DOCSLIB.ORG

Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility: Selected Sources of Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility: Selected Sources of Information CORPORATE SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY: SELECTED SOURCES OF INFORMATION Bibliography and Websites Prepared by Renato Alva Pino Prepared for the UNRISD project on Business Responsibility for Sustainable Development Under the Programme area Technology, Business and Society Published in Voluntary Approaches to Corporate Responsibility: Readings and a Resource Guide by the UN Non-Governmental Liaison Service (NGLS) and UNRISD Geneva, Switzerland, May 2002 General Addo, M.K. (ed.). 1999. Human Rights Standards and the Responsibility of Transnational Corporations. The Hague: Kluwer Law International. Amnesty International. 2000. Human Rights: Is It Any of Your Business? Amnesty International-UK and The Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum: London. Anderson, R. 1998. Mid-Course Correction: Toward a Sustainable Enterprise, The Interface Mode. Atlanta: Peregrinzilla Press. Arnold, M. and Day, R. 1998. The Next Bottom Line: Making Sustainable Development Tangible. World Resources Institute: Washington, DC. Atkinson, J. 1998. Undermined: The Impact of Australian Mining Companies in Developing Countries. Community Aid Abroad: Victoria. Aubert, M., Brama, P. and Blum, R. 1999. Le rôle de compagnies pétrolières dans la politique internationale et son impact social et environnemental. Rapport d’information de l’Assemblée Nationale Française. Assemblée Nationale Française: Paris. Avery, C. 2000. Business and Human Rights in a Time of Change. Amnesty International-UK: London. Barkin, D. 1999. The Greening of Business in Mexico, Discussion Paper No. 110. UNRISD: Geneva. Cairncross, F. 1995. Green Inc.: A Guide to Business and the Environment. Earthscan: London. Capra, F. and Pauli, G. (eds.). 1995. Steering Business Toward Sustainability. United Nations University Press: Tokyo. Clark, A. and Clark, J. 1998. An Integrated Methodology for Assessing the Social and Cultural Impact of Mining. UNCTAD: Geneva. Commission of the European Communities. 2001. Green Paper: Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. Commission of European Communities: Brussels. Conference Board of Canada. 1999. Taking Action on Corporate Social Responsibility. Conference Board of Canada: Ottawa. Council on Economic Priorities. 2000. Shopping for a Better World: The Quick and Easy Guide to All Your Socially Responsible Shopping. CEP: San Francisco. Elkington, J. 2001. Chrysalis: How Citizen CEOs and Their Corporations Are Fusing Values and Value Creation in the New Economy. Capstone Pub: Oxford. Elkington, J. 1997. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone: Oxford. European Business Network for Social Cohesion. 1996. Corporate Initiatives: Putting into Practice the European Declaration of Business against Exclusion. EBNSC: Brussels. Foran, T. 2001. Corporate Social Responsibility at Nine Multinational Electronics Firms in Thailand: A Preliminary Analysis. Report to the California Global Corporate Accountability Project. Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainable Development: Berkeley. Garcia-Johnson, R. 2000. Exporting Environmentalism: U.S. Multinational Chemical Corporations in Brazil and Mexico. MIT Press: Cambridge. 2 Gaudier, M. 1999. Firms of the Future: Economic Efficiency and Social Performance, Bibliographical Series No. 19. International Institute of Labour Studies: Geneva. Goodell, E. 1999. Standards of Corporate Social Responsibility. Social Venture Network: San Francisco. Groenewegen, P., Fischer, K., Jenkins, E. and Schot, J. (eds.). 1996. The Greening of Industry Resource Guide and Bibliography. Island Press: Washington, DC. Hampden-Turner, C. and Trompenaars, A. 1994. The Seven Cultures of Capitalism: Value Systems for Creating Wealth in the United States, Britain, Japan, Germany, France, Sweden and the Netherlands. Judith Piatkus Publisher: London. Hansen, M. 1999. Cross-Border Environmental Management in Transnational Corporations: An Analytical Approach, Occasional Paper No. 5. UNCTAD: Geneva. Hansen, M. 1999. Environmental Management in Transnational Corporations in Asia: Does Foreign Ownership Make a Difference?, Occasional Paper No. 11. UNCTAD: Geneva. Hawken, P. 1993. The Ecology of Commerce. Harper Collins: New York. Hawken, P., Lovins, A. and Lovins, H. 1999. Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. Earthscan: London. Henderson, D. 2001. Misguided Virtue: False Notions of Corporate Social Responsibility. New Zealand Business Roundtable: Wellington. Hillary, R. (ed.). 2000. Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Environment: Business Imperatives. Greenleaf Publishing: Sheffield. Himmelstein, J. 1997. Looking Good and Doing Good: Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Power (Philanthropic Studies). Indiana University Press: Bloomington. Holliday, C. and Pepper, J. 2001. Sustainability through the Market: Seven Keys to Success. World Business Council for Sustainable Development: Geneva. Holme, R. and Watts, P. 2000. Corporate Social Responsibility: Making Good Business Sense. World Business Council for Sustainable Development: Geneva. Hopkins, M. 1998. The Planetary Bargain: Corporate Social Responsibility Comes of Age. Macmillan: London. International Council on Human Rights Policy. 2002. Beyond Voluntarism: Human Rights and the Developing International Legal Obligations of Companies. ICHRP: Versoix. International Institute for Environment and Development, and Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development Project. 2002. Breaking New Ground: Mining, Minerals, and Sustainable Development. Earthscan: London. Jenkins, R. 2000. Industry and Environment in Latin America. Routledge: London. Kemp, M. 2001. Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia: Quixotic Dream or Confident Expectation? Technology, Business and Society, Programme Paper No. 6. UNRISD: Geneva. Klein, N. 2000. No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies. Picador: New York. 3 Kolodner, E. 1994. Transnational Corporations: Impediments or Catalysts of Social Development?, Occasional Paper No. 5. UNRISD: Geneva. Ledgerwood, G. 1997. Greening the Boardroom: Corporate Environmental Governance and Business Sustainability. Greenleaf Publishing: Sheffield. Logan, D., Roy, D. and Regelbrugge, L. 1997. Global Corporate Citizenship: Rationale and Strategies. Hitachi Foundation: Washington, DC. Makower, R. 1995. Beyond the Bottom Line: Putting Social Responsibility to Work for Your Business and the World. Touchstone Books: New York. McInerney, F. and White, S. 1995. The Total Quality Corporation. How 10 Major Companies Turned Quality and Environmental Challenges to Competitive Advantage in the 1990s. Dutton Press: New York. McIntosh, M. (ed.). 1998, 1999, 2000. Visions of Ethical Business. Three volumes. Financial Times Prentice Hall Publishing: London. McIntosh, M. and Andriof, J. (eds.). 2001. Perspectives on Corporate Citizenship. Greenleaf Publishing: Sheffield. McIntosh, M., Leipziger, D., Jones, K. and Coleman, G. 1998. Corporate Citizenship: Successful Strategies for Responsible Companies. Financial Times Prentice Hall Publishing: London. McPhail, K. and Davy, A. 1998. Integrating Social Concerns into Private Sector Decisionmaking, Discussion Paper No. 384. The World Bank: Washington, DC. Moser, T. 2001. “Transnational corporations and sustainable development: The case of the Colombian and Peruvian petroleum industries,” in World Development, 29:2. Nattrass, B. and Altomare, M. 1998. The Natural Step for Business: Wealth, Ecology and the Evolutionary Corporation. New Society Publishers: Gabriola Island. North-South Institute. 1998. Canadian Development Report 1998: Canadian Corporations and Social Responsibility. North-South Institute: Ottawa. Nyberg, M. 1998. Green Capital: A Report on Large Corporations and the Environment. Friends of the Earth Sweden: Gothenburg. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2001. Corporate Responsibility: Private Initiatives and Public Goals. OECD: Paris. Palazzi, M. and Starcher, G. 1997. Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Success. The European Baha’i Business Forum: Paris. Perry, M. and Singh, S. 2001. Corporate Environmental Responsibility in Singapore and Malaysia: The Potential and Limits of Voluntary Initiatives. Technology, Business and Society, Programme Paper No. 3. UNRISD: Geneva. Piasecki, B. 1995. Corporate Environmental Strategy: The Avalanche of Change since Bhopal. John Wiley & Sons: New York. Reader, A. 1994. In Pursuit of Principle and Profit: Business Success through Social Responsibility. G.P. Putnam and Sons: New York. Robbins, P. 2001. Greening the Corporations: Management Strategy and the Environmental Challenge. London: Earthscan. 4 Roome, N. (ed.). 1998. Sustainability Strategies for Industry: The Future of Corporate Practice. Island Press: Washington, DC. Sagawa, S.E., Segal, R. and Kanter, M. 1999. Common Interest, Common Good: Creating Value through Business and Social Sector Partnerships. Harvard Business School: Boston. Santoro, M. 2000. Profits and Principles: Global Capitalism and Human Rights in China. Cornell University Press: Ithaca. Save the Children. 2001. Big Business, Small Hands: Responsible Approaches to Child Labour. Save the Children: London. Schmidheiny, S. 1992. A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment. MIT Press: Cambridge. Schmidheiny, S., Chase, R. and DeSimone, L. 1997. Signals of Change: Business Progress towards Sustainable Development. World Business Council for Sustainable Development: Geneva. Schwartz, P. and Gibb, B. 1999. When Good Companies Do Bad Things:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From Corporate Responsibility to Corporate Accountability
    Hastings Business Law Journal Volume 16 Number 1 Winter 2020 Article 3 Winter 2020 From Corporate Responsibility to Corporate Accountability Min Yan Daoning Zhang Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_business_law_journal Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons Recommended Citation Min Yan and Daoning Zhang, From Corporate Responsibility to Corporate Accountability, 16 Hastings Bus. L.J. 43 (2020). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_business_law_journal/vol16/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Business Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2 - YAN _ZHANG - V9 - KC - 10.27.19.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 11/15/2019 11:11 AM From Corporate Responsibility to Corporate Accountability Min Yan* and Daoning Zhang** I. INTRODUCTION The concept of corporate responsibility or corporate social responsibility (“CSR”) keeps evolving since it appeared. The emphasis was first placed on business people’s social conscience rather than on the company itself, which was well reflected by Howard Bowen’s landmark book, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman.1 Then CSR was defined as responsibilities to society, which extends beyond economic and legal obligations by corporations.2 Since then, corporate responsibility is thought to begin where the law ends. 3 In other words, the concept of social responsibility largely excludes legal obedience from the concept of social responsibility. An analysis of 37 of the most used definitions of CSR also shows “voluntary” as one of the most common dimensions.4 Put differently, corporate responsibility reflects the belief that corporations have duties beyond generating profits for their shareholders.
    [Show full text]
  • CSR in LEO Pharma - Focus Areas 2013-2016
    – Corporate Social Responsibility Report — we help people achieve healthy skin Environment & Safety People & Health Compliance & Ethics Partnerships & Collaboration Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) LEO Pharma CSR Report 2014 – Corporate Social Responsibility Report LEO Pharma in brief Founded in 1908 Headquarters in Denmark Offering care solutions to patients in more than 4,800 employees 100 Present in countries 61 countries with Owned by the LEO employees LEO Foundation Therapeutic areas Psoriasis Actinic keratosis Skin infections Eczema Acne Thrombosis Other areas of care Page – 2 Contents 5 Statement from the President & CEO 6 The commitment of LEO Pharma 7 LEO CSR Strategy 8 LEO Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Policy 9 CSR in LEO Pharma - Focus areas 2013-2016 10 Environment & Safety 14 People & Health 18 Compliance & Ethics 22 Partnerships & Collaboration 26 Appendix: Focus areas, goals and milestones 2013-2016 30 Glossary 31 LEO values 31 Contact This report represents LEO Pharma’s compliance with Section 99a and 99b of the Danish Financial Statements Act Page – 3 – Corporate Social Responsibility Report LEO mission We help people achieve healthy skin LEO vision We are the preferred dermatology care partner improving people’s lives around the world Page – 4 Statement from the President & CEO Dear stakeholders, Our mission in LEO Pharma is to help people achieve healthy skin and in 2014 we have helped 48 million patients. LEO Pharma is committed to changing the impact skin diseases have on people’s lives. In 2014, the WHO resolution on psoriasis was adopted, recognising psoriasis as a chronic and disabling disease – a significant step for patients worldwide – which LEO Pharma We help people achieve supports.
    [Show full text]
  • Eugenics and Domestic Science in the 1924 Sociological Survey of White Women in North Queensland
    This file is part of the following reference: Colclough, Gillian (2008) The measure of the woman : eugenics and domestic science in the 1924 sociological survey of white women in North Queensland. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/5266 THE MEASURE OF THE WOMAN: EUGENICS AND DOMESTIC SCIENCE IN THE 1924 SOCIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF WHITE WOMEN IN NORTH QUEENSLAND Thesis submitted by Gillian Beth COLCLOUGH, BA (Hons) WA on February 11 2008 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Arts and Social Sciences James Cook University Abstract This thesis considers experiences of white women in Queensland‟s north in the early years of „white‟ Australia, in this case from Federation until the late 1920s. Because of government and health authority interest in determining issues that might influence the health and well-being of white northern women, and hence their families and a future white labour force, in 1924 the Institute of Tropical Medicine conducted a comprehensive Sociological Survey of White Women in selected northern towns. Designed to address and resolve concerns of government and medical authorities with anxieties about sanitation, hygiene and eugenic wellbeing, the Survey used domestic science criteria to measure the health knowledge of its subjects: in so doing, it gathered detailed information about their lives. Guided by the Survey assessment categories, together with local and overseas literature on racial ideas, the thesis examines salient social and scientific concerns about white women in Queensland‟s tropical north and in white-dominated societies elsewhere and considers them against the oral reminiscences of women who recalled their lives in the North for the North Queensland Oral History Project.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Corporate Accountability?
    WHAT IS CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY? BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW Since the 1990s, the world has witnessed the growing importance and visibility of a range of initiatives led by businesses, social organisations and governments, with the stated aim of pressuring companies to behave in more socially responsible and accountable ways. This is a new development for many parts of the business world. Previously, the state (or government) was assumed to lead standard setting and behavioural norms for businesses in relation to most categories of stakeholders. When community organisations and interest groups wanted to change business behaviour, they focussed on changing the law. From the 1990s the focus changed, reflected in the emergence of new alliances and regimes of influence over business norms, linking together consumers, communities, workers and producers. What is the difference between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate accountability? Corporate responsibility, corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate accountability are sometimes confused or seen to be synonymous. However, corporate responsibility and corporate accountability are typically distinguished from one another along several lines. Corporate responsibility in its broadest sense refers to varied practices that reflect the belief that corporations have responsibilities beyond generating profit for their shareholders. Such responsibilities include the negative duty to refrain from harm caused to the environment, individuals or communities, and sometimes also positive duties to protect society and the environment, for example protecting human rights of workers and communities affected by business activities. Such responsibilities are generally considered to extend not only to direct social and environmental impacts of business activity, but also to more indirect effects resulting from relationships with business partners, such as those involved in global production chains.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Replace
    REPLACING GDP BY 2030 CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS BY RUTGER HOEKSTRA METRICSFORTHEFUTURE.COM The creation of the “GDP-multinational” The Ascent Golden Age Contested Hegemony Demise? 200 180 160 140 120 Studenski 100 United Nations 80 60 40 20 0 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 What happened in the “Golden Age”? Community Features Macro-economics (GDP multinational) Goal Economic Growth Community Policy Science Macro-economics Structure Accounting Framework System of National Accounts Key Indicator Gross Domestic Product Common Language System of National Accounts Institutionalisation √ But GDP is not a measure of well-being, inequality or sustainability “Beyond-GDP cottage industry” A selection of the many terms Adjusted Savings, Affect, A-growth, Basic Needs, Beyond-GDP, Carbon footprint, Capabilities, Capital Approach, Circular Economy, Comprehensive Wealth, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Cradle-to-Cradle, Current Wellbeing, Degradation, Depletion, De-Growth, Distribution, Ecological footprint, Economic wellbeing, Eco-System Services, Environmental Accounts, Footprint, Functionings, Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), Genuine Savings, Green Economy, Green Growth, Human Capital, Human Development Index (HDI), Human wellbeing, Inclusive Growth, Index of Social Economic Welfare (ISEW), Inclusive Wealth, Industrial ecology, Industrial Symbiosis, Inequality, Integrated Reporting, Investment, Life cycle analysis, Life satisfaction, Material flow analysis, Natural Capital, Natural Capital Accounting, Needs, Planetary
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) 2016
    Statutory report on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) 2016 Statutory report on Corporate Social Responsibility for the financial year 2016 cf. Section 99a and 99b of the Danish Financial Statements Act1. This report is a supplement to the Management’s review in the Annual Report 2016 covering the period January 1 – December 31, 2016. 1In Danish ‘Lovpligtig redegørelse for samfundsansvar, jf. årsregnskabsloven §99a og 99b’ Zealand Pharma A/S Smedeland 36 2600 Glostrup Denmark Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Report for 2016 Acting as a responsible part of society is a cornerstone in the way we conduct our business. Our behavior should benefit the patients we strive to help, our employees, shareholders and the wider community. Zealand and CSR Our Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) work is an integrated part of Zealand’s business, and the efforts in this area are based on our core values. We believe that Zealand has an obligation to be socially responsible in order to benefit not only our main stakeholders, mainly shareholders, patients and employees, but also society. A key focus for us across our business is to have open, engaging and respectful communication with all our stakeholders. Our CSR efforts are based on the most common elements of some of the most widely implemented CSR initiatives in the world, notably the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the United Nations Global Compact. Within these two systems, Zealand has found complementary frameworks for both guiding and reporting its CSR activities, along with several principles in the areas of labor, e environment, human rights and anticorruption. In addition to these, we have added a provisional category for animal rights, given the unique requirements of our industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Responsibilities of Business and Business Ethics
    CHAPTER 6 SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF BUSINESS AND BUSINESS ETHICS LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter, you should be able to: • explain the concept of social responsibility; • discuss the need for social responsibility; • identify the social responsibility towards different interest groups; • analyse the relationship between business and environmental protection; and • define the concept of business ethics and state the elements of business ethics. 2021-22 Chapter 6.indd 139 31-12-2020 11:55:58 140 BUSINESS STUDIES Mani is a young newspaper reporter and has been writing for almost six months on malpractices by business enterprises including such issues as misleading advertisements, supply of adulterated products, poor working conditions, environmental pollution, bribing government officials, and so on. He has started believing that business people tend to do anything to mint money. He happens to take an interview of Mr. Raman Jhunjhunwala, chairman of a leading truck manufacturing company which is known for its fair dealing with customers, employees, investors as well as other social groups. Through this interview, Mani develops the understanding that it is possible for a business enterprise to be socially responsible and ethically upright and, at the same time, be highly profitable. He then gets busy with studying more about the social responsibility of business and business ethics. 6.1 INTRODUCTION working conditions, honestly paying taxes prevention/installing pollution A business enterprise should do devices in the factory, and sincerely business and earn money in ways that attending to customer complaints are fulfill the expectations of the society. examples of socially desirable practices Every individual living in society has which improve the image of enterprises certain obligations towards society.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychological Well-Being of College Students: Validation of the Personal-Social Responsibility and Wellness Module
    Journal of Educational and Human Resource Development 8:59-70 (2020) Southern Leyte State University, Sogod, Southern Leyte, Philippines Psychological Well-Being of College Students: Validation of the Personal-Social Responsibility and Wellness Module *Gino A. Cabrera, Helene D. Daya Noreen P. Echague Southern Luzon State University Lucban, Quezon, Philippines Abstract The present study is the second phase of an earlier study that identified the psychological well-being (PWB) of college students in a state university in Quezon Province, Philippines. The findings of the previous study served as the basis for formulating and developing the Personal-Social Responsibility and Wellness (PSRW) course module, which is integrated into the new college curricula as a 3-unit subject. The course module aims to increase wellness and well-being among the students to cope with the demands of college life positively. This present study is the validation of the developed module. The validation is carried out using a combination of an ex post facto research that intends to measure the effectiveness of the course module in enhancing the PWB of the students and a predictive cross-sectional study to ascertain the socio-demographic predictors of PWB. This research involves 676 first-year students from six colleges of the main campus and eight satellite campuses of the university. Using Ryff’s PWB scale as pre- and post-test, paired sample t-test indicated a significant change in the six PWB dimensions such as autonomy, environmental mastery, personal growth, positive relations, purpose in life, and self-acceptance, and overall PWB of the students. Henceforth, results suggest the continued use of the developed evidence-informed module.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Through the Eyes of Consumers
    ISSN 1333-2422 UDK = 366.5 PRELIMINARY COMMUNICATION Corporate Social Responsibility through the eyes of consumers Tünde Csapóné Riskó1, Ádám Péntek2, Troy Wiwczaroski3 1Institute of Marketing and Commerce, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Debrecen, 138 Böszörményi str, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary 2Institute of Applied Informatics and Logistics, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Debrecen, 138 Böszörményi str, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary 3Institute of Economic Languages and Communication Studies, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Debrecen, 138 Böszörményi str, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary ABSTRACT Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is relevant to mainstream thought on economic organisations and their places in society. The aim of this paper is to collect some of the most relevant research findings on CSR, introduce the informedness of Hungarian respondents on CSR in general, the main influencing factors of their purchasing decisions, and to find correlations between the received results and the demographic variables based on our primary research. Our results support the present practice in terms of the definition of CSR. Almost all the listed alternatives are strongly associated with CSR by the respondents. The highest average received for the “creating work places, employment” alternative indicates the importance of this activity. Regarding the different factors influencing purchasing decision, our results underline the importance of price and price value ratio. Key words: CSR, conscious consumerism, CSR
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Social Responsibility: Who's Responsible?
    Corporate Social Responsibility: Who's Responsible? Finding an Organizational Home for an Increasingly Critical Function First Author: Julia Bonner M.S., New York University Second Author: Adam Friedman Professor, New York University Principal, Adam Friedman Associates LLC 1 Abstract Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is still a relatively new corporate function that continues to change and evolve. Research has not yet fully explored how CSR-related decisions are made within large companies and what departments have the most impact on CSR strategies. Using both quantitative and qualitative methods, this study examines how executives within Fortune 1000 organizations develop, measure and report the results of one particular aspect of their CSR initiatives. Results show that while the views and philosophies of the C-suite and board of directors are highly influential, other units and departments in the company are involved in the CSR process. The input of other company departments, notably the sales and marketing departments, indicate a linkage between CSR and profitability. Results also suggest the future of CSR as a corporate function may disappear as organizations begin to absorb its principles into the fabric of their respective businesses. Highlights Support from top management and the CEO is crucial in driving CSR communication and implementing the company’s CSR programs. Increasingly, many Fortune 1000 companies are using social media as part of the methodologies to assess their reputations and measure their CSR programs. External stakeholders are an important audience in the measurement process. The C-suite and board of directors are important influencers in setting CSR policies, but other departments are involved in the CSR process.
    [Show full text]
  • Csr Statements: Incentives and Enforcement in the Wake of the Business Roundtable’S Statement on Corporate Purpose
    CSR STATEMENTS: INCENTIVES AND ENFORCEMENT IN THE WAKE OF THE BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE’S STATEMENT ON CORPORATE PURPOSE Arielle Sigel* ABSTRACT Corporate social responsibility (“CSR”) statements—voluntary statements made by a corporation to improve its practices in three broad areas: environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”)—are increasingly expected from companies. Both consumers and investors are interested in whether companies are making efforts at social responsibility. In 2019, the Business Roundtable’s statement focused on CSR, emphasizing corporations’ commitment to stakeholders as well as shareholders. This statement signaled a broader shift away from for-profit companies’ profitability focus, and other prominent industry figures, such as BlackRock’s Larry Fink, continue to voice similar sentiments. The business judgment rule and related corporate law doctrines and cases, such as Dodge v. Ford, provide directors with a great deal of deference—within limits, of course—to make decisions that do not fulfill their primary duty of profit maximization. While CSR statements help companies by providing brand recognition, meeting consumer demand, and creating social good, these companies’ decisions to pursue CSR goals do not always align directly with maximizing profits. This creates a rift between directors’ and companies’ legal obligations and the trend of CSR and stakeholder theory. This Note seeks to close this rift by exploring the incentives behind CSR statements and explaining how directors can fulfill their duties by linking CSR statements to profits. In doing so, it concludes that CSR is a proper corporate purpose. CSR statements, with certain conditions placed on them, benefit both companies and society. If companies get to reap the reputational and financial benefits from making CSR statements, then companies must make good faith efforts to achieve their stated goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenge and Responsibility
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 280 781 SO 018 049 AUTHOR Molnar, Alex, Ed. TITLE Social Issues and Education: Challenge and Responsibility. SPONS AGENCY Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, Va. REPORT NO ISBN-0-87120-141-0 PUB DATE 87 NOTE 143p. AVAILABLE FROMAssociation for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 125 North West Street, Alexandria, VA 22314 (Stock No. 611-86048; $9.75). PUB TYPE Collected Works - General (020) -- Reports - Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS *Culture Conflict; Democratic Values; Elementary Secondary Education; *Homosexuality; Leisure Time; Lesbianism; Literacy; Play; *Quality of Life; *Social Problems; Social Responsibility; Social Values; *Textbook Content; *Track System (Education) ABSTRACT Social responsibility is a difficult but essential aspect of being a professional educator. The contributors to this volume hope that the social policy debate within the education profession will be encouraged. The book provides practical assistance for educators in developing curriculum and instruction programs that foster creativity and critical thinking in relation to social issues. In this volume are: "Forward" (Gerald R. Firth); "The Emperor Has No Clothes" (Alex Molnar); "Tracking: Beliefs, Practices, and Consequences" (Jeannie Oakes); "Confronting Social Attitudes in Textbooks: The Response and Responsibility of Today's Educator" (Steven Selden); "Children's Play and Adult Leisure: The Social Responsibility of Educators" (Nancy R. King); "Ethnic Diversity, the Social Responsibility of Educators, and School Reform" (James A. Banks); "Peering into the Well of Loneliness: The Responsibility of Educators to Gay and Lesbian Youth" (James T. Sears); "Educating for Excellence on an Endangered Planet" (Tony Wagner); "Literacy in a Democracy: Our Responsibility as Educators and Citizens" (Harold Berlak); and "Promoting Equity: The Forgotten Responsibility" (Vito Perrone).
    [Show full text]