DOCSLIB.ORG

BCS Paper 2017/64 2018 Review of UK Parliament Constituencies Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BCS Paper 2017/64 2018 Review of UK Parliament Constituencies Draft Boundary Commission for Scotland BCS Paper 2017/64 2018 Review of UK Parliament Constituencies Draft Revised Proposals for Aberdeen City, Aberdeenshire, Angus and Dundee City council areas Action required 1. The Commission is invited to consider responses to the initial and secondary consultation on its Initial Proposals and whether it wishes to make changes to its proposals for Aberdeen City, Aberdeenshire, Angus and Dundee City council areas. Background 2. The Commission's Initial Proposals for this area comprise 5 constituencies which exactly cover Aberdeenshire, Angus and Dundee City council areas and 2 constituencies which exactly cover Aberdeen City council area. A map of the constituencies is at Appendix A. Initial Proposals Constituency Council areas Wards (2007–2017) electorate parity Aberdeen North Aberdeen City 1-6, 7(part) 75,791 1.3% Aberdeen South Aberdeen City 7(part), 8-13 74,444 -0.4% Angus Glens and Angus (part) 1-5, 6(part) 78,156 Dundee East Dundee City (part) 6, 8 4.3% Banff and Buchan Aberdeenshire 1-7, 8(part), 9(part) 76,878 2.7% Dundee Dundee City 1-5, 7 76,317 2.0% Gordon and Deeside Aberdeenshire 8(part), 9(part), 10- 74,069 15 -0.9% Kincardine and Angus Aberdeenshire (part) 16-19 76,784 East Angus (part) 6(part), 7, 8 2.6% 3. The Commission considered revised proposals for these areas at its meeting of 13 April 2017, see Paper 2017/62. The Commission considered that Option 1 presented more of an improvement on its Initial Proposals than Option 2 and deferred consideration of Option 3. The Commission asked the Secretariat to further develop Option 1, with a view to incorporating as much of Deeside as possible within Gordon and Deeside; without causing excessive disruption to local ties at Peterculter, and without necessitating unmanageable consequent disruption to local ties in Angus. 4. Option 1 (Appendix B): aimed to place Banchory within the Dee Valley and minimise change to the Initial Proposals by retaining the proposed Banff and Buchan and Dundee constituencies. Option 1 also placed Midstocket within Aberdeen South and adopted constituency boundaries suggested by Angus Council. However Option 1 created a constituency covering 3 council areas, some areas of the Dee Valley were still out-with Gordon and Deeside and it transferred a large number of electors between Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire council areas. Document name 1 BCS_2017_64_(Aberdeen_Aberdeenshire_Angus_Dundee_Revised_Proposals) Boundary Commission for Scotland BCS Paper 2017/64 Option 1 Constituency Council area Wards Electorate Parity (2007-2017) Banff and Aberdeenshire 1-7, 8(part), 76,878 2.7% Buchan 9(part) Gordon and Aberdeenshire 10-12, 14-16, Deeside 8(part),9(part), 73,753 -1.4% 13(part) Aberdeen North Aberdeen City 1-6 78,063 4.2% Aberdeenshire 13(part) Aberdeen South Aberdeen City 7, 8, 10-13, 77,326 3.3% 9(part) Kincardine and Aberdeen City 9(part) Angus North Aberdeenshire 17-19 72,309 -3.4% Angus 2, 3, 8, 6(part), 7(part) Angus South Angus 1, 4, 5, 6(part), and Dundee 7(part) 77,793 3.9% East Dundee City 6, 8 Dundee Dundee City 1-5, 7 76,317 2.0% 5. Option 3 (Appendix D) designed 2 constituencies for Aberdeen City council area and 5 constituencies for Aberdeenshire, Angus and Dundee City council areas. The purpose of the suggestion was to prove that it is possible to design constituencies throughout Scotland without splitting any wards but the author admits the suggestion does not consider local ties. Option 3 does not split any wards but it separates Banchory from other communities in Deeside. Option 3 Constituency Council area Wards Electorate Parity (2007-2017) Aberdeen North Aberdeen City 1-2, 4-8 78,274 4.5% Aberdeen South Aberdeen City 3, 9-13 71,961 -3.9% Banff and Buchan Aberdeenshire 1-7, 9 77,582 3.6% Gordon and Mar Aberdeenshire 8, 10-15 73,365 -1.9% Kincardine and Aberdeenshire 16-19 76,952 2.8% Arbroath Angus 6-8 Forfar Angus 1-5 76,693 2.5% Dundee City 1, 6 Dundee Dundee City 2-8 77,612 3.7% Representations received 6. A more detailed record of representations received for these areas was described in Paper 2017/62, but to summarise approximately 280 responses were received during the two consultation periods for these areas. 7. Approximately 240 of these responses were received from Banchory electors opposing the Commission’s proposals as they split Deeside between constituencies. However there was also some support for the Deeside boundary from the Scottish Liberal Democrats. Document name 2 BCS_2017_64_(Aberdeen_Aberdeenshire_Angus_Dundee_Revised_Proposals) Boundary Commission for Scotland BCS Paper 2017/64 8. Angus Council suggested an alternative boundary that they believe better reflects local ties and Scottish Parliament constituency boundaries. Aberdeenshire Council suggested creating constituencies based on using whole wards which come into effect in May 2017. 9. The Scottish Labour Party and Scottish Liberal Democrats support the Commission's Initial Proposals in this grouping. The Conservative and Unionist Party suggest that Banchory be placed in a constituency with other communities in Deeside but they did not provide any alternative constituency boundaries. Consideration of representations 10. The majority of responses to the consultations oppose the division of Deeside between constituencies in Aberdeenshire. There were very few comments on the Initial Proposals regarding Angus, Aberdeen and Dundee. 11. The main issues raised by respondents opposing the Initial Proposals are strong links between communities within Deeside and no ties between Angus and Deeside as the Cairngorms act as a natural boundary between the areas. However the Scottish Liberal Democrats support the Initial Proposals and historically Banchory has been split between constituencies in Deeside (West Aberdeenshire and North Angus and Mearns constituencies between 1974- 1983). 12. The Commission received no alternative suggestions to improve the Initial Proposals in Deeside. 13. Banchory has an electorate of approximately 7,800 and adding these electors to the proposed Gordon and Deeside constituency (74,069 electors) would create a constituency with an electorate exceeding the quota for this review. 14. Further consideration of these areas was described in Paper 2017/62. Options 15. Option 1 added Westhill from Aberdeenshire to an Aberdeen North constituency. As there are approximately 8,900 electors in Westhill, Peterculter from Aberdeen City with approx. 3,700 electors was included in a Kincardine and Angus North constituency. Option 1 also adopted suggested boundaries in Aberdeen and Angus. 16. Option 3 designed constituencies based on using whole wards. 17. The Commission asked the Secretariat to further develop Option 1 and deferred making a decision on Option 3. 18. Option 4 aims to improve Option 1 by also placing Banchory within a Deeside constituency but minimising changes to the Initial Proposals elsewhere. 19. Option 4 amends the boundary between the proposed Banff and Buchan and Gordon and Deeside constituencies by following a river. The boundary splits a single ward between these constituencies while the Initial Proposals split 2 wards. Document name 3 BCS_2017_64_(Aberdeen_Aberdeenshire_Angus_Dundee_Revised_Proposals) Boundary Commission for Scotland BCS Paper 2017/64 20. Option 4 transfers approximately 2,000 electors by Blackburn and 980 electors by Potterton in Aberdeenshire, to an Aberdeen North constituency. The proposed boundary by Blackburn follows a railway line, historic ward and community council boundary and the A96 dual-carriageway. The boundary by Potterton follows natural features (river and hilltop). Option 4 transfers a smaller number of electors than Option 1 so does not necessitate a balance of electors elsewhere in Aberdeen. 21. Option 4 places Banchory within a Gordon and Deeside constituency but a small area of Deeside (Drumoak) is separated. This area has also been split in Option 1. There are approximately 1,300 electors by Drumoak (between Banchory and Peterculter) and adding these electors to a Gordon and Deeside constituency would exceed the electoral quota. However Drumoak could be added to an Aberdeen South constituency as the Dee flows into Aberdeen. 22. In Aberdeen City, Option 4 only makes a minor change to the boundary between the proposed Aberdeen North and South constituencies in ward 7 (Midstocket/ Rosemount). It places Midstocket within an Aberdeen South constituency. The initial proposals also split Aberdeen ward 7 but it followed a different boundary. 23. In Angus Option 4 places the Glens within a single constituency and adopts suggestions: linking Arbroath with the proposed Angus Glens and Dundee East constituency to create a constituency named Angus South and Dundee East; linking Brechin and Forfar with the proposed Kincardine and Angus East constituency; and following new ward boundaries by Friockheim. 24. Option 4 also retains the existing Dundee constituency. Option 4 Constituency Council area Wards Electorate Parity (2007-2017) Aberdeen City 1-6, 7(part), Aberdeen North 77,351 3.3% Aberdeenshire 8(part), 12(part) Aberdeen South Aberdeen City 7(part), 8-13 75,961 1.6% Angus South and Angus 1,4,5, 6(part), 7(part) 71,402 -4.7% Dundee East Dundee City 6 and 8 Banff and Buchan Aberdeenshire 1-7, 8(part), 9 78,079 4.2% Dundee Dundee City 1-5, 7 76,317 2.0% Gordon and 8 (part), 10, 11, Aberdeenshire 78,354 4.6% Deeside 12(part), 13-16 Kincardine and Aberdeenshire 17-19 74,975 0.3% Angus North Angus 1-3, 6(part), 7(part), 8 Summary of Options 25. The advantages of the Initial Proposals are: they created 2 constituencies within Aberdeen City council area; aimed to retain a Banff and Buchan constituency; and during the consultations there was little opposition to the proposals in Aberdeen, Angus and Dundee. However there was strong opposition to the Initial Proposals in Banchory as Deeside was split between constituencies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REGISTER of MEMBERS' INTERESTS NOTICE of REGISTRABLE INTERESTS Councillor Wendy Agnew Ward 18
    REGISTER OF MEMBERS’ INTERESTS NOTICE OF REGISTRABLE INTERESTS Councillor Wendy Agnew Ward 18 – Stonehaven and Lower Deeside 1. Remuneration 2. Related Undertakings N/A 3. Contracts with the Authority N/A 4. Election Expenses None 5. Houses, Land and Buildings Residence – land and building at Upper Craighill, Arbuthnot, Laurencekirk, AB30 1LS, owner and occupier 6. Interest in Shares and Securities N/A 7. Non-Financial Interests Manager of Agnew Insurance Appointed trustee of Stonehaven Recreation Ground (deleted 05/09/14) 8. Gifts and Hospitality None REGISTER OF MEMBERS’ INTERESTS NOTICE OF REGISTRABLE INTERESTS Councillor David Aitchison Ward 13 – Westhill and District 1. Remuneration Employee of Valuation Office Agency. I hold the post of Valuation Executive. 2. Related Undertakings None 3. Contracts with the Authority None 4. Election Expenses Election expenses of £272 paid by the Scottish National Party 5. Houses, Land and Buildings Joint Owner (mortgaged) of 2 Fare Park Circle, Westhill, Aberdeenshire, AB32 6WJ 6. Interest in Shares and Securities None 7. Non-Financial Interests None 8. Gifts and Hospitality None REGISTER OF MEMBERS’ INTERESTS NOTICE OF REGISTRABLE INTERESTS Councillor Amanda Allan Ward 13 – Westhill and District 1. Remuneration Costco Wholesale, Endeavour Drive, Westhill, AB32 6UF - Service Clerk 2. Related Undertakings None 3. Contracts with the Authority None 4. Election Expenses £60 from SNP Council Group 5. Houses, Land and Buildings Shared ownership of Waulkmill Croft, Sauchen, Inverurie, AB51 7QR (no interest as of January 2015 - deleted 15/05/15) 6. Interest in Shares and Securities None 7. Non-Financial Interests Appointed as Garioch Area Committee representative on Garioch and North Marr Community Safety Group in 2012 (added 15/05/15) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • By-Election Results: Revised November 2003 1987-92
    Factsheet M12 House of Commons Information Office Members Series By-election results: Revised November 2003 1987-92 Contents There were 24 by-elections in the 1987 Summary 2 Parliament. Of these by-elections, eight resulted Notes 3 Tables 3 in a change in winning party compared with the Constituency results 9 1987 General Election. The Conservatives lost Contact information 20 seven seats of which four went to the Liberal Feedback form 21 Democrats and three to Labour. Twenty of the by- elections were caused by the death of the sitting Member of Parliament, while three were due to resignations. This Factsheet is available on the internet through: http://www.parliament.uk/factsheets November 2003 FS No.M12 Ed 3.1 ISSN 0144-4689 © Parliamentary Copyright (House of Commons) 2003 May be reproduced for purposes of private study or research without permission. Reproduction for sale or other commercial purposes not permitted. 2 By-election results: 1987-92 House of Commons Information Office Factsheet M12 Summary There were 24 by-elections in the 1987 Parliament. This introduction gives some of the key facts about the results. The tables on pages 4 to 9 summarise the results and pages 10 to 17 give results for each constituency. Eight seats changed hands in the 1987 Parliament at by-elections. The Conservatives lost four seats to Labour and three to the Liberal Democrats. Labour lost Glasgow, Govan to the SNP. The merger of the Liberal Party and Social Democratic Party took place in March 1988 with the party named the Social and Liberal Democrats. This was changed to Liberal Democrats in 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reconsideration of Pictish Mirror and Comb Symbols Traci N
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations December 2016 Gender Reflections: a Reconsideration of Pictish Mirror and Comb Symbols Traci N. Billings University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, European History Commons, and the Medieval History Commons Recommended Citation Billings, Traci N., "Gender Reflections: a Reconsideration of Pictish Mirror and Comb Symbols" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 1351. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/1351 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GENDER REFLECTIONS: A RECONSIDERATION OF PICTISH MIRROR AND COMB SYMBOLS by Traci N. Billings A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Anthropology at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee December 2016 ABSTRACT GENDER REFLECTIONS: A RECONSIDERATION OF PICTISH MIRROR AND COMB SYMBOLS by Traci N. Billings The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2016 Under the Supervision of Professor Bettina Arnold, PhD. The interpretation of prehistoric iconography is complicated by the tendency to project contemporary male/female gender dichotomies into the past. Pictish monumental stone sculpture in Scotland has been studied over the last 100 years. Traditionally, mirror and comb symbols found on some stones produced in Scotland between AD 400 and AD 900 have been interpreted as being associated exclusively with women and/or the female gender. This thesis re-examines this assumption in light of more recent work to offer a new interpretation of Pictish mirror and comb symbols and to suggest a larger context for their possible meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotspots of Farm Business Diversification in Scotland
    Hotspots of farm business diversification in Scotland Jonathan Hopkins1, Carla Barlagne1, Lee-Ann Sutherland1, Keith Matthews2, Andrew Barnes3, Luiza Toma3 1Social, Economic and Geographical Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen 2Information and Computational Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen 3Land Economy and Environment Group, Scotland’s Rural College, Edinburgh On-farm wind turbine in Aberdeenshire Purpose of document This note forms an output of Research Deliverable 2.4.2 ‘How Rural Economies Can Adapt to Key External Drivers’, undertaken as part of the RESAS Strategic Research Programme (2016-2021). This work has helped to “…identify indicators of innovation and diversification”1. This note presents an analysis of questionnaire and public datasets to identify areas in Scotland where there is evidence of high levels of farm diversification activity (‘farm diversification hotspots’). The note describes the uptake of non-farming enterprises and income diversification in Scotland, focusing in particular on renewable energy projects and agri-tourism development. Key findings • Levels of diversification are high in the rural areas north of central Scotland: Argyll, Stirling, Perth and Kinross, Fife, and Angus. • Lanarkshire and Aberdeenshire have a high concentration of on-farm renewable energy schemes, in particular onshore wind projects. • Different types of renewable energy technology tend to cluster together. In addition to onshore wind schemes (found frequently in central and eastern Scotland), hydro developments are concentrated in mountainous regions and near the west coast, and solar projects have been developed in the sunnier east (e.g. Fife, Angus). • Evidence suggests that farm diversification into agri-tourism has taken place in accessible scenic regions and in areas close to population centres.
    [Show full text]
  • Claish, Stirling: an Early Neolithic Structure in Its Context
    Proc Soc Antiq Scot, 132 (2002), 65–137 Claish, Stirling: an early Neolithic structure in its context Gordon J Barclay*, Kenneth Brophy‡ & Gavin MacGregor‡ with contributions bySMFoster, D J Hogg, J Miller, S Ramsay, A Saville, J A Sheridan, C Smith&JBStevenson ABSTRACT The excavation of a long timber-built structure of the early Neolithic near Callander (formerly Perthshire, now Stirling Council area) is described. The remains appear to be those of a structure measuring a maximum of c 24m by 8.5m with roughly straight sides and curved terminals, both of which have entrance gaps. About 1m in from both terminals is an arc of five posts; the interior is divided into between five and seven sections by these arcs and by a further three to five transverse screens or lines of posts. The pattern of division closely resembles that observed at the Neolithic site at Balbridie, Aberdeenshire1, and it is argued that Claish, like Balbridie, was a roofed building. At both sites a central area unencumbered by many posts was created, and a relatively greater density of posts in the southern part of the structure perhaps indicates the presence of an upper floor. The relatively clear area contained two pits in which fires had been set, in one case on a layer of pot sherds. Similarities to other, but probably un-roofed, timber structures of the Neolithic of Perthshire and Fife are noted and it is suggested that there was an architectural ‘vocabulary’ in use in the early Neolithic in east-central Scotland. Thirteen samples were radiocarbon-dated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tayside and Grampian Regions and Angus and Kincardine and Deeside Districts (River North Esk) Boundaries Amendment Order 1988
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 1988 No. 349 (S.36) LOCAL GOVERNMENT, SCOTLAND CHANGES IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREAS The Tayside and Grampian Regions and Angus and Kincardine and Deeside Districts (River North Esk) Boundaries Amendment Order 1988 Made - - - - 29th February 1988 Laid before Parliament 10th March 1988 Coming into force - - 1st April 1988 Whereas under section 17(1) of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973((1)) the Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland on 10th November 1987 submitted to the Secretary of State a report on a review conducted under section 14(2) of that Act in which they made proposals for the transfer of certain areas between Angus District in Tayside Region and Kincardine and Deeside District in Grampian Region and in which they also made proposals for changes in electoral arrangements consequential on those changes in local government areas; Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred on him by section 17(2) of the said Act, and of all other powers enabling him in that behalf, the Secretary of State hereby makes the following Order to give effect to the proposals of the Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland as submitted to him: Title and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the Tayside and Grampian Regions and Angus and Kincardine and Deeside Districts (River North Esk) Boundaries Amendment Order 1988, and shall come into force on 1st April 1988. Interpretation 2. In this Order— “the 1977 Regulations” means the Local Government Area Changes (Scotland) Regulations 1977((2)); and (1) 1973 c.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Symbols: Royal and Lordly Residence
    Royal and Lordly Residence in Scotland c.1050 to c.1250: an Historiographical Review and Critical Revision1 Richard D Oram Abstract Academic study of eleventh to thirteenth century high status residence in Scotland has been largely bypassed by the English debates over origin, function and symbolism. Archaeologists have also been slow to engage with three decades of historical revision of traditional socio- economic, cultural and political models upon which their interpretations of royal and lordly residence have drawn. Scottish castle-studies of the pre-1250 era continue to be framed by a ‘military architecture’ historiographical tradition and a view of the castle as an alien artefact imposed on the land by foreign adventurers and a ‘modernising’ monarchy and native Gaelic nobility. Knowledge and understanding of pre-twelfth century native high status sites is rudimentary and derived primarily from often inappropriate analogy with English examples. Discussion of native responses to the imported castle-building culture is founded upon retrospective projection of inappropriate later medieval social and economic models and anachronistic perceptions of military colonialism. Cultural and socio-economic difference is rarely recognised in archaeological modelling and cultural determinism has distorted perceptions of structural form, social status and material values. A programme of interdisciplinary studies focused on specific sites is necessary to provide a corrective to this current situation. One of the central themes in the traditional historiography of medieval Scotland is that in parallel with the emergence from the late 1000s of an identifiable noble stratum comparable to the aristocratic hierarchies of Norman England and Frankish Europe there was an attendant development of new forms in the physical expression of lordship.
    [Show full text]
  • Always Chasing Deer – Further Excavations at Buzzart Dykes and Kincardine Park and New Excavations at Kincardine Castle in 2013 Derek Hall and Kevin Malloy
    25 Always chasing deer – further excavations at Buzzart Dykes and Kincardine Park and new excavations at Kincardine Castle in 2013 Derek Hall and Kevin Malloy Project background Previous excavations In 2010 initial fieldwork was undertaken at the parks The first phase of excavations at Buzzart Dykes in of Buzzart Dykes, Perth and Kinross, Durward’s Dyke, 2010 concentrated on a section across the western Angus and Kincardine Park, Aberdeenshire as part bank and ditch line of the park. This work indicated of a Master’s thesis at the University of Stirling being that the excavated section lay across a former entrance undertaken by Kevin Malloy (Hall et al 2011, Malloy into the park and that at this point the bank was et al 2013). Further study (by Kevin Malloy) for a PhD constructed on a stone base (Hall, Malloy and Oram at the University of Wyoming led to project discussions 2011). This entrance apparently led from the royal in 2012 and 2013 and identified the need for further forest of Clunie directly into the park. work at both Buzzart Dykes and Kincardine Park with some new excavations at Kincardine Castle. Scheduled 2013 season (Illus 1) Monument Consent was granted for these works in May 2013 and the fieldwork at the three sites was For this phase of fieldwork three trenches were carried out between 3rd June and 15th July of that year. excavated by hand across the potential building outside the park to the north east (A), the northern park boundary (B) and a further segment of the Buzzart Dykes western park boundary and ditch line (C).
    [Show full text]
  • Hywind Scotland Pilot Park
    Hywind Scotland Pilot Park Environmental Statement Habitats Regulations Assessment March 2015 COS_140158/01.2015 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 Background 4 1.2 Legislative framework 4 1.3 Approach to HRA 6 1.3.1 HRA screening 6 1.3.2 Appropriate Assessment 7 1.4 Types of European site included in the HRA based on qualifying features 7 1.5 Summary of studies / surveys carried out to inform the EIA and HRA 7 1.5.1 Seabird and marine mammal surveys 8 1.5.2 Migratory fish 8 2 HRA SCREENING – SPECIAL PROTECTION AREAS (SPAS) 9 2.1 Seabird populations in the Project study area 9 2.2 Long list of SPAs requiring consideration in the HRA 12 2.2.1 Identification of relevant SPAs 12 2.2.2 Long list of SPAs 13 2.3 Potential impacts on seabirds (impact pathways) 15 2.4 Assessment of LSE 16 2.5 Assessment of impacts on site integrity 17 2.5.1 Conservation objectives for SPAs 18 2.5.2 Collision risk 19 2.5.3 Disturbance / displacement 22 2.5.4 Conclusions with respect to SPA site integrity 24 3 HRA SCREENING – SPECIAL AREAS OF CONSERVATION (SACS) FOR MARINE MAMMALS 29 3.1 Marine mammals in the Project study area 29 3.2 Long list of SACs requiring consideration in the HRA 30 3.3 Potential impacts on marine mammals (impact pathways) 33 3.4 Assessment of Likely Significant Effects (LSE) 33 3.5 Conclusion from assessment of LSE 36 4 HRA SCREENING – SPECIAL AREAS OF CONSERVATION (SACS) FOR MIGRATORY FISH 37 4.1 Migratory fish in the Project study area 37 4.2 Long list of SACs requiring consideration in HRA 37 4.3 Potential impacts on migratory fish
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Returning Officers
    135 AGENDA ITEM [email protected] THE SCOTTISH OFFICE Home Department St. Andrew’s House Edinburgh EH1 3DG Telephone 0131-244 J-19 ’@ Fax 0131-244 Chief Executives of Unitary Authorities Electoral Registration Officers March 1996 Dear Sirhladam PARLIAMENTARY RETURNING OFFICERS 1. My letter of 6 November 1995 to Chief Executives of the new councils set out the position regarding parliamentary and European parliamentary returning officers after 1 April 1996 (copy attached, EROs only). The letter sought any comments about the councils the Department propose to recommend that the Secretary of State should designate as responsible for appointing a returning officer where a constituency covers more than one unitary authority area. 2. In all but 2 cases the Department’s proposals were acceptable to the councils concerned. In those instances where there was dissension from our proposals the Secretary of State gave careful consideration to the representations that were received from the councils concerned. He was not persuaded, however, that the arguments put forward warranted a departure from the general principles that had been followed and which were outlined in my letter of 6 November. As such, the Secretary of State has agreed that Orders should be made designating the councils, as proposed in my letter, as responsible for appointing returning officers where constituencies cover more than one unitary authority area for: a. existing parliamentary constituencies in the event of a by-election being held between 1 April and the date of the next general election; b. new parliamentary constituencies which would take effect at the next general election; and c.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery & Excavation in Scotland
    1991 DISCOVERY & EXCAVATION IN SCOTLAND An Annual Survey of Scottish Archaeological Discoveries. Excavation and Fieldwork EDITED BY COLLEEN E BATEY WITH JENNIFER BALL PUBLISHED BY THE COUNCIL FOR SCOTTISH ARCHAEOLOGY ISBN 0 901352 11 X ISSN 0419 -411X NOTES FOR CONTRIBUTORS 1 Contributions should be brief statements of work undertaken. 2 Each contribution should be on a separate page, typed or clearly hand-written and double spaced. Surveys should be submitted in summary form. 3 Two copies of each contribution are required, one for editing and one for NMRS. 4 The Editor reserves the right to shorten published contributions. The unabridged copy will be lodged with NMRS. 5 No proofs will be sent to Contributors because of the tight timetable and the cost. 6 Illustrations should be forwarded only by agreement with the Editor (and HS, where applicable). Line drawings should be supplied camera ready to suit page layout as in this volume. 7 Enquiries relating to published items should normally be directed to the Contributor, not the Editor. 8 The final date for receipt of contributions each year is 31 October, for publication on the last Saturday of February following. Contributions from current or earlier years may be forwarded at any time. 9 Contributions should be sent to Hon Editor, Discouery & Excavation in Scotland, CSA, c/o Royal Museum of Scotland, Queen Street, Edinburgh, EH2 1JD. Please use the following format:- REGION DISTRICT Site Name ( parish) Contributor Type of Site/Find NCR (2 letters, 6 figures) Report Sponsor: HS, Society, Institution, etc, as appropriate. Name of Contributor: (where more than one, please indicate which name should appear in the list of contributors) Address of main contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • 74 Waugh Discovering Kincard
    Liberal Heritage Dr Alexander (Sandy) S. Waugh continues the Journal’s series in which well-known Liberal Democrats take a look at the Liberal heritage of their own locality. DISCOVERING KINCARDINESHIRE’S LIBERAL HISTORY incardineshire (aka council in 1975 and since 1996 has Kincardine Aberdeen, in 1600. After Charles The Mearns), with an been within the jurisdiction of Castle, a II was crowned at Scone, in Perth- area of 380 square miles Aberdeenshire Council for local nineteenth- shire, in January 1651, the Hon- and a population of government purposes, although it century manor ours of Scotland – crown, sceptre 45,501 (2001 census), is retains its identity as a Lord Lieu- house. The and sword of state – were taken for Ksituated in North-East Scotland tenancy and for registration and remains of the safety to the coastal Dunnottar Cas- between the North Sea and the postal purposes. There are currently earlier keep are tle, two miles south of Stonehaven. mountains which rise to over 2,500 fifteen councillors for Kincar- located nearby . Thereafter, the castle was besieged feet. It is bounded on the south by dineshire wards, elected by STV, in by Cromwellians from Septem- Angus (aka Forfarshire), on the 2007, for five-year terms: seven Lib- ber 1651 until its surrender in May north and west by Aberdeenshire eral Democrats, four Conservatives 1652. However, in the meantime, and on the north-east by the City and four SNP. the regalia had been smuggled out of Aberdeen Although generally Kincardineshire, since becom- of the castle and hidden beneath the coastal and rural, with the tradi- ing a sheriffdom (county) in the pulpit in the nearby Kinneff parish tional economic activities includ- twelfth century, has played a sig- church, thus being spared the fate ing fishing, farming, forestry and nificant role in Scotland’s history.
    [Show full text]