Acute Myocardial Infarction After Use of Pseudoephedrine for Sinus Congestion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Acute Myocardial Infarction After Use of Pseudoephedrine for Sinus Congestion J Am Board Fam Pract: first published as 10.3122/jabfm.10.6.436 on 1 November 1997. Downloaded from BRIEl' RI~PORTS Acute Myocardial Infarction After Use of Pseudoephedrine for Sinus Congestion llector Derreza, MD, Michael D. Fine, M/), alld Ara Sadanimztz, MI) Coronary vasospasm has been recognized as an and walked 3 times per week for up to 1 hour with­ important factor for corollary atherogenesis and out chest pain. Since beginning the use of the sinus the development of symptoms associated with medication, he noted a mild chest pressure lasting coronary blood flow obstruction that can lead to from seconds to minutes that began 30 to 60 min­ ischemia and eventually myocardial infarction. 1 utes after ingestion of the sinus medication. He Association of drugs and coronary artery vaso­ had persistent sinus congestion before admission; spasm has been reported for such chemicals as in­ however, he was able to work and denied psy­ travenous ephedrine, cocaine, dipyridamole, tri­ chosocial stress. The day of admission he took his methaphan, and sumatriptan.2-fi Few cases have medication about 30 minutes before developing been reported in which pseudoephedrine is asso­ severe chest pressure similar in quality to previous ciated with myocardial infarction. Wiener et al fi episodes but greater in intensity. described a healthy 28-year-old man with no car­ On admission he was having severe chest pain. diac risk factors who had acute myocardial infarc­ His blood pressure was 180/115 mmHg, heart tion with ST segment elevation after taking 60 rate 66 beats per minute, and respiratory rate mg of pseudoephedrine. Subsequent coronary 26/min. He was diaphoretic, his jugular veins angiography showed normal coronary arteries in were not distended, his heart had a normal S 1 and this patient. We describe the association of angi­ S2, no Sl or S4, and no murmurs. Findings on an nal symptoms and eventual myocardial infarction abdominal examination were normal. His ex­ with ingestion of an over-the-counter remedy tremities had no edema, his pulses were palpable containing pseudoephedrine. bilaterally, and he had no cyanosis. Laboratory data on admission showed normal findings on a Case Report complete blood cell count and automated chem­ http://www.jabfm.org/ A 46-year-old man came to the hospital after an istry screening (sequential multiple analysis-7); acute onset of severe suhsternal chest pain associ­ his partial thromboplastin time was 25 sec, pro­ ated with mild shortness of breath and profuse di­ thrombin time 11.0 sec, international normalized aphoresis. His symptoms began 1 hour after taking ratio (INR) 0.9, magnesium 1.3 mEq, and creatine an over-the-counter medication containing 500 phosphokinase (CPK) 134 lUlL. Findings on his mg of acetaminophen and 15 mg of pseudo­ chest radiograph were normal. His electrocardio­ ephedrine hydrochloride, which he had been tak­ gram showed a normal sinus rhythm of 75 beats on 29 September 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. ing for 3 months for sinus congestion. He had per minute, a normal QRS axis, normal atrio­ been taking up to 1 tahlet every 6 hours. His car­ ventricular conduction, and 4-111l11 ST segll1ent el­ diac risk factors included male sex and heavy smok­ evations in the precordial leads V 1 through V, ing (30 pack-years), but his medical history was not (Figure 1). unusual. He had no family history of cardiac dis­ He received 4 sublingual nitroglycerin tablets ease and denied use of illegal drugs. He was taking and was given intravenous nitroglycerin. He sud­ no other medication. He worked as a truck driver denly developed transient monomorphic ventric­ ular tachycardia with a rate of 101 beats per minute, which resolved spontaneously. His elec­ Submitted, revised, 4.June I ()<)7. trocardiogram after this episode showed de­ From the Division of Cardiology, The Miriam j jospital, creased ST elevations and he became pain-free. It Brown University School of Ivledicine, Providence. Address reprint requests to Ara Sadaniantz, MD, Division of Cardiology, was thought that he spontaneously revascular­ The Miriam I Iospital, 164 Summit Ave, Providence, RI 02906. ized. He was admitted to the coronary care unit 436 JABFP Nov.-Dec.1997 Vol. 10 No.6 J Am Board Fam Pract: first published as 10.3122/jabfm.10.6.436 on 1 November 1997. Downloaded from Figure 1. The electrocardiogram showing 4-mm ST segment elevations in the precordial leads VI through V5 con­ sistent with an acute anterior myocardial infarction. on intravenous heparin and intravenous nitro­ spasm because of its sympathomimetic action.9 glycerin. He received 325 mg of chewable aspirin Age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, and serum levels and 25 mg of metoprolol orally. His first CPK of cholesterol and uric acid have no notable pre­ was 1701 lUlL with MB fraction of 155 ng/mL dictive value for coronary vasospasm. IO Dipyri­ and MB index of 9.1 percent (normal value for damole, trimethaphan, cocaine, ephedrine, and our laboratory is MB index less than 4 percent). A sumatriptan have also been associated with coro­ toxicology screening test of the urine was nega­ nary vasospasm.2-5 tive for cocaine. On his lipid profile he had a total We report a case in which the use of pseu­ cholesterol of 199 mg/dL, high-density lipopro­ doephedrine was associated with symptoms sug­ tein 66 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein 121 gestive of angina pectoris. Eventually the patient mg/dL, and triglyceride level 58 mg/dL. came to the emergency department with an acute He underwent cardiac catheterization on hospi­ myocardial infarction a fter taking pseudo­ http://www.jabfm.org/ tal day 2. The ventriculogram showed anterolat­ ephedrine and was found to have angiographically eral and apical hypokinesis with an ejection frac­ minimal coronary artery disease. Because of the tion of 50 percent. On coronary angiography the predictable association of developing symptoms mid-right coronary artery had 10 percent plaque, and the left anterior descending artery had mild plaques of 30 percent proximally and 20 percent at on 29 September 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. its mid portion (Figure 2). Nitroglycerin caused unbearable headaches and was discontinued. He was prescribed amlodipine 10 mg/d and was dis­ charged to home on hospital day 6 in good condi­ tion. He was advised to avoid the use of any sym­ pathomimetic agent. Nine months after discharge he remains free of anginal symptoms. Discussion Coronary artery spasm plays an important role in acute ischemic events, including acute myocardial infarction and exertional angina. I,7,s Smoking is Figure 2. Coronary angiography of the left coronary the most important risk factor for coronary artery system with mild plaques. Myocardial Infarction and Pseudoephedrine 437 J Am Board Fam Pract: first published as 10.3122/jabfm.10.6.436 on 1 November 1997. Downloaded from and the ingestion of the medication, it is highly of coronary artery spasm in acute myocardial infarc­ likely that there was a cause-and-effect relation. tion. Circulation 1977;56:366-74. He did not have symptoms of angina either be­ 2. Amin M, Gabelman G, Karpel], Buttrick P. Acute myocardial infarction and chest pain syndromes af­ fore starting or after stopping the medication. It ter cocaine use. Am J Cardiol 1990;66: 1434-7. is possible, but not likely, that the timing was co­ 3. Weinmann P, Le Guludec D, Moretti JL. Coronary incident and that he had an episode of variant spasm induced by dipyridamole during a myocardial angina independent of the pseudoephedrine. scintigraphy. lilt] CardioI1994;43:75-8. One other case of myocardial infarction, with 4. Higa K, Mori M, Shono S, Dan K. Trimethaphan ST segment elevations, associated with the use of may cause coronary artery spasm. Eur] Anaesthesiol 6 1995;12:529-32. pseudoephedrine has been reported. Pseudo­ 5. Lippolis A, Castini 0, Cirino D, Ornaghi M. Coro­ ephedrine is a congener of ephedrine, which has nary vasospasm secondary to subcutaneous admin­ both a direct and an indirect effect on sympa­ istration of sumatriptan. G Ital Cardiol 1994;24: thetic nerve endings. Side effects include hyper­ 883-6. tension, cardiac arrhythmias, and insomnia. 6. Wiener I, Tilkian AG, Palazzolo M. Coronary artery spasm and myocardial infarction in a patient Although not many cases of pseudoephedrine­ with normal coronary arteries: temporal relationship induced myocardial infarction have been previ­ to pseudoephedrine ingestion. Cathet Cardiovasc ously reported, this case provides evidence of a Diagn 1990;20:51-3. causal relation between pseudoephedrine use and 7. Chahine RA. [Role ofthe spasm in coronary pathol­ acute myocardial infarction in one susceptible pa­ ogy.] Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) 1982;31:563-70. tient. We question the safety of this medication in 8. Maseri A, Chierchia S, L'Abbate A, Biagini A, Dis­ tante A, Parodi 0, et al. [The role of spasm in angina over-the-counter preparations in susceptible pa­ pectoris, myocardial infarction and sudden death. tients and suggest awareness of this uncommon Indications for future research and treatment.] Arch but potentially fatal side effect. Further research Mal CoeurVaiss 1982;75:701-16. might be directed to recognition of persons sus­ 9. Ball K, Turner R. Smoking and the heart: the basis for action. Lancet 1974;2:822-6. ceptible to myocardial ischemia with this type of 10. Nobuyoshi M, Abe M, Nosaka H, Kimura T, Yokoi medication. H, Hamasaki N, et al. Statistical analysis of clinical risk factors for coronary artery spasm: identification References of the most important determinant. Am Heart ] 1. Oliva PB, Breckinridge]C. Arteriographic evidence 1992;124:32-8. http://www.jabfm.org/ on 29 September 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. 438 JABFP Nov.-Dec. 1997 Vo1.10No.6 .
Recommended publications
  • House Bill No. 2191
    SECOND REGULAR SESSION HOUSE BILL NO. 2191 99TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE QUADE. 5582H.01I D. ADAM CRUMBLISS, Chief Clerk AN ACT To repeal section 579.060, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof one new section relating to controlled substances, with penalty provisions. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows: Section A. Section 579.060, RSMo, is repealed and one new section enacted in lieu 2 thereof, to be known as section 579.060, to read as follows: 579.060. 1. A person commits the offense of unlawful sale, distribution, or purchase of 2 over-the-counter methamphetamine precursor drugs if he or she knowingly: 3 (1) Sells, distributes, dispenses, or otherwise provides any number of packages of any 4 drug product containing detectable amounts of ephedrine, levomethamphetamine, 5 phenylpropanolamine, propylhexedrine, or pseudoephedrine, or any of their salts, optical 6 isomers, or salts of optical isomers, in a total amount greater than nine grams to the same 7 individual within a thirty-day period, unless the amount is dispensed, sold, or distributed 8 pursuant to a valid prescription; or 9 (2) Purchases, receives, or otherwise acquires within a thirty-day period any number of 10 packages of any drug product containing any detectable amount of ephedrine, 11 levomethamphetamine, phenylpropanolamine, propylhexedrine, or pseudoephedrine, or any 12 of their salts or optical isomers, or salts of optical isomers in a total amount greater than nine 13 grams, without regard to the number of transactions, unless the amount is purchased, received, 14 or acquired pursuant to a valid prescription; or 15 (3) Purchases, receives, or otherwise acquires within a twenty-four-hour period any 16 number of packages of any drug product containing any detectable amount of ephedrine, 17 levomethamphetamine, phenylpropanolamine, propylhexedrine, or pseudoephedrine, or any EXPLANATION — Matter enclosed in bold-faced brackets [thus] in the above bill is not enacted and is intended to be omitted from the law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stimulants and Hallucinogens Under Consideration: a Brief Overview of Their Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 17 (1986) 107-118 107 Elsevier Scientific Publishers Ireland Ltd. THE STIMULANTS AND HALLUCINOGENS UNDER CONSIDERATION: A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THEIR CHEMISTRY AND PHARMACOLOGY LOUIS S. HARRIS Dcparlmcnl of Pharmacology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth Unwersity, Richmond, VA 23298 (U.S.A.) SUMMARY The substances under review are a heterogenous set of compounds from a pharmacological point of view, though many have a common phenylethyl- amine structure. Variations in structure lead to marked changes in potency and characteristic action. The introductory material presented here is meant to provide a set of chemical and pharmacological highlights of the 28 substances under con- sideration. The most commonly used names or INN names, Chemical Abstract (CA) names and numbers, and elemental formulae are provided in the accompanying figures. This provides both some basic information on the substances and a starting point for the more detailed information that follows in the individual papers by contributors to the symposium. Key words: Stimulants, their chemistry and pharmacology - Hallucinogens, their chemistry and pharmacology INTRODUCTION Cathine (Fig. 1) is one of the active principles of khat (Catha edulis). The structure has two asymmetric centers and exists as two geometric isomers, each of which has been resolved into its optical isomers. In the plant it exists as d-nor-pseudoephedrine. It is a typical sympathomimetic amine with a strong component of amphetamine-like activity. The racemic mixture is known generically in this country and others as phenylpropanolamine (dl- norephedrine). It is widely available as an over-the-counter (OTC) anti- appetite agent and nasal decongestant.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudoephedrine Smurfing Fuels Surge in Large-Scale
    ARCHIVED LIMITED OFFICIAL USE-LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY U.S. Department of Justice National Drug Intelligence Center June 2009 Situation Report Product No. 2009-S0787-007 Pseudoephedrine Smurfing Fuels Surge in Large-Scale Methamphetamine Production in California Preface This Situation Report is in response to a request from the Office of National Drug Control Policy for information regarding pseudoephedrine smurfing in California. The National Drug Intelligence Center collected and analyzed data and reporting from 2007 through May 2009 related to metham- phetamine production and pseudoephedrine smurfing. This report draws upon data from the National Seizure System (NSS) as well as information obtained through interviews with federal, state, and local law enforcement officers. Executive Summary Pseudoephedrine smurfinga has become increasingly organized and widespread in California, par- ticularly since 2007, fueling an increase in the number of large-scale methamphetamine laboratories in the state.1 Among the increased number of large-scale laboratories are those operated by Mexican criminal groups that have relocated to California from Mexico since 2007. Mexican criminal groups and some independent operators are increasingly acquiring bulk quantities of pseudoephedrine through smurfing. Despite strong efforts by law enforcement to curtail smurfing, there is no indication that this practice will decline in the near term. In fact, pseudoephedrine acquired through smurfing in California in 2009 was sent in bulk to methamphetamine producers in Mexico, an indication that some criminal groups in Mexico still find it easier to acquire pseudoephedrine through smurfing in California than from other sources. Discussion Pseudoephedrine smurfing increased significantly in California in 2008 and early 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Methamphetamine Manufactured from Pseudoephedrine; Both As Double
    2019 Methamphetamine Manufactured from Pseudoephedrine; Both as Double- Edged Swords Fanak Fahimi* *Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Received: 2019-12-20, Revised: 2019-12-21, Accept: 2019-12-22, Published: 2019-12-31 A R T I C L E I N F O Article type: Editorial J Pharm Care 2019; 7(4):80-81. Please cite this paper as: Fahimi F. Methamphetamine Manufactured from Pseudoephedrine; Both as Double-Edged Swords. J Pharm Care 2019; 7(4): 80-81. Methamphetamine, or meth, is a potent stimulant that meth. The regulation was effective from September 2006 is prescribed for psychiatric conditions such as attention (8). So, by law the following were required: deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and weight issues. All pseudoephedrine containing OTC medicines should Contrariwise, this agent is more used recreationally for be sold from behind a sales counter and limits of 3.6 energy boosting and feelings of strength it creates. grams per day or 9 grams per 30 days. The medicine is Pseudoephedrine (PSE) is the key ingredient used to only sold to patient who presents a formal identification produce methamphetamine. Pseudoephedrine has one card and provide personal information which will be kept less hydroxyl group compared to another commonly used in the pharmacy for 2 years. sympathomimetic in cold and allergy products which Meth lab numbers dropped by more than 65% in 2007 results in a more lipid soluble molecule and thus more following this law. Sadly, meth lab events remained high or central nervous system (CNS) availability (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis Of
    Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-0, Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org RECOMMENDED METHODS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AMPHETAMINE, METHAMPHETAMINE AND THEIR RING-SUBSTITUTED ANALOGUES IN SEIZED MATERIALS (revised and updated) MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG TESTING LABORATORIES Laboratory and Scientific Section United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Vienna RECOMMENDED METHODS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AMPHETAMINE, METHAMPHETAMINE AND THEIR RING-SUBSTITUTED ANALOGUES IN SEIZED MATERIALS (revised and updated) MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG TESTING LABORATORIES UNITED NATIONS New York, 2006 Note Mention of company names and commercial products does not imply the endorse- ment of the United Nations. This publication has not been formally edited. ST/NAR/34 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.06.XI.1 ISBN 92-1-148208-9 Acknowledgements UNODC’s Laboratory and Scientific Section wishes to express its thanks to the experts who participated in the Consultative Meeting on “The Review of Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Amphetamine-type Stimulants (ATS) and Their Ring-substituted Analogues in Seized Material” for their contribution to the contents of this manual. Ms. Rosa Alis Rodríguez, Laboratorio de Drogas y Sanidad de Baleares, Palma de Mallorca, Spain Dr. Hans Bergkvist, SKL—National Laboratory of Forensic Science, Linköping, Sweden Ms. Warank Boonchuay, Division of Narcotics Analysis, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand Dr. Rainer Dahlenburg, Bundeskriminalamt/KT34, Wiesbaden, Germany Mr. Adrian V. Kemmenoe, The Forensic Science Service, Birmingham Laboratory, Birmingham, United Kingdom Dr. Tohru Kishi, National Research Institute of Police Science, Chiba, Japan Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 1This Action Arises Under the Patent Laws of the United States. See 35 U.S.C
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MCNEIL-PPC, INC., : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : L. PERRIGO COMPANY, : and PERRIGO COMPANY, : No. 01-1100 Defendants. : OPINION AND ORDER SCHILLER, J. June , 2002 This is a patent infringement action. Plaintiff McNeil-PPC, Inc. (“McNeil”) alleges Defendants L. Perrigo Company and Perrigo Company (collectively “Perrigo”) infringe four McNeil patents covering a popular version of the Imodium® Advanced antidiarrheal. In a Memorandum and Order issued April 3, 2002, I construed certain disputed claim terms pursuant to Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc. , 517 U.S. 370 (1996). Beginning April 22, 2002, this matter was tried without a jury, and I enter the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as required by Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 FINDINGS OF FACT I. BACKGROUND This action pits a manufacturer of national brand pharmaceuticals against its competitor, a generic drug manufacturer. Four patents owned by Plaintiff McNeil are at issue in this case: United States Patents 5,248,505 (“the ’505 patent”)(PTX1) and 5,612,054 (“the ’054 patent”)(PTX2) are 1This action arises under the patent laws of the United States. See 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2) and 21 U.S.C. § 355(j). Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(c) and 1400(b). referred to as “the Garwin patents”; 2 United States Patents 5,679,376 (“the ’376 patent”)(PTX3) and 5,716,641 (“the ’641 patent”)(PTX4) are referred to as “the Stevens patents.” A.
    [Show full text]
  • Methamphetamine Use: Lessons Learned
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Methamphetamine Use: Lessons Learned Author(s): Dana Hunt, Ph.D.; Sarah Kuck; Linda Truitt, Ph.D. Document No.: 209730 Date Received: February 2006 Award Number: 99-C-008 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. ANALYTIC SUPPORT PROGRAM CONTRACT TASK REQUIREMENT T-043: Methamphetamine Use: Lessons Learned Contract No. 99-C-008 Cambridge, MA Lexington, MA Hadley, MA Bethesda, MD Chicago, IL January 31, 2006 Prepared for Raymond C. German Contracting Officer Christine Crossland Senior Social Science Analyst National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs Acquisition Management Division 810 Seventh Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20001 Prepared by Dana Hunt, Ph.D. Sarah Kuck Abt Associates Inc. Linda Truitt, Ph.D. 55 Wheeler Street Cambridge, MA 02138 Contents Executive Summary...............................................................................................................iii History of Methamphetamine Use .................................................................................iii Trends.............................................................................................................................iii
    [Show full text]
  • Prescription Stimulants (Canadian Drug Summary)
    www.ccsa.ca • www.cclt.ca June 2016 Canadian Drug Summary Prescription Stimulants Key points The use of prescription stimulants among the Canadian general population is about 1% and has remained relatively stable since 2008. In Canada, the rate of prescription stimulant use is highest among youth. There is little Canadian data available on the harms associated with prescription stimulant use and misuse. Introduction Stimulants are a broad category of substances that act to increase the level of activity of the central nervous system. The category includes commonly used substances such as caffeine and nicotine, over-the-counter decongestants (e.g., pseudoephedrine), illegal drugs (e.g., cocaine, methamphetamine), and prescription medications. Although the category of stimulants includes many substances, this drug summary focuses on prescription stimulants. The most common use of prescription stimulants is to treat individuals diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Other medical uses for prescription stimulants include the treatment of narcolepsy and other sleep disorders. Table 1 lists examples of the generic, trade and street names for some common prescription stimulants. Table 1. Common generic, trade and street names for stimulants Generic name Trade name Street names Methylphenidate Ritalin®, Concerta®, Biphentin® Vitamin R, skippy, rids, uppers Dextroamphetamine Dexedrine® bennies, black beauties, hearts Amphetamine and dextroamphetamine Adderall® Beans, dexies, amps Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate Vyvanse® Vanies Prescription stimulants are normally taken in pill form for medical uses, but some people tamper with the pills to obtain euphoric effects from them. Such tampering can cause complications, such as blockage of small blood vessels due to insoluble fillers in the tablets, infections at the injection site, and rapid onset of effects that can cause blood pressure and heart rate to spike.
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical Listing of ATC Drugs & Codes
    Alphabetical Listing of ATC drugs & codes. Introduction This file is an alphabetical listing of ATC codes as supplied to us in November 1999. It is supplied free as a service to those who care about good medicine use by mSupply support. To get an overview of the ATC system, use the “ATC categories.pdf” document also alvailable from www.msupply.org.nz Thanks to the WHO collaborating centre for Drug Statistics & Methodology, Norway, for supplying the raw data. I have intentionally supplied these files as PDFs so that they are not quite so easily manipulated and redistributed. I am told there is no copyright on the files, but it still seems polite to ask before using other people’s work, so please contact <[email protected]> for permission before asking us for text files. mSupply support also distributes mSupply software for inventory control, which has an inbuilt system for reporting on medicine usage using the ATC system You can download a full working version from www.msupply.org.nz Craig Drown, mSupply Support <[email protected]> April 2000 A (2-benzhydryloxyethyl)diethyl-methylammonium iodide A03AB16 0.3 g O 2-(4-chlorphenoxy)-ethanol D01AE06 4-dimethylaminophenol V03AB27 Abciximab B01AC13 25 mg P Absorbable gelatin sponge B02BC01 Acadesine C01EB13 Acamprosate V03AA03 2 g O Acarbose A10BF01 0.3 g O Acebutolol C07AB04 0.4 g O,P Acebutolol and thiazides C07BB04 Aceclidine S01EB08 Aceclidine, combinations S01EB58 Aceclofenac M01AB16 0.2 g O Acefylline piperazine R03DA09 Acemetacin M01AB11 Acenocoumarol B01AA07 5 mg O Acepromazine N05AA04
    [Show full text]
  • Medications to Be Avoided Or Used with Caution in Parkinson's Disease
    Medications To Be Avoided Or Used With Caution in Parkinson’s Disease This medication list is not intended to be complete and additional brand names may be found for each medication. Every patient is different and you may need to take one of these medications despite caution against it. Please discuss your particular situation with your physician and do not stop any medication that you are currently taking without first seeking advice from your physician. Most medications should be tapered off and not stopped suddenly. Although you may not be taking these medications at home, one of these medications may be introduced while hospitalized. If a hospitalization is planned, please have your neurologist contact your treating physician in the hospital to advise which medications should be avoided. Medications to be avoided or used with caution in combination with Selegiline HCL (Eldepryl®, Deprenyl®, Zelapar®), Rasagiline (Azilect®) and Safinamide (Xadago®) Medication Type Medication Name Brand Name Narcotics/Analgesics Meperidine Demerol® Tramadol Ultram® Methadone Dolophine® Propoxyphene Darvon® Antidepressants St. John’s Wort Several Brands Muscle Relaxants Cyclobenzaprine Flexeril® Cough Suppressants Dextromethorphan Robitussin® products, other brands — found as an ingredient in various cough and cold medications Decongestants/Stimulants Pseudoephedrine Sudafed® products, other Phenylephrine brands — found as an ingredient Ephedrine in various cold and allergy medications Other medications Linezolid (antibiotic) Zyvox® that inhibit Monoamine oxidase Phenelzine Nardil® Tranylcypromine Parnate® Isocarboxazid Marplan® Note: Additional medications are cautioned against in people taking Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI), including other opioids (beyond what is mentioned in the chart above), most classes of antidepressants and other stimulants (beyond what is mentioned in the chart above).
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DIX to the HTSUS—Continued
    20558 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DEPARMENT OF THE TREASURY Services, U.S. Customs Service, 1301 TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL APPEN- Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DIX TO THE HTSUSÐContinued Customs Service D.C. 20229 at (202) 927±1060. CAS No. Pharmaceutical [T.D. 95±33] Dated: April 14, 1995. 52±78±8 ..................... NORETHANDROLONE. A. W. Tennant, 52±86±8 ..................... HALOPERIDOL. Pharmaceutical Tables 1 and 3 of the Director, Office of Laboratories and Scientific 52±88±0 ..................... ATROPINE METHONITRATE. HTSUS 52±90±4 ..................... CYSTEINE. Services. 53±03±2 ..................... PREDNISONE. 53±06±5 ..................... CORTISONE. AGENCY: Customs Service, Department TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL 53±10±1 ..................... HYDROXYDIONE SODIUM SUCCI- of the Treasury. NATE. APPENDIX TO THE HTSUS 53±16±7 ..................... ESTRONE. ACTION: Listing of the products found in 53±18±9 ..................... BIETASERPINE. Table 1 and Table 3 of the CAS No. Pharmaceutical 53±19±0 ..................... MITOTANE. 53±31±6 ..................... MEDIBAZINE. Pharmaceutical Appendix to the N/A ............................. ACTAGARDIN. 53±33±8 ..................... PARAMETHASONE. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the N/A ............................. ARDACIN. 53±34±9 ..................... FLUPREDNISOLONE. N/A ............................. BICIROMAB. 53±39±4 ..................... OXANDROLONE. United States of America in Chemical N/A ............................. CELUCLORAL. 53±43±0
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudoephedrine and Ephedrine: Managing the Risk of Medicines Misuse
    Pseudoephedrine and ephedrine: managing the risk of medicines misuse MHRA UK Public Assessment Report June 2017 Plain language summary 2 1. Introduction 5 2. Background 5 3. Update on implementation of management measures 6 3.1 Pharmacy supervision plus education and awareness initiatives 7 3.2 Pharmacy reporting of suspicions 7 3.3 Sales monitoring for evidence of use of over-the-counter medicines in the manufacture of methylamphetamine 8 3.4 Triggers for a review of the availability of pseudoephedrine or ephedrine over-the-counter medicines 8 4. International position 9 5. Discussion 9 6. Recommendations and conclusions 10 7. Glossary 11 1 PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Key message: In 2008, legal measures were introduced in the UK to manage the misuse of medicines containing pseudoephedrine or ephedrine. A review of evidence conducted in 2016 shows that the measures are continuing to effectively manage the risk of misuse of these medicines. Background The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is the government agency responsible for regulating medicines and medical devices in the UK. We continually review the safety of medicines and vaccines in the UK. We inform healthcare professionals and the public of the latest updates through several means, including public assessment reports. The following report presents the 2016 review of the impact of measures introduced to control the potential misuse of medicines containing pseudoephedrine or ephedrine. These measures were introduced in 2007–2008, and their impact has been reviewed yearly. Pseudoephedrine and ephedrine are nasal decongestantsa contained in many cough and cold medicines sold over-the-counter (OTC) in UK pharmacies.
    [Show full text]