DOCSLIB.ORG

Using Data Visualization to Help Tell Project Stories Mickey O’Hara, Colorado Water Trust October 11, 2017, Sustaining Colorado Watersheds Conference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Using Data Visualization to Help Tell Project Stories Mickey O’Hara, Colorado Water Trust October 11, 2017, Sustaining Colorado Watersheds Conference Using Data Visualization To Help Tell Project Stories Mickey O’Hara, Colorado Water Trust October 11, 2017, Sustaining Colorado Watersheds Conference Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Using Data to Tell Project Stories • Water Trust’s interest in sharing project data • Process to develop dashboard and project stories • Tips to develop data visualizations • Tools to use for data visualization projects Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Colorado Water Trust • Restore streamflows to Colorado’s rivers in need • 28 restoration projects since 2001 • 8.4 billion gallons (or nearly 26,000 acre-feet) of water restored to nearly 400 miles of rivers and streams. • Market-based, voluntary projects Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Colorado Water Trust’s 2016 Strategic Plan Advance the State of the Practice Leverage our knowledge and tools Continue to restore streamflow Develop and implement comprehensive communications strategy Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Develop and communicate metrics of success to donors, funders, project partners, and policy makers Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Metrics Flow Flow Flow Benefits Project: Project Name Project Type Date Completed Benefits Benefits Water Division Water District Stream (af) (cfs) (mi) 1005-0006-ACQ Moser Blue River Acq - Permanent 12/8/2005 3.84 513 14.1 Division 5: Colorado 36 - Blue River Basin Boulder Creek, Blue River 1005-0008-ACQ Vail/Hat Creek Acq - Permanent 12/26/2007 2 171 5.18 Division 5: Colorado 37 - Eagle River Basin Hat Creek, Brush Creek 1005-0011-CON Pitkin County Trust Agreement Acq - Limited Term 12/9/2009 Division 5: Colorado 38 - Roaring Fork River Basin Roaring Fork Basin streams * 1005-0012-ACQ Stapleton Brothers Ditch/Maroon Creek Acq - Limited Term 6/30/2010 3.83 862.24 18.04 Division 5: Colorado 38 - Roaring Fork River Basin Maroon Creek, Roaring Fork River 1004-0003-ACQ Breem Ditch/Washington Gulch Acq - Permanent 12/27/2010 1.3 251.3 4.39 Division 4: Gunnision 62 - Upper Gunnison River Washington Gulch, Slate River 1004-0023-PHY CCC Ditch Physical solutions 11/1/2011 Division 4: Gunnision 60 - San Miguel River Basin San Miguel 1007-0003-ACQ Three Sisters Ditch/Hermosa Creek Retirement 7/9/2012 1.5 44 20 Division 7: San Juan/Dolores 30 - Animas River Basin Hermosa Creek 1006-0006 STL UYWCD 2012 Acq - 3-in-10 Lease 7/11/2012 26.7 4000 92.1 Division 6: Yampa/White 58 - Upper Yampa River Yampa River * 1006-0004-STL CPW Big Beaver Reservoir Acq - 3-in-10 Lease 7/17/2012 20 3000 42 Division 6: Yampa/White 43 - White River Basin Beaver Creek, White River 1005-0020-STL Aspen Shorefox Acq - 3-in-10 Lease 7/26/2012 11.66 682.2 37.9 Division 5: Colorado 51 - Upper Colorado/Fraser Rivers Willow Creek, Colorado River 1005-0027 STL Coyote River Ranch Acq - 3-in-10 Lease 8/2/2012 1.62 429.2 0.5 Division 5: Colorado 53 - Tribs. North Colorado River Deep Creek 1005-0043-STL Winter Park Ranch Water & San Distr Acq - 3-in-10 Lease 6/6/2013 0.53 167.23 18 Division 5: Colorado 51 - Upper Colorado/Fraser Rivers St. Louis Creek, Fraser River 1005-0045-NDA Wheeler Ditch - 2013 Non-diversion Agreement 7/24/2013 2.9 454.5 2.5 Division 5: Colorado 38 - Roaring Fork River Basin Roaring Fork River 1004-0004-STL McKinley Ditch Acq - 3-in-10 Lease 8/19/2013 2.1 165.6 8.63 Division 4: Gunnision 62 - Upper Gunnison River Little Cimarron 1006-0006 STL UYWCD 2013 Acq - 3-in-10 Lease 8/20/2013 30 2819 5.4 Division 6: Yampa/White 58 - Upper Yampa River Yampa River 1001-0009-PHY Josh Ames Physical solutions 11/4/2013 Division 1: South Platte 3 - Cache La Poudre River Cache la Poudre * 1003-0002-ACQ ARK Valdez Ditch Acq - Permanent 12/27/2013 0.5 340 16.46 Division 3: Rio Grande 21 - Alamosa La Jara Alamosa River * 1003-0002-ACQ ARK Gabino Gallegos Ditch Acq - Permanent 12/27/2013 2.5 1660 16.86 Division 3: Rio Grande 22 - Alamosa La Jara Alamosa River 1005-0045-NDA Wheeler Ditch - 2014 Non-diversion Agreement 5/6/2014 1 113 2.5 Division 5: Colorado 38 - Roaring Fork River Basin Roaring Fork River 1004-0004-ACQ McKinley Ditch Acq - Permanent 12/31/2014 5.81 771.5 8.63 Division 4: Gunnision 62 - Upper Gunnison River Little Cimarron River 1004-0027-STL Coats Bros Ditch Acq - 3-in-10 Lease 5/19/2015 1.85 203.2 12.3 Division 4: Gunnision 28 - Tomichi Creek Tomichi Creek 1005-0055 Rio Colorado SB 19 Conservation Plan 6/11/2015 10.33 968 4.8 Division 5: Colorado 51 - Upper Colorado/Fraser Rivers Willow Creek, Colorado River 1006-0006-UYWCD 2015 Reservoir Release 8/10/2015 28 1043 18 Division 6: Yampa/White 58 - Upper Yampa River Yampa River 1005-0045-NDA Wheeler Ditch - Ten Year SB 19 Conservation Plan 5/9/2016 2.5 588 2.5 Division 5: Colorado 38 - Roaring Fork River Basin Roaring Fork River 1004-0004-SCPP McKinley Ditch SCPP System Conservation 6/20/2016 1.8 169.7 8.63 Division 4: Gunnision 62 - Upper Gunnison River Little Cimarron River 1006-0006-UYWCD 2016 Reservoir Release 9/22/2016 10 264 18 Division 6: Yampa/White 58 - Upper Yampa River Yampa River 1005-0066-Upper Fraser Tributaries SB 19 Conservation Plan 11/15/2016 3.14 513 13.4 Division 5: Colorado 51 - Upper Colorado/Fraser Rivers Skunk Creek 1006-0006 UYWCD 2017 Acq - 3-in-10 Lease 6/30/2017 21 1200 18 Division 6: Yampa/White 58 - Upper Yampa River Yampa River Total 28 196 21393 409 Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Metrics 250 450 400 200 Cumulative Flow Benefits (cfs) 350 Cumulative Miles of River Benefited (mi) 300 150 250 200 100 150 Cumulative Flow Benefits (cfs) Benefits Flow Cumulative 100 50 Cumulative Miles of River Benefited (mi) Benefited River Miles of Cumulative 50 0 0 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15 Jan-16 Jan-17 Jan-18 Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Why focus on data visualization? • Communicate information effectively using visual objects • Display data at a high level, with the opportunity to dive into finer detail • Graphics can help reveal what’s behind the data Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Data Information • Start With a Question – “How do we show people where our projects are operating, and how much water they’re restoring at any given time?” • Start With Your Audience – “To whom do we need to convey our project data and information?” • Answer the question, address the intended audience – Create value for the audience Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Information Story • Select a tool to use that will allow you to display your data in the most efficient manner possible. • Are you trying to educate? Entertain? Call to action? • Many options to create stories, with varying costs and levels of technical knowledge required – Excel – Google sheets – Esri ArcGIS – Mapbox – Tableau Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Data Source = Google Sheets Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Data Source into Tableau • Pull data from cloud, excel, AWS, many other locations • Use joins and unions to organize data Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Story = Interactive Dashboard Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Tooltips Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Highlighting Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Filtering Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Filtering Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Project Stories • Esri’s Story Map Cascade web-app • Allows for inclusion of interactive maps, Tableau Dashboards, full-screen photos, videos, scrolling text Wheeler Ditch Project Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Esri Story Maps Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Individual Project Accounting Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Interactive Storytelling Tools • Keep it SIMPLE • Keep it easy to understand, for your entire audience • Allow users to dig as deep as they’d like, or just skim the surface and gain a better understanding The Washington Times Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Visualization Options • 2D area maps • Drought visualization for 2011-2016: https://adventuresinmapping.com/2016/07/12/five-years-of-drought/ Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Visualization Options • Temporal representations • Time series charts • Line Graph • Bar Chart • Stacked Area Chart • Gantt Chart • Stream Graph • Heat Map http://flare.prefuse.org/apps/job_voyager Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Visualization Options • Multidimensional Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 How else can we visualize data? Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Additional Resources • Water Trust Stories – www.coloradowatertrust.org/impact • Data Visualization: – Visualization Library: • http://guides.library.duke.edu/datavis/vis_types – Open Water Foundation • http://openwaterfoundation.org/ – Tableau • Tableau Foundation for Nonprofits (https://www.tableau.com/foundation/about) – ESRI • Story Maps (https://storymaps.arcgis.com/en/) • Arcgis Online Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017 Thank You Mickey O’Hara, Water Resources Engineer [email protected] Data Visualization | SCW Conference 2017.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam Final Environmental Impact Statement
    Record of Decision Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam Final Environmental Impact Statement I. Summary of Action and Background The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) has completed a final environmental impact statement (EIS) on the operation of Flaming Gorge Dam. The EIS describes the potential effects of modifying the operation of Flaming Gorge Dam to assist in the recovery of four endangered fish, and their critical habitat, downstream from the dam. The four endangered fish species are Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius), humpback chub (Gila cypha), razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus), and bonytail (Gila elegans). Reclamation would implement the proposed action by modifying the operations of Flaming Gorge Dam, to the extent possible, to achieve the flows and temperatures recommended by participants of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (Recovery Program). Reclamation’s goal is to implement the proposed action and, at the same time, maintain and continue all authorized purposes of the Colorado River Storage Project. The purpose of the proposed action is to operate Flaming Gorge Dam to protect and assist in recovery of the populations and designated critical habitat of the four endangered fishes, while maintaining all authorized purposes of the Flaming Gorge Unit of the Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP), including those related to the development of water resources in accordance with the Colorado River Compact. As the Federal agency responsible for the operation of Flaming Gorge Dam, Reclamation was the lead agency in preparing the EIS. Eight cooperating agencies also participated in preparing this EIS: the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, State of Utah Department of Natural Resources, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 12B-01. Mountainous Volcanic Region
    108°W 106°W F Ancestral ron t Rang LARIMER Uinta Sand Upl e ift Little Snake River Wash Ba North Platte River MOFFAT s Yampa River in JACKSON Park-Gore Range Axial ROUTT Ba s in Up li h ft rc as A ek e Dougl Cr White River GRAND 40°N Whi EXPLANATION RIO BLANCO 40°N te Ri Neogene Volcanics ver Upli Neogene Sediments ft Paleogene Volcanics Eagle River Blue River Paleocene-Cretaceous Intrusives Piceance Basin Roaring ForkCentral River Colorado TroughEAGLE Cretaceous Seaway Sediment GARFIELD Eagle River Sawatch Range Aquifers SUMMIT Mesozoic Sediment Aquifers Ancestral Rockies Basins Colorado River Precambrian Basement PITKIN Arkansas River East Muddy Creek Mountainous Region MESA LAKE PARK Unc Mountainous Valleys ompa ghre Up Colorado Plateaus Region lif DELTA t Laramide Basin Outlines Laramide Uplift Axis Uncompaghre Uplift G un Taylor River CHAFFEE nison Laramide Basin Axis GUNNISON Upl Ancestral Rockies Uplift Axis Uncompahgre River South Arkansas River ift Ancestral Rockies Basin Axis Paradox Basin FREMONT MONTROSE San Lui CUSTER s OURAY Up San Miguel River li ft 38°N SAN MIGUEL SAGUACHE 38°N Animas River HINSDALE DOLORES SAN JUAN Rio Grande MINERAL ag Dolores River n S West Dolores River ua J RIO GRANDE ALAMOSA e San MONTEZUMA n Dom Jua Archuleta Anticlinorium San Los Pinos River LA PLATA COSTILLA San Juan Piedra River Basin CONEJOS Tusas Uplift COSTILLA ARCHULETA COSTILLA 108°W 106°W 0 10 20 30 40 50 Miles Geology modified from Tweto (1979); structural features from Hemborg (1996). 0 10 20 30 40 50 Kilometers Figure 12b-01.
    [Show full text]
  • Big-River Monitoring on the Colorado Plateau
    I NVENTORY & M ONITORING N ETWORK Big-River Monitoring on the Colorado Plateau Dustin Perkins1, Mike Scott2, Greg Auble2, Mark Wondzell3, Chris Holmquist-Johnson2, Eric Wahlig2, Helen Thomas1, and Aneth Wight1; 1Northern Colorado Plateau Network, P.O. Box 848, Bldg. 11, Arches National Park, Moab, UT 84532 2U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Discipline, FORT Science Center, 2150 Centre Ave., Building C, Fort Collins, CO 80526; 3National Park Service, Water Resources Division, 1201 Oakridge Dr., Ste. 150, Fort Collins, CO 80525 Introduction and Green rivers in Canyonlands National Park. The Yampa River is the longest relatively free-flowing river Water has always been in short supply in the western reach remaining in the Colorado River basin. The U.S., making it a consistent source of conflict. In Green River is highly regulated by Flaming Gorge Dam the Colorado River drainage, an increasing human but is partially restored below its confluence with the population fuels increased demands for water from Yampa River. There have been large-scale changes the river and its tributaries. As a result, streamflow to the Green River since Flaming Gorge Dam was in virtually all of these systems has been altered by completed in 1962. reservoirs and other water-development projects. In most cases, reduced flows have significantly altered Monitoring of these rivers and their riparian peak flows and increased base flows that structure vegetation focuses on processes that affect the river floodplain vegetation, stream-channel morphology, channel, active bars, and riparian floodplains. To get and water quality (e.g., temperature, suspended a complete picture of river conditions, the NCPN sediment, nutrients).
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Drainage Changes in Uncompahgre Plateau-Grand
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/32 Pleistocene drainage changes in Uncompahgre Plateau-Grand Valley region of western Colorado, including formation and abandonment of Unaweep Canyon: a hypothesis Scott Sinnock, 1981, pp. 127-136 in: Western Slope (Western Colorado), Epis, R. C.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 32nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 337 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1981 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Itinerary: the Yampa River: 5 Days/4 Nights
    Itinerary: PO Box 1324 Moab, UT 84532 (800) 332-2439 The Yampa River: (435) 259-8229 Fax (435) 259-2226 Email: [email protected] 5 Days/4 Nights www.GriffithExp.com T h r o u g h Dinosaur National Monument O v e r v i e w of The Yampa River Meeting Place Best Western Antlers 423 West Main Street Vernal, UT 84078 Meeting Time : 6 : 3 0 pm (MDT) The evening before your trip Orientation: 6 : 3 0 pm (MDT) the day BEFORE d e p a r t u r e H e r e you will learn what to expect and prepare for, receive your dry bags, sign Assumption of Risk forms, and get a chance to ask last minute q u e s t i o n s . Morning Place : Best Western Antlers 423 West Main Street Vernal, UT 84078 M o r n i n g T i m e : 7 : 0 0 a m (MDT) Return Time : Approximately 5 : 0 0 - 6 : 0 0 P M Rapid Rating: C l a s s I I I - I V (water level dependent) # of Rapids : 16 River Miles: 72 P u t i n : Deer Lodge Park Ranger Station T a k e - out : Split Mountain boat ramp Trip Length: 5 D a y s / 4 N i g h t s Raft Type(s): O a r b o a t s , Paddleboats and Inflatable Kayaks Age Limit: Minimum Age is 10 y e a r s o l d What makes this trip special? The Yampa River through the Dinosaur National Monument has it all! As the last free-flowing river in the entire Colorado River drainage, the Yampa is incredibly wild in May and June.
    [Show full text]
  • Flaming Gorge Operation Plan - May 2021 Through April 2022
    Flaming Gorge Operation Plan - May 2021 through April 2022 Concurrence by Kathleen Callister, Resources Management Division Manager Kent Kofford, Provo Area Office Manager Nicholas Williams, Upper Colorado Basin Power Manager Approved by Wayne Pullan, Upper Colorado Basin Regional Director U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation • Interior Region 7 Upper Colorado Basin • Power Office Salt Lake City, Utah May 2021 Purpose This Flaming Gorge Operation Plan (FG-Ops) fulfills the 2006 Flaming Gorge Record of Decision (ROD) requirement for May 2021 through April 2022. The FG-Ops also completes the 4-step process outlined in the Flaming Gorge Standard Operation Procedures. The Upper Colorado Basin Power Office (UCPO) operators will fulfil the operation plan and may alter from FG-Ops due to day to day conditions, although we will attempt to stay within the boundaries of the operations defined below. Listed below are proposed operation plans for four different scenarios: moderately dry, average (above median), average (below median), and moderately wet. As of the publishing of this document, the most likely scenario is the moderately dry, however actual operations will vary with hydrologic conditions. The Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (Recovery Program), the Flaming Gorge Technical Working Group (FGTWG), Flaming Gorge Working Group (FG WG), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) provided input that was considered in the development of this report. The FG-Ops describes the current hydrologic classification of the Green River Basin and the hydrologic conditions in the Yampa River Basin. The FG-Ops identifies the most likely Reach 2 peak flow magnitude and duration that is to be targeted for the upcoming spring flows.
    [Show full text]
  • FIXING the UPPER COLORADO RIVER Paul Bruchez, Reeder
    FIXING THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER Paul Bruchez, Reeder Creek Ranch Mely Whiting, Colorado Counsel, Trout Unlimited Lurline Curran, former Grand County manager Grand County’s most famous tourist was President Dwight Eisenhower, who in the 1950s spent summer vacations snagging trout from the Fraser River. That river even then was significantly depleted by diversion to Denver. Nearby, at Grand Lake, the Colorado-Big Thompson (C-BT) had begun a massive withdrawal of water from the Colorado River. Later, in the 1980s, came another major disruption to the local water-dependent ecosystems, a dam on the Colorado River near Windy Gap, where it is joined by the Fraser. It all adds up to what rancher and fishing guide Paul Bruchez described as death by a thousand cuts. The full extent of the problems became apparent in the 2002 drought and its aftermath. In old days, before all the diversions began, ranchers in the Kremmling area had just relied upon springtime snowmelt flooding by the river to deliver water to their hay fields. Because of the C-BT diversions, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation had installed pumps along the river, to ensure ranchers could get water into the fields. As river flows receded in the 21st century, those pumps had become inadequate even as Denver Water and Northern Water (beneficiary of the C-BT) pushed long-standing plans for further diversions. The net result: 80 percent of native flows in the Colorado River would be diverted across the Continental Divide. This could have gotten ugly, but Grand County instead chose a different approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Yampa River Is Placed on Call for 1St Time Ever | Steamboattoday.Com 8/12/20, 943 AM
    Yampa River is placed on call for 1st time ever | SteamboatToday.com 8/12/20, 943 AM YOUR AD HERE » Yampa River is placed on call for 1st time ever News FOLLOW NEWS | September 5, 2018 Eleanor C. Hasenbeck FOLLOW [email protected] The Yampa River flows through Dinosaur National Monument around Aug. 18. Low flows in the lower stretch of the river led water managers to curtail some use of water from the river. (courtesy photo) STEAMBOAT SPRINGS — For the first time, water users on the main stem of the Yampa River have been curtailed. Due to low water conditions in the lower stretch of the river near Dinosaur National Monument, the Colorado Division of Water Resources placed a call on the river Tuesday. The call applies to water users upstream from the river’s lowest diversion point, which essentially places the entire river on call. https://www.steamboatpilot.com/news/yampa-river-is-placed-on-call-for-1st-time-ever/ Page 1 of 4 Yampa River is placed on call for 1st time ever | SteamboatToday.com 8/12/20, 943 AM “We are now faced again with the Yampa River being extremely low at its lower end, and we are unable to both protect the Endangered Fishes Recovery Program reservoir water and allow all water users to continue to divert water,” Erin Light, the area division engineer, wrote in an email to water users in the Yampa River Basin on Wednesday morning. The Division of Water Resources places a call on a stream when water rights owners do not receive the amount of water they have a legal right to.
    [Show full text]
  • Flaming Gorge Operation Plan - May 2020 Through April 2021
    Flaming Gorge Operation Plan - May 2020 through April 2021 Concurrence by Date Kathleen Callister, Resource Management Division Chief Date ___________, Provo Area Office Manager Date ___________, Upper Colorado Power Manager Approved by Date Brent Esplin, Upper Colorado Regional Director Purpose Blue for changes that will happen This Flaming Gorge Operation Plan (FG-Ops) fulfills the 2006 Flaming Gorge Record of Decision (ROD) requirement for May 2020 through April 2021. The FG-Ops also completes the 4-step process outlined in the Flaming Gorge Standard Operation Procedures. The Upper Colorado Basin Power Office (UCPO) operators will fulfil the operation plan and may alter from FG-Ops due to day to day conditions, although we will attempt to stay within the boundaries of the operations defined below. Listed below are proposed operation plans for 3 different scenarios: moderately dry, average (above / below median), and moderately wet. As of the publishing of this document, the most likely scenario is the average (below median), however actual operations will vary with hydrologic conditions. This operation plan covers Flaming Gorge operation from May 2020 through April 2021 per the Flaming Gorge Final Environmental Impact (EIS). Both the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (Recovery Program) and the Flaming Gorge Technical Working Group (FGTWG) along with input from the Flaming Gorge Working Group, United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) provided input that is incorporated into the Final FG-Ops. The 2005 Final EIS specifically addresses and outlines the content of the FGTWG proposal. This outline is used for the basis of the FG-Ops.
    [Show full text]
  • Source Water Protection Plan Grand County, Colorado
    TOWN OF FRASER RESOLUTION 2018-05-03 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FRASER RIVER PARTNERSHIP SOURCE WATER PROTECTION PLAN WHEREAS, A Source Water Protection Plan identifies a Source Water Protection Area (SWPA), lists potential contaminant sources, and outlines best management practices (BMPs) to reduce risks to the water source. WHEREAS, The Fraser River Source Water Protection Partnership (FRSWPP) was established to provide a framework for public water systems in the Fraser River Valley to collaborate on the protection of their drinking water sources from all potential sources of contamination. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO THAT: The Town Board hereby adopts the attached Fraser River Partnership Source Water Protection Plan. DULY MOVED, SECONDED AND ADOPTED THIS 2ND DAY OF MAY 2018. Votes in favor: ___ BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Votes opposed: ___ TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO Abstained: ___ Absent: ___ BY: Mayor ATTEST: (S E A L) Town Clerk Fraser River Source Water Protection Partnership Source Water Protection Plan Grand County, Colorado June 28, 2017 Written by: Ryan Lokteff Fraser River Source Water Protection Partnership Fraser River Source Water Protection Partnership Source Water Protection Plan Contents WATER SYSTEM CONTACT LIST ..................................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Classifications and Numeric Standards for Upper Colorado River Basin and North Platte River
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. November 12, 2020 Regulation No. 33 - Classifications and Numeric Standards for Upper Colorado River Basin and North Platte River Effective March 12, 2020 The following provisions are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes with these few exceptions: EPA has taken no action on: • All segment-specific total phosphorus (TP) numeric standards based on the interim value for river/stream segments with a cold water aquatic life classification (0.11 mg/L TP) or a warm water aquatic life classification (0.17 mg/L TP) • All segment-specific TP numeric standards based on the interim value for lake/reservoir segments with a warm water aquatic life classification (0.083 mg/L TP) Code of Colorado Regulations Secretary of State State of Colorado DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT Water Quality Control Commission REGULATION NO. 33 - CLASSIFICATIONS AND NUMERIC STANDARDS FOR UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN AND NORTH PLATTE RIVER (PLANNING REGION 12) 5 CCR 1002-33 [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] 33.1 AUTHORITY These regulations are promulgated pursuant to section 25-8-101 et seq. C.R.S., as amended, and in particular, 25-8-203 and 25-8-204.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Mountain Reservoir Substitution and Power Interference Agreements Final EA
    Green Mountain Reservoir Substitution and Power Interference Agreements Final EA Table of Contents Acronyms...................................................................................................................................... vi 1.0 Purpose and Need .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Purpose and Need .................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Study Area........................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Background.......................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4.1 Prior Appropriation System .....................................................................1-2 1.4.2 Reclamation and Green Mountain Reservoir...........................................1-2 1.4.3 Western Area Power Administration.......................................................1-4 1.4.4 Springs Utilities’ Collection Systems and Customers .............................1-4 1.4.5 Blue River Decree....................................................................................1-7 1.4.6 Substitution Year Operations...................................................................1-8 1.4.7 Substitution Memorandums of Agreement............................................1-10
    [Show full text]