J. Indian Water Resour. Soc., Vol. 36, No. 4, Oct., 2016 AN ANALYSIS OF CAUSES AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF EXTREME FLOODS IN JHELUM BASIN Manohar Arora*1, Naresh Kumar1 and Rakesh Kumar1 ABSTRACT In September 2014, an extreme rain event dumped higher than normal torrential rains over and . Local weather station has recorded approximately 156.7 mm amount of rainfall in a day during the flood week in some parts of the flood - affected region. The Jhelum and Chenab rivers overflowed to unprecedented levels causing severe flooding. The state does not have a flood forecasting system. Most of the natural drainage channels have been destroyed due to encroachment. This paper discusses in details the causes and circumstances of the event and its linkage to changing climate. It requires accepting that dealing with climate change impacts is urgent and imperative. Adaptation will require relearning the art and science of water management so that regions such as Kashmir can cope with excess rain in the future. Keywords: Jammu and Kashmir, Jhelum, flood, adaptation, water management al, 2013). Kedarnath disaster (June 2013), Jammu and INTRODUCTION Kashmir disaster (2014), Rudraprayag cloudburst (September The global mean temperature is expected to increase between 2012), Manali cloudburst (July 2011) are few of the major 1.4 to 5.8ºC over the next hundred years. The Himalayan cloudburst events notable for causing great damages to region is subject to significant and uncertain climate human lives and infrastructure. Leh, Kedarnath and Jammu variability. The climate variability brings several impacts, i.e. and Kashmir disasters are one of the most calamitous natural variable rainfall patterns, melting of glaciers, increased disasters in the history of . Nandargi and Dhar (2011) runoff, flooding, and water scarcity. Impending large found that the decadal distribution of these extreme one-day variability in the monsoon’s precipitation levels will bring rainfalls shows that there is a considerable increase in the more extreme events. The consequences of this change in frequencies during the decades 1951–1960 to 1991–2000, global climate are already being witnessed in the Himalayas whereas there is a sudden decrease in the frequencies in the where extreme events are increasing at alarming rates. present decade during 2001–2007, indicating the need to Monsoon rainfall (both mean rainfall and extreme rainfall understand the response of the systems to global change and events) is projected to increase further despite the monsoonal the associated physical and climatological changes. circulation potentially decreasing. Floods account for more than a third of the total natural Recently scientists worldwide proposed that one of the most disasters in the region and affect millions of people. The serious impacts of global climate change may be the increase abundant water during the monsoon results in frequent in frequency and intensity of extreme precipitation events flooding across national boundaries, resulting in lives lost particularly in mountainous regions (Ghosh et al. 2011, IPCC and huge economic damage. Recurring floods of large 2007, Joshi & Rajeevan 2006). Based on numerical climate magnitude and frequency compounded by anthropogenic models a global increasing trend in extreme precipitation factors cause immense damage to lives and property in this events is predicted (Hennessey et al. 1997, Houghton et al. region. Typical reasons for floods in the Himalayan regions 2001, Sen Roy & Balling Jr 2004). are cloudburst, that is, intense rainfall, the outburst of a Barros et al. (2004) and Houze et al. (2007) have shown that landslide dam, the failure of an artificial dam, or a glacial the northwest indentation of the Himalayan Mountains tends lake outburst. Das (2013) explored the geographical causes of to have some of the most intense and tallest convective the Uttarakhand flood and issues related with the disaster storms in the world. However, these deep and severe with possible mitigation. Satluj valley experienced maximum convective storms are typically local and highly intermittent damages due to flash floods during the years 1997, 2000 and so they do not produce widespread rainfall, and this region 2005. It was observed that both natural and anthropogenic remains arid. In contrast, in the eastern Himalayas and over causes were equally responsible for the occurrence of flash the Bay of Bengal and Ganges delta, convective systems tend floods in River Satluj. No single factor could be held to be mesoscale and contain large and persistent stratiform responsible for a particular flash flood. Flash floods are of regions. These mesoscale systems dominate the rainfall varying intensities and occurring mostly during summer climatology of the Indian subcontinent (Romatschke and monsoons. However, the ever increasing occupation of the Houze 2011; Medina et al. 2010; Romatschke et al. 2010) flash flood plains results in huge loss of life and damages (Chauhan et al., 2014). Unusual rainfall events have been taking place in the Himalaya. But the Himalaya has not witnessed such clogging is one of the most vulnerable flood of its rivers by the concrete structures. Not only this, the hazard-prone Himalayan regions in India (Sen 2010; Meraj repeatedly damaged banks (during 1894 and 1970 flash et al. 2013, 2015). Historically, Kashmir Himalayan region floods) have been reoccupied at most of the places (Rana et has witnessed heavy casualties and loss of property due to

1 flooding (Singh and Kumar 2013). Recently the state of Scientists, National Institute of Hydrology, Jammu and Kashmir experienced massive flood in September Roorkee-247 667(Uttarakhand) *E-mail:[email protected] 2014. The Jhelum water rose to dangerous level and became destructive force against the human life and infrastructure. Manuscript No. : 1441 15 J. Indian Water Resour. Soc., Vol 36, No. 4, Oct, 2016

Main purpose of this paper is to identify the reasons of the to the hills, in a zig zag manner. Just before the river enters extreme flood in Jhelum basin. The paper discusses in details the main city of which is situated on its banks, it is the possible short term and long term measures that need joined near Shergari by a stream which drains from . attention. For the flood protection of main city, there is a supplementary channel with a capacity of 500 cusecs just above Srinagar STUDY AREA (near Kursu Padshahi Bagh) which functions only when the The river Jhelum forms by the water of a spring viz. Cheshma river discharge rises above the danger mark. Below the situated at the foot hills accommodating Srinagar city, the flow of Dudh-ganga combines with the in the south eastern corner of the and flows river and down below nallah Sindh merges with it at towards west through the Kashmir Valley (Figure 1 and 2). In Shadipora on the right bank. At Banyari ,20 kms. the course upto town 3 major tributaries viz. downstream, the river joins with the water of Wullar Lakes Sandran river, Bringi river and Arapath join on its right flank. and takes off from the lake at its south west corner and flows Lidder, the biggest river of all the effluents that form the head to the west south west direction through the alluvial plain for waters of river Jhelum and is fed by a number of glaciers a length of 21 kms. upto the bridge at . At from the high ranges, joins on its right flank at 2 km. Baramulla the river enters a gorge in the hills. After flowing downstream of Khannabal town. River Vishow and Rambiara through this gorge for about 5 kms, the fall out channel takes drain their water on its left flank at 4.82 Kms. upstream from off a sharp bend towards the left. The end of the gorge at Sangam town. Between Sangam and Srinagar, Khadanyar is marked by huge rock projecting into the river receives two small streams viz. Watlara and Arapal on the from the left side. Below Khadanyar, river takes a sharp turn right flank, and three small streams viz. Rambiara, Sasara, rushing over rapids from Wullar Lake to Khadanyar in a Romuhi on the left flank. Romushi river ,ordinarily stretch of 26 Kms. Number of streams viz. Wingle, Pohru, insignificant ,swells up considerably when it is joined by spill Vij meet the river. from Rambiara river. From Khanabal to Srinagar, river Jhelum flows along the right side of the valley abutting close

Fig. 1: Jhelum River Basin upto Uri 16 J. Indian Water Resour. Soc., Vol 36, No. 4, Oct, 2016

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION SEPTEMBER 2014 FLOOD It was observed that intense rains in the state from 1st to 7th of September 2014 caused the floods. The causes of excessive rainfall were the combined effect of the western disturbances (WD) and its interaction with monsoon rains over J&K. The high rainfall in the south Kashmir and along the Pir Panjal mountains gives weight to the influence of the monsoons in the observed extreme rainfall preceding the 2014 Kashmir floods. With the urbanized and mismanaged floodplains of Jhelum lending impetus, the situation attained disastrous dimensions due to the prolonged extreme precipitation events observed over the entire Kashmir valley during the first week of the September, exacerbated by the higher snowmelt runoff from the extensive snow-packs observed in the mountainous regions this year. There are also reports of several cloudbursts in the upper reaches of the Jhelum basin during the period and the sudden and drastic increase of the water levels in the Jhelum basin have been ascribed to these hearsay cloudbursts. The cloudburst reported in the area is said to have increased the water level in Sindh nallah by 75 cm in just 2 hours. Similarly, the cloudburst reported in Kounsarnag mountains in south Kashmir is believed to have drastically increased the turbulent flow of the Vishav nallah causing tremendous damage to infrastructure and crops along its banks. However, there is no instrumental or satellite data Fig. 2: Digital Elevation Model of the Jhelum Basin evidence of these reported cloudbursts in the entire basin. Table1: Rainfall during the two week flood period (Source IMD) Aug. 28 to Sept. 3, 2014 Sept. 4 to Sept. 10, 2014 State/District Actual Normal Dep. Cat. Actual Normal Dep. Cat. (mm) (mm) (per (mm) (mm) (per cent) cent) Jammu & Kashmir 43.2 27.9 55 E 267.7 30.3 792 E Anantnag 93.2 15.6 497 E 309.1 17.3 1,687 E Badgam 35.8 8.4 326 E 76.7 19.5 293 E - 9.5 - - - 10.3 - - Baramula 25.6 13.3 92 E 255.9 16.1 1,489 E Doda 42.6 18.5 130 E 320.8 37.0 787 E Ganderwal 91.2 9.2 891 E 32.6 9.8 233 E Jammu 40.2 37.6 7 N 354.2 39.3 801 E Kargil - 1.4 - - - 5.7 - - Kathua 4.2 56.7 -93 S 193.2 24.4 692 E Kistwar - 18.5 - - - 37 - - 80.3 19.3 316 E 460.2 23.6 1,850 E 7.6 11.7 -35 D 129.2 6.2 1,984 E Ladakh(Leh) 10.2 1.2 750 E 10.5 3.6 192 E Poonch 14.1 31.9 -56 D 10.8 53.9 -80 S 50.0 6.5 669 E 242.7 13.4 1,711 E Rajouri 49.4 27.8 78 E 43.2 22.5 92 E Ramban 92.7 20.5 352 E 425.6 34.2 1,144 E Reasi 69.6 100.7 -31 D 556.0 54.2 926 E Samba 20.2 37.6 -46 D 47.4 39.3 21 E 58 17.8 226 E 348.0 11.4 2,953 E Srinagar 43.5 9.2 373 E 148 9.8 1,410 E Udhampur 25 86.0 -71 S 605.5 68.4 785 E Dep.: Departure, Cat.: Category N: Normal, E: Excess, S: Scanty, D:Deficit

Analysis of pre and post flood satellite images (NSIDC) revealed that snowmelt had a very little role to play as the pre-flood and post flood images (Fig. 3) showed that there was not much difference in the snow cover. 17

J. Indian Water Resour. Soc., Vol 36, No. 4, Oct, 2016

On September 4th, 2014 J&K experienced 30 hour long valley with the mean rainfall of 26.6 mm but the summer rainfall that has broken the record of many decades; the major capital of the state recorded about 173 mm of rainfall in the parts of the state recorded an average of more than some first week of Sept., crossing its 25 year high of 151.9 mm aspects of catastrophic rain fall in J&K. Some parts of the preceding the 1992 floods. 7-day antecedent rainfall recorded state experienced more than 650mm of rainfall in 3 days. at certain places in the south Kashmir like crossed Even moderate rainfall was also recorded in Ladakh region. 617 mm of rain. From the analysis of the precipitation records September was not considered rainy season in the Kashmir from the Automatic Weather Stations, it is observed that and Ladakh region, but this year both these region have South Kashmir, on an average, received rainfall almost twice recorded moderate to heavy rainfall. Although rain in Jammu to that of the central and north Kashmir that generated region during September was a normal phenomenon but the enormous surface runoff and baseflow leading to a deluge in intensity was very high. In Jammu region such huge rainfall the basin. was earlier recorded in 1903, 1908, 1926, 1942 and 1988. The rainfall data collected from Indian Metrological Kashmir valley experienced such intensity rainfall in department (IMD) from 28th August to 10th September 2014 1903,1911,1917,1928 and 1992 (IMD). As per the analysis of for Jammu and Kashmir also revealed that actual rainfall the archived meteorological data for the last 125 years for the received (1645mm) in South Kashmir area was way above Srinagar city, September is the least rainy month for the normal (124.9mm) rainfall. (Anantnag = 402.3mm, Kulgam =

Fig. 3: MODIS 10A2 Snow Cover images showing the 8 days maximum snow cover extent in the Jhelum Basin 18

J. Indian Water Resour. Soc., Vol 36, No. 4, Oct, 2016

540.5mm, Shopian = 406mm, Pulwama = 292.7mm) was the drainage capacity of about 35,000 cusecs. The way above normal (Anantnag = 32.9mm, Kulgam = floodwaters entered the Srinagar city through several 42.9mm, Shopian = 29.2mm, Pulwama = 19.9) rainfall breaches along the weaker sections of its embankments and (Table -1). due to the overflowing of the Jhelum 3-5 ft. above its banks, as the recorded water levels in the river were exceptionally Therefore, the results reveal that South Kashmir region high and much above the drainage capacity of the river in received the maximum amount of rainfall during this period Srinagar. triggering massive floods in Srinagar and its adjoining areas. The flood inundation levels recorded in the floodplains of the Snouts of Kolhai Glacier were also found to be Jhelum were the highest in the archived hydrological history almost intact (Figure 4). However, fresh snowfall might have of Kashmir with vast areas in Kashmir valley inundated, occurred during flood days that were washed away by many of these areas remained under floodwaters for more incessant rains resulting in cold flood water. shows the than a week. Some low lying areas in Srinagar city remained changes in the Land Sat -8 satellite image of 25th, August,

Fig. 4: Snouts of Kolhai Glacier (Google Earth Image 18 September 2014)

Fig. 5: Land Sat 8 (USGS) images showing the water spread in the Jhelum Catchment

th 2014 and 10 , September, 2014 shows the pre and post flood under floodwaters for more than 4 weeks. In south Kashmir, condition of the Jhelum river. several villages and cultivated lands were washed away by the floodwaters of the turbulent mountainous tributaries of The Jhelum waters overflew the embankments for major part the Jhelum like Rambiara, Veshu and Romshi. The Jhelum of its stretch from South Kashmir to the Srinagar city. The was flowing almost 1m above its embankments in the stretch gauge reading at Sangam crossed 36 ft on 5 September 2014 from Sangam to Kakapora for a distance of about 25 km on with the floodwaters measuring about 1,20,000 cusecs and 6-7 September 2014. The river got swollen attaining a width overflowing more than 1 m above the banks. Similarly, the of more than 2 km at certain places in South Kashmir. Out of gauge reading at Srinagar (Ram Munshibagh station) crossed the 1760 sq. km. of floodplains, 912 sq.km were flooded in 30 ft on 7 Sept., 2014 much above the danger mark of 22 ft, the Jhelum basin during the 2014 flooding. The flood discharging more than 70,000 cusecs of floodwaters against 19 J. Indian Water Resour. Soc., Vol 36, No. 4, Oct, 2016 problem in the Kashmir valley is partly due to the inadequate stage of monsoon in India. The causes of excessive rainfall were carrying capacity of the river Jhelum in its length from the combined effect of the western disturbances (WD) and its Sangam to Khandanyar. Just upstream of Srinagar at interaction with monsoon rains over J&K. The rainfall data Padshahibagh, a flood spill channel with the original capacity collected from Indian Metrological department (IMD) from of 17,000 cusecs takes off to by-pass the Srinagar city. 28th August to 10th September 2014 for Jammu and Kashmir However, in spite of flood spill channel, whose capacity is also revealed that actual rainfall received (1645mm) in now reduced to less than 5,000 cusecs due to the siltation, South Kashmir area was way above normal (124.9mm) floods can be caused by Jhelum in the city (particularly south rainfall. This triggered flooding and landslides in the Srinagar), if and when, the discharge of river through the city Kashmir valley. The flood inflow was more than the exceeds 35,000 cusecs. The drainage capacity of the main combined carrying capacity of Jehlum and flood channel Jhelum and the flood spill channel therefore proved despite the natural breaches of huge size on 4th September inadequate to carrying the enormous discharge of floodwater at Kandizal, Chursu, Lelhar, Marwal, Khadermoh, etc. The measuring more than1,20,000 cusecs. urbanized and mismanaged floodplains of Jhelum lending impetus, the situation attained disastrous dimensions. CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT The PRECIS run for 2030’s indicate that annual rainfall in What the Kashmir flood situation has really highlighted is the the Himalayan region is likely to increase in 2030s with importance and urgency for effective and strong adaptation respect to 1970s range from 5% to 13% with some areas of planning. The lack of a flood forecasting network or a Jammu and Kashmir showing an increase up to 50%. weather station in the region and the absence of early warning (SAPCC, 2013). Climate change is responsible for the systems have meant the scale of the humanitarian disaster is increasing trend in the number and intensity of extreme far greater than it had to be. Watershed management needs to be weather events (IPCC, 2014). As per IPCC 5th Assessment integrated with the flood hazard management and mitigation for the Report there will be 30% increase in the incidence of state of Jammu and Kashmir to prevent such disasters in future. extreme rainfall in Asia. Incessant rains may also induce REFERENCES melting of glaciers and add to ferocity of floods and deluge. 1. Barros, A. P., Kim, G., Williams, E., and Nesbitt, S.W., Encroachment of wetlands, construction of 2004. “Probing orographic controls in the Himalayas communication network and other developmental activities during the monsoon using satellite imagery”, Nat. associated with land use change also add to vulnerability and Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 29–51 fragility. 2. Chauhan, R., Sharma, A., and Jamwal, J., 2014. WAY FORWARD “Impacts of River Satluj flash floods in Himachal 1. There is a need for a comprehensive flood risk assessment Pradesh, North Western Himalayan Region”, through computational models. In this regard, the International Journal of Development Research Vol. 4, measurement of rainfall, hydraulics of the channels, and other Issue, 12, pp.2802-2809 ,December, 2014 important parameters are to be worked out accurately. 3. Climate Change 2014. Impacts, Adaptation and 2. Encroachments along the water courses, lakes and Vulnerability, Working Group II contribution to the wetlands must be stopped. Proper monitoring of Land IPCC 5th Assessment Report, Intergovernmental Panel use/Land cover of river basin needs to be done. on Climate Change, Geneva. 3. Watershed management needs to be integrated with the 4. Executive Summary of National Seminar on “Retrospective flood hazard management and mitigation for the state of and Prospective of 2014 flood for Building Flood Resilient Jammu and Kashmir. Kashmir” 15-16 November 2014, Kashmir 4. Structured measures for flood control are not always the 5. Ghosh, S., Das, D., Kao, S. and Ganguly, A. R., 2011. best possible steps; therefore authorities must think of “Lack of uniform trends but increasing spatial utilizing non-structural measure as well. Community variability in observed Indian rainfall extremes”, based flood management is the key non-structural Nature Climate Change, Vol. 2. measure for pre and post floods management. 6. Hennessey, K.J., Gregory, J.M and Mitchell, J.F.B., 5. Appropriate sediment estimations models, hydrological and 1997. “Changes in daily precipitation under enhanced hydraulic models need to be run for the Jhelum in order to greenhouse conditions”, Climate Dynamics, 13, 667– simulate sediment inputs, flood inundation depth and pattern, 680. and quantification of the hydrological processes. 7. Houghton, J.T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D.J., Noguer, M., Van 6. Need for restoration of the and all other der Linden, P.J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., Johson, C.A., Lakes of the Valley through an integrated scientific plan. (eds)., 2001. “Climate Change 2001:The Scientific 7. Making existing natural drainage networks (inlets and Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third outlets) viable. Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)”, Cambridge University Press, CONCLUSION Cambridge, UK The Jammu and Kashmir state and adjoining areas received heavy rainfall from 1st September 2014 onwards, during last 20 J. Indian Water Resour. Soc., Vol 36, No. 4, Oct, 2016

8. Houze, R.A. Jr., Wilton, D.C., and Smull, B.F., 2007. 15. Nandargi, S., and Dhar, O. N., 2011. “Extreme rainfall “Monsoon convection in the Himalayan region as seen events over the Himalayas between 1871 and 2007”, by the TRMM Precipitation Radar”, Quart. J. Roy. Hydrol. Sci. J. 56(6), 930–945. Meteor. Soc.,133,1389–1411 16. National Snow and Ice Data Center, 9. IPCC, 2007. “IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007”, Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. 17. Rana, N., Singh, S,. Sundriyal, Y. P and Juyal, N., 2013. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor and H.L. “Recent and past floods in the Alaknanda valley: causes Miller (eds.). Contribution of Working Group I to the and consequences”, Current Science, Vol.105, No.9, pp Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental 1209-1213. Panel on Climate Change, 2007. Cambridge University Press, UK 18. Romatschke, U., Medina, S,.and Houze, R. A. Jr., 2010. “Regional, seasonal, and diurnal variations of 10. Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). convection in the South Asian monsoon region”, J. 2012, “Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Climate, 23, 419–439. Disasters to Advance Climate ChangeAdaption” 19. Romatschke, U., and Houze, R.A.Jr., 2011. 11. Joshi, U.R. and Rajeevan, M., 2006. “Trends in “Characteristics of precipitating convective systems in Precipitation Extremes over India”, National Climate the South Asian monsoon”, J. Hydrometeor, 12, 3–26 Centre Research Report No: 3/2006 20. Sen, D., 2010. “Flood Hazards in India and 12. Medina, S., Houze, R. A. Jr., Kumar, A., and Niyogi, D,. management strategies”, Natural and Anthropogenic. 2010. “Summer monsoon convection in the Himalayan Springer, The Netherlands region: Terrain and land cover effects”, Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,136, 593– 616. 21. Sen Roy, S., and Balling, R. C., 2004. “Trends in Extreme Daily Precipitation Indices in India”, 13. Meraj, G., Yousuf A.R., and Romshoo, S.A., 2013. International Journal of Climatology 24: 457–466 “Impacts of the Geo-environmental setting on the flood vul-nerability at watershed scale in the Jhelum 22. Singh, O., Kumar, M., 2013. “Flood events, fatalities basin”, M Phil dissertation, University of Kashmir, and damages in India from 1978 to 2006”, Nat India Hazards , 69(3):1815-1834 14. Meraj, G., Shakil, A. R., Yousuf, A. R., Altaf, S., 23. State Action Plan on Climate Change-2013: J&K. Aftab, F., 2015. “Assessing the influence of 24. USGS, Using the USGS Landsat 8 products, watershed characteristics on the flood vulnerability of Jhelum basin in Kashmir Himalaya”, Nat Hazards , 123

21