Kamera Kaynakli Işitsel-Sanat Araci Arayüzü Geliştirilmesi

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kamera Kaynakli Işitsel-Sanat Araci Arayüzü Geliştirilmesi BAHÇEŞEHİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ BİLGİSAYAR MÜHENDİSLİĞİ ANABİLİM DALI BİLGİ TEKNOLOJİLERİ PROGRAMI KAMERA KAYNAKLI İŞİTSEL-SANAT ARACI ARAYÜZÜ GELİŞTİRİLMESİ Yüksek Lisans Tezi Serkan ŞİMŞEK (Lisans: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İletişim Tasarımı Bölümü) Tez Danışmanı: Doç. Dr. Adem KARAHOCA İSTANBUL, 2008 II ÖNSÖZ “Kamera Kaynaklı İşitsel-Sanat Aracı Arayüzü Geliştirilmesi” konulu bu tez çalışması Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, Bilgi Teknolojileri Yüksek Lisans Programı’nda hazırlanmıştır. Tez çalışmamız boyunca geliştirdiğimiz bu araç, ses ve görüntü etkileşimi konusunda yapacağımız akademik çalışmaların başlangıcını oluşturmaktadır. Uzun bir yol olarak görülen etkileşimli ortam tasarımının derinlerine indikçe, yapacaklarımızın heyecanını daha yoğun hissediyorum. Yüksek lisans tezimin bu son noktasında; çalışmamızın, artısı ve eksisiyle bize ait olan özgün bir eser olmasının memnuniyetini yaşamaktayım. Yüksek lisans programına başvurduğum günden bugüne kadar yanımda olan, tez sürecinde disiplinler arası nitelikte özgün bir çalışma yapmam konusunda benden desteğini hiçbir zaman esirgemeyen ve tavırlarıyla cesaretlendiren, her konuda bana olan güvenini hissettirerek motivasyonumu yüksek tutmamı sağlayan danışmanım Doç. Dr. Adem Karahoca’ya yüksek lisans eğitimim süresince yaptığı her şey için çok teşekkür ederim. Ayrıca; seslerin ve renklerin fiziksel özelliklerini araştırmam ve kaynaklara ulaşmam konusunda yardımlarını esirgemeyen İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fizik Bölümü Araştırma Görevlisi Muzaffer Erdoğan’a yardımlarından dolayı teşekkürü borç bilirim. Ve, her zaman olduğu gibi bu çalışmamda da yanımda olan, karşılıksız sevgileri ve fedakarlıkları ile kendimi hep şanslı hissetmemi sağlayan, bugüne gelmem de emeklerinin karşılığını asla ödeyemeyeceğim aileme, tez çalışmam süresince verdikleri manevi destekten dolayı sonsuz teşekkürlerimi sunarım. Mayıs, 2008 Serkan Şimşek III İÇİNDEKİLER ÖNSÖZ .......................................................................................................................... III İÇİNDEKİLER ............................................................................................................ IV ŞEKİLLER ................................................................................................................ VIII TABLOLAR ............................................................................................................... XVI KISALTMALAR ..................................................................................................... XVII SEMBOLLER ........................................................................................................ XVIII ÖZET ........................................................................................................................... XIX ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ XXI 1. GİRİŞ ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 MOTİVASYON ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 İŞİTSEL-SANAT .............................................................................................. 3 1.3 ARKA PLAN .................................................................................................... 5 1.4 HEDEF ............................................................................................................ 40 2. MALZEME ve YÖNTEM .................................................................................... 43 2.1 MALZEME ..................................................................................................... 43 2.1.1 Sesin Fiziksel Özellikleri .......................................................................... 43 2.1.2 Analog ve Dijital Ses Teknolojisi ............................................................. 48 2.1.3 Hoparlörler ................................................................................................ 51 2.1.4 Renklerin Fiziksel Özellikleri ................................................................... 53 2.1.5 Kameralar .................................................................................................. 57 2.2 YÖNTEM ........................................................................................................ 60 2.2.1 Araç Geliştirme Or t a mı ............................................................................. 60 2.2.1.1 Temel nitelikler ..................................................................................... 60 2.2.1.2 Nesneye dayalı programlama ................................................................ 61 2.2.1.3 Java ........................................................................................................ 62 2.2.1.4 Processing .............................................................................................. 63 2.2.1.5 Video ..................................................................................................... 64 2.2.1.6 Minim .................................................................................................... 66 2.2.2 Ses ve Görüntünün Eşlenmesi ................................................................... 68 3. BULGULAR ........................................................................................................... 73 IV 3.1 ARACIN ÖZELLİKLERİ ............................................................................. 73 3.1.1 Genel Özellikler ........................................................................................ 73 3.1.2 Görüntü ve Ses Sinyallerinin Tanımlayıcı Parametreleri .......................... 74 3.1.3 Görüntü Sinyalleri ile Ses Sinyallerinin Eşlenmesi .................................. 76 3.1.4 Ses Sinyallerinin Spektrum Kontrolleri .................................................... 77 3.1.5 Ses Kaynağının Kamera ya da Sabit Değer Olmasının Kontrolleri ......... 78 3.1.6 Kamera Kaynağından Alınan Görüntü Parametrelerinin Ses Sinyallerine Katılımında Oranlarının Belirlenmesinin Kontrolü .................................. 79 3.1.7 Kamera Çerçevesinin Alt Çerçevelere Bölünmesi .................................... 80 3.1.7.1 Kamera çerçevesinde alt çerçeveler oluşturulmasının genel mantığı .... 80 3.1.7.2 Kamera çerçevesinin dört alt çerçeveye bölünmesi .............................. 81 3.1.7.3 Kamera çerçevesinin on altı alt çerçeveye bölünmesi ........................... 82 3.1.8 Her Bir Görüntü Çerçevesinden İki Ayrı Ses Sinyal Kanalı Üretilmesi ... 83 3.2 SİSTEMİN YAPISI ........................................................................................ 84 3.2.1 Genel Yapı ................................................................................................ 84 3.2.2 Sistem Yapısını Oluşturan Modüller ve Verilerin Dönüştürülmesi .......... 86 3.2.2.1 Görüntüyü işleyen giriş modülü ............................................................ 86 3.2.2.2 Görüntü parametrelerini ses sinyal parametrelerine dönüştüren modül 87 3.2.2.3 Ses sinyal parametrelerinden ses sinyallerini oluşturan modül ............. 87 3.2.3 Paralel Çalışan Görüntü ve Ses Kanalları ................................................. 88 3.3 SİSTEMİN ÇALIŞMASI ............................................................................... 90 3.3.1 Genel İşleyiş .............................................................................................. 90 3.3.2 Başlangıç Değerlerinin Yaratılması ve Genel Ayarlamaların Yapılması . 93 3.3.2.1 Gerekli paketlerin yüklenmesi ............................................................... 93 3.3.2.2 Gerekli global değişkenlerin tanımlanması ........................................... 93 3.3.2.3 stop( ) fonksiyonu .................................................................................. 95 3.3.2.4 setup( ) fonksiyonu ................................................................................ 96 3.3.2.4.1 Kullanıcı arayüzünün boyutlarının belirlenmesi .............................. 96 3.3.2.4.2 Kamera aygıtı ile ilgili ilk ayarlamaların yapılması ........................ 97 3.3.2.4.3 Ses sinyalleri ile ilgili ilk ayarlamaların yapılması .......................... 97 3.3.2.4.4 Değişkenlerini tanımladığımız sınıfların ve nesnelerinin yaratılması ......................................................................................... 99 3.3.3 Kullanıcı Grafik Arayüzünün Yaratılması .............................................. 110 V 3.3.4 Görüntü Yakalayan Donanımdan Alınan Görüntülerin İşlenmesi ve Ses Sinyal Parametrelerine Dönüştürülmesi .................................................. 134 3.3.4.1 Kameradan görüntü yüklenmesi ve yerel değişkenlerin tanımlanması .......................................................................................... 136 3.3.4.2 Görüntülerin işlenerek kullanıcı kontrolü için parametrelere dönüştürülmesi ...................................................................................... 140 3.3.4.3 Kullanıcı kontrolleri ile görüntü parametrelerinin birleştirilmesi ve synthStore dizisine aktarılması .............................................................. 147 3.3.5 Ses Sinyal Parametrelerinden Ses Sinyallerinin Oluşturulması .............. 154 3.3.6 Kullanıcı Grafik Arayüzü İle Yapılan Mouse Etkileşimleri ................... 158 3.3.6.1 mousePressed( ) fonksiyonu ...............................................................
Recommended publications
  • Bio Information: CHRISTIAN MARCLAY / TOSHIO KAJIWARA / DJ OLIVE: Djtrio Title: 21 SEPTEMBER 2002 (Cuneiform Rune 348) Format: LP
    Bio information: CHRISTIAN MARCLAY / TOSHIO KAJIWARA / DJ OLIVE: djTRIO Title: 21 SEPTEMBER 2002 (Cuneiform Rune 348) Format: LP Cuneiform promotion dept: (301) 589-8894 / fax (301) 589-1819 email: joyce [-at-] cuneiformrecords.com (Press & world radio); radio [-at-] cuneiformrecords.com (North American radio) http://www.cuneiformrecords.com FILE UNDER: EXPERIMENTAL / SOUND ART / AVANT-GARDE / TURNTABLISM “At various moments, the mix suggested nature sounds, urban cacophony, 12-tone compositions and the tuning of radio dial” – Washington Post “An archeological excavation where whirlpool scratches, microtones and samples of thrift store-mined cheese fly around like poltergeists released from a tomb.” – XLR8R “Some amazing, static-riddled alien music.” – Dusted Start off by dispelling any outmoded notions about taking things at face value – sometimes a DJ is not just a DJ, a record is not a record, and a turntable is more than a record player. These are the basic tenets with which to enter the world of Christian Marclay’s djTRIO, especially in the case of their live recordings. World-renowned multi-media artist Marclay may be best known these days for his globally embraced film collage piece “The Clock,” but he began by redefining the roles of “musician,” “DJ,” and even “artist” itself. Since the late ‘70s, Marclay has created art by masterfully mistreating both vinyl and phonographic equipment, using them both in a manner more consistent with the way an abstract sculptor employs raw materials in the service of a larger vision. Sometimes these sonic journeys utilizing a turntable as a sextant have been in-the-moment experiences and sometimes they’ve been captured for posterity, but 21 September 2002 on Cuneiform Records happens to be both.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonardo Music Journal [1])
    IntroductIon LMJ 23: Sound Art What’s in a name? That which we call “Music” is judged by the full weight of history and fashion; substitute “Sound Art” and most of these preconceptions fall away. As recently as a decade ago the reaction instead might have been bemusement. The term Sound Art was coined in the late 1960s to describe sonic activities taking place outside the concert hall: interactive installations, listening walks, environmental recordings, open duration sound events—even “happenings” and performance art were occasionally lumped under this rubric. For many years Sound Art remained an interstitial activity, falling between music and visual art, embraced fully by neither. Many composers viewed self-styled Sound Artists as failed mem- bers of their own club pursuing “a career move . a branding exercise” (as Chris Mann is quoted as saying in Ricardo Arias’s contribution to this volume of Leonardo Music Journal [1]). Most museums and galleries, in turn, shied away from an art form that was often stunningly unvisual even by the standards of Conceptual Art and for which there appeared to be no mar- ket. (Gallery assistants often found it very irritating to boot.) By 2013, however, Sound Art clearly has been accepted as an identifiable musical genre, an art world commodity, and a subject of critical study. Its newfound visibility can be traced to a number of aesthetic, technological and economic factors. First and foremost, I suspect, is the ubiquity of video in contemporary life: On the heels of the ever-declining price of camcord- ers, cellphone cameras have brought the world—from out-of-tune Van Halen concerts to the Arab Spring—to our laptops, and every video clip is invariably accompanied by sound.
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Art As Media Art Legacy: Documentation of an Endangered Practice
    SOUND ART AS MEDIA ART LEGACY: DOCUMENTATION OF AN ENDANGERED PRACTICE by Ina Čiumakova Master Thesis submitted: 09 August 2018 Master Thesis author: Ina Čiumakova Thesis supervisor: Assoc. Prof. MORTEN SØNDERGAARD Aalborg University Standard pages: 97 pages (174, 360 characters incl. spaces) © Copyright by author 2 DECRALATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH GOOD SCIENTIFIC PRACTICE By signing this declaration, I confirm that the master’s thesis submitted by me was done, to the best of my belief, in accordance with good scientific practice (according to the Aalborg University guidelines and practice in the area), and that I am aware of and agree that the finding of serious violations of good scientific practice will be handled according to the faculty guidelines and will preclude a positive assessment of the dissertation and/or possibly result in the revocation of the degree awarded to me. PLEASE USE CAPITAL LETTERS TO FILL IN THIS FORM Full name: INA CIUMAKOVA Title of the MT thesis: SOUND ART AS MEDIA ART LEGACY: DOCUMENTATION OF AN ENDANGERED PRACTICE August 9, 2018 Date and signature 3 ABSTRACT The subject of this academic research is the documentation practice related to the interactive sound art installations and sound art environments. In this thesis sound art is analysed from the media arts perspective. In terms of preservation and theoretical contextualization, sound art is considered to be an endangered practice and this study aims to identify which elements of the practice are at risk and why. To approach the subject, first, the research aims to define what elements differentiate sound art installations and sound art environments from traditional visual art and music.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Kit Table of Contents
    Press kit Table of Contents Press Kit 2 Curator 6 Exhibition Layout 7 Sections and Wall Texts 8 List of Works 12 Artists and Sources of the Works 18 Selection of Images for the Press 20 Publication 27 Public Programming 30 General Information 35 1 Press Kit Sound Art? Fundació Joan Miró 26 October 2019 - 23 February 2020 A project curated by Arnau Horta in collaboration with Martina Millà Sponsored in full by the BBVA Foundation The Fundació Joan Miró presents Sound Art?, a question in the form of an exhibition which reassesses the notion of sound in art and considers the possibility of this aesthetic category. The show, sponsored by the BBVA Foundation, is set up as a journey tracing the imprint of the sound element in twentieth-century visual arts and led by curator Arnau Horta, a recognised expert in contemporary art involving sound. The project unfolds along five sections which address everything from the sound element as a source of inspiration for visual artists to sound art as a possible aesthetic category, the music score as a space for experimentation, the body as a listening device, and silence as a discursive and conceptual element. Sound Art? gathers seventy pieces, including paintings, prints, drawings, sculptures and installations that illustrate the ongoing, rich conversation that the visual arts have historically held with sound. The selection covers a broad time span, ranging from the late nineteenth century until today, with works by thirty-six artists from around the world including James Abbott McNeill Whistler, Marcel Duchamp, Sonia Delaunay, Frantisek Kupka, Joseph Beuys, John Cage, Laurie Anderson, John Baldessari, Tres, and Joan Miró, among others.
    [Show full text]
  • A Singularity of Noise Music in Asia and Africa
    A singularity of noise music in Asia and Africa. Ola Stockfelt points out in Adequate modes of Listening 1 that today, most industrialized Western nations are sharing a more or less homogeneous culture, which is musically dominated by "artistic music" from Europe and North America as well as Anglo-American pop music. What about non-western nations, then ? Which culture(s) are they influenced by ? Are they still maintained under a post-colonial cultural yoke ? Is experimental music, and by extension noise music, a typically western kind of music ? One has to go back as early as the end of the 19th century to discover the first Western traces of electric or electronic experimentation, or more generally music relying on noises ; they start developing at the beginning of the following century (Elisha Gray’s musical telegraph, Thaddeus Cahill's telharmonium or dynamophone, William Duddell’s singing arc, Luigi Russolo's experimentation ( Risveglio Di Una Città), László Moholy-Nagy's various experimentation for gramophones, Paul Hindemith and Ernst Toch’s own experiments, Edgar Varese, Walter Ruttmann (Wochenende ), John Cage ( Imaginary landscapes N°1 ), and many more). Music featuring noises first belong to modern art in the beginning of the 20th century, particularly movements such as Futurism (Luigi Russolo) or Dadaism (Marcel Duchamp, Jefim Gollyscheff), and will develop later on, after the war, through the apparition of musique concrète, electronic music (from Pierre Schaeffer to Herbert Eimert, not forgetting Vladimir Ussachevski, Otto Luening or Eliane Radigue, etc.), and Fluxus (a movement through which some pioneers of experimental and pre-noise music from Asia express their ideas : Nam June Paik, Yasunao Tone, Takehisa Kosugi).
    [Show full text]
  • Channelisation of Noise Through a Rhythmic Grid: Brutalist Mechatronic Sound-Sculpture
    Channelisation of Noise through a Rhythmic Grid: Brutalist Mechatronic Sound-sculpture by Mo H. Zareei A thesis submitted to Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Victoria University of Wellington 2016 Supervisory Committee Dr. Ajay Kapur Prof. Dale A. Carnegie Dr. Dugal McKinnon ii “There is no order that does not contain disorder within itself, and undoubtedly there is no disorder incapable of creating order.” Jacques Attali iii Abstract The aim of this thesis is to provide accessibility and appreciation for sounds that are conventionally perceived as non-musical or “noise”. Ordering the noise on a grid of metric rhythms, and underlining its materiality through an audiovisual mode of expression are the two main strategies employed. Using the medium of mechatronics, mechanically generated sonic by-products of technological developments are chosen as the focus sonic material. As a result, the output of this research extends what is known as glitch music outside the territory of amplified sound, to a realm where noise is created physically and acoustically. Based on these objectives, and following an investigation on the use of mechatronics in contemporary sound-based art, an ensemble of mechatronic sound-sculptures is designed and developed. Varying in terms of material, sound-generating mechanism, and sonic quality, the ensemble is divided into three different instrument-types, each of which is introduced, thoroughly described, and sonically evaluated. Next, three new audiovisual works are developed and realised utilising the mechatronic sound-sculptures, in order to turn into practice the ideas explored in this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Sound Art and Popular Music by Nathan Heuvingh
    Sampling Beyond Sound: Contemporary Sound Art and Popular Music by Nathan Heuvingh Submitted to OCAD University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Contemporary Art, Design and New Media Art Histories Toronto, Ontario, Canada, April, 2014 © Nathan Heuvingh, 2014 I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this MRP. This is a true copy of the MRP, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I authorize OCAD University to lend this MRP to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my MRP may be made electronically available to the public. I further authorize OCAD University to reproduce this MRP by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. Signature __________________________________________________ ii Abstract It is increasingly evident that popular music is utilized or appropriated as a point of reference in the works of various contemporary sound artists. Not only are artists sampling visual, material and sonic elements of popular music culture, they are doing so with an unprecedented awareness of issues within the sonic realm. To analyze the use of popular music materials in sound-based art, this MRP examines works by Dave Dyment, Laurel Woodcock and Christof Migone, three contemporary artists currently based in Toronto. In addition to negotiating critical issues in the field of sound, the artists represent the audible through various media and modes of perception. Dyment, Migone and Woodcock employ practices of sampling, appropriation and assemblage to probe popular music’s visual, material, textual and sonic composition, as well as to raise questions regarding issues of consumerism, identity and affect in culture at large.
    [Show full text]
  • Situating Sound Installation Art Since 1958 a Dissertation
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Sound Art and Spatial Practices: Situating Sound Installation Art Since 1958 A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Music by Gascia Ouzounian Committee in charge: Professor Anthony Davis, Co-Chair Professor Jann Pasler, Co-Chair Professor Adriene Jenik Professor George Lewis Professor Lev Manovich 2008 Copyright Gascia Ouzounian, 2008 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Gascia Ouzounian is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm: __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Co-Chair __________________________________________________________ Co-Chair University of California, San Diego 2008 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page…………………………………………………………………..…iii Table of Contents……………………………………………………………….…iv List of Figures………………………………………………………………………..vii Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………....x Vita………………………………………………………………………………......xiii Abstract………………………………………………………….…………………xix Chapter One SITUATED SPACES 1.1 Traces………………………………………………………………….....1 1.2 Spatial Practices………………………………………………………..9 1.3 Situated Knowledges…………………………………………..……11 1.4 Roots……………………………………………………………..……...14 1.5 Spatial Productions…………………………………………….…….17 1.6 Sound and the Production of Place……………………….……..19 1.7 Situated Sonic Practices………………………………………….…23
    [Show full text]
  • To Download a Pdf of the Introduction and Essay
    The publisher gratefully acknowledges the generous support of the Leo and Florence Helzel Endowment Fund in Northern California Art of the University of California Press Foundation. state of  i  ii 3-2 m i n d 4/28/11 3:01 PM iii  iv   v  vi 3-6 4/28/11 3:01 PM Contents Directors’ Foreword 000 Lawrence Rinder and Dennis Szakacs Lenders to the Exhibition 000 Introduction 000 Constance M. Lewallen and Karen Moss A Larger Stage 000 state of Mind: new California Art circa 1970 Constance M. Lewallen Constance M. Lewallen and Karen Moss Beyond the White Cell: Experimentation/Education/Intervention in California circa 1970 000 Karen Moss With Additional essays by Julia Bryan-Wilson and Anne Rorimer To Move, to Dress, to Work, to Act: Playing Gender and Race in 1970s California Art 000 Julia Bryan-Wilson California Art circa 1970: New Mediums and Methodologies 000 Anne Rorimer Artist Biographies 000 List of Works in the Exhibition 000 Selected Bibliography 000 Curators’ Acknowledgments 000 Constance M. Lewallen and Karen Moss List of Contributors 000 University of California, Berkeley Art Museum and Pacific Film Archive Trustees 000 Orange County Museum of Art Trustees 000 Published With the AssistAnCe of the Getty foundAtion Index 000 univeRsity of CalifoRniA, BerkeLey ARt MuseuM And PacifiC film Archive OrAnGe County MuseuM of ARt univeRsity of CalifoRniA PRess BerkeLey Los AnGeLes London vii  viii   ix 7-9 4/28/11 3:01 PM do not delete: Lewallen and Moss IntroductIon Constance M. Lewallen and Karen Moss Most of the artists who came to California in the late 1960s sought many of the same things that have always drawn people to the state: its beauty, climate, and relative ease of living.
    [Show full text]
  • Space in the Ambience: : Is Ambient Music Socially Relevant?
    This is a repository copy of Space In The Ambience: : Is Ambient Music Socially Relevant?. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/153237/ Book Section: Field, Ambrose Edmund orcid.org/0000-0003-1778-166X (2019) Space In The Ambience: : Is Ambient Music Socially Relevant? In: Adkins, Monty and Cummings, Simon, (eds.) Music Beyond Airports. The University of Huddersfield , Huddersfield , pp. 21-50. https://doi.org/10.5920/beyondairports.fulltext Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ MUSIC BEYOND AIRPORTS APPRAISING AMBIENT MUSIC Edited by Monty Adkins & Simon Cummings 10.5920/beyondairports.fulltext Published by University of Huddersfield Press University of Huddersfield Press The University of Huddersfield Queensgate Huddersfield HD1 3DH Email enquiries [email protected] First published 2019 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Images © as attributed Every effort has been made to locate copyright holders of materials included and to obtain permission for their publication. The publisher is not responsible for the continued existence and accuracy of websites referenced in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham from Microsound to Vaporwave
    University of Birmingham From Microsound to Vaporwave Born, Georgina; Haworth, Christopher DOI: 10.1093/ml/gcx095 Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Born, G & Haworth, C 2018, 'From Microsound to Vaporwave: internet-mediated musics, online methods, and genre', Music and Letters, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 601–647. https://doi.org/10.1093/ml/gcx095 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Checked for eligibility: 30/03/2017 This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Music and Letters following peer review. The version of record Georgina Born, Christopher Haworth; From Microsound to Vaporwave: Internet-Mediated Musics, Online Methods, and Genre, Music and Letters, Volume 98, Issue 4, 1 November 2017, Pages 601–647 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ml/gcx095 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular Viennese Electronic Music, 1990–2015 a Cultural History
    Popular Viennese Electronic Music, 1990–2015 A Cultural History Ewa Mazierska First published 2019 ISBN: 978-1-138-71391-8 (hbk) ISBN: 978-1-315-23062-7 (ebk) 8 Peter Rehberg, Christian Fennesz and the Label Mego Between Glitch and Bécs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) First published 2019 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2019 Ewa Mazierska The right of Ewa Mazierska to be identified as author of this work has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. With the exception of Chapter 4 and 8, no part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Chapter 4 and 8 of this book is available for free in PDF format as Open Access from the individual product page at www.routledge.com. It has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license. Trademark notice : Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Mazierska, Ewa, author.
    [Show full text]