DOCSLIB.ORG

GMA Newsletter Fall 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GMA Newsletter Fall 2019 Volume XV, Issue 2 Fall/Winter 2019 IN THIS ISSUE GMA TO ELECTED FFICIALS: GMA to Elected Officials O Grant’s Tomb Needs Help 1 GRANT’S TOMB NEEDS HELP West Point Grant Statue mid the debate over whether to keep de Blasio reporting on maintenance and Unveiled on Campus 1 A. Confederate monuments in public operational deficiencies at Grant’s Tomb Inaugural Anniversary places, the tomb of the commander who and urging remedial action, as well as the 3 150Years After Grant achieved victory over the Confederates— need to complete the Tomb and improve Became President and who as president laid the foundations the learning experience of visitors. Grant’s 2019 GMA Dinner for the federal government as protector of Tomb, officially if confusingly named the 3 civil rights—needs help. General Grant National Memorial in 1959, Highlights a New Edition On March 28, 2019, the Grant Monument is a national park, which explains why fed- of Grant’s Memoirs Association (GMA) submitted a letter to eral elected officials are responsible for GMA Website Revamped President Donald Trump, members of the site. But New York City owns the plaza 4 Thank You, Reingold Congress, and New York City Mayor Bill north of Grant’s Continued on page 2 Detroit House to Move After Long Campaign 5 197th Birthday Ceremony GRANT STATUE UNVEILED AT WEST POINT Notes Grant’s 6 ising 150 feet above come Robert E. Lee’s sec- Presidential Legacy Rthe Hudson River, the ond-in-command in the Death Anniversary Plain at the United States Army of Northern Virginia. 6 Military Academy at West In conjunction with the A Moving Tribute Point is a location rich in 150th anniversary of his 134 Years Later history, the site for mili- first presidential inaugu- Special Insert tary ceremonies and daily ration, a statue honoring Grant’s Tomb Needs Help parades by cadets. The Grant was unveiled dur- perimeter of the Plain is ing a ceremony on the home to statues of a Plain on April 25, 2019. number of famous West The statue, designed by Point graduates, includ- artist Paula Slater, depicts ing Generals Dwight D. Grant, the first to hold the Eisenhower, Douglas Mac- rank of full general in the Arthur, George S. Patton, U.S. Army, in uniform with Still Rick Photos and now Ulysses S. Grant. The new statue on the day the four stars he wore It was at West Point that of its unveiling starting in 1866. The cere- GRANT an entering cadet named mony featured speeches Newsletter Staff “Hiram Ulysses” Grant became known as by a number of dignitaries who praised Editor “Ulysses S.” Grant, the result of a clerical Grant’s lifetime of leadership and service Frank Scaturro error when his congressman nominated to our country. Several hundred people Associate Editor Lucia McCreery him to attend the Academy. He didn’t were in attendance, including numerous Text exactly stand out in his class, but the skills officers and board members of the GMA. Andrew Hau that he learned and people he met would Lieutenant General Darryl Williams, Frank Scaturro prove to be critical during his remarkable Superintendent of the United States Mil- GRANT is published by the military career. Grant would get to know itary Academy, honored Grant with the Grant Monument Association. many of his future fellow soldiers and following words: “History has a habit of To submit a story idea, write to: adversaries during his years at West Point. calling out the right person at the right GMA Newsletter P.O. Box 1088, FDR Station Notably, James Longstreet, who graduat- time....Little did that young, unremark- New York, NY 10150-1088 ed one year before Grant, would serve as able cadet from Ohio know. what history [email protected] a groomsman at his wedding, according would one day demand of him, that one to some accounts, and later rose to be- day he would com- Continued on page 7 GRANT PAGE 2 Grant’s Tomb, continued from page 1 Tomb, which unclear whether the water damage this reflects is ongo- includes the memorial marking Grant’s temporary tomb ing, but repair is clearly necessary, as is adequate moni- site, the south plaza, and the overlook pavilion across the toring to ensure that any such damage be appropriately street that currently serves as a makeshift visitor center. repaired before the problem gets worse. Additional dis- These are integral parts of the site, even though they are coloration not believed to arise from water damage has on city rather than federal park land. They add a layer of long afflicted the marble floor surrounding the sarcopha- administrative confusion to existing problems: gi of Ulysses and Julia Grant. Security and maintenance deficiencies. In earlier de- As the NPS acknowledged more than two years ago in cades, through the early 1990s, vandalism and other its Project Management Information System (PMIS) pro- forms of desecration marred both the Tomb and the sur- posal describing the need for repairs, the broken, cracked rounding grounds, including the then-abandoned over- outdoor plaza surrounding the Tomb “has become so look pavilion. In response, the congressional delegation deteriorated it has become a safety hazard.” The granite at the time secured increased appropriations to refurbish that constitutes the Tomb’s steps and adjoining south the Tomb and the adjoining front plaza and to provide plaza, including the two stairways that lead to the side- security. The latter took the form of a contract between walks, also shows some wear. the National Park Service (NPS) and a private company to The black fence that encloses the temporary tomb site provide two security guards during the hours the monu- behind the monument, which contains a plaque in Chi- ment is closed. nese and English along with memorial trees planted at Amid the budget cuts of recent years, however, the the direction of Chinese Viceroy Li Hung Chang in 1897, is number of guards has been reduced to one. That is sim- weathered and bent in a distortion of its original shape. ply insufficient. Not only did the monument suffer a graf- The nearby grassy area requires landscaping to spruce fiti attack during the government shutdown early this up large areas that have become dirt. year, when security was absent, but another major attack The monument’s external nighttime lights were re- occurred even after the government reopened: On or paired in 2017, but the lighting is basically limited to the about the night of February 15, 2019, the back of the inside of the front portico, the lower part of the cupola, Tomb, near the northwestern corner of the monument, and whatever light from the city park lamps dimly illumi- was hit by more graffiti—an extensive attack involving nates the Tomb — a far cry from the lighting that illu- three different colors of paint. This time, a security guard minated the Tomb early in its history, and which today was present, but he was in front of the monument, and by lights up both the Washington Mall’s presidential memo- the time he detected what happened, it was too late. The rials and any number of less prominent presidential and apparent perpetrators of this vandalism, one male and Civil War monuments. one female, reportedly vaulted over the eastern retaining Insufficient visitor access and facilities. The overlook wall before the guard could catch them. The area in- pavilion across the street from the monument, which volved is simply too large to expect a single security once provided public restrooms before being abandoned guard to provide effective protection and enforcement. for over 40 years, reopened in 2011 to accommodate a Additionally, the site faces mounting maintenance ranger station, gift shop, public restrooms, and small problems, some more recent and others lingering for exhibit space. While that marked an improvement for a years. Within the Tomb, there is visible discoloration and site that had not been making use of this space or offer- peeling from water damage at the cupola/roof level, as ing any public restrooms, the combination of budget cuts well as in the ceilings above the two reliquary rooms. It is and the need to staff the property has seriously dimin- ished visitor access to Grant’s Tomb. During the 1990s, Graffiti attack when the site underwent a major refurbishment following in the top photo years of desecration and neglect, its open hours expand- occurred when ed from five to seven days a week. That remedied a defi- the government was shut down, ciency that kept the site closed two days every week, to the one below the consternation of many visitors who had traveled long distances. Carmen Delgado after it reopened In recent years, however, budget crunches led to the reversal of this improvement as the Tomb returned to a five-day schedule. While the rangers at the site are excel- lent, they are spread so thin that the Tomb proper has been closed for staggered hours even during its five open days because rangers are needed to staff the overlook pavilion as well. This marks a regression in visitor access to a point even worse than during the days of desecra- tion. The GMA has heard from a number of visitors who were chagrined at their inability to enter the monument. The Tomb proper should be open to the public seven days a week throughout the year and adequately staffed for the entirety of its open hours. Continued on page 4 GRANT PAGE 3 THE 150TH ANNIVERSARY OF GRANT’S INAUGURATION arch 3, 2019, witnessed a beautiful ceremony at MGrant’s Tomb in commemoration of the 150th an- niversary of President Grant’s inauguration.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cold Harbor Syndrome: Balanced, Compelling Study' Examines Grant's Overland Miscalculations
    Civil War Book Review Summer 2000 Article 8 Cold Harbor Syndrome: Balanced, Compelling Study' Examines Grant's Overland Miscalculations Gary W. Gallagher Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Gallagher, Gary W. (2000) "Cold Harbor Syndrome: Balanced, Compelling Study' Examines Grant's Overland Miscalculations," Civil War Book Review: Vol. 2 : Iss. 3 . Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr/vol2/iss3/8 Gallagher: Cold Harbor Syndrome: Balanced, Compelling Study' Examines Grant' Review COLD HARBOR SYNDROME 'Balanced, compelling study' examines Grant's Overland miscalculations Gallagher, Gary W. Summer 2000 Furgurson, Ernest B. Not War But Murder: Cold Harbor, 1864. Alfred A. Knopf, 2000-06-01. $27.50 ISBN 679455175 Ulysses S. Grant's offensive against Robert E. Lee's entrenched Army of Northern Virginia at Cold Harbor on June 3, 1864, summons powerful images. Northern assaults that day stand alongside Ambrose E. Burnside's attacks at Fredericksburg and John Bell Hood's at Franklin as examples of seemingly pointless slaughter of brave but doomed soldiers. Even casual students of the conflict know that Grant admitted as much in his memoirs when he confessed that he "always regretted that the last assault at Cold Harbor was ever made." Despite the well-known drama and gruesome butcher's bill on June 3, historians have devoted relatively little attention to Cold Harbor. It served as the last major battle of the Overland campaign, greatly influenced morale behind the lines in the North, and set the stage for Grant's brilliant crossing of the James River - all attributes that invite scrutiny.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulysses S. Grant and Julia Dent Grant Papers Finding Aid
    Mississippi State University Scholars Junction USGPL Finding Aids Ulysses S. Grant Presidential Library 12-1-2020 Ulysses S. Grant and Julia Dent Grant papers Finding Aid Ulysses S. Grant Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/usgpl-findingaids Recommended Citation Ulysses S. Grant and Julia Dent Grant papers, Ulysses S. Grant Presidential Library, Mississippi State University This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Ulysses S. Grant Presidential Library at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGPL Finding Aids by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ulysses S. Grant and Julia Dent Grant papers USGPL.USGJDG This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on December 01, 2020. Mississippi State University Libraries P.O. Box 5408 Mississippi State 39762 [email protected] URL: http://library.msstate.edu/specialcollections Ulysses S. Grant and Julia Dent Grant papers USGPL.USGJDG Table of Contents Summary Information ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical Note: Ulysses S. Grant ................................................................................................................. 3 Scope and Content Note ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Administrative
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One: the Campaign for Chattanooga, June to November 1863
    CHAPTER ONE: THE CAMPAIGN FOR CHATTANOOGA, JUNE TO NOVEMBER 1863 Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park commemorates and preserves the sites of important and bloody contests fought in the fall of 1863. A key prize in the fighting was Chattanooga, Tennessee, an important transportation hub and the gateway to Georgia and Alabama. In the Battle of Chickamauga (September 18-20, 1863), the Confederate Army of Tennessee soundly beat the Federal Army of the Cumberland and sent it in full retreat back to Chattanooga. After a brief siege, the reinforced Federals broke the Confeder- ate grip on the city in a series of engagements, known collectively as the Battles for Chatta- nooga. In action at Brown’s Ferry, Wauhatchie, and Lookout Mountain, Union forces eased the pressure on the city. Then, on November 25, 1863, Federal troops achieved an unex- pected breakthrough at Missionary Ridge just southeast of Chattanooga, forcing the Con- federates to fall back on Dalton, Georgia, and paving the way for General William T. Sherman’s advance into Georgia in the spring of 1864. These battles having been the sub- ject of exhaustive study, this context contains only the information needed to evaluate sur- viving historic structures in the park. Following the Battle of Stones River (December 31, 1862-January 2, 1863), the Federal Army of the Cumberland, commanded by Major General William S. Rosecrans, spent five and one-half months at Murfreesboro, Tennessee, reorganizing and resupplying in preparation for a further advance into Tennessee (Figure 2). General Braxton Bragg’s Confederate Army of Tennessee was concentrated in the Tullahoma, Tennessee, area.
    [Show full text]
  • GRANT | Education Guide 1 at the Time of His Death, Ulysses S
    GRANT | Education Guide 1 At the time of his death, Ulysses S. Grant was one of the most famous men in the world. He stood alongside leaders like George Washington and Abraham Lincoln in the pantheon of American heroes. But today, many of Grant’s contributions are largely forgotten. With a seamless blend of dramatic scenes, expert commentary and beautifully enhanced archival imagery, Grant is a three-part miniseries that uncovers the true legacy of the unlikely hero who led the nation during its greatest tests: the Civil War and Reconstruction. Executive produced by Pulitzer Prize-winning author and biographer Ron Chernow and Academy Award-winning actor Leonardo DiCaprio, Grant tells his story for a new generation of viewers. CURRICULUM LINKS: Grant would be useful for History, American History, Social Studies, Political Science and Government courses. This mini-series is rated TV-14V. Due to some violent scenes, we recommend that educators view the series before recommending it to students below 10th grade. Educators can use this guide as a resource and to develop their own lesson plans or activities best suited to their students and their specific educational benchmarks. GRANT | Education Guide 2 GENERAL DISCUSSION QUESTIONS: Below are some general questions students can discuss after they watch one or more episodes of Grant. Students may also want to answer these questions in essay format. 1. What do you think were Grant’s most important contributions, during the Civil War and as president? 2. What were the primary issues that led to the American Civil War? 3. If you had to describe Ulysses S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Talk with Bracelen Flood, Author of Grant's Final Victory Charles Bracelen Flood Eastern Kentucky University
    Volume 2 Living With Others / Crossroads Article 8 2018 A Talk with Bracelen Flood, Author of Grant's Final Victory Charles Bracelen Flood Eastern Kentucky University Follow this and additional works at: https://encompass.eku.edu/tcj Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, Education Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Flood, Charles Bracelen (2018) "A Talk with Bracelen Flood, Author of Grant's Final Victory," The Chautauqua Journal: Vol. 2 , Article 8. Available at: https://encompass.eku.edu/tcj/vol2/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in The hC autauqua Journal by an authorized editor of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Flood: Grant's Final Victory CHARLES BRACELEN FLOOD A TALK WITH BRACELEN FLOOD, AUTHOR OF GRANT’S FINAL VICTORY Ulysses S. Grant is best known for leading the Union to victory during the Civil War, and for his presidency. What led you to focus on the last year of Grant’s life rather than on his wartime service or years in office? I was fascinated by how little had been written about his last year. In a fourteen-month period, he first lost all his money in a Wall Street swindle. As he began to write his memoirs in an effort to make some money, he was diagnosed as having cancer of the mouth and throat—the result of many years of smoking cigars. Twenty years after he set new standards of military honor by his magnanimous treatment of Robert E.
    [Show full text]
  • Siege of Petersburg
    Seige Of Petersburg June 9th 1864 - March 25th 1865 Siege Of Petersburg Butler”s assault (June 9) While Lee and Grant faced each other after Cold Harbor, Benjamin Butler became aware that Confederate troops had been moving north to reinforce Lee, leaving the defenses of Petersburg in a vulnerable state. Sensitive to his failure in the Bermuda Hundred Campaign, Butler sought to achieve a success to vindicate his generalship. He wrote, "the capture of Petersburg lay near my heart." Petersburg was protected by multiple lines of fortifications, the outermost of which was known as the Dimmock Line, a line of earthworks 10 miles (16 km) long, east of the city. The 2,500 Confederates stretched thin along this defensive line were commanded by a former Virginia governor, Brig. Gen. Henry A. Wise. Butler”s plan was formulated on the afternoon of June 8, 1864, calling for three columns to cross the Appomattox and advance with 4,500 men. The first and second consisted of infantry from Maj. Gen. Quincy A. Gillmore”s X Corps and U.S. Colored Troops from Brig. Gen. Edward W. Hinks”s 3rd Division of XVIII Corps, which would attack the Dimmock Line east of the city. The third was 1,300 cavalrymen under Brig. Gen. August Kautz, who would sweep around Petersburg and strike it from the southeast. The troops moved out on the night of June 8, but made poor progress. Eventually the infantry crossed by 3:40 a.m. on June 9 and by 7 a.m., both Gillmore and Hinks had encountered the enemy, but stopped at their fronts.
    [Show full text]
  • Background: Appomattox
    Unit 3: Appomattox Classroom Resources Background: Appomattox During the Civil War, the Confederacy had its own constitution, its own president, and its own capital city in Richmond, Virginia. The Confederate government met there, and President Jefferson Davis lived in a mansion called the White House of the Confederacy. Three years into the war, Ulysses S. Grant led a massive campaign to capture this city, believing it would defeat the South for good. Grant chose not to attack the well-defended capital directly. Instead, he focused on Petersburg, about 20 miles to the south. Most of Richmond’s supplies came through this city. Beginning in the summer of 1864, Union forces lay siege to Petersburg, destroying highways, railroads, and bridges. Confederate forces under General Robert E. Lee defended Petersburg from a line of trenches, but they were badly outnumbered. The Confederate Congress debated whether to arm slaves to fight as soldiers, which would have increased the size of the Army dramatically, but the decision to do so came too late to affect the outcome of the war. In March 1865, General Lee proposed to Jefferson Davis that the Army abandon Petersburg, sacrifice Richmond, and escape to merge with General Joe Johnston’s 20,000 troops in North Carolina. Free of the need to defend the cities, the combined force could continue the war for as long as it took to win. This is just what Grant feared might happen as he continued the siege of Petersburg. On March 30 and 31, 1865, Federal forces tried repeatedly to destroy the last rail link from Petersburg to Richmond.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulysses S. Grant Born April 27, 1822 Point Pleasant, Ohio Died July 23, 1885 Mount Mcgregor, New York
    Civil War Bios- Vol. 1 10/7/03 4:17 PM Page 159 Ulysses S. Grant Born April 27, 1822 Point Pleasant, Ohio Died July 23, 1885 Mount McGregor, New York Union general who captured Vicksburg and defeated Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia, ending the Civil War Eighteenth president of the United States lysses S. Grant was one of the greatest—and most un- “I have but one Ulikely—military commanders in American history. Prior sentiment now. We have to the Civil War, he struggled to provide for his family, first a government and laws as a soldier and then as a businessman. But when the war and a flag and they must began, he quickly showed that he was one of the North’s be sustained. There are top military leaders. During the first two years of the con- flict, his victories at Fort Donelson, Vicksburg, and Chat- but two parties now: tanooga helped the Union seize control of the Confedera- traitors and patriots.” cy’s western states. Grant then moved to the war’s eastern theater (a large geographic area in which military operations take place), where he was given command of all the Union armies. Begin- ning in the spring of 1864, he brought the full power of the Union forces against the South. Grant’s merciless use of sus- tained pressure against the weary armies and citizens of the Confederacy eventually forced the South to surrender in 1865. Four years later, Grant became president of the United States. But the North’s greatest military hero never really learned how to be a good political leader, and his two terms Ulysses S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vicksburg Campaign: March 29 May 18, 1863
    Civil War Book Review Winter 2014 Article 24 The Vicksburg Campaign: March 29 May 18, 1863 Jeff T. Giambrone Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Giambrone, Jeff T. (2014) "The Vicksburg Campaign: March 29 May 18, 1863," Civil War Book Review: Vol. 16 : Iss. 1 . DOI: 10.31390/cwbr.16.1.25 Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr/vol16/iss1/24 Giambrone: The Vicksburg Campaign: March 29 May 18, 1863 Review Giambrone, Jeff T. Winter 2014 Woodworth, Steven E. and Grear, Charles. The Vicksburg Campaign: March 29 – May 18, 1863. Southern Illinois University Press, $32.50 ISBN 9780809332694 An Essay Collection Providing a New Look at a New Campaign In The Vicksburg Campaign: March 29 – May 18, 1863, editors Steven E. Woodworth and Charles D. Grear have assembled a book made up of articles from a number of noted historians about one of the most complex and interesting operations of the Civil War: General Ulysses S. Grant’s 1863 campaign against Fortress Vicksburg. The articles in this book deal with the events prior to the siege of Vicksburg, the importance of which is spelled out clearly in the introduction: It lasted only seven and a half weeks, but the maneuver segment of the Vicksburg Campaign reversed the verdict of the previous six months’ operations on the Mississippi, all but sealed the doom of the Gibraltar of the Confederacy and its defending army, secured the reputation of Ulysses S. Grant as one of history’s greatest generals, and paved the way to eventual Confederate defeat (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Noble E. Dawson Papersusgpl.NED
    Noble E. Dawson papersUSGPL.NED This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on October 06, 2020. Mississippi State University Libraries P.O. Box 5408 Mississippi State 39762 [email protected] URL: http://library.msstate.edu/specialcollections Noble E. Dawson papersUSGPL.NED Table of Contents Summary Information ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical Note ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Scope and Content Note ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................... 4 Controlled Access Headings ............................................................................................................................... 4 Collection Inventory ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Series 1: Correspondence ................................................................................................................................. 5 Series 2: Transcriptions ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1974/10/11 HR16032 Composition of Penny and Eisenhower College Grants” of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 9, folder “1974/10/11 HR16032 Composition of Penny and Eisenhower College Grants” of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Exact duplicates within this folder were not digitized. Digitized from Box 9 of the White House Records Office Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE ACTION WASHINGTON Last Day - October 12 October 9, 1974 MEMORANDUM FOR: THE PRE~ENT • FROM: KEN co~- SUBJECT: Enrolled Bill H.R. 16032 Changing the Composition of the Penny and Authorizing Grants to Eisenhower College Attached for your consideration is House bill, H. R. 16032 which authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to alter the composition of the one-cent piece and also, in the form of a rider, authorizes additional grants to Eisenhower College , Seneca Falls , New York , and grants to the Samuel Rayburn Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Educator's Guide
    Educator’s Guide Common Core-Aligned for New York State Middle School (adaptable for elementary and high school students) 1 Table of Contents Visiting General Grant National Memorial ......................................................................... 3 General Grant National Memorial……………………………………………………………....................4-5 President Grant’s biography ............................................................................................ 6-7 How to use this guide ......................................................................................................... 8 Unit Overview ..................................................................................................................... 8 Big Ideas/Enduring Understandings.………………………………………………………………………………9 Essential Questions………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 9 Focus Questions …………………………………………………………………………………………………………...9 Instructional Supports (See Appendix) …………………………………………………………………………..9 Final Performance Task …………………………………………………………………………………………..10-11 Rubric For Final Performance Task …………………………………………………………………….…..12-15 Lesson Plans ...................................................................................................... 16-108 Lesson Plan 1 ................................................................................................................ 17-22 Lesson Plan 2 .................................................................................................................................................... 23-28 Lesson Plan 3 ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]