DOCSLIB.ORG

Study of the Resistance to Cucumber Mosaic Virus Aggressive Strains in the Melon (Cucumis Melon L.) Accession PI 161375

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Study of the Resistance to Cucumber Mosaic Virus Aggressive Strains in the Melon (Cucumis Melon L.) Accession PI 161375 ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA Facultat de Biociències Dept. Biologia Animal, Biologia Vegetal i Ecologia Study of the resistance to Cucumber mosaic virus aggressive strains in the melon (Cucumis melon L.) accession PI 161375 Dissertation presented by Jinqiang Yan for the degree of Doctor in Plant Biology and Biotechnology by the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB). This work was performed in the Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG). Thesis directors Tutor PhD candidate Dra. Ana Montserrat Dra. Marta Pujol Dra. Ana Montserrat Jinqiang Yan Martín Hernández Abajo Martín Hernández Barcelona, October 2018 Index Index of contents Summary Resumen Resum Abbreviations Introduction 1. Plant viruses ................................................................................................ 3 2. Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) .................................................................. 3 2.1 Genome organization ................................................................................................3 2.2 Taxonomy and classification.....................................................................................5 2.3 CMV viral cycle ........................................................................................................6 2.3.1 Viral replication .................................................................................................6 2.3.2 Cell-to-cell movement .......................................................................................7 2.3.3 Long-distance movement ..................................................................................8 2.4 Plant host ...................................................................................................................9 2.5 Virus transmission and management ......................................................................10 3. Resistance to CMV ................................................................................... 11 3.1 Natural resistance ....................................................................................................11 3.2 Transgenic plants ................................................................................................... 13 3.2.1 pathogen-derived resistance ............................................................................13 3.2.2 Non-pathogen-derived resistance strategies ....................................................14 4. Melon ....................................................................................................... 14 4.1 Melon taxonomy and diversity................................................................................15 4.2 Genetic and genomic resources in melon................................................................16 4.3 Melon reference genome .........................................................................................19 4.4 Melon diseases and resistance .................................................................................20 4.4.1 Insects .................................................................................................................. 4.4.2 Fungi and bacteria ...........................................................................................20 4.4.3 Virus ............................................................................................................... 21 4.4.4 Resistance to CMV in the melon line PI 161375 ......................................... 21 Objectives ....................................................................................... 23 Material and Methods 1. Pant materials ........................................................................................... 27 1.1 Melon lines ............................................................................................................ 27 1.2 Nicotiana benthanimana and zucchini squash .......................................................28 2. Viruses....................................................................................................... 28 2.1 Viral strains ........................................................................................................... 28 2.2 Viral clones for in vitro transcription and agro-infiltration .................................. 28 3. Bacterial strains ......................................................................................... 29 4. Virus inoculations ..................................................................................... 29 4.1 Sap inoculation ...................................................................................................... 29 4.2 Agro-infiltration and viral RNA inoculation ......................................................... 30 5. DNA isolation ........................................................................................... 30 5.1 Genomic DNA extraction ...................................................................................... 30 5.2 Genomic DNA extraction for re-sequencing melon lines ..................................... 30 5.3 Plasmid DNA extraction ........................................................................................ 31 6. RNA isolation ........................................................................................... 31 6.1 Total RNA extraction using Tri-Reagent .............................................................. 31 6.2 Total RNA extraction using Plant mini kit ........................................................... 31 7. Introgression lines re-sequencing ............................................................ 31 8. In vitro transcription ................................................................................ 32 9. Plasmid construction ................................................................................. 32 10. Virus detection ....................................................................................... 33 10.1 ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay) ............................................. 33 10.2 Visual phenotyping ............................................................................................. 33 10.3 Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) ............................. 34 10.4 Real time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) ....................................................... 34 11. Data analysis .......................................................................................... 35 12. Genotyping .............................................................................................. 36 12.1 SNP genotyping (single-nucleotide polymorphism) ........................................... 36 12.2 SSR (Simple Sequence Repeat) ........................................................................... 36 12.3 CAPS (Cleaved Amplified Polymorphic Sequences) ........................................ 36 13. Genetic map construction ....................................................................... 38 14. QTL analysis ........................................................................................... 38 15. Sanger sequencing................................................................................... 38 Results Part I QTL analysis for resistance to the aggressive train CMV-FNY I.1 Screening for CMV-FNY resistance ..................................................................... 43 I.2 Production of F2 populations ................................................................................. 45 I.3 QTL analysis with the F2 population made from the cross DHL142 x DHL2012 .............................................................................................. 46 I.3.1 Phenotypic analysis of CMV-FNY resistance ............................................... 46 I.3.2 Genotyping and construction of genetic map ................................................. 48 I.3.3 QTL analysis ................................................................................................... 50 I.4 QTL analysis with the F2 population made from cross DHL142 x 20-91-15 ....... 51 I.4.1 Phenotypic analysis of CMV-FNY resistance ............................................... 52 I.4.2 Genotyping and construction of genetic map ................................................. 54 I.4.3 QTL analysis ................................................................................................... 56 I.5 QTL analysis with the F2 population from the cross DHL69 x DHL2012 ........... 57 I.5.1 Phenotypic analysis of CMV-FNY resistance ............................................... 57 I.5.2 Genotyping and construction of genetic map ................................................. 59 I.5.3 QTL analysis ................................................................................................... 61 I.6 QTL analysis with F2 population made from cross DHL142 x DHL1046 ........... 62
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "Virus Transmission by Aphis' Gossypii 'Glover to Aphid-Resistant And
    J. AMER. Soc. HORT. SCI. 117(2):248-254. 1992. Virus Transmission by Aphis gossypii Glover to Aphid-resistant and Susceptible Muskmelons Albert N. Kishaba1, Steven J. Castle2, and Donald L. Coudriet3 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Boyden Entomology Laborato~, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 James D. McCreight4 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Agricultural Research Station, 1636 East Alisal Street, Salinas, CA 93905 G. Weston Bohn5 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Irrigated Desert Research Station, 4151 Highway 86, Brawley, CA 92227 Additional index words. Cucumis melo, watermelon mosaic virus, zucchini yellow mosaic virus, melon aphid, melon aphid resistance Abstract. The spread of watermelon mosaic virus by the melon aphid (Aphis gossypii Glover) was 31%, 74%, and 71% less to a melon aphid-resistant muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) breeding line than to the susceptible recurrent parent in a field cage study. Aphid-resistant and susceptible plants served equally well as the virus source. The highest rate of infection was noted when target plants were all melon-aphid susceptible, least (26.7%) when the target plants were all melon-aphid resistant, and intermediate (69.4%) when the target plants were an equal mix of aphid-resistant and susceptible plants. The number of viruliferous aphids per plant required to cause a 50% infection varied from five to 20 on susceptible controls and from 60 to possibly more than 400 on a range of melon aphid- resistant populations. An F family from a cross of the melon aphid-resistant AR Topmark (AR TM) with the susceptible ‘PMR 45’ had significantly less resistance to virus transmission than AR TM.
    [Show full text]
  • Melon Aphid Or Cotton Aphid, Aphis Gossypii Glover (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae)1 John L
    EENY-173 Melon Aphid or Cotton Aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae)1 John L. Capinera2 Distribution generation can be completed parthenogenetically in about seven days. Melon aphid occurs in tropical and temperate regions throughout the world except northernmost areas. In the In the south, and at least as far north as Arkansas, sexual United States, it is regularly a pest in the southeast and forms are not important. Females continue to produce southwest, but is occasionally damaging everywhere. Be- offspring without mating so long as weather allows feeding cause melon aphid sometimes overwinters in greenhouses, and growth. Unlike many aphid species, melon aphid is and may be introduced into the field with transplants in the not adversely affected by hot weather. Melon aphid can spring, it has potential to be damaging almost anywhere. complete its development and reproduce in as little as a week, so numerous generations are possible under suitable Life Cycle and Description environmental conditions. The life cycle differs greatly between north and south. In the north, female nymphs hatch from eggs in the spring on Egg the primary hosts. They may feed, mature, and reproduce When first deposited, the eggs are yellow, but they soon parthenogenetically (viviparously) on this host all summer, become shiny black in color. As noted previously, the eggs or they may produce winged females that disperse to normally are deposited on catalpa and rose of sharon. secondary hosts and form new colonies. The dispersants typically select new growth to feed upon, and may produce Nymph both winged (alate) and wingless (apterous) female The nymphs vary in color from tan to gray or green, and offspring.
    [Show full text]
  • Infection Cycle of Watermelon Mosaic Virus
    Infection Cycle of Watermelon Mosaic Virus By TAKASHI YAMAMOTO* Agronomy Division, Shikoku National Agricultural Experiment Station (Senyucho, Zentsuji, Kagawa, 765 Japan) Among the viruses occurring in cucurbits transmission. As to other vectors, many of in Japan, the most prevalent ones are water­ them showed low parasitism to cucurbits and melon mosaic virus (WMV) and cucumber low ability of transmitting WMV, so that their mosaic virus (CMV) . Of them, WMV occurs role for the spread of WMV in the field was mainly in the summer season in the Kanto not clear. A survey conducted in fields of region and westward. The WMV diseases in cucurbits in 1981 spring to know the kinds of cucurbits cause not only systemic symptoms aphids which fly to the cucurbits at the initial such as mosaic, dwarf, etc. but also fruit mal­ incidence of WMV showed that more than a formation, thus giving severe damage to crops. half of the aphid species sampled were vector In addition, the control of WMV is quite dif­ species (Table 2). The initial incidence of ficult as the virus is transmitted by aphids WMV occurs usually in the period from mid­ and that carried by plant sap is also infectious. May to early-June at the survey site (west Thus, WMV is one of the greatest obstacles part of Kagawa Prefecture), and this period to the production of cucurbits. coincides with the period of abundant appear­ The infection cycle of the WMV, including ance of aphids. In this period, vector species the routes of transmission of the virus by less parasitic to cucurbits also flew in plenty aphids, which is the most important in con­ to cucurbits.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Strategies of Aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) As Vectors of Pepper Viruses in Western Massachusetts
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1988 Management strategies of aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) as vectors of pepper viruses in western Massachusetts. Dario Corredor University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Corredor, Dario, "Management strategies of aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) as vectors of pepper viruses in western Massachusetts." (1988). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 5636. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/5636 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES OF APHIDS (HOMOPTERA: APHIDIDAE) AS VECTORS OF PEPPER VIRUSES IN WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS A Dissertation Presented by Dario Corredor Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 1988 Entomology c Copyright by Dario Corredor 1988 All Rights Reserved MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES OF APHIDS (HOMOPTERA: APHIDIDAE) AS VECTORS OF PEPPER VIRUSES IN WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS A Dissertation Presented by Dario Corredor David N. Ferro, Chairman of Committee To Consuelo, Paula and Anamaria whose love and support helped me through all these years. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT S I thank my friend and major advisor David N. Ferro for his advice, support and patience while I was a graduate student. I also want to thank Drs. Ronald J. Prokopy and George N. Agrios for their advice in designing the experiments and for reviewing the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Viral Diseases of Cucurbits
    report on RPD No. 926 PLANT December 2012 DEPARTMENT OF CROP SCIENCES DISEASE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN VIRAL DISEASES OF CUCURBITS Most common viral diseases of cucurbits in Illinois are cucumber mosaic (Cucumber mosaic virus), papaya ringspot (Papaya ringspot virus), squash mosaic (Squash mosaic virus), watermelon mosaic (Watermelon mosaic virus), and zucchini yellow mosaic (Zucchini yellow mosaic virus). Depends on the time of infection, viral diseases could cause up to 100% yield losses in cucurbit fields in Illinois. Statewide surveys and laboratory and greenhouse tests conducted during 2004-2006 showed that Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV) was the most prevalent virus in commercial gourd, pumpkin, and squash fields in Illinois. Squash mosaic virus (SqMV) was the second most prevalent virus in commercial gourd, pumpkin, and squash fields. SqMV was detected in more counties than any other five viruses. Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Papaya ringspot virus (PRSV), and Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) were less prevalent in commercial gourd, pumpkin, and squash fields. All of five viruses were present alone and mixed in the samples tested. Earlier in the growing seasons (July and early August), single-virus infections were detected. Mixed infections were more common from mid August until the end of the growing season in October. Dual infection of WMV and SqMV was the most prevalent mixed virus infection detected in the fields. Most viruses infecting pumpkin and squash showed similar symptoms. The most common symptoms observed in the commercial fields and in the greenhouse studies were light- and dark- green mosaic, puckering, veinbanding, veinclearing, and deformation of leaves of gourd, pumpkin, and squash.
    [Show full text]
  • WATERMELON MOSAIC VIRUS of PUMPKIN (Cucurbita Maxima) from SULAWESI: IDENTIFICATION, TRANSMISSION, and HOST RANGE
    IndonesianWatermelon Journalmosaic virusof Agricultural of pumpkin Science 3(1) 2002: 33-36 33 Short Communication WATERMELON MOSAIC VIRUS OF PUMPKIN (Cucurbita maxima) FROM SULAWESI: IDENTIFICATION, TRANSMISSION, AND HOST RANGE Wasmo Wakmana, M.S. Kontonga, D.S. Teakleb, and D.M. Persleyc aIndonesian Cereals Research Institute, Jalan Ratulangi 274, Maros 90154, Indonesia bDepartment of Microbiology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld. 407, Australia cDepartment of Primary Industries, Plant Protection Unit, Meiers Rd., Indooroopilly, Qld. 4088, Australia ABSTRACT have a world-wide distribution including China, Canada, USA, Europe, South Africa, Japan, Hawaii, A mosaic disease of pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima) was spread and Cuba (Gibbs and Harrison, 1970; van Regen- widely in Sulawesi. Since the virus had not yet been identified, mortel, 1971; Lisa and Lecoq, 1984). a study was conducted to identify the disease through mechani- Some viruses that infected cucurbits were able to cal inoculation, aphid vector transmission, host range, and infect many other hosts, e.g., cucumber mosaic virus electron microscopic test. Crude sap of infected pumpkin leaf samples was rubbed on the cotyledons of healthy pumpkin (CMV) also infected tobacco, chili, tomato, corn, seedlings for mechanical inoculation. For insect transmission, banana, celery, bean, etc. (Walker, 1957; Semangun, five infective aphids were infected per seedling. Seedlings of 1994), cucumber, melon, squash, peppers, spinach, eleven different species were inoculated mechanically for host beets, crucifers, gladiolus, lilies, petunias, zinnias, range test. Clarified sap was examined under the electron and many weeds (Agrios, 1969). In Yogyakarta, at microscope. Seeds of two pumpkin fruits from two different least four viruses infected cucurbits, i.e., CMV, water- infected plants were planted and observed for disease trans- mission up to one-month old seedlings.
    [Show full text]
  • Aphid Transmission of Potyvirus: the Largest Plant-Infecting RNA Virus Genus
    Supplementary Aphid Transmission of Potyvirus: The Largest Plant-Infecting RNA Virus Genus Kiran R. Gadhave 1,2,*,†, Saurabh Gautam 3,†, David A. Rasmussen 2 and Rajagopalbabu Srinivasan 3 1 Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA 2 Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]. † Authors contributed equally. Received: 13 May 2020; Accepted: 15 July 2020; Published: date Abstract: Potyviruses are the largest group of plant infecting RNA viruses that cause significant losses in a wide range of crops across the globe. The majority of viruses in the genus Potyvirus are transmitted by aphids in a non-persistent, non-circulative manner and have been extensively studied vis-à-vis their structure, taxonomy, evolution, diagnosis, transmission and molecular interactions with hosts. This comprehensive review exclusively discusses potyviruses and their transmission by aphid vectors, specifically in the light of several virus, aphid and plant factors, and how their interplay influences potyviral binding in aphids, aphid behavior and fitness, host plant biochemistry, virus epidemics, and transmission bottlenecks. We present the heatmap of the global distribution of potyvirus species, variation in the potyviral coat protein gene, and top aphid vectors of potyviruses. Lastly, we examine how the fundamental understanding of these multi-partite interactions through multi-omics approaches is already contributing to, and can have future implications for, devising effective and sustainable management strategies against aphid- transmitted potyviruses to global agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) For: Aphis Nerii
    Rapid Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) for: Aphis nerii April 2015 Stage 1: Initiation 1. What is the name of the pest? Aphis nerii Boyer de Fonscolombe (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Up to 11 synonyms are associated with A. nerii, though only Aphis lutescens appears regularly in the literature. Common names: oleander aphid, milkweed aphid. 2. What initiated this rapid PRA? In November 2014 entomologists at Fera received samples of an aphid from a private residence in London that were confirmed as Aphis nerii (Sharon Reid pers. comm. 05.11.2014). These samples had been requested after the presence of the pest was published online in a blog (Taylor 2012). The species has been present at the residence every year since 2008, indicating an established population. An update to the 2002 PRA (MacLeod, 2002) was initiated to determine the implications of this establishment and the impacts the pest may have in the UK. 3. What is the PRA area? The PRA area is the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 1 Stage 2: Risk Assessment 4. What is the pest’s status in the EC Plant Health Directive (Council Directive 2000/29/EC1) and in the lists of EPPO2? The pest is not listed in the EC Plant Health Directive and is not recommended for regulation as a quarantine pest by EPPO, nor is it on the EPPO Alert List. 5. What is the pest’s current geographical distribution? The distribution of A. nerii has been described as found in “tropical to warm temperate regions throughout the world” (McAuslane, 2014) as well as including many of the remote pacific islands (Blackman et al., 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of an Emerging Isolate of Watermelon Mosaic Virus in Turkey
    INTERNAT İONAL JOURNAL OF AGR İCULTURE & BİOLOGY ISSN Print: 1560–8530; ISSN Online: 1814–9596 13–1449/2015/17–1–211–215 http://www.fspublishers.org Full Length Article Characterization of an Emerging Isolate of Watermelon Mosaic Virus in Turkey Muharrem Arap Kamberoglu 1*, Cecile Desbiez 2 and Asime Filiz Caliskan 1 1University of Cukurova, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Protection, 01330 Adana, Turkey 2INRA Pathologie Vegetale, UR407, 84140 Montfavet, France *For correspondence: [email protected] Abstract A watermelon mosaic virus isolate (WMV-Tr) was obtained from a naturally infected watermelon ( Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. and Nakai ) plant with mosaic, mottle and leaf deformation symptoms collected in the major cucurbit-growing area in Adana province of Turkey during a survey conducted in May 2009. DAS-ELISA and RT-PCR showed the presence of watermelon mosaic virus (WMV, Potyvirus ) in the sample. WMV-Tr was characterized biologically and its partial coat protein genome sequence was established. WMV-Tr had biological properties similar to those reported for the WMV isolates from different parts of the world. WMV-Tr belonged to molecular group 3, containing Asian isolates of WMV as well as isolates currently emerging in different parts of the world including Europe. This suggests recent emergence of Group 3 isolates in Turkey. © 2015 Friends Science Publishers Keywords: Watermelon; WMV; ELISA; RT-PCR; Emergence; Phylogenetic analysis Introduction temperate climate and subtropic regions. At least 29 species of Aphids, including Myzus persicae (Sulzer) and Aphis Fruit bearing vegetables are one of the most economically craccivora Koch , transmit the virus in a non-persistent important crops grown in Adana province in Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosaic Viruses of Cucurbit Crops
    Agnote No: I73 November 2010 Mosaic Viruses of Cucurbit Crops B. Conde, S. Smith and M. Connelly, Plant Industries, Darwin THE VIRUSES Mosaic viruses of cucurbits can cause severe production losses in the Top End of the Northern Territory. It is not uncommon to have 100% infection of cucurbit crops. Two viruses belonging to the potyvirus group are the cause of mosaic virus diseases in the Top End. The cucurbit strain of papaya ringspot virus (PRSV-W) previously known as watermelon mosaic virus strain 1 (WMV- 1) has been known to cause problems to cucurbits since 1977. A second potyvirus, zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) has also been the cause of mosaic virus diseases since 1989. Figure 1. Long melon infected with virus. Note the leaf distortion and typical 'mosaic' pattern of light and dark green on the leaf. CROPS AFFECTED Mosaic viruses are known to affect zucchini, squash, cucumber, long melons, smooth luffa, watermelon, rock melon, gramma pumpkins and other pumpkins such as butternut and Japanese. SYMPTOMS The diseases are called mosaics because the leaves of infected plants have a mottled or mosaic pattern of light and dark green instead of the normal dark green colour (Figure 1). Leaves of infected plants may also be distorted, bubbled or very narrow (especially in zucchini). Fruit found on green/black zucchini and butternuts after virus infection is often distorted with bubbles and is unmarketable. Golden squash and golden zucchini fruit on infected plants display a colour change where the yellow colour is replaced to some degree by green. HOW ARE THE VIRUSES SPREAD? Cucurbit viruses are spread by aphids.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Current Status of Potyviruses in Watermelon and Pumpkin Crops in Spain: Epidemiological Impact of Cultivated Plants and Mixed Infections
    plants Article Assessment of the Current Status of Potyviruses in Watermelon and Pumpkin Crops in Spain: Epidemiological Impact of Cultivated Plants and Mixed Infections Celia De Moya-Ruiz 1,†, Pilar Rabadán 1,†, Miguel Juárez 2 and Pedro Gómez 1,* 1 Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS)—CSIC, Departamento de Biología del Estrés y Patología Vegetal, P.O. Box 164, 30100 Murcia, Spain; [email protected] (C.D.M.-R.); [email protected] (P.R.) 2 Escuela Politécnica Superior de Orihuela, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Orihuela, 03312 Alicante, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-968-396-200 (ext. 6277) † Both authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Viral infections on cucurbit plants cause substantial quality and yield losses on their crops. The diseased plants can often be infected by multiple viruses, and their epidemiology may depend, in addition to the agro-ecological management practices, on the combination of these viral infections. Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV) is one of the most prevalent viruses in cucurbit crops, and Moroccan watermelon mosaic virus (MWMV) emerged as a related species that threatens these crops. The occurrence of WMV and MWMV was monitored in a total of 196 apical-leaf samples of watermelon and pumpkin plants that displayed mosaic symptoms. The samples were collected from 49 fields in three major cucurbit-producing areas in Spain (Castilla La-Mancha, Alicante, and Murcia) for three consecutive (2018–2020) seasons. A molecular hybridization dot-blot method revealed that WMV was mainly (53%) found in both cultivated plants, with an unadvertised occurrence of MWMV.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Studies of Aphid Vectors of Sugarcane Mosaic and Methods of Control
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1964 Field Studies of Aphid Vectors of Sugarcane Mosaic and Methods of Control. Konstantinos N. Komblas Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Komblas, Konstantinos N., "Field Studies of Aphid Vectors of Sugarcane Mosaic and Methods of Control." (1964). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 947. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/947 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 64-13, 260 microfilmed exactly as received KOMBLAS, Konstantinos N ., 1928- FIELD STUDIES OF APHID VECTORS OF SUGARCANE MOSAIC AND METHODS OF CONTROL. Louisiana State University, Ph. D ., 1964 Entomology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan FIELD STUDIES OF APHID VECTORS OF SUGARCANE MOSAIC AND METHODS OF CONTROL A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Entomology by Konstantinos N. Komblas B .S ., Agricultural College of Athens, 1954 M .S., Louisiana State University, 1962 May, 1964 AC KNO WLEDG MENTS The author would like to express his appreciation and gratitude to Dr. W. Henry Long, his major professor, for suggestions during this work and for assistance in the preparation of this manuscript; to Dr.
    [Show full text]