DOCSLIB.ORG

Financeability of ISP Projects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Financeability of ISP Projects Financeability of ISP Projects Australian Energy Market Commission 27 January 2021 FINAL REPORT Important notice This document was prepared by Cambridge Economic Policy Associates Pty Ltd (trading as CEPA) for the exclusive use of the recipient(s) named herein. The information contained in this document has been compiled by CEPA and may include material from other sources, which is believed to be reliable but has not been verified or audited. Public information, industry and statistical data are from sources we deem to be reliable; however, no reliance may be placed for any purposes whatsoever on the contents of this document or on its completeness. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is given and no responsibility or liability is or will be accepted by or on behalf of CEPA or by any of its directors, members, employees, agents or any other person as to the accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information contained in this document and any such liability is expressly disclaimed. The findings enclosed in this document may contain predictions based on current data and historical trends. Any such predictions are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties. The opinions expressed in this document are valid only for the purpose stated herein and as of the date stated. No obligation is assumed to revise this document to reflect changes, events or conditions, which occur subsequent to the date hereof. CEPA does not accept or assume any responsibility in respect of the document to any readers of it (third parties), other than the recipient(s) named therein. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CEPA will accept no liability in respect of the document to any third parties. Should any third parties choose to rely on the document, then they do so at their own risk. The content contained within this document is the copyright of the recipient(s) named herein, or CEPA has licensed its copyright to recipient(s) named herein. The recipient(s) or any third parties may not reproduce or pass on this document, directly or indirectly, to any other person in whole or in part, for any other purpose than stated herein, without our prior approval. 2 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 11 1.1. Integrated System Plan ......................................................................................................... 11 1.2. Why has a rule change been proposed? ........................................................................... 13 1.3. Key issues in this context ...................................................................................................... 15 2. IS THERE A FINANCEABILITY PROBLEM? ..................................................................................... 16 2.1. The TNSPs’ analysis .............................................................................................................. 16 2.2. Our analysis ............................................................................................................................ 20 2.3. Interpretation of results ......................................................................................................... 34 3. ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES ..................................................................................................... 37 3.1. Options considered by the rule change proponents ........................................................ 37 3.2. Potential responses by TNSPs ............................................................................................. 37 3.3. Regulatory responses under current rules ........................................................................ 49 3.4. Approaches outside the existing regulatory framework .................................................. 52 3.5. Conclusions on alternatives ................................................................................................. 57 4. IMPACT OF THE RULE CHANGE .................................................................................................. 58 4.1. Substantial change in the regulatory framework .............................................................. 58 4.2. Interaction with regulatory framework ................................................................................ 61 4.3. Consumers .............................................................................................................................. 63 4.4. Investors .................................................................................................................................. 65 5. OVERALL ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................... 66 CREDIT RATINGS .................................................................................................... 69 MODELLING APPROACH AND ASSUMPTIONS .............................................................. 70 MODELLING RESULTS ............................................................................................. 76 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CEPA has been engaged by the Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) to provide advice on the financeability of Integrated System Plan (ISP) projects. The AEMC has sought this advice in the context of two rule change requests that have been put forward by TransGrid and ElectraNet, the Transmission Network Service Providers (TNSPs) for New South Wales (NSW) and South Australia (SA) respectively. Both TNSPs are developing plans for significant investments in new transmission infrastructure that has been identified in the Australian Energy Market Operator’s (AEMO) Integrated System Plan (ISP), as illustrated in the figure below. The TNSPs argue that, due to certain aspects of the current regulatory framework, the ISP projects will not be financeable. Figure E.1: 2020 ISP - Cumulative investment profile, all ISP projects ($real 2018-19) $20b $16b $12b $8b $4b $0b Actionable Actionable with decision rule Future Source: AEMO, 2020 ISP, Table 14. This figure reflects central estimates of project costs. Where investment timing is uncertain, we have applied the lower temporal bound of the provided range. Why has a rule change been proposed? TransGrid and ElectraNet claim that a ‘benchmark efficient entity’, with 60% notional gearing, would not be able to finance the ISP projects at the cost of capital allowed by the Australian Energy Regulator (AER). The TNSPs argue that this is due to two particular elements of the regulatory framework, namely that: • Remuneration for inflation is achieved (in effect) by providing a real return on a regulatory asset base (RAB) that is indexed to inflation;1 ——————————————————————————————————————————————————— 1 In practice, the AER achieves this outcome through the application of a nominal rate of return to an inflation-indexed RAB. A deduction is then made to the regulatory depreciation allowance, to remove the expected level of inflation that is reflected in the nominal rate of return. This adjustment is to avoid double counting the allowance for inflation. This approach results in the same outcome as a real rate of return applied to an indexed RAB (notwithstanding the question of how to correctly estimate the real rate of return, which depends on the assumed level of expected inflation). 4 • Remuneration for depreciation from the point when new assets are commissioned, rather than when capital expenditure is incurred (i.e., on a ‘capex commissioned’ rather than ‘capex incurred’ basis). According to the analysis put forward by the TNSPs, these features of the regulatory framework mean that a notional business, undertaking an ISP investment profile at 60% gearing and the cost of capital determined by the AER, would not have financial performance consistent with the notional BBB+/Baa1 rating.2 The TNSPs argue that, as a result a financeability problem for the notional company arises because either: • the cost of debt allowance is not high enough to reflect a benchmark efficient entity’s actual cost of debt, because the notional company’s credit rating would be lower than BBB+/Baa1; or • if the notional TNSP reduced its gearing (i.e. increased the proportion of equity funding) to maintain the target credit rating, the AER’s rate of return would not provide sufficient compensation to equity, as it is based on the notional capital structure. The TNSPs conclude that due to this perceived inconsistency in the assumed financing arrangements of the notional entity, there is a barrier to service providers recovering their efficient cost of capital, as is required under the Revenue and Pricing Principles set out in the National Electricity Law (NEL). Therefore, the companies argue that the ISP projects are not financeable under the current arrangements. To remedy this issue, the TNSPs have requested a participant derogation, that would bring forward revenue recovery for their actionable ISP projects through two changes to the current arrangements: • Remove indexation of the RAB for their actionable ISP projects. This would require the application of a nominal WACC to an unindexed RAB. • Require that depreciation be calculated on an ‘as capex incurred’ basis for their actionable ISP projects, rather than on an ‘as capex commissioned’ basis. The TNSPs claim that these changes will
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Project Energyconnect Review of Economic Assessment
    Project EnergyConnect Review of economic assessment 31 March 2021 Project EnergyConnect Review of economic assessment Copyright and Disclaimer Copyright in this material is owned by or licensed to ElectraNet. Permission to publish, modify, commercialise, or alter this material must be sought directly from ElectraNet. Reasonable endeavours have been used to ensure that the information contained in this report is accurate at the time of writing. However, ElectraNet gives no warranty and accepts no liability for any loss or damage incurred in reliance on this information. Revision Record Date Version Description Author Checked By Approved By 31 Mar 2021 1.0 For submission to the Brad Harrison Simon Appleby Rainer Korte AER and publication Hugo Klingenberg Page 1 of 12 Project EnergyConnect Review of economic assessment Project EnergyConnect material change in circumstances assessment Executive Summary On 14 September 2020, ElectraNet submitted an updated economic cost benefit analysis for Project EnergyConnect (PEC) to the AER for approval. The AER confirmed on 28 September 2020 that: “…the AER considers that the updated cost benefit analysis provides a not unreasonable basis for ElectraNet’s opinion that PEC remains the preferred option. We expect both ElectraNet and TransGrid to submit full and complete contingent project applications for PEC as soon as possible.” On 29 September 2020, the ElectraNet Board approved submission of a contingent project application (CPA) based on the AER’s confirmation and the CPA was submitted to the AER on 30 September 2020. This note reviews several subsequently announced policies and other changes in the National Electricity Market (NEM) and considers the impact that these could have on the benefits of PEC.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Climate Policy 2020
    Australia’s climate policy A de facto net zero target | August 2020 Norton Rose Fulbright is at the forefront of regulatory and market developments, providing advisory services on business risk and opportunities in relation to emissions regulation, carbon markets, offsets projects, clean energy, climate finance, sustainable development or resource scarcity. We bring a global perspective to the international patchwork of emerging policy and regulation, as well as trends in climate risk and climate change litigation. When you need help transitioning to a zero-carbon economy, we’re there. Australia’s climate policy The emerging patchwork | July 2020 Contents Introduction 04 State and Territory snapshot 05 Australian Capital Territory 06 New South Wales 08 Northern Territory 12 Queensland 16 South Australia 18 Tasmania 21 Victoria 23 Western Australia 26 Global Resources 29 Contacts 30 03 Australia’s climate policy The emerging patchwork | July 2020 Introduction This year, Australia experienced horrific bushfires, described In March 2020, the Climate Change Authority released a as the most “evident and deeply traumatic experience of the report making 35 recommendations, directed primarily to huge impacts of climate change” by Christiana Figueres, the the Federal Government, to assist with creating the policy Former Executive Secretary of The United Nations Framework settings necessary to meet our commitments under the Paris Convention On Climate Change.1 Also this year, the 2015 Agreement. Our update on that report can be found here Paris Agreement, which Ms Figueres helped to deliver, invites update. governments to set and communicate their long-term 2050 goals, and shorter term targets up to 2030 to decarbonise their As the business and financial community would attest to, economies.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Edition Virtual Events Update
    A weekly analysis updating you on the latest developments in the infrastructure sector. View the full report in your browser. Follow us on In this edition Virtual Events Update Registrations of Interest called for Renewable Energy Zone in Central-West NSW Productivity Commission kicks off second inquiry into National Water Reform NSW and Victorian governments continue fast-tracking planning approvals NSW Minister for Customer Service provides an exclusive briefing Industry News Appointments Virtual Policy Taskforces and Events Virtual Events Update This week, Infrastructure Partnerships Australia refreshed its virtual events program to focus on quality, over quantity and delivering you the best events, with the right speakers, at the right time. As part of the refresh, the weekly webinar slot on Thursday mornings will now move to a more dynamic model to provide the best and most timely content. Over the coming weeks you’ll see a range of sector leaders on our events platform, including Gladys Berejiklian, Premier of New South Wales, Ben Wyatt MP, Treasurer of Western Australia, and Tim Reardon, Secretary, NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, among others. That means you can be confident an invite to an Infrastructure Partnerships Australia virtual event will be worth making time for. We led the delivery of live and interactive virtual events and we’ll continue to innovate and evolve our service offering to keep you connected with the sector through the COVID-19 crisis and beyond. BACK TO TOP ENERGY Registrations of Interest called for Renewable Energy Zone in Central-West NSW The NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) has requested Registrations of Interest (ROIs) for the state’s first pilot Renewable Energy Zone (REZ) in the Central- West region.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Update Week Ending 5 June 2020
    Project Update Week ending 5 June 2020 Jemena calls for renewable gas certification to unlock Australia’s bioenergy potential 29 May Leading energy infrastructure company, “In addition, we also have the capacity to Jemena, has called for a national approach to unlock our bioenergy sector. Well established green accreditation for renewable gases, such in Europe, bioenergy is a proven ‘here and as biomethane and hydrogen, as part of its now’ fuel source and can help Australia submission to the Australian Renewable address the energy trilemma of affordability, Energy Agency (ARENA) Bioenergy Roadmap reliability and sustainability. today. “Renewable gases have a huge role to play in A certification system would enable lowering emissions in sectors such as heavy customers to purchase verified and accredited transport, manufacturing and our gas zero emission gas as is currently the case for networks.” renewable electricity. Time to unlock Australia’s bioenergy potential Jemena Executive General Manager, Gas Bioenergy is derived from plants, animals, and Distribution, Dr Jennifer Purdie said as their by-products and residues such as Australia looks to recover from the economic agriculture, farming, human and forestry impacts of COVID-19, renewable gas could wastes and remains. Converted into unlock regional jobs, business growth, biomethane, it can provide reliable and enhance energy security, and be injected into responsive carbon neutral energy for homes the network with no impact to customer and businesses. appliances. According to Bioenergy Australia, the total “Australia has the capacity to be a world contribution of the biofuels industry to the US leader in zero emission gas. Several green economy in 2016 was $459 billion, employing hydrogen gas trials have commenced for 4.65 million direct and indirect workers.
    [Show full text]
  • 9/06/2021 Dr Kerry Schott AO Chair, Energy Security Board Lodged by Email: [email protected] Dear Dr Schott
    ABN 70 250 995 390 180 Thomas Street, Sydney PO Box A1000 Sydney South NSW 1235 Australia T (02) 9284 3000 F (02) 9284 3456 9/06/2021 Dr Kerry Schott AO Chair, Energy Security Board Lodged by email: [email protected] Dear Dr Schott, Submission to the Energy Security Board’s post 2025 market design options paper We welcome the opportunity to respond to the Energy Security Board’s (ESB) post 2025 market design options paper. Australia is in the midst of an energy transition and the energy system is evolving at a rapid pace. TransGrid’s responsibility during this transition and beyond is to invest in, operate and manage our transmission network safely, securely and efficiently in the long-term interests of consumers. To this end, our Board has very recently made a Final Investment Decision to proceed with the construction of Project EnergyConnect (PEC), a high voltage interconnector between New South Wales and South Australia. We strongly support the work of the ESB to ensure that the National Electricity Market (NEM) design is fit for purpose and provides for a reliable and affordable supply of electricity to consumers. Our view is that it is essential that the post 2025 market design provides consumers with reliable and secure power at lower cost through: Ensuring that a centralised transmission network continues to be the backbone of the energy system - to enable efficiently located, large scale storage and renewable generation in the NEM. The connection of large scale renewable energy zones (REZs) to the grid as well as greater interconnection between the NEM regions will deliver this.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Transition in Australia
    ENERGY TRANSITION IN AUSTRALIA FLANDERS INVESTMENT & TRADE MARKET SURVEY Market Study /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ENERGY TRANSITION IN AUSTRALIA State of Play 2020 //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Flanders Investment & Trade Autstralia Pty Ltd 103/838 Collins Street Docklands VIC 3008 Australia T. +61 3 96 14 09 80 E. [email protected] www.flandersinvestmentandtrade.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FOREWORD .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 COVID-19 impact 5 2. AUSTRALIAN MACRO-FACTOR ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................... 6 DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS 6 ECONOMIC FACTORS 7 3. ENERGY MARKET (GENERAL STATISTICS - SNAPSHOT) .............................................................................. 8 ENERGY GENERATION 8 ENERGY CONSUMPTION 8 ENERGY COSTS 9 4. ENERGY DISTRIBUTION ................................................................................................................................................ 10 ENERGY NETWORKS 10 ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION 11 ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION 12 ELECTRICITY (AND GAS) RETAILING 13 4.4.1 Electricity retailing 13 4.4.2 Gas Retailing
    [Show full text]
  • Project Energyconnect: Updated Cost Benefit Analysis
    PROJECT ENERGYCONNECT Updated Cost Benefit Analysis 30 September 2020 Project EnergyConnect: Updated Cost Benefit Analysis Copyright and Disclaimer Copyright in this material is owned by or licensed to ElectraNet. Permission to publish, modify, commercialise or alter this material must be sought directly from ElectraNet. Reasonable endeavours have been used to ensure that the information contained in this report is accurate at the time of writing. However, ElectraNet gives no warranty and accepts no liability for any loss or damage incurred in reliance on this information. Revision Record Date Version Description Author Checked By Approved By 9 Sep 2020 Final Final draft for AER review Brad Harrison Hugo Klingenberg Rainer Korte Draft Simon Appleby 30 Sep 2020 Final Final for publication Brad Harrison Simon Appleby Rainer Korte Page 2 of 35 Project EnergyConnect: Updated Cost Benefit Analysis Executive Summary Project EnergyConnect (PEC) is the proposed new 330 kV electricity interconnector between Robertstown in South Australia and Wagga Wagga in New South Wales that also includes a short 220 kV line from Buronga in New South Wales and Red Cliffs in northwest Victoria. ElectraNet completed the Regulatory Investment Test for Transmission (RIT-T) with the release of a Project Assessment Conclusion Report (PACR) on 13 February 2019, which concluded that Project EnergyConnect was the preferred option that satisfied the requirements of the RIT-T. On 24 January 2020 the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) issued a formal determination that found that ElectraNet had correctly identified Project EnergyConnect as the preferred option. The National Electricity Rules (NER) require ElectraNet to consider whether, in its reasonable opinion, there has been a “material change in circumstances” that might lead to a change in the preferred option and thereby potentially require reapplication of the RIT-T.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Energy Australia Report 2021
    CLEAN ENERGY AUSTRALIA REPORT 2021 AUSTRALIA CLEAN ENERGY CLEAN ENERGY AUSTRALIA REPORT 2021 CONTENTS 4 Introduction 6 2020 snapshot 12 Jobs and investment in renewable energy by state 16 Industry outlook: small-scale renewable energy 20 Industry outlook: large-scale renewable energy 22 Federal politics 24 State policies 26 Australian Capital Territory 28 New South Wales 30 Northern Territory 32 Queensland 34 South Australia 36 Tasmania 38 Victoria 40 Western Australia 42 Employment 46 Renewables for business 50 International update 52 Electricity prices 54 Transmission 56 Energy reliability 58 Technology profiles 60 Battery storage 64 Bioenergy 66 Hydro and pumped hydro 68 Hydrogen 70 Solar: Small-scale systems up to 100 kW 78 Solar: Medium-scale systems between 100 kW and 5 MW 80 Solar: Large-scale systems larger than 5 MW 84 Wind Cover image: Wind turbine blade installation, Collector Wind Farm, New South Wales INTRODUCTION Kane Thornton Chief Executive, Clean Energy Council Australia’s clean energy came from clean energy sources, territories’ progressive energy policies transition accelerated with wind and rooftop solar leading only served to highlight the ongoing again in 2020 as wind the way. This represents a massive failures at the federal level, where transformation that makes Australia’s arguments about government support and rooftop solar set new electricity system cheaper, more for gas and coal overshadowed some records, battery storage reliable and, most importantly, cleaner. genuinely positive developments. came of age, and the But the best news is that the shift is These included the continued showing no sign of slowing down. hydrogen sector continued growth of clean energy jobs, with the its rapid development.
    [Show full text]
  • FOR the FUTURE Spark Infrastructure’S 2020 Annual Report Describes How We Have Created Value Over the Year Through Our Investments in Essential Energy Infrastructure
    ANNUAL REPORT 2020 INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE FUTURE Spark Infrastructure’s 2020 Annual Report describes how we have created value over the year through our investments in essential energy infrastructure. As a long-term investor, we aim to generate sustainable returns for Securityholders while delivering positive outcomes for our customers, our people, and the communities where we operate. CONTENTS Our 2020 Annual Report describes our performance according to key stakeholder outcomes. It includes our Directors’ Report and Financial Report. Securityholders Customers Our people, Innovation and Environment p16 and community health and safety technology p36 p24 p28 p32 Spark Infrastructure at a glance 2 Governance 40 Chair’s message 6 Board of Directors 42 Managing Director’s message 8 Management team 43 How we create value 10 Annual Financial Report Performance outcomes (including Directors’ report) 44 Creating value for Securityholders 16 Additional ASX disclosures 124 Partnering with customers and community 24 Glossary of terms 126 Supporting our people 28 Contact information 127 Leading through innovation and technology 32 Five-year performance summary 128 Acting on environmental risks and opportunities 36 AGM DETAILS 2020 REPORTING SUITE Annual General Meeting ANNUAL REPORT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT 11:30am, Thursday, 27 May 2021 2020 2020 INFRASTRUCTURE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE FUTURE FOR THE FUTURE Further details about the AGM can SUSTAINABILITY DATA REPORT 2020INFRASTRUCTURE be found on Spark’s website at FOR THE FUTURE https://www.sparkinfrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • 24 July 2020 Dear Stakeholders, Project Energyconnect Update
    24 July 2020 Dear Stakeholders, Project EnergyConnect Update Project EnergyConnect (PEC) is the proposed, new, 330-kV electricity interconnector between Robertstown, in South Australia, and Wagga Wagga, in New South Wales, that also includes a short 220-kV spur from Buronga, in New South Wales, to Red Cliffs in northwest Victoria. Background In 2016, ElectraNet began exploring options to reduce the cost of providing secure and reliable electricity, enhance power system security in South Australia, and facilitate the long-term transition of the energy sector across the National Electricity Market (NEM) to low emission energy sources. In November 2016, we released a Project Specification Consultation Report (PSCR) that explored the technical and economic feasibility of a new interconnector between South Australia and the eastern states as well as other non-network solution options, through the SA Energy Transformation Regulatory Investment Test for Transmission (RIT-T). The RIT-T is the economic cost benefit test that is overseen by the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) and applies to all major network investments in the NEM. In June 2018, a Project Assessment Draft Report (PADR) was released identifying that the construction of a new, high-capacity interconnector between South Australia and New South Wales would deliver substantial net benefits to customers. In February 2019, following extensive consultation with stakeholders we released a Project Assessment Conclusions Report (PACR) as the final step in the RIT-T process. The RIT-T PACR estimated the cost of the project to be $1.53 billion with a completion date of 2022 to 2024. To deliver the project, ElectraNet is partnering with TransGrid, the manager and operator of the high voltage electricity transmission network in NSW.
    [Show full text]
  • EIS Document Information EIS Document Information
    EIS Volume 1 EIS Document Information EIS Document Information Contents Acknowledgements ...........................................................................................................1 Disclaimer..........................................................................................................................2 EIS Project Team ................................................................................................................3 Abbreviations and Acronyms used in the EIS ......................................................................5 Glossary of Terms used in the EIS ..................................................................................... 11 Definition of Study Areas discussed in the EIS .................................................................. 13 Project EnergyConnect Environmental Impact Statement i EIS Document Information Acknowledgements EletraNet acknowledges all Traditional Owners of the land upon which Project EnergyConnect will be constructed and celebrates their enduring connections to Country, knowledge and stories. We pay our respects to their Elders and Ancestors and recognise the deep and ongoing feelings of relationship and attachment they hold for their lands. ElectraNet places great value on our relationships with all stakeholders and seeks to work in partnership with them, to develop the Project in a manner that generates the maximum benefit for both local communities and the broader South Australian community. ElectraNet has appreciated the cooperation of members
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Energy Australia 2020
    CLEAN ENERGY AUSTRALIA CLEAN ENERGY AUSTRALIA REPORT 2020 AUSTRALIA CLEAN ENERGY REPORT 2020 CONTENTS 4 Introduction 6 2019 snapshot 12 Jobs and investment in renewable energy by state 15 Project tracker 16 Renewable Energy Target a reminder of what good policy looks like 18 Industry outlook: small-scale renewable energy 22 Industry outlook: large-scale renewable energy 24 State policies 26 Australian Capital Territory 28 New South Wales 30 Northern Territory 32 Queensland 34 South Australia 36 Tasmania 38 Victoria 40 Western Australia 42 Employment 44 Renewables for business 48 International update 50 Electricity prices 52 Transmission 54 Energy reliability 56 Technology profiles 58 Battery storage 60 Hydro and pumped hydro 62 Hydrogen 64 Solar: Household and commercial systems up to 100 kW 72 Solar: Medium-scale systems between 100 kW and 5 MW 74 Solar: Large-scale systems larger than 5 MW 78 Wind Cover image: Lake Bonney Battery Energy Storage System, South Australia INTRODUCTION Kane Thornton Chief Executive, Clean Energy Council Whether it was the More than 2.2 GW of new large-scale Despite the industry’s record-breaking achievement of the renewable generation capacity was year, the electricity grid and the lack of Renewable Energy Target, added to the grid in 2019 across 34 a long-term energy policy continue to projects, representing $4.3 billion in be a barrier to further growth for large- a record year for the investment and creating more than scale renewable energy investment. construction of wind and 4000 new jobs. Almost two-thirds of Grid congestion, erratic transmission solar or the emergence this new generation came from loss factors and system strength issues of the hydrogen industry, large-scale solar, while the wind sector caused considerable headaches for by any measure 2019 was had its best ever year in 2019 as 837 project developers in 2019 as the MW of new capacity was installed grid struggled to keep pace with the a remarkable year for transition to renewable energy.
    [Show full text]