DOCSLIB.ORG

Custom As a Source of International Humanitarian Law

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CUSTOM AS A SOURCE OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW Proceedings of the Conference to Mark the Publication of the ICRC Study “Customary International Humanitarian Law” held in New Delhi, 8–9 December 2005 Edited by Larry Maybee Benarji Chakka ICRC New Delhi Organised Jointly by: International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and Asian African Legal Consultative Organization (AALCO) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword by Vincent Nicod vii Foreword by Dr. Wafik Z. Kamil xi Acknowledgements xiii Introduction 1 INAUGURAL SESSION Introduction of the Session – Larry Maybee 5 Welcome Address – Vincent Nicod 7 Introductory Remarks – Wafik Z. Kamil 13 Inaugural Address – E. Ahamed 19 OPENING ADDRESS Introduction of Judge Weeramantry – V.S. Mani 23 The Revival of Customary International Humanitarian Law – C.G. Weeramantry 25 THE ICRC STUDY ON CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW – AN ASSESSMENT Introductory Remarks of the Session – Amitabh Mattoo 41 The ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law – An Assessment – Jean-Marie Henckaerts 43 Customary International Humanitarian Law: Some First Impressions – Pemmaraju Srinivasa Rao 53 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS The ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law – An Assessment – Djamchid Momtaz 71 KEYNOTE ADDRESS Introduction of Judge Philippe Kirsch – Wafik Z. Kamil 77 Customary International Humanitarian Law, its Enforcement, and the Role of the International Criminal Court – Philippe Kirsch 79 THE RELEVANCE OF CUSTOMARY LAW FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW Introductory Remarks of the Session – A. Rohan Perera 87 Relevance to the Ratification of IHL Treaties by States – J.S. Verma 89 Relevance for the National Implementation of IHL – Christopher Harland 97 Relevance for the Prosecution of Violations of IHL – Françoise Hampson 103 THE IMPLICATIONS OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW FOR THE CONDUCT OF MILITARY OPERATIONS Introductory Remarks of the Session – C. Jayaraj 115 Implications for General Military Operations – Titus K. Githiora 117 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Implications for Peace Keeping Operations – Daphna Shraga 123 Implications for Non-International Armed Conflicts – Zhu Wenqi 129 THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE TREATMENT OF PERSONS IN ARMED CONFLICT Introductory Remarks of the Session – Ali Reza Deihim 139 Fundamental Guarantees in International Humanitarian Law – L.R. Penna 141 The treatment of Persons in Armed Conflict and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights – Nurhalida Mohamed Khalil 163 Procedural Principles and Safeguards for Internment/Administrative Detention in Armed Conflict and other Situations of Violence – Jelena Pejic 197 Closing Remarks - C.G. Weeramantry 221 Question & Answers 229 Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law: A contribution to the understanding and respect for the Rule of Law in Armed Conflict – Jean-Marie Henckaerts 257 v vi FOREWORD BY VINCENT NICOD Many conflicts, both international and non-international in character, are raging throughout the world today. Parties to these armed conflicts are often accused of not obeying the law of war, and terrible atrocities are committed. Though they may sometimes be ignorant of this law, belligerents are neither legally nor morally free to make “their own rules” in a conflict. The modern development of international humanitarian law (IHL) has created written rules to regulate how wars are fought. Although there are many different IHL treaties, the difficulty with these so-called treaty-based rules is that they only apply to those countries that are parties to the specific treaties that contain them. This results in a tendency to take a narrow approach to the rules, their application and interpretation. There are, however, many long-standing rules of international law that govern how adversaries should behave in conflicts. Many of them can be traced to ancient cultures, where they were implemented long before the notion of humanitarian law treaties ever existed in the western world. For the last ten years, ICRC legal advisors, with the assistance of legal experts from around the globe, have undertaken the task of collecting and studying these humanitarian rules and values, with the aim of producing a definitive record of the customary law rules that apply during armed conflict. The ICRC study Customary International Humanitarian Law, published in March 2005, is the result of this work. The Customary Law Study is a great achievement; it constitutes the first comprehensive study on the subject. The Asian regional launch of the Customary Law Study took place in New Delhi at a conference held on 8 and 9 December 2005. The advantage of customary rules of IHL is that they bind all those who participate in armed conflict, whether they are parties to a specific treaty or not. In addition, customary law rules are not restricted in their field of application. Many of them apply to all forms of conflict, whether vii international or non-international. These 161 customary law rules of warfare bind all belligerents on both sides of a conflict. They also fill the gaps that exist in the treaty rules applicable in non-international armed conflicts, including targeting, proportionality, precautions in attack and the protection of civilians and civilian property. This is not to say that treaty law is now less important. The entire body of law should be seen in a holistic way, with both treaty and custom contributing in near equal parts to assist and protect the victims of armed conflicts. We in the ICRC urge all states to continue to join with the majority of the international community who have ratified the key legal instruments of IHL, such as the 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions, the Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court and the Ottawa Treaty banning anti-personnel landmines. We also urge states to take the steps necessary to implement these treaties, including enacting domestic legislation. This will allow these laws to be properly enforced in periods of armed conflict and internal violence, and help ensure better compliance. We must all keep in mind, however, that this addition to the body of humanitarian law is not an end in itself. There must be strong leadership within governments to ensure the political will exists to enforce the law and to bring to justice those that fail to respect it. There must be legislative and judicial measures taken to enable breaches of the law to be repressed. Those deprived of their freedom and those who are tortured or otherwise ill-treated as a result of armed conflict, need full international compliance with all of the norms of IHL, both treaty and customary. What President Mandela once said of the ICRC can apply to IHL: “it is not so much the good that you do which counts, it is the evil you prevent from happening…” At the ICRC we are pleased to see that this monumental work has by now been given its due recognition, through launch events around the world. The ICRC regional Delegation in New Delhi is proud to have been able to launch this publication in Asia, in collaboration with the Asian African Legal Consultative Organisation (AALCO). Several of the experts who contributed to the Customary Law Study participated in this event and expressed their opinions and views there. This compendium is the outcome of the proceedings of the conference to mark the regional launch and it includes the papers they presented there. viii I am therefore pleased to see this compendium published, to be made available to all people of goodwill whom it will assist by giving them a reference point to the customary international humanitarian law. I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate the contributors to this compendium, for their expertise in contributing to the Study itself, as well as their generosity in providing their papers for publication. Mr. Vincent Nicod Head of Regional Delegation International Committee of the Red Cross New Delhi December 2006 ix x FOREWORD BY DR. WAFIK Z. KAMIL The Asian-African Legal Consultative Organization (AALCO) is an intergovernmental organization comprising 48 Member States representing different legal systems of the Asian-African regions. The purpose of establishment of AALCO is to provide a forum for evolving alternative perspectives of international law particularly keeping in view the specific interests of the Developing Countries and Least Developed Countries. 2006 is the Golden Jubilee year of the Organization. In fifty years of its existence AALCO directly or indirectly, has been part of the every major development in the field of international law AALCO shares a mutually supportive relationship with many international organizations, including the United Nations and many other inter-governmental organizations. International humanitarian law (IHL) is a major area of interest for AALCO and its member States. In this context, it is worth noting our close association with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). We have formalized our cooperation by signing a cooperation agreement on 17 December 2002. Promotion and development of international humanitarian law is the primary objective of our cooperation agreement and was a legalization of our existing and longstanding cooperation. Accordingly, both organizations jointly organized a special meeting in conjunction with AALCO’s Thirty-Sixth Annual Session in Tehran on an important item entitled “Inter-related aspects of International Criminal Court and International Humanitarian Law” and also a seminar on
Recommended publications
  • Constitutional Jurisprudence of History and Natural Law: Complementary Or Rival Modes of Discourse?

    Constitutional Jurisprudence of History and Natural Law: Complementary Or Rival Modes of Discourse?

    California Western Law Review Volume 24 Number 2 Bicentennial Constitutional and Legal Article 6 History Symposium 1988 Constitutional Jurisprudence of History and Natural Law: Complementary or Rival Modes of Discourse? C.M.A. McCauliff Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr Recommended Citation McCauliff, C.M.A. (1988) "Constitutional Jurisprudence of History and Natural Law: Complementary or Rival Modes of Discourse?," California Western Law Review: Vol. 24 : No. 2 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr/vol24/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CWSL Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Western Law Review by an authorized editor of CWSL Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. McCauliff: Constitutional Jurisprudence of History and Natural Law: Compleme Constitutional Jurisprudence of History and Natural Law: Complementary or Rival Modes of Discourse? C.M.A. MCCAULIFF* The Bill of Rights provides broadly conceived guarantees which invite specific judicial interpretation to clarify the purpose, scope and meaning of particular constitutional safeguards. Two time- honored but apparently divergent approaches to the jurisprudence of constitutional interpretation have been employed in recent first amendment cases: first, history has received prominent attention from former Chief Justice Burger in open-trial, family and reli- gion cases; second, natural law has been invoked by Justice Bren- nan in the course of responding to the Chief Justice's historical interpretation. History, although indirectly stating constitutional values, provides the closest expression of the Chief Justice's own jurisprudence and political philosophy.
  • The Australian Legal System & the Rule of Law What Are

    The Australian Legal System & the Rule of Law What Are

    12/1 - Readings and Presentations 2 - The Australian Legal System & The Rule of Law ​ What are the distinguishing features of the ‘Western’ Legal Tradition? → The shared heritage of the modern, Common and Civil legal systems → There are 3 noteworthy characteristics of the western legal tradition ↳ Autonomy of law ⇢ Conceptually distinct from custom, morality, religion or politics ⇢ The content of law is, however, shaped by the above social forces ⇢ This autonomy is reflected in the fact that it has its own institutions, profession, university discipline, literature, language and etiquette ↳ Centrality in social ordering ⇢ Law pervades every aspect of modern society, and is a primary means of social control - it is omnipresent ⇢ Law is seen as the primary means of social change - Political powers campaign for legislative and executive control ↳ Moral authority ⇢ Law commands a high level of respect in western society - This is independent of ideas on the merits of the laws and the respect shown to lawmakers - Idea that the law ought be obeyed, not only from fear of punishment, but from a feeling of positive obligation ⇢ Law generally reflects not only legal obligations, but moral obligations too ⇢ Law ultimately depends on a person’s sense of belonging to society What other legal traditions are there? → Aboriginal legal tradition - inseparable from Aboriginal custom and religion ↳ There is no distinctive hierarchy to uphold the laws, nor is there a distinctive “profession” associated with them → Roman legal tradition - where a monarch exercises
  • 1 Builders Risk Insurance

    1 Builders Risk Insurance

    BUILDERS RISK INSURANCE: Utilizing Builder’s Risk Policies to Help Settle Construction Defect Cases Finding the Oasis in the Desert Gregory N. Ziegler Rebecca M. Alcantar Katherine K. Valent MACDONALD DEVIN, P.C. I. What is Builder’s Risk insurance? Builder’s risk insurance is a unique form of first-party property insurance that typically covers a structure under construction, the materials and equipment used in construction, and the removal of debris of covered property damaged by a covered loss. Builder’s risk insurance policies are typically purchased by the project general contractor or the owner. It is sometimes called “course of construction” coverage because it is only intended to apply during the course of construction, erection, and fabrication of a structure until the construction is considered completed. Coverage typically commences on the “start date” of the project and ends when the work is completed. i. Who is covered? Builder’s risk policies cover the interests of owners, contractors, subcontractors and others involved in the construction project. While contractors and subcontractors are typically covered, it’s a good idea for contractors and subcontractors to request being named insureds on the policy. In comparison, liability insurance covers damage to third parties, such as passersby injured by construction or for damage to adjoining property. ii. What does it cover? Typically, it is written on an “all risks basis” and covers direct physical loss from all causes except those specifically excluded. This does not mean it covers everything, so it is important to look at the exclusions. Although it is typically limited to the construction site, an insured can request coverage for property stored off site and in-transit.
  • SOURCES of PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW Introduction

    SOURCES of PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW Introduction

    SOURCES OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW introduction Marta Statkiewicz Department of International and European Law Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics University of Wrocław sources of law sources of sources of international international law obligations art. 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice 1. The Court, whose function is to decide in accordance with international law such disputes as are submitted to it, shall apply: • international conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting states; • international custom, as evidence of a general practice accepted as law; • the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations; • subject to the provisions of Article 59, judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists of the various nations, as subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law. 2. This provision shall not prejudice the power of the Court to decide a case ex aequo et bono, if the parties agree thereto. art. 38 of the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice The Court shall apply: 1. International conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting States; 2. International custom, as evidence of a general practice accepted as law; 3. The general principles of law recognized by civilized nations; 4. Subject to the provisions of Article 59, judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists of the various nations, as subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law. This provision shall not prejudice the power of the Court to decide a case ex aequo et bono, if the parties agree thereto.
  • Western and Non-Western Legal Cultures and the International Court of Justice

    Western and Non-Western Legal Cultures and the International Court of Justice

    Washington University Law Review Volume 65 Issue 4 Festschrift: A Celebration of the Scholarship and Teaching of Gray L. Dorsey January 1987 Western and Non-Western Legal Cultures and the International Court of Justice Edward McWhinney Simon Fraser University Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Edward McWhinney, Western and Non-Western Legal Cultures and the International Court of Justice, 65 WASH. U. L. Q. 873 (1987). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol65/iss4/18 This Dedication is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Professor McWhinney, like Professor Dorsey, was a student of ES.C. Northrop at Yale Law School in the years immediately following World War II. Professor Northrop believed that the method of dispute settlement embodied in the Statute of the InternationalCourt of Justice is a product of Western European culture and that this method is alien to the cultures of many peoples. Accordingly, Professor Mc Whinney finds, many coun- tries originallyshunned the InternationalCourt of Justice. Recently, how- ever, Third World states, Communist states, and Japan have set aside their cultural differences and appealed to the Court in
  • Sources of International Law: an Introduction

    Sources of International Law: an Introduction

    Sources of International Law: An Introduction by Professor Christopher Greenwood 1. Introduction Where does international law come from and how is it made ? These are more difficult questions than one might expect and require considerable care. In particular, it is dangerous to try to transfer ideas from national legal systems to the very different context of international law. There is no “Code of International Law”. International law has no Parliament and nothing that can really be described as legislation. While there is an International Court of Justice and a range of specialised international courts and tribunals, their jurisdiction is critically dependent upon the consent of States and they lack what can properly be described as a compulsory jurisdiction of the kind possessed by national courts. The result is that international law is made largely on a decentralised basis by the actions of the 192 States which make up the international community. The Statute of the ICJ, Art. 38 identifies five sources:- (a) Treaties between States; (b) Customary international law derived from the practice of States; (c) General principles of law recognized by civilised nations; and, as subsidiary means for the determination of rules of international law: (d) Judicial decisions and the writings of “the most highly qualified publicists”. This list is no longer thought to be complete but it provides a useful starting point. 2. Customary International Law It is convenient to start with customary law as this is both the oldest source and the one which generates rules binding on all States. Customary law is not a written source.
  • Good Faith, Unconscionability and Reasonable Expectations S M Waddams* the Expression 'Good Faith' Makes Frequent Appearances in Contract Law

    Good Faith, Unconscionability and Reasonable Expectations S M Waddams* the Expression 'Good Faith' Makes Frequent Appearances in Contract Law

    Good Faith, Unconscionability and Reasonable Expectations S M Waddams* The expression 'good faith' makes frequent appearances in contract law. The concept is firmly established in American jurisdictions because of its inclusion in the Uniform Commercial Code,1 and the Restatement of Contracts.2 It is in the new Quebec Civil Code.3 It forms an important part of many other civil law systems, and appears in a number of international documents applicable in common law jurisdictions.4 Several cases in Commonwealth jurisdictions have adopted it in various contexts.5 There has been much academic writing on good faith. English and Commonwealth writers have been divided in their opinions on whether the adoption of a general concept of good faith would be desirable.6 American writers, however, rarely discuss this question: the concept is sufficiently firmly fixed now for this to be of theoretical interest only.7 The focus of American writing is on what meaning should be given to the expression, and how it applies in different contexts. On a question of this sort, where the law is in many jurisdictions apparently in the process of change, two levels of analysis are necessary. It is of interest to examine the probable effect and utility of adopting, in English and Commonwealth law, a general doctrine of good faith. This process involves the identification of problems likely to be caused by the doctrine. It is of theoretical as well as of practical interest, and might well tend to suggest caution on the part of law reformers, legislative, judicial, and academic. But since the concept of good faith has found favour in several jurisdictions where it is unlikely to be decisively rejected, an equally important function of analysis is to suggest ways in which the problems of integrating good faith with other contractual concepts can be minimised.
  • The Attack on Western Religions by Western Law: Re-Framing Pluralism, Liberalism and Diversity

    The Attack on Western Religions by Western Law: Re-Framing Pluralism, Liberalism and Diversity

    The University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Law Papers and Journal Articles School of Law 2013 The attack on Western religions by Western law: re-framing pluralism, liberalism and diversity I Benson The University of Notre Dame Australia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/law_article Part of the Law Commons This article was originally published as: Benson, I. (2013). The attack on Western religions by Western law: re-framing pluralism, liberalism and diversity. International Journal of Religious Freedom, 6 (1/2), 111-125. Original article available here: http://www.iirf.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Journal/IJRF_Vol6-1.pdf This article is posted on ResearchOnline@ND at https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/law_article/55. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This article originally published in the International Journal of Religious Freedom. Benson, I. (2013). The attack on Western religions by Western law: re-framing pluralism, liberalism and diversity. International Journal of Religious Freedom, 6(1/2), 111-125. Retrieved from http://www.iirf.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Journal/IJRF_Vol6-1.pdf IJRF Vol 6:1/2 2013 (111–125) 111 The attack on Western religions by Western law Re-framing pluralism, liberalism and diversity Iain T. Benson1 Abstract This paper discusses how law is increasingly being used to attack religious as- sociations under the guise of “equality” advancement and “non-discrimination” restrictions. I explore two important insights: first that the concept of “transforma- tion” has been distorted, to shelter approaches to law that fail to respect properly associational diversity.
  • The Religious Foundations of Western Law

    The Religious Foundations of Western Law

    Catholic University Law Review Volume 24 Issue 3 Spring 1975 Article 4 1975 The Religious Foundations of Western Law Harold J. Berman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Harold J. Berman, The Religious Foundations of Western Law, 24 Cath. U. L. Rev. 490 (1975). Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol24/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Catholic University Law Review by an authorized editor of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE RELIGIOUS FOUNDATIONS OF WESTERN LAWt Harold 1. Berman* I. THE WESTERN LEGAL TRADITION The Western legal tradition, like Western civilization as a whole, is under- going in the 20th century a crisis greater than any other in its history, since it is a crisis generated not only from within Western experience but also from without. From within, social, economic, and political transformations of un- precedented magnitude have put a tremendous strain upon traditional legal institutions and legal values in virtually all countries of the West. Yet there have been other periods of revolutionary upheaval in previous centuries, and we have somehow survived them. What is new is the confrontation with non- Western civilizations and non-Western philosophies. In the past, Western man has confidently carried his law with him throughout the world. The world today, however, is more suspicious than ever before of Western "legal- ism." Eastern man and Southern man offer other alternatives.
  • Paths of Western Law After Justinian

    Paths of Western Law After Justinian

    Pace University DigitalCommons@Pace Pace Law Faculty Publications School of Law January 2006 Paths of Western Law After Justinian M. Stuart Madden Pace Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty Recommended Citation Madden, M. Stuart, "Paths of Western Law After Justinian" (2006). Pace Law Faculty Publications. 130. https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty/130 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. M. Stuart add en^ Preparation of the Code of Justinian, one part of a three-part presentation of Roman law published over the three-year period from 533 -535 A.D, had not been stymied by the occupation of Rome by the Rugians and the Ostrogoths. In most ways these occupations worked no material hardship on the empire, either militarily or civilly. The occupying Goths and their Roman counterparts developed symbiotic legal and social relationships, and in several instances, the new Germanic rulers sought and received approval of their rule both from the Western Empire, seated in Constantinople, and the Pope. Rugian Odoacer and Ostrogoth Theodoric each, in fact, claimed respect for Roman law, and the latter ruler held the Roman title patricius et magister rnilitum. In sum, the Rugians and the Ostrogoths were content to absorb much of Roman law, and to work only such modifications as were propitious in the light of centuries of Gothic customary law.
  • Practical and Substantive Aspects of Subrogation

    Practical and Substantive Aspects of Subrogation

    PRACTICAL AND SUBSTANTIVE ASPECTS OF SUBROGATION Eric A. Dolden and Dan C. Richardson September 2015 [Author] © Dolden Wallace Folick LLP 1 CONTACT LAWYER Eric Dolden Dan Richardson 604.891.0350 604.891.5251 [email protected] [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTORY COMMENTS ....................................................................................4 II. STATUTORY AND CONTRACTUAL PROVISIONS RECOGNIZING THE RIGHT OF SUBROGATION ....................................................6 1. Statutory Right of Subrogation ...........................................................................6 2. Contractual Right of Subrogation .......................................................................8 III. PROHIBITIONS ON SUBROGATION ........................................................................11 1. The Insurer As “Volunteer” ..............................................................................11 2. Covenants To Insure - The "Doctrine Of Legal Immunity” ..........................21 (a) Commercial tenancies ............................................................................22 (b) The scope of a covenant to insure .........................................................38 (c) Covenants to insure in other commercial settings .............................40 (d) Covenants to insure and indemnification ...........................................43 (e) "Legal immunity" in the statutory setting ...........................................45 (f) The liability of employees: Greenwood Shopping Plaza
  • Asset Tracing and Recovery Reassessed

    Asset Tracing and Recovery Reassessed

    Asset tracing and recovery reassessed Nicole Sandells QC Miles Harris 4 New Square Professional Liability & Regulatory Conference 4 February 2020 This material was provided for the 4 New Square Professional Liability & Regulatory Conference on 4 February 2020. It was not intended for use and must not be relied upon in relation to any particular matter and does not constitute legal advice. It has now been provided without responsibility by its authors. 4 NEW SQUARE T: +44 (0) 207 822 2000 LINCOLN’S INN F: +44 (0) 207 822 2001 LONDON WC2A 3RJ DX: LDE 1041 WWW.4NEWSQUARE.COM E: [email protected] Nicole Sandells QC Call: 1994 Silk: 2018 Nicole's practice in recent years has focused heavily on financial and property law, civil fraud, restitution, trusts, probate and equitable remedies alongside Chambers' mainstream professional indemnity work. She has significant experience of unjust enrichment, subrogation, breach of trust and fiduciary duty claims. She is never happier than when finding novel answers to tricky problems. Nicole is described as ‘a mega-brain, with encyclopaedic legal knowledge and the ability to cut through complex legal issues with ease’ and 'a master tactician who is exceptionally bright and has a fantastic ability to condense significant evidential information' (Legal 500). Apparently, she is also “exceptionally bright and a ferocious advocate. She gives tactical advice and is a pleasure to work with. Clients speak extremely highly of her.” “If you want someone to think outside of the box and really come up with an innovative position, then she’s an excellent choice.” – Chambers & Partners, 2020 Professional Negligence.