DOCSLIB.ORG

Thophile Gautier

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thophile Gautier THE GREAT FRENCH WRITERS FROM THE SERIES EDITEI> BV J. J. JUSSERAND THEOPHILE GAUTIER In Same Series. MADAME DE STAEL. By ALBERT SOREL. A. TRIERS. By P. DE REMUSAT. BERNARDIN DE ST. PIERRE. By ARVEDE BARINE. Others to follow. THEOPHILE GAUTIER. From a photograph by Nadar, of Paris. THEOPHILE GAUTIER M MAXIME DU CAMP TRANSLA TED BV /. GORDON PREFACE BY ANDREW LANG WITH PORTRAIT T . FISHER U N W I N PATERNOSTER SQUARE MDCCCXCIII CONTENTS. PAGE PREFACE vii CHAFFER I. YOUTH I II. CRITICISM 50 III. THE TRAVELLER 97 IV. THE STORY-TELLER 142 V. THE POET 177 PREFACE. 'T^HE life of Theophile Gautier is of peculiar interest to men of letters, especially to that large proportion of them who, like Theophile, are " polygraphes" Our ancestors more briefly termed them "hacks" and, since Dr. Johnson, or, at least, since Southey, there has been no hack so distinguislied as Theophile. His Pegasus was early broken into harness, and his biographer, M. Maxime dii Camp, like himself, is constantly regretting this bondage. Perhaps too many laments are uttered over this misfortune ; like other men, Theophile Gautier did what he could, and what it was in him to do. He was a poet, indeed, and we are asked to believe that, had the State aided him with an adequate pension, his place as a poet would have been higher, his poetic work greater in bulk, and nobler in quality. But this may well be doubted. The man of letters in Gautier was stronger than the poet ; had it not viii Preface. .been so, probably lie would have given himself more freely and with a stricter loyalty to the Muse. A writer in whom the poet is supreme, a writer like Wordsworth, or Tennyson, will take poverty for his bride, disdaining the seductions of labour which is easier and better paid. To both of these Englishmen fortune proved kind, after years of self-denial. As a rule, at least in England, the poet has been a man of leisure, or if, like Burns, lie lived by the labour of his Jwnds, Jie wrote poetry in his hours of freedom, without hope of practical reward. The circumstances of his life and his necessities made Gautier a jour- nalist ; very probably (or rather, certainly] Ju did not even possess the pittance on which Words- worth and Tennyson cultivated verse with an .exclusive devotion. But we feel a conviction that, if Gautier had been more ardently and essentially a poet, he, too, would have found or made a way by which he might devote himself to this art. The truth is that he was not a poet of the highest, the creative order. His mind was not inhabited and possessed by airy beings, who insisted on being clothed in words and sent forth to live with Hamlet and Esmeralda,with Faust and a"Artagnan, Fantine and Di Vernon. Still less had Gautier the moral enthusiasm of Wordsworth, the natural magic of Keats, the ardent spirit of Burns, and his passionate interest Preface. ix in life. Art was what Gautier loved the beau- tiful of human creation. He is thus, as Plato says, distant by two degrees from the real, and his poetry touches life only on one side. Such poetry is neither the child of an absorbing and exclusive inspiration, nor so dear and necessary to men that a poet can live on bread thus earned alone. It was therefore necessary for Gautier, especially as his tastes were somewhat luxurious, to live other- wise, by the gifts which he could make profitable, really his more especial and singular gifts, his unrivalled art as a man of letters. He could not write an uninteresting line ; he had not the art of being dull ; to lack that was the gift of the fairies ; on not being dull he lived. Consequently his genius is scattered widecast ; his "three " hundred volumes are lost in a wilderness of old newspapers, and, if we ask for a "great work" it is not, or is represented only by two slim volumes of exquisite verse ; a romance, not of the most enthralling ; a novel, which lies patent to the censure of moralists ; and a feiu sliort stories. In none of these is the human interest the chief merit and attraction. There is style, there is charm, there is music ; but there is more of life in a chapter of Dumas, or in a proverbe of Alfred de Musset. Had Gautier, in addition to his other qualities, possessed the vitality, the hu- manity of Hugo, of Dumas, of Musset, his name x Preface. would indeed be among the greatest of the great in the wide and glorious domain of French lite- rature. But this vitality, this large and eager sympathy with what is universal, Gautier lacked. No pension, no sinecure, no leisure could have given him what Nature withheld, and he is neither to be blamed nor pitied, but rather applauded, for his industrious work in his own field, the common field of letters. Here he laboured after his kind, giving in abundant measure such enjoyment as he had it in his power to give. His reputation suffers from the common and irritating " theory of the Great Work" the magnum opus. There was no magnum opus in him to give. We might as well ask an orfevre like Benvenuto Cellini to build St. Peters or the Parthenon; though the Perseus of the gold-zvorker is a greater triumph than was possible, in his own province, to Gautier. He himself was probably una^vare of his limitations, and, loving poetry well, regretted that the lyre was often hung out of reach. But, to us who survive him, it may seem that he did what it was in him to do, that he did it to per- " fection, and with unwearied diligence. He is known of his own" to quote the inscription on a miniature of James VIII. If they are few, they are loyal. Gautier s biography and his confessions prove that lie was a born student. He /tad the love Preface. xi of printed matter, he had a memory as proved by his recital of a long poem of Hugo's only once read, which rivalled that of Scott. Sir Walter repeated, by the banks of the Ttveed, a long ballad of Hogg's which had been read to him once, a ballad which the Sheplierd had lost. Gautier might have rivalled this feat. With such a love of reading, with such natural scholar- ship as M. Maxime du Camp vouches for, with such a memory, Gautier had the complete equip- ment of a man of letters, combined with the temperament of an artist. Like Thackeray, of whom his melancholy and his gaiety both remind us, Gautier began life as a painter, but the current of 1830, of Romanticism, carried him into litera- ture. He very soon began to laugh at the boyish medievalism of the Petruses and Jehans, but his life was inspired to its close by the memories of that gallant boyishness, and death found him as lie was writing an article on the well-worn theme of Hernani. For Mort aux Perruques he substi- tuted Mort aux bourgeois, and, to tell the truth, his bitter insistence on this hatred of the common- becomes becomes as place tedious, melancholy ^ we read his harangues in the memoirs of the Gon- courts. We cannot imagine Shakespeare, or Scott, or Dumas thus declaiming against the ordinary, the staple of human existence, the life that all the poets' fatJiers lived. That life, of course, is in- xii Preface. different to the finer things of art, but man teas by no means born to live for art alone, and the majority of men welcome art only when it refiects the very everyday passions and experiences wJiicJi Gautier scouted. The young lady of the familiar anecdote spoke of'him as un cerebral, and, in spite of his muscles, un cerebral Gautier essentially was. Endowed with a noble physical equipment, he lived by the brain rather than the heart. He could not forgive people who lived otherwise, and they, con- sequently, did not welcome him and his work as they welcomed Dumas, and Musset, and Balzac. " In brief, he lived in a vale',' the vale of art and " letters, and he and his fame must accept the consequences of such a situation? For this Hollow Land is remote from the actual interests of mortal men ; this realm they do not inhabit, and they hold but lightly the natives of the place. For " them the wiser policy is to take this for a her- mitage," and be content among their dreams, indifferent to what is really so indifferent, the most sweet voices of the multitude. Unluckily ^Gautier did not attain to this philosopliy. To s^ despise the general and yet to be eager for its \ plaudits is the paradox of the artist. T/ius does lie disquiet himselfin vain,conscious ofgreaterpowers+ conscious that they are not fiilly recognised, because, in fact, the light in him is not completely focussed^ does not concentrate and burn to a single point. Preface. xiii It is possible to be too Puritanic in an estimate of Gautier s wrongs and grievances. The perpetual task of criticising trash, in pictures, in books, in " plays, to write sur la valeur litteraire de pieces: qui, le plus souvent rfen avaient aucune" is, in- deed, a burden almost not to be borne. M. Maxime du Camp thinks that Gautier might have written an admirable history of French literature. No doubt he might, but did anything external prevent him from doing it ? To take a similar case, M.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • June 1962 Acknowledgments
    A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF FIVE POEMS BY ALFRED DE VIGNY "MOISE," "LA MAISON DU BERGER," "LA COLERE DE SAMSON," "LE MONT DES OLIVIERS," AND "LA MORT DU LOUP" A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF ATLANTA UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS BY ELAINE JOY C. RUSSELL DEPARTMENT OF FRENCH ATLANTA, GEORGIA JUNE 1962 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In the preparation of this thesis I have received generous as sistance from many persons, and it is my wish to acknowledge their kind efforts. I am indebted to Doctor Benjamin F. Hudson, Chairman, Department of French, Atlanta University, to Mrs. Jacqueline Brimmer, Professor, Morehouse College, and to Mrs. Billie Geter Thomas, Head, Modern Language Department, Spelman College, for their kind and help ful suggestions. In addition to my professors, I wish to thank the Library staff, especially Mrs. Annabelle M. Jarrett, for all the kind assistance which I have received from them. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ±± Chapter I. INTRODUCTION ! II. THE ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE ROMANTIC THEMES 5 III. THE FUNCTION OF THE POET 21 IV. THE PHILOSOPHY OF ALFRED DE VIGNI AS REVEALED IN: "LA MAISON DU BERGER, •' AND "LA COLERE DE SAMSON" 30 V. THE PHILOSOPHY OF ALFRED DE VIGNY AS REVEALED IN: »LE MONT DES OLIVIERS,» AND "LA. MORT DU LOUP" £2 Conclusion 5j^ BIBLIOGRAPHY 57 iii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Each literaiy movement develops its favorite themes. Love, death, religion, nature and nationalism became the great themes of the romantic period. The treatment of these themes by the precursors of romanticism was later interpreted and developed by the major romantic poets, Alphonse de Lamartine, Victor Hugo, Alfred de Musset and Alfred de Vigny.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting for France's Political Future in the Long Wake of the Commune, 1871-1880
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2013 Long Live the Revolutions: Fighting for France's Political Future in the Long Wake of the Commune, 1871-1880 Heather Marlene Bennett University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Bennett, Heather Marlene, "Long Live the Revolutions: Fighting for France's Political Future in the Long Wake of the Commune, 1871-1880" (2013). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 734. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/734 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/734 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Long Live the Revolutions: Fighting for France's Political Future in the Long Wake of the Commune, 1871-1880 Abstract The traumatic legacies of the Paris Commune and its harsh suppression in 1871 had a significant impact on the identities and voter outreach efforts of each of the chief political blocs of the 1870s. The political and cultural developments of this phenomenal decade, which is frequently mislabeled as calm and stable, established the Republic's longevity and set its character. Yet the Commune's legacies have never been comprehensively examined in a way that synthesizes their political and cultural effects. This dissertation offers a compelling perspective of the 1870s through qualitative and quantitative analyses of the influence of these legacies, using sources as diverse as parliamentary debates, visual media, and scribbled sedition on city walls, to explicate the decade's most important political and cultural moments, their origins, and their impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Students Will Develop an Understanding of the Major Ideas
    SUNY Cortland Department of International Communications and Culture FRE 417/515 Romanticism & Realism Fall 2009 Bob Ponterio 3 cr. hrs Tel: 2027 home: 756-4813 M 4:20-6:50 Office: Main 223 Main 229 Office hrs: MT 9-12, & by appointment [email protected] Textes : We will use electronic texts for shorter works. Each student will also be choosing one novel to read that can either be borrowed from the library or bought online at Amazon.com: Resources utiles: Pour acheter des livres en français: http://www.alapage.fr ; http://www.amazon.fr ; http://www.archambault.ca/ ; http://www.amazon.ca Free online versions : http://gallica.bnf.fr/classique/ Styles de peinture: http://discipline.free.fr/lesstyles.htm Course Description: We will explore how changing ideas about the nature of the world and of mankind led to two major approaches to writing literature in the 19th century: Romanticism & Realism. An examination of a number of major works of poetry, drama, and prose will help us how these two different but related concepts evolved and continue to influence us today. Open to graduate and upper level undergraduate students. For upper level undergraduates who have already completed all major requirements, this course can count for SUNY Cortland’s graduate program. Évaluation: Presentations 20% (3 short in-class presentations) Papers 40% (3 : 5-page papers; 1st draft will be revised) HW 10% (short written) Final Exam 30% Objectives: Students will develop an understanding of the major ideas underpinning the romantic & realist movements and be able to recognize and explain the elements of various types of romanticism & realism in the works that they read.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolution at a Standstill: Photography and the Paris Commune of 1871 Author(S): Jeannene M
    Revolution at a Standstill: Photography and the Paris Commune of 1871 Author(s): Jeannene M. Przyblyski Source: Yale French Studies, No. 101, Fragments of Revolution (2001), pp. 54-78 Published by: Yale University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3090606 Accessed: 02-04-2018 16:28 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Yale University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Yale French Studies This content downloaded from 136.152.208.140 on Mon, 02 Apr 2018 16:28:15 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms JEANNENE M. PRZYBLYSKI Revolution at a Standstill: Photography and the Paris Commune of 1871* Revolution is a drama perhaps more than a history, and its pathos is a condition as imperious as its authenticity. -Auguste Blanqui "Angelus Novus'1 Look at them. Heads peering over piles of paving stones, smiling for the camera or squinting down the barrel of a gun (Fig. 1). They stand bathed in the flat light of late winter, suspended between the fact of photographic stillness and the promise of fighting in the streets. It hardly needs saying that in March of 1871 Paris itself was no less be- tween states-half taken apart, half put back together.
    [Show full text]
  • H-France Review Vol. 19 (February 2019), No. 22 Colette E. Wilson
    H-France Review Volume 19 (2019) Page 1 H-France Review Vol. 19 (February 2019), No. 22 Colette E. Wilson, Paris and the Commune, 1871-78: The Politics of Forgetting. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016. xiii + 236 pp. Figures, notes, illustrations, bibliography, and index. £19.99 U.K. (pb). ISBN 9781526106582. Review by Casey Harison, University of Southern Indiana. The Commune of 1871 was the predominantly working-class rebellion that seized control of Paris two months after France had lost a war against Prussia. The Communards controlled Paris from mid-March to late May before the French national army operating from nearby Versailles entered and retook the city in a week of terrible street fighting. According to John Merriman, La Semaine Sanglante (Bloody Week, 21-28 May 1871), was a “massacre” perpetrated by the national government that left as many as 12,000- 15,000 Communards killed.[1] Historians like Merriman have written a great deal about the Commune. As with other national traumas, there have also been contests over the memory and legacies of 1871. Colette E. Wilson’s persuasive Paris and the Commune 1871-78 (first published as a hardback edition in 2007) is about the effort by conservative elements in Paris and France to either forget aspects of the Commune’s history or to remember only what they regarded as its crimes. Paris and the Commune 1871-78 is a concise work of six chapters, including introduction and brief conclusion. The book is part of a series produced by Manchester University’s Centre for the Cultural History of War and belongs to the scholarly genre of cultural memory studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Water and Wine As Symbols of Inspiration by Nb
    WATER AND WINE AS SYMBOLS OF INSPIRATION BY N. B. CROWTHER It has long been suggested that drinking from holy streams (or founts) in Greek and Roman poetry symbolized different approaches to poetic endeavour: Maass 1), followed by Wilamowitz 2) and Kroll 3), for example, believed that epic poets drank from Hippo- crene, elegiac poets from Aganippe. Yet the evidence for assigning specific functions to these streams will be seen to be rarely clear-cut, if at all. The related problem of the "debate" between the water- drinkers and wine-drinkers seems equally complex. Can we see the drinking from streams in Roman poetry as symbolic for the initia- tion of the poet, or acceptance by him, of Alexandrian, i.e. Calli- machean poetry? It is certainly a feature which permeates the writing of many of the major Roman poets, and therefore is of considerable importance in the literary development of these authors. The first Greek author to speak of holy streams is Hesiod, who names Hippocrene, Permessus and Olmeus on Helicon as bathing- places of the Muses (Theogony I ff.) 4) ; he seems also to mention a 1) E. Maass, Untersuchungen zu Properz, Hermes 31(1896), 375 ff. 2) U. von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Hellenistische Dichtung, II (Berlin 1924), 95. 3) W. Kroll, Studien zum Verständnis der römischen Literatur (Stuttgart 1964. First publ. 1924), 29. 4) For Hippocrene, see E. Sittig-F. Bölte, Hippokrene, RE VIII 2 (1913), 1853-57; for references to Permessus, cf. Nic. Ther, 12 ; Strab. 407, 411 ; Virg. Ecl. VI 64 ; Prop. II 10, 26 ; Stat.
    [Show full text]
  • Circulation and Mobility in the Nineteenth-Century Mediterranean
    History of Photography ISSN: 0308-7298 (Print) 2150-7295 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/thph20 Practices of Photography: Circulation and Mobility in the Nineteenth-Century Mediterranean Michèle Hannoosh To cite this article: Michèle Hannoosh (2016) Practices of Photography: Circulation and Mobility in the Nineteenth-Century Mediterranean, History of Photography, 40:1, 3-27, DOI: 10.1080/03087298.2015.1123830 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03087298.2015.1123830 Published online: 16 Mar 2016. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=thph20 Download by: [Michele Hanoosh] Date: 17 March 2016, At: 18:59 I would like to thank Aliki Tsirgialou, Chief Curator of the Photographic Archive at the Benaki Museum, Athens, who first called my attention to the Benaki album discussed here and assisted me in my research; Maria Georgopoulou, Director of the Gennadius Library, Athens, who invited me to present my work at the Gennadius; and Eleftheria Daleziou, Reference Archivist of the Practices of Photography: Gennadius, and Natalia Vogeikoff-Brogan, Doreen Canaday Spitzer Archivist, American School of Classical Studies at Circulation and Mobility in the Athens, who facilitated my work in the Gennadius archives. I am indebted to two anonymous reviewers for History of Nineteenth-Century Mediterranean Photography, whose comments significantly improved
    [Show full text]
  • 9. Gundolf's Romanticism
    https://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2021 Roger Paulin This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt the text and to make commercial use of the text providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Roger Paulin, From Goethe to Gundolf: Essays on German Literature and Culture. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2021, https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0258 Copyright and permissions for the reuse of many of the images included in this publication differ from the above. Copyright and permissions information for images is provided separately in the List of Illustrations. In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit, https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0258#copyright Further details about CC-BY licenses are available at, https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/ All external links were active at the time of publication unless otherwise stated and have been archived via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at https://archive.org/web Updated digital material and resources associated with this volume are available at https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0258#resources Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omission or error will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. ISBN Paperback: 9781800642126 ISBN Hardback: 9781800642133 ISBN Digital (PDF): 9781800642140 ISBN Digital ebook (epub): 9781800642157 ISBN Digital ebook (mobi): 9781800642164 ISBN Digital (XML): 9781800642171 DOI: 10.11647/OBP.0258 Cover photo and design by Andrew Corbett, CC-BY 4.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Aidan Smith 44-45 Henry W
    Who’s Inside 6 Yigit˘ Akin 7 James Alm & Steven M. Sheffrin 8 Mohan Ambikaipaker 9 Mia L. Bagneris 10 Robert Birdwell 11 Ryan Boehm 12 William C. Brumfield 13-14 Amy Chaffee 15 Michael R. Cohen 16 Teresa Cole 17 Aaron Collier 18 Peter Cooley 19 Clare Daniel 20 Martin K. Dimitrov 21 Patrick J.W. Egan 22 AnnieLaurie Erickson 23 Christopher J. Fettweis 24-25 Holly Flora 26-27 Kevin H. Jones 28 Gene Koss 29 Zachary Lazar 30 Nora Lustig 31 Anna Mitchell Mahoney 32 Laura Helen Marks 33 Bernice L. McFadden 34 Roberto Nicosia 35 Ari Ofengenden 36-38 Amy Pfrimmer 39 Stephanie Porras 40 Gary A. Remer 41 Oana Sabo 42 Eduardo Silva 43 Aidan Smith 44-45 Henry W. Sullivan 46 Edwige Tamalet Talbayev 47 Raymond Taras 48 Mark I. Vail A Message from Dean Edwards Our annual showcase provides an opportunity to recognize the scholarly and creative achievements of faculty in the School of Liberal Arts. This year, we celebrate 32 books, 6 solo exhibitions, 2 theatrical performances, and 3 musical recordings—a remarkable collective accomplishment. With these works, professors in SLA advance scholarly conversations in a range of fields and disciplines, and our arts faculty bring both beauty and provocative creative thinking to publics near and far. SLA’s faculty helps us to understand the world we live in—past, present, and sometimes future—and expand our own sensibilities. They inspire their students and bring the lessons of their labors into the classroom, educating and inspiring by their discoveries and their example.
    [Show full text]
  • Hesiod and the Thespian Festival of the Muses
    Robert Lamberton- September 21st, 1991 Hesiod and the Thespian Festival of the Muses The Hesiodic tradition (from pre-5th century until just recently) has maintained that Hesiod - a mere rustic bard - had met and been tutored by the Muses near Ascra and Mount Helicon in Boeotia; inspired by them, he wrote the Theogony and Works and Days. Whether the Muses were taken literally or metaphorically, Hesiod himself, in contrast to the nameless and faceless author of the Iliad and Odyssey, was still taken as literal and the autobiographical elements in the poems as true: his feud with his brother, the homeland and resettlement of his father, etc. Local inhabitants of the town of Pyrgake pointed out to travelers the home of Hesiod, with Helicon in the background. But in the last two generations, especially as the nature of oral poetry has become clearer, a historical Hesiod has become less accepted. We will look mainly at the account given by Plutarch, himself also a Boeotian, who was born during the reign of Claudius and died during the reign of Hadrian and who wrote a commentary on Hesiod's Works and Days. There is almost no evidence of the existence of Theogony or Works and Days prior to the Hellenistic age. Musaeus and Orpheus are clearly legendary characters, but Hesiod gives so much detail about himself in the works that it has been hard to see him as merely a literary construct. Plutarch, who may have written a life of Hesiod, believed Hesiod was a historical figure, but evidence he gives casts doubt on the integrity of some of the details of Hesiod's autobiography.
    [Show full text]
  • Musset-Text.Pdf
    f'. tl ;; ~" INTRODUCTION I ~, , ~I;'" '" ! Although Alfred de Musset (I8IO-57) is traditionally anthologized, with Lamartine, Vigny, and Hugo, as one of the major French Ro­ ~.: mantic poets, he really should be considered, with Gautier, Nerval, i~i.. .. £1....: and others, among the movement's second generation. Like many a t ~: youth, he had ambivalent feelings about the ideas and sentiments of ~,j. his elders. On the one hand, his autobiographical novel, The Confes­ f: {' sions of a Child of the Century, is a major model of Romantic con­ t fessional prose; on the other hand, he became identified among his ~~; , i" ~. peers as a major proponent of the revival of neoclassical tragedy in ~, the theater, as well as a sarcastic, even virulent, lampooner of Ro­ I.': ~j mantic stylistic excesses, in his widely read and amusing Letters of ~L ' Dupuis and Cotonet, in which he gave a well-known definition of F)'" Romanticism as "the overuse of adjectives." Musset's primary renown in modern times has been as a drama­ " :1 ,~ tist. When Vietor Hugo's Hernani and Alexandre Dumas pere's An­ 1"::'11 I)'p; tony were produced around f830, they made a considerable stir in "d' ~-.!j.! the theater. But the "Romantic" Musset has remained perhaps the l" only "classic" dramatist of his time. Actually, the best of his plays 11 were not staged during his life: of his most original works, What \" {I Does Marianne Want? alone was performed, in a radically altered ~J and disfigured version, in 185I. Lorenzaccio had to wait until 1896, forty years after the author's death, and was then done in a "regular­ ~, ized" form commissioned by Sarah Bernhardt so she might add the ~., play's hero to her list of transvestite roles - a travesty in both the :f: usual and the etymological senses of the term," ~f ~~ 'See my study Theater ofSolitude: The Drama of Alfred de Musset, Hanover, N.H., ;1 r974, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • 1- Frederick A. De Armas Department of Romance Languages And
    Frederick A. de Armas Department of Romance Languages and Literatures, The University of Chicago 1115 E. 58th St. Chicago IL 60637 Phone: (773) 702-8481. Fax: (773) 834-1095 Home Phone: (773) 955-5103; E-mail: [email protected] I. ACADEMIC POSITIONS Andrew W. Mellon Distinguished Service Professor in Humanities and Professor of Spanish and Comparative Literature, University of Chicago (2010- ) Andrew W. Mellon Professor in Humanities and Professor of Spanish and Comparative Literature (2004-2010) University of Chicago Andrew W. Mellon Professor in Humanities and Professor of Spanish (2001-04) University of Chicago Professor in Romance Languages (2000-2001) University of Chicago Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Spanish and Comparative Literature (1998-2000) Pennsylvania State University, University Park Distinguished Professor of Spanish and Comparative Literature (1991-98) Pennsylvania State University, University Park Professor of Spanish and Comparative Literature (1988-91): Pennsylvania State University, University Park Fellow of the Institute for the Arts and Humanistic Studies (1989-2000): Pennsylvania State University, University Park Professor (1978-88): Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge Associate Professor (1973-78): Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge Assistant Professor (1968-73): Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge Visiting Appointments Visiting Associate Professor (Summer 1977): University of Missouri, Columbia Visiting Professor (1986): University of Missouri, Columbia Visiting Professor of Spanish (1994): Duke University Teaching Undergraduate courses: Elementary and Intermediate Spanish; Conversation; Readings in -1- Spanish Literature; Survey of Spanish Literature; Advanced Stylistics; Advanced Grammar and Composition; Classical Texts; Myths of Invisibility in Literature; Don Quixote, Spanish Prose of the Golden Age; Theater of the Golden Age; Spanish Poetry of the Golden Age; Ekphrasis: From Homer to Cervantes, etc.
    [Show full text]