DOCSLIB.ORG

November 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
November 2012 New York State Federation of Lake Associations, Inc... November 2012 Inside this issue: Hydrilla Found in Erie Canal Near From the President 2,5 Hydrilla in Erie Canal 3 (Cont’d) Tonawanda: Major Threat to NY Lakes Invasives Species in 3 Erie Canal NYS DEC Press Release: 09/21/2012 EPA Great Lakes $$ 4 A U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biologist recently Watershed Academy 5 discovered hydrilla, a highly invasive aquatic plant, H is for Hyde Lake 6-7 in the Erie Canal in North Tonawanda, New York. Clean Water Act 7 Turns 40 Experts attending a symposium on hydrilla in Syra- cuse confirmed the identification. Asian Clam Battle 8-9 Continues This latest discovery creates a very high threat of Western Regional 9 infestation in New York and beyond the state's bor- Meeting ders through the Niagara River and the Erie Canal DEC “No Discharge 10 system by natural flow disbursal and to many more Zones” for Lake Erie waters by recreational boating. Recreational boat- and St. Lawrence R. ing is the highest risk vector for spreading this plant CSLAPpenings 11 to other waters. DEC urges boaters to take steps to More on Hydrilla 12 prevent the spread of this and other aquatic invasive Scholarship Winners 13 species. Green Homes for 13 "DEC urges boaters, anglers and others enjoying Cleaner Lakes New York's incredible and abundant water re- News from Members 13 sources to help stop aquatic hitchhikers", said DEC Available from NYS- 14 Assistant Commissioner for Natural Resources FOLA Kathy Moser. "Inspect boats and gear for any cling- 2013 Membership 15 ing plants, mud or tiny animals; remove them, and Form Hydrilla from the Cayuga Lake inlet is the clean and dry all boats and gear. Use DEC's aquatic same species found in the Erie Canal in invasive species disposal stations, when available." North Tonawanda.. "Preventing the spread of hydrilla and other inva- Photo courtesy of Bob Johnson sive plants and animals in the Great Lakes is a pri- (Continued on page 3) NYSFOLA’s mission is to protect the water resources of New York State by assisting local organizations and individuals through public dialogue, education, information exchange and collaborative efforts. Waterworks From the President: Published by: New York State Federation of Lake Associations, Inc. P.O. Box 84 LaFayette, NY 13084-0084 Phone: (800)796-3652 e-mail: [email protected] www.nysfola.org Find us on: Officers: James Cunningham, President Helen Sick, Past-President Willard Harman, Vice-President Nearly every month we read reports that another invasive fish, insect, plant, ani- Walter Dutcher, Treasurer mal, or disease is spreading into New York State endangering our indigenous flo- Janet Andersen, Secretary ra and fauna. Board of Directors: Matthew Albright Hydrilla is on the move in NYS at a more rapid pace than anyone projected. Jack Baldwin These invaders would naturally be spreading at a glacially slow rate, but with Donald Cook mankind's help they are taking considerable geographical leaps, which is what has Rena Doing materialized with hydrilla inside NYS this year. Hydrilla has magically leaped Tarki Heath from southeastern NYS, to the middle of the state at Cayuga Lake, to western Richard Henderson NYS near Buffalo in just a few years! John Jablonski III CHECK, CLEAN, & DRY ! We can instruct boaters traveling from lake to lake George Kelley to clean off aquatic weeds, and allow their mobile rigs to dry for at least 48 hours, Nick Klupacs but with so many unattended, unrestricted boat launches, it Dean Long is merely a daydream that boaters will successfully self Theresa Mayhew Kathleen McLaughlin monitor and eradicate their boats and trailers of hitchhikers. Bob Rosati If we did not utilize law enforcement to enforce speed limits Rebecca Schneider on our roads, how many people do you think would stay Jan Shields beneath the posted speed limits? The exponential rate of John Slater movement that these ecosystem changing species are show- Robert Thill ing up is a somber predicament that requires stern, effective David Wright, Esq. measures. Staff: Nancy Mueller, Manager NYSDEC Environmental officers are now citing violators for transporting firewood more than 50 miles. It might be a successful step for the NYSDEC to execute similar regulations when boaters are found transporting All letters to the editor represent the aquatic weeds, as other nearby states are now doing. Education of boaters could viewpoints of the author and may or be enhanced. The small signs at public boat launches do not catch the attention of may not reflect the opinion of the the boaters transporting invasive species. A $1000 fine would immediately gain NYSFOLA membership or Board of Directors. (Continued on page 5) 2 Waterworks Novvember 2012 (Continued from page 1) Invasive Species and the Erie Canal When the 363 mile long Erie Canal was completed in 1825, ority for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. In response to only 8 years after construction began, it was hailed as a the discovery of hydrilla in the Erie Canal, Service biolo- modern engineering wonder. No longer regarded as gists are working with others to rapidly assess if it has “Clinton’s Ditch,” the canal allowed the transport of goods spread in that area," said Jaime Geiger, Assistant Regional from New York City to the Great Lakes and the U.S. interi- or. It also provided a pathway for the introduction of inva- sive species. As the canal system has expanded and trans- formed from a commercial transportation route to a recrea- tional one, invasive species continue to spread along the canal and into interior lakes. According to a September 2003 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Ser- vice pamphlet entitled “The Erie Canal and Introduced Spe- cies, “ (http://www.fws.gov/midwest/fisheries/library/fact- eriecanintro.pdf) aquatic invasive species now found in the canal system include: Eurasian watermilfoil Zebra Mussels Courtesy of the NYS Canal Corporation Asian clams Round goby Director for the Service's Fisheries program in the north- east. Sea lamprey DEC is working closely with federal and state partners in- Water Chestnut cluding the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Army Recreational boaters can Asian clams were first report- Corps of Engineers, New York State Canal Corporation, help prevent or slow the ed in the canal in 1998 near spread of invasive species the Office of Parks and Recreation and the Western New Lockport. York Partnership for Regional Invasive Species Manage- throughout the canal sys- Photo courtesy of the Lake ment to determine the extent of the infestation and develop tem by following good boat- ing practices: George Association recommendations for rapid response. A map showing the known extent of the infestation as of October 5th, can be Remove any visible mud, plants, fish or animals before found on page 11. transporting equipment. Prior to the discovery in North Tonawanda, hydrilla was Eliminate water from equipment before transporting. found in the Cayuga Inlet and small, isolated occurrences Clean and dry anything that comes into contact with on Long Island and Orange County. water (boats, trailers, equipment, clothing, even dogs!) Larval forms of many animal species will not be visible Hydrilla is considered to be among the most invasive to the naked eye but can be spread nonetheless. aquatic plants in North America, and has resulted in signifi- cant ecological, recreational and economic impacts in other Never release plants, fish or animals into a body of wa- regions of the country. Its biological traits enable it to out- ter unless they came from that body of water. compete native species and dominate aquatic ecosystems due to its ability to grow in a variety of environmental set- tings and to propagate and spread from fragments, turions and tubers. 3 Waterworks November 2012 EPA Announces $1.4 Million in Great Lakes Grants to Help Tackle Invasive Species in New York (U.S. EPA Press Release 10/02/12) ern Great Lakes Basin The Nature Conservancy will develop models that predict the The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has awarded $1.4 spread of Hydrilla verticillata and other aquatic invasive species million to five organizations to work on invasive species in New across the New York, northwestern Pennsylvania, and eastern York State. These grants are among 21 invasive species grants Ohio portion of the Great Lakes basin. The Nature Conservancy awarded this year through the EPA’s Great Lakes Restoration will also survey for targeted invasive species and will use this Initiative, nationwide. information to plan, promote, and develop local invasive species “Invasive species are a very serious problem facing the Great control projects. Lakes, “ said EPA Regional Administrator Judith A. Enck. “These EPA grants will help prevent larger costs and damage to Cornell University - $227,484 the environment in the future and will help ensure the continued Working with Recreational Anglers and Boaters to Prevent the revitalization of western New York’s economy.” Spread of Invasive Species Cornell will increase efforts by The grants announced for work in government agencies and nongov- New York State are: ernmental organizations in the Lake Paul Smith’s College of Arts & Ontario region to communicate Sciences - $399,891 with anglers and boaters about the Lake Ontario Headwaters Water- risks that invasive species pose to craft Inspection Program the Great Lakes and to discourage This project will prevent the spread actions that contribute to the spread of aquatic invasive species in the of invasive species. headwaters of eastern Lake Ontario by allowing Paul Smith’s College Research Foundation of SUNY to conduct a new round of water- Buffalo - $99,756 craft inspections at public boat Improving the Early Detection of launches in the western Adirondack Invasive Ponto-Caspian Fishes in Park.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Otsego Comprehensive Plan Appendices
    Town of Otsego Comprehensive Plan Appendices Draft (V6) March 2007 Town of Otsego Comprehensive Plan – Draft March 2007 Table of Contents Appendix A Consultants Recommendations to Implement Plan A1 Appendix B 2006 Update: Public Input B1 Appendix C 2006 Update: Profile and Inventory of Town Resources C1 Appendix D Zoning Build-out Analysis D1 Appendix E Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats Analysis E1 Appendix F 1987 Master Plan F1 Appendix G Ancillary Maps G1 See separate document for Comprehensive Plan: Section 1 Introduction Section 2 Summary of Current Conditions and Issues Section 3 Vision Statement Section 4 Goals Section 5 Strategies to Implement Goals Section 6 Mapped Resources Appendix A Consultants Recommendations to Implement Plan APPENDIX A-1 Town of Otsego Comprehensive Plan – Draft March 2007 Appendix A. Consultants Recommendations to Implement Plan This section includes strategies, actions, policy changes, programs and planning recommendations presented by the consultants (included in the plan as reference materials) that could be undertaken by the Town of Otsego to meet the goals as established in this Plan. They are organized by type of action. Recommended Strategies Regulatory and Project Review Initiatives 1. Utilize the Final GEIS on the Capacities of the Cooperstown Region in decision making in the Town of Otsego. This document analyzes and identifies potential environmental impacts to geology, aquifers, wellhead protection areas, surface water, Otsego Lake and Watershed, ambient light conditions, historic resources, visual resources, wildlife, agriculture, on-site wastewater treatment, transportation, emergency services, demographics, economic conditions, affordable housing, and tourism. This document will offer the Planning Board and other Town agencies, background information, analysis, and mitigation to be used to minimize environmental impacts of future development.
    [Show full text]
  • Royalston, MA
    Royalston, MA: Formal Trail Inventory Metacomet-Monadnock/ New England Scenic Trail Royalston µ State Forest Royalston State Forest Royalston Falls Reservation Tully Trail Ehrich Forest Warwick State Forest Roytalston State Forest Tully Trail Tully Trail Jacobs Hill Reservation Lawrence Brook Wildlife Management Area Birch Hill State Wildlife Fish Brook Bike Trail Management Area Wildlife Management Area Tully Trail Tall Timbers Forest Stockwell Road The Ledges Birch Hill Wildlife Management Area Tully River Coddings Meadow Canoe Launch Legend Tully Mountain Tully Trail ^_ Points of Interest Quabbin to Otter River State Community Boundaries Tully Lake Recreation Area Monadnock Trail Forest Trails Roadways Tully Lake Doane's Fall US & State Routes Tully Lake Boat Ramp Campground Reservation Other Roads Tully Dam Rail Lines Lake Trail Active Rail Service Birch Hill Dam Trails Water Streams & Rivers Birch Hill Dam Intermittent Streams Lakes, Ponds & Reservoirs Trail Inventory Status DATA SOURCES : MassGIS, MassDOT, the Town of Royalston and the MRPC. DISCLAIMER : The information depicted on this map is for Existing Formal* planning purposes only. All data are representational and are not adequate for boundary definition,Otter River regulatory State interpretat Forest ion, or parcel- IA Trail Parking based analysis. * A Formal Trail is one that is recognized by the town as a PREPARED BY: Birch Hill Dam Trails MassGIS Open Space public trail. Montachusett Regional Planning Commission GIS Department, July 2013 In Perpetuity 1427R Water Street Limited 00.5 1Tully Area 2 Fitchburg, MA 01420 Phone: 978-345-7376 None Miles E-mail: [email protected] /MRPC_RegionalTrailInventory_Update/Royalston_TrailInventoryMap_85x11L.mxd [1:70,00] 07_17_13.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Freshwater Beaches [2018]: Water Quality Data for Public and Semi-Public Beaches
    Massachusetts Freshwater Beaches [2018]: Water quality data for public and semi-public beaches The table below summarizes testing and posting information for each freshwater beach in Massachusetts. Under the state regulations, freshwater beaches must test for either E. coli or Enterococci. Most beaches do not have to post after each exceedance, provided that (1) they take an immediate resample and (2) that resample does not exceed the standard. Thus, a beach may have an exceedance but no days posted. Conversely, a beach may have days posted, but no exceedances, if it was posted for a reason other than a bacterial exceedance (e.g. rainfall, a cyanobacterial harmful algae bloom, or another hazard such as limited visibility due to poor water clarity). Single Minimum Maximum Testing Days Community Beach Name Tests Indicator Sample Exceedance Exceedance Frequency Posted Exceedances (cfu/100mL) (cfu/100mL) Abington Island Grove Beach Weekly 12 E. coli 3 236 312 3 Acton NARA Beach Weekly 16 E. coli Agawam Robinson Pond Beach (DCR) Weekly 15 Enterococci Amesbury Camp Bauercrest Weekly 10 E. coli Amesbury Glen Devin Condominiums Weekly 11 E. coli 2 261 1553 14 Amesbury Lake Attitash - A.L.S.I.A. Weekly 11 E. coli Amesbury Lake Gardner Weekly 11 E. coli 1 261 261 7 Amesbury Tuxbury RV Resort Lagoon Weekly 11 E. coli Amherst Puffers Pond (North) Weekly 17 E. coli 4 240 1986.3 8 Amherst Puffers Pond (South) Weekly 18 E. coli 4 285.1 1986.3 8 Andover Camp Maude Eaton (1) Weekly 11 E. Coli Andover Camp Maude Eaton (2) Weekly 11 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 4: County Profile
    SECTION 4: COUNTY PROFILE SECTION 4: COUNTY PROFILE Broome County profile information is presented in the plan and analyzed to develop an understanding of a study area, including the economic, structural, and population assets at risk and the particular concerns that may be present related to hazards analyzed later in this plan (e.g., low lying areas prone to flooding or a high percentage of vulnerable persons in an area). This profile provides general information for Broome County (physical setting, population and demographics, general building stock, and land use and population trends) and critical facilities located within the County. GENERAL INFORMATION Broome County is a rural community located within the south-central part or “Southern Tier” of New York State. The Southern Tier is a geographical term that refers to the counties of New York State that lie west of the Catskill Mountains, along the northern border of Pennsylvania. Broome County lies directly west of Delaware County, 137 miles southwest of Albany and approximately 177 miles northwest of New York City. Broome County occupies approximately 715 square miles and has a population of approximately 199,031 (U.S. Census, 2011). Broome County is one of the 62 counties in New York State and is comprised of one city, sixteen towns, seven villages and many hamlets. The City of Binghamton is the County seat and is located at the confluence of the Susquehanna and Chenango Rivers. The City of Binghamton is part of the “Triple Cities,” which also includes the Villages of Endicott and Johnson City. With two Interstates and a major state route intersecting in the City of Binghamton, the area is the crossroads of the Southern Tier.
    [Show full text]
  • Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy
    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy Introduction Brook Trout symbolize healthy waters because they rely on clean, cold stream habitat and are sensitive to rising stream temperatures, thereby serving as an aquatic version of a “canary in a coal mine”. Brook Trout are also highly prized by recreational anglers and have been designated as the state fish in many eastern states. They are an essential part of the headwater stream ecosystem, an important part of the upper watershed’s natural heritage and a valuable recreational resource. Land trusts in West Virginia, New York and Virginia have found that the possibility of restoring Brook Trout to local streams can act as a motivator for private landowners to take conservation actions, whether it is installing a fence that will exclude livestock from a waterway or putting their land under a conservation easement. The decline of Brook Trout serves as a warning about the health of local waterways and the lands draining to them. More than a century of declining Brook Trout populations has led to lost economic revenue and recreational fishing opportunities in the Bay’s headwaters. Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy: Brook Trout March 16, 2015 - DRAFT I. Goal, Outcome and Baseline This management strategy identifies approaches for achieving the following goal and outcome: Vital Habitats Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. Brook Trout Outcome: Restore and sustain naturally reproducing Brook Trout populations in Chesapeake Bay headwater streams, with an eight percent increase in occupied habitat by 2025.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Names
    GEOGRAPHIC NAMES CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES ? REVISED TO JANUARY, 1911 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 PREPARED FOR USE IN THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOGRAPHIC BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C, JANUARY, 1911 ) CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. The following list of geographic names includes all decisions on spelling rendered by the United States Geographic Board to and including December 7, 1910. Adopted forms are shown by bold-face type, rejected forms by italic, and revisions of previous decisions by an asterisk (*). Aalplaus ; see Alplaus. Acoma; township, McLeod County, Minn. Abagadasset; point, Kennebec River, Saga- (Not Aconia.) dahoc County, Me. (Not Abagadusset. AQores ; see Azores. Abatan; river, southwest part of Bohol, Acquasco; see Aquaseo. discharging into Maribojoc Bay. (Not Acquia; see Aquia. Abalan nor Abalon.) Acworth; railroad station and town, Cobb Aberjona; river, IVIiddlesex County, Mass. County, Ga. (Not Ackworth.) (Not Abbajona.) Adam; island, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester Abino; point, in Canada, near east end of County, Md. (Not Adam's nor Adams.) Lake Erie. (Not Abineau nor Albino.) Adams; creek, Chatham County, Ga. (Not Aboite; railroad station, Allen County, Adams's.) Ind. (Not Aboit.) Adams; township. Warren County, Ind. AJjoo-shehr ; see Bushire. (Not J. Q. Adams.) Abookeer; AhouJcir; see Abukir. Adam's Creek; see Cunningham. Ahou Hamad; see Abu Hamed. Adams Fall; ledge in New Haven Harbor, Fall.) Abram ; creek in Grant and Mineral Coun- Conn. (Not Adam's ties, W. Va. (Not Abraham.) Adel; see Somali. Abram; see Shimmo. Adelina; town, Calvert County, Md. (Not Abruad ; see Riad. Adalina.) Absaroka; range of mountains in and near Aderhold; ferry over Chattahoochee River, Yellowstone National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • HEP Habitat Status Report 2001.Pdf
    New York/New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program Habitat Workgroup ;1 regional partnership of federal, state, interstate, and local agencies, citizens, and scientists working together to protect and restore the habitat and living resources of the estuary, its tributaries, and the New York/Nc•F]ersey Bight City of New York/Parks & Recreation Natural Resources Group Rudolph W. Giuliani, Maym Henry J. Stem, Commissioner Marc A. Matsil, Chief, Natllfal Resources Group Chair, Habitat Workgroup, NY/NJ Harbor Estuary Program Status Report Sponsors National Pish and Wildlife Foundation City of New York/Parks & Recreation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection The Port Authority of New York & New Jersey City Parks Foundation HydroQual, Inc. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. Lawler, Matusky & Skelly Engineers, LLP This document is approved by the New York/New Jersey Harbor Estuary Prowam Policr Committee. The Policy Committee's membership includes the U.S. linvironmental Protection !lgency, U.S. ,lrmr Corps of!ingineers, New York State Department of nnvimnmental Conservation, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, New York Local Government Representative (New York C'i~1· Dep;~rtment of Enl'imnmentnl Protection), Newjcrsey lJ>enl Government Rcpresentati1·e (Newark V?atershed Conservation and De,·elopment Corporation), and a Rcprcsent;JtiFe of the Citizens/Scientific and Technical Advisory Committees. Funds for this project were pnwided through settlement funds from the National Pish and \Vildlif(: Foundation. April 2001 Cover: Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis). North Brother Island. Bronx Opposite: Pelham Bay Park, Bronx New York/New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program Habitat Workgroup 2001 Status Report Table of Contents 4 Introduction 8 Section 1: Acquisition and Restoration Priorities 9 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds Within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
    Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Appendix Table I. Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay watershed that have a priority score ≥ 0.79. HUC 12 Priority HUC 12 Code HUC 12 Name Score Classification 020501060202 Millstone Creek-Schrader Creek 0.86 Intact 020501061302 Upper Bowman Creek 0.87 Intact 020501070401 Little Nescopeck Creek-Nescopeck Creek 0.83 Intact 020501070501 Headwaters Huntington Creek 0.97 Intact 020501070502 Kitchen Creek 0.92 Intact 020501070701 East Branch Fishing Creek 0.86 Intact 020501070702 West Branch Fishing Creek 0.98 Intact 020502010504 Cold Stream 0.89 Intact 020502010505 Sixmile Run 0.94 Reduced 020502010602 Gifford Run-Mosquito Creek 0.88 Reduced 020502010702 Trout Run 0.88 Intact 020502010704 Deer Creek 0.87 Reduced 020502010710 Sterling Run 0.91 Reduced 020502010711 Birch Island Run 1.24 Intact 020502010712 Lower Three Runs-West Branch Susquehanna River 0.99 Intact 020502020102 Sinnemahoning Portage Creek-Driftwood Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.03 Intact 020502020203 North Creek 1.06 Reduced 020502020204 West Creek 1.19 Intact 020502020205 Hunts Run 0.99 Intact 020502020206 Sterling Run 1.15 Reduced 020502020301 Upper Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.07 Intact 020502020302 Kersey Run 0.84 Intact 020502020303 Laurel Run 0.93 Reduced 020502020306 Spring Run 1.13 Intact 020502020310 Hicks Run 0.94 Reduced 020502020311 Mix Run 1.19 Intact 020502020312 Lower Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.13 Intact 020502020403 Upper First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek 0.96
    [Show full text]
  • Tully Trail New Hampshire Massachusetts Shelter White Athol, Orange, Royalston, and Warwick, Massachusetts Hill M Cemetery Et Ac Om Et 9 - Mo O 0 Nadn Ck P 0 Trail
    F a ll s TO MT. TO RICHMOND MONADNOCK B r o o k TULLY TRAIL NEW HAMPSHIRE MASSACHUSETTS SHELTER WHITE ATHOL, ORANGE, ROYALSTON, AND WARWICK, MASSACHUSETTS HILL M CEMETERY ET AC OM ET 9 - MO O 0 NADN CK P 0 TRAIL 0 0 2 TO MT. GRACE 1 1 20 0 ROYALSTON WYMAN FALLS EHRICH HILL ROYALSTON RESERVATION FALLS 8 FOREST 0 0 1 3 A 0 T 0 H 1 0 0 WARWICK STATE FOREST O 0 Note: L – Some sections of trail PROSPECT HILL 1 B R ROYALSTON STATE FOREST 2 0 L I may cross private property. C 0 I 7 S 0 H 0 0 S 0 0 Please stay on trail. 10 M 0 1 1 1 1 O 0 0 N B 0 D 0 o 8 y c e H 1 0 1 0 I 0 0 1 L 0 L R O F A A D L L 1 S 0 0 0 R O East A 900 ROYALSTON 0 D 0 R 00 9 1 W O 1 STATE FOREST R Y 80 9 0 A O A 0 WARWICK A 0 R RO L AD D W S B T 0 I r 0 C O a 8 n K N WEST c F h i ROYALSTON s N h B O r o R TR o T A H NS k M IS SIO 20 0 N BLISS 1 LI NE HILL S DAVIS HILL F IT 0 Z 0 0 TULLY 0 9 0 1 W 0 1 WARWICK 1 I 1 L LAKE L I STATE A ROYALSTON FLOOD M FOREST STATE FOREST CONTROL R 9 O 7 0 68 0 00 0 0 A 0 1 0 8 9 BUTTERWORTH RIDGE 0 0 0 D S 0 0 8 AREA h e TO WARWICKTO o m 0 e 0 FISH 0 t 1 800 L a BROOK Tu k lly e B R U WMA i AD T RO v CK T e RWI E r WA R W TO GARDNER O 7 P 0 7 R 0 32 00 T L H C o ROYALSTON R ORANGE o n D Note: 0 0 l g l .
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Canadarago Lake, 2011
    BFS Technical Report #30 THE STATE OF CANADARAGO LAKE, 2011 MATTHEW F. ALBRIGHT HOLLY A. WATERFIELD Submitted by W.N. HARMAN SUNY Oneonta Biological Field Station 5838 St. Hwy. 80 Cooperstown, NY 13326 February 2012 BFS Technical Report #30 THE STATE OF CANADARAGO LAKE, 2011 MATTHEW F. ALBRIGHT HOLLY A. WATERFIELD Submitted by W.N. HARMAN SUNY Oneonta Biological Field Station 5838 St. Hwy. 80 Cooperstown, NY 13326 February 2012 Available Online at: http://bfs.oneonta.edu (see “Publications”) http://www.otsegosoilandwater.com Table of Contents Preface……………………………………………………………………………………………1 Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………………..1 Introduction…………………..……………………………………………………………………4 Geology………………………………………………………………………………………7 Land use……………………………………………………………………………………..7 Climate………………………………………………………………………………………12 Socioeconomic characteristics…………………..……………………………………………12 Municipal wastewater treatment……………………….………………………………………13 Tributary monitoring……………………………………………………………………………….14 Physical water quality…………………………………………………………………………15 Dissolved oxygen………………………………………………………….……………15 Specific conductance and pH……………………………………………………………18 Chemical water quality………………………………………………………….……………19 Major ions………………………………………………………………………………19 Major plant nutrients………………………………………………………………………………20 Nitrogen………………………………………………………………………………20 Phosphorus………………………………………………………………………………22 Storm runoff……………………………………………………………………………………………24 Stream macroinvertebrates………………………………………………………………………………28 Bacteria……………………………………………………………………………………………37 Tributaries……………………………………………………………………………………………39
    [Show full text]
  • Wappingers Creek Watershed Management Plan
    Natural Resource Management Plan For the Wappinger Creek Watershed Prepared by the: Dutchess County Environmental Management Council Dutchess County Soil and Water Conservation District Wappinger Creek Watershed Planning Committee Dutchess County Water Quality Strategy Committee With assistance from: Marist College Institute of Ecosystem Studies Dutchess County Department of Health Mid-Hudson Chapter of Trout Unlimited Cornell Cooperative Extension Dutchess County Land Use Law Center at Pace University School of Law YRDC-AmeriCorps Glynwood Center ImpAct, LLC Primary support was provided by: United States Environmental Protection Agency Wetlands Demonstration Grant Under Section 104 (b) (3) of the Clean Water Act NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Watershed Planning Grant under Section 319 of the Clean Water Act Rural New York Grant Program Dutchess County Staff for the project: Barbara Kendall, Executive Director, Dutchess County Environmental Management Council Edwin Hoxsie, Executive Director, Dutchess County Soil & Water Conservation District Dave Burns, Watershed Coordinator, DC Environmental Management Council Dalene Varney, Watershed Technician DC Environmental Management Council Bernadette Goebel, Program Assistant, DC Environmental Management Council Sarah Love, GIS Project Manager, DC Environmental Management Council Cara Stackpoole, GIS Technician, DC Environmental Management Council Meredith Hummel, Educator, DC Soil & Water Conservation District Amy DeGaetano, AEM Coordinator, DC Soil & Water Conservation District
    [Show full text]