A Review of Flea Collection Records from Onychomys Leucogaster with Observations on the Role of Crasshopper Mice in the Epizoology of Wild Rodent Plague

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Review of Flea Collection Records from Onychomys Leucogaster with Observations on the Role of Crasshopper Mice in the Epizoology of Wild Rodent Plague Great Basin Naturalist Volume 48 Number 1 Article 14 1-31-1988 A review of flea collection ecorr ds from Onychomys leucogaster with observations on the role of grasshopper mice in the epizoology of wild rodent plaque Rex E. Thomas Rocky Mountain Laboratories, Hamilton, Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Thomas, Rex E. (1988) "A review of flea collection ecorr ds from Onychomys leucogaster with observations on the role of grasshopper mice in the epizoology of wild rodent plaque," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 48 : No. 1 , Article 14. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol48/iss1/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. A REVIEW OF FLEA COLLECTION RECORDS FROM ONYCHOMYS LEUCOGASTER WITH OBSERVATIONS ON THE ROLE OF CRASSHOPPER MICE IN THE EPIZOOLOGY OF WILD RODENT PLAGUE Rex E. Thomas Abstract —Published records of fleas collected from the northern grasshopper mouse, Ontjchomtj.s leuco^aster, indicate that these mice have a great deal of intimate environmental contact with other rodents or their burrows. Fifty-seven species of fleas have been collected from the omnivorous grasshopper mouse. The range of this mouse overlaps much of the distribution of plague. Yersinia pestis, in the western United States; and nearly one-halt of the flea species collected from O. leuco^astcr arc known to be of importance in the epizoology of plague. This article discusses the importance of the association of fleas with a hospitable secondary host in the maintenance and transmission of wild rodent plague. Wenzel and Tipton (1966) defined host spe- often kill and consume other small rodents cies that provide suitable conditions for a large (Flake 1973). Hubbard (1947) described them ectoparasite fauna as euxenous or hospitable very colorfully as hosts. For example, certain hosts such as the sa\ age little brutes and miuderous little carnivores whose opossum, Didelphi.s marsiijyialis. collect a dis- marauding habits tell in their fleas, for upon them can be proportionately large number oi ectoparasitic fovuul all the desert species, fleas picked up from their species in comparison to others. Such hosts victims as they pommel and kill them. play potentially important evolutionary and of rodent fleas ecological roles by providing physical, behav- Traub (1985) credits the success adapted to arid habitats as due to the survival ioral, and/or physiological conditions ade- strategies of in the fur of the host quate for a large number of ectoparasite spe- remaining or, unattached, remaining wholly in the cies. Dissemination of ectoparasites between when ecologically restricted populations of pre- burrow. It would certainly be to the advan- ferred hosts by carrier hosts benefits the para- tage of fleas on the victim of a grasshopper to move, at least temporarily, onto the sites by providing opportunities for dispersal mouse and colonization of new host populations or Onycliomys to avoid a harsher second-order gene exchange with established populations. environment. As a species, northern grass- variety Wenzel and Tipton noted that since host spe- hopper mice are certainly exposed to a their semi-carnivorous nature. cies with large flea faunas must have contacts of fleas due to with many other host species or their immedi- This, however, is not adequate to explain the ate habitats, they are likely to acquire patho- phenomenal flea fauna that published records gens from ecologically more restricted hosts collectively indicate O. leucogaster to have or their parasites and thus become carriers or (Table 1). reservoirs themselves. The northern grasshopper mouse, Onij- Host Specificity chomijs leucogaster, is an example of such an animal. Members of the genus Onijchomys In a survey of flea/host associations involved are unique among North American cricetine in the ecology of plague in the western United rodents in that they are true omnivores States, Eskey and Haas (1939) reported over (Landry 1970). The range of O. leucogaster 50 species of fleas from 30,000 small wild ani- extends from Mexico to Canada in the arid mals. They observed that all of the rodent flea plains and deserts of the western United species exhibited some degree of specificity, States (Fig. 1). While much of their diet prob- which limited them to one host species or a ably consists of arthropods, these mice will group of biologically related rodents. They National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Alleri;\ and Infectious Diseases, Rock\ Mountain Laboratories. Hamilton, Montana 59840. 83 84 Great Basin Naturalist Vol. 48, No. 1 Compiled from various sources (McCarty, 1978) Fig. I. The historical occurrence of liuman and animal plague in the United States (by county) from 1900 to 1986 (A), and the distribution of the northern grasshopper mouse, Onychomys leucogaster, in the United States (B). also noted that among wild rodents having flea's ecological needs (Holland 1958). Hop- environmental contact with each other, some kins (1957) emphasized the physical condi- degree of flea interchange occurs constantly. tions provided b\' the host in determining It is not uncommon for survey data to report limitations to host utilization. Many fleas may collection of a flea species from other than its be adapted more to nest conditions favorable primary host. Collection records convention- to eggs and larvae than to other factors ally include the flea species recovered from identified with a particular host (Hopkins various hosts in a restricted area over a rela- 1957). Benton and Miller (1979) noted that tively short period of time. As these data accu- Peromijscopsylla h. hainifer occurs over most mulate, the geographical and seasonal distri- of the range of its normal host, Microttis spp., bution of fleas on host species with which they l)ut appears to be limited to flood plains where are commonly associated are subject to anal\ - the soil type or soil moisture pro\ ides neces- sis over their entire range. Stark (1986) has sary reciuirements. Other flea species are cli- pointed out the difficulty of establishing reli- matically restricted, and climate changes with able terminology to describe host associa- altitude (Barnes et al. 1977, Wenzel and Tip- tions. He suggests use of the terms "primary, ton 1966). "secondary," and "accidental" as used by Hol- Buffer (1965) described several types of land (1964), but notes the freciuent use of burrows constructed by O. leucogaster in a "major" and "principal" as ec^uivalent terms. test arena but (juoted Bailey and Sperr\' (1929) Collection of a flea from other than its pri- as stating that it is ({uestionable whether they mary host can be interpreted in two ways. dig their own burrows, use abandoned bur- Either the flea is physically and/or physiologi- rows, or use those of their prey. Bailey (1931) cally adapted to one species of host by specific felt that they occupied an\ burrow found habitat or blood-meal re(juirements (e.g., abandoned or from w Inch the\ could e\ ict the SpilopsijUns rauictili on Onict(>l(i<iiis cit- owner. If the host en\ ironment is a primary niculiis [Rothschild 1965J), and records from factor in determining host suitability, then other hosts are temporary associations; or the grasshopper mice could satisfy some of the flea and the host depend on similar ecological needs of many flea species by inhabiting the re(juirements, and host ranges overlap in such burrow from which the fleas were acciuired. a way that more than one species satisfies the The flea collection data presented in Table 1 ) ') January 1988 THOMAS; Grasshopper Mouse Fleas 85 Table 1. Species of fleas collected from Oiujcliomys spp., their noniial hosts', location of collection (city, county, state), and collection reference. AnomiopsyUus amphibohis (Neotoma, Pcromysnis and other rodent genera-nest flea) Caliente, Lincoln, Nevada (Barnes etal. 1977) A. hicmalis (Neotoma -nest flea) (Eads and Menzies 1948) , , Texas [several], Texas (Eads 1950) , A. novomexicensis (Neotoma -nest flea) Roswell, Chaves, New Mexico (Graves et al. 1974) Las Cruses, Dona Ana, New Mexico (Barnes et al. 1977) Catallagia decipiens (Small rodents esp. Peromyscus, Microtus, and Clcthrionomys) White Horse Ranch, Malheur, Oregon (Lewis 1976)' Ceylon, Saskatchewan, Canada (Holland 1985) Dactylopsylla bhiei psilos { = psila (Thomomys) Mercury, Nye, Nevada ' (Beck and Allred 1965) D. coinis (Thomomys) (Beck , Utah 1955) , D. digitenua (Geomys) Matador, Motley, Texas (Prince and Stark 1951) D. neomexicana (probablv Geomys) (Smit'l983) D. perce mis (Cratogeomys and Thomomys) (Eads and Menzies 1949) , [several], Texas (Eads 1950) , [several], Texas Diamanus viontantis (Spermophihis) (Stark 1970) Echidnophag,a gcdlinacea (Birds, rodents, large insectivores and carnivores) Albuquerque, Bernalillo, New Mexico (Wifliams and Hoff' 1951) Columbus, [Luna], New Mexico (Traub and Hoff' 1951) (Miles etal. 1952) , , Texas Roswell, Chaves, New Mexico (Graves etal. 1974) Epitedia stanfordi (primarily Peromysciis Polacca, Navajo, Arizona (Augustson 1955) (Morlan 1955) , Santa Fe, New Mexico , Utah (Stark 1958) , Dugway Proving Ground, Utah (University of Utah 1969) E. tvenmanni (primarilv Peromyscus ' Brigsdale, Weld, Colorado (CDC 1985)
Recommended publications
  • Mammals of the California Desert
    MAMMALS OF THE CALIFORNIA DESERT William F. Laudenslayer, Jr. Karen Boyer Buckingham Theodore A. Rado INTRODUCTION I ,+! The desert lands of southern California (Figure 1) support a rich variety of wildlife, of which mammals comprise an important element. Of the 19 living orders of mammals known in the world i- *- loday, nine are represented in the California desert15. Ninety-seven mammal species are known to t ':i he in this area. The southwestern United States has a larger number of mammal subspecies than my other continental area of comparable size (Hall 1981). This high degree of subspeciation, which f I;, ; leads to the development of new species, seems to be due to the great variation in topography, , , elevation, temperature, soils, and isolation caused by natural barriers. The order Rodentia may be k., 2:' , considered the most successful of the mammalian taxa in the desert; it is represented by 48 species Lc - occupying a wide variety of habitats. Bats comprise the second largest contingent of species. Of the 97 mammal species, 48 are found throughout the desert; the remaining 49 occur peripherally, with many restricted to the bordering mountain ranges or the Colorado River Valley. Four of the 97 I ?$ are non-native, having been introduced into the California desert. These are the Virginia opossum, ' >% Rocky Mountain mule deer, horse, and burro. Table 1 lists the desert mammals and their range 1 ;>?-axurrence as well as their current status of endangerment as determined by the U.S. fish and $' Wildlife Service (USWS 1989, 1990) and the California Department of Fish and Game (Calif.
    [Show full text]
  • Complement Fixation Tests for Murine Typhus
    ice under glass seal. The animals' brains were Complement Fixation Tests removed for tissue infectivity tests and were also stored on dry ice. Tests of the tissues of For Murine Typhus serologically reactive animals and pools of their fleas aided in evaluating the significance of low On Small Mammals titers. Blood samples were obtained by cardiac By RUTH KEATON, B.S. puncture soon after capture of the animals. BILLIE JO NASH, B.A. Serums were separated aseptically and were J. N. MURPHY, JR., M.A., M.S.P.H. kept at ice-box temperature until examination. J. V. IRONS, Sc.D. Serums were inactivated 30 minutes immedi- ately before testing at 56° C. Each serum was subjected to a quantitative complement tT HE IMPORTANCE of commensal rats fixation test employing endemic typhus rick- and their fleas in the epidemiology of en- ettsiae. A slight modification of the pro- demic typhus was well establislhed in 1931 (1,2). cedure described by Brigham and Bensgton Following Dyer's report (3) on the experi- (11) was used. The result was recorded as mental infection of the woodchuck, meadow reactive when a 3 + or greater reaction was ob- mouse, and whitefooted mouse with endemic tained with satisfactory controls at a 1: 20 or tvphus, Brigham (4, 5) indicated that many greater dilution of serum. species of rodents and other mammals were ap- When a serum was reactive, the correspond- parently susceptible to endemic typhus. Spar- ing brain suspension was emulsified and inocu- row (6) recovered a strain of endemic typhus lated individually into hamsters for evidence of rickettsiae in the house mouse (.Mus musodus), typhus.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleontological Resources of the Upper and Middle San Pedro Valley
    Paleontological Resources of the Upper and Middle San Pedro Valley Robert D. McCord Arizona Museum of Natural History Geological setting Regional extension causing block faulting – creation of the Basin and Range ~15Ma Poorly developed drainage results in lakes in valley bottom ?-3.4 Ma Drainage develops with flow to north, marshes, ponds and lakes significant from time to time Early Pleistocene Saint David Formation ? – 3.4 million lakes, few fossils Well developed paleomagnetic timeframe – a first for terrestrial sediments! Succession of faunas from ~3 to 1.5 Ma Blancan to ? Irvingtonian NALMA Plants diatoms charophytes Equisetum (scouring rush) Ostracoda (aquatic crustaceans) Cypridopsis cf. vidua Limnocythere cf. staplini Limnocythere sp. Candona cf. renoensis Candona sp. A Candona sp. B ?Candonlella sp. ?Heterocypris sp. ?Cycloypris sp. Potamocypris sp. Cyprideis sp. Darwinula sp. Snails and a Clam Pisidium casertanum (clam) Fossaria dalli (aquatic snail) Lymnaea caperata (aquatic snail) Lymnaea cf. elodes (aquatic snail) Bakerilymnaea bulimoides (aquatic snail) Gyraulus parvus (aquatic snail) Promenetus exacuous (aquatic snail) Promenetus umbilicatellus (aquatic snail) Physa virgata (aquatic snail) Gastrocopta cristata (terrestrial snail) Gastrocopta tappaniana (terrestrial snail) Pupoides albilabris (terrestrial snail) Vertigo milium (terrestrial snail) Vertigo ovata (terrestrial snail) cf. Succinea (terrestrial snail) Deroceras aenigma (slug) Hawaila minuscula (terrestrial snail) Fish and Amphibians indeterminate small fish Ambystoma tigrinum (tiger salamander) Scaphiopus hammondi (spadefoot toad) Bufo alvarius (toad) Hyla eximia (tree frog) Rana sp. (leopard frog) Turtles and Lizards Kinosternon arizonense (mud turtle) Terrapene cf. ornata (box turtle) Gopherus sp. (tortoise) Hesperotestudo sp. (giant tortoise) Eumeces sp. (skink) “Cnemidophorus” sp. (whiptail lizard) Crotaphytus sp. (collared lizard) Phrynosoma sp. (horned lizard) Sceloporus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction of Mid Wisconsin Environments in Southern New Mexico
    Articles Arthur H. Harris Reconstruction of Mid Wisconsin Environments in Southern New Mexico Abundant vertebrate remains from two mid-Wisconsin cave deposits in New Mexico allow reconstruction of paleoenvironments. Dry Cave lies in southeastern New Mexico, U-Bar Cave in the extreme southwest (Figure 1). Both sites are in the ecotone between woodland and Chihuahuan Desert vegetations. During the mid Wisconsin, both had vertebrate species indicative of woodland, but otherwise differed greatly. Dry Cave had winter temperatures milder than those at the site today, but otherwise the climate was similar to that now found some 450 km to the north. Except for taxa allowed into the area by mild winters, extralimital forms occur in nearby highland woodlands or in northeastern New Mexico. U-Bar Cave probably lacked winter freezes, had cool summers, and had precipitation more evenly distributed than now. Taxa now as distant as the Great Basin occurred together with species from the nearer highlands. Relatively warm summers and retention of seasonal patterns of precipitation at Dry Cave in contrast to cool summers and decreased seasonality of precipitation at U-Bar Cave produced more extreme biotic differences between the sites than is the case now. Whether this was due to different contemporaneous climatic regimes or to chronological differences between the faunas is uncertain. The last major subdivision of the Pleistocene Epoch is the Wisconsin Age. Between ice advances in the early Wisconsin, terminating around 60 000 B.P., and a major renewal of glacial activity in the late Wisconsin, commencing around 32 000 to 27 000 B. P., there was a long span of less severe climatic conditions, the mid Wisconsin (see Bradley 1985 for age estimates).
    [Show full text]
  • Pack Rats (Neotoma Spp.): Keystone Ecological Engineers?
    Journal of Arid Environments 74 (2010) 1450e1455 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Arid Environments journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jaridenv Pack rats (Neotoma spp.): Keystone ecological engineers? Walter G. Whitford a, Yosef Steinberger b,* a USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, MSC 3JER, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA b The Mina & Everard Goodman, The Mina & Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel article info abstract Article history: The potential role of two species of pack rats (Neotoma albigula and Neotoma micropus) as keystone Received 8 December 2009 ecological engineers was examined by estimating the species diversity of invertebrates living in the nest Received in revised form middens, and nitrogen mineralization rates in soils associated with the middens. Although pack-rat 15 April 2010 middens in tarbush (Flourensia cernua) shrublands were smaller than those in creostebush (Larrea tri- Accepted 21 May 2010 dentata) shrublands, they housed a higher abundance and diversity of arthropods. The Neotoma spp. Available online 15 June 2010 middens were an important microhabitat for crickets (Gryllus sp.), wolf spiders (Lycosa spp.), and lycid beetle larvae (Lycidae) in all of the shrub habitats. There were five arthropod taxa that occupied all Keywords: Habitat middens in the creosote-bush shrubland, and 12 arthropod taxa that occupied all middens in the tarbush fi Mineralization shrubland. Soils associated with pack-rat middens had signi cantly higher soil organic-matter content Species diversity than reference soils. Nitrogen mineralization was significantly higher in soils associated with pack-rat Stick nest middens than in reference soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Pleistocene Environmental Changes on the Distribution and Community Structure of the Mammalian Fauna of Mexico
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220048614 Effects of Pleistocene environmental changes on the distribution and community structure of the mammalian fauna of Mexico Article in Quaternary Research · May 2010 DOI: 10.1016/j.yqres.2010.02.006 CITATIONS READS 51 350 3 authors: Gerardo Ceballos Joaquin Arroyo-Cabrales Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia 285 PUBLICATIONS 9,624 CITATIONS 252 PUBLICATIONS 1,903 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Eduardo Ponce Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 15 PUBLICATIONS 146 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Peces del Estado de México View project Placement of Myotis planiceps within the Myotis phylogeny View project All content following this page was uploaded by Gerardo Ceballos on 01 May 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Quaternary Research 73 (2010) 464–473 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/yqres Effects of Pleistocene environmental changes on the distribution and community structure of the mammalian fauna of Mexico Gerardo Ceballos a, Joaquín Arroyo-Cabrales b,⁎, Eduardo Ponce a a Instituto de Ecología, UNAM, Apdo. Postal 70-275; México D.F. 04510, Mexico b Subdirección de Laboratorios y Apoyo Académico, INAH, Moneda # 16, Col. Centro, 06060 México, D.F, Mexico article info abstract Article history: Biological communities in Mexico experienced profound changes in species composition and structure as a Received 22 June 2008 consequence of the environmental fluctuations during the Pleistocene. Based on the recent and fossil Available online 7 April 2010 Mexican mammal checklists, we determine the distribution, composition, diversity, and community structure of late Pleistocene mammalian faunas, and analyze extinction patterns and response of individual Keywords: species to environmental changes.
    [Show full text]
  • W:\Chuck\Documents\Agriviews\2014\Agri-Views October 25, 2014.Wpd
    For Release October 25, 2014 Rats and Mice Are Making Their Move! AGRI-VIEWS by Chuck Otte, Geary County Extension Agent Contrary to the old farmer’s tale, mice and rats trying to get into your home are not a sign of a bad winter coming. It is, however, a sign that they had a good reproductive season and the population is probably at a peak in their regular population cycle. While critters of many kinds do have a way to sense short term weather changes, they are quite inefficient at prognosticating long term weather trends! October and November is the time of year that mice and rats are busy trying to get themselves well located for the winter. When I say rats, I am not talking about that nasty Norway rat that is only associated with human structures, I’m talking primarily about the eastern woodrat, more commonly known as the pack rat. With mice you may be dealing with the non- native but ubiquitous house mouse, or one of the nearly half dozen native mice such as the plains or western harvest mouse or the totally adorable (no, seriously, they are) deer mouse or white footed mouse. Well, they’re adorable until they are trying to move into your house for the winter! In reality, the native mice are rarely a problem in homes. They may be found in out buildings but most of the time they are residing outside of structures. The house mouse, while often spending winters well outside of buildings, will come scurrying back to our structures once the chilly winds of autumn start to blow! The first step to keeping rodents out of your house is not give them a way in! Caulk up any cracks in foundations, gaps around utility entrances, even poor fitting doors, including garage doors, can allow entrance.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GOOD, the BAD, and the UGLY (Traits of Rats and Mice)
    THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY (Traits of Rats and Mice) Y¡'¡t'¢ehii Danichx≠≠'¶y¶¶ Dºº T'ºº Baa'iihii THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY Y¡'¡t'¢ehii Danichx≠≠'¶y¶¶ dºº T'ºº Baa'iihii First Place Winner of the Prestigious ASBA “Golden Bell Award” for K-8 Curriculum. Compiled and Researched by SUSAN FADLER with SPECIAL APPRECIATION to: Chinle Curriculum Center Gloria Means Rudy Begay Patrick Begay Dean C. Jackson Center for Navajo Culture and Studies Marjorie Thomas Darlene Redhair Peter Thomas Resource Specialists Will Tsosie Mike Mitchell Culture Teachers Lorraine Begay Pat Denny THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES BEST FRIENDS AMIMAL SANCTUARY THE WILSON FOUNDATION VETERINARIAN CONSULTANT Dr. Janet Forrer Copyright @ October 15, 1995 all rights reserved Library of Congress Card # ISBN ICHA 90-429-041-8 The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly Y¡'¡t'¢ehii Danichx≠≠'¶y¶¶ dºº T'ºº baa'iihii 2 A R...U...F...F... MISSION 1. Goal: To provide information to students on some of the different rodents that can cause sickness and disease. Problem Statement: The Hantavirus is a threat and prevention should be taught to school age children. During play, children can come across rodents and possible danger. Parents should be educated in the clean-up recommendations. The mouse has been used in literature. Aesop's fables are well known by children. The mouse is used to teach a moral and offer useful advice. Fables such as "The Lion and the Mouse" have been an important contribution to children's literature. Mice used in children's stories are fiction, but, in reality, most of them are to be avoided.
    [Show full text]
  • Cholla-Cactus-Garden-2000S.Pdf
    OU are now IN the low desert country OF the Pinto 2. THE DESERT WOOD RAT YBasin, A PLACE OF extremes. As summer approaches, The industrious buIlder OF thIS prickly nest is the desert the basin begins to pulsate with heat waves that CAN wood rat Neotoma lepida. It is also known as A PACK rat exceed 1150 F daily (460 C). The sea OF creosote bushes for its way OF FINDING.AND using ALL sorls OF materials IN appears LIKE A mirage OF shimmering green, AND the its nest. This sman rodent is well-adapted to areas where mountains are transformed into A hazeOF flickering blue. there is little water. It CAN derive sufficient moisture from Seldom does more than A scant four inches OF rain FALL the various plants AND see.; it eats. herewithin A year's time. Can you see the natural "armor" with which the rat protects its home? The CHOLLA joints also LINE the runway Yet IHepersists against seemingly impossible odds. The to its nest. These spiny joints protect against such plants AND animals OF the Pinto Basin have developed natural enemies as coyotes AND kit foxes. However, the some unbelievable adaptions to solve the problems cactus does not prevent snakes from reaching the wood presented by these extremes. You may also BE surprised rat dens. Several species OF snakes FEED ON these to discover the close relationships between the living rodents, HELPING to KEEP their numbers IN BALANCE with things OF the Cholla Cactus Garden. the community. Wood rats are seldom seen during daylight hours.
    [Show full text]
  • S5 Ag Wildlife Damage
    Ag Wildlife Damage Category 1C Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service Ag Wildlife Damage February 2013 Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................ 4 Wildlife Damage Management .......................................................... 6 Laws and Regulations ......................................................................... 8 Threatened and Endangered Species .............................................. 11 Nongame Species ........................................................................... 14 Wildlife Diseases and Humans ........................................................ 18 Public Relations and the Wildlife Professional ............................... 26 Coyotes .............................................................................................. 26 Deer, Elk, and Antelope .................................................................... 32 Rodenticides ..................................................................................... 35 House Mice ....................................................................................... 42 Native Rats ........................................................................................ 46 Native Mice ....................................................................................... 51 Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs ................................................................ 54 Pocket Gophers ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Hystrichopsyllidae: Siphonaptera). I
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 37 | Number 2 Article 2 6-30-1977 The ubfs amily Anomiopsyllinae (Hystrichopsyllidae: Siphonaptera). I. A revision of the genus Anomiopsyllus Baker A. M. Barnes CDC Laboratory, Fort Collins, Colorado V. J. Tipton Brigham Young University J. A. Wildie Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Barnes, A. M.; Tipton, V. J.; and Wildie, J. A. (1977) "The ubfas mily Anomiopsyllinae (Hystrichopsyllidae: Siphonaptera). I. A revision of the genus Anomiopsyllus Baker," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 37 : No. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol37/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. THE SUBFAMILY ANOMIOPSYLLINAE (HYSTRICHOPSYLLIDAE: SIPHONAPTERA). I. A REVISION OF THE GENUS ANOMIOPSYLLUS BAKER^^ ' V. ' and A. Wildie' A. M. Barnes, J. Tipton, J. Abstract.— In this taxonomic revision of the Nearctic flea genus AnomiopsyUus Baker morphological charac- ters, phylogeny, affinities with other genera in the subfamily Anomiopsyllinae, evolutionary adaptations, geogra- phic distribution, ecological parameters, and host preferences are discussed. Characters primarily associated with the male genitalia, in particular the number and placement of spiniforms on the movable process (finger) of the clasper, are used for species discrimination. A key to the males of the 15 species and subspecies is provided, in- cluding illustrations of both males and females.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment and Survey of Mammals Within the Newhall Ranch Specific
    Impact Sciences, Inc., "Assessment and Survey of Mammals within the Newhall Ranch Specific Plan Area, Los Angeles County, California" (May 2005) DRAFT Assessment and Survey of Mammals Within the Newhall Ranch Specific Plan Area Los Angeles County, California Prepared For: The Newhall Land and Farming Company 23823 Valencia Boulevard Valencia, California 91355 Prepared By: Impact Sciences, Inc. 803 Camarillo Springs Road, Suite A Camarillo, California 93012 (805) 437-1900 May 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.0 PURPOSE.............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Environmental Setting........................................................................................................................................ 2 2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Project Location ................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1.1 Landscape Linkages............................................................................................................................. 4 3.0 METHODS AND MATERIALS.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]