DOCSLIB.ORG

Multi-Stage Construction of the Little Cottonwood Stock, Utah: Origin, Intrusion, Venting,Mineralization, and Mass Movement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Multi-Stage Construction of the Little Cottonwood Stock, Utah: Origin, Intrusion, Venting,Mineralization, and Mass Movement Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2019-07-01 Multi-Stage Construction of the Little Cottonwood Stock, Utah: Origin, Intrusion, Venting,Mineralization, and Mass Movement Collin G. Jensen Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Jensen, Collin G., "Multi-Stage Construction of the Little Cottonwood Stock, Utah: Origin, Intrusion, Venting,Mineralization, and Mass Movement" (2019). Theses and Dissertations. 7552. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/7552 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Multi-Stage Construction of the Little Cottonwood Stock, Utah: Origin, Intrusion, Venting, Mineralization, and Mass Movement Collin G. Jensen A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Jeffrey D. Keith, Chair Eric H. Christiansen Michael Dorais Department of Geological Sciences Brigham Young University Copyright © 2019 Collin G. Jensen All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Multi-Stage Construction of the Little Cottonwood Stock, Utah: Origin, Intrusion, Venting, Mineralization, and Mass Movement Collin G. Jensen Department of Geological Sciences, BYU Master of Science The Little Cottonwood stock in central Utah, USA, is a composite granitic pluton that hosts the White Pine porphyry Mo-W deposit towards its northeast margin. The deposit is centered on the smaller White Pine intrusion, and associated igneous units include the Red Pine porphyry, phreatomagmatic pebble dikes, and rhyolite dikes. Twelve new U-Pb zircon LA-ICP- MS ages, for samples from this deposit and in pebble dikes from the nearby East Traverse Mountains, give peak ages of about 30 Ma and 27 Ma for the Little Cottonwood stock and White Pine intrusion, respectively, which correlate well with ages from previous studies. Ages of about 26 Ma were obtained for the previously undated Red Pine porphyry. The ages of the Little Cottonwood stock, White Pine intrusion, and Red Pine porphyry, as well as disparities in whole rock elemental differentiation trends, suggest that these units are magmatically distinct, and are not simply derivatives of one another with varying degrees of differentiation. Quench textures and resorbed quartz in the Red Pine porphyry are evidence that the magma system vented, which probably produced volcanic eruptions and emplacement of pebble dikes nearly synchronously with quartz-sericite-pyrite alteration and Mo-W mineralization. The mineralogy and geochemistry of these units imply that the magmas formed in a subduction-related magmatic arc setting rather than in an extensional basin related to orogenic collapse. Pebble dikes in the East Traverse Mountains 17 km away contain igneous clasts that resemble the units in the White Pine deposit in texture, mineralogy, and in U-Pb zircon ages. This supports other recent studies that suggest that the East Traverse Mountains rested atop the White Pine deposit prior to being displaced in a mega-landslide, and the pebble dikes in both locations are the top and bottom of the same mineralized phreatomagmatic system. The construction of the pluton began with intrusion of the Little Cottonwood stock, then the White Pine and Red Pine magmas. Fluid exsolution from the Red Pine magma accompanied venting, inception of the mineralizing hydrothermal system, and quenching to a porphyritic stock. Pebble dikes intruded into the overlying East Traverse Mountain block, which catastrophically failed millions of years later and was emplaced in its current location. Keywords: Little Cottonwood stock, granites, porphyry Mo deposits, U/Pb geochronology, hydrothermal alteration, pebble dikes, landslides ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Funding for this study came from the BYU College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, in part from the College High-Impact Research Program. Many thanks go to the many professors and students who helped this project become a thesis. First, my thesis advisor Jeff Keith, who first came up with the idea that the East Traverse Mountains are a landslide, and who provided constant encouragement as I worked on the project. I also extend thanks to the others of my committee: Eric Christiansen, who gave me direction and helped me work through many of the ideas in this paper, and Mike Dorais, a source of help with much of the petrography and mineralogy. Thanks also go to others who provided valuable thoughts and insight or field expertise on the project: Ron Harris, Bob Biek, Ken Krahulec, and Tim Thompson. Scott Thayne took us on a tour of the Geneva Rock gravel pit on Traverse Mountain to collect samples. Several people helped with analytical lab work both at BYU and at the University of Utah, including Mike Stearns, Diego Fernandez, Grant Rea, Mike Standing, David Tomlinson, and Tober Dyorich. And much thanks for many hours of field work and lab work go to the students of the Traverse Mountain Army, including Ryan Chadburn, Bret Young, Spencer Burr, Cameron Harrison, Chris Perfili, Lars Jordan, Thane Kindred, Riley Dunkley, Tia Misuraca, Alec Hoopes, Sam Martin, Alec Martin, Joseph Tolworthy, and Steven Hood. And, of course, tech support, emotional support, and financial support of my friends and my family allowed me to finish this intriguing study, for which they will always have my gratitude. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures .................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables .................................................................................................................... vii Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Geologic History of the Region ...................................................................................... 3 Geology of the Wasatch Igneous Belt ............................................................................ 5 Methods............................................................................................................................... 7 Geology ............................................................................................................................... 9 Zircon U-Pb Ages ........................................................................................................... 9 Unit Descriptions ......................................................................................................... 11 Little Cottonwood Stock ........................................................................................... 12 White Pine Intrusion ................................................................................................. 17 Red Pine Porphyry .................................................................................................... 23 Pebble Dikes and Breccia Pipe ................................................................................. 24 Rhyolite Dikes .......................................................................................................... 29 Geochemistry ................................................................................................................ 31 Discussion ......................................................................................................................... 34 Origin and Evolution of the Magmatic Units ............................................................... 34 Tectonic Setting ........................................................................................................ 34 Origin of the White Pine and Red Pine Units ........................................................... 38 Y and the “Adakitic” Signature ................................................................................ 39 iv Rhyolite Dikes .......................................................................................................... 41 Construction of the Pluton ............................................................................................ 42 Evidence for Venting .................................................................................................... 43 Molybdenum-Tungsten Mineralization ........................................................................ 45 Connection to the East Traverse Mountain Landslide .................................................. 51 Pebble Dike Evidence Supporting the Landslide Hypothesis................................... 51 Possible Alteration Contribution to the East Traverse Mountain Landslide ............ 52 Sequence of Events ....................................................................................................... 53 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 55 References Cited ............................................................................................................... 57 Appendices ........................................................................................................................ 65 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Geologic map of the Little Cottonwood Stock and East Traverse Mountains ................ 2 Figure 2. Geologic index
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Little Cottonwood and the Wasatch Fault 1
    Running head: Little Cottonwood and the Wasatch fault 1 Grading Rubric – Total Points: 100 Include this rubric. Points Library Research – Works Cited Page - APA style; relevant content; college-level sources; websites not allowed – /20 sources must be articles, books, or documents. Site Visit - Field Observations Form - hand written in field, fully completed. /10 - Photos - 6 of your own photos, 2 per page, descriptive photo captions in complete sentences, photos are original and show relevant geologic features. Photos /10 copied from the internet will result in a grade of zero for the assignment. - Map – Your own final hand-drawn map of the site showing geologic features, includes title, north arrow, scale bar, legend of all map elements; use color, show /10 location of photos, show location of relevant geologic features and label them, show human features like roads and trails. This has to be a neat hand drawn map of the park. Final Report - Three-page research paper - Content - Relevant observations and explanations of geologic features, good relationship between your observations and the results of your library research. /20 Scientifically relevant physical geologic features. Show relationship between geologic features to your observations. - Writing style - Research report style that is objective, cites references, and is concise, direct, organized, and structured. Will be free of grammatical and spelling /20 errors. Topic sentences for each paragraph, all sentences in paragraphs relate to main point of paragraph. - In-Text Citations:
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology and Water Quality of an Urban Stream Reach in the Great Basin—Little Cottonwood Creek Near Salt Lake City, Utah, Water Years 1999–2000
    Hydrology and Water Quality of an Urban Stream Reach in the Great Basin—Little Cottonwood Creek near Salt Lake City, Utah, Water Years 1999–2000 Water-Resources Investigations Report 02–4276 112 ∞ 111∞ River Bear Bear IDAHO Lake 42∞ UTAH WYOMING River W ASATCH Bear Bear W Great eber Salt RANGE Lake River 41∞ River UINTA MOUNTAINS Salt Lake City Jor OQUIRRH MOUNTAINS dan River River Provo Strawberry Reservoir Utah Lake IDAHO Spanish WYOMING 40∞ Salt Lake F City ork UTAH U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Water-Quality Assessment Program Hydrology and Water Quality of an Urban Stream Reach in the Great Basin—Little Cottonwood Creek near Salt Lake City, Utah, Water Years 1999-2000 By Steven J. Gerner and Kidd M. Waddell U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 02-4276 NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Salt Lake City, Utah 2003 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey District Chief Branch of Information Services U.S. Geological Survey Building 810 2329 WestOrton OrtonCircle Circle Box 25286, Federal Center Salt Lake City, Utah 84119 Denver, CO 80225-0286 http://ut.water.usgs.gov FOREWORD The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is committed to serve the Nation with accurate and timely scientific information that helps enhance and protect the overall quality of life, and facilitates effective management of water, biological, energy, and mineral resources (http://www.usgs.gov/).
    [Show full text]
  • APRIL 2016 Ramblerthe the Monthly Publication of the Wasatch Mountain Club
    APRIL 2016 RamblerTHE The Monthly Publication of The Wasatch Mountain Club VOLUME 95 NUMBER 4 Wasatch Mountain Club 2016- 2017 PRESIDENT Julie Kilgore 801-244-3323 [email protected] VICE PRESIDENT Brad Yates 801-278-2423 [email protected] TREASURERS Jason Anderson 205-532-3003 [email protected] Dave Rabiger 801-964-8190 [email protected] SECRETARY Barbara Boehme 801-633-1583 [email protected] BIKING CO-DIRECTORS Cindy Crass 801-803-1336 [email protected] Carrie Clark 801-931-4379 [email protected] Chris Winter 801-384-0973 [email protected] MOUNTAIN BIKING COORDINATOR Greg Libecci 801-699-1999 [email protected] BOATING CO-DIRECTORS Aymara Jimenez 435-764-4496 [email protected] Katrina Easton [email protected] BOATING EQUIPMENT CO-COORDINATORS Bret Mathews 801-831-5940 [email protected] Donnie Benson 801-466-5141 [email protected] CANOEING COORDINATOR Pam Stalnaker 801-425-9957 [email protected] RAFTING COORDINATOR Kelly Beumer 801-230-7969 [email protected] CLIMBING CO-DIRECTORS Steve Duncan 801-680-9236 [email protected] Kathleen Waller 801-859-6689 [email protected] CANYONEERING COORDINATOR Rick Thompson [email protected] CONSERVATION DIRECTOR Eric Sadler 801-518-3676 [email protected] FOUNDATION LIASON Robert Myers 801-466-3292 [email protected] HIKING DIRECTORS Nancy Martin 801-419-5554 [email protected] EVENING HIKES COORDINATOR Nathan Gilbert 801-656-7268 [email protected] TRAIL MAINTENANCE CO-COORDINATORS Dave Andrenyak 801-582-6106 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Cottonwood Canyons Scenic Byways Corridor Management Plan Cottonwood Canyons Corridor Management Plan 2008
    Little Cottonwood Canyon Big Cottonwood Canyon Scenic Byway Scenic Byway Cottonwood Canyons Scenic Byways Corridor Management Plan Cottonwood Canyons Corridor Management Plan 2008 Project Team: Carol Majeske, US Forest Service Claire Runge, Town of Alta Barbara Cameron, Big Cottonwood Canyon Community Council Laura McIndoe Briefer, Salt Lake City Public Utilities Ritchie Taylor, Utah Department of Transportation Peter Jager, Utah Department of Transportation Prepared for: Cottonwood Canyons Scenic Byways Committee Prepared by: Fehr & Peers 2180 South 1300 East Salt Lake City, Utah 84106 p 801.463.7600 MGB+A 145 West 200 South Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 p 801.364.9696 HW Lochner 310 East 4500 South Salt Lake City, Utah 84107 p 801.262.8700 ADOPTED DECEMBER 2008 Page 2 Cottonwood Canyons Corridor Management Plan Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Travel Conditions along the Byways 9 3 Intrinsic Qualities 19 4 Byway Issues 27 5 Vision 31 6 Goals and Strategies 33 7 Byway Specific Plans 37 8 Implementation 65 Cottonwood Canyons Interpretive Plan Page 3 Cottonwood Canyons Corridor Management Plan Page 3 x Page 4 Cottonwood Canyons Corridor Management Plan Chapter 1 : Introduction A Corridor Management Plan is a written plan developed by the communities and stakeholders in a byway area that outlines how to define and enhance the byway’s intrinsic qualities and character. Utah is a state of contrast, where red rock gorges meet snow capped peaks. Among the most scenic and visited locations in the state, the Wasatch Mountains in northern Utah are a collection of special places that draw residents and visitors in quantity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Development of Wasatch Trails in Salt Lake County
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1975 The Historical Development of Wasatch Trails in Salt Lake County Clyde Brian Hardy Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons, and the Mormon Studies Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Hardy, Clyde Brian, "The Historical Development of Wasatch Trails in Salt Lake County" (1975). Theses and Dissertations. 4759. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4759 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 41 JOE THE historical development OF WASATCH TRAILS IN sadtSALTsalt LAKE COUNTY A thesis presented to the department of recreation education brigham young university in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of arts by clyde brian hardy august 1975 this thesis by clyde brian hardy isis accepted in its present form by the department of recreation education of brigham younsyoung uni- versity as satisfysatisfyinging1 hettheehe thesis requirement for the degreedeg ree of master of arts ON Y 4 cayciy Yeenjajjinj a J nrf fdehoyoscommitF dehoyos committeetee oatcu r n catC 1 00 CX 571771 gayjytay tiariattaITA y atreermerftr C atnmiiyileeceeee Mbembmembeabermbere r r 1 4 T 17 william J hafiiafewiafeew department chiirmanchchoirmanChi
    [Show full text]
  • Contact Metamorphism Surrounding the Alta Stock Thermal Constraints
    American Mineralogist, Volume 79, pages 513-525, 1994 Contact metamorphismsurrounding the Alta stock Thermal constraintsand evidenceof advectiveheat transport from calcite * dolomite geothermometry SrnpnrN J. Cooxr* JorrN R. BowtvrlN Department of Geology and Geophysics,University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 841 12, U.S.A. Ansrnc,cr Metamorphism of the siliceous dolomites in the contact aureole of the mid-Tertiary Alta stock has produced a series of isograds with increasing metamorphic grade: talc, tremolite, forsterite, clinohumite, and periclase.Calcite + dolomite geothermometry ap- plied to 30 samplesof thesedolomites indicatesthat the progrademetamorphism occurred over the approximatetemperature range 410-575 "C for the tremolite-bearingthrough periclase-bearingzones. The calcite + dolomite temperaturesfollow a consistenttrend of increasingtemperature in the direction of the intrusive contact. Consistencybetween this temperature regime and the positions of the Z-X"o, phase equilibria applicable to the progradereactions requires a minimum fluid pressureof 75 MPa during the metamorphic event. Comparisons between the peak temperature-distanceprofile defined by the calcite * dolomite data and temperature-distanceprofiles calculatedfrom geologicallyreasonable, two-dimensionalconductive cooling models of the stock suggestthat the temperature regime in the southern portion of the Alta aureole was affectedsignificantly by advective heat transfer.Field, petrologic,and whole-rockstable isotopicdata, as well as the results of stableisotope transport modeling, are consistentwith this possibility and require further that the fluid flow responsiblefor this advection was lateral to the intrusive contact. Ix'rnonucrroN of the magma and rocks (crystallized pluton and sur- primary Thereare now severalheuristic thermal modelingstud- rounding country rocks), and of the mechanism (e.g., ies that have shown that fluid infiltration can affect sig- ofheat transfer conductionvs.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciation of Little Cotton- Wood and Bells Canyons, Wasatch Mountains, Utah by GERALD M
    Glaciation of Little Cotton- wood and Bells Canyons, Wasatch Mountains, Utah By GERALD M. RICHMOND SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 454-D A study of the sequence of advances and recessions of the Quaternary glaciers and their relations to the rises andfalls of Lake Bonneville UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows: Richmond, Gerald Martin, 1914r- Glaciation of Little Cottonwood and Bells Canyons, Wasatch Mountains, Utah. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print, Off., 1964. iv, 41 p. illus., maps (2 fold. col. in pocket) diagrs., profiles, tables. 29 cm. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 454-D) Shorter contributions to general geology. Bibliography: p. 40-^1. 1. Glacial epoch Utah Wasatch Mountains. 2. Geology Utah Wasatch Mountains. 3. Geology, Stratigraphic Quaternary. I. Title. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, B.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Quaternary deposits Continued Abstract_________________________________________ Dl Deposits of the Pinedale Glaciation Continued Introduction _______________________________________ 1 Till Continued Previous work____________________________________ 3 Pinedale Glaciation along Little Bedrock geology___________________________________ 3 Cottonwood Canyon Continued Climate_________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • LITTLE COTTONWOOD CREEK Stream Survey Report
    LITTLE COTTONWOOD CREEK Stream Survey Report United States Department of Agriculture Wasatch-Cache National Forest Salt Lake Ranger District By Kate Schwager Biological Technician And Paul K. Cowley Forest Fisheries Program Leader Wasatch-Cache National Forest March 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………………i List of Tables …………...…….………………………………………………………………….ii List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………………iii Map of Little Cottonwood Creek Reach Breaks…….……………………………………….…..iv Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………….….1 Project Area……………………………………………………………………………………….1 Methods- General Information……………………………………………………………………2 Methods- Survey Details………………………………………………………………………….2 Results Reach 1……………………………………………………………………………4 Reach 2……………………………………………………………………………4 Reach 3……………………………………………………………………………5 Reach 4……………………………………………………………………………5 Reach 5……………………………………………………………………………5 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………………….….13 Project Opportunities…………………………………………………………………………….16 Literature Cited………………..…………………………………………………………………17 Appendix…………………………………………………………………………………………18 i LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1. Count of habitat type, by reach, for Little Cottonwood Creek, Salt Lake County, Utah, from surveys conducted in the summer of 1999………………………………..……. 6 2. Percent of habitat type, by reach, for Little Cottonwood Creek, Salt Lake County, Utah, from surveys conducted 2in the summer of 1999……………………………………… 6 3. Count of habitat area (m ), by reach, for Little Cottonwood Creek, Salt Lake County, Utah, from surveys conducted2
    [Show full text]
  • NR Salt-Lake-County James-A-And
    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Muir, James A and Janet, House Salt Lake, Utah Name of Property County and State ______________________________________________________________________________ 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that this property is: entered in the National Register determined eligible for the National Register determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain:) _____________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action ____________________________________________________________________________ 5. Classification Ownership of Property (Check as many boxes as apply.) Private: Public – Local X Public – State Public – Federal Category of Property (Check only one box.) Building(s) X District Site Structure Object Sections 1-6 page 2 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Muir, James A and Janet, House Salt Lake, Utah Name of Property County and State Number of Resources within Property (Do not include previously listed resources in the count) Contributing Noncontributing _____1_______ _____1_______ buildings _____ _ ____ _____________ sites _____ _______ ____ ___ __ structures _____ _______ _____________ objects _____1 _ ____ ______1 ______ Total Number
    [Show full text]
  • DECEMBER 2018 (Continued from Previous Page)
    14 12 number ISSUE 160 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS President’s Message . 1 Happy Holidays! Membership Report . .. 2 I hope each of us are filled with National News . 3 gratitude in our circumstances regardless Announcements . .4 Monument Trek . 5 of our circumstances. I am grateful for Pioneer Stories . 6 our great Pioneer heritage, and those National Calendar . 8 who sacrificed for us and for generations Chapter News . 9 unknown. It has been a banner year for Boulder Dam . 9 Box Elder . 10 SUP. We are making great strides with Cedar City . 10 our Magazine, on-line chapter, and our Cotton Mission . 11 library. I’m proud to announce that Holladay . .11 Hurricane . 12 our library is officially a Family Search Jordan River Temple . 13 Affiliate Library with access to all the Maple Mtn . 13 copyright materials and records not available through any other Pioneer Heritage . 14 source. But with great power comes great responsibility. We are Porter Rockwell . 15 Red Rocks . 15 asking for volunteers to help run the library, so if you have a desire, Salt Lake . 15 you're called to the work. Simply call us at 801-484-4441 if you can Sevier . 16 give a few hours. Thanks go out to John and Diane Smith for all their Taylorsville . 16 great efforts! Temple Quarry . 17 Timpanogos . 18 National SUP has reprinted the Mexican Colonies Issue of the Brigham's Ball . 19 Pioneer Magazine because of the demand. Kathy and I are giving Legacy Society . 20 each of our siblings and our children, subscriptions to the ‘Pioneer ‘ Do Something Monumental .
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Purpose and Need Chapter
    Draft Purpose and Need Chapter Little Cottonwood Canyon Environmental Impact Statement Wasatch Boulevard to Alta Lead agency: Utah Department of Transportation May 4, 2020 This page is intentionally blank. Contents Chapter 1: Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.1.1 Description of the Transportation Needs Assessment Study Area ....................................... 1-5 1.1.2 Background of the S.R. 210 Project ...................................................................................... 1-7 1.2 Summary of Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................... 1-9 1.2.1 Purpose of the Project ........................................................................................................... 1-9 1.2.2 Need for the Project ............................................................................................................. 1-10 1.3 Regional Transportation Planning .................................................................................................... 1-11 1.4 Need for the Project .......................................................................................................................... 1-13 1.4.1 Planning for Future Conditions ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wasatch Range the Wasatch Range Truly Offers Incredible Recreational Possibilities in the Heart of the Rocky Mountains of Utah
    TM most practical multi-pitch solution v1.0 Wasatch Range The Wasatch Range truly offers incredible recreational possibilities in the heart of the Rocky Mountains of Utah. The Wasatch mountains rise to elevations of more than 11,000 feet and stretch for 200 miles from the Northern Utah border to Nephi, just south of Provo. From deep backcountry powder to mind-blowing mountain biking trails and exceptional rock and ice climbing, it is no surprise that outdoor enthusiasts from all over the US visit and move to Salt Lake City to take advantage of the climbing possibilities. The area surrounding Salt Lake City is hard to beat in terms of rock climbing, and a road trip to Salt Lake City should be on every climbers’ tick list. Located only a few minutes from the Salt Lake Valley, the Wasatch Moun- tains are home to some of the most spectacular and accessible climbing in the US. The diversity is what makes climbing in the Wasatch so special, since it is possible to access virtually all forms of climbing and a variety of rock types just a few minutes from downtown Salt Lake City. The pristine scenery of the Wasatch is equal to that found in the Tetons, the Sierras, or the Colorado Rockies. Climbing No matter what type of climbing you are looking to do, the Wasatch Range will offer some of the best routes in varied, wonderful and pristine settings. The canyons are what make these Utah mountains so special, and each canyon offers a very different climbing experience. Here is a brief description of the most popular climbing areas, and what they have to offer: Little Cottonwood Canyon (LCC) is one of the best, and most accessible granite areas anywhere, and even contains some limestone crags too.
    [Show full text]