S5 Ag Wildlife Damage

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

S5 Ag Wildlife Damage Ag Wildlife Damage Category 1C Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service Ag Wildlife Damage February 2013 Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................ 4 Wildlife Damage Management .......................................................... 6 Laws and Regulations ......................................................................... 8 Threatened and Endangered Species .............................................. 11 Nongame Species ........................................................................... 14 Wildlife Diseases and Humans ........................................................ 18 Public Relations and the Wildlife Professional ............................... 26 Coyotes .............................................................................................. 26 Deer, Elk, and Antelope .................................................................... 32 Rodenticides ..................................................................................... 35 House Mice ....................................................................................... 42 Native Rats ........................................................................................ 46 Native Mice ....................................................................................... 51 Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs ................................................................ 54 Pocket Gophers ................................................................................. 59 Rabbits ............................................................................................... 61 Ground Squirrels .............................................................................. 65 Birds ................................................................................................... 67 Directions for Using this Manual This is a self-teaching manual. At the end of each major section is a list of study questions to check your understanding of the subject. These questions represent the type that are on the certification exam. By studying this manual and answering the questions, you should be able to gain sufficient knowledge to pass the Kansas Commercial Applicators Certification examination. Correct answers appear on page 82. Introduction wildlife damage problems can be In recent years, state and federal prevented with good livestock laws have been enacted to educate management and sanitation people about the safe use of practices. The primary aim should pesticides for effective damage be to prevent damage from control. Wildlife damage control occuring. is an area that deals with animals When it does occur, each problem with backbones (vertebrates), should be studied individually. excluding humans or domestic A pest manager should consider animals. This is a complex topic. damage severity and the The goal is to alleviate problems, recreational and ecological value not to eliminate wildlife. Many of the wildlife causing it. Species 4 and behavior; crop, season and economic benefit. A decision about duration of damage; biological when to control small rodent Introduction characteristics of the nuisance damage should be based on when animal; and legal status of wildlife the pest population is predicted will influence the choice of to reach a level at which control management technique. becomes necessary to prevent Mere presence of an animal economic loss. capable of causing damage does Preventive procedures are most not dictate control. Control level effective against species where must be balanced with cost, effort, damage can be predicted. Seasonal and value of the goods preserved. control is applied during the Damage may be obvious, but it can actual damage season and most be difficult to find objective data commonly for species that are a for a particular problem. problem at a specific time of year The pest manager should identify — coyotes at lambing time, for the damaging species, and then example. choose the appropriate control This manual does not discuss all technique. For example, traps problems and species that conflict may be needed to control beaver with agricultural production, or all damage, while a pesticide might be known control methods. A species a better choice for rats or mice. not covered in this manual is the Often, the species can be beaver. Information about how to identified from physical evidence control beaver damage is available at the damage site. Because most in the publication, Beaver Damage mammals are active at night, Control, http://www.wildlife.ksu. extensive damage may occur before edu/p.aspx?tabid=106. animals are noticed. Rubs, hair, For more information, applicators tooth marks, fecal matter, feathers, are encouraged to obtain a copy and tracks can provide evidence to of the handbook, Prevention and help with accurate identification. Control of Wildlife Damage, from Wildlife requires food, cover, the Cooperative Extension Service water, and space. Habitat must at University of Nebraska, 202 supply these needs. Negative Natural Resources Hall, Lincoln, habitat management or making NE 68583-0819 or contact the the environment inhospitable by nearest K-State Research and removing one of these essentials, Extension office. generally produces a lasting effect. Environmental manipulation may take a long time and be expensive. The economic threshold in wildlife damage control is the degree of damage that justifies control. Below this threshold, the cost of controlling a problem animal exceeds the probable loss, and control is not economically justified. When losses exceed this threshold, control provides an 5 The best wildlife damage manage- occur in response to decreased Wildlife Damage ment program is based on the density. Species that reproduce Management following principles: seasonally exhibit an annual cycle. • Most of the damage is caused During the reproductive period, by relatively few individuals, births normally exceed deaths, and not by all of them; the population increases. When reproduction ceases, mortality • When this individual(s) is exceeds recruitment, and the removed, damage will stop; population declines until the next and breeding season. A population • The people who experience change of two- to fivefold is not the problem are in the best uncommon during an average position to locate the animal animal cycle. Factors that affect and reduce losses promptly. this pattern include immigration, emigration, adverse weather, and Changes in management of the habitat disruption. The cycle is property being damaged may be most pronounced in species that needed to prevent further loss or a produce only one litter per year. recurrence of loss at a later time. Wildlife damage also fluctuates Considerable damage from wild with cycles. animals occurs directly to crops Damage is seldom a problem and livestock and as a health when populations are low. During problem to man and domestic peak years, damage may become animals. Nearly all wild animals severe and require frequent, in Kansas are native, and they intensive, control efforts. Disease provide equilibrium to the is undoubtedly a contributing environment. Managing only the factor in the decline of populations species considered to be good or under stress from other factors. endangered is not recommended. Mammalian predators respond Sometimes animals considered to an increase in prey with large to be beneficial can be equally litters and higher juvenile and damaging, such as deer in an adult pregnancy rates. Raptors orchard, squirrels in a pecan grove, respond with larger clutches. or muskrats in a pond dike. In reality, any animal can be either Weather also affects wildlife “good” or “bad” depending on the damage. When populations are situation. high, damage increases markedly during dry growing seasons. Crop Populations fluctuate due to damage is reduced during years environmental influences. Animals when native forage is readily change normal population available. For example, jackrabbits parameters to recover from the loss may or may not increase in actual of individuals. Because of these numbers during dry years, but compensatory responses, control they appear to be more numerous efforts will be less effective. In because they concentrate on good habitat, animal populations croplands. respond to removal with increased birth rate, decreased mortality, and Seasonal movement of waterfowl decreased emigration. Changes in and blackbirds often results in mortality, birth, and dispersal rates concentrations of these species 6 on ripening crops in late summer in the summer. Management and early fall. Problems associated techniques are dictated by the time Wildlife Damage with fall and winter concentrations interval. A fence may be necessary Management include blackbird roosts in for deer, while a repellent would be urban areas, and deer damage appropriate for blackbirds. to haystacks, nursery stock, and Wildlife cycles are important woodland plantings during periods to damage control planning. of heavy snow. Animal numbers normally reach Duration and season of the their lowest levels in late winter. damage determine the degree of Population reduction at this time, control needed. Protecting tree before young have been produced seedlings from deer browsing or become self-sufficient, removes may be necessary for six months not only adults, but also the young of the year for a decade, while those adults might have produced.
Recommended publications
  • Mammals of the California Desert
    MAMMALS OF THE CALIFORNIA DESERT William F. Laudenslayer, Jr. Karen Boyer Buckingham Theodore A. Rado INTRODUCTION I ,+! The desert lands of southern California (Figure 1) support a rich variety of wildlife, of which mammals comprise an important element. Of the 19 living orders of mammals known in the world i- *- loday, nine are represented in the California desert15. Ninety-seven mammal species are known to t ':i he in this area. The southwestern United States has a larger number of mammal subspecies than my other continental area of comparable size (Hall 1981). This high degree of subspeciation, which f I;, ; leads to the development of new species, seems to be due to the great variation in topography, , , elevation, temperature, soils, and isolation caused by natural barriers. The order Rodentia may be k., 2:' , considered the most successful of the mammalian taxa in the desert; it is represented by 48 species Lc - occupying a wide variety of habitats. Bats comprise the second largest contingent of species. Of the 97 mammal species, 48 are found throughout the desert; the remaining 49 occur peripherally, with many restricted to the bordering mountain ranges or the Colorado River Valley. Four of the 97 I ?$ are non-native, having been introduced into the California desert. These are the Virginia opossum, ' >% Rocky Mountain mule deer, horse, and burro. Table 1 lists the desert mammals and their range 1 ;>?-axurrence as well as their current status of endangerment as determined by the U.S. fish and $' Wildlife Service (USWS 1989, 1990) and the California Department of Fish and Game (Calif.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, June
    American Society of Mammalogists 87th Annual Meeting – Albuquerque UNM CAMPUS MAPS Hokona SUB CERIA Building MSB Alvarado Redondo Village. American Society of Mammalogists 87th Annual Meeting – Albuquerque UNM CAMPUS MAP DIRECTORY American Society of Mammalogists 87th Annual Meeting – Albuquerque UNM STUDENT UNION BUILDING MAP Plaza Level Theater Ballrooms A and B Technical Plenary, Members meetings, Mall Level Capstone, Technical (3rd) Vendor Upper Concourse Poster sessions, Refreshment Committee American Society of Mammalogists 87th Annual Meeting – Albuquerque ABREVIATED PROGRAM TUESDAY, JUNE 5TH Tuesday Board of Directors Dinner – University House 5:30pm WEDNESDAY – JUNE 6TH Wednesday Board of Directors, Continental Breakfast — Embassy (registration for board members) 8:00am Wed Board of Directors, Meeting — Embassy 9:00am-5:00pm Wed Registration and Dormitory Check-In — Student Union Building SUB Ballroom C 11:00am-6:00pm Wed Opening Social (host bar) 6:00pm-10:00pm & Continuing Registration and Check-in — SUB THURSDAY – JUNE 7TH Thursday Refreshments — SUB Upper Level (3rd floor) concourse 7:30am Thur Vendors — Lobo A & B SUB Upper Level (3rd floor) 7:30am-6:00pm Thur Welcome — SUB Ballroom A,B 8:10am Thur Plenary Session 1 — SUB Ballroom A,B 8:30-9:45am Thur Refreshment Break — SUB Upper Level (3rd floor) concourse 9:45am Technical Session 1 Technical Session 2 Technical Session 3 10:15am-12:15pm SUB Ballroom A SUB Ballroom B SUB Theater (Plaza Level 1st Floor) Behavior Genetics Biogeography Thur Lunch –On your own. Use meal plan (La Posada) or see packet for food choices. Committee meetings go to assigned room. 12:15pm Technical Session 4 Technical Session 5 Technical Session 6 Thur SUB Ballroom A SUB Ballroom B SUB Theater (Plaza Level 1st Floor) 1:45-3:45pm Behavior Physiology Systematics Thur Refreshment Break — SUB Upper Level (3rd floor) concourse 3:45pm Thur Symposium 1 - Long-term Studies of Small Mammal Communities in Arid and Semi-arid Ecosystems: Synthesis and Progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Complement Fixation Tests for Murine Typhus
    ice under glass seal. The animals' brains were Complement Fixation Tests removed for tissue infectivity tests and were also stored on dry ice. Tests of the tissues of For Murine Typhus serologically reactive animals and pools of their fleas aided in evaluating the significance of low On Small Mammals titers. Blood samples were obtained by cardiac By RUTH KEATON, B.S. puncture soon after capture of the animals. BILLIE JO NASH, B.A. Serums were separated aseptically and were J. N. MURPHY, JR., M.A., M.S.P.H. kept at ice-box temperature until examination. J. V. IRONS, Sc.D. Serums were inactivated 30 minutes immedi- ately before testing at 56° C. Each serum was subjected to a quantitative complement tT HE IMPORTANCE of commensal rats fixation test employing endemic typhus rick- and their fleas in the epidemiology of en- ettsiae. A slight modification of the pro- demic typhus was well establislhed in 1931 (1,2). cedure described by Brigham and Bensgton Following Dyer's report (3) on the experi- (11) was used. The result was recorded as mental infection of the woodchuck, meadow reactive when a 3 + or greater reaction was ob- mouse, and whitefooted mouse with endemic tained with satisfactory controls at a 1: 20 or tvphus, Brigham (4, 5) indicated that many greater dilution of serum. species of rodents and other mammals were ap- When a serum was reactive, the correspond- parently susceptible to endemic typhus. Spar- ing brain suspension was emulsified and inocu- row (6) recovered a strain of endemic typhus lated individually into hamsters for evidence of rickettsiae in the house mouse (.Mus musodus), typhus.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleontological Resources of the Upper and Middle San Pedro Valley
    Paleontological Resources of the Upper and Middle San Pedro Valley Robert D. McCord Arizona Museum of Natural History Geological setting Regional extension causing block faulting – creation of the Basin and Range ~15Ma Poorly developed drainage results in lakes in valley bottom ?-3.4 Ma Drainage develops with flow to north, marshes, ponds and lakes significant from time to time Early Pleistocene Saint David Formation ? – 3.4 million lakes, few fossils Well developed paleomagnetic timeframe – a first for terrestrial sediments! Succession of faunas from ~3 to 1.5 Ma Blancan to ? Irvingtonian NALMA Plants diatoms charophytes Equisetum (scouring rush) Ostracoda (aquatic crustaceans) Cypridopsis cf. vidua Limnocythere cf. staplini Limnocythere sp. Candona cf. renoensis Candona sp. A Candona sp. B ?Candonlella sp. ?Heterocypris sp. ?Cycloypris sp. Potamocypris sp. Cyprideis sp. Darwinula sp. Snails and a Clam Pisidium casertanum (clam) Fossaria dalli (aquatic snail) Lymnaea caperata (aquatic snail) Lymnaea cf. elodes (aquatic snail) Bakerilymnaea bulimoides (aquatic snail) Gyraulus parvus (aquatic snail) Promenetus exacuous (aquatic snail) Promenetus umbilicatellus (aquatic snail) Physa virgata (aquatic snail) Gastrocopta cristata (terrestrial snail) Gastrocopta tappaniana (terrestrial snail) Pupoides albilabris (terrestrial snail) Vertigo milium (terrestrial snail) Vertigo ovata (terrestrial snail) cf. Succinea (terrestrial snail) Deroceras aenigma (slug) Hawaila minuscula (terrestrial snail) Fish and Amphibians indeterminate small fish Ambystoma tigrinum (tiger salamander) Scaphiopus hammondi (spadefoot toad) Bufo alvarius (toad) Hyla eximia (tree frog) Rana sp. (leopard frog) Turtles and Lizards Kinosternon arizonense (mud turtle) Terrapene cf. ornata (box turtle) Gopherus sp. (tortoise) Hesperotestudo sp. (giant tortoise) Eumeces sp. (skink) “Cnemidophorus” sp. (whiptail lizard) Crotaphytus sp. (collared lizard) Phrynosoma sp. (horned lizard) Sceloporus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Papers Museum of Texas Tech University Number 265 21 December 2006
    Occasional Papers Museum of Texas Tech University Number 265 21 December 2006 THE MAMMALS OF SAN ANGELO STATE PARK, TOM GREEN COUNTY, TEXAS JOEL G. BRANT, ROBERT C. DOWLER, AND CARLA E. EBELING ABSTRACT A survey of the mammalian fauna of San Angelo State Park, Tom Green County, Texas, began in April 1999 and includes data collected through November 2005. Thirty-one species of native mammals, representing 7 orders and 18 families, were verified at the state park. The mammalian fauna at the state park is composed primarily of western Edwards Plateau mam- mals, which include many Chihuahuan species, and mammals with widespread distributions. The most abundant species of small mammal at the state park were Neotoma micropus and Peromyscus maniculatus. The total trap success for this study (1.5%) was lower than expected and may reflect the drought conditions experienced in this area during the study period. Key words: Edwards Plateau, mammal survey, San Angelo State Park, Texas, Tom Green County, zoogeography INTRODUCTION San Angelo State Park (SASP) is located about tributaries, and the North Concho River with its asso- 10 km (6 mi.) west of San Angelo in Tom Green ciated tributaries and O. C. Fisher Reservoir (Fig. 1). County, Texas, and is situated around O. C. Fisher The North Concho River creates a dispersal corridor Reservoir and the North Concho River (Figs. 1 and for eastern species to move west into west-central 2). This area is an ecotonal zone at the junction of Texas. two major biotic regions in Texas, the Edwards Pla- teau (Balconian) to the south and the Rolling Plains to The soils of SASP are composed mostly of the north (Blair 1950).
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction of Mid Wisconsin Environments in Southern New Mexico
    Articles Arthur H. Harris Reconstruction of Mid Wisconsin Environments in Southern New Mexico Abundant vertebrate remains from two mid-Wisconsin cave deposits in New Mexico allow reconstruction of paleoenvironments. Dry Cave lies in southeastern New Mexico, U-Bar Cave in the extreme southwest (Figure 1). Both sites are in the ecotone between woodland and Chihuahuan Desert vegetations. During the mid Wisconsin, both had vertebrate species indicative of woodland, but otherwise differed greatly. Dry Cave had winter temperatures milder than those at the site today, but otherwise the climate was similar to that now found some 450 km to the north. Except for taxa allowed into the area by mild winters, extralimital forms occur in nearby highland woodlands or in northeastern New Mexico. U-Bar Cave probably lacked winter freezes, had cool summers, and had precipitation more evenly distributed than now. Taxa now as distant as the Great Basin occurred together with species from the nearer highlands. Relatively warm summers and retention of seasonal patterns of precipitation at Dry Cave in contrast to cool summers and decreased seasonality of precipitation at U-Bar Cave produced more extreme biotic differences between the sites than is the case now. Whether this was due to different contemporaneous climatic regimes or to chronological differences between the faunas is uncertain. The last major subdivision of the Pleistocene Epoch is the Wisconsin Age. Between ice advances in the early Wisconsin, terminating around 60 000 B.P., and a major renewal of glacial activity in the late Wisconsin, commencing around 32 000 to 27 000 B. P., there was a long span of less severe climatic conditions, the mid Wisconsin (see Bradley 1985 for age estimates).
    [Show full text]
  • Optioservus Riffle Beetle
    Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 2 II. SPECIES ACCOUNT......................................................................................................................... 2 A. TAXONOMY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................. 2 1. Original Description ................................................................................................................... 2 2. Taxonomic Description ............................................................................................................... 4 B. HISTORICAL AND CURRENT DISTRIBUTION ................................................................................... 5 1. Description of habitats and locations of occurrence................................................................... 5 C. POPULATION SIZES AND ABUNDANCE ............................................................................................. 8 D. REPRODUCTIVE HABITS, HABITATS, REQUIREMENTS, AND STRATEGIES..................................... 11 E. FOOD AND FEEDING REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................ 12 F. OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION AND SUMMARY ...................................................................... 12 III. OWNERSHIP OF SPECIES HABITAT BY COUNTY........................................................... 13 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Pack Rats (Neotoma Spp.): Keystone Ecological Engineers?
    Journal of Arid Environments 74 (2010) 1450e1455 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Arid Environments journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jaridenv Pack rats (Neotoma spp.): Keystone ecological engineers? Walter G. Whitford a, Yosef Steinberger b,* a USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, MSC 3JER, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA b The Mina & Everard Goodman, The Mina & Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel article info abstract Article history: The potential role of two species of pack rats (Neotoma albigula and Neotoma micropus) as keystone Received 8 December 2009 ecological engineers was examined by estimating the species diversity of invertebrates living in the nest Received in revised form middens, and nitrogen mineralization rates in soils associated with the middens. Although pack-rat 15 April 2010 middens in tarbush (Flourensia cernua) shrublands were smaller than those in creostebush (Larrea tri- Accepted 21 May 2010 dentata) shrublands, they housed a higher abundance and diversity of arthropods. The Neotoma spp. Available online 15 June 2010 middens were an important microhabitat for crickets (Gryllus sp.), wolf spiders (Lycosa spp.), and lycid beetle larvae (Lycidae) in all of the shrub habitats. There were five arthropod taxa that occupied all Keywords: Habitat middens in the creosote-bush shrubland, and 12 arthropod taxa that occupied all middens in the tarbush fi Mineralization shrubland. Soils associated with pack-rat middens had signi cantly higher soil organic-matter content Species diversity than reference soils. Nitrogen mineralization was significantly higher in soils associated with pack-rat Stick nest middens than in reference soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Pleistocene Environmental Changes on the Distribution and Community Structure of the Mammalian Fauna of Mexico
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220048614 Effects of Pleistocene environmental changes on the distribution and community structure of the mammalian fauna of Mexico Article in Quaternary Research · May 2010 DOI: 10.1016/j.yqres.2010.02.006 CITATIONS READS 51 350 3 authors: Gerardo Ceballos Joaquin Arroyo-Cabrales Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia 285 PUBLICATIONS 9,624 CITATIONS 252 PUBLICATIONS 1,903 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Eduardo Ponce Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 15 PUBLICATIONS 146 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Peces del Estado de México View project Placement of Myotis planiceps within the Myotis phylogeny View project All content following this page was uploaded by Gerardo Ceballos on 01 May 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Quaternary Research 73 (2010) 464–473 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/yqres Effects of Pleistocene environmental changes on the distribution and community structure of the mammalian fauna of Mexico Gerardo Ceballos a, Joaquín Arroyo-Cabrales b,⁎, Eduardo Ponce a a Instituto de Ecología, UNAM, Apdo. Postal 70-275; México D.F. 04510, Mexico b Subdirección de Laboratorios y Apoyo Académico, INAH, Moneda # 16, Col. Centro, 06060 México, D.F, Mexico article info abstract Article history: Biological communities in Mexico experienced profound changes in species composition and structure as a Received 22 June 2008 consequence of the environmental fluctuations during the Pleistocene. Based on the recent and fossil Available online 7 April 2010 Mexican mammal checklists, we determine the distribution, composition, diversity, and community structure of late Pleistocene mammalian faunas, and analyze extinction patterns and response of individual Keywords: species to environmental changes.
    [Show full text]
  • MAMMALS of BALCONES CANYONLANDS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
    MAMMALS of BALCONES CANYONLANDS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Revised: September 22, 2008 Taxonomy and sequence follow Davis and Schmidly (1994). Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana Common [Bats Order Chiroptera Poorly documented] [Cave Myotis Myotis velifer Hypothetical] [Eastern Pipistrelle Pipistrellus subflavus Hypothetical] Eastern Red Bat Lasiurus borealis Fairly common [Hoary Bat Lasiurus cinereus Hypothetical] [Evening Bat Nycticeius humeralis Hypothetical] Mexican Free-tailed Bat Tadarida brasiliensis Presumed common Nine-banded Armadillo Dasypus novemcinctus Common [Desert Cottontail Sylvilagus audubonii Hypothetical] Eastern Cottontail Sylvilagus floridanus Abundant Black-tailed Jackrabbit Lepus californicus Common Rock Squirrel Spermophilus variegatus Fairly common Eastern Fox Squirrel Sciurus niger Fairly common American Beaver Castor canadensis Rare [Mice and Rats Family Muridae Poorly documented] Texas Mouse Peromyscus attwateri Probably common White-footed Mouse Peromyscus leucopus Probably common Deer Mouse Peromyscus maniculatus Fairly common White-ankled Mouse Peromyscus pectoralis Probably fairly common Northern Pygmy Mouse Baiomys taylori Fairly common Hispid Cotton Rat Sigmodon hispidus Abundant Eastern Wood Rat Neotoma floridana Uncommon, local [House Mouse Mus musculus Hypothetical] Porcupine Erethizon dorsatum Rare resident or transient Nutria Myocastor coypus Uncommon Coyote Canis latrans Fairly common Red Fox Vulpes vulpes Apparently rare Common Gray Fox Urocyon cinereoargenteus Fairly common Ringtail Bassariscus
    [Show full text]
  • Peromyscus Newsletter
    PEROMYSCUS NEWSLETTER NUMBER THIRTY-EIGHT AUTUMN 2004 Cover: A Deer Mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus rufinus) with a striking "blazed" head pattern. See entry by Katy Mirowsky and Brian Hjelle pp. 22 this issue. PN 38 - This issue of PEROMYSCUS NEWSLETTER follows soon after the mailing of the triennial "Genetics and Genomics" issue, and includes correspondents' entries received earlier in 2004 that we did not have space for in that previous issue. And we thank those who kindly responded to our request for information about activities in their research programs. PN is published twice annually by the Peromyscus Genetic Stock Center at the University of South Carolina. Please notice that effective January 2005 that charges for many of our stocks and materials have been increased due to greater costs of maintenance and shipping. In this issue we report progress in developing a phylogenetic tree for peromyscine rodents. We intend the tree to serve as a useful reference for all with interest in any aspect of peromyscine biology, and not specifically for systematic and evolutionary biologists (See p. 7). The Stock Center had an excellent year in 2004 supplying a record number of animals and materials for research and education to institutions around the world. Stock Center utilization over the nineteen years of its existence in numbers of animals and specimens supplied is shown in the graph on page 7. The Stock Center also provides numerous animals and related materials for in-house research at the University of South Carolina. The Stock Center is funded by grants from NSF and NIH, user fees (sales), University in-house funds and donations.
    [Show full text]
  • W:\Chuck\Documents\Agriviews\2014\Agri-Views October 25, 2014.Wpd
    For Release October 25, 2014 Rats and Mice Are Making Their Move! AGRI-VIEWS by Chuck Otte, Geary County Extension Agent Contrary to the old farmer’s tale, mice and rats trying to get into your home are not a sign of a bad winter coming. It is, however, a sign that they had a good reproductive season and the population is probably at a peak in their regular population cycle. While critters of many kinds do have a way to sense short term weather changes, they are quite inefficient at prognosticating long term weather trends! October and November is the time of year that mice and rats are busy trying to get themselves well located for the winter. When I say rats, I am not talking about that nasty Norway rat that is only associated with human structures, I’m talking primarily about the eastern woodrat, more commonly known as the pack rat. With mice you may be dealing with the non- native but ubiquitous house mouse, or one of the nearly half dozen native mice such as the plains or western harvest mouse or the totally adorable (no, seriously, they are) deer mouse or white footed mouse. Well, they’re adorable until they are trying to move into your house for the winter! In reality, the native mice are rarely a problem in homes. They may be found in out buildings but most of the time they are residing outside of structures. The house mouse, while often spending winters well outside of buildings, will come scurrying back to our structures once the chilly winds of autumn start to blow! The first step to keeping rodents out of your house is not give them a way in! Caulk up any cracks in foundations, gaps around utility entrances, even poor fitting doors, including garage doors, can allow entrance.
    [Show full text]