rev. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6 (1991) 1487. B 10 (1974) 4724. [56] M. Maggiore, Phys. Lett. B 304 (1993) 65; F. Scardigli, [67] G. Amelino-Camelia, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 11 (2002) 35; Phys. Lett. B 452 (1999) 39; R.J. Adler and D.I. Santi- J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) ago, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14 (1999) 1371. 190403; G. Amelino-Camelia, Nature 418 (2002) 34. [57] P. Chen, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 19 (2004) 1047; New As- [68] see, e.g., H.S. Leff and A.F. Rex, Maxwell’s Demon: tron. Rev. 49 (2005) 233. Entropy, Information, Computing (Princeton University [58] J.D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 1912; Press, Princeton, 1990). S.B. Giddings, The black hole information paradox