Research Report 2015 Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Research Report 2015 Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin MPIMG Research Report 2015 Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin Max Planck Institute Underground / U-Bahn Bus routes / Buslinien for Molecular Genetics .U3/Oskar-Helene-Heim .M11, 110 - Ihnestr. 63–73 .U3/Thielplatz Saarge münder Str./ 14195 Berlin Urban rail system / S-Bahn Bitscher Str. Germany .S1 / Sundgauer Str. .X10, 115, 285 - Clayallee/Leichhardtstr. or Schützallee .M48, 101 - Berliner Straße/Holländische Genetics (MPIMG) Molecular Max Planck Institute for Report 2015 Research Mühle 4c_U1-U4_maxplanck_Titel_2015.indd 1 13.10.2015 14:29:25 Imprint | Research Report 2015 Published by the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics (MPIMG), Berlin, Germany, Oktober 2015 Editorial Board: Bernhard G. Herrmann & Martin Vingron Coordination: Patricia Marquardt Photos & Scientifi c Illustrations: MPIMG Production: Thomas Didier, Meta Druck Copies: 500 Contact: Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics Ihnestr. 63 – 73 14195 Berlin Germany Phone: +49 (0)30 8413-0 Fax: +49 (0)30 8413-1207 Email: [email protected] For further information about the MPIMG, see http://www.molgen.mpg.de Cover image 3D-rendered light sheet micrograph of the caudal end of an E9.5 mouse embryo illustrating the generation of neuroectoderm (green cells) and mesoderm (red cells) from common progenitor cells (yellow cells, mostly located deep in the tissue) during trunk development. The neuroectoderm gives rise to the spinal cord, the mesoderm to the vertebral column, skeletal muscles and other tissues. Picture taken by Frederic Koch, Manuela Scholze, and Matthias Marks, MPIMG. 44c_U1-U4_maxplanck_Titel_2015.inddc_U1-U4_maxplanck_Titel_2015.indd 2 113.10.20153.10.2015 114:29:264:29:26 MPI for Molecular Genetics Research Report 2015 1 Research Report 2015 Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics Berlin, September 2015 The Max Plank Institute for Molecular Genetics 2 Ada Yonath, Nobel laureate in chemistry 2009 and former member of the MPIMG, at the celebratory symposium on the occasion of the institute’s 50th anniversary in December 2014. MPI for Molecular Genetics Research Report 2015 Table of contents The Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics 7 Department of Developmental Genetics (B.G. Herrmann) 21 Introduction 22 Scientific achievements and findings 23 General information about the whole department 37 Department of Computational Molecular Biology (M. Vingron) 45 Introduction 45 Transcriptional Regulation Group (M. Vingron) 51 Sequencing & Genomics Group (S. Haas) 59 Bioinformatics Group (R. Herwig) 65 Diploid Genomics Group (M. Hoehe) 71 Mechanisms of Transcriptional Regulation Group (S. Meijsing) 79 Research Group Evolutionary Genomics (P. Arndt) 85 General information about the whole department 94 Research Group Development & Disease (S. Mundlos) 113 Introduction 114 Scientific achievements and findings 116 3 Chromosome Rearrangements & Disease group (V. Kalscheuer) 127 General information about the whole research group 133 Otto Warburg Laboratory Max Planck Research Group Epigenomics (H.-R. Chung) 153 Research Group RNA Bioinformatics (A. Marsico) 163 Sofja Kovalevskaja Research Group Long non-coding RNA (U.A. Ørom) 173 BMBF Research Group Nutrigenomics & Gene Regulation (S. Sauer) 183 Max Planck Research Group Regulatory Networks in Stem Cells (E. Schulz) 195 Max Planck Research Group Molecular Interaction Networks (U. Stelzl) 203 Research Group Gene Regulation and Systems Biology of Cancer (M.-L. Yaspo) 215 BMBF Research Group Cell Signaling Dynamics (Z. Zi) 229 Minerva Group Neurodegenerative disorders (S. Krobitsch) 235 The Max Plank Institute for Molecular Genetics Max Planck Fellow Group Efficient Algorithms for Omics Data (K. Reinert) 245 Emeritus Group Vertebrate Genomics (H. Lehrach) 255 Introduction 256 Scientific methods and achievements 259 Project groups within the department 260 General information about the whole department 264 Emeritus Group Human Molecular Genetics (H.-H. Ropers) 309 20 years of human genetics at the MPIMG 310 Scientific activities and results, 2012-2015 312 Epilogue 316 General information about the whole department 319 Scientific services Animal facility 343 Transgenic unit 345 Sequencing core facility 349 Mass spectrometry facility 365 4 Microscopy & Cryo-Electron Microscopy Group 373 IT Group 385 Library 395 Research Support Administration 397 Technical management & workshops 401 MPI for Molecular Genetics Research Report 2015 Foreword It is our pleasure to present the 2015 Research Report of the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics (MPIMG) in Berlin, covering the period from 2009 to mid-2015. Many changes have marked the last years. First of all, the retirement of Hans Lehrach und Hans-Hilger Ropers in late au- tumn of 2014 made a deep cut in our daily life at the institute. Two major departments were closed and many activities of the MPIMG are geared towards the appointment of new directors or are deferred until their arrival. On the other hand, a very positive development has taken place at the Otto Warburg laboratory with five new groups having started since 2011. In 2013, the construction of the long expected tower 3 has been finished and the bioinformaticians and computer scientists of the institute moved in. Immediately afterwards, the refurbishment of tower 2 commenced, promising new and state-of-the-art labs to all our “wet lab” scientists. All 5 refurbishment work as well as the construction of tower 3 has taken place during full research operations, which led to considerable disturbances, in particular of vibration-sensitive experimental work. Founded in 1964, the MPIMG marked its 50th anniversary in 2014 with a large celebratory symposium, bringing together many former and current scientists of the MPIMG. Today, the institute is established as a centre for research at the interface of genome research and genetics, concentrating on genome analysis of humans and other organisms to elucidate cellular processes and genetic diseases. Due to current developments, prompted by the search for two new directors within the institute as well as by the tech- nological advances of the last years, the focus of research at the MPIMG shifts towards the systematic study of gene regulation from a whole-ge- nome viewpoint, leading to the study of gene regulatory networks and their role in development and disease. With this report, we want to give a broad summary of the scientific work of the MPIMG during the last years and describe the ongoing changes. We hope that it will provide a clear im- pression of the institute and the work we are doing here. September 2015 Bernhard G. Herrmann & Martin Vingron The Max Plank Institute for Molecular Genetics 6 Scientific Advisory Board Board of Trustees Board of Directors Bernhard G. Herrmann, Martin Vingron, N.N., N.N. Scientific Coordination, Public Relations Administration, Research Support Patricia Marquardt Managing Director Christoph Krukenkamp Martin Vingron Technical Management & Administration Workshops Christoph Krukenkamp Ulf Bornemann Research Group Dept. of Max Planck Fellow Dept. of Computational Otto Warburg Scientific Services Development & Developmental New Dept. A New Dept. B Emeritus groups Knut Reinert Molecular Biology Christoph Krukenkamp Disease Genetics N.N. N.N. Laboratory Martin Vingron (Freie Universität Berlin) Stefan Mundlos Bernhard G. Herrmann Epigenomics Development & Disease Transcriptional Regulation Vertebrate Genomics Animal Facility Ho-Ryun Chung Stefan Mundlos Martin Vingron Hans Lehrach Ludger Hartmann (MPRG) Chromosome Rearrange- RNA Bioinformatics Sequencing & Genomics Human Molecular Genetics Transgenic Unit ments & Disease Annalisa Marsico Stefan Haas H.-Hilger Ropers Lars Wittler Vera Kalscheuer (MPIMG + FUB) Long Range Gene Long non-coding RNA Bioinformatics Sequencing Facility Regulation Ulf Ørom Ralf Herwig Bernd Timmermann Dario Lupianez (Humboldt Foundation) Regulatory Networks Diploid Genomics in Stem Cells Mass Spectrometry Institute of Medical Genetics Institute of Medical Genetics, Margret Hoehe Edda Schulz David Meierhofer and Human Genetics, Charité - Charité - Universitätsmedizin (MPRG/Minerva) Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Campus Virchow Campus Benjamin Franklin Molecular Mechanisms of Tran- Microscopy & Cryo Electron Interaction Networks Stefan Mundlos Bernhard G. Herrmann scriptional Regulation Microscopy Ulrich Stelzl Sebastiaan Meijsing Thorsten Mielke (MPRG) Gene Regulation & Systems IT Evolutionary Genomics Biology of Cancer Donald Buczek / Peter Peter Arndt Marie-Laure Yaspo Marquardt IMPRS on Computational Cell Signaling Dynamics Biology & Scientific Library Zhike Zi Computing Sylvia Elliger / Praxedis Leitner (BMBF) Fabian Feutlinske Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science, Freie Universität Berlin Figure 1: Organization chart of the MPIMG, September 2015 MPI for Molecular Genetics Research Report 2015 The Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics Structure and organization of the institute At the time of writing this report, the Max Planck Institute for Molecu- lar Genetics (MPIMG) is undergoing a major transition. In late autumn 2014, Hans Lehrach, head of the Department of Vertebrate Genomics, and Hans-Hilger Ropers, head of the Department of Human Molecular Genet- ics, retired and their departments had been closed. The institute together with the respective committee (the Stammkommission) of the Max Planck Society are actively searching for new directors. However, for the time be- ing, the MPIMG lacks two departments. Although we have tried to coun- teract the loss
Recommended publications
  • Download.Cse.Ucsc.Edu/ Early Age of Onset (~2.5 Years) of This PRA Form in Goldenpath/Canfam2/Database/) Using Standard Settings
    Kropatsch et al. Canine Genetics and Epidemiology (2016) 3:7 DOI 10.1186/s40575-016-0037-x RESEARCH Open Access A large deletion in RPGR causes XLPRA in Weimaraner dogs Regina Kropatsch1*, Denis A. Akkad1, Matthias Frank2, Carsten Rosenhagen3, Janine Altmüller4,5, Peter Nürnberg4,6,7, Jörg T. Epplen1,8 and Gabriele Dekomien1 Abstract Background: Progressive retinal atrophy (PRA) belongs to a group of inherited retinal disorders associated with gradual vision impairment due to degeneration of retinal photoreceptors in various dog breeds. PRA is highly heterogeneous, with autosomal dominant, recessive or X-linked modes of inheritance. In this study we used exome sequencing to investigate the molecular genetic basis of a new type of PRA, which occurred spontaneously in a litter of German short-hair Weimaraner dogs. Results: Whole exome sequencing in two PRA-affected Weimaraner dogs identified a large deletion comprising the first four exons of the X-linked retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR) gene known to be involved in human retinitis pigmentosa and canine PRA. Screening of 16 individuals in the corresponding pedigree of short-hair Weimaraners by qPCR, verified the deletion in hemizygous or heterozygous state in one male and six female dogs, respectively. The mutation was absent in 88 additional unrelated Weimaraners. The deletion was not detectable in the parents of one older female which transmitted the mutation to her offspring, indicating that the RPGR deletion represents a de novo mutation concerning only recent generations of the Weimaraner breed in Germany. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate the value of an existing DNA biobank combined with exome sequencing to identify the underlying genetic cause of a spontaneously occurring inherited disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Trans Esnps Infers Regulatory Network Architecture
    Analysis of trans eSNPs infers regulatory network architecture Anat Kreimer Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Anat Kreimer All rights reserved ABSTRACT Analysis of trans eSNPs infers regulatory network architecture Anat Kreimer eSNPs are genetic variants associated with transcript expression levels. The characteristics of such variants highlight their importance and present a unique opportunity for studying gene regulation. eSNPs affect most genes and their cell type specificity can shed light on different processes that are activated in each cell. They can identify functional variants by connecting SNPs that are implicated in disease to a molecular mechanism. Examining eSNPs that are associated with distal genes can provide insights regarding the inference of regulatory networks but also presents challenges due to the high statistical burden of multiple testing. Such association studies allow: simultaneous investigation of many gene expression phenotypes without assuming any prior knowledge and identification of unknown regulators of gene expression while uncovering directionality. This thesis will focus on such distal eSNPs to map regulatory interactions between different loci and expose the architecture of the regulatory network defined by such interactions. We develop novel computational approaches and apply them to genetics-genomics data in human. We go beyond pairwise interactions to define network motifs, including regulatory modules and bi-fan structures, showing them to be prevalent in real data and exposing distinct attributes of such arrangements. We project eSNP associations onto a protein-protein interaction network to expose topological properties of eSNPs and their targets and highlight different modes of distal regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Janus-Like Role of Proline Metabolism in Cancer Lynsey Burke1,Innaguterman1, Raquel Palacios Gallego1, Robert G
    Burke et al. Cell Death Discovery (2020) 6:104 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-020-00341-8 Cell Death Discovery REVIEW ARTICLE Open Access The Janus-like role of proline metabolism in cancer Lynsey Burke1,InnaGuterman1, Raquel Palacios Gallego1, Robert G. Britton1, Daniel Burschowsky2, Cristina Tufarelli1 and Alessandro Rufini1 Abstract The metabolism of the non-essential amino acid L-proline is emerging as a key pathway in the metabolic rewiring that sustains cancer cells proliferation, survival and metastatic spread. Pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase (PYCR) and proline dehydrogenase (PRODH) enzymes, which catalyze the last step in proline biosynthesis and the first step of its catabolism, respectively, have been extensively associated with the progression of several malignancies, and have been exposed as potential targets for anticancer drug development. As investigations into the links between proline metabolism and cancer accumulate, the complexity, and sometimes contradictory nature of this interaction emerge. It is clear that the role of proline metabolism enzymes in cancer depends on tumor type, with different cancers and cancer-related phenotypes displaying different dependencies on these enzymes. Unexpectedly, the outcome of rewiring proline metabolism also differs between conditions of nutrient and oxygen limitation. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of proline metabolism in cancer; we collate the experimental evidence that links proline metabolism with the different aspects of cancer progression and critically discuss the potential mechanisms involved. ● How is the rewiring of proline metabolism regulated Facts depending on cancer type and cancer subtype? 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; ● Is it possible to develop successful pharmacological ● Proline metabolism is widely rewired during cancer inhibitor of proline metabolism enzymes for development.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Is BOK Required for Apoptosis Induced by Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress?
    LETTER Is BOK required for apoptosis induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress? LETTER Yuniel Fernandez-Marreroa, Francine Keb,c, Nohemy Echeverrya,1, Philippe Bouilletb,c, Daniel Bachmanna, Andreas Strasserb,c, and Thomas Kaufmanna,2 The B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2)-related ovarian killer comparable Chop levels). Given the critical role of BIM (BOK) shares sequence homology with the proapo- in ER stress-induced apoptosis, this reduction of Bim ptotic BCL-2 family members BAX and BAK. However, may fully account for the reported resistance to ER −/− Bok cells are not protected from classic apoptotic stress. It is unclear whether this reduction of Bim is par- triggers and evidence for a proapoptotic role of BOK ticular to these SV40 MEFs, which are prone to line-to- is derived mostly from overexpression studies (1). BOK line variations within the one genotype, or whether this localizes preferentially to the endoplasmic reticulum is also seen in primary cells (e.g., primary MEFs, which (ER) membrane, where it interacts with IP3-receptors were used for some experiments) from these mice. Im- −/− (2, 3). Using cells from their newly generated Bok portantly, we did not observe significant changes in Bim −/− mouse strain, Carpio et al. propose that BOK is a crit- levels in SV40 MEFs or tissues from our Bok mice (Fig. ical inducer of BAX/BAK-dependent apoptosis in re- 1A). Overall, our analysis of SV40 MEFs, primary MEFs, sponse to ER stress (4). This proposal is in contrast to myeloid progenitors, mast cells, and primary neutrophils our earlier report, in which we showed that loss of BOK did not support a proapoptotic role of BOK downstream did not confer resistance toward ER stress in several of ER stress (2) (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • BCL-2 Family Proteins: Changing Partners in the Dance Towards Death
    Cell Death and Differentiation (2018) 25, 65–80 OPEN Official journal of the Cell Death Differentiation Association www.nature.com/cdd Review BCL-2 family proteins: changing partners in the dance towards death Justin Kale1, Elizabeth J Osterlund1,2 and David W Andrews*,1,2,3 The BCL-2 family of proteins controls cell death primarily by direct binding interactions that regulate mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) leading to the irreversible release of intermembrane space proteins, subsequent caspase activation and apoptosis. The affinities and relative abundance of the BCL-2 family proteins dictate the predominate interactions between anti-apoptotic and pro-apoptotic BCL-2 family proteins that regulate MOMP. We highlight the core mechanisms of BCL-2 family regulation of MOMP with an emphasis on how the interactions between the BCL-2 family proteins govern cell fate. We address the critical importance of both the concentration and affinities of BCL-2 family proteins and show how differences in either can greatly change the outcome. Further, we explain the importance of using full-length BCL-2 family proteins (versus truncated versions or peptides) to parse out the core mechanisms of MOMP regulation by the BCL-2 family. Finally, we discuss how post- translational modifications and differing intracellular localizations alter the mechanisms of apoptosis regulation by BCL-2 family proteins. Successful therapeutic intervention of MOMP regulation in human disease requires an understanding of the factors that mediate the major binding interactions between BCL-2 family proteins in cells. Cell Death and Differentiation (2018) 25, 65–80; doi:10.1038/cdd.2017.186; published online 17 November 2017 The membrane plays an active role in most BCL-2 family interactions by changing the affinities and local relative abundance of these proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • STRING V10: Protein–Protein Interaction Networks, Integrated
    Published online 28 October 2014 Nucleic Acids Research, 2015, Vol. 43, Database issue D447–D452 doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1003 STRING v10: protein–protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life Damian Szklarczyk1, Andrea Franceschini1, Stefan Wyder1, Kristoffer Forslund2, Davide Heller1, Jaime Huerta-Cepas2, Milan Simonovic1, Alexander Roth1, Alberto Santos3, Kalliopi P. Tsafou3, Michael Kuhn4,5, Peer Bork2,*, Lars J. Jensen3,* and Christian von Mering1,* 1Institute of Molecular Life Sciences and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland, 2European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany, 3Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark, 4Biotechnology Center, Technische Universitat¨ Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany and 5Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Downloaded from Genetics, 01062 Dresden, Germany Received September 15, 2014; Accepted October 07, 2014 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/ The many functional partnerships and interactions For a full description of a protein’s function, knowledge that occur between proteins are at the core of cel- about its specific interaction partners is an important pre- lular processing and their systematic characteriza- requisite. The concept of protein ‘function’ is somewhat hi- tion helps to provide context in molecular systems erarchical (1–4), and at all levels in this hierarchy, interac- biology. However, known and predicted interactions tions between proteins help to describe and narrow down a protein’s function: its three-dimensional structure may are scattered over multiple resources, and the avail- become meaningful only in the context of a larger pro- able data exhibit notable differences in terms of qual- tein assembly, its molecular actions may be regulated by at University of Aarhus on January 22, 2015 ity and completeness.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontology-Based Methods for Analyzing Life Science Data
    Habilitation a` Diriger des Recherches pr´esent´ee par Olivier Dameron Ontology-based methods for analyzing life science data Soutenue publiquement le 11 janvier 2016 devant le jury compos´ede Anita Burgun Professeur, Universit´eRen´eDescartes Paris Examinatrice Marie-Dominique Devignes Charg´eede recherches CNRS, LORIA Nancy Examinatrice Michel Dumontier Associate professor, Stanford University USA Rapporteur Christine Froidevaux Professeur, Universit´eParis Sud Rapporteure Fabien Gandon Directeur de recherches, Inria Sophia-Antipolis Rapporteur Anne Siegel Directrice de recherches CNRS, IRISA Rennes Examinatrice Alexandre Termier Professeur, Universit´ede Rennes 1 Examinateur 2 Contents 1 Introduction 9 1.1 Context ......................................... 10 1.2 Challenges . 11 1.3 Summary of the contributions . 14 1.4 Organization of the manuscript . 18 2 Reasoning based on hierarchies 21 2.1 Principle......................................... 21 2.1.1 RDF for describing data . 21 2.1.2 RDFS for describing types . 24 2.1.3 RDFS entailments . 26 2.1.4 Typical uses of RDFS entailments in life science . 26 2.1.5 Synthesis . 30 2.2 Case study: integrating diseases and pathways . 31 2.2.1 Context . 31 2.2.2 Objective . 32 2.2.3 Linking pathways and diseases using GO, KO and SNOMED-CT . 32 2.2.4 Querying associated diseases and pathways . 33 2.3 Methodology: Web services composition . 39 2.3.1 Context . 39 2.3.2 Objective . 40 2.3.3 Semantic compatibility of services parameters . 40 2.3.4 Algorithm for pairing services parameters . 40 2.4 Application: ontology-based query expansion with GO2PUB . 43 2.4.1 Context . 43 2.4.2 Objective .
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI)
    Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) m kg s cd SI mol K A NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Ambler Thompson and Barry N. Taylor NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Ambler Thompson Technology Services and Barry N. Taylor Physics Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, 1995 Edition, April 1995) March 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology James M. Turner, Acting Director National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 811, 2008 Edition (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, April 1995 Edition) Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 811, 2008 Ed., 85 pages (March 2008; 2nd printing November 2008) CODEN: NSPUE3 Note on 2nd printing: This 2nd printing dated November 2008 of NIST SP811 corrects a number of minor typographical errors present in the 1st printing dated March 2008. Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Preface The International System of Units, universally abbreviated SI (from the French Le Système International d’Unités), is the modern metric system of measurement. Long the dominant measurement system used in science, the SI is becoming the dominant measurement system used in international commerce. The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of August 1988 [Public Law (PL) 100-418] changed the name of the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and gave to NIST the added task of helping U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Disruption of Chromatin Organisation Causes
    Yauy et al. BMC Medical Genomics (2019) 12:116 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-019-0558-8 CASE REPORT Open Access Disruption of chromatin organisation causes MEF2C gene overexpression in intellectual disability: a case report Kevin Yauy1, Anouck Schneider1, Bee Ling Ng2, Jean-Baptiste Gaillard1, Satish Sati3, Christine Coubes4, Constance Wells4, Magali Tournaire1, Thomas Guignard1, Pauline Bouret1, David Geneviève4, Jacques Puechberty4, Franck Pellestor1 and Vincent Gatinois1* Abstract Background: Balanced structural variants are mostly described in disease with gene disruption or subtle rearrangement at breakpoints. Case presentation: Here we report a patient with mild intellectual deficiency who carries a de novo balanced translocation t(3;5). Breakpoints were fully explored by microarray, Array Painting and Sanger sequencing. No gene disruption was found but the chromosome 5 breakpoint was localized 228-kb upstream of the MEF2C gene. The predicted Topologically Associated Domains analysis shows that it contains only the MEF2C gene and a long non- coding RNA LINC01226. RNA studies looking for MEF2C gene expression revealed an overexpression of MEF2C in the lymphoblastoid cell line of the patient. Conclusions: Pathogenicity of MEF2C overexpression is still unclear as only four patients with mild intellectual deficiency carrying 5q14.3 microduplications containing MEF2C are described in the literature. The microduplications in these individuals also contain other genes expressed in the brain. The patient presented the same phenotype as 5q14.3 microduplication patients. We report the first case of a balanced translocation leading to an overexpression of MEF2C similar to a functional duplication. Keywords: Intellectual disability (ID), Topologically associated domains (TAD), MEF2C Background genes [6], formation of a fusion gene with a novel func- Intellectual disability (ID) is a common disorder affect- tion [7] or perturbation of gene expression (previously ing up to 3% of the population [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report 2006 Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin Imprint | Research Report 2006
    MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR GENETICS Research Report 2006 Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin Imprint | Research Report 2006 Published by the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics (MPIMG), Berlin, Germany, August 2006 Editorial Board Bernhard Herrmann, Hans Lehrach, H.-Hilger Ropers, Martin Vingron Coordination Claudia Falter, Ingrid Stark Design & Production UNICOM Werbeagentur GmbH, Berlin Number of copies: 1,500 Photos Katrin Ullrich, MPIMG; David Ausserhofer Contact Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics Ihnestr. 63–73 14195 Berlin, Germany Phone: +49 (0)30-8413 - 0 Fax: +49 (0)30-8413 - 1207 Email: [email protected] For further information about the MPIMG please see our website: www.molgen.mpg.de MPI for Molecular Genetics Research Report 2006 Table of Contents The Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics . 4 • Organisational Structure. 4 • MPIMG – Mission, Development of the Institute, Research Concept. .5 Department of Developmental Genetics (Bernhard Herrmann) . 7 • Transmission ratio distortion (Hermann Bauer) . .11 • Signal Transduction in Embryogenesis and Tumor Progression (Markus Morkel). 14 • Development of Endodermal Organs (Heiner Schrewe) . 16 • Gene Expression and 3D-Reconstruction (Ralf Spörle). 18 • Somitogenesis (Lars Wittler). 21 Department of Vertebrate Genomics (Hans Lehrach) . 25 • Molecular Embryology and Aging (James Adjaye). .31 • Protein Expression and Protein Structure (Konrad Büssow). .34 • Mass Spectrometry (Johan Gobom). 37 • Bioinformatics (Ralf Herwig). .40 • Comparative and Functional Genomics (Heinz Himmelbauer). 44 • Genetic Variation (Margret Hoehe). 48 • Cell Arrays/Oligofingerprinting (Michal Janitz). .52 • Kinetic Modeling (Edda Klipp) . .56 • In Vitro Ligand Screening (Zoltán Konthur). .60 • Neurodegenerative Disorders (Sylvia Krobitsch). .64 • Protein Complexes & Cell Organelle Assembly/ USN (Bodo Lange/Thorsten Mielke). .67 • Automation & Technology Development (Hans Lehrach).
    [Show full text]
  • X-Linked Diseases: Susceptible Females
    REVIEW ARTICLE X-linked diseases: susceptible females Barbara R. Migeon, MD 1 The role of X-inactivation is often ignored as a prime cause of sex data include reasons why women are often protected from the differences in disease. Yet, the way males and females express their deleterious variants carried on their X chromosome, and the factors X-linked genes has a major role in the dissimilar phenotypes that that render women susceptible in some instances. underlie many rare and common disorders, such as intellectual deficiency, epilepsy, congenital abnormalities, and diseases of the Genetics in Medicine (2020) 22:1156–1174; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436- heart, blood, skin, muscle, and bones. Summarized here are many 020-0779-4 examples of the different presentations in males and females. Other INTRODUCTION SEX DIFFERENCES ARE DUE TO X-INACTIVATION Sex differences in human disease are usually attributed to The sex differences in the effect of X-linked pathologic variants sex specific life experiences, and sex hormones that is due to our method of X chromosome dosage compensation, influence the function of susceptible genes throughout the called X-inactivation;9 humans and most placental mammals – genome.1 5 Such factors do account for some dissimilarities. compensate for the sex difference in number of X chromosomes However, a major cause of sex-determined expression of (that is, XX females versus XY males) by transcribing only one disease has to do with differences in how males and females of the two female X chromosomes. X-inactivation silences all X transcribe their gene-rich human X chromosomes, which is chromosomes but one; therefore, both males and females have a often underappreciated as a cause of sex differences in single active X.10,11 disease.6 Males are the usual ones affected by X-linked For 46 XY males, that X is the only one they have; it always pathogenic variants.6 Females are biologically superior; a comes from their mother, as fathers contribute their Y female usually has no disease, or much less severe disease chromosome.
    [Show full text]