Federal Register/Vol. 74, No. 55/Tuesday, March 24

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 24, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 12245 Effective Date (425) 917–6421; fax (425) 917–6590; has the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if effective April 28, 2009. requested using the procedures found in 14 Federal Aviation Administration CFR 39.19. Affected ADs (2) To request a different method of 14 CFR Part 39 (b) None. compliance or a different compliance time [Docket No. FAA–2008–1361; Directorate Applicability for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR Identifier 2008–NM–140–AD; Amendment (c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 767– 39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on 39–15858; AD 2009–06–21] 200 and 767–300 series airplanes, certificated any airplane to which the AMOC applies, in any category; as identified in Boeing Alert notify your appropriate principal inspector RIN 2120–AA64 Service Bulletin 767–53A0147, dated August (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District 16, 2007. Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC–8–102, –103, and –106 Unsafe Condition FSDO. (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable Airplanes, and Model DHC–8–200, (d) This AD results from analysis that level of safety may be used for any repair –300, and –400 Series Airplanes indicates fatigue cracks of the web lap splice, tear strap splice, or super tear strap splice of required by this AD, if it is approved by an AGENCY: Federal Aviation the aft bulkhead are expected to occur on Authorized Representative for the Boeing Administration (FAA), Department of certain Boeing Model 767–200 and 767–300 Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option Transportation (DOT). Authorization Organization who has been series airplanes. We are proposing this AD to ACTION: Final rule. detect and correct fatigue cracks of the aft authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to pressure bulkhead, which could result in make those findings. For a repair method to SUMMARY: We are adopting a new rapid decompression of the passenger be approved, the repair must meet the airworthiness directive (AD) for the compartment and possible damage or certification basis of the airplane and the products listed above. This AD results interference with airplane control systems approval must specifically refer to this AD. that penetrate the bulkhead, and consequent from mandatory continuing (4) Inspections of repaired areas approved loss of controllability of the airplane. airworthiness information (MCAI) as an AMOC for the inspection requirements originated by an aviation authority of Compliance of this AD are also approved as an AMOC to another country to identify and correct (e) Comply with this AD within the the inspections for the repaired areas only as an unsafe condition on an aviation compliance times specified, unless already required by paragraph (d) of AD 2003–18–10. product. The MCAI describes the unsafe done. Material Incorporated by Reference condition as: Inspections and Applicable Related A fuselage spoiler cable disconnect sensing Investigative and Corrective Actions (h) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–53A0147, dated August 16, device was installed in production on later (f) Except as provided by paragraphs (f)(1) 2007, to do the actions required by this AD, DHC–8 Series 100/200/300 aircraft, and on and (f)(2) of this AD: At the applicable all DHC–8 Series 400 aircraft. On earlier unless the AD specifies otherwise. compliance time and repeat intervals listed DHC–8 Series 100/200/300 aircraft, its in Tables 1 and 2 of paragraph 1.E., (1) The Director of the Federal Register installation was mandated by [Canadian] ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service approved the incorporation by reference of Airworthiness Directive CF–2006–13 [which Bulletin 767–53A0147, dated August 16, this service information under 5 U.S.C. corresponds to FAA AD 2007–21–16]. 2007, do detailed inspections of the aft 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. However, several incorrectly assembled pressure bulkhead for damage, mid- (2) For service information identified in spoiler cable disconnect sensing devices have frequency eddy current (MFEC) and low this AD, contact Boeing Commercial recently been discovered on in-service frequency eddy current (LFEC) inspections of Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services aircraft. A pulley and plastic spacer had been radial web lap splices, tear strap splices, and Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, inadvertently interchanged during assembly super tear strap splices for cracking, and Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone of the device in production, resulting in the applicable corrective actions, by 206–544–5000, extension 1, fax 206–766– spoiler cable sliding on the spacer rather than accomplishing all the applicable actions on the pulley, as designed. 5680; e-mail [email protected]; specified in the Accomplishment Continued operation with an incorrectly Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. Instructions of the service bulletin. assembled spoiler cable disconnect sensing (1) Where Table 1 of paragraph 1.E., (3) You may review copies of the service device could result in impaired operation of ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane the sensing device and/or an eventual Bulletin 767–53A0147, dated August 16, Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, fuselage spoiler cable disconnect, with 2007, specifies a compliance time after the Washington. For information on the possible reduced controllability of the date on that service bulletin, this AD requires availability of this material at the FAA, call aircraft. compliance within the specified compliance 425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152. We are issuing this AD to require time after the effective date of this AD. (4) You may also review copies of the (2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin actions to correct the unsafe condition service information that is incorporated by 767–53A0147, dated August 16, 2007, on these products. reference at the National Archives and specifies a compliance time of ‘‘As given by DATES: This AD becomes effective April Boeing’’ or to contact Boeing for the Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this 28, 2009. appropriate action, this AD requires, before The Director of the Federal Register further flight, inspections of the area of repair material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go and repair of any damaged/cracked part, as to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/ approved the incorporation by reference applicable, using a method approved in code_of_federal_regulations/ibr of certain publications listed in this AD accordance with the procedures specified in _locations.html. as of April 28, 2009. paragraph (g) of this AD. ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD Issued in Renton, Washington, on March docket on the Internet at http:// Alternative Methods of Compliance 12, 2009. (AMOCs) www.regulations.gov or in person at the Ali Bahrami, U.S. Department of Transportation, (g)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Certification Office (ACO), FAA, ATTN: Docket Operations, M–30, West Aircraft Certification Service. Tamara L. Anderson, Aerospace Engineer, Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, 1601 Lind [FR Doc. E9–5961 Filed 3–23–09; 8:45 am] 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington telephone BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Washington, DC. VerDate Nov<24>2008 01:02 Mar 24, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM 24MRR1 mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES 12246 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 24, 2009 / Rules and Regulations FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan We determined that this change will not For the reasons discussed above, I Parrillo, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe increase the economic burden on any certify this AD: and Propulsion Branch, ANE–171, FAA, operator or increase the scope of the AD. 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory New York Aircraft Certification Office, action’’ under Executive Order 12866; Differences Between This AD and the 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the MCAI or Service Information Westbury, New York 11590; telephone DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (516) 228–7305; fax (516) 794–5531. We have reviewed the MCAI and (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: related service information and, in 3. Will not have a significant general, agree with their substance. But economic impact, positive or negative, Discussion we might have found it necessary to use on a substantial number of small entities We issued a notice of proposed different words from those in the MCAI under the criteria of the Regulatory rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. Flexibility Act. part 39 to include an AD that would operators and is enforceable. In making We prepared a regulatory evaluation apply to the specified products. That these changes, we do not intend to differ of the estimated costs to comply with NPRM was published in the Federal substantively from the information this AD and placed it in the AD docket. Register on January 12, 2009 (74 FR provided in the MCAI and related Examining the AD Docket 1164). That NPRM proposed to correct service information. You may examine the AD docket on an unsafe condition for the specified We might also have required different the Internet at http:// products. The MCAI states: actions in this AD from those in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA www.regulations.gov; or in person at the A fuselage spoiler cable disconnect sensing policies. Any such differences are Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. device was installed in production on later highlighted in a NOTE within the AD. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, DHC–8 Series 100/200/300 aircraft, and on except Federal holidays.
Recommended publications
  • DHC-8-402, G-FLBE No & Type of Engines

    DHC-8-402, G-FLBE No & Type of Engines

    AAIB Bulletin G-FLBE AAIB-26260 SERIOUS INCIDENT Aircraft Type and Registration: DHC-8-402, G-FLBE No & Type of Engines: 2 Pratt & Whitney Canada PW150A turboprop engines Year of Manufacture: 2009 (Serial no: 4261) Date & Time (UTC): 14 November 2019 at 1950 hrs Location: In-flight from Newquay Airport to London Heathrow Airport Type of Flight: Commercial Air Transport (Passenger) Persons on Board: Crew - 4 Passengers - 59 Injuries: Crew - None Passengers - None Nature of Damage: Aileron cable broke Commander’s Licence: Airline Transport Pilot’s Licence Commander’s Age: 51 years Commander’s Flying Experience: 8,778 hours (of which 5,257 were on type) Last 90 days - 150 hours Last 28 days - 33 hours Information Source: AAIB Field Investigation Synopsis Shortly after takeoff in a strong crosswind, the pilots noticed that both handwheels1 were offset to the right in order to maintain wings level flight. The aircraft diverted to Exeter Airport where it made an uneventful landing. The handwheel offset was the result of a break in a left aileron cable that ran along the wing rear spar. In the course of this investigation it was discovered that the right aileron on G-FLBE, and other aircraft in the operator’s fleet, would occasionally not respond to the movement of the handwheels. Non-reversible filters were also fitted to the operator’s aircraft that meant that it was not always possible to reconstruct the actual positions of the control wheel, column or rudder pedals recorded by the Flight Data Recorder. The aircraft manufacturer initiated safety actions to improve the maintenance of control cables and to determine the extent of the unresponsive ailerons across the fleet.
  • Delta Air Lines Flight 1086 ALPA Submission

    Delta Air Lines Flight 1086 ALPA Submission

    Submission of the Air Line Pilots Association, International to the National Transportation Safety Board Regarding the Accident Involving Delta Air Lines 1086 MD-88 DCA15FA085 New York, NY March 5, 2015 Air Line Pilots Association, International Delta Air Lines 1086 Submission Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.0 Factual Information ................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 History of Flight ............................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Operations .............................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Weather ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Regulations for Dispatching an Aircraft ........................................................................... 5 2.3 Crew Expectation of Runway Condition .......................................................................... 6 2.4 Approach ......................................................................................................................... 6 2.5 Landing Distance Assessment .......................................................................................... 7 2.6 Runway Condition on the Pier ........................................................................................
  • Aircraft Composite Spoiler Fitting Design Using the Variable Density Model

    Aircraft Composite Spoiler Fitting Design Using the Variable Density Model

    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Computer Science 65 ( 2015 ) 99 – 106 International Conference on Communication, Management and Information Technology (ICCMIT 2015) Aircraft composite spoiler fitting design using the variable density model V.A. Komarov*, E.A. Kishov, E.I. Kurkin, R.V. Charkviani Samara State Aerospace University (SSAU), 34, Moskovskoe shosse, Samara, 443086, Russia Abstract Present paper describes a problem of a fitting unit design for transferring the high concentrated forces to thin-walled layered composite airframe structures. The using of variable density model is offered as new mathematical model for the solution of topology optimization problems. The offered technique is illustrated by the fitting brought to production and carrying out its successful static and resource tests. The resulting optimized aircraft spoiler fitting design has weight twice less than its initial design version obtained without using the variable density model. © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (©http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. ). PeerPeer-review-review under under responsibility responsibility of Universal of Universal Society Society for Applied for AppliedResearch. Research Keywords: load trasferring path; topology optimization; design;spoiler fitting; airframe structures; variable density model. 1. Introduction The using of vacuum infusion or RTM technology is applied for elements of mechanization of aircraft structures1. Thus it is possible to get the finished structure ”in-one-shot”. The experience of the long-range passenger aircraft spoiler design showed that it can be made by the one integral detail using composite materials.
  • Numerical Simulation Around Wing Control Surfaces

    Numerical Simulation Around Wing Control Surfaces

    24TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS AROUND WING CONTROL SURFACES Guillaume Fillola AIRBUS, Toulouse, Fr Marie-Claire Le Pape Marc Montagnac ONERA, Châtillon, Fr CERFACS, Toulouse, Fr Keywords: Aileron, Spoiler, Chimera Mesh, Patched Grid, Wall Law ABSTRACT ych Adimensioned coordinate y by half span, A study of wing control surface effectiveness =(y-yroot)/b was carried out using numerical simulations chz Local load in z direction with the advanced Reynolds Averaged Navier- Stokes solver elsA. Non-coincident meshing 1 INTRODUCTION techniques were used as to make the mesh generation process more flexible. The first The correct prediction of handling qualities application attempts to predict an aileron and hinge moments induced by the deployment effectiveness using the patched grid meshing of wing control surfaces (spoilers and ailerons) technique combined with a mesh deformation is a crucial point in the general aircraft sizing tool in order to operate the aileron deflection. process with a strong impact on the final aircraft The second one deals with spoiler deployment weight. The complexity of the aerodynamic and involves the Chimera technique, which flows around deployed control surfaces and the allows separating the spoiler meshing from the importance of the flight envelope to be covered wing meshing and so avoiding a complete mesh made difficult the use of CFD in the elaboration re-generation for each spoiler deflection. of Aerodynamic Data. Until now, only very time-consuming and costly wind tunnel tests and not very accurate semi-empirical methods NOMENCLATURE were used. For a long time, CFD has been intensively a Angle of attack used at Airbus for shape design and Sideslip angle b optimization.
  • Trailing Vortex Attenuation Devices

    Trailing Vortex Attenuation Devices

    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1985 Trailing vortex attenuation devices. Heffernan, Kenneth G. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/21590 DUDLEY KNOX LIBRARY NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA 93^43 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS TRAILING VORTEX ATTENUATION DEVICES by Kenneth G. Heffernan June 1985 Thesis Advisor: T. Sarpkaya Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited, T223063 Unclassified SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (Whan Data Entered) REPORT READ INSTRUCTIONS DOCUMENTATION PAGE BEFORE COMPLETING FORM 1. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER 4. TITLE (and Subtitle) 5. TYPE OF REPORT A PERIOD COVERED Dual Master's Thesis; Trailing Vortex Attenuation Devices June 1985 S. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER 7. AUTHORC»> 8. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBERC*.) Kenneth G. Heffernan 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND AODRESS 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT. PROJECT, TASK AREA & WORK UNIT NUMBERS Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California 93943 I. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE June 1985 Naval Postgraduate Schodl 13. NUMBER OF PAGES Monterey, California 93943 109 U. MONITORING AGENCY NAME 4 ADDRESSf/f different from Controlling OHicm) 15. SECURITY CLASS, (ol (his report) Unclassified 15a. DECLASSIFICATION/ DOWNGRADING SCHEDULE 16. DISTRIBUTION ST ATEMEN T (of this Report) Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (ol the abstract entered In Block 20, If different from Report) 18. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 19. KEY WORDS (Continue on reverse aide It necessary and Identify by block number) Trailing Vortices 20. ABSTRACT fConl/nu» on reverse side It necessary and Identity by block number) Trailing vortices generated by large aircraft pose a serious hazard to other planes.
  • C. Yeh – Airbus Fly-By-Wire Computers: A320-A350

    C. Yeh – Airbus Fly-By-Wire Computers: A320-A350

    Airbus Fly-By-Wire Computers A320 – A350 Ying Chin (Bob) Yeh, Ph. D., IEEE Fellow Technical Fellow Flight Controls Systems Boeing Commercial Airplanes IEEE ComSoc Technical Committee on Communication Quality & Reliability Emerging Technology Reliability Roundtable Stevenson, WA, USA, May 9, 2016 Non-technical / Administrative Data Only. Not subject to EAR or ITAR Export Regulations Airbus (and French) Organizations for Airbus FBW Computers ° Research In 1970, French government modeled SRI International and MIT DraperLabs to create LAAS CNRS research institute for Computing System Technology, with a work force of 750. A sub-group, Informatique crtique (dependable computing), has been the main research arm for Airbus FC, consisting of ~20 Ph.D researchers. This group is the computer architect for A320 FBW Computers. ° Platform Design After A320, Airbus creates EYY group to MAKE FBW Computers and being responsible for FBW Computers, Warning Electronics, and Maintenance. 2 Airbus Fly-By-Wire Computers Design Philosophy • Active-Standby control of an actuator for a control surface with multiple actuators, other actuators in By-Pass Mode • Active-Passive control of an actuator among Flight Control Computer channels: upon detecting loss of an active computer channel commands, the passive computer will become active • Self Monitor computer channel, with Command Lane and Monitor Lane 3 An example of Airbus FBW COM/MON-based Monitoring 4 Evolution of Airbus FBW Computers • A320 (Architect: LAAS, Platforms: Thompson CSF and Sfena, now Thales) Dual-Dual
  • Approaches to Assure Safety in Fly-By-Wire Systems: Airbus Vs

    Approaches to Assure Safety in Fly-By-Wire Systems: Airbus Vs

    APPROACHES TO ASSURE SAFETY IN FLY-BY-WIRE SYSTEMS: AIRBUS VS. BOEING Andrew J. Kornecki, Kimberley Hall Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach, FL USA <[email protected]> ABSTRACT The aircraft manufacturers examined for this paper are Fly-by-wire (FBW) is a flight control system using Airbus Industries and The Boeing Company. The entire computers and relatively light electrical wires to replace Airbus production line starting with A320 and the Boeing conventional direct mechanical linkage between a pilot’s 777 utilize fly-by-wire technology. cockpit controls and moving surfaces. FBW systems have been in use in guided missiles and subsequently in The first section of the paper presents an overview of military aircraft. The delay in commercial aircraft FBW technology highlighting the issues associated with implementation was due to the time required to develop its use. The second and third sections address the appropriate failure survival technologies providing an approaches used by Airbus and Boeing, respectively. In adequate level of safety, reliability and availability. each section, the nature of the FBW implementation and Software generation contributes significantly to the total the human-computer interaction issues that result from engineering development cost of the high integrity digital these implementations for specific aircraft are addressed. FBW systems. Issues related to software and redundancy Specific examples of software-related safety features, techniques are discussed. The leading commercial aircraft such as flight envelope limits, are discussed. The final manufacturers, such as Airbus and Boeing, exploit FBW section compares the approaches and general conclusions controls in their civil airliners. The paper presents their regarding the use of FBW technology.
  • Wingtip Vortex Alleviation Using a Reverse Delta Type Add-On Device

    Wingtip Vortex Alleviation Using a Reverse Delta Type Add-On Device

    International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace Volume 4 Issue 3 Article 7 9-2-2017 Wingtip Vortex Alleviation Using a Reverse Delta Type Add-on Device Afaq Altaf New York Institute of Technology, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/ijaaa Part of the Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Altaf, A. (2017). Wingtip Vortex Alleviation Using a Reverse Delta Type Add-on Device. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2017.1178 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wingtip Vortex Alleviation Using a Reverse Delta Type Add-on Device Cover Page Footnote The author is indebted to International Islamic University Malaysia and Monash University Malaysia for supporting this work. This article is available in International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace: https://commons.erau.edu/ ijaaa/vol4/iss3/7 Altaf: Wingtip Vortex Alleviation Using a Reverse Delta Type Add-on Device Due to continuous air traffic growth, existing separation rules are becoming extremely insufficient at coping with future air traffic requirements. This study is driven by the objective of reducing the present air traffic spacing, while sustaining the same level of safety. All aircraft create wake vortices, an unavoidable result of the creation of lift. Vortices from wingtips have been observed to persist for many miles.
  • Aero-Acoustic Performance of Fractal Spoilers

    Aero-Acoustic Performance of Fractal Spoilers

    Aero-acoustic performance of fractal spoilers J. Nedic´∗, B. Ganapathisubramaniy, J.C. Vassilicosz Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK J. Boree´ x, L.E. Brizzix, A. Spohn{ Institut P’, CNRS•ENSMA•Universite´ de Poitiers, BP 40109, 86961 Futuroscope Chasseneuil, France One of the major environmental problems facing the aviation industry is that of aircraft noise. The work presented in this paper, done as part of the EU’s OPENAIR Project, looks at reducing spoiler noise whilst maintaining aerodynamic performance, through means of large-scale fractal porosity. It is hypothesised that the highly turbulent flow generated by fractal grids from the way the multiple-length-scales are organised in space, would reduce the impact of the re-circulation region and with it, the low frequency noise it generates. In its place, a higher frequency noise is introduced which is more susceptible to atmospheric attenuation and is less offensive to the human ear. A total of nine laboratory scaled spoilers were looked at, seven of which had a fractal design, one with a regular grid design and one solid for reference. The spoilers were inclined at an angle of 30◦. Force, acoustic and flow visualisation experiments on a flat plate were carried out and it was found that the present fractal spoilers reduce the low frequency noise by 2.5dB. Results show that it is possible to improve the acoustic performance by modifying a number of parameters defining the fractal spoiler, some of them very sensitively. From these experiments, two fractal spoilers were chosen for a detailed aero-acoustic study on a three-element wing system, where it was found that the fractal spoilers had a reduction of up to 4dB in the sound pressure level while maintaining similar aerodynamic performances as conventional solid spoilers on the measured wing system.
  • 737 NG TQ Pro / Motor

    737 NG TQ Pro / Motor

    Version 1.2.9 FSC 737 TQ Pro Manual date: 2017-12-24 WELCOME TO 737 NG TQ Pro / Motor Version 1.2.9 – December 2017 INDEX 1 INTRODUCTION 2 2 INSTALLATION 3 3 USING THE TQ IN X-PLANE 5 4 USING THE TQ IN FS9, FSX, ESP AND Prepar3D 6 5 CONFIGURING TQ THROTTLE FOR FIRST TIME USE 7 6 USING TQ THROTTLE DEVICE 9 7 INSTALLING AND CONFIGURING THE TQ IN PROJECT MAGENTA 18 20 8 INSTALLING AND CONFIGURING THE TQ IN PROSIM 737 9 COMPATIBILITY NOTES 22 10 HOW TO CONFIGURE TQ CONNECTION WITH LAN INTERFACE 23 11 USING THE TQ IN X-PLANE 11 24 12 USING THE TQ WITH PMDG 777 X AND 747 QUEEN OF THE SKY II 25 13 HOW TO CONTACT SUPPORT 26 ! IMPORTANT ! Most of the functionalities of this product require registered FSUIPC if using MSFS related software and XPUIPC if using X-Plane. These products are not supplied with this driver and can be obtained from simmarket.com (FSUIPC) or from tosi-online.de (XPUIPC). The name of TQ program executable begins always with "MS173486 TQ" and may vary depending the release. If you are using the TQ in Project Magenta or Prosim 737 software, do not run the 737 NG TQ Pro Motor program (MS173486 TQ xxx.exe) since the TQ hardware can’t be used by two software running at the same time. Official website for information and support: http://www.flightsimulatorcenter.com Revision History : 1.2.9 : added configuration for PMDG 777 and 747 1.2.8 : added configuration for X-plane 11 737-800 1.2.7 : added configuration for LAN interface 1.2.6 : added configuration for Prosim737 1.2.5 : added configuration for Project Magenta www.flightsimulatorcenter.com page 1/26 Version 1.2.9 FSC 737 TQ Pro Manual date: 2017-12-24 1 - INTRODUCTION Welcome to 737 NG TQ Pro Metal.
  • Analysis and Simulation on Two Types of Thrust Reversers in an Aircraft Engine

    Analysis and Simulation on Two Types of Thrust Reversers in an Aircraft Engine

    MATEC Web of Conferences 119, 01012 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/ matecconf/201711901012 IMETI 2016 Analysis and simulation on two types of thrust reversers in an aircraft engine Feng Tian, Jingwu He, Yuexi Xiong and Yanxiong Zhaoa School of Aeronautical Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing, China Abstract. With rapid development of new composite material and manufacturing , innovative engineering solutions are supplied to the advanced nacelle, such as integrated propulsion system(IPS) , carbon-fiber composite inner skin by single-piece molding processwhich offers a reduction in fuel burn and less noise produced by engines. The advanced nacelle has an O-duct thrust reverser demonstrator whose composite structure is in the form of an “O” as opposed to the traditional “D-duct”. A comparative study is to be conducted to investigate the differences between the latest O-duct and conventional D-duct in numerical approaches. To focus on the quantitative analysis of thrust reverser’s operation, this paper mainly uses CATIA/Digital Mock Up(DMU) to simulate under deployment and stowed conditions of two different thrust reverser. After comparing the structural weight, the design models of blocker door are built for kinematic analysis of relevant mechanism and simulation. The results show that simplified design and elimination of multiple interfaces generates weight saving, O-duct improves airflows within the engine, meanwhile D-duct has excellent cost effective and maintainability. 1 Introduction 1.1 Thrust reverser Modern large passenger aircraft have great promotion on both the maximum takeoff gross weight and takeoff speed, more runway length are required to takeoff and landing.
  • Dash8-200/300 - Flight Controls

    Dash8-200/300 - Flight Controls

    Dash8-200/300 - Flight Controls FLIGHT CONTROLS CONTROLS AND INDICATORS Rudder and yaw damper Page 1 Dash8-200/300 - Flight Controls Elevators Page 2 Dash8-200/300 - Flight Controls Spoiler and aileron Page 3 Dash8-200/300 - Flight Controls Flaps Page 4 Dash8-200/300 - Flight Controls Flaps Page 5 Dash8-200/300 - Flight Controls Miscellaneous controls Page 6 Dash8-200/300 - Flight Controls Powered flight control surface controls and indications Page 7 Dash8-200/300 - Flight Controls Powered flight control switches and indications Page 8 Dash8-200/300 - Flight Controls 1SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION General The primary flight controls consist of ailerons and spoilers for roll control, elevator for pitch control and a two sectioned (fore and trailing) rudder for yaw control. Roll spoilers and fore rudder are hydraulically powered. Secondary flight controls, consists of wing flaps and trimming systems for the primary flight controls, and a flight control gust lock mechanism. All flight controls may be operated from either the left or right pilots’ position. Indications for flight control positions or malfunctions are provided by trim position indicators, the powered flight control surface indicator and a series of caution lights. Flight control surfaces location Page 9 Dash8-200/300 - Flight Controls Yaw control Directional control about the yaw axis is provided by the rudder control system. The rudder is hydraulically powered and controlled through displacement of either pilot’s rudder pedals. A yaw damper operates through the rudder control system to improve directional stability. Rudder control system The rudder has two sections (fore and trailing) driven by dual hydraulic actuators positioned by either pilot’s rudder pedals.