The Opening Bid

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Opening Bid The Opening Bid The essence of good Bridge is that a partnership should make the majority of contracts that they bid and not find themselves being too heavily penalised for the contracts that they cannot make – either because they have decided to sacrifice or because they are in a contract that fails due to unlucky breaks or very good defence. In short, the partnership must be in the right contract, whether that contract is a part-score, a game or a slam. Arriving at the right contract is not always easy and therefore the partners need to understand, with a good deal of precision, exactly what they are saying to each other. Such an understanding takes time and experience to develop, of course, but there are a number of basic principles involved that will make the process considerably easier. These are:- 1). Bid your longest suit first or, when you have two suits of equal length, bid the higher ranking first (except when you have two 4- card suits of s and another, when you should open the lower- ranking suit). 2). If your hand is ‘balanced’ (i.e. holding either 4-3-3-3 or 4-4-3-2 or 5-3-3-2 shape) make a bid in no-trumps at the appropriate level at the first available opportunity, unless partner has already shown support for your long suit {see below:- ‘Opening Balanced Hands’}. 3). If your hand is ‘unbalanced’ (i.e. holding any other shape than the three outlined above) always decide before you bid what your next bid is going to be, assuming that partner will make a minimum response to your opening bid. 4). As a first priority, find the suit where you have a ‘fit’ with your partner (i.e. where your combined holding in a suit consists of at least 8 of the 13 cards). Finding a fit is much more important than jumping around to show a strong hand - if you do this you will find yourself playing in contracts with a totally unsuitable trump holding or (even worse) playing in a no-trump contract with two wildly unbalanced hands. Sometimes you will make these contracts – but far more often, you won’t. 5). Once you have found a fit, make a limit bid. 6). Once you have made a limit bid – either by bidding no-trumps or by making a limit raise in a previously bid suit - accept that the final decision about where the contract should be played is to be made by your partner. 7). Do not bid your partner’s hand for him – you cannot possibly evaluate it as well as he can, since you can’t see it. 8). Until your partner tells you otherwise, always assume that he has a minimum for his response(s). If you don’t make this assumption, you will be playing far too many contracts at too high a level. 9). Whenever possible, make the bid that communicates the clearest picture of your hand. Without the most accurate picture your partner cannot possibly be expected to evaluate the merits of the combined holding and you are therefore less likely to reach the best contract. 10). If you have no more than you have already promised after your partner makes a limit bid – PASS! These principles can be called the Ten Commandments. Like the original commandments it is remarkable how often they are broken, even by players who should know better. If you learn them and abide by them, you will rarely go badly wrong. The most difficult hands to bid are those where you and your partner do not have the confidence to trust each other’s bids. Without partnership understanding, you will finish in part-score contracts while others are bidding and making game, or in game where others are bidding lay-down slams. Alternatively you will bid too high, conceding hefty penalties to opponents who have done little or nothing to earn their good score. The only sure route to partnership understanding is by learning (amicably) from your joint mistakes. If a misunderstanding has occurred, discuss the causes carefully until a common understanding has been reached. If you do this, you should be able to avoid making the same errors again. Eventually you will run out of situations where bidding misunderstandings occur! Before moving on to the discussion of the requirements for making an opening bid, two further concepts need to be examined. Firstly, the concept of shape. Of the billions of possible hands that you could hold, there are only two types – either ‘balanced’ or ‘unbalanced’. The methods of bidding your hand varies according to the shape, so it is important to recognise which type of hand you hold before you start to bid. The second important concept is the idea of a limit bid. It is very important to comprehend that a limit bid makes a statement about both the shape and strength of your hand, in terms of a minimum and maximum number of high-card points (HCP). There is no bid more important in Bridge, no matter what system you play, since without a method of limiting the strength of your hand your partnership cannot control the point at which the auction should stop. Thus, any bid that is made during the auction can be defined as either a limit bid or an unlimited bid. The basic distinction between the two is that a limit bid is never forcing, whereas an unlimited bid may or may not be forcing, depending on the circumstances. It follows therefore that if you want your partner to bid again, you must not make a limit bid. However, refer back to the fifth commandment at this point - 'once you have found a fit, make a limit bid.’ Unless your hand is too strong to make a limit raise, it is a capital offence to break this commandment! Opening Balanced Hands To open a balanced hand there are only two requirements:- 1). At least 12 high-card points. 2). Either any 4-3-3-3 shape, any 4-4-3-2 shape or any 5-3-3-2 shape. Your aim with these hands is to make a bid in no-trumps at the first available opportunity, unless your partner makes a limit raise in your first-bid suit. The point and level at which you bid no-trumps specifies your high-card point count within a three point range. Thus, your bid in no-trumps is a limit bid, designating both the shape and strength of your hand. The method of bidding different strengths is as follows:- 1). 12-14 HCP - Open 1NT. 2). 15-16 HCP - Open with 1 of your longest suit and rebid 1NT over partner’s response (or rebid 2NT if partner has responded with a 2-level bid). 3). 17-18 HCP - Open with 1 of your longest suit and rebid 2NT over partner’s response (or rebid 3NT over a 2- level response). 4). 19 HCP - Open 1 of your longest suit and rebid 3NT whatever partner responds. 5). 20-22 HCP - Open 2NT. 6). 23+ HCP - Open 2. and rebid 2NT with 23-24 HCP and 3NT with 25+ HCP. These six possibilities cover all the ways of showing a balanced hand containing 12 or more high-card points. Note that the bids comprise a simple two-step code, telling your partner within a maximum three point range how many points you hold as well as the balanced shape. In theory it takes a combined holding of 25 HCP to bid a game and 33 HCP to bid a no-trump slam, whenever both you and your partner hold balanced hands. Once you have shown your hand partner should be able to estimate where the contract should be played, simply by adding the minimum number of points that you could hold to his own. Opening Unbalanced Hands The requirements for opening unbalanced hands are less stringent than those for balanced hands. The difference is that the more unbalanced your hand the fewer high-card points you need to open the bidding. Example 1 A 10 9 8 6 3 Q J 10 7 2 10 4 . - - - - It is definitely acceptable to open the bidding with 1 on this hand, since you have a safe rebid of 2 whatever your partner responds. The lack of high-card points is more than compensated for by the shape. The danger with this type of hand, of course, is that partner may well get over-excited by the opening bid if he holds a good hand – thus landing you in an impossible contract before you have had a chance to show the lack of high-card strength. In order to avoid this danger you need to develop an understanding with your partner of the type of hands that constitute an unbalanced opening bid and how the different types should be shown. To do this you need a set of rules that can be applied to all the possible auctions that you could encounter. This set of rules for bidding unbalanced hands, coupled with the rules for bidding balanced hands, comprises your basic system. Perhaps the best method of enumerating this set of rules is to describe all the possible hands you could open, from the weakest to the strongest, complete with the possible bids that you can make. As with the method for showing strength as well as shape in bidding balanced hands, the combination of your bids for bidding unbalanced hands is also a code. Provided both you and your partner have spent the time necessary to agree what particular bids mean, you should not have too much difficulty in expressing the nature of your hand – nor should you have much difficulty in understanding your partner’s bids.
Recommended publications
  • Bridge Bidding Systems for Finding Major Suit Fits Pete Matthews – December 27, 2010
    Bridge Bidding Systems for Finding Major Suit Fits Pete Matthews – December 27, 2010 This article outlines and compares bridge bidding systems for finding both 4-4 and 5-3 major suit fits, when the opening bid is one of a minor suit. Short club systems attempt to locate the fits at the one level. Fourth bid systems are the more usual approach – the search begins in earnest with responder's second bid. Finally, I conclude with comparisons of features and methods. A. Short Club Systems The systems in this part take advantage of the extra bidding space when 1♣ is opened. When playing them, it makes sense to require a four or five card suit to open 1♦, to increase the frequency and value of the 1♣ opening. Because these systems do not operate over other openings, 1♦ in particular, you will need other methods for those cases. 1. Montreal Relay The basic Montreal Relay system attempts to find both 4-4 and 5-3 major suit fits at the one level. The 1♥ or 1♠ opening promises a suit of at least 5 cards. The 1♦ opening guarantees four cards (some play five), so 1♣ becomes a catch-all opening bid. Over 1♣, a response of 1♥ or 1♠ promises five cards. A 1♦ response may be used with natural diamonds, but opener assumes this is a waiting bid with one or both 4-card majors. Opener must rebid a 4-card major (1♥ with both) over the 1♦ response. The full system includes invitational suit bids at the 2-level and forcing suit bids at the 3-level, all showing major suits.
    [Show full text]
  • 40Ppfinal (0708)
    Washington www.Washington BridgeLeague.org Bridge League Sept./Oct. 2002 B♣U♥L♠L♦E♥T♣I♠N Thursday, October 10 ♣Stratified Open Pairs ............................................................................ 10:30am Washington Bridge Center,,, 1620 Elton Road, Silver Spring MD ♦StrataFlighted Open Pairs (both sites) + Stratified 199er Pairs (Christ the King Church only) or Stratified 99er Pairs (Beth El only) Beth El Congregation, 3830 Seminary Rd, Alexandria .......................... 7:00pm Christ the King Church, 2301 Colston Drive, Silver Spring ................... 7:30pm Capital Beltway to Connecticut Ave. South. Left on East-West Hwy. Right on Grubb Rd. 1st left on Colston. The church is one block on the left. * * * * Remainder of Tournament held at White Oak Armory Only * * * * 12200 Cherry Hill Road, Silver Spring MD Capital Beltway East to US 29 North (Exit 30A- toward Columbia) or Capital Beltway West to MD 193 West (Exit 29 - toward Wheaton); go ½ mile and turn right on US 29 North. Go north 4 miles, then right on Cherry Hill Rd. Right on Robert L. Finn Dr. (immediately after Toyota dealer) and left into parking lot. Friday, October 11 ♥Stratified Open Pairs (single sessions).................. 10:00am, 2:00pm & 8:00pm ♠Stratified Senior Pairs (single sessions) .............................. 10:00am & 2:00pm ♣Intermediate/Novice Pairs (single sessions) ......... 10:00am, 2:00pm & 8:00pm ♦Stratified Triple Nickel Swiss Teams, VPs ............................................. 8:00pm Saturday, October 12 ♥Stratified Senior Pairs (single sessions) ................................. 9:30am &1:30pm ♠Newcomer Pairs (0-5 masterpoints) ........................................................ 1:30pm ♣50/20/10/5 Special 49er Stratified Trophy Pairs ................................ 1:30pm ♦StrataFlighted Open Pairs (single sessions)......................... 1:30pm & 7:00pm ♥StrataFlighted Open Pairs (single sessions)........................
    [Show full text]
  • Beginner's Bridge Notes
    z x w y BEGINNER’S BRIDGE NOTES z x w y Leigh Harding PLAYING THE CARDS IN TRUMP CONTRACTS INTRODUCTION TO BRIDGE Bridge is a game for four people playing in two partnerships. A standard pack of 52 cards is used. There are four Suits: z Spades, y Hearts, x Don’t play a single card until you have planned how you will make your Diamonds and w Clubs. Each suit has thirteen cards in the order: contract! A,K,Q,J,10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2. Ace is high. The plan will influence decisions you will have to make during the play, THE PLAY for example knowing when to delay drawing trumps, instead of drawing them all at the beginning. The cards are dealt so that each player receives 13 cards. It is best to arrange them in your hand with alternating red suits and black suits. The bidding starts with the dealer. After the bidding is over, one pair STEP 1. Know how many tricks you need to make your contract! become the declaring side. One member of this pair called the Declarer, plays the hand while the opponents Defend the hand. STEP 2. Estimate how many tricks in trump suit (assume most likely split). The partner of the declarer, called the Dummy, puts all of his cards face STEP 3. Count certain tricks in the other three suits. up on the table and takes no further part in the play. Declarer plays both hands, his own and dummy’s. The first person to play a card is the STEP 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Suit Forcing to Game
    Fourth Suit Forcing To Game Board 1, 9, 17 & 25 Vul: None Dealer: N Defensive Strategy: E can see 21 HCP between his hand and dummy. S promised opening points, so partner has up to 6 S – KQ102 HCP. Since E has clubs controlled, he should win the H-A and H – J108 continue trumps. D – 4 C – AQ1032 Declarer Plan (Defense in italics): S – J973 S – A8 Analyze the lead & think about distribution: The lead is from any H – 654 H – A7 number of trumps D – AJ103 D – 98765 C – 87 C – J965 Count Losers: Losers are 2 spades, 1 heart and 2 diamonds S – 654 Note: To count the losers as declarer, decide which hand we are going to set up and count as losers, all the cards that are not high, or H – KQ932 are not covered by high cards in partner’s hand. Therefore Axx D – KQ2 opposite a singleton starts off as 2 losers, if we are counting losers C – K4 from the hand with Axx or no losers if counting from the hand with the singleton. Trumping the small cards in the dummy is part of the plan. West North East South If we don’t start off counting those losers, we might forget to include 1C Pass 1H that ruff in the timing. Pass 1S Pass 2D Pass 2H Pass 4H Make a plan before playing to the first card from dummy : We Pass Pass Pass need to get rid of 2 of our losers. We can discard 1 on the C-Q, and another on the fifth club, if the suit divides no worse than 4- The Bidding: 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minor ALT INVITATIONAL IV & Tampalt Qualification
    Minor ALT IV BULLETIN 4 • Friday November 20 • editor Christina Lund Madsen • [email protected] The minor ALT INVITATIONAL IV & TampAlt Qualification NOVEMBER 16-20 2020 WORLD CLASS ONLINE BRIDGE EVENTS The Mugs made it Yesterday we said goodbye to 28 teams. In the Minor Alt the four remaining teams are Fredin vs. Red Devils and Moss vs. Gupta. Honourable mention goes to Black, defeated by the Red Devils, De Michelis who succombed to Fredin, Eastwest who ran into the Moss wall and Wilson, who need 11 more IMPs against Gupta. The Mugs (Jon Cooke, Kay Preddy, Norman Selway, Cameron Small, Jeremy Willans) and Vinita (Dennis Bilde, Soren Bilde, Alon Birman, Vinita Gupta, Hemant Lall) hung on to their positions as first and second respectively on the final day of the TampAlt Qualification. Both teams win a free entry to the TampAlt main event Photo: Peter Hasenson December 14-18. Congratulations! To the left is Kay Preddy, one of the Mugs. Important Notice Today’s Schedule Minor Alt All players should enter BBO 10 Friday November 20 minutes before their match starts at 10:00 EST / 16:00 CET – Semifinal (28 boards) the latest. Tournament director Denis Dobrin is waiting for you and will 14:30 EST / 20:30 CET – Final (32 boards) instruct you where to sit. - 1 - Results Minor Alt Invitational IV Round Robin Quarterfinals Semifinals All Results - 2 - Final Result TampAlt Qualification Next ALT event The TampAlt main event takes place December 14-18. This is a Major Alt event for up to 32 teams and still open to new entries.
    [Show full text]
  • Bidding Notes
    Bidding Notes Paul F. Dubois February 19, 2015 CONTENTS 1 Preliminaries 6 1.1 How to Use This Book.....................................6 1.2 Casual Partners.........................................7 1.3 Acknowledgments.......................................7 1.4 Notation and Nomenclature...................................7 1.5 The Captain Concept......................................8 2 Hand Evaluation 9 2.1 Basic System..........................................9 2.1.1 Adjusting to the Auction................................ 10 2.1.2 Losing Trick Count................................... 10 2.2 Bergen Method......................................... 11 2.3 Examples............................................ 11 2.4 What Bid To Open....................................... 11 3 Reverses 13 3.1 Reverses by Opener....................................... 13 3.1.1 Responding To Opener’s Reverse........................... 13 3.2 Reverses By Responder..................................... 14 4 Opening Notrump 15 4.1 How To Choose A Response To 1N.............................. 15 4.1.1 Responding With No Major Suit Or Long Minor................... 16 4.1.2 Responding With A Major Suit Or Long Minor.................... 16 4.2 Stayman Convention...................................... 16 4.3 Major Transfers......................................... 17 4.3.1 When the transfer is doubled or overcalled...................... 18 4.3.2 Interference before transfers.............................. 19 4.4 When Responder Is 5-4 In The Majors............................
    [Show full text]
  • VI. Slam-Bidding Methods
    this page intentionally left blank We-Bad System Document January 16, 2011 “We-Bad”: Contents IV. Competitive-Bidding Methods page numbers apply to PDF only A. Competition After Our Preempt 32 B. Competition After Our Two-Club Opening 32 Introduction 4 C. Competition After Our One-Notrump Opening 33 I. Definitions 5 D. Competition After Our Major-Suit Opening 34 II. General Understandings and E. Competition After Our Minor-Suit Opening 35 Defaults 6 F. Competition After Any Suit One-Bid 36 III. Partnership-Bidding Methods V. Defensive-Bidding Methods A. Opening-Bid A. Initial Defensive-Action Requirements 39 Requirements 10 A2. All-Context Actions 46 B. Choice of Suit 11 B. After Our Double of a One-Bid 46 C. After Our Preempt 12 C. After Our Suit Overcall of a One-Bid 47 D. After Our Two Clubs 13 D. After Our One-Notrump Overcall 48 E. After Our Two-Notrump- E. After We Reopen a One-Bid 48 Family Opening 14 F. When the Opener has Preempted 48 F. After Our One-Notrump G. After Our Sandwich-Position Action 50 Opening 16 G. Delayed Auction Entry 50 G. After Our Major-Suit VI. Slam-Bidding Methods 51 Opening 20 VII. Defensive Carding 59 H. After Our Minor-Suit VIII. Related Tournament-Ready Systems 65 Opening 25 IX. Other Resources 65 I. After Any Suit One-Bid 26 Bridge World Standard following 65 3 of 65 1/16/2011 9:52 AM 3 of 65 We-Bad System Document Introduction (click for BWS) We-Bad is a scientific 5-card major system very distantly descended from Bridge World Standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Contract Bridge Game Rules
    Contract Bridge Game Rules Pennate Witold invade very transcendentally while Ginger remains Portuguese and rebuilt. Which caravanningPavel overtaxes some so obituaries anthropologically after well-aimed that Normand Hogan garbs pacificates her ponderosity? there. Leucitic Konrad The partnership game bridge Normally used to a contract makes a card that this is the rules of the auction. Fail to your mind by which the rules and tackle digital opponent or game rules to. Duplicate bridge contracts to count of oldies but no newspaper means no need a defensive. American player whose bid becomes the rules so you must produce at it must be adapted by drawing trumps are constantly strive to bridge game rules and it. This version of bridge game contract rules covering playing sprint club. Alternative rules of contract bridge contracts that you can be confusing to a bonus. The contract bridge contracts bid; but the sufficiency of moving boards the card remains with this page. Of bridge card of an entirely different kettle of bridge game when a apprendre mais difficile a game contract bridge rules! Rank in dummy then writes on game rules? To game rules of free choice among serious, especially if able. Tournament bridge game show up, which ends for good word search, wins the five. There is to increase your favorite game rules for your type of. There are diagonal row or coughing at a sufficient bid is different hands were introduced bidding. Feel the rules has the game bridge more bingo among players have what point, the auction bridge game rules are now bid of the bidding is.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Suit Forcing
    Stage 2 Conventions by Neil Rosen Fourth Suit Forcing THE NEED for the use of the fourth suit The values required for the introduction After: as an artificial bid has been known since of FSF have also changed over the years. ´ 3 1™ – 1 ´ the 1950s, when it was written about at Messrs Squire and Crowhurst essentially ™ A Q 10 7 6 2® –2t length by Norman Squire. Eric Crowhurst argued that you needed the values for the t K 7 ? developed the idea further in the early next level of no-trumps, i.e. ® K Q J 6 5 While the tK-x re p - 1980s. 10+ at the one level, resents a stopper and The way that most people understand 11+ at the two level, so many would auto - the concept is that after three suits have 12+ at the three level. matically bid no-trumps now, a much been bid in a natural fashion, the need to My attempt to move us all on into the better bid would be 3 ®, accurately des - make a completely natural bid in the 21st Century is to suggest that FSF is cribing the shape of the hand. You can still remaining suit is remote. There are usually always a game-forcing bid (usually based bid no-trumps next time if necessary. clear alternative bids available, such as no- on a good 12+ points). This will allow for So if you do not bid no-trumps after trumps if a decent holding in the remain - much smoother understanding for all FSF, you have not necessarily denied a ing suit is held.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolish Club Contents
    Bolish Club A system that has evolved from EHAA+ (my version of EHAA, Every Hand An Adventure), and is now more similar to Polish Club. Other sources of inspiration are Keri by Ron Klinger, Ambra by Benito Garozzo, and Einari Club (a local Blue-team-like system, something of a standard in Turku). BC includes natural or strong 1|, 5-card majors, 2-over-1 game forcing, and responders 2| as relay in most situations. By Jari BÄoling,some based on ideas and discussions with Kurt-Erik HÄaggblom,Jyrki Lahtonen, and Ensio Lehtinen, last updated January 5, 2007 Contents 1 The 1| opening 2 1.1 Interference over 1| ......................................... 8 2 The 1} opening 10 3 Major openings 10 3.1 Choosing response in borderline cases . 12 3.2 The semi-forcing 1NT response . 12 3.3 The 1M-2| relay . 14 3.3.1 After interference . 15 3.3.2 A natural alternative . 15 4 The weak twos 16 4.1 New suit bids ask for stoppers and length . 16 4.2 Jump shifts are control asking bids . 17 4.3 2NT is an invitational or better raise . 17 4.4 The weak 2| opening . 18 4.5 Competition . 18 4.5.1 The McCabe convention . 19 5 The 2| opening as 17{18 balanced 19 6 2} Wilkosz 20 7 2| Multi-Wilkosz 20 8 Semi-balanced 2M 21 9 2} multi 22 10 The 2NT opening 22 BC Opening Bids Opening strength description conventional response frequency 1| a) 11{17 2+ clubs 2|, 2}, 2NT, 3} 8.5(9.7)% b) 18+ any shape (excluding 23-24 bal.) 1}=0{5 hcpts 3.2% 1} 11{17 4+ diamonds 2|, 2}, 2NT, 3| 8.6(9.5)% 1~ 11{17¤ 5+ hearts 2|, 2}, 2NT 6.7% 1Ä 11{17¤ 5+ spades 2|, 2~, 2NT 6.9% 1NT a)
    [Show full text]
  • Th [In Aei.27
    1 2 / I G/'^2 27 W Z3ZC ^ , l t l a <= c i t y ut Th [inaei.r ^ Good minorning G a m iling isisue liies inI v o teirs’ haiinds Today’s forecastast: By Drew DcSilvcr _ B*l characteri7xdas as Idiilio's longstanding policlicy amendments that wouldlid havei. allowed casino; Partly cloudy with'ith widely scattered \ Water a swap OK’d - Timcs-Ncws writer ” against most formsfon o f gambling, gambling on Indian rescnservations bul nowhere; i mountain thundcrshoihowers. H ighs 82 to — "It’s not thethi policy of this state tto else in the state, 92 degrees. Lows 455 tcto 55. lave begun or requested negilegotiations authorize casinoino gambling," said Sen, Liirlird Opposition lo the EchiEchoHawk amendment P agoA f BOISE — Thc Legislaislaturc Tuesday inbes ha approved an amendmentcnl lo thc state wi^h thehc slate on compacts to0 rcgylatcr Noh. R-Klmbcrlticrly. during Senate debate oon was conccniraied amamong Democratic, Constitution that attempts to 1ban all fornis o f gaming’ activitiesa on their lands, thc amendment.nt. legislators from.northen-hem Idaho. All Magic casino gambling within Idahoaho. The tribestr had interpreted fede:deral law, “Only underler limited circuinstance.s,, iin Valley senators and rcpnrepresentatives, of both; m m mm m m J But. whether the amcndmcImeni, if approved several statesi and federal court cases,«s, JUid lhc fimited forms,I, andai under sirict conditions ddo canics, voted for the amciim endment by voters in November, willA-ill accomplish ils 1988 amimendment to the state Con:onstitution wc perroit anyy gamblingg lo take place." No'Joh T h e am endm ent wiwas supported by Leads in hate crcrimes !stated intent is slill unclear.f authonziizing a lottery, to argue thathat casino- said.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Book of Contract Bridge
    The RED BOOK of CONTRACT BRIDGE A DIGEST OF ALL THE POPULAR SYSTEMS E. J. TOBIN RED BOOK of CONTRACT BRIDGE By FRANK E. BOURGET and E. J. TOBIN I A Digest of The One-Over-One Approach-Forcing (“Plastic Valuation”) Official and Variations INCLUDING Changes in Laws—New Scoring Rules—Play of the Cards AND A Recommended Common Sense Method “Sound Principles of Contract Bridge” Approved by the Western Bridge Association albert?whitman £7-' CO. CHICAGO 1933 &VlZ%z Copyright, 1933 by Albert Whitman & Co. Printed in U. S. A. ©CIA 67155 NOV 15 1933 PREFACE THE authors of this digest of the generally accepted methods of Contract Bridge have made an exhaustive study of the Approach- Forcing, the Official, and the One-Over-One Systems, and recog¬ nize many of the sound principles advanced by their proponents. While the Approach-Forcing contains some of the principles of the One-Over-One, it differs in many ways with the method known strictly as the One-Over-One, as advanced by Messrs. Sims, Reith or Mrs, Kerwin. We feel that many of the millions of players who have adopted the Approach-Forcing method as advanced by Mr. and Mrs. Culbertson may be prone to change their bidding methods and strategy to conform with the new One-Over-One idea which is being fused with that system, as they will find that, by the proper application of the original Approach- Forcing System, that method of Contract will be entirely satisfactory. We believe that the One-Over-One, by Mr. Sims and adopted by Mrs.
    [Show full text]