From Donkeys to Destiny
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
SGT. SLAUGHTER Inducted by Davey O'hannon Listen Up, Maggots! The
SGT. SLAUGHTER Inducted by Davey O’Hannon Listen up, maggots! The Sarge was once beautiful, and that attracted enemy fire. In 1974, “Beautiful” Bobby Remus was preening around a ring in Vancouver, British Columbia, when he heard fans laughing. “I looked behind me and there was Bob Ramstead behind me blowing me kisses,” Remus said. That night, Slaughter told his wife that “Beautiful” Bobby was getting a dishonorable discharge. He cut his hair, returned it to its normal dark brown, and wrestled as “Bruiser” Bob Remus, one step in the transformation to the jut-jawed, gravel-voiced Marine Sgt. Slaughter, the first celebrity to become a G.I. Joe doll. In 1984, after Remus flipped from a decade as a heel to an American hero, Hasbro inked him as part of its G.I. Joe product line. Remus voiced his own character in the animated G.I. Joe TV series, had his own action figures, and worked as a spokesman for Hasbro. As befits a future soldier, Remus got hooked on wrestling through clandestine ops. Born in August 1948 in Meeker County, Minnesota, and raised west of Minneapolis, Remus was four or five years old, sleeping on a pullout couch, when he heard what sounded like people being killed in an adjacent room. “Here was my father and bunch of his friends and my uncles yelling at the TV screen, watching professional wrestling,” he said. “I started to fake like I was sleeping on Saturdays and I’d crawl out there and watch the show without them even knowing it.” After he graduated from high school, served in the Marines, and joined his dad’s roofing company, Remus trained with Verne Gagne. -
Implicit Theories of Friendships: Examining the Roles of Growth and Destiny Beliefs in Children's Friendships a DISSERTATION
Implicit Theories of Friendships: Examining the Roles of Growth and Destiny Beliefs in Children’s Friendships A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Sara Gayle Kempner IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY W. Andrew Collins, Ph.D., Nicki R. Crick, Ph.D. August 2008 © Sara Gayle Kempner 2008 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisors, Andy Collins and Nicki Crick. Andy, thank you for being a mentor and advisor to me and supporting the development of my interests. Your continuing dedication to my education means so much to me. Nicki, you welcomed me into your lab and allowed me to broaden my research experiences. I am grateful for your nurturance and support. I would like to thank my committee members Richard Weinberg and Jeffry Simpson. Rich, you have been a great supporter of all my interests in graduate school. Jeff, it was in your close relationships seminar where the ideas for this project first emerged. Thank you for being a part of this project. I owe a great deal of gratitude to the schools, teachers, and children who participated in this study and shared their thoughts with me. Especially one child who asked me how I was going to use their answers to get a Ph.D. After explaining that I would put their answers into a computer, analyze it, and write a paper the child remarked, “Well that sounds pretty easy!” I would like to thank all the undergraduates who helped collect and enter data. -
What Is Philosophy.Pdf
I N T R O D U C T I O N What Is Philosophy? CHAPTER 1 The Task of Philosophy CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Reflection—thinking things over—. [is] the beginning of philosophy.1 In this chapter we will address the following questions: N What Does “Philosophy” Mean? N Why Do We Need Philosophy? N What Are the Traditional Branches of Philosophy? N Is There a Basic Method of Philo- sophical Thinking? N How May Philosophy Be Used? N Is Philosophy of Education Useful? N What Is Happening in Philosophy Today? The Meanings Each of us has a philos- “having” and “doing”—cannot be treated en- ophy, even though we tirely independent of each other, for if we did of Philosophy may not be aware of not have a philosophy in the formal, personal it. We all have some sense, then we could not do a philosophy in the ideas concerning physical objects, our fellow critical, reflective sense. persons, the meaning of life, death, God, right Having a philosophy, however, is not suffi- and wrong, beauty and ugliness, and the like. Of cient for doing philosophy. A genuine philo- course, these ideas are acquired in a variety sophical attitude is searching and critical; it is of ways, and they may be vague and confused. open-minded and tolerant—willing to look at all We are continuously engaged, especially during sides of an issue without prejudice. To philoso- the early years of our lives, in acquiring views phize is not merely to read and know philoso- and attitudes from our family, from friends, and phy; there are skills of argumentation to be mas- from various other individuals and groups. -
Benjamin's Moment
BENJAMIN’S MOMENT Kia Lindroos Man könnte sagen, daß unsern tiefsten Augenblicken gleich jenen Päkchenzigaretten – ein kleines Bildchen, ein Photo unsrer selbst – ist mitgegeben worden. Und jenes “ganze Leben” das, wie wir oft hören, an Sterbenden oder an Menchen, die in der Gefahr zu sterben schwe- ben, vorüberzieht, setzt sich genau aus diesen kleinen Bildchen zusammen. (Walter Benjamin, Aus einer kleinen Rede über Proust, GS II. 3: 1064). In this essay, I focus on the Benjaminian moment. The moment is un- derstood firstly as a temporal instance that has become a meaningful issue in several of Benjamin’s essays on literature, history, film and photography. Secondly, I thematise the more extensive Benjaminian moment, which occupies a central position in 20th Century thought. For instance, Michael Löwy notes that Benjamin’s Geschichtsphiloso- phische Thesen is the most significant and revolutionary document since Marx’s Thesen über Feuerbach” (Löwy 2001: 4-5). One core argu- ment in Benjamin’s Thesen is the importance of emphasising revo- lutionary action as a rupture, a form of action with the potential to intervene in any unquestioned continuum of thinking, action, or po- litical, historical or aesthetic understanding. His aim is to highlight the relevance of various forms of present experiences, for example in understanding revolutionary action as marking the desire to pull ‘the emergency break’ as opposed to remaining a complacent passenger in the train ‘of history’ (cf. Benjamin GS 1.3: 1232). It is this revolu- 115 BENJAMIN’S MOMENT tionary character of the Benjaminian moment that remains relevant to this day and highlights the significance of Benjamin among theo- rists on time and history. -
Eternal Destiny Pt5 the Path to Destiny
Eternal Destiny pt5 The Path to Destiny Re 20:11-21:8/ Ro 8:28-29 Eternal Destiny pt5 The Path to Destiny What is Destiny? • Destiny is the path established by God for every individual before the foundation of the world that leads to the discovery of the essential purpose for their existence. Eternal Destiny pt5 The Path to Destiny Define Purpose • Simply, the reason for which anything is created or exists Eternal Destiny pt5 The Path to Destiny • PURPOSE is established in us before the earth was formed (before time) (Eph1:4-6) 1. Chronos: • Each of us is given a “Measure of Time” to discover, develop and establish PURPOSE – This is known as Chronos . Within the confines of Chronos is Kairos. 1. Kairos: a. The opportune and decisive moment. b. In the New Testament, kairos means "the appointed time in the purpose of God"; the time when God acts Eternal Destiny pt5 The Path to Destiny A.7 Directives for the Believer of Purpose 1.Bring Glory to God 2.Praise & Worship 3.Bear Fruit 4.Love One Another 5.Preach the Gospel 6.Make Disciples 7.Serve One Another Eternal Destiny pt5 The Path to Destiny Keys to Discovering Your Specific Purpose by Shana Schutte 1.Listen to your dissatisfactions 2.Listen to others 3.Listen to your gifts 4.Listen to your passions Eternal Destiny pt5 The Path to Destiny What is Destiny? • Destiny is the path (of life) established by God for every individual before the foundation of the world that leads to the discovery of the essential purpose for their existence. -
Nietzsche's Doctrine of Eternal Return
University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Senior Honors Projects Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island 2007 Nietzsche’s Doctrine of Eternal Return David R. Gadon University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Gadon, David R., "Nietzsche’s Doctrine of Eternal Return" (2007). Senior Honors Projects. Paper 47. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/47http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/47 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nietzsche’s Doctrine of Eternal Return David Ray Gadon Honors Senior Thesis Spring 2007 Sponsor: Dr. Galen A. Johnson Gadon 2 Nietzsche’s Doctrine of Eternal Return “Six thousand feet beyond man and time.” 1 In the Western world, we have a pronounced affinity for understanding time as something ultimately simple. Despite our recognition of the differences in subjective perception of the passing of intervals, we tacitly affirm that time itself must objectively follow a comprehensible structure of unidirectional flow which, like the commonly cited river metaphor, begins at one point and is definitively moving towards another. Thanks especially to the Judeo-Christian model of history plowing inevitably towards a conclusion at the end of days, even in the absence of direct religious influence, our intuitive understanding of time remains linear. We see this model addressed and contested by metaphysicians throughout the ages, but only rarely do we glimpse a philosophy that is able to cogently upturn this intuitively correct ideal. -
Fate, Destiny and Eternal Recurrence
FATE, DESTINY AND ETERNAL RECURRENCE ‘Love is our true destiny’ Thomas Merton Fate and Destiny The concepts of fate and destiny are often confused. The term “fate” is derived from the Latin word fatum, meaning “that which has been spoken.” Fate is based on the idea that there is a natural order in the universe or a preordained course of events, which cannot be changed. “Destiny,” on the other hand, is derived from the Latin word destino, meaning “that which has been firmly established.” Unlike fate, there is an element of choice and freedom in destiny – it is something we can potentially shape and alter through free will. Fate is unavoidable and inevitable; destiny can be modified and altered. Throughout history, philosophers, mystics, poets, statesmen, and even humorists have contemplated the meaning and significance of fate and destiny: · Marcus Aurelius: “Accept the things to which fate binds you, and love the people with whom fate brings you together, but do so with all your heart.” · The Bhagavad Gita: “It is better to live your own destiny imperfectly than to live an imitation of somebody else’s life with perfection.” · Shakespeare: “It is not in the stars to hold our destiny but in ourselves.” · Hafiz: “The place you are right now God circled on a map for you.” · Goethe: “Destiny grants us our wishes, but in its own way, in order to give us something beyond our wishes.” · John Galsworthy: “Life calls the tune, we dance.” · William Jennings Bryan: “Destiny is not a matter of chance. It is a matter of choice. -
Nwa Dvd Match Lists
NWA DVD MATCH LISTS NWA Disc 1 (61-77) 17. Ric Flair vs Tony Russo 1/14/1980 47 sec NWA Disc 3 (1978-1979) 18. Ric Flair vs Billy Star 2/12/1980 6:01 1. Buddy Rogers vs Pat O'Connor (3rd fall) 6/30/1961 4 mins 19. Freebirds blind JYD 3/5/1980 (Rogers wins NWA title) 1. Ric Flair vs Jumbo Tsuruta (2/3 falls) 4/27/1978 32:07 (Flair’s 20. Mulligan vs Superstar (tourney final)Flair 4/6/1980 1 min 2. Ric Flair vs Chris Taylor 12/13/1973 4 mins Japan debut) (Superstar wins NWA TV title) 3. Ric Flair/Rip Hawk interview 1974 2. Flair/Superstar vs Steamboat/Jones 1978 (House Show) 5 mins 21. Masked Superstar Interview 4/6/1980 4. Jack Brisco vs Shohei Baba (2/3 falls) 12/2/1974 24:46 (Baba 3. Ric Flair vs Blackjack Mulligan (Cage) 1978 (House Show) 4 22. Ric Flair vs Jimmy Sunka 4/20/1980 2 mins (Flair wins US title) wins NWA title) mins 23. Snuka/Sheik/Gene Anderson interview 4/27/1980 5. Harley Race vs Dory Funk Jr 5/24/1973 1 min (Harley Race wins 4. Ric Flair vs BJ Mulligan 1978 (House Show) 7 mins 24. Rhodes/Ole vs Assassins cage(Ole turns) 7/1/1980 3 mins NWA title) 5. Ric Flair vs BJ Mulligan (Texas Death) 1978 (House Show) 8 25. Flair/Valentine vs Sheik/Snuka 7/8/1980 7 mins 6. Dusty Rhodes vs The Shiek 1975 2 mins mins 26. -
When God Alters Our Fate: Relational Freedom in Romans 5:1–11 and 8:18–39
start page: 223 Stellenbosch eological Journal 2018, Vol 4, No 2, 223–241 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17570/stj.2018.v4n2.a11 Online ISSN 2413-9467 | Print ISSN 2413-9459 2018 © Pieter de Waal Neethling Trust When God alters our fate: Relational freedom in Romans 5:1–11 and 8:18–39 Stephan Joubert University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa [email protected] Abstract Fate played an enormous role in the Ancient Mediterranean world. Fate was personified in numerous ancient deities such as the Keres, the Moirae, and Fortuna. At the same time Stoic views on fate, as a chain of causes, impacted hugely on the ancients’ general view on fate as an inexorable force which cannot be opposed, or whose direction and eventual outcomes cannot be changed. Against the backdrop, Paul’s understanding of the nature of God’s presence, actions and influence in the lives of believers in Romans 5:1–10 and 8:18–39 is discussed. Fate, in the sense of that which has been predetermined and written into the lives of individuals before birth, and which comes into existence in many different, fixed forms, or fate as a chain of causes, is never on Paul’s mind. God’s foreordained plan is not a predetermined, unalterable fate for each and every person over which they have no control or say whatsoever. Rather, God’s πρόθεσις (prothesis) relates to the salvation of all believers. God refuses to surrender his people to their fate, namely death and eternal destruction. He changes fate into destiny for all who believe in Christ. -
January 5, 1982 in Canton, OH Civic Center Drawing 2,000 1. Brad
January 5, 1982 in Canton, OH August 27, 1982 in Canton, OH Civic Center drawing 2,000 Civic Center drawing ??? 1. Brad Armstrong drew Buzz Sawyer. 1. Brad Armstrong beat Pete Martin. 2. Bob Armstrong beat The Angel. 2. Les Thornton beat Terry Gibbs. 3. Jimmy Garvin beat Ron Bass. 3. The Masked Superstar beat Mr. Wrestling II. 4. Michael Hayes beat Terry Gordy via DQ. 4. Ernie Ladd & Tommy Rich beat The Super Destroyer & Buzz Sawyer via 5. Mr. Wrestling II & Tommy Rich beat The Masked Superstar & The Super DQ. Destroyer. 5. Paul Orndorff beat Don Muraco. Note: The GCW shows were promoted by Vince Risko. September 22, 1982 in Canton, OH Civic Center drawing ??? April 13, 1982 in Canton, OH 1. Johnny Rich beat Chick Donovan. Civic Center drawing 1,980 2. Matt Borne beat Tom Pritchard. 3. Tito Santana & Paul Orndorff beat The Iron Sheik & Ivan Koloff via DQ. 1. Kevin Sullivan drew Brad Armstrong. 4. Roddy Piper beat The Super Destroyer. 2. Buzz Sawyer beat Tom Pritchard. 5. Buzz Sawyer pinned Tommy Rich. 3. John Studd & The Super Destroyer beat Bob Armstrong & Leroy Brown. 4. Dusty Rhodes beat The Great Kanuki via DQ. 5. Tommy Rich beat Ron Bass via DQ. October 18, 1982 in Canton, OH Civic Center drawing ??? 1. Iron Sheik pinned Brad Armstrong (5:50). April 27, 1982 in Canton, OH 2. Ivan Koloff pinned Johnny Rich (12:35). Civic Center drawing 2,000 3. The Wild Samoans DDQ Stan Hansen & Tito Santana (15:00). 4. Roddy Piper pinned Ole Anderson (15:00). -
DAVID ABBOTT Tank Abbott RICHARD ACELINGER
DAVID ABBOTT Tank Abbott RICHARD ACELINGER Richard Slinger ANGEL ACEVEDO Cuban Assassin GABRIEL ACOCELLA Jack Britton DONNA ADAMO Elektra BROOKE ADAMS Brooke (ECW) BRYAN ADAMS Crush CHRIS ADAMS Gentleman Chris Adams Masked Avenger TONI ADAMS Nancy Simpson Toni the Tigress JOSH ADAMSON Johnny Spade DON ADELBERG Don E. Allen JONAH ADELMAN Jonah JOSEPH ADKINS Malachi STEVEN ADKINS Seth Skyfire CHRIS ADKISSON Chris Von Erich DAVID ADKISSON David Von Erich JACK ADKISSON Fritz Von Erich KERRY ADKISSON Texas Tornado Kerry Von Erich KEVIN ADKISSON Kevin Von Erich LACEY ADKISSON Lacy Von Erich MIKE ADKISSON Mike Von Erich MILTON ADOMO El Nene RICHARD AFFLIS Dick the Bruiser FRANCISCO AGUAYO Charro Aguayo PEDRO AGUAYO Perro Aguayo AARON AGUILERA Jesus Aguilera Hardkore Kid Conquistador Uno JASON AHRNDT Venom Joey Abs SUSAN AITCHISON Duchess of Queensberry TAKESHI AKABANE Little Tokyo SHOJI AKIYOSHI Coolie S.Z. Punish Jado LOUIS ALBANO Captain Lou Albano ACHIM ALBRECHT Brakus BRENT ALBRIGHT Gunner Scott GARY ALBRIGHT Gary Albright Volkan Singh BEN ALCORN Dudeman NICK ALDIS Brutus Magnus MODESTO ALEDO Kamikaze MICHELLE ALEXANDER Michelle McCool MICHAEL ALFONSO Mike Awesome That 70's Guy KAZEM ALI Armando Alejandro Estrada JEFFERSON ALLEN Nikita Allenov RICK ALLEN Sonny Beach TERRY ALLEN Magnum T.A. MICHAEL ALTIERI Mikey Batts AL AMEZCUA Golden Terror ALFONSO AMEZOUA Alfonso Dantes CHAE AN Nitro Girl Chae ANDY ANDERSON Andy Anderson BILL ANDERSON Bill Laster CHIQUITA ANDERSON Nitro Girl Chiquita EUGENE ANDERSON Gene Anderson KEN ANDERSON Ken Kennedy MELISSA ANDERSON Raisha Saeed RANDY ANDERSON Randy "Pee Wee" Anderson WCW Referee ERIC ANGLE Eric Angle KURT ANGLE Kurt Angle TED ANNIS Teddy Hart ARTHUR ANOIA Wild Samoan Afa ARTHUR ANOIA JR. -
Josephus' Use of Heimarmene in the Jewish Antiquities Xiii, 171-3
JOSEPHUS' USE OF HEIMARMENE IN THE JEWISH ANTIQUITIES XIII, 171-3 LUTHER H. MARTIN Josephus uses the word heimarmene (fate, or, destiny) in but four passages in his Jewish Antiquities: XIII, 171-3: XVI, 397; XVIII, 12-22; and XIX, 347.1 In two of these passages, XIII, 171-3 and XVIII, 12-22, as well as in a parallel passage in The Jewish War II, 162-6, he uses the issue of determinism to distinguish between the three Jewish "philosophies": the Pharisees, the Sadducees, and the Essenes.2 2 The Pharisees, according to Josephus in Ant. XVIII: postulate that everything is brought about by fate still they do not deprive the human will of the pursuit of what is in man's power, since it was God's good pleasure that there should be a fusion and that the will of man with his virtue and vice should be admitted to the council-chamber of fate. (Ant. XVIII, 13) Later, in this same passage, he characterizes the position of the Sadducees and the Essenes by contrasting them with this Pharisaic position on heimarmene. The Sadducees, he writes, "own no obser- vance of any sort apart from the laws," while the Essenes "leave everything in the hands of God" (Ant. XVIII, 16). Josephus also refers here (Ant. XVIII, 11) to a parallel account in the second book of his earlier The Jewish War, in which he described both the Pharisees and the Sadducees, in part, in terms of their contrasting attitudes towards heimarmene: the Pharisees... attribute everything to Fate (alyapyivq) and to God; they hold that to act rightly or otherwise rests, indeed, for the most part with men, but that in each action Fate (alyapyivq) cooperates...