DOCSLIB.ORG

Figure 7. -- Key to Climax Series, Habitat Types, and Phases

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Figure 7. -- Key to Climax Series, Habitat Types, and Phases Figure 7. -- Key to climax series, habitat types, and phases. READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS FIRST! 1. Use this key for stands wi th a mature tree canopy phase description that fits the stand is the correct that are not severely disturbed by grazing, logging, one. ) forest fire, etc. (If the stand is severely disturbed or in an early successional stage, the habitat type 6. Use the definitions diagramed below for canopy cover­ can best be determined by extrapolating from the near­ age terms in the key. I f you have difficulty decid­ est mature Stand occupying a simi lar site.) ing between types, refer to constancy and coverage data (appendix c-1) and the habi tat type descriptions. 2. Accurate ly identi fy and record canopy coverages for all indicator species (appendix F). 7. In stands where undergrowth is obviously depauperate (unusually sparse) because of dense shading or duff 3. Check plot data in the field to accumulations, adjust the above definitions to the verify that the plot is representa­ next lower coverage class (e.g., well represented >1%, tive of the stand as a whole. If common >0%). not, take another plot. 8. Remember, the key is NOT the classification! Validate 4. Identify the correct potential the determination made using the key by checking the climax tree species in the SERIES written description. key. (Generally, a tree species is considered reproducing suc­ cessfully if 10 or more individ­ uals per acre occupy or will occupy the si te.) 5. Wi thin the appropriate series, key to HABITAT TYPE by following the key literally. Determine PHASE by matching the stand con­ di tions with the phase descrip­ tions for the type. (The first KEY TO CLIMAX SERIES (DO NOT PROCEED UNTIL YOU HAVE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS!) 1. Habitats on steep slopes (300)composed primarily of unstable fine rock; undergrowth sparse, poorly developed and quite variable. SCREE (p. 121) 1. Habitats on sites with some soil development and stability; undergrowth rather well developed and somewhat uniform ... 2. Tsuga heterophylla present and reproducing successfully TSUGA HETEROPHYLLA SERIES (item G) 2. Tsuga heterophylla not the indicated climax .. 3 3. Thuja plicata present and reproducing successfully .... THUJA PLICATA SERIES (item F) 3. Thuja plicata not the indicated climax .......... 4 4. Abies grandis present and reproducing more successfully than Abies TiiSl:OCarpa. ABIES GRANDIS SERIES (item E) 4. Abies grandis not the indicated climax ........... 5 5. Abies lasiocarpa, Tsuga mertensiana, or Larix lyallii present and reproducing successfully, or Pinus al bicaul is the dominant tree ABIES LASIOCARPA SERIES (item I) 5. Not as above .........-. -.- ...... 6 6. Picea present and reproducing successfully. PICEA SERIES (item D) 6. Picea not the indicated climax ........ 7 7. Pinus flexilis a successfully reproducing dominant; often sharing that status with Pseudotsuga . .. ..... PINUS FLEXILIS SERIES (item A) 7. Pinus flexilis absent or clearly seral. 8 8. Pseudotsuga menziesii present and reproducing successfully. PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII SERIES (item C) 8. Pseudotsuga menziesii not the indicated climax ...... 9 9. Pure Pinus contort a stands, with 1 itt Ie evidence as to potential climax.-:-.-.-.-.- .................... PINUS CONTORTA SERIES (item H) 9. Pinus contort a absent; Pinus ponderosa the indicated cl imax . PINUS PONDEROSA SERIES (item B) A. Key to Pinus flexilis Habitat Types 1. Festuca idahoensis well represented or F. scabrella common. PINUS FLEXILIS/FESTUCA IDAHOENSIS h.t. (p. 25) --- a. Festuca scabrella common.-. -.-.-.-.-... FESTUCA SCABRELLA phase b. F. scabrella scarce ........... FESTUCA IDAHOENSIS phase 1. F. idahoens is poorly represented and.!:.. scabrella scarce. 2 2. Agropyron spicatum well represented . PINUS. FLEXILIS/ AGROPYRON SPICATUM h. t. (p. 24) 2. 12. spicatum poorly represented; Juniperus communis (or ;!. horizontalis) well represented . -.-.-. -.-. .PINUS FLEXILIS/JUNIPERUS COMMUNIS h.t. (p. 26) PUBLISHED AS PART OF "FOREST HABITAT TYPES OF r-DNTANA" - INT 1977 B. Key to Pinus ponderosa !labi tat Types ]. Prunus virginiana well represented; only in southeastern Montana PINUS PONDEROSA/PRUNUS YIRGINIANA h.t. (p. 34) a. Shepherdia canadensis well represented SHEPHERDIA CANADENSIS phase b. Shepherdia poorly represented PRlfNUS YIRGINIANA phase ]. f.. virginiana poorly represented ..... 2. Symphoricarpos al bus we 11 represented PINUS PONDEROSA/SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUS h. t. (p. 33) a. Berberis repens common BERBERIS REPENS phase b. Berberis scarce . " .. SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUS phase 2. ~. albus poorly represented . 3. ·Purshia tridentata well represented . .. .. ......... PINUS PONDEROSA/PURSHIA TRIDENTATA h. t. (p. 32) a. Festuca idahoensis well represented or F. scabrella common FESTUCA IDAHOENSIS phase b. I. idahoensis poorly represented and F. -scabrella scarce AGROPYRON SPICATU~l phase 3. Purshia poorly represented ............ -:- .-.-.-. -.-. 4. Festuca idahoensis well represented or F. scabrella common PINUS PONDEROSA/FESTUCA IDAHOENSIS h.t.(p. 31) a. Festuca scabrella common .. -:- .-.-.-. -.- .. FESTUCA SCABRELLA phase b. F. scabrella scarce ............. FESTUCA IDAHOENSIS phase 4. I. idahoensis poorly represented and £.. scabrella scarce . 5. !-gropyron spicatum well represented . PINUS PONDEROSA/AGROPYRON SPICATUM h.t. (p. 30) 5. ~. spicatum poorly represented; Andropogon spp. well represented PINUS PONDEROSA/ ANDROPOGON h. t. (p. 30) C. Key to Pseudotsuga menziesi i Habi tat Types 1. Yaccinium caespi tosum present .... PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII/YACCINIUM CAESPITOSUM h.t.(p. 39) 1 . .'::.. caespi tosum absent . 2 2. Physocarpus malvaceus or lIolodiscus discolor well represented PSEUOOTSUGA MENZIESII/PHYSOCARPUS MALYACEUS h. t. (p. 41) a. Calamagrostis rubescens and/or Carex geyeri are the dominant undergrowth . CALAMAGROSTIS RUBESCENS phase b. Physocarpus and/or Holodiscus dominate the undergrowth. PHYSOCARPUS MALVACEUS phase 2. Physocarpus and Holodiscus poorly represented 3. Linnaea borealis common ............ PSEUOOTSUGA MENZIESII/LINNAEA BOREALIS h. t. (p. 44) --- a.symphoricarpos albus well represented SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUS phase b. Yaccinium globulare well represented YACCINIUM GLOBULARE phase c. Not as above . CALA}1AGROSTIS RUBESCENS phase 3. Linnaea scarce . 4. Yaccinium globulare or XerophYllum ~ well represented PSEUOOTSUGA MENZIESII/VACCINIUM GLOBULARE h.t.(p. 43) a. Arctostaphylos uva-ursi and Pinus pcnderosa common ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UYA-URSI phase b. Xerophyllum common ............... XEROPHYLLUM TEN AX phase c. Not as above . YACCINIUM GLOBULARE phase 4. Yaccinium globulare and Xerophyllum tenax poorly represented 5. Symphoricarpos albus well represented ............ PSEUOOTSUGA MENZIESII/SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUS h.t.(p. 45) a. Bunchgrasses well represented in old-growth stands AGROPYRON SPICATUM phase b. Calamagrostis rubescens well represented CALAMA(;ROSTIS RUBESCENS phase c. Not as above . SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUS phase 5. ~. albus poorly represented ............. 6. Calamagrostis rubescens well represented ..... PSEUOOTSUGA MENZIESII/CALAMAGROSTIS RUBESCENS h.t. (p. 47) a. Bunchgrasses well represented in old-growth stands AGROPYRON SPICATUM phase b. Arctostaphylos uva-ursi common; sites capable of supporting Pinus ponderosa and not too dry for Pinus contorta (or Larix occidentalis) ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UYA-URSI phase c. Pinus ponderosa common PINUS PONDEROSA phase d. Not as above . CALAMAGROSTIS RUBESCENS phase 6. C. rubescens poorly represented 7. Carex geyeri we 11 represented . PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII/CAREX GEYERI h.t.(p. 51) 7. f. geyeri poorly represented . 8 8. Arctostaphylos uva-ursi welJ represented and Pinus ponderosa present . PSEUOOTSUGA MENZIESII/ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UYA-URSI h. t. (p. 52) 8. Arctostaphylos poorly represented or stands above elevational limi ts of Pinus ponderosa . 9. Juniperus communis (or {. horizontal is) dominates the undergrowth PSEUOOTSUGA MENZIESII/JUNIPERUS COMMUNIS h.t. (p. 53) 9. :!.. communis not the dominant undergrowth plant 10 10. Spiraea betulifolia well represented .... PSEUOOTSUGA MENZIESII/SPIRAEA BETULIFOLIA h.t. (p. 52) 10. ~. betulifolia poorly represented ..... 11 11. Arnica cordifolia or Antennaria racemosa the dominant undergrowth PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII/ARNICA CORDIFOLIA h.t. (p. 54) 11. ~difolia and ~. ~ not the dominant undergrowth 12 12. Festuca scabre lla common . PSEUOOTSUGA MENZIESII/FESTUCA SCABRELLA h. t. (p. 38) 12. £.. scabrella scarce .................... 13 13. Symphoricarpos oreophilus well represented and Festuca idahoensis scarce . PSEUOOTSUGA MENZIESII/SYMPHORICARPOS OREOPHILUS h.t.(p. 55) 13. Not as aoove .....................• 14 14. Festuca idahoensis common; Pinus ponderosa scarce .• PSEUOOTSUGA MENZIESII/FESTUCA IDAHOENSIS h. t. (p. 38) 14. ~O~llY scarce; Agropyron spicatum well represented; Pinus ponderosa usually common . PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII/AGROPYRON SPICATUM h.t.(p. 37) D. Key to Picea Babi tat Types 1. Equiseturn spp. abundant ... PICEA/EQUISETU~1 ARVENSE h. t. (p. 58) Equiseturn spp. not abundant . 2 2. Clintonia uniflora, Comus canadensis, or Aralia nudicaulis present (si tes in northwestern Montana). PICEA/CLINTONIA UNIFLORA h. t. (p. 59) a. Vaccinium caespi tosum present . VACCINIU~1 CAESPITOSUM phase b. Y... caespi tosurn absent . CLINTONIA UNI FLORA phase 2. Not as above . 3 3. Physocarpus malvaceus well represented PICEA/PHYSOCARPUS ~1ALVACEUS h.t. (p. 61) 3. Physocarpus poorly represented . 4 4. Two of these moist-site forbs present: Galiurn triflorum, Streptopus amplexifolius, Actaea rubra -.-- ---- PICEA/GALIUM TRIFLORUM h. t.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Checklist of Common Native Plants the Diversity of Acadia National Park Is Refl Ected in Its Plant Life; More Than 1,100 Plant Species Are Found Here
    National Park Service Acadia U.S. Department of the Interior Acadia National Park Checklist of Common Native Plants The diversity of Acadia National Park is refl ected in its plant life; more than 1,100 plant species are found here. This checklist groups the park’s most common plants into the communities where they are typically found. The plant’s growth form is indicated by “t” for trees and “s” for shrubs. To identify unfamiliar plants, consult a fi eld guide or visit the Wild Gardens of Acadia at Sieur de Monts Spring, where more than 400 plants are labeled and displayed in their habitats. All plants within Acadia National Park are protected. Please help protect the park’s fragile beauty by leaving plants in the condition that you fi nd them. Deciduous Woods ash, white t Fraxinus americana maple, mountain t Acer spicatum aspen, big-toothed t Populus grandidentata maple, red t Acer rubrum aspen, trembling t Populus tremuloides maple, striped t Acer pensylvanicum aster, large-leaved Aster macrophyllus maple, sugar t Acer saccharum beech, American t Fagus grandifolia mayfl ower, Canada Maianthemum canadense birch, paper t Betula papyrifera oak, red t Quercus rubra birch, yellow t Betula alleghaniesis pine, white t Pinus strobus blueberry, low sweet s Vaccinium angustifolium pyrola, round-leaved Pyrola americana bunchberry Cornus canadensis sarsaparilla, wild Aralia nudicaulis bush-honeysuckle s Diervilla lonicera saxifrage, early Saxifraga virginiensis cherry, pin t Prunus pensylvanica shadbush or serviceberry s,t Amelanchier spp. cherry, choke t Prunus virginiana Solomon’s seal, false Maianthemum racemosum elder, red-berried or s Sambucus racemosa ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Viewing
    Wildlife Viewing Common Yukon roadside flowers © Government of Yukon 2019 ISBN 987-1-55362-830-9 A guide to common Yukon roadside flowers All photos are Yukon government unless otherwise noted. Bog Laurel Cover artwork of Arctic Lupine by Lee Mennell. Yukon is home to more than 1,250 species of flowering For more information contact: plants. Many of these plants Government of Yukon are perennial (continuously Wildlife Viewing Program living for more than two Box 2703 (V-5R) years). This guide highlights Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2C6 the flowers you are most likely to see while travelling Phone: 867-667-8291 Toll free: 1-800-661-0408 x 8291 by road through the territory. Email: [email protected] It describes 58 species of Yukon.ca flowering plant, grouped by Table of contents Find us on Facebook at “Yukon Wildlife Viewing” flower colour followed by a section on Yukon trees. Introduction ..........................2 To identify a flower, flip to the Pink flowers ..........................6 appropriate colour section White flowers .................... 10 and match your flower with Yellow flowers ................... 19 the pictures. Although it is Purple/blue flowers.......... 24 Additional resources often thought that Canada’s Green flowers .................... 31 While this guide is an excellent place to start when identi- north is a barren landscape, fying a Yukon wildflower, we do not recommend relying you’ll soon see that it is Trees..................................... 32 solely on it, particularly with reference to using plants actually home to an amazing as food or medicines. The following are some additional diversity of unique flora. resources available in Yukon libraries and bookstores.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computerized Annotated Bibliography of Partial-Cutting Methods in the Pacific Northwest (1995 Update)
    FRDA FORESTRY HANDBOOK 010 PARTCUTS: A Computerized Annotated Bibliography of Partial-cutting Methods in the Pacific Northwest (1995 Update) ISSN 0835 1929 MARCH 1995 CANADA-BRITISH COLUMBIA PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT ON FOREST RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT: FRDA II PARTCUTS: A Computerized Annotated Bibliography of Partial-cutting Methods in the Pacific Northwest (1995 Update) by Patrick W. Daigle Compiler and Editor Research Branch BC Ministry of Forests 31 Bastion Square Victoria, B.C. V8W 3E7 March 1995 CANADA-BRITISH COLUMBIA PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT ON FOREST RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT: FRDA II Funding for this publication was provided by the Canada-British Columbia Partnership Agreement on Forest Resource Development: FRDA II - a four year (1991-95) $200 million program cost-shared equally by the federal and provincial governments. Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Daigle, Patrick W. PARTCUTS: a computerized annotated bibliography of partial-cutting methods in the Pacific Northwest (1995 Update) (FRDA handbook, ISSN 0835-1929 ; 010) "Canada-British Columbia Partnership Agreement on Forest Resource Development: FRDA II." Co-published by BC Ministry of Forests. Includes bibliographical references: p. ISBN 0-7726-1658-2 1. Information storage and retrieval systems- Forestry - Handbooks, manuals, etc. 2. Forests and forestry - research - Northwest, Pacific - Data processing - Handbooks, manuals, etc. 3. Forests and forestry - Northwest, Pacific - Bibliography. 4. Forest management - Northwest, Pacific - Bibliography. I. Comeau, P.G., 1954 - .II. Canada. Forestry Canada. III. Canada-British Columbia Partnership Agreement on Forest Resource Development: FRDA II. IV. British Columbia Ministry of Forests. V. Title. VI. Series. SD381.5.D34 1992 025.06'634953 C92-092374-7 1995 Government of Canada, Province of British Columbia This is a joint publication of Forestry Canada and the British Columbia Ministry of Forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Twinflower (Linnaea Borealis L.) – Plant Species of Potential Medicinal Properties
    From Botanical to Medical Research Vol. 63 No. 3 2017 DOI: 10.1515/hepo-2017-0019 REVIEW PAPER Twinflower (Linnaea borealis L.) – plant species of potential medicinal properties BARBARA THIEM1* ELISABETH BUK-BERGE2 1Department of Pharmaceutical Botany and Plant Biotechnology Poznań University of Medical Sciences Św. Marii Magdaleny 14 61-861 Poznań, Poland 2The Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research** Postbox 8119 Dep. 0032 Oslo, Norway *corresponding author: phone: +4861 6687851, e-mail: [email protected] Summary Twinflower (Linnaea borealis L.) is a widespread circumboreal plant species belonging to Linnaeaceae family (previously Caprifoliaceae). L. borealis commonly grows in taiga and tundra. In some countries in Europe, including Poland, twinflower is protected as a glacial relict. Chemical composition of this species is not well known, however in folk medicine of Scandinavian countries, L. borealis has a long tradition as a cure for skin diseases and rheumatism. It is suggested that twinflower has potential medicinal properties. The new study on lead secondary metabolites responsible for biological activity are necessary. This short review summarizes very sparse knowledge on twinflower: its biology, distribution, conservation status, chemical constituents, and describes the role of this plant in folk tradition of Scandinavian countries. Key words: Linnaea borealis, botanical description, distribution, secondary metabolites, folk medicine INTRODUCTION of the Linnaea genus was provided by Christen- husz in 2013 [3]. The genusLinnaea was reviewed Linnaea borealis L. (eng. twinflower; pol. zimoziół and expanded to include the genera: Abelia, Di- północny, Linnea północna; nor. Nårislegras, Flis- pelta, Diabelia, Kolkwitzia and Vesalea. In gen- megras) belongs to Linnaeaceae family, formerly eral, in the new depiction this taxon consist of 16 to Caprifoliaceae [1, 2].
    [Show full text]
  • 2009) Summary Report: Tanacross Shaded Fuelbreak AA39, 9/29/09
    2009 SUMMARY REPORT R.R. Jandt 9/29/09 Tanacross Shaded Fuel Break AA39 Fuel Reduction Project Local residents, working with the village council and Alaska Fire Service, received federal funding to reduce the fire risk and hazard to private residential structures by modifying fuel structure and continuity of 66 acres around the community of Tanacross. Treatment was intended to produce a more open stand to slow the rate of spread and intensity of an accidental fire. At the same time, residents wanted to minimize the visual and ecological impact of the shaded fuel break by using hand Figure 1. Hand crew thinning spruce stand and removing crews to treat the area instead of ladder fuels around Tanacross. heavy equipment (Fig. 1). Vegetation Cover Three permanent transects, measuring 30m x 3m, were established in 2001 to monitor changes in understory vegetation cover. Though vegetation composition differed slightly between transects, pre-treatment (2001) understory cover was dominated by heath shrub, such as low-bush cranberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea) and live feather moss with some tall willows (Salix bebbiana, primarily). Other common species pre-treatment included crowberry (Empetrum nigrum), twinflower (Linnaea borealis), and bastard toadflax (Geocaulon lividum). White spruce (Picea glauca) was the dominant overstory tree. Transects were monitored from 2002-2004 and in 2009 to assess changes in cover type. The most notable change was loss of viability of the feather moss cover on the forest floor in the first two summers following the treatment (Fig. 2, 3). Live moss was almost 50% of the substrate (ground cover) in 2001, whereas by 2003 less than 5% was recorded as live and 22% of the substrate cover was dead feather moss.
    [Show full text]
  • Algific Talus (Cts46)
    Species Frequently Found in Native Plant Communities Southern Algific Talus (CTs46) Types in Class: Algific Talus (CTs46a) Limestone Subtype (CTs46a1) Dolomite Subtype (CTs46a2) Scientific Name Column1 Common Name Rare Status Abies balsamea Balsam fir Acer saccharum Sugar maple Acer spicatum Mountain maple Adoxa moschatellina Moschatel Special Concern Allium cernuum Nodding wild onion Threatened Arabis hirsuta Hairy rock cress Betula alleghaniensis Yellow birch Chrysosplenium iowense Iowa golden saxifrage Endangered Cryptogramma stelleri Slender cliff brake Cystopteris bulbifera Bulblet fern Dicentra cucullaria Dutchman's breeches Enemion biternatum False rue anemone Gymnocarpium robertianum Northern oak fern Impatiens spp. touch-me-not Impatiens capensis Spotted touch-me-not Impatiens pallida Pale touch-me-not Laportea canadensis Wood nettle Linnaea borealis var. longiflora Twinflower Mertensia paniculata Panicled bluebells Mitella nuda Naked miterwort Pinus strobus White pine Rhamnus alnifolia Dwarf alder Ribes hudsonianum Northern black currant Rubus idaeus var. strigosus Red raspberry Sambucus racemosa Red-berried elder Saxifraga pensylvanica Swamp saxifrage Taxus canadensis Canada yew Urtica dioica ssp. gracilis Stinging nettle Viburnum trilobum Highbush cranberry Source: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (2005). Field Guide to the Native Plant Communities of Minnesota: The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province. Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. MNDNR St. Paul, MN. Limestone Subtype (CTs46a1) Scientific Name Column1 Common Name Rare Status No information available Dolomite Subtype (CTs46a2) Scientific Name Column1 Common Name Rare Status No information available Source: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (2005). Field Guide to the Native Plant Communities of Minnesota: The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province. Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Plant Diversity in New England
    CONSERVING PLANT DIVERSITY IN NEW ENGLAND A COLLABORATION OF CONSERVING PLANT DIVERSITY IN NEW ENGLAND A COLLABORATION OF AUTHORS Mark Anderson Director of Conservation Science, Eastern United States, The Nature Conservancy Michael Piantedosi Director of Conservation, Native Plant Trust William Brumback Director of Conservation Emeritus, Native Plant Trust MAP PRODUCTION Arlene Olivero WEB TOOL Melissa Clark DESIGN Rachel Wolff-Lander Kate Wollensak Freeborn The authors wish to thank the six state Natural Heritage programs for sharing their data and for their support. ©2021 Published June 2021 © Peter James CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 PART ONE: CONSERVING PLANT DIVERSITY 1-1 Background 1-2 • Plant Diversity and Resilience 1-2 • Global Strategy for Plant Conservation and Global Deal for Nature 1-7 • Secured Lands and GAP Status 1-9 • New England Flora and Rare Taxa 1-11 • Threats to Plant Diversity in New England 1-14 • Conservation Actions to Counter Threats to Plant Diversity 1-17 Conservation of Habitats and Important Plant Areas 1-21 Introduction 1-21 • Terminology 1-21 • Overview and Methods 1-22 Conservation of Habitats: Progress Toward Global and Regional Goals 1-26 • Matrix Forests 1-26 • Wetlands 1-30 • Patch-forming Habitats 1-33 • Risk of Conversion 1-36 Conservation of Important Plant Areas (IPAs) 1-37 • Definition and Location of IPAs 1-37 • Conservation Status and Progress Toward Goals 1-40 • Representation of Habitats in the IPAs 1-42 Conservation of Threatened Species 1-48 • Threatened Plants Conserved in situ 1-48 • Threatened Plants Conserved in ex situ Collections 1-49 Results and Recommendations 1-58 i CONTENTS continued PART TWO: STATUS REPORT AND MAPS 2-1 Overview 2-4 New England’s Terrestrial Habitats 2-7 Map Page Layout 2-13 Upland Habitats: Matrix Forest 2-16 Upland Habitats: Patch-forming Habitats 2-53 Wetland Habitats 2-80 PART THREE: SUPPORTING MATERIAL 3-1 Bibliography 3-2 Appendices 3-11 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of the Coastal Dunes of Humboldt County, California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 4-2019 Vascular Plants of the Coastal Dunes of Humboldt County, California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Vascular Plants of the Coastal Dunes of Humboldt County, California" (2019). Botanical Studies. 41. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/41 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE COASTAL DUNES OF HUMBOLDT COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Compiled by James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California Ninth Edition • August 2019 Amaryllidaceae — Onion or Amaryllis Family F E R N S Allium unifolium •One-leaved onion Dennstaedtiaceae — Bracken Fern Family Anacardiaceae — Cashew Family Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens • Bracken fern Toxicodendron diversilobum • Poison-oak Ophioglossaceae — Adder’s-tongue Family Apocynaceae — Dogbane or Milkweed Family Botrychium multifidum • Leathery
    [Show full text]
  • Native Herbaceous Plants in Our Gardens
    Native Herbaceous Plants in Our Gardens A Guide for the Willamette Valley Native Gardening Awareness Program A Committee of the Emerald Chapter of the Native Plant Society of Oregon Members of the Native Gardening Awareness Program, a committee of the Emerald chapter of the NPSO, contributed text, editing, and photographs for this publication. They include: Mieko Aoki, John Coggins, Phyllis Fisher, Rachel Foster, Evelyn Hess, Heiko Koester, Cynthia Lafferty, Danna Lytjen, Bruce Newhouse, Nick Otting, and Michael Robert Spring 2005 1 2 Table of Contents Native Herbaceous Plants in Our Gardens ...........................5 Shady Woodlands .................................................................7 Baneberry – Actaea rubra ................................................... 7 Broad-leaved Bluebells – Mertensia platyphylla .....................7 Hound’s-tongue – Cynoglossum grande ............................... 8 Broad-leaved Starflower –Trientalis latifolia ..........................8 Bunchberry – Cornus unalaschkensis (formerly C. canadensis) ....8 False Solomon’s-seal – Maianthemum racemosum ................ 9 Fawn Lily – Erythronium oregonum .........................................9 Ferns ..........................................................................10-12 Fringecup – Tellima grandiflora and T. odorata ..................... 12 Inside-out Flower – Vancouveria hexandra ....................... 13 Large-leaved Avens – Geum macrophyllum ...................... 13 Meadowrue – Thalictrum spp. ...............................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Response of Cypripedium and Goodyera to Disturbance in the Thunder Bay Area
    Lakehead University Knowledge Commons,http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca Electronic Theses and Dissertations Undergraduate theses 2018 Response of Cypripedium and Goodyera to disturbance in the Thunder Bay area Davis, Danielle http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/4426 Downloaded from Lakehead University, KnowledgeCommons 5(63216(2)&<35,3(',80$1'*22'<(5$72',6785%$1&(,1 7+(7+81'(5%$<$5($ E\ 'DQLHOOH'DYLV )$&8/7<2)1$785$/5(6285&(60$1$*(0(17 /$.(+($'81,9(56,7< 7+81'(5%$<217$5,2 0D\ RESPONSE OF CYPRIPEDIUM AND GOODYERA TO DISTURBANCE IN THE THUNDER BAY AREA by Danielle Davis An Undergraduate Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Honours Bachelor of Environmental Management Faculty of Natural Resources Management Lakehead University May 2018 Major Advisor Second Reader ii LIBRARY RIGHTS STATEMENT In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the HBEM degree at Lakehead University in Thunder Bay, I agree that the University will make it freely available for inspection. This thesis is made available by my authority solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part (except as permitted by the Copyright Laws) without my written authority. Signature: Date: iii A CAUTION TO THE READER This HBEM thesis has been through a semi-formal process of review and comment by at least two faculty members. It is made available for loan by the Faculty of Natural Resources Management for the purpose of advancing the practice of professional and scientific forestry.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report
    U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park, Maine Project Report Revised Edition – October 2003 Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U. S. Department of the Interior, U. S. Geological Survey. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park, Maine Sara Lubinski and Kevin Hop U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center and Susan Gawler Maine Natural Areas Program This report produced by U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center 2630 Fanta Reed Road La Crosse, Wisconsin 54603 and Maine Natural Areas Program Department of Conservation 159 Hospital Street 93 State House Station Augusta, Maine 04333-0093 In conjunction with Mike Story (NPS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) NPS, Natural Resources Information Division, Inventory and Monitoring Program Karl Brown (USGS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) USGS, Center for Biological Informatics and Revised Edition - October 2003 USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park Contacts U.S. Department of Interior United States Geological Survey - Biological Resources Division Website: http://www.usgs.gov U.S. Geological Survey Center for Biological Informatics P.O. Box 25046 Building 810, Room 8000, MS-302 Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225-0046 Website: http://biology.usgs.gov/cbi Karl Brown USGS Program Coordinator - USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Phone: (303) 202-4240 E-mail: [email protected] Susan Stitt USGS Remote Sensing and Geospatial Technologies Specialist USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Phone: (303) 202-4234 E-mail: [email protected] Kevin Hop Principal Investigator U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Site F043AY529WA Warm-Frigid, Dry-Udic, Loamy Foothills/Mountainsides, Ashy Surface (Grand Fir Moist Herb) Abies Grandis/Clintonia Uniflora
    Natural Resources Conservation Service Ecological site F043AY529WA Warm-Frigid, Dry-Udic, Loamy Foothills/Mountainsides, ashy surface (Grand Fir Moist Herb) Abies grandis/Clintonia uniflora Last updated: 10/14/2020 Accessed: 10/01/2021 General information MLRA notes Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 043A–Northern Rocky Mountains Major land resource area (MLRA): 043A-Northern Rocky Mountains Description of MLRAs can be found in: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. Available electronically at: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ref/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624#handbook LRU notes Most commonly found in LRU 43A04 (Selkirk Mountains). Also found in adjacent areas of 43A03, 44A01 and 44A02. Climate parameters were obtained from PRISM and other models for the area. Landscape descriptors are derived from USGS DEM products and their derivatives. Classification relationships Relationship to Other Established Classifications: United States National Vegetation Classification (2008), Grand Fir – Douglas-fir Central Rocky Mountain Forest & Woodland Alliance. Washington Natural Heritage Program. Ecosystems of Washington State, A Guide to Identification, Rocchio and Crawford, 2015 - Northern Rocky Mt. Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest (Cedar-Hemlock) Description of Ecoregions of the United States, USFS PN # 1391, 1995 - M333 Northern Rocky Mt. Forest-Steppe- Coniferous Forest-Alpine Meadow Province Level III and IV Ecoregions of WA, US EPA, June 2010 – 15y Selkirk Mountains, 15w Western Selkirk Maritime Forest. This ecological site includes the following USDA Forest Service Plant Associations Grand Fir Series: ABGR/CLUN.
    [Show full text]