Echols and Associates Divorce Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Echols and Associates Divorce Guide GUIDE (405) 691-2648 www.echolslawfirm.com 9925 S. Pennsylvania Ave., Suite 100, Oklahoma City, OK 73159 405-691-2648 www.echolslawfi rm.com Oklahoma’s Top Rated Matrimonial Lawyers stablished in 1979, Echols & Associates is David W. Echols is a fellow in the American Academy primarily engaged in contested and complex of Matrimonial Lawyers. Jonathan Echols, named for Efamily law litigation. the third year as a Rising Star by SuperLawyers; Amy Howe, recognized for the third year by the National Our attorneys have dedicated themselves to help- Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40, National Academy ing clients find their future, while honoring their past, of Family Law Attorneys Top 10 Under 40 for 2015 through compassionate, knowledgeable and experi- and 2016, and American Institute 10 Best Under enced representation in the Family Courts of Oklahoma. 40 for 2015 and 2016; Ashley Rahill, Recipient of Oklahoma Bar Association President’s Award, 2012 The firm has received numerous accolades including and Leadership Academy 2014; and Kyle Endicott, being recognized for many years by the Bar Register of who is the newest member of the firm, continue to Preeminent Lawyers rated by Martindale-Hubbell for provide our clients with knowledgeable and compas- legal ability and highest professional standards. sionate representation. In Memoriam, Judge M. Eileen Echols (March 16, 1951 – June 30, 2016) David W. Echols Jonathan D. Echols Amy L. Howe Ashley D. Rahill Kyle L. Endicott 9925 S. Pennsylvania, Suite 100, Oklahoma City, OK 73159 405-691-2648 www.echolslawfirm.com For most people, divorce is much more than a major legal process. It’s also a challenging time of transition that can negatively impact virtually every area of life: emotional, psychological, domestic, parental, financial, physical health, social, vocational, and more. This special Divorce Guide contains helpful articles, tips, and advice to assist you and your family through this transformational process. It will help empower you to build the satisfying new post- divorce life you desire – and deserve. 4 Understanding the Divorce Process A basic primer on how the divorce process works. contents 7 5 Ways to Financially Prepare for Divorce 24 Tips for Healthy Co-Parenting with a Toxic Ex Following these simple steps will ease the fi nancial shock Develop a healthy relationship post-divorce for the of divorce – and help your transition to post-divorce life. emotional and psychological well-being of your kids. 8 How to Choose a Divorce Lawyer 26 4 Questions Kids Will Ask About Your Divorce Here are the 17 questions you should ask to fi nd the right How to answer the most common questions and reassure lawyer to represent you. your children. 10 7 Ways to Stop Sabotaging Relationships 28 Documenting Your Financial Situation With insight and self-awareness, you can learn to create Collecting fi nancial information and creating a budget loving, long-term relationships in the future. will help you know where you stand. 12 7 Common Financial Divorce Mistakes to Avoid 30 5 Ways to Build Confidence After Divorce These mistakes can have devastating eff ects on your Your confi dence can take a nose-dive after divorce; here’s fi nancial well-being during and after divorce. how to get back on track. 14 Marital Property vs. Separate Property 32 7 Ways To Fight Depression and Thrive After Divorce How the courts typically defi ne separate property and When life hands you lemons, sprinkle sugar on them and marital property in divorce. enjoy a sweet lemonade. 16 Designing a Parenting Plan 34 Make Room for Spiritual Healing There are several important issues to consider as you Understanding your core values and spiritual beliefs could design your parenting plan. help you reorganize your life after divorce. 20 The Dangers of Social Media in Divorce The articles in this Divorce Guide are provided for general information and may Think twice before posting anything on social media not apply to your unique situation. These articles do not take the place of a lawyer, during and after divorce: the consequences could be dire. accountant, fi nancial planner, therapist, etc.; since laws and procedures vary by region, for professional advice, you must seek counsel from the appropriate professional in your area. The views presented in the articles are the authors’ own and do not necessarily 22 5 Tips for Maintaining an In-Law Relationship represent the views of this fi rm or of Divorce Marketing Group. This Guide is published by and Copyright © Divorce Marketing Group. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Any use Things you can do to help maintain a relationship with of materials from this Guide – including reproduction, modifi cation, or distribution – your in-laws during and after divorce. without prior written consent of Divorce Marketing Group is prohibited. Divorce Guide | 1 preparingfordivorce Understanding the Divorce Process Here’s a basic primer on how the divorce process typically works. By Diana Shepherd, Divorce Financial Professional ike snowflakes, no two divorces are identical: every marital break- Lup has its own unique legal, fi- nancial, and/or parenting issues, which require their own resolution strategies. However, every divorce undergoes the same general journey from initiation to closure. Whether you and your spouse make this journey slowly or quickly, expensively or inexpensively, stressfully or peacefully is up to you, but the desti- nation is always the same: from shared to separate lives. Here’s a basic primer of how the divorce process works in the United States and Canada. Bear in mind that you need to speak to a family lawyer to discover how the options vary in your divorce case takes six months or six A temporary order/agreement estab- state or province, as well as how the years from beginning to end, you have lishes quick decisions about the chil- details and circumstances of your situa- to keep food on the table and a roof over dren, property, bank accounts, support, tion may affect your process. your heads, among other things. During and other key issues during the separa- this temporary period before a divorce is tion period. For example, if one spouse Temporary Orders and Filing finalized, most people are able to reach moves out of the home and the other has Divorce Papers an agreement about how to pay for their no income, how will the latter feed the Although it may feel like it sometimes, expenses. If they can’t reach an agree- kids and pay the bills? One of the most life does not come to a halt while you’re ment, they might have to go to court to common temporary orders is for spousal negotiating your divorce. Whether your ask a judge to issue temporary orders. support. To obtain this order, you must 2 | Divorce Guide establish that one spouse needs the sup- If you and your spouse can’t reach an agreement, port and that the other spouse is able to pay it – which may require a Financial then your case goes to trial. Divorce trials Affidavit or Statement detailing both can take many months or even years, spouses’ living expenses and incomes. You should hire a divorce lawyer and they’re never pleasant. and/or mediator and financial advisor as soon as possible. You’ll set your tem- last five years; a recent pay slip; the can initiate this by filing a motion with porary order/agreement in a brief, rela- major assets and liabilities of both the court. A short hearing takes place in tively informal hearing before a judge, you and your spouse; budget work- which the lawyers representing you and so prepare a complete list of what you sheets; insurance policies; credit- your spouse present their cases before want to request. The items you can card statements; wills; and any the judge. In most cases, only the law- request include: temporary custody and credit or mortgage applications. yers are permitted to speak. However, if visitation arrangements; a restraining Unless you create a separation you are going the Do-It-Yourself (a.k.a. order (if there has been domestic vio- agreement, your divorce lawyer will use Pro Se) route, you’ll be able to represent lence); child or spousal support; and/or this as a starting point for the discovery yourself in this hearing. Once the judge who gets the car and house. process. Your lawyer needs as much spe- makes a decision on the matter, the regu- cific information about the marriage as lar process continues as before. Filing the Petition possible in order to work out the finan- Next, you or your spouse will file a cial and children’s issues fairly. Most of To Litigate or Negotiate? petition, application, or complaint for discovery involves financial matters, for You and your spouse must decide how divorce with your local family court. The which your lawyer needs specific, accu- to resolve your divorce. Will you fight person who files (“the plaintiff”) serves rate details. From the value of items you it out through adversarial litigation, or a summons upon the other spouse, stat- bought during the marriage to stocks, can you set aside personal feelings long ing that they want a divorce and what pensions, and revenue from a business, enough to negotiate outside of court? they are seeking in terms of property, you and your divorce professionals (e.g., Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) child custody, spousal and child support, lawyers, mediators, financial advisors, methods – such as arbitration, media- etc. The other spouse (“the defendant”) appraisers, etc.) may have to retrieve tion, and Collaborative Divorce – have must answer the summons and, if they documentation of every dollar value – become popular means of resolving wish, can make their own claim.
Recommended publications
  • Framework for Considering the Best Interests of Unaccompanied Children May 2016
    Subcommittee on Best Interests of the Interagency Working Group on Unaccompanied and Separated Children PREPARED BY: with support from: FRAMEWORK FOR at the University of Chicago the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation CONSIDERING THE BEST INTERESTS and in collaboration with: OF UNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN MAY 2016 Subcommittee on Best Interests of the Interagency Working Group on Unaccompanied and Separated Children FRAMEWORK FOR CONSIDERING THE BEST INTERESTS OF UNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN MAY 2016 PREPARED BY: with support from: at the University of Chicago the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and in collaboration with: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The creation of this document, Framework for Considering the Best Interests of Unaccompa- nied Children, was made possible by the generous support of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the leadership of John Slocum and Tara Magner. This document represents the culmination of three years of work by the Subcommittee on Best Interests of the Interagency Working Group on Unaccompanied and Separated Children. It is intended to be a practical, step-by-step guide for considering the best interests of individual children within the confnes of existing law. This project was premised on collaboration between federal agencies and non-governmental organizations and would not have been possible without the stewardship of Professor Andrew Schoenholtz of the Georgetown University Law Center. Professor Schoenholtz moderated each of the Subcommittee meetings, lending a critical tone of
    [Show full text]
  • The Treatment of Statelessness Under International Law
    Briefing Ruma Mandal and Amanda Gray International Law Programme | October 2014 Out of the Shadows: The Treatment of Statelessness under International Law Summary • The UN estimates that at least 10 million people • International human rights law adds to the are stateless, including communities excluded protection of stateless persons and to the from citizenship for generations. safeguards against statelessness, but the law is not being sufficiently observed. Further efforts • Lacking a formal status, stateless persons are to improve understanding and compliance with among the most vulnerable and marginalized. the existing legal framework are necessary, not • Protracted disputes over the citizenship status new legal standards. of communities can lead to conflict and refugee • In the UK, controversy has arisen over movements. new powers to strip British citizens of their • Despite relatively low levels of participation, the nationality even where this risks statelessness. UN treaties concerning statelessness continue to play a significant role. Out of the Shadows: The Treatment of Statelessness under International Law Introduction one’s nationality.5 Subsequently, various prohibitions on discrimination in relation to nationality have emerged. The It is the worst possible thing to happen to a human being. It means right to a nationality encompasses change and retention of you are a non-entity, you don’t exist, you’re not provided for, you nationality as well as its acquisition.6 Importantly, there is count for nothing.1 no corresponding obligation on a state to grant nationality 7 That a person has a nationality is generally taken for or a right to receive a nationality of one’s choice.
    [Show full text]
  • No Child Should Be Stateless
    NO CHILD SHOULD BE STATELESS European Network on Statelessness Executive Summary 1 Introduction 2 1. Europe’s #StatelessKids 4 2. Children’s right to a nationality 6 3. Why are children still born stateless in Europe? 10 4. When do children of European parents face statelessness? 19 5. Dealing with complex cases: foundlings, adoption, surrogacy 22 6. Promoting birth registration, to prevent statelessness 25 Conclusion and recommendations 29 Annexes and endnotes 33 Acknowledgements 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Convention on the Rights of the Child, universally ratified by relevant cases, in order to avoid such scenarios as where a child is European countries, obliges governments to fulfil the right of every labelled as being of “unknown nationality” for a prolonged period child to acquire a nationality. Yet, childhood statelessness persists. of time. Improving the provision of information on applicable States are failing to take adequate steps to ensure that all children nationality procedures to those affected constitutes an important born within Europe’s borders or to European citizen parents complement to identifying stateless children, where the remedy acquire a nationality. For those affected, statelessness can mean is not automatic under the law (section 3 of the report). It is also lack of access to other rights and services, denied opportunities, crucial to resolve structural problems that have the effect of unfulfilled potential and a sense of never quite belonging. It brings inhibiting the enjoyment of nationality, in particular through the hardship and anguish to children and their parents alike. identification and elimination of barriers that restrict access to birth registration for vulnerable groups – especially those who face The European Network on Statelessness (ENS) is campaigning a significant risk of statelessness if left without official evidence of for an end to childhood statelessness in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Best Interests of the Child
    STATE STATUTES Current Through March 2016 WHAT’S INSIDE Determining the Best Best interests definition Interests of the Child Guiding principles of best interests Courts make a variety of decisions that affect determinations children, including placement and custody determinations, safety and permanency planning, Best interests factors and proceedings for termination of parental rights. Other considerations Whenever a court makes such a determination, it must weigh whether its decision will be in the “best Full-text excerpts of interests” of the child. State laws All States, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, To find statute and the U.S. Virgin Islands have statutes requiring information for a that the child’s best interests be considered whenever particular State, go to specified types of decisions are made regarding a child’s custody, placement, or other critical life issues. https://www.childwelfare. gov/topics/systemwide/ laws-policies/state/. Children’s Bureau/ACYF/ACF/HHS 800.394.3366 | Email: [email protected] | https://www.childwelfare.gov Determining the Best Interests of the Child https://www.childwelfare.gov Best Interests Definition Best Interests Factors Although there is no standard definition of “best Approximately 22 States and the District of Columbia list interests of the child,” the term generally refers to the in their statutes specific factors for courts to consider in deliberation that courts undertake when deciding what making determinations regarding the best interests of the type of services, actions, and orders will best serve a child.5 While the factors vary considerably from State to child as well as who is best suited to take care of a child.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for the Protection, Care and Assistance of Vulnerable Child Migrants
    GUIDANCE FOR THE PROTECTION, CARE AND ASSISTANCE OF VULNERABLE CHILD MIGRANTS PART 6 PART 6: GUIDANCE FOR THE PROTECTION, CARE AND ASSISTANCE OF VULNERABLE MIGRANT CHILDREN CONTENT INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................251 Objectives ............................................................................................................................................252 Structure ...............................................................................................................................................252 6.1 THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK CREATED BY THE BEST INTERESTS PRINCIPLE .............................................................................................................253 Summary: The legal framework created by the best interests principle ..253 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................253 The “best interests” principle defined ..............................................................................255 Identification and verification of unaccompanied or separated children ..256 Basic needs ........................................................................................................................................257 Safety, security and shelter .....................................................................................................258 Non-detention of migrant children
    [Show full text]
  • Best Interests of the Child – a Legislative Journey Still in Motion by Erin Bajackson*
    \\jciprod01\productn\M\MAT\25-2\MAT205.txt unknown Seq: 1 9-APR-13 7:14 Vol. 25, 2013 Best Interests of the Child 311 Best Interests of the Child – A Legislative Journey Still in Motion by Erin Bajackson* Little argument exists among scholars that the current model used in custody cases, the “best interests of the child” standard, has at least as many weaknesses as it does strengths. At best it can be described as a fact-driven process that most accurately protects a child’s physical, psychological, and emo- tional needs.1 At worst it has been deemed an egocentric, utilita- rian product of the state’s design to make children productive members of society rather than burdens upon it later in life.2 The truth most likely lies somewhere in the vast distance between the two extremes—a different spot on the spectrum for each state that relies largely upon its own judicial interpretation of a guide- line exceedingly vague in nature. What may be more largely agreed upon is that this guideline, outlined in section 402 of the Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act (hereinafter “the Act” or “UMDA”) to give children a voice in the custody process, has sparked a firestorm of legislation calling into question just who should be the focus of the standard. At issue is whose rights – those of the children or the parents – should be of paramount consideration. Does the benefit of a meaningful and lasting relationship with both parents in most cases substantiate a presumption of joint custody? * American Academy of Matrimonial Law Journal Staff Member, J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • National Guidelines for Barnahus in Slovenia
    National Guidelines arnahus (Children’s House) is a leading model in Europe for Barnahus in Slovenia for a coordinated child-friendly, interagency and multi- B disciplinary state response towards child sexual abuse. The purpose of Barnahus is to coordinate and facilitate parallel criminal and child welfare investigations and to provide support services for child victims and witnesses of sexual abuse. This publication contains a series of guiding principles for authorities and professionals to support the establishment and sustainable operation of Barnahus in Slovenia. The guidelines were developed in the framework of the joint European Union-Council of Europe project “Barnahus/Children’s House” (2018) implemented in close collaboration with the Ministry of Justice of Slovenia. www.coe.int/children PREMS 104918 ENG The Council of Europe is the continent’s leading human rights organisation. It comprises 47 member Building a Europe states, 28 of which are members of the European for and with children Union. The Parliamentary Assembly, consisting of www.coe.int representatives from the 47 national parliaments, provides a forum for debate and proposals on Europe’s social and political issues. Many Council of Europe conventions originate from the Assembly, including the European Convention on Human Rights. National Guidelines for Barnahus in Slovenia All rights reserved. All requests concerning the reproduction or translation of all or part of this document should be addressed to the Directorate of Communication (F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex or [email protected]). Cover and lay-out: Documents and Publications Production Department (SDPD), Council of Europe This publication has not been copy-edited by the SDPD Editorial Unit to correct typographical and grammatical errors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Assessment and Determination of the Best Interests of the Child in the Spanish Criminal, Administrative and Civil Courts
    Alternative report presented to the attention of the Committee on the Rights of the Children in its 77 session: THE ASSESSMENT AND DETERMINATION OF THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD IN THE SPANISH CRIMINAL, ADMINISTRATIVE AND CIVIL COURTS Spain Convention on the rights of the child (article 3, paragraph 1) Report presented by the University CEU Cardenal Herrera: Researchers: Susana Sanz-Caballero (dir.), Mar Molina Navarro, Elena Juaristi Besalduch, Beatriz Hermida Bellot and Elena Goñi Huarte Contact: [email protected] Facultad de Derecho, Empresa y Ciencias Políticas Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera Luis Vives 1 46115 Alfara del Patriarca (Spain) Report in Spanish: La evaluación y determinación del interés superior del niño en la jurisprudencia española de carácter penal, administrativa y civil February 16th. 2017 1 INDEX INTRODUCTION THE ASSESSMENT AND DETERMINATION OF THE BEST INTERESTS OF CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW CURRENT SITUATION PROGRESS RECOMMENDATIONS THE ASSESSMENT AND DETERMINATION OF THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD IN THE CASE LAW OF THE SUPREME COURT’S CHAMBER FOR CONTENTIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS CURRENT SITUATION PROGRESS RECOMMENDATIONS THE ASSESSMENT AND DETERMINATION OF THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD IN SURROGACY IN SPAIN CURRENT SITUATION PROGRESS RECOMMENDATIONS ASSESSMENT AND DETERMINATION OF THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD IN JOINT CUSTODY CASES CURRENT SITUATION PROGRESS RECOMMENDATIONS 2 INTRODUCTION SUSANA SANZ-CABALLERO Professor of Public International Law, CEU UCH This report is one of the results of the research project “El interés superior del niño como derecho, principio y regla de procedimiento: la adaptación del derecho español y europeo: análisis de jurisprudencia” DER 2013-47866-C3-2- P, Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Spanish Government, led by Professor Susana Sanz-Caballero.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Interests of the Child" Approach Into Immigration Law and Procedure
    Carr: Incorporating a "Best Interests of the Child" Approach Into Immigration Law and Procedure Article Incorporating a "Best Interests of the Child" Approach Into Immigration Law and Procedure Bridgette A. Carr United States immigration law and procedurefrequently ignore the plight of children directly affected by immigration proceedings. This ignorance means decision-makers often lack the discretion to protect a child from persecution by halting the deportation of a parent, while parents must choose between abandoning their children in a foreign land and risking the torture of their children. United States immigration law systematically fails to consider the best interests of children directly affected by immigration proceedings. This failure has resulted in a split among the federal circuit courts of appeals regarding whether the persecution a child faces may be used to halt the deportation of a parent. The omission of a "best interests of the child" approach in immigration law and procedure for children who are accompanied by a parentfails to protect foreign national and United States citizen children. Models for eliminating these protection failures can be found in United States child welfare law and procedure, international law, and the immigration law of other nations, such as Canada. Building from these models, the United States must implement and give substantial weight to the best interests of directly affected children in its immigration law and procedure. t Visiting Assistant Clinical Professor, University of Michigan Law School. The author is deeply appreciative of the invaluable feedback received from Professors Marisa Cianciarulo, Stephanie Crino, Colette Routel, Kim Thomas, Vivek Sankaran, Cynthia Starnes, and David Thronson as well as the assistance from her research assistant Jacob Walker.
    [Show full text]
  • International Scientific Conference on Best Interest of the Child and Shared Parenting
    INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD AND SHARED PARENTING. DECEMBER 2-3, 2019. MÁLAGA, SPAIN ABSTRACTS WORKSHOPS Workshop 1A Best interest of the child and shared parenting SHARED PARENTING VS. CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF A PROGENITOR1 María Dolores Cano Hurtado Article 19 of the Constitution recognizes that Spanish have the right to freely choose their residence and to move through the national territory. They also have the right to freely enter and leave Spain under the terms established by law. Therefore, in the Constitutional text this right is set to freely determine the address where the person considers for various reasons (work, family, emotional ...). However, the marital domicile will be determined by mutual agreement and in case of discrepancy, as stated in article 70 of the Civil Code, the judge will resolve taking into account the family's interest. From the combination of both articles, we can affirm that when the family remains united in an atmosphere of harmonious coexistence there will be no problem, although there are minor children, to adopt the decision that best responds to the interests of all its members, modifying the address as many times they believe convenient, inside or outside the national territory. However, the problem is generated in cases of cessation of conjugal or couple living, where it will have been fixed, either by regulatory agreement legally approved, or failing that by judicial resolution, among other aspects, the exercise of parental rights , guard and custody, and where appropriate the regime of stays and visits for the non-custodial parent. Obviously, if the shared parenting system had been accepted, given its characteristics, this change of address (sometimes caused by parental alienation) in many cases will make its continuity unfeasible.
    [Show full text]
  • Barnahus Or Child's House
    Trauma-Free Justice, Care and Protection for Scotland’s Children: Learning from the Barnahus approach Background The first Barnahus or ‘Child’s House’ was established in Iceland in 1998, as a response to child sexual abuse. Inspired by American Child Advocacy Centresi the Barnahus is described by Bragi Guðbrandsson, Iceland’s Director General of Child Protection as: “a conscious attempt to synthesize the sophisticated investigative tradition of the US and the Nordic welfare tradition, based on the principles of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC).ii At the heart of the Barnahus approach is a trauma-informed multi-disciplinary approach which unites services for child victims and witnesses and their families to ensure that all children who come to the Barnahus are better off when they leave, regardless of the judicial outcome in their case. The Barnahus considers the journey from disclosure of violence to recovery through a child’s eyes. Instead of going to multiple different services, in multiple locations, rarely designed with the child’s needs or ease in mind, services (including justice, child protection, medical examination and trauma recovery and family support) come to the child at the Barnahus. A key role of the Barnahus is to help produce valid evidence for judicial proceedings by eliciting the child’s disclosure in a way that means the child does not have to appear in court, should the case be prosecuted.iii This reduces the risk of the child experiencing further trauma and enables them to start recovering from their experiences much more quickly.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Interest Standard Survived?: the Historic and Social Context Janet L
    Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship 1996 Why Has the Best Interest Standard Survived?: The Historic and Social Context Janet L. Dolgin Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship Recommended Citation Janet L. Dolgin, Why Has the Best Interest Standard Survived?: The Historic and Social Context, 16 Child. Legal Rts. J. 2 (1996) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/433 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPECIAL REPORT Why Has the Best-Interest Standard Survived?: The Historic and Social Context social and familial world within which the best- by Professor Janet L. Dolgin* interest standard was conceived, adopted, and For almost two centuries, American family law has institutionalized. Finally, the many advantages that asserted that it places children and their welfare at the best-interest standard has held for the legal the heart of custody and parentage determinations. system are described within the context of the legal That statement, institutionalized in the United history of family regulation during the past two States as the "best-interest" standard (or principle),1 centuries. has become almost impossible to attack. However, Thus, the central aim of this article is to the best-interest standard is widely criticized for explain how and why a principle so obviously flawed providing little concrete guidance to courts asked to and so openly criticized as the best-interest standard settle disputes involving children's custody.
    [Show full text]