DOCSLIB.ORG

9000', North 40°, West 106° 43' Routt National Forest, Jackson County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
9000', North 40°, West 106° 43' Routt National Forest, Jackson County Sept 10, 2004, Friday Rabbit Ears Range 9100’, north 40° 5’, west 106° 20’ Sept 11, 2004, Saturday & Sunday Park Range 9000’, north 40°, west 106° 43’ Routt National Forest, Jackson County, Colorado Left Friday morning about 9 AM. Took I-70 west to US-40 and took it over Berthoud Pass. The state is still doing construction on the east side of the pass. Went over Willow Creek pass and stopped at the old hunting place. There were a few hunters in there. I used the opportunity to check the Routt National Forest map but discovered I didn’t have it. And, I could not recall the detailed directions to get to Arapaho Lakes. Including the county road number from Rand west. I drove about a mile past Rand looking for that road, but got sceered and turned around. I was so hosed up I took CR-27 east, which goes from Rand to Gould. I followed it about 10 minutes and decided this wasn’t the road toward Arapaho Lakes. I turned around and went back to Rand and followed CO-14 toward Walden. I figured I could go to Waldon and get a Routt NF map and then go to the lakes. But about 4 or 5 miles past Rand I came on CR-28. It was obvious that this was the road I had been looking for. I took it, without the NF map. After about 10 miles CR-28 intersects with CR-11, which goes south to Seymour Reservoir and then to Arapaho Lakes. About 8 miles later I came onto Slack-Weiss Reservoir. I was slightly encouraged by the amount of water in the 30-acre lake, and in the smaller Ninegar Reservoir just east of Slack-Weiss. They were low, but not real low. I wanted to take a road just prior to these reservoirs that goes back into Two Ledge Reservoir, but I couldn’t find it. Without the map I was not sure exactly where it was. I kept on, past a Flat Lake, a very shallow 15-acre lake that was full, but nearly covered in moss. Bummer. But Flat Lake is probably too shallow to use a float tube on anyway, and I was hoping to do some fishing from the float tube. I drove a few more miles and turned west, drove ½ mile on a 4WD road and camped near Finger Lake, or just up the irrigation stream from it. There were lots of cows in this open range area. Lots of cow shit too. Bummer. I set the tent up and ate an egg salad sandwich and a few goodies. After eating I drove back to Slack-Weiss, thinking I would look much closer for the road. I still couldn’t find it. I traveled a few miles further out on CR-11 and came upon FR-2507. I thought maybe this was the road so I followed it north. (It turns out this road is not even on the Routt NF map.) It has a few turnoffs on the right that “could” go to Two Ledge Reservoir, but I decided to come back later to see where they go. I noticed a lot of hunters’ camps in the area, especially along CR-11 past Slack-Weiss. With that being a fact I did not want to walk around the woods much, for fear of Titan, and to keep from scaring any animals out of the area. I returned to camp, cooked hot dogs and ate. It was getting a bit dark so I broke out the Spanish cards and tried to bone up on my Spanish. No apprendarso mucho. I decided that in the morning I would pack the tent see if I could find Two Ledge, one more time. I would then either go home, go to Wladen to get a map and find another place in the Routt, or find somewhere in the national forests for which I did have maps (Arapaho and Roosevelt, and White River). I drove up roads for a couple of hours and gave up. I took off toward Walden. While in the Arapaho Lakes area I generally have visited Cliff Lake and Disappointment Lake. Cliff Lake is a 10 acre lake at the bottom of a steep, curvy, narrow 4WD road that starts by falling off the end of FR-996. The road stops and a foot path continues about a ½ mile past Cliff Lake in the trees to Disappointment Lake. Cliff Lake, at 9790’, is unimpressive, except for the 1500-foot high, half-mile long cliff that begins on the opposite side of the lake, and continues to the northeast. The lake is fairly shallow. But Disappointment Lake seems to have been ill-named. At least on first look. This single acre lake has no discernable inlet stream, but a steady flow in it’s outlet stream. The water is very clear and apparently very deep at the east end. A most peculiar little lake. The bonus is that if one waits long enough, one will see some of the biggest trout I have seen in the wild. Easily 24 inches long, and fat! They cruise the water at the east and north ends of the lake. These are probably the same trout that I tried to catch when Idelle, Candy and I camped there in the mid 80s. I used the float tube there in 2002 and one of the behemoths brushed my leg, but I never have caught one. I was not about to face more disappointment this time, so I didn’t even go down there. In the mid eighties, from a canoe, I caught one of my nicest rainbows ever at Slack-Weiss. But that fish was dwarfed by the trout at Disappointment Lake. Back in those days mosquitoes were bigger than birds and more plentiful than pine needles. The old ‘77 Dodge van was the mode of tranport. This year the mosquitoes were replaced by cattle so I drove the big Silverado to Walden. I stopped at the national forest office in Walden and bought a $6 Routt NF map. I sat in the truck outside the office and studied the map. Where could I go that I haven’t been to? I decided to go to the northeastern edge of Mt Zirkel Wilderness, specifically, in the Big Creek Lakes area. I decided against getting diesel in Walden, opting to get it on the way back. I had a bit over a half tank. From Walden I took CO-125 northwest to Cowdry and then CR-6W west out of Cowdry. The road is paved for about 8 miles and then turns into a gravel road where it meets CR-7 which goes south to Lake John. Following the gravel road north about 15 miles brings you into Wyoming. But at about mile 8 FR-609 goes west into the forest. FR-609 and FR-660 makes a 20-mile loop through the forest, flanking Big Creek Lake about five miles off of CR-6W. I thought I would take the long loop and camp near Big Creek Lake. I drove into the Routt National Forest on FR-609. As the road climbs the mild slope it quickly turns into a slow goer. At the “top” of these hills the road is pocketed with mud holes. I was planning to find a place to camp in the woods on this hill, or go all the way to Big Creek Lake. A couple of mudholes were scary enough that I had to get out and scout them out to see if I could get though. A sign at CR-6W and FR-609 talked about the road being closed because of high water at some place whose name I could not make out. After all these mudholes I thought I must have already had made it through in that flooded area. After easily driving through a few particularly scary looking mud holes I found a nice place to set the tent near a brilliant gold stand of aspen. I had to do a make shift repair on one of the tent frame pieces that broke while I was setting it up. But, I got the tent up. I ate a sandwich and then explored around the area a bit. I imagined there were hunters were in this area too. I stayed out of the deep woods as much as possible. While I was in the aspen I heard a group of three ATVs come rattling up the road. Later while stickin’ with Titan a Ford Explorer pickup came through. They both came back about an hour later. This was good news because I knew they had came from the Big Creek Lakes area and were going back. That meant the road was passable. I had not been sure before that because I could not tell where the road closure was. After dinner Titan and I did some more stickin. Until dark. Then I sat around and sipped a beer before going into the tent to look at some more Spanish. The big Coleman lantern provided plenty of light. In the morning I heard nobody before I got up, which was a late 8AM. I ate breakfast, cleaned up the dishes and myself, and packed the stuff into the truck. I would explore the area a bit and then make for Big Creek Lakes. The aspen were not in their prime viewing colors, but they were pretty spectacular in places. Including the area near camp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail
    CONTINENTAL DIVIDE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DAY & OVERNIGHT HIKES: COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail THE CENTENNIAL STATE The Colorado Rockies are the quintessential CDT experience! The CDT traverses 800 miles of these majestic and challenging peaks dotted with abandoned homesteads and ghost towns, and crosses the ancestral lands of the Ute, Eastern Shoshone, and Cheyenne peoples. The CDT winds through some of Colorado’s most incredible landscapes: the spectacular alpine tundra of the South San Juan, Weminuche, and La Garita Wildernesses where the CDT remains at or above 11,000 feet for nearly 70 miles; remnants of the late 1800’s ghost town of Hancock that served the Alpine Tunnel; the awe-inspiring Collegiate Peaks near Leadville, the highest incorporated city in America; geologic oddities like The Window, Knife Edge, and Devil’s Thumb; the towering 14,270 foot Grays Peak – the highest point on the CDT; Rocky Mountain National Park with its rugged snow-capped skyline; the remote Never Summer Wilderness; and the broad valleys and numerous glacial lakes and cirques of the Mount Zirkel Wilderness. You might also encounter moose, mountain goats, bighorn sheep, marmots, and pika on the CDT in Colorado. In this guide, you’ll find Colorado’s best day and overnight hikes on the CDT, organized south to north. ELEVATION: The average elevation of the CDT in Colorado is 10,978 ft, and all of the hikes listed in this guide begin at elevations above 8,000 ft. Remember to bring plenty of water, sun protection, and extra food, and know that a hike at elevation will likely be more challenging than the same distance hike at sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand County Master Plan Was Adopted by the Grand County Planning Commission on ______, 2011 by Resolution No
    Grand County Department of Planning and Zoning February 9, 2011 GRAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Gary Salberg, Chairman Lisa Palmer, Vice-Chair Sally Blea Steven DiSciullo George Edwards Karl Smith Ingrid Karlstrom Mike Ritschard Sue Volk GRAND COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS James L. Newberry, Commissioner District I Nancy Stuart, Commissioner District II Gary Bumgarner, Commissioner District III The Grand County Master Plan was adopted by the Grand County Planning Commission on __________________, 2011 by Resolution No. ______________. The Master Plan was prepared by: Grand County Department of Planning & Zoning, 308 Byers Ave, PO Box 239, Hot Sulphur Springs, CO 80451 (970)725-3347 and Belt Collins 4909 Pearl East Circle Boulder, CO 80301 (303)442-4588 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................iv Chapter 1 Planning Approach & Context .................................................................................................1 Chapter 2 Building a Planning Foundation .............................................................................................17 Chapter 3 Plan Elements ...........................................................................................................................32 Chapter 4 Growth Areas, Master Plan Updates & Amendments ..........................................................51 Appendix A Growth Area Maps ...............................................................................................................53
    [Show full text]
  • By Robert C. Pearson, William A. Braddock, and Vincent J. Flanigan, U.S
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral Resources of the Comanche-Big South, Neota-Flat Top, and Never Summer Wilderness Study Areas, North-Central Colorado By Robert C. Pearson, William A. Braddock, and Vincent J. Flanigan, U.S. Geological Survey and Lowell L. Patten, U.S. Bureau of Mines Open-File Report 81-578 1981 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey standards. CONTENTS Page Summary ................................................................ 1 Introduction.............................................................. 3 Previous studies..................................................... 7 Present Investigation............ ................................... 7 Acknowledgments...................................................... 8 Geology ................................................................ 8 Rocks................................................................ 10 Precambrian rocks............................................... 10 Mesozoic sedimentary rocks...................................... 12 Coalmont Formation.............................................. 12 Tertiary volcanic rocks......................................... 12 Tertiary intrusive rocks........................................ 14 White Rlver(?) Formation........................................ 15 Structure............................................................ 15 Interpretation of geophysical data........................................ 16 Introduction........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Intrusive Rocks Northeast of Steamboat Springs, Park Range, Colorado
    Intrusive Rocks Northeast of Steamboat Springs, Park Range, Colorado GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1041 Intrusive Rocks Northeast of Steamboat Springs, Park Range, Colorado By GEORGE L. SNYDER with a section on GEOGHRONOLOGY By CARL E. HEDGE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1041 Delineation of intrusive rock types in a previously unstudied area of Colorado and comparison with related rocks elsewhere in Colorado and Wyoming UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1978 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Snyder, George Leonard, 1927- Intrusive rocks northeast of Steamboat Springs, Park Range, Colorado. (Geological Survey Professional Paper 1041) Bibliography: p. 39 Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1041 1. Intrusions (Geology) Colorado Steamboat Springs region. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic Pre-Cambrian. 3. Geology, Stratigraphic Tertiary. 4. Geology Colorado Steamboat Springs region. 5. Intrusions (Geology)-The West- I. Hedge, Carl E. II. Title. III. Series: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1041. QE611.S69 551.8*8 77-608250 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03131-1 CONTENTS Page P^ Abstract ................................................ 1 Geochronology by C. E. Hedge ............................ 17 Introduction and acknowledgments ....................... 2 Petrography and chemistry of intrusive
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Zirkel Herd
    Approved by Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission December 2012 BIGHORN SHEEP MANAGEMENT PLAN DATA ANALYSIS UNIT RBS-37 Mount Zirkel Herd GAME MANAGEMENT UNIT S73 Prepared for: Colorado Parks and Wildlife By: Jeffrey A. Yost Terrestrial Wildlife Biologist Northwest Region Date: March 26, 2012 Photo Credit: Carlye Keller i DAU RBS-37 (Mount Zirkel Bighorn Sheep) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GMUs: S73 Land Ownership: 26% Private, 62% USFS, 2% State, 10% BLM Posthunt Population: Previous Objective None, 2011 Estimate, 50-75, Preferred Objective 150-200 Posthunt Sex Ratio: Previous Objective None, 2011 Observed 125, Preferred Object 60-80 Figure 1: RBS-37 bighorn posthunt population estimate and observed from 2005 to 2011. Figure 2: Observed posthunt sex ratios for RBS-37 from 2005 to 2011. Figure 3: RBS-37 ram and ewe removals via harvest from biological year 2005 to 2011. 2 Background Information The Mount Zirkel Bighorn Sheep herd (Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep Data Analysis Unit (DAU) RBS-37 is one of the newest herds in Colorado. In January of 2005 forty Rocky Mountain bighorns were released into historical sheep habitat of the Park Range 20 miles west of Walden, Colorado. Since that time the herd has grown substantially providing wildlife viewing, photography, and recently hunting opportunities. DAU RBS-37 consists of one Game Management Unit (GMU) S73. It encompasses 487 square miles (1,353 square kilometers) in Jackson and Routt Counties. No municipalities exist within the DAU boundaries. However, nearby towns include Cowdrey, Walden, and Steamboat Springs. The majority of actual useable sheep habitat is in the western half of the DAU and is comprised of National Forest Service land with most of that lying within the Mount Zirkel Wilderness.
    [Show full text]
  • People and Nature on the Mountaintop a Resource and Impact Study of Longs Peak in Rocky Mountain National Park
    People and Nature on the Mountaintop A Resource and Impact Study of Longs Peak in Rocky Mountain National Park A Project funded by the Rocky Mountain Cooperative Ecosystems Study Unit, Rocky Mountain National Park, and Colorado State University. Ruth M. Alexander, Principal Investigator and Author, Professor of History, Colorado State University Catherine Moore, Graduate Research Assistant, Center for Public History and Archaeology, Colorado State University 2010 “Longs Peak is a citadel. I mean it’s a castle with defenses. And the Keyhole Route just so intricately snakes its way 270 degrees around the mountain, sneaking through the mountain’s defenses to get to the top.” – Mike Caldwell, 2009.1 People and Nature on the Mountaintop • A Resource and Impact Study of Longs Peak in Rocky Mountain National Park INTRODUCT I ON his study examines the history of Longs Peak from Longs may be formidable, but it is also a stunningly the 1920s to the present, providing a narrative beautiful peak widely visible to residents and visitors all Tthat traces over time the values and practices of along the northern Front Range. It captures the eye and the individuals who climbed the peak, their impact on its natural imagination. Rangers throughout the park’s history have and cultural resources, and the efforts of park rangers both recognized its powerful allure to those wishing to experience to facilitate climbing and protect the peak from harm.2 Longs simultaneously its aesthetic splendors and the challenges Peak is an icon of the Rocky Mountain West. It
    [Show full text]
  • Finish Start Finnish Start Finnish
    DAY 5 – THURSDAY, JUNE 16 DAY 4 – WEDNESDAY, JUNE 1515 Steamboat Springs to Granby – 78 miles Steamboat Springs Loop – 52 milesmiles As we leave Steamboat Springs, we climb out of the Yampa River valley up the Most of today’s ride is through undulating topography of Upper steep face of the Park Range through Precambrian gneiss and schist and then Cretaceous sandstone, shale, and coal of the Mesaverde Groupp through granitic rocks to Rabbit Ears (82 to 72 million years old), material that was deposited near the Pass. North of the pass, you’ll see the shore of an ancient seaway. Both underground and open-pit distinctive double towers of Rabbit mines extract coal from 3- to 20-foot (1- to 6-m) thick seams in Ears Peak before you begin your this area. The Flat Tops, the aptly named mountains to the descent. The peak is made up of southwest, are capped by volcanic lava flows of Tertiary age. volcanic material that erupted be- tween 33 and 23 million years ago from the Rabbit Ears Range to the DAY 3 – TUESDAY, JUNE 14 east. Later erosion sculpted the peak Edwards to Steamboat Springs – 80 miles into the “rabbit ears” we see today. Heading north from Wolcott, we skirt the eastern edge of the Whitee Passing Wolford Mountain Reservoir, River Plateau. Uplifted during the Laramide Orogeny (about 70 to 50 the top half of the mountain to the million years ago), the area was formerly a lowland that accumu- east has trees growing on coarse lated nearly 8,000 ft (2,440 m) of Paleozoic sedimentary rocks and Precambrian granite, which has been thrust over barren Cretaceous shale below.
    [Show full text]
  • Off the Beaten Path Day Hikes 2017
    playWinterPark.com Off The Beaten Path Hikes Hiking Recommendations for the Adventurous Hiker Hike: Devil’s Thumb (difficult) Length: 3.93 miles one-way Elevation: Trailhead 9609’ Destination 12,236’ Trailhead Location: From US Hwy 40 between Fraser and Tabernash, take County Road 8 east and follow until the road turns into USFR 128 (water board road). Turn left and after 1 mile take a right continue for.3 miles. The road will end at the trailhead. Trail Description: Begin on the trail walking through the Montane Forest, the trail then follows along a meadow with amazing views of Devil’s Thumb Pass and the surrounding area. When the trail forks at marker 2, take a right towards the Devils Thumb trail. There will be a crossing over cabin creek and the trail will begin to go up hill. As you get higher in elevation the forest will change from subalpine to timberline. The trees will open up as the climb increases in difficulty. When you get close to the top the trail disappears, continue on until you can see the thumb shaped rock formation on the Continental Divide clearly. Hike: King / Betty / Bob Lakes (Easy – Moderate) Length: 1.9 miles one-way Elevation: 11,604’ / 11,552’ Trailhead Location: From the Winter Park Information Center, head 2 miles south on Highway 40, turn left onto CR 80/FDR Rd 149 (Corona Pass), continue 13.5 miles to the top, trailhead parking will be on the north side of the road. Trail Description: Short hike from the Continental Divide to three alpine lakes on the Eastern slope of the Divide.
    [Show full text]
  • WHERE LIFE IS WRITTEN in WATER Why Water Issues Unite, Divide, and Matter So Much in Colorado
    WHERE LIFE IS WRITTEN IN WATER Why Water Issues Unite, Divide, and Matter So Much in Colorado by Greg Walcher Natural Resources Group Grand Junction — Washington, DC IP-1-2021 • March 2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY There is a simple reason why water is Coloradans should resist efforts to change so contentious in Colorado: there isn’t their unique system of water law. That enough. There never has been, and never system, developed in Colorado, forms will be, enough water to supply nearly six the basis of all western water law, and million residents, much less 90 million reopening long-settled issues could people in 16 other states who depend at subject Colorado’s future to decisions in least partly on Colorado water. more populous and powerful states. Colorado averages about 16.5 inches The amount of water stored, for use in of precipitation a year, but much of it Colorado, can be significantly increased: evaporates before ever reaching the • By enlarging already existing streams. It comes mostly in the form of reservoirs, either slightly raising snow, mostly within a four-month period, the dam height, or dredging silt to then it melts and runs rapidly out of the increase the depth, state. Put simply, life in the Centennial • And by adding additional reservoirs State depends on the ability to store water in carefully selected areas, especially during the wet periods, for use during the small sites off the main streams, dry periods. where dams have a much smaller environmental impact. Water must be stored in Colorado, or lost to downstream uses.
    [Show full text]
  • North Park Pronghorn Herd Management Plan
    DRAFT NORTH PARK PRONGHORN HERD MANAGEMENT PLAN DATA ANALYSIS UNIT PH-3 GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS 6, 16, 17, 161, & 171 PREPARED FOR COLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFE BY JEFF YOST THIS PLAN WAS APPROVED BY THE COLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION ON XXXXXX DRAFT PH – 3 HERD MANAGEMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY North Park Pronghorn Herd (DAU PH-3) GMUs: 6, 16, 17, 161, & 171 Posthunt Population: Previous Objective: 1,500–1,600 pronghorn; 2019 Estimate: 1,496 pronghorn. Preferred Alternative: 1,400–1,600 pronghorn Posthunt Sex Ratio (Bucks: 100 Does): Previous Objective: 30-40; Prehunt 2019 observed: 51.9; modeled: 35.3. Preferred Alternative: 30-40 bucks: 100 does 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 NUMBER OF PRONGHORNNUMBER OF 1995 2004 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Population Objective Range Year PH-3 Population Estimate PH-3 modeled population estimate and objective range, 1995 – 2019. 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 NUMBER OF PRONGHORNNUMBER OF 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YEAR Bucks Doe & Fawn Total Harvest PH-3 Harvest Estimates, 1995 - 2019. 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 BUCKS: 100 DOESBUCKS: 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YEAR Sex Ratio Objective Range Modeled Posthunt Observed Prehunt PH-3 Observed Prehunt, Modeled Posthunt, and Sex Ratio Objective Range, 1995 - 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resource Potential of National Forest RARE II and Wilderness Areas in Colorado
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resource potential of National Forest RARE II and wilderness areas in Colorado Compiled By Robert P. Dickerson 1 Open-File Report 86-0364 1986 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Denver, Colorado CONTENTS (See also indices listings, p. 173) Page Introduction..................................................... 1 Grand Mesa, Gunnison, and Uncompahgre National Forests........... 2 Elk Mountains-Collegiate (2-180)............................ 2 Collegiate Peaks Wilderness (NF-180)........................ 2 Elk Mountains-Collegiate (2-180)............................ 5 Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness (NF-047)................... 5 Oh-Be-Joyful (2-181)........................................ 6 Ragged Mountain Wilderness (NF-181)......................... 7 Raggeds (2-181)............................................. 7 Drift Creek (2-182).......................................... 9 Perham Creek (2-183)........................................ 9 Springhouse Park (2-184).................................... 10 Electric Mountain (2-185)................................... 10 Clear Creek (2-186)......................................... 11 Hightower (2-189)........................................... 12 Priest Mountain (2-191)..................................... 12 Salt Creek (2-192).......................................... 12 Battlement Mesa (2-193)....................................
    [Show full text]
  • GRANBY/GRAND LAKE AREA DRAFT STRATEGIC TRAILS PLAN April 2018
    GRANBY/GRAND LAKE AREA DRAFT STRATEGIC TRAILS PLAN April 2018 CONTACT INFORMATION: Prepared For: Prepared By: Headwaters Trails Alliance Kay-Linn Enterprises Meara McQuain, Executive Director Scott Linnenburger, Principal Phone: 970.726.1013 303.241.3301 Email: [email protected] [email protected] Web: www.headwaterstrails.org www.kay-linn.com HEADWATERS TRAILS ALLIANCE Strategic Trails Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS GRAND COUNTY MASTER TRAILS PLAN OVERVIEW...............................................................................................................................1 EXISTING PLANS AND DATA..............................................................................................5 HTA MISSION AND GOALS................................................................................................14 OPPORTUNITIES & CONSTRAINTS................................................................................16 SUBAREA PLANS WINTER PARK/FRASER AREA....................................................................................20-40 GRANBY/GRAND LAKE AREA OVERVIEW.....................................................................................................................41 EXISTING TRAIL CONDITIONS...............................................................................43 STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH SUMMARY..............................................................44 OPPORTUNITIES & CONSTRAINTS........................................................................45 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & BENCHMARKS..............................................................50
    [Show full text]