DOCSLIB.ORG

Part 1—Vision­

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Part 1—Vision Giant Sequoia National Monument Management Plan 5 Part 1—Vision Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument 6 Part 1—Vision Purpose of the Monument Plan The purpose of the Giant Sequoia National Monument decision making, while guiding resource management Management Plan (Monument Plan) is to provide programs, practices, uses, and projects. It will overall strategic guidance for managing the Giant guide the development and analysis of resource Sequoia National Monument (Monument). The unique management activities in future site-specific projects and special features of the Monument—the giant to move resources toward the desired conditions for sequoia groves, the ecosystems that support them, the Monument. and the other objects of interest—are what make the Monument what it is: a special area that merits careful This plan does not include any decisions on specific management, protection, and preservation. This plan projects or activities. Those decisions will be made provides for the protection of the objects of interest later, after more detailed analysis of specific project while encouraging continued public and recreation sites and additional public involvement on site- access and use consistent with the purposes of the specific proposals. Compliance with the National Monument (Clinton 2000, p. 24097). It contributes Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is required for to social, economic, and ecological sustainability by any project-level decision that may have an effect guiding the restoration or maintenance of the health of on the environment. Project-level decisions must be the land in the Monument. informed by site-specific analysis through an open, public process. This Monument Plan was developed for the selected alternative, Alternative B, as identified in the Giant The Monument Plan is adaptive in that new Sequoia National Monument Final Environmental knowledge and information can be analyzed and Impact Statement (FEIS). The FEIS describes the the plan changed, if appropriate, at any time. It analysis used in formulating the Monument Plan. A provides overall intent and guidance, but provides the Record of Decision is also available that identifies the flexibility needed for the responsible official to work selected alternative and the rationale used in making with the public and adapt management strategies to the decision. the constantly changing demands that are inherent to natural resource management. It defines the The Monument Plan provides the strategic parameters (limits) for management but allows for direction at the broad program level for managing the adjustment of future project-level decisions to the Monument and its resources over the next 10 accommodate rapidly changing social and resource to 15 years. It includes the direction required by conditions. This allows the latest science and public the Clinton proclamation (Proclamation), and it input to be employed at the time a decision is to be replaces, in its entirety, all previous management made. direction for the Monument, including the direction in the 1988 Sequoia National Forest Land and The Monument Plan was prepared according to the Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan) for this requirements of the National Forest Management Act part of the Sequoia National Forest. It is the single (NFMA), its implementing regulations at 36 Code of comprehensive management plan for this area. While Federal Regulations (CFR) 219 (77 FR 21260, April the Monument Plan is a stand-alone document, it is 9, 2012), the National Environmental Policy Act of also a subset of the entire Forest Plan. 1969 (NEPA), and the Council of Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations at 40 CFR 1500-1509. This strategic direction was developed by an NFMA’s current implementing regulations at 36 interdisciplinary planning team working with forest CFR 219.17(b)(3) (77 FR at 21270) allow the use staff, making use of extensive public involvement of the provisions of the prior planning regulation, and collaboration, and the best science available. including its transition provisions (2000 Planning The Monument Plan implements the Proclamation Rule at 36 CFR 219.35(a) and (b) [2010], December by providing guidance to protect the objects of 18, 2009). The transition provisions of the 2000 interest, restore ecosystems, and provide opportunities planning rule allow the use of the prior planning for public use. It provides a context for informed regulation promulgated in 1982. The Monument Giant Sequoia National Monument Management Plan 7 Part 1—Vision Plan was developed using the process outlined in Unless otherwise noted, all subsequent citations to the 1982 planning regulations, while considering the “36 CFR 219” in this document refer to the 1982 best available science as required by the 2000 rule planning process: see 36 CFR Part 219 (2000). transition provisions (36 CFR 219.35(a) (2010)). Organization of the Monument Plan This Monument Plan consists of four interrelated parts for the Monument. It then lays out the management that work together to facilitate the use of adaptive strategies and objectives (36 CFR 219.11 (b)(2)) that management and the development of management the Forest Service will strive to achieve in order to activities that will move the Monument toward the move the Monument toward the desired conditions desired conditions. Part 1—Vision paints the picture described in Part 1. Part 2 also identifies special areas of the conditions desired in the long term. Part 2— in the Monument (36 CFR 219.17(3)), as well as the Strategy contains the strategic management direction. land allocations and management areas (36 CFR Part 3—Design Criteria contains the guidance for 219.11(c)(4)) for the Monument. designing actions and activities in order to make progress toward the vision and desired conditions Part 3 is the Design Criteria for the Monument. The described in Part 1. Part 4 contains the Transportation design criteria include the laws and regulations, Plan for the Monument. treatment and clear need criteria, the decision tree, standards and guidelines (36 CFR 219.11(c) and Part 1 is the Vision for the Monument. It includes the 219.13 through 219.29(5)), and monitoring and purpose of the Monument Plan, the relationship of the evaluation procedures that will be used during site- Monument Plan to other documents, and a description specific project planning and implementation. Design of the Monument. Part 1 discusses the Monument criteria are sideboards for subsequent projects and niche (the Monument’s uniqueness on a national and activities to help achieve the desired conditions. regional level) and its recreation niche. Part 1 also describes the desired conditions (36 CFR 219.11(b)(1)) Part 4 is the Transportation Plan for the Monument. for the resources of the Monument. Required by the Proclamation, it provides a framework by which to manage the transportation Part 2 is the Strategy for the Monument. It begins by system and make future decisions concerning changes identifying generally suitable land uses and activities to it. 1. These are 1982 regulations that are no longer in the CFR, but 3. Ibid. are still applicable to this plan amendment. 4. Ibid. 2. Ibid. 5. Ibid. Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument 8 Part 1—Vision Relationship of the Monument Plan to Other Documents Figure 1 Management Direction and Guidance for the Monument The Record of Decision (ROD) for the Monument Agreement (MSA) and is constrained by that which is Plan EIS amends the existing 1988 Forest Plan, as applicable to the Monument and consistent with the amended by the 1991 Kings River Wild and Scenic Proclamation. The Monument Plan also considers the River and Special Management Area Implementation 2004 Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment (2004 Plan (KRSMA), the 2001 Sierra Nevada Forest Plan SNFPA), but is not constrained by its management Amendment (2001 SNFPA), and the 2007 Sierra recommendations. The Monument Plan was guided Nevada Forest Management Indicator Species by the best available science, a thorough review Amendment (SNF MIS). The Monument Plan was of relevant scientific information, and practical developed using the guidance and management experience, as required by national forest planning direction provided by the 1990 Mediated Settlement direction and the Proclamation. Giant Sequoia National Monument Management Plan 9 Part 1—Vision Monument Description The Giant Sequoia National Monument (Monument) the Giant Sequoia National Monument holds a diverse is located in south-central California and covers array of scientific and historic resources. Magnificent 328,315 acres administered by the United States groves of towering giant sequoias, the world’s largest Department of Agriculture (USDA), Forest Service, trees, are interspersed within a great belt of coniferous Sequoia National Forest (see location maps in Appen- forest, jeweled with mountain meadows. Bold granitic dices A and B). Created by presidential proclamation domes, spires, and plunging gorges texture the land- on April 15, 2000, the “rich and varied landscape of scape” (Clinton 2000, p. 24095). Vision The Monument is set apart and reserved for the pond turtle; and other species listed as threatened, purpose of protecting the objects of interest identified endangered, or sensitive by the Endangered in the Proclamation, for their proper care and Species Act or the Forest Service. management (Clinton 2000). The objects of interest ● The paleontological resources in meadow were generally identified in the
Recommended publications
  • Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Parks, However, Went Unnoticed

    Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Parks, However, Went Unnoticed

    • D -1:>K 1.2!;EQUOJA-KING$ Ci\NYON NATIONAL PARKS History of the Parks "''' Evaluation of Historic Resources Detennination of Effect, DCP Prepared by • A. Berle Clemensen DENVER SERVICE CENTER HISTORIC PRESERVATION TEA.'! NATIONAL PAP.K SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPAR'J'}fENT OF THE l~TERIOR DENVER, COLOR..\DO SEPTEffilER 1975 i i• Pl.EA5!: RETUl1" TO: B&WScans TEallillCAL INFORMAl!tll CfNIEil 0 ·l'i «coo,;- OOIVER Sf:RV!Gf Cf!fT£R llAT!ONAL PARK S.:.'Ma j , • BRIEF HISTORY OF SEQUOIA Spanish and Mexican Period The first white men, the Spanish, entered the San Joaquin Valley in 1772. They, however, only observed the Sierra Nevada mountains. None entered the high terrain where the giant Sequoia exist. Only one explorer came close to the Sierra Nevadas. In 1806 Ensign Gabriel Moraga, venturing into the foothills, crossed and named the Rio de la Santos Reyes (River of the Holy Kings) or Kings River. Americans in the San Joaquin Valley The first band of Americans entered the Valley in 1827 when Jedediah Smith and a group of fur traders traversed it from south to north. This journey ushered in the first American frontier as fifteen years of fur trapping followed. Still, none of these men reported sighting the giant trees. It was not until 1833 that members of the Joseph R. 1lalker expedition crossed the Sierra Nevadas and received credit as the first whites to See the Sequoia trees. These trees are presumed to form part of either the present M"rced or Tuolwnregroves. Others did not learn of their find since Walker's group failed to report their discovery.
  • From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-Creation of the Tribal Identity On

    From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-Creation of the Tribal Identity On

    From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-creation of the Tribal Identity on the Tule River Indian Reservation in California from Euroamerican Contact to the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 By Kumiko Noguchi B.A. (University of the Sacred Heart) 2000 M.A. (Rikkyo University) 2003 Dissertation Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Native American Studies in the Office of Graduate Studies of the University of California Davis Approved Steven J. Crum Edward Valandra Jack D. Forbes Committee in Charge 2009 i UMI Number: 3385709 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 3385709 Copyright 2009 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Kumiko Noguchi September, 2009 Native American Studies From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-creation of the Tribal Identity on the Tule River Indian Reservation in California from Euroamerican contact to the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 Abstract The main purpose of this study is to show the path of tribal development on the Tule River Reservation from 1776 to 1936. It ends with the year of 1936 when the Tule River Reservation reorganized its tribal government pursuant to the Indian Reorganization Act (IRA) of 1934.
  • Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks Visitor Guide: Summer 2018

    Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks Visitor Guide: Summer 2018

    National Park Service Visitor Guide: Summer 2018 U.S. Department of the Interior Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks Sequoia National Forest/Giant Sequoia National Monument Sequoia Parks Conservancy Become a Volunteer Moro Rock, Dawn In This Issue I HAVE BEEN COMING TO maintain them, the forest more Your children crouch to follow Activities & programs ......5 Sequoia and Kings Canyon Na- depth when you monitor and pro- the progress of the blue-black beetle Bears & food storage ....11 tional Parks since 1976 when my tect its health. working its way on granite. parents drove our little family here Campgrounds .................4 You gain so much from these scien- Above, birds dive to catch moths, to show us what nature meant. I whose wings are left behind tists, historians, trail crews, natural- Construction delays .......12 have wandered the trails of these to come down like ash. ists, cave guides, and rangers when mountains ever since. Exploring ...................... 6-7 you give a little of your time. This morning view is yours alone. It is my second home, what I think It stretches as far as it can Facilities & hours . ........ 8-9 - JOHN BRANTINGHAM of as my true home, the place I toward the sea. Lodging ...........................5 dream of when my semester of For more information about volunteer- John Brantingham is the frst poet laure- teaching becomes difcult. I have ing in Sequoia and Kings Canyon, email ate for these parks. Each summer, he Map of park roads ...........8 discovered the nature my parents [email protected], call 559-565- and his wife Ann, lead creative work- wanted me to fnd.
  • Chapter 21: Literature: John Muir

    Chapter 21: Literature: John Muir

    Mount Shasta Annotated Bibliography Chapter 21 Literature: John Muir John Muir's exceptional mental and physical stamina enabled him to rigorously pursue, often in solitary fashion, the exploration of California's mountains. In the Fall of 1874 and the Spring of 1875 he climbed Mt. Shasta three times. Among the entries listed in this section are Muir's pocket notebooks kept during these climbs. His 1875 notebook contains many detailed drawings of the Shasta region. In one case, on April 28, 1875, he drew from the summit of Mt. Shasta a picture depicting an approaching storm, a storm similar to the one which would two days later, on another climb of the mountain, trap him and his climbing partner Jerome Fay on the summit of Mt. Shasta. Also listed in this section are the reports of A. F. Rodgers, who had hired Muir and Fay in the Spring of 1875 to go and take summit barometric readings. Rodgers wrote a fascinating report which vividly details the appearance and condition of Muir and Fay immediately following the overnight ordeal on April 30, 1875. Muir himself wrote stories of the ordeal that were published in several sources, including Harper's Magazine in 1877 and Picturesque California in 1888. Many of Muir's other published works describe Mt. Shasta. His earliest Mt. Shasta writings were a series of five articles printed in the San Francisco Daily Evening Bulletin in 1874 and 1875; these have been edited and published by Robert Engberg as part of John Muir: Summering in the Sierra (not the same book as Muir's own book My First Summer in the Sierra).
  • Stony Creek and Montecito Sequoia Resorts Biological Assessment And

    Stony Creek and Montecito Sequoia Resorts Biological Assessment And

    Stony Creek and Montecito Sequoia Resorts Biological Assessment and Biological Evaluation for Sequoia National Forest Hume Lake Ranger District Improvement and Expansion Projects within Giant Sequoia National Monument Tulare County, California December 5, 2019 Prepared for: United States Forest Service Sequoia National Forest Hume Lake District District Ranger: Jeremy Dorsey 35860 East Kings Canyon Road Dunlap, CA 93621 Prepared by: Michelle McKenzie and Prairie Moore Natural Resources Management Corporation 1434 Third Street Eureka, CA 95501 Table of Contents I. Summary of Findings and Conclusions ........................................................................................ 1 II. Introduction, Background, and Project Understanding .............................................................. 2 Project Locations ......................................................................................................................... 3 Project Descriptions .................................................................................................................. 10 Biological Descriptions .............................................................................................................. 16 III. Methods ................................................................................................................................... 17 Pre-Field Review ........................................................................................................................ 17 Field Survey ..............................................................................................................................
  • The Big Trees of California (1907), by Galen Clark

    The Big Trees of California (1907), by Galen Clark

    Next: Title Page The Big Trees of California (1907), by Galen Clark Contents Illustrations • Title • Cover [Wawona Tree drawing] • Contents • Galen Clark • Illustrations • General Grant Tree • Prologue • Grizzly Giant • The Big Trees of California • Dancing Pavilion, Calaveras Grove • Origin of the Big Trees • Illinois Tree, Tuolumne Grove • Distribution of the Big Trees • Guardian’s Cabin, Mariposa Grove • The Mariposa Grove • General Grant Tree • General Grant and Sequoia National Parks • In the Merced Grove • Size of the Big Trees • General Sherman Tree • Age of the Sequoias • Mother of the Forest • Habits and Characteristics • Empire State Tree, Calveras Grove • Cones and Seeds • Four Guardsmen • Young Sequoias • Cones and Foliage • Celebrated Specimens • Fallen Monarch • A Solitary Survivor • Young Sequoia • Other Celebrated Trees • Wawona Tree • Botanical Nomenclature • Grizzly Giant • Wawona Hotel and Cottages • Boole Tree, King’s River Grove • Dead Giant, Tuolumne Grove About the Author Galen Clark in front of Grizzly Giant circa 1865-66. C. E. Watkins photo. Galen Clark is famous for his discovery of the Mariposa Grove of Giant Sequoia trees and for his role as Guardian of Yosemite National Park for several years. Mr. Clark didn’t seek to enrich himself from Yosemite Valley or the Sequoia Trees. He did try to make a living though. He ran a modest hotel and guide service, but was a poor business man who was constantly in debt. “Clark’s Station” in Wawona, for example, had several more employees than required for the number of guests and its short season. Toward the end of his life Mr. Clark was desperately poor. He wasn’t a great book writer, but due to his popularity and need to make a living, wrote three books on Yosemite.
  • Sequoia & Kings Canyon

    Sequoia & Kings Canyon

    NATIONAL SEQUOIA & KINGS CANYON PARKS & SEQUOIA NATIONAL FORES T/ GIANT SEQUOIA NATIONAL MONUMENT LATE SUMMER 2008 GUIDE Free Activities • page 3 page 8 • Facilities & Ranger Programs in Sequoia Road & Safety Tips / Finding Gasoline • page 5 page 9 • Facilities & Programs in Kings Canyon & USFS Shuttle & Highlights in Sequoia Park • page 6 page 10 • Camping & Lodging / Bears & Your Food Highlights in Kings Canyon & USFS • page 7 page 12 • Park Road Map Surprises in the Wilderness The quest to uncover the secrets and backcountry is commonly vertical. What surprises of wilderness draws 80,000 vis - isn’t forest, lakes, meadows, and streams itors every year to the backcountry of is covered by rocks or house-size boul - Sequoia & Kings Canyon parks. ders, snowfields, glaciers, and slabs of Some secrets are botanical: Why do rock. Wilderness isn’t simply big. It’s foxtail pine only grow at high elevation? huge. Little things get lost very easily. Some are avian: What is it about snow - Something else about wilderness: fields that attract rosy finches? There are times when you are so alone, Other wilderness surprises amaze and so completely isolated, knowing for cer - delight: A slow-moving stream quickly tain that not another pair of human eyes becomes a rapid torrent with many are enjoying this sight. You own it all — waterfalls. A boulder field suddenly water, earth and sky, forest, wildflowers, opens up to disclose a “pocket meadow” trails, rocks, marmot and cony, and the overflowing with teenie-weenie yellow rosy finch and occasional raptor that monkey-flowers. A back bear saunters come up on a thermal to look around past your kitchen at dinner time, ignor - before soaring home in their slow, ing your precious food supply to forage methodical, business-like way.
  • (ZBA-CAL) Zoning Board of Appeals Variances

    (ZBA-CAL) Zoning Board of Appeals Variances

    (ZBA-CAL) Zoning Board of Appeals variances 9/2/2015 A_CODESUFX A_APPLNUM NAME ADDRESS DECISION A_COMMENT A_MAPA_LOT A_DATE ZONE CAL 1942 4 ROSS, ALAN 1015 BOSTON POST ROAD erection of frame garage 73 15 4/22/1942 B CAL 1942 6 LENTZ, FRANK 29 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD to render valid the existence of two houses 3 110 4/23/1942 A CAL 1942 6 LENTZ, FRANK 486 HOYT STREET to render valid the existence of two houses 3 138 4/23/1942 A CAL 1942 7 CURTIS, MAYBEL 98 HOLMES AVENUE side variance, families per acre variance 48 124 6/3/1942 B CAL 1942 8 RYLE, JOSEPH CAL 1942 9 TERRY, JOHN 322 WEST AVENUE relocation of garage on same lot 23 72 6/11/1942 CAL 1942 10 ARTHUR OLSON, INC 11 DEVON ROAD GR GR- construction to premises 24 86 6/6/1942 CAL 1942 11 RAYMOND, FANNIE BOSTON POST ROAD DN DN- extension of building 7/10/1942 CAL 1942 12 BAKER, CARL 1120 BOSTON POST ROAD DN DN- manufacture of war materials 72 23-24 9/8/1942 B CAL 1942 13 MONTGOMERY WARD & C 10 CHERRY STREET apply zoning rules in respect to variance 41 40 10/8/1942 B CAL 1942 14 VOGEL, RICHARD FIVE MILE RIVER ROAD GR GR- to make property line lawful 67 10 11/12/1942 AA CAL 1942 15 LENTZ, FRANK HOYT STREET to render valid existence of house at right of wa 8 12/9/1942 A CAL 1942 16 ALEXANDER, CHAS 780 BOSTON POST ROAD GR GR- extension of time to desist manufacturing o 16 88 12/10/1942 B CAL 1942 16 ALEXANDER, CHAS 780 BOSTON POST ROAD DN DN- to use the premises for manufacturing war 16 107 12/10/1942 B CAL 1943 1 HARVEY, HANNAH 89 BUTTONWOOD LANE GR GR- to validate existence of dwelling 5 1 5/11/1943
  • John Theodore Buchholz

    John Theodore Buchholz

    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 30 | Issue 1 Article 3 2012 John Theodore Buchholz (1888-1951) Studying Conifers in California, Especially Sequoiadendron and Sequoia (Cupressaceae) in 1936 Rudolf Schmid University of California, Berkeley Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Recommended Citation Schmid, Rudolf (2012) "John Theodore Buchholz (1888-1951) Studying Conifers in California, Especially Sequoiadendron and Sequoia (Cupressaceae) in 1936," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 30: Iss. 1, Article 3. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol30/iss1/3 Aliso, 30(1), pp. 5–17 ’ 2012, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden JOHN THEODORE BUCHHOLZ (1888–1951) STUDYING CONIFERS IN CALIFORNIA, ESPECIALLY SEQUOIADENDRON AND SEQUOIA (CUPRESSACEAE) IN 1936 RUDOLF SCHMID1 1Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3140, USA ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Biographical details are given for John Theodore Buchholz (1888–1951), including his interest in conifers of California and New Caledonia. Buchholz made detailed studies of the vegetative morphology, reproductive morphology, and embryology of Sequoiadendron giganteum and Sequoia sempervirens prior to his 1939 segregation of Sequoiadendron from Sequoia. Buchholz, a professor at the University of Illinois (1929–1951), spent spring and summer of his 1936 sabbatical in California. Description of Buchholz’s technique for morphological collections provides

  • Sequoia and Kings Canyon

    SEQUOIA AND KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARNBa»CALI»ORNjA Sixty Lakes Basin, Kings Canyon National Park Lying across the heart of the Sierra Nevada in east central Although the two parks have many similar features, you see without guidance—but, for safety's sake, not alone. the mountains. Stay on the trails. Avoid trips alone. Tell California, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks em­ will learn, as you explore and observe, that each park has You may fish, take a saddle-horse trip, follow the close-in one of your party or a park ranger where you are going and brace more than 1,300 square miles of spectacular granite its own distinctive character. trails, hike into the mountains. when you expect to be back. mountains, deep canyons, and magnificent forests. Jeweled Your car. Some mountain roads are crooked and steep. lakes and tumbling waterfalls adorn this glacier-carved land­ So always drive on your own side. Drive slowly and shift into PLANNING YOUR TIME TO HAVE A TROUBLE-FREE VISIT scape. From west to east, the two parks extend from the second or low gear to control your speed. Continuous use foothills near the San Joaquin Valley to the crest of the Depending upon your point of entry and route of travel While here, you are living a life different in two respects of your brakes may cause them to overheat; this may result High Sierra. From north to south, they stretch some 65 within the parks, you should first learn about the features from your normal life: (1) You are in a National Park that in loss of control of your car.
  • Wedge Canyon Fire

    Wedge Canyon Fire

    Rough Fire August 26, 2015, Morning Closures & Advisories: Summary: Sierra National Forest issued a closure order for the Rough Fire area. Containment has been established along the Middle Fork The Hume Lake Ranger District, Jenny Lakes of Kings River to the corner of the confluence with the Wilderness and Monarch Wilderness, including North Fork including the area around Balch Camp. Forest Road 12S01, 12S01E, and 12S19 in the Sequoia Highlands area of the Sequoia National The fire was active north of Highway 180 and west of Forest remain closed. Junction Vista Point. Sustained crown runs occurred from McKinley Grove Rd. (11S40) is closed at Wishon the canyon bottoms to ridgetops. Crews are engaged in Dam, including the 11S07. perimeter control connecting fire lines down to Kings 10S24 is closed from the intersection of 11S91 to River and from Cherry Gap to McKenzie Ridge. Today, air where it meets 11S40 at Buck Meadow. resources will continue to be utilized in this area. Fire 11S12 Rd. (Salt Flat Rd.) is closed at McKinley crews are coordinating closely with agency resource Grove Rd. advisors to protect natural and cultural resources at risk Trimmer Springs Road at Kirch Flat. in Converse Basin. Approximately 12,000 feet of hose Open has been placed to protect the Boole Tree, Chicago Parts of the Grant Grove and Wilsonia areas of Stump and sensitive wildlife habitats in that area. Kings Canyon National Park are now open. The General Grant Tree, Panoramic Point, John Muir The fire continues to burn east into Boulder Creek Lodge, Grant Grove Cabins, Visitor Center, park Drainage threatening Lockwood, Evans and Kennedy trails, restaurant, market and gift shop are now Groves.
  • Giant Sequoia National Monument, Draft Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 1 Chapter 3 Affected Environment

    Giant Sequoia National Monument, Draft Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 1 Chapter 3 Affected Environment

    United States Department of Giant Sequoia Agriculture Forest Service National Monument Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Environmental Impact Statement August 2010 Volume 1 The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Chapter 3 - Affected Environment Giant Sequoia National Monument, Draft Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 1 Chapter 3 Affected Environment Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Draft Environmental Impact Statement 2 Chapter 3 Affected Environment Chapter 3 Affected Environment Chapter 3 describes the affected environment or existing condition by resource area, as each is currently managed. This is the baseline condition against which environmental effects are evaluated and from which progress toward the desired condition can be measured. Vegetation, including Giant Sequoia Groves Vegetation within the Giant Sequoia National Monument can be grouped into ecological units with similar climatic, geology, soils, and vegetation communities. These units fall within three categories: oak woodlands/grasslands, shrublands/chaparral, and forestlands. The forested category between 5,000 and 7,000 feet in elevation, spanning the Monument from north to south, is dominated by mixed conifer and its variants.