DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Army Intelligence Activities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. Army Intelligence Activities Army Regulation 381–10 Military Intelligence U.S. Army Intelligence Activities Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 3 May 2007 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 381–10 U.S. Army Intelligence Activities This rapid action revision, dated 3 May 2007-- o Cancels the protective marking FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY. o Changes major Army command to Army Command, Army Service Component Command, and Direct Reporting Unit throughout the publication. o Delineates Army Intelligence Components (para 1-1). o Changes major Army command to Commanders, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command and 650th MI Group (para 1-9b). o Rescinds Computer Trespassers (para 5-16). o Addresses the consensual intercept of computer trespasser communications and the approval requirements (paras 5-17 and 5-18). o Adds a provision addressing nonconsensual physical searches of non-U.S. persons outside the United States and the approval authorities (paras 7-4 and 7-5b). o Clarifies responsibility of commanders to provide access to personnel conducting oversight functions (para 14-3c). o Clarifies reporting requirements for questionable intelligence activity under Procedure 15 (paras 15-2b, 15-2c(1), 15-2c(4), 15-2d, 15-2e, 15-3a(1), and 15-6c). o Clarifies requirements for recurring intelligence oversight reporting (paras 15-6d, 15-6d(1), and 15-6d(2)). This major revision, dated 22 November 2005-- o Adds Army Reserve and Army National Guard responsibilities (paras 1-4k through n). o Delineates Army intelligence components (para 1-2). o Adds internet considerations and computer trespassers (paras 1-8, 5-4a, 5-4c, and 5-21). o Requires the intelligence oversight staff officer to be an intelligence professional (paras 1-4h(7), 1-4i(6), 1-4j(7), 1-4k(6), 1-4m(6), 1-4n(2), and 1-4p(4). o Expands approval authorities (paras 4-3, 5-7b, 5-8c, 5-20b, 6-4, 7-1a(1), 7- 2a(1), 8-3c, 8-3d, 8-4c, 9-4b, 9-5a, 9-5b, and 10-4a). o Clarifies reporting for questionable intelligence activities (paras15-1, 15- 2a, 15-2c through 15-2l, 15-4a and b, and 15-5). o Clarifies reporting for Federal crimes (paras 16-1, 16-2, and 16-3). o Adds guidance on force protection support limitations within the United States (paras 17-1 and 17-2). o Adds guidance on U.S. Army Intelligence participation in multinational intelligence activities (para 17-3). o Adds guidance on U.S. Army Intelligence participation in joint intelligence activities (para 17-4). o Adds guidance on U.S. Army Intelligence support to other Department of Defense investigative organizations (para 17-5). o Changes references to DOD intelligence components and Department of Defense agencies to Army intelligence components and Army agencies throughout, to reflect accurately the applicability of this regulation. Headquarters *Army Regulation 381–10 Department of the Army Washington, DC 3 May 2007 Effective 3 June 2007 Military Intelligence U.S. Army Intelligence Activities m a y m o d i f y c h a p t e r s a n d p o l i c i e s c o n - Pentagon, Suite 2D350, Washington, DC tained in this regulation. 20310–1000. Proponent and exception authority. C o m m i t t e e C o n t i n u a n c e A p p r o v a l . The proponent for this regulation is the The establishment and/or continuance of Deputy Chief of Staff, G–2. The Deputy Army committees are made in accordance Chief of Staff, G–2 has the authority to with Army Regulation 15–1. The regula- approve exceptions or waivers to this reg- ulation that are consistent with controlling tion requires that the proponent justify es- law and regulations. The Deputy Chief of t a b l i s h i n g a n d / o r c o n t i n u i n g t h e Staff, G–2 may delegate this approval au- c o m m i t t e e ( s ) , c o o r d i n a t e d r a f t p u b l i c a - t h o r i t y , i n w r i t i n g , t o a d i v i s i o n c h i e f tions, and coordinate changes in commit- within the proponent agency or its direct t e e s t a t u s w i t h t h e D A C o m m i t t e e reporting unit or field operating agency, in M a n a g e m e n t O f f i c e , A T T N : S A A A - R P , the grade of colonel or the civilian equiv- O f f i c e o f t h e A d m i n i s t r a t i v e A s s i s t a n t , alent. Activities may request a waiver to R e s o u r c e s a n d P r o g r a m s A g e n c y , 2 5 1 1 this regulation by providing justification Jefferson Davis Highway, Taylor Build- History. This publication is a rapid action that includes a full analysis of the benefits i n g , 1 3 t h F l o o r , A r l i n g t o n , V A 2 2 2 0 2 - r e v i s i o n . T h e p o r t i o n s a f f e c t e d b y t h i s and must include a formal review by the 3926; and, if it is determined that an es- r a p i d a c t i o n r e v i s i o n a r e l i s t e d i n t h e activity’s senior legal officer. All waiver t a b l i s h e d “ g r o u p ” i d e n t i f i e d w i t h i n t h i s summary of change. r e q u e s t s w i l l b e e n d o r s e d b y t h e c o m - regulation later takes on the characteristics S u m m a r y . T h i s r e g u l a t i o n i m p l e m e n t s mander or senior leader of the requesting of a committee, the proponent will follow Executive Order 12333, as amended by a c t i v i t y a n d f o r w a r d e d t h r o u g h t h e i r all Army Regulation 15–1 requirements higher headquarters to the policy propo- Executive Orders 13284 and 13355; pol- for establishing and continuing the group icy between the Department of Justice and n e n t . R e f e r t o A R 2 5 – 3 0 f o r s p e c i f i c guidance. as a committee. The Department of the i n t e l l i g e n c e c o m m u n i t y m e m b e r s o n A r m y C o m m i t t e e M a n a g e m e n t O f f i c e r crimes reporting; and Department of De- Army management control process. has reviewed this regulation and concurs f e n s e D i r e c t i v e 5 2 4 0 . 1 , D e p a r t m e n t o f This regulation contains key management in the establishment and/or continuance of Defense Publication 5240.1–R, and De- control provisions and identifies key man- committee(s) outlined herein. partment of Defense Instruction 5240.4. It agement controls that must be evaluated. establishes responsibility for intelligence S u p p l e m e n t a t i o n . S u p p l e m e n t a t i o n o f Distribution. This publication is availa- a c t i v i t i e s c o n c e r n i n g U . S . p e r s o n s , i n - ble in electronic media only and is in- cludes guidance on the conduct of intru- this regulation and establishment of com- mand and local forms are prohibited with- tended for command levels A, B, C, D, s i v e i n t e l l i g e n c e c o l l e c t i o n t e c h n i q u e s , and E for the Active Army, the Army and provides reporting procedures for cer- out prior approval from the Deputy Chief National Guard/Army National Guard of tain Federal crimes. of Staff, G–2 (DAMI–CDC), 1000 Army Pentagon, Suite 2D350, Washington, DC the United States, and the United States. Applicability. This regulation applies to 20310–1000.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NSA's Efforts to Secure Private-Sector Telecommunications Infrastructure
    Under the Radar: NSA’s Efforts to Secure Private-Sector Telecommunications Infrastructure Susan Landau* INTRODUCTION When Google discovered that intruders were accessing certain Gmail ac- counts and stealing intellectual property,1 the company turned to the National Security Agency (NSA) for help in securing its systems. For a company that had faced accusations of violating user privacy, to ask for help from the agency that had been wiretapping Americans without warrants appeared decidedly odd, and Google came under a great deal of criticism. Google had approached a number of federal agencies for help on its problem; press reports focused on the company’s approach to the NSA. Google’s was the sensible approach. Not only was NSA the sole government agency with the necessary expertise to aid the company after its systems had been exploited, it was also the right agency to be doing so. That seems especially ironic in light of the recent revelations by Edward Snowden over the extent of NSA surveillance, including, apparently, Google inter-data-center communications.2 The NSA has always had two functions: the well-known one of signals intelligence, known in the trade as SIGINT, and the lesser known one of communications security or COMSEC. The former became the subject of novels, histories of the agency, and legend. The latter has garnered much less attention. One example of the myriad one could pick is David Kahn’s seminal book on cryptography, The Codebreakers: The Comprehensive History of Secret Communication from Ancient Times to the Internet.3 It devotes fifty pages to NSA and SIGINT and only ten pages to NSA and COMSEC.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Communications Security Establishment: from Cold War to Globalization
    CANADA’S COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY ESTABLISHMENT: FROM COLD WAR TO GLOBALISATION Martin Rudner OCCASIONAL PAPER No 22 – 2000 CANADA’S COMMUNICATION SECURITY ESTABLISHMENT: FROM COLD WAR TO GLOBALISATION Martin Rudner OCCASIONAL PAPER No 22 – 2000 The Norman Paterson School of International Affairs Carleton University 1125 Colonel By Drive Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6 Telephone: 613-520-6655 Fax: 613-520-2889 www.carleton.ca/npsia This series is published by the Centre for Security and Defence Studies at the School and supported by a grant from the Security Defence Forum of the Department of National Defence. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily represent the views of the School or the Department of National Defence. TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ii Abbreviations iv INTRODUCTION 1 THE BEGINNINGS OF CANADIAN SIGINT 2 CANADA’S SIGINT COLLECTION EFFORT 6 COLD WAR SIGINT OPERATIONS 8 CANADA AND THE UKUSA AGREEMENT 11 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS AND ECHELON 13 SIGINT TECHNOLOGY ACCESS AND SHARING 16 CANADA’S POST-COLD WAR SIGINT AGENDA 18 THE ECONOMIC INTELLIGENCE CONUNDRUM 22 FUTURE CHALLENGES 25 Notes 34 About the Author 41 LIST OF OCCASIONAL PAPERS 42 i ABSTRACT The Communications Security Establishment (CSE) is Canada’s largest, best funded and most highly secretive intelligence agency, and is the main provider of foreign intelligence to the Canadian government. CSE collects, analyses and reports on signals intelligence (SIGINT) derived from interceptions of foreign electronic communications, radio, radar, telemetry, and other electromagnetic emissions. In fulfilment of its foreign intelligence function, CSE collaborates closely in a special SIGINT sharing arrangement with the United States, United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand known as UKUSA.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Operations Center How-To Quick Reference Guide August 2021
    National Incident Management System Emergency Operations Center How-To Quick Reference Guide August 2021 This page intentionally left blank Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 9 1. Purpose ...................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1. NIMS Compliance and Integration ................................................................................. 9 What Is an EOC? ........................................................................................................................ 10 1. Hallmarks of an EOC ............................................................................................................... 10 Preliminary Assessments .......................................................................................................... 12 1. Hazard and Vulnerability Assessment .................................................................................... 12 2. Resilience Analysis and Planning Tool ................................................................................... 12 3. Capability Assessment ............................................................................................................ 13 3.1. Interagency Coordination ............................................................................................. 13 3.2. Multiagency Coordination Groups ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • KY-58 (Vinson)
    KY-58 (Vinson) The KY-57/58 is a member of the VINSON family. The VINSON family consists of wideband secure voice (WBSV) units developed by the National Security Agency to provide line of sight half-duplex voice and data encryption at 16 Kbps. The KY-57/58 provides security for AM/FM, VHF, UHF, half-duplex PTT combat net radios and tactical wireline systems when used with the HYX-57. Also used by non-tactical users for high-level communications in the local wideband telephone networks and wideband satellite terminals. The KY-57 is the manpack/vehicular model and the KY-58 is the airborne/shipborne version. The KY-57/58 is certified to pass data up to TOP SECRET and accepts key from the family of Common Fill Devices and also incorporates remote keying. KY-57/58 production was completed in 1993. No further production is planned. KY-58 photo by Tim Tyler Tim Tyler comments."The photo above depicts the KY-58 unit inside a USCG HH-65C 'Dolphin' helicopter taken in September 2008. It is currently configured just for use on their 225-400MHz aircraft band radio. Supposedly, they're in the process of upgrading the HH-65 helos into an MH-65 (Special Ops capable) configuration which will have APCO P-25 compliant radios (with AES crypto, for talking to other DHS agencies) as well as ANDVT / KY-100 type crypto for communicating with the military-side of USCG ops". The photo above depicts a KY-58 RCU installation in an A-10 attack aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of U.S. Communications Security (U)
    A HISTORY OF U.S. COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (U) THE DAVID G. BOAK LECTURES VOLUME II NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755 The information contained in this publication will not be disclosed to foreign nationals or their representatives without express approval of the DIRECTOR, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY. Approval shall refer specifically to this publication or to specific information contained herein. JULY 1981 CLASSIFIED BY NSA/CSSM 123-2 REVIEW ON 1 JULY 2001 NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREI6N NATIONALS SECRET HA~mLE YIA COMINT CIIA~HJELS O~JLY ORIGINAL (Reverse Blank) ---------- • UNCLASSIFIED • TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBJECT PAGE NO INTRODUCTION _______ - ____ - __ -- ___ -- __ -- ___ -- __ -- ___ -- __ -- __ --- __ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ iii • POSTSCRIPT ON SURPRISE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I OPSEC--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS ___ -------- --- ___ ---- _______________ ---- _ --- _ ----- _ 7 THREAT IN ASCENDANCY _________________________________ - ___ - - _ -- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 9 • LPI _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I I SARK-SOME CAUTIONARY HISTORY __ --- _____________ ---- ________ --- ____ ----- _ _ 13 THE CRYPTO-IGNITION KEY __________ --- __ -- _________ - ---- ___ -- ___ - ____ - __ -- _ _ _ 15 • PCSM _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
    [Show full text]
  • AR 380-40 Safeguarding and Controlling Communications
    FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Army Regulation 380–40 Security Safeguarding and Controlling Communications Security Material Distribution Restriction Statement. This publication contains technical or operational information that is for official Government use only. Distribution is limited to Government agencies or their contractors. Requests from outside the Government for release of this publication under the Freedom of Information Act will be referred to the Commanding General, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, (IACSF–FI), Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755–5995. Requests from outside of the Government for release of this publication under the Foreign Military Sales program must be made to the Deputy Chief of Staff, G–2 (DAMI–CDS), 1000 Army Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310–1000. Destruction Notice. Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document. Rapid Action Revision (RAR) Issue Date: 24 April 2013 Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 9 July 2012 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 380–40 Safeguarding and Controlling Communications Security Material This rapid action revision, dated 24 April 2013- o Updates responsibilities for Commanding General, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command; Commanders, Army commands, Army service component commands, and direct reporting units; command security officers; commanders at all levels; and individual users (paras 1-8, 1-11, 1-12, 1-13, and 1-16). o Provides expanded policy and guidance for administering the Counterintelligence Scope Polygraph Program in support of the Department of the Army Cryptographic Access Program (chap 7). o Requires use of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • International Spy Museum
    International Spy Museum Searchable Master Script, includes all sections and areas Area Location, ID, Description Labels, captions, and other explanatory text Area 1 – Museum Lobby M1.0.0.0 ΚΑΤΆΣΚΟΠΟΣ SPY SPION SPIJUN İSPİYON SZPIEG SPIA SPION ESPION ESPÍA ШПИОН Language of Espionage, printed on SCHPION MAJASUSI windows around entrance doors P1.1.0.0 Visitor Mission Statement For Your Eyes Only For Your Eyes Only Entry beyond this point is on a need-to-know basis. Who needs to know? All who would understand the world. All who would glimpse the unseen hands that touch our lives. You will learn the secrets of tradecraft – the tools and techniques that influence battles and sway governments. You will uncover extraordinary stories hidden behind the headlines. You will meet men and women living by their wits, lurking in the shadows of world affairs. More important, however, are the people you will not meet. The most successful spies are the unknown spies who remain undetected. Our task is to judge their craft, not their politics – their skill, not their loyalty. Our mission is to understand these daring professionals and their fallen comrades, to recognize their ingenuity and imagination. Our goal is to see past their maze of mirrors and deception to understand their world of intrigue. Intelligence facts written on glass How old is spying? First record of spying: 1800 BC, clay tablet from Hammurabi regarding his spies. panel on left side of lobby First manual on spy tactics written: Over 2,000 years ago, Sun Tzu’s The Art of War. 6 video screens behind glass panel with facts and images.
    [Show full text]
  • Going Dark: Impact to Intelligence and Law Enforcement and Threat Mitigation
    GOING DARK: IMPACT TO INTELLIGENCE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THREAT MITIGATION Bonnie Mitchell Krystle Kaul G. S. McNamara Michelle Tucker Jacqueline Hicks Colin Bliss Rhonda Ober Danell Castro Amber Wells Catalina Reguerin Cindy Green-Ortiz Ken Stavinoha ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to first thank the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) for its generous funding and support for our study and learning journey to the DEFCON hacking conference. We are also very grateful to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for its support during the duration of the program. We could not have completed this study without the unwavering support and dedication of Ms. Bonnie Mitchell, ODNI Deputy National Intelligence Manager for the Western Hemisphere and the Homeland, our devoted Team Champion who steered us throughout this study and helped turn an idea into a product. We would like to acknowledge and thank each member of our public-private sector working group for their tireless efforts from around the U.S., which includes Krystle Kaul, G. S. McNamara, Michelle Tucker, Jacqueline Hicks, Colin Bliss, Rhonda Ober, Danell Castro, Amber Wells, Catalina Reguerin, Cindy Green- Ortiz and Ken Stavinoha. We are very thankful for all the unique insight we received from interviewees who contributed to this report by educating our group on the many aspects of ‘going dark,’ and we take full responsibility for any and all errors of fact or interpretation implied or explicit in this paper. Our interviewees include the Village sponsors at DEF CON, private sector industry experts and government officials. We are thankful for the interesting and diverse perspectives particularly from senior government officials and private sector experts.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveillant Individualism in an Era of Relentless Visibility
    International Journal of Communication 10(2016), 164–177 1932–8036/20160005 Managing Surveillance: Surveillant Individualism in an Era of Relentless Visibility SHIV GANESH1 Massey University, New Zealand Contemporary surveillance occurs in the context of communicative abundance, where visibility is not only easy but relentless: never ending, far reaching, and ceaseless. Managing surveillance therefore has considerable implications for democratic politics, workplace control, economic practices, cultural politics, and individual subjectivity. This article identifies surveillant individualism, or the pivotal role that individuals play in surveillance and countersurveillance, as a major feature of contemporary surveillance management. It seeks to clarify current research trajectories on digital surveillance management and to chart a course for organizational research on surveillant individualism. Keywords: countersurveillance, relentless visibility, sousveillance, surveillant individualism The rise of surveillance needs foremost to be contextualized with visibility as a major 21st century trope. It is not a stretch to claim that visibility is now a central concern of social and organizational theory, and scholars from multiple theoretical traditions and disciplines have traced how myriad forms of sociality and organizing have been modernized and rationalized, rendered knowable, and made transparent and accessible (Brighenti, 2007, 2010). Others have argued that the 21st century is characterized by a “new visibility,” a powerful new force facilitated
    [Show full text]
  • 7133 Trouble V4.Pdf
    HOW TO LOOK FOR TROUBLE A STRATFOR Guide to Protective Intelligence S t r at for Global Intelligence STRATFOR 700 Lavaca Street, Suite 900 Austin, Texas 78701 Copyright © 2010 by STRATFOR All rights reserved, including the right of reproduction in whole or in part Printed in the United States of America The contents of this book originally appeared as analyses on STRATFOR’s subscription Web site. ISBN: [?] EAN-13: [?] Publisher: Grant Perry Editor: Michael McCullar Project Coordinator: Robert Inks Designer: TJ Lensing COntenTs Introduction v ANoteonContent ix CHapter 1: PrinCiples and CHallengEs TheProblemoftheLoneWolf 1 TheSecretsofCountersurveillance 8 Threats,SituationalAwarenessandPerspective 14 IntelligenceasaProactiveTool 19 CounterterrorismFunding:OldFearsandCyclical Lulls 25 AQAP:ParadigmShiftsandLessonsLearned 31 Counterterrorism:Shiftingfromthe‘Who’tothe ‘How’ 39 Profiling:SketchingtheFaceofJihadism 46 CHapter 2: The Art of SurvEillance Surveillance:ForGood—andEvil 53 TheSpreadofTechnicalSurveillance 55 PhysicalSurveillance:TailingSomeoneontheMove 57 PhysicalSurveillance:TheArtofBlendingIn 60 TurningtheTablesonSurveillants 62 iii Table of Contents CHapter 3: Protecting People Bhutto’sDeath:FatalFactors 67 India:AKidnappingCaseStudy 70 China:SecurityAspectsoftheDalaiLama’sTravels 73 TheU.S.ElectionSeason:SecurityChallengesand ConventionalWisdom 75 Mexico:ExaminingtheCartelWarThrougha ProtectiveLens 80 Mexico:TacticalImplicationsoftheLabastida Killing 87 Mexico:TheThirdWar 89 CHapter 4: SafegUaRding Places CorporateSecurity:TheTechnologyCrutch
    [Show full text]
  • National Incident Management System: Intelligence/Investigations
    NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Intelligence/Investigations Function Guidance and Field Operations Guide October 2013 NIMS: Intelligence/Investigations Function Guidance and Field Operations Guide Table of Contents Intelligence/Investigations Function Guidance ................................................................ 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................... 3 Intelligence/Investigations Function ............................................................................................ 7 Use and Organization of Groups .................................................................................................. 8 Use and Organization of Branches ............................................................................................... 9 Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Intelligence/Investigations Function Field Operations Guide ....................................... 11 Intelligence/Investigations Functional Overview ...................................................................... 12 Groups and Structure within the Intelligence/Investigations Section .................................... 19 List of Abbreviations and Glossary of Key Terms ......................................................... 31 List of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Security Agency (NSA) Document: a History of U.S
    Description of document: National Security Agency (NSA) document: A History of U.S. Communications Security Post World-War II – released under Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Released date: February 2011 Posted date: 07-November-2011 Source of document: National Security Agency Declassification Services (DJ5) Suite 6884, Bldg. SAB2 9800 Savage Road Ft. George G. Meade, MD, 20755-6884 Note: Although the titles are similar, this document should not be confused with the David G. Boak Lectures available: http://www.governmentattic.org/2docs/Hist_US_COMSEC_Boak_NSA_1973.pdf The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. -----------------------------------------------------------------------~~) '; I .:· ! _k:::._,.l COMitfll A HISTORY OF U.S.
    [Show full text]