Ecological Surveys of Saline Lagoons on the Benacre NNR and Suffolk Coast NNR February 2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecological Surveys of Saline Lagoons on the Benacre NNR and Suffolk Coast NNR February 2012 Saline Lagoon Survey, Benacre NNR and Suffolk Coast NNR, 2012 1 Ecological Surveys of Saline Lagoons on the Benacre NNR and Suffolk Coast NNR February 2012. An ecological survey including floral and fauna observations undertaken for Natural England by Abrehart Ecology. Defra License number:----------- abrehart ecology Carried out by Toby R. Abrehart FLS Dr Simon J. Forster Pound Farm Low Road Great Glemham Suffolk IP17 2DQ Tel: 01728 663282 - 07798 941555 Abrehart Ecology Natural England Saline Lagoon Survey, Benacre NNR and Suffolk Coast NNR, 2012 2 C O N T E N T S Page Summary 4 1. Introduction and background 8 2. Materials and methods 9 2.1 The field survey and sample collection 9 2.2 Laboratory procedures and analyses 11 3. Site-by-site results 12 3.1 Benacre Pit 12 3.2 Benacre Broad 15 3.3 Covehithe Broad 26 3.4 Easton Broad 28 3.5 Reedland Marsh 30 4. General discussion 59 4.1 Benacre Pit 59 4.2 Benacre Broad 60 4.3 Covehithe Broad 62 4.4 Easton Broad 63 4.5 Reedland Marsh 64 5. Acknowledgements 65 6. References cited in text 65 Abrehart Ecology Natural England Saline Lagoon Survey, Benacre NNR and Suffolk Coast NNR, 2012 3 Appendices: Appendix A Taxonomic list for the macrofaunal species recorded in the sweep net samples collected during the Suffolk saline lagoon survey, February 2012. Appendix B Site-by-site results for the macrofaunal species recorded in the sweep net samples collected during the Suffolk saline lagoon survey, February 2012. Appendix C Location figures and photographs of the lagoons and sampling sites assessed during the Suffolk saline lagoon survey, February 2012. Abrehart Ecology Natural England Saline Lagoon Survey, Benacre NNR and Suffolk Coast NNR, 2012 4 Summary Background Abrehart Ecology was requested by Natural England to undertake an ecological assessment survey of selected saline lagoons on the Suffolk coast. Previous studies had been undertaken in 1996 (Bamber, 1997) and 1998 (Bamber, 1999). The aim of the survey was to provide an update as to the ecological status of the selected lagoons and to provide Natural England with relevant data to enable informed managerial decisions to be made in the future. The survey was undertaken between 16 - 18 February 2012. The findings Benacre Pit Benacre Pit supported the most diverse and abundant aquatic plant and animal communities recorded in the lagoons that were assessed during the February 2012 survey. A range of archetypal lagoon species were documented included the protected species Nematostella vectensis (Starlet Sea Anemone) and Gammarus insensibilis (Lagoon Sand Shrimp). To determine the full ecological and conservational value of Benacre Pit, it is recommended that a detailed survey of the N. vectensis and G. insensibilis population as well as the aquatic plants is undertaken at a more appropriate time of year (for example late summer 2012). The principal threat to the Benacre Pit saline lagoon habitat appeared to be associated with the encroachment and/or breaching of the shingle embankment on the eastern (seaward) side of the site. Benacre Broad To mitigate coastal erosion, a number of the small pools were created in 1996 to provide additional lagoon habitat. Prior to November 2011, Benacre Broad Lagoon had been a stable, near freshwater system for four years. In November Abrehart Ecology Natural England Saline Lagoon Survey, Benacre NNR and Suffolk Coast NNR, 2012 5 2011 the shingle bank at the eastern end of Benacre Broad was over-topped and this, ostensibly freshwater, lagoon was filled with sea water. The 2011 inundation event caused the main broad to briefly become fully saline, this was then diluted with freshwater inputs from the sluices at the western end of the broad. The previously shallow “lagoon” pools had been submerged under deep water and in-filled with fine sediment for over four years. Within the main body of water, the floral and faunal assemblages were poor. The estuarine amphipod Corophium volutator had become dominant and was recorded at very high densities at a number of sites. Conversely, the low salinity amphipod, Corophium multisetosum, previously recorded by Bamber (1999), was not observed. No Nematostella vectensis was recorded. It is considered that the habitat within the eastern section of the main broad is no longer suitable for this species. The western-most sampling sites were separated from the main broad by a clay bund. At the time of sampling, the conditions at these sites were freshwater. In the freshwater site there was evidence of eutrophication of the water, including the presence of large quantities of the cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) Nostoc species. It appears that nutrient-rich run-off from farmland may cause the apparent eutrophication and that this may represent an immediate threat to the water quality, and hence the ecological value, of the Benacre Broad aquatic system. Covehithe Broad Over recent years, Covehithe Broad has been reduced in size due to coastal erosion and the encroachment of sand and gravel. Evidence indicated this process was continuing. This is a significant threat to the lagoon habitat. The flora and fauna of Covehithe Broad was very poor. No previous data was available for the invertebrates’ communities. However, a demonstrable decline of the aquatic floral community had occurred over the past decade. There were indications that the water was eutrophic. It appeared that a potential source of nutrient-rich waters was surface run-off from the Abrehart Ecology Natural England Saline Lagoon Survey, Benacre NNR and Suffolk Coast NNR, 2012 6 adjacent free-range pig farms. Further investigations to determine the current water quality status of Covehithe lagoon and the source and pathway of any nutrient-rich materials entering the water body is recommended. Easton Broad Easton Broad was a low salinity lagoon system, at the time of the survey the salinity was 0 ‰. The extent of the water body had been reduced by sand encroachment. This process was continuing. The flora and fauna at Easton Broad was generally poor in terms of abundance and number of species. There was also evidence of eutrophication. The endangered (RDB 1) snail, Mercuria (=Pseudamnicola) confusa, was recorded from the edge of the Phragmites bed at the south-eastern end of the lagoon. The continued existence of M. confusa is threatened by (i) the continued encroachment of the sand and (ii) the potential for persistent salinity increases due to regular over-topping of the sand dune coastal embankment. It is recommended that targeted assessment of M. confusa and suitable habitats within the local area is undertaken to enable appropriate mitigation and/or habitat enhancement measures to be undertaken. Reedland Marshes The Reedland Marshes lagoons continue to support a relatively wide range of lagoon and estuarine invertebrates. A very similar array of species was recorded during the previous survey of this area during 1998. The species of particular conservational importance was the scheduled species Nematostella vectensis and Gammarus insensibilis. The occurrence and abundance of the Starlet Sea Anemone, Nematostella vectensis, was significantly reduced at the time of the February 2012 survey compared to the results of the previous 1998 survey. However, it is likely that this was due to the time of year at which the surveys were undertaken. Abrehart Ecology Natural England Saline Lagoon Survey, Benacre NNR and Suffolk Coast NNR, 2012 7 The encroachment of the shingle embankment had reduced the number and area of saline lagoons. This was particularly apparent at the northern end of the Reedland Marshes survey area. It was noted that encroaching shingle provided a suitable substrata for coastal vegetated shingle, a Biodiversity Action Plan priority habitat. Evidence of tidal variations in the water depth within the lagoons in the mid- and southern sections of the Reedland Marsh survey area was noted. At the time of the survey a number of sites had up to 90% of the lagoon substrate exposed. It was suggested that tidal conditions would diminish the potential of the sites to support specialist lagoon floral and fauna species. Abrehart Ecology Natural England Saline Lagoon Survey, Benacre NNR and Suffolk Coast NNR, 2012 8 1. Introduction and background Abrehart Ecology was requested by Adam Burrows (Senior Reserves Manager, Suffolk Coast National Nature Reserves) of Natural England to undertake an ecological assessment survey of selected saline lagoons on the Suffolk coast. Previous studies had been undertaken in 1996 (Bamber, 1997) and 1998 (Bamber, 1999). The saline lagoons of the Suffolk coast are, in the absence of expensive coastal defence measures, threatened by coastal erosion and the relentless encroachment of the sand and shingle into the marshland environment. In addition, inundation events, such as breaches in, and over-topping of, the coastal defence embankments and have caused dramatic, rapid changes in the physical conditions of coastal water bodies. The objectives of the 2012 saline lagoon survey were: to provide an indication of the diversity and species structure of the invertebrate and plant communities that currently exist in the selected saline lagoons, to determine and document any changes in the conditions of the lagoon and their associated floral and faunal communities since the previous survey was undertaken, to provide baseline information against which (i) any future changes in the lagoon conditions could be compared and (ii) the success of any mitigation and/or habitat enhancement measure could be evaluated, and to provide Natural England with valuable information to enable informed decisions regarding the future management of the coastal lagoon systems to be made. Abrehart Ecology Natural England Saline Lagoon Survey, Benacre NNR and Suffolk Coast NNR, 2012 9 2. Materials and methods 2.1 The field survey and sample collection The saline lagoon survey was undertaken by Abrehart Ecology between 16 - 18 February 2012.
Recommended publications
  • Phragmites Australis
    Journal of Ecology 2017, 105, 1123–1162 doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12797 BIOLOGICAL FLORA OF THE BRITISH ISLES* No. 283 List Vasc. PI. Br. Isles (1992) no. 153, 64,1 Biological Flora of the British Isles: Phragmites australis Jasmin G. Packer†,1,2,3, Laura A. Meyerson4, Hana Skalov a5, Petr Pysek 5,6,7 and Christoph Kueffer3,7 1Environment Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; 2School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; 3Institute of Integrative Biology, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, CH-8092, Zurich,€ Switzerland; 4University of Rhode Island, Natural Resources Science, Kingston, RI 02881, USA; 5Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-25243, Pruhonice, Czech Republic; 6Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, CZ-12844, Prague 2, Czech Republic; and 7Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland 7602, South Africa Summary 1. This account presents comprehensive information on the biology of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. (P. communis Trin.; common reed) that is relevant to understanding its ecological char- acteristics and behaviour. The main topics are presented within the standard framework of the Biologi- cal Flora of the British Isles: distribution, habitat, communities, responses to biotic factors and to the abiotic environment, plant structure and physiology, phenology, floral and seed characters, herbivores and diseases, as well as history including invasive spread in other regions, and conservation. 2. Phragmites australis is a cosmopolitan species native to the British flora and widespread in lowland habitats throughout, from the Shetland archipelago to southern England.
    [Show full text]
  • 46 Cyclus De Dieren Zijn Van Gescheiden Geslacht. De
    de nederlandse biodiversiteit Animalia ▶ Mollusca (fylum) ▶ Gastropoda (klasse) ▶ Neritimorpha (subklasse) NeRitiMORPHA - NeRieteN nederland 1 gevestigd jeroeN GOUD & A.j. (Ton) De WiNteR wereld ca. 500 beschreven Nerieten hebben een stevige, meestal gewonden schelp en Diversiteit een opvallend verkalkt operculum, veelal met een of meer Wereldwijd zijn er ongeveer 500 soorten beschreven (t. uitsteeksels (apophysen). Soms is de schelp echter napvor- eichhorst pers. med.). in Nederland komt slechts één soort mig (bij Septaria) en er is zelfs een ‘naaktslak’ bekend. De voor: de zoetwaterneriet Theodoxus fluviatilis. schelp varieert in grootte van minder dan mm (Georissa) tot enkele centimeters. Nerieten leven in zout, brak en zoet Voorkomen water en ook op het land. Nerieten leven vooral in zee, maar ook in zoet water en sommige soorten pendelen zelfs heen en weer tussen de ver- Cyclus schillende watertypen. enkele groepen leven op het land De zoetwaterneriet Theodoxus fluviatilis zet eikapsels ge- (Hydrocena, Georissa en de tropische familie Helicinidae). durende het zomerhalfjaar af op harde substraten. De Theodoxus fluviatilis komt in de westelijke helft van Neder- vroeg in het jaar geboren dieren kunnen zich hetzelfde jaar land voor, in zoet water en soms in brak water. Deze soort weer voortplanten. De dieren worden doorgaans twee jaar lijkt achteruit te gaan en staat als kwetsbaar op de Rode oud (GittenbergeR et Al. 1998, 2004). lijst (De bruyNe et Al. 2003). Ecologie Determinatie Nerieten zijn over het algemeen grazers van algen, kiezel- GitteNBergeR et Al. 1998, 2004. wieren en detritus (liNDBerg 2008). Animalia ▶ Mollusca (fylum) ▶ Gastropoda (klasse) ▶ Caenogastropoda (subklasse) CAeNOGAStROPODA - NieUWe SlAKKeN nederland 47 gevestigd (waarvan 6 exoten) jeroeN GOUD & A.j.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Mercuria Boeters, 1971 in France (Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda: Hydrobiidae)
    The genus Mercuria Boeters, 1971 in France (Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda: Hydrobiidae). West-European Hydrobiidae, Part 13 Hans D. BOETERS Karneidstraße 8, DE-81545 München (Germany) Gerhard FALKNER Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, DE-70191 Stuttgart (Germany) and Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 57 rue Cuvier, F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) [email protected] Published on 30 June 2017 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:85C208C7-6471-4E6F-A53A-BB1AFB4F9BEB Boeters H. D. & Falkner G. 2017. — The genus Mercuria Boeters, 1971 in France (Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda: Hydrobiidae). West-European Hydrobiidae, Part 13. Zoosystema 39 (2): 227-261. https://doi.org/10.5252/z2017n2a4 ABSTRACT Th e Mercuria Boeters, 1971 species living in the coastal zones of France are reviewed. In the Atlantic zone the genus Mercuria comprises four species: M. anatina (Poiret, 1801), M. baudoniana (Gassies, 1859), M. bayonnensis (Locard, 1894) and M. sarahae (Paladilhe, 1869); in the Mediterranean zone we discriminate three species: M. meridionalis (Risso, 1826), M. similis (Draparnaud, 1805), and M. corsensis n. sp. Mercuria sarahae is represented by two subspecies, M. s. sarahae and M. s. vindilica (Paladilhe, 1870). Mercuria corsensis n. sp., a close sister species to the Sardinian M. zopissa (Paulucci, 1882) lives only in the extreme South of Corsica. Amnicola emiliana Paladilhe, 1869, does not be- long to the genus Mercuria but must be attributed to Pseudamnicola Paulucci, 1878. Lectotypes for Bythinia [sic] bayonnensis Locard, 1894, Bythinia [sic] baudoniana Gassies, 1859, Amnicola lanceolata Paladilhe, 1869, Amnicola sarahae Paladilhe, 1869, Amnicola vindilica Paladilhe, 1870 and Bithynia meridionalis Risso, 1826 are designated. For Amnicola emiliana a neotype is designated.
    [Show full text]
  • MW13 Art for PS 14/10/2009 20:22 Page 1
    MW13 visual:MW13 art for PS 14/10/2009 20:22 Page 1 The plan is to look at reserved in front of the small (01427 848400) (home) Rhossili Bay on the Friday office at SU 768717) contents and The Worm's Head on signposted from the end of NHM – Saturday 6 October the Saturday. the A329M (first exit 14:30h in the Demonstration 2 northbound after the M4 Room. Society information This site is at the western exits). This car park is We welcome as Guest Society website end of the Gower Heritage behind, but separate from, Speakers Fred Naggs and 3 Coast. The Gower is an area the multiscreen cinema car Dinarzarde Raheem from Ammonites of outstanding natural park. For those coming by NHM London on the subject Phil’ Palmer beauty: stupendous cliffs and train the easiest station is of ‘Sri Lanka: a threatened 4 Mollusc long beaches. The meeting Earley. Walk to the end of centre of land snail Pulmonates on should see the Barrel Shell Station Road then turn left endemism and diversity’. Port St Mary ledges Acteon tornatilis laying eggs down Wokingham Road Steve Wilkinson in the sand between the tide- (A329) until the river is YCS - Saturday 6 October 6 marks on Rhossili Beach. reached (about 20 mins). Squares NZ 20/21/30 Papillifera papillaris There is a long list of sand- Alternatively, the Park and south of Darlington. in Gibraltor living species from this Ride bus leaves from stop Contact: David Lindley Alex Menez beach. The Worm's Head SY in front of Thames Tower (0113 2697047) (home), 7 should be good for rock just across the Pelican [email protected] World No Shelling ISSUE No.13 dwelling species and crossing from Reading m S.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Tidal Freshwater Wetlands in North America
    Chapter 21 CONSERVATION OF TIDAL FRESHWATER WETLANDS IN NORTH AMERICA Dennis F. Whigham, Andrew H. Baldwin & Christopher W. Swarth This chapter was originally published in the book „Tidal Freshwater Wetlands“. The copy attached is provided by Margraf Publishers GmbH for the author‘s benefi t and for the benefi t of the author‘s institution, for non-commercial research, and educational use. All other uses, reproduction and distribution are prohibited. Tidal Freshwater Wetlands, edited by Aat Barendregt, Dennis Whigham & Andrew Baldwin 2009, viii + 320pp.; (incl. 16 colour plates), 21 x 29,7 cm, hardbound ISBN 978-3-8236-1551-4 © Copyright 2009, Margraf Publishers GmbH Backhuys Publishers, Leiden Margraf Publishers, Weikersheim, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND HISTORICAL PART 4: CASE STUDIES USE 13. Northeastern North American case studies – New Jersey and New England 1. Tidal freshwater wetlands – an introduction to the Mary Allessio Leck & Caitlin M. Crain ecosystem Andrew H. Baldwin, Aat Barendregt & Dennis F. 14. Tidal freshwater wetlands of the mid-Atlantic and Whigham southeastern United States James E. Perry, Donna M. Bilkovic, Kirk J. Havens 2. Human activities in European tidal freshwater wet- & Carl H. Hershner lands Ies S. Zonneveld & Aat Barendregt 15. Tidal freshwater wetlands of the Mississippi River deltas 3. Human uses of tidal freshwater wetlands on the USA Charles E. Sasser, James G. Gosselink, Guerry O. east coast Holm Jr. & Jenneke M. Visser Erik Kiviat 16. Tidal freshwater wetlands of Alaska Jonathan V. Hall PART 2: ECOSYSTEM DESCRIPTION 17. Ecological consequences of a change in tidal ampli- tude in tidal freshwater wetlands 4.
    [Show full text]
  • A Risk Analysis of the Chinese Mitten Crab in the Netherlands
    A risk analysis of the Chinese mitten crab in The Netherlands S. Bouma D. M. Soes Consultants for environment & ecology A risk analysis of the Chinese mitten crab in The Netherlands S. Bouma D.M. Soes Commissioned by: Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, Team Invasive Alien Species 10th of February 2010 Report nr. 10-025 Status: Final report Report nr.: 10-025 Date of publication: 10th of February 2010 Title: A risk analysis of the Chinese mitten crab in The Netherlands Author: Drs. S. Bouma Ir. D.M. Soes Number of pages incl. appendices: 51 Project nr: 09-772 Project manager: Ir. D.M. Soes Name & address client: Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, Team Invasive Alien Species, P.O. Box 9102, 6700 HC, Wageningen Reference client: Letter from the 4th of January 2010 : TRCPD/2010/001 Signed for publication: Teamleader Aquatic Ecology Jos Spier Initials: Bureau Waardenburg bv is not liable for any resulting damage, nor for damage which results from applying results of work or other data obtained from Bureau Waardenburg bv; client indemnifies Bureau Waardenburg bv against third-party liability in relation to these applications. © Bureau Waardenburg bv, Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, Team Invasive Alien Species This report is produced at the request of the client mentioned above and is his property. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted and/or publicized in any form or by any means, electronic, electrical, chemical, mechanical, optical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the client mentioned above and Bureau Waardenburg bv, nor may it without such a permission be used for any other purpose than for which it has been produced.
    [Show full text]
  • Malacologica
    FOLIA Folia Malacol. 23(4): 279–291 MALACOLOGICA ISSN 1506-7629 The Association of Polish Malacologists Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe Poznań, December 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.12657/folmal.023.024 SPECIES OF THE GENUS MERCURIA BOETERS, 1971 (CAENOGASTROPODA: TRUNCATELLOIDEA: HYDROBIIDAE) FROM THE EUROPEAN MEDITERRANEAN REGION, MOROCCO AND MADEIRA, WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF NEW SPECIES PETER GLÖER1, HANS D. BOETERS2, FRANK WALTHER3 1Biodiversity Research Laboratory, Schulstr. 3, D-25491 Hetlingen, Germany (email: [email protected]) 2Karneidstr. 8, D-81545 München, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]) 3Zoological Museum, Centre of Natural History, University of Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King Platz 3, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT: Anatomy and morphology of Mercuria species of the Mediterranean region and Madeira were examined. Four new species of Mercuria, M. rolani n. sp., M. tingitana n. sp., M. bakeri n. sp. and M. targuasensis n. sp., are described based on conchological and anatomical evidence. An identification key and a distribution map of Mercuria of the Mediterranean region and Madeira are also provided. KEY WORDS: Mercuria, distribution, Mediterranean region, Madeira, new descriptions INTRODUCTION Representatives of the genus Mercuria Boeters, 1887), M. bourguignati Glöer, Bouzid et Boeters, 1971 are widely distributed in the Atlantic coastal 2010 and M. gauthieri Glöer, Bouzid et Boeters, 2010 regions from Ireland, Great Britain (KERNEY 1999), from Algeria. The Netherlands (GITTENBERGER et al. 1998) and BOETERS (in BECKMANN 1987: 8) reported M. France (BOETERS 1971) to Portugal and Morocco confusa and BOETERS & BECKMANN (1991) M. ko- (BACKHUYS & BOETERS 1974, BOETERS 1988), as well belti (Westerlund, 1892) from Malta, both treated as in the Mediterranean region from France (BOETERS by GIUSTI et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitivity of Native and Non-Native Mollusc Species to Changing River Water Temperature and Salinity
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector Biol Invasions (2012) 14:1187–1199 DOI 10.1007/s10530-011-0148-y ORIGINAL PAPER Sensitivity of native and non-native mollusc species to changing river water temperature and salinity Laura N. H. Verbrugge • Aafke M. Schipper • Mark A. J. Huijbregts • Gerard Van der Velde • Rob S. E. W. Leuven Received: 22 July 2010 / Accepted: 22 November 2011 / Published online: 3 December 2011 Ó The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Climate change may strongly affect the water temperature and salinity levels recorded in (1) abiotic conditions in riverine ecosystems, for example different river sections for the extreme warm and dry by changing water temperature regimes and salinisation year 2003, and (2) the river Rhine at Lobith (The due to sea water intrusion and evaporation. We analysed Netherlands) over the period 1960–2009. Changing the effects of changes in water temperature and salinity temperature and salinity conditions in the river Rhine on the species pool of freshwater molluscs in the river over the past 50 years corresponded with a net increase Rhine. Species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) for in PNOF for native species. This was mainly due to maximum temperature and salinity tolerance were rising river water temperatures, which had a larger constructed for native and non-native species that are influence than decreasing salinity levels. For non-native currently present in the river Rhine. The maximum species no change in PNOF was found, indicating that temperature tolerance was significantly higher for non- future temperature rise will disproportionally affect native mollusc species than native ones.
    [Show full text]
  • RTB#36 Tim Worsfold
    The National Marine Biological Analytical Quality Control Scheme www.nmbaqcs.org Ring Test Bulletin – RTB#36 Tim Worsfold David Hall Unicomarine Ltd. May 2009 E-mail: [email protected] RING TEST DETAILS Ring Test #36 Type/Contents – Targeted; ‘Gastropods’ Circulated – 02/02/2009 Completion Date – 27/03/2009 Number of Subscribing Laboratories – 27 Number of Participating Laboratories – 25 Number of Results Received – 30* *multiple data entries per laboratory permitted Summary of differences Total differences for 30 returns Specimen Genus Species Genus Species RT3601 Skeneopsis planorbis 1 1 RT3602 Chrysallida sarsi 1 28 RT3603 Acanthodoris pilosa 0 0 RT3604 Crepidula fornicata 10 10 RT3605 Potamopyrgus antipodarum 22 22 RT3606 Hyala vitrea 23 23 RT3607 Ventrosia ventrosa 20 20 RT3608 Hyala vitrea 4 4 RT3609 Onoba aculeus 26 26 RT3610 Cylichnina umbilicata 14 14 RT3611 Chrysallida fenestrata 3 4 RT3612 Onoba aculeus 2 4 RT3613 Hydrobia ulvae 6 6 RT3614 Vitreolina philippi 4 7 RT3615 Gibbula cineraria 1 16 RT3616 Bittium reticulatum 1 1 RT3617 Lacuna vincta 7 13 RT3618 Omalogyra atomus 1 1 RT3619 Hydrobia ulvae 12 12 RT3620 Rissoa parva var. interrupta 7 8 RT3621 Radix balthica 4 4 RT3622 Crisilla semistriata 11 11 RT3623 Potamopyrgus antipodarum 1 1 RT3624 Potamopyrgus antipodarum 7 7 RT3625 Mercuria confusa 5 5 Total differences 193 248 Average differences /lab. 6.4 8.3 Table 1. The identification of fauna made by participating laboratories for RT36 (arranged by specimen). Names are given only where different from the AQC identification. RT3601 RT3602 RT3603 RT3604 RT3605 RT3606 Taxon Skeneopsis planorbis Chrysallida sarsi Acanthodoris pilosa Crepidula fornicata Potamopyrgus antipodarum Hyala vitrea LB1501 - - - decussata - - - - - - Odostomia eulimoides LB1503 - - - obtusa - - - - Brachystomia Spp.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Morphological Characters of Hydrobioid Snails
    A Review of Morphological Characters of Hydrobioid Snails ROBERT H ERSHLER and WINSTON F. PONDER Ifc SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 600 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Folklife Studies Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world of science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • Adastra 2006
    ADASTRA 2006 © Debby Mason An annual review of wildlife recording in Sussex published by The Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre ADASTRA 2006 A review of wildlife recording in Sussex in 2006 Published by the Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre 01273 497553/521 info @sxbrc.org.uk ADASTRA 2006 Printed and published March 2007 by the SUSSEX BIODIVERSITY RECORD CENTRE Woods Mill, Henfield West Sussex BN5 9SD Tel: 01273 497553/521 Fax: 0203 070 709 info @sxbrc.org.uk Editor: Patrick Roper Tel: 01424 870993 patrick @prassociates.co.uk Cover: Short Snouted Seahorse Hippocampus hippocampus by Debby Mason www.debbymason.com 1 ADASTRA 2006 A review of wildlife recording in Sussex in 2006 Published by the Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre 01273 497553/521 info @sxbrc.org.uk EDITORIAL: SUSSEX SPECIES AND CLIMATE CHANGE Patrick Roper: editor I write at the end of an unprecedentaly mild winter, though it is only the middle of January 2007, and along with many other enthusiasts for our Sussex countryside and its wildlife, I often wonder about the short and long term consequences of this trend. Several of the articles in this edition of the Adastra Review mention new species that seem to be happier in a milder climate. John Paul, for example, talks about the remarkable discovery of a colony of the sickle-bearing bush cricket in Hastings Country Park. Peter Hodge has now found the new-to-Britain picture-winged fly, Tephritis divisa , on its host plant bristly ox- tongue (itself an ancient introduction) at sites near the coast in East and West Sussex in both 2005 and 2006, while Colin Pratt has come up with a remarkable list of new migrant moths.
    [Show full text]