DOCSLIB.ORG

Fish Passage Plan Corps of Engineers Projects US Army Corps R of Engineers CENWD-PDW-R Northwestern Division

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fish Passage Plan Corps of Engineers Projects US Army Corps R of Engineers CENWD-PDW-R Northwestern Division Fish Passage Plan Corps of Engineers Projects US Army Corps R of Engineers CENWD-PDW-R Northwestern Division March 2006 February 2006 Table of Contents Section 1 Overview 1. Fish Passage Plan .............................. OV- 1 1.1. Overview ....................................... OV- 1 1.2. Emergency Deviations from FPP .................. OV- 2 1.3. Technical Management Team ...................... OV- 2 1.4. Spill at Corps Mainstem Projects ............... OV- 3 1.5. Total Dissolved Gas Monitoring ................. OV- 3 1.6. System Load Shaping ............................ OV- 4 1.7. Juvenile Fish Transportation Plan .............. OV- 4 1.8. Project Fish Passage Facilities Inspection and Reporting Criteria ............................. OV- 4 1.9. Turbine Dewatering Procedure at Chief Joseph Dam ............................... OV- 5 1.10. Implementation of the Fish Passage Plan ........ OV- 5 Section 2 Bonneville Dam 1. Fish Passage Information .......................BON- 1 1.1. Juvenile Fish Passage ..........................BON- 1 1.2. Adult Fish Passage .............................BON- 9 2. Project Operation ..............................BON-11 2.1. General ........................................BON-11 2.2. Spill Management ...............................BON-12 2.3. Total Dissolved Gas Management and Control .....BON-14 2.4. Juvenile Fish Passage Facilities ...............BON-15 2.5. Adult Fish Passage Facilities ..................BON-23 3. Facility Monitoring and Reporting ..............BON-28 3.1 Inspections ....................................BON-28 3.2 Zebra Mussel Monitoring ........................BON-29 3.3 Reporting ......................................BON-29 4. Fish Facilities Maintenance ....................BON-30 4.1. General ........................................BON-30 4.2. Juvenile Fish Passage Facilities ...............BON-30 4.3. Adult Fish Passage Facilities ..................BON-33 5. Turbine Unit Operation and Maintenance .........BON-39 6. Dewatering Plans ...............................BON-40 6.1 General Guidelines .............................BON-40 6.2 Juvenile bypass Systems ........................BON-40 6.3 Adult Fish Ladder ..............................BON-40 6.4 Powerhouse Fish Collection System ..............BON-41 6.5 Turbines .......................................BON-42 i February 2006 7. Forebay Debris Removal .........................BON-42 8. Response to Hazardous Materials Spills .........BON-43 Section 3 The Dalles Dam 1. Fish Passage Information .......................TDA- 1 1.1. Juvenile Fish Passage ..........................TDA- 1 1.2. Adult Fish Passage .............................TDA- 1 2. Project Operation ..............................TDA- 7 2.1. General ........................................TDA- 7 2.2. Spill Management ...............................TDA- 7 2.3. Total Dissolved Gas Management and Control .....TDA- 8 2.4. Juvenile Fish Passage Facilities ...............TDA- 8 2.5. Adult Fish Passage Facilities ..................TDA-11 2.6. Facility Monitoring and Reporting...............TDA-14 3. Fish Facilities Maintenance ....................TDA-14 3.1. General ........................................TDA-14 3.2. Juvenile Fish Passage Facilities ...............TDA-15 3.3. Adult Fish Passage Facilities ..................TDA-17 4. Turbine Unit Operation and Maintenance .........TDA-20 5. Dewatering Plans ...............................TDA-21 5.4 Adult Fish Ladder...............................TDA-21 5.5 Powerhouse Collection System....................TDA-23 5.6 Turbines........................................TDA-23 6. Forebay Debris Removal..........................TDA-24 Section 4 John Day Dam 1. Fish Passage Information .......................JDA- 1 1.1. Juvenile Fish Passage ..........................JDA- 1 1.2. Adult Fish Passage .............................JDA- 6 2. Project Operation. .............................JDA- 7 2.1. General ........................................JDA- 7 2.2. Spill Management ...............................JDA- 8 2.3. Dissolved Gas Management and Control ...........JDA- 8 2.4. Juvenile Fish Passage Facilities................JDA- 8 2.5. Adult Fish Passage Facilities ..................JDA-14 2.6. Facility Monitoring and Reports ................JDA-17 3. Fish Facilities Maintenance ....................JDA-18 3.1. General ........................................JDA-18 3.2. Juvenile Fish Passage Facilities ...............JDA-18 3.3. Adult Fish Passage Facilities ..................JDA-21 4. Turbine Unit Operation and Maintenance .........JDA-24 5. Dewatering Plans ...............................JDA-25 5.1 Adult Fish Ladders..............................JDA-25 5.2 Powerhouse Fish Collection System ..............JDA-26 5.3 Juvenile Bypass System .........................JDA-26 ii February 2006 5.4 Turbines .......................................JDA-27 6. Forebay Debris Removal..........................JDA-27 7. Endnotes .......................................JDA-28 Section 5 McNary Dam 1. Fish Passage Information .......... ............ MCN- 1 1.1. Juvenile Fish Passage .......................... MCN- 1 1.2. Adult Fish Passage ............................. MCN- 1 2. Project Operation .............................. MCN- 5 2.1. Spill Management ............................... MCN- 5 2.2. Dissolved Gas Management and Control ........... MCN- 6 2.3. Operating Criteria ............................. MCN- 6 3. Project Maintenance ............................ MCN-17 3.1. Juvenile Fish Passage Facilities ............... MCN-18 3.2. Adult Fish Passage Facilities .................. MCN-21 4. Turbine Unit Operation and Maintenance ......... MCN-24 4.1. Turbine Unit Operation ......................... MCN-24 4.2. Turbine Unit Maintenance ....................... MCN-27 5. Forebay Debris Removal ......................... MCN-29 Section 6 Ice Harbor Dam 1. Fish Passage Information .......... ............ IHR- 1 1.1. Juvenile Fish Passage .......................... IHR- 1 1.2. Adult Fish Passage ............................. IHR- 1 2. Project Operation .............................. IHR- 4 2.1. Spill Management ............................... IHR- 4 2.2. Dissolved Gas Management and Control ........... IHR- 5 2.3. Operating Criteria ............................. IHR- 5 3. Project Maintenance ............................ IHR-15 3.1. Juvenile Fish Passage Facilities ............... IHR-15 3.2. Adult Fish Passage Facilities .................. IHR-18 4. Turbine Unit Operation and Maintenance ......... IHR-21 4.1. Turbine Unit Operation ......................... IHR-21 4.2. Turbine Unit Outages During High River Flow Periods .................................. IHR-26 4.3. Turbine Unit Maintenance ....................... IHR-27 5. Forebay Debris Removal ......................... IHR-28 iii February 2006 Section 7 Lower Monumental Dam 1. Fish Passage Information .......... ............ LMN- 1 1.1. Juvenile Fish Passage .......................... LMN- 1 1.2. Adult Fish Passage ............................. LMN- 4 2. Project Operation .............................. LMN- 5 2.1. Spill Management ............................... LMN- 5 2.2. Dissolved Gas Management and Control ........... LMN- 5 2.3. Operating Criteria ............................. LMN- 6 3. Project Maintenance ............................ LMN-15 3.1. Juvenile Fish Passage Facilities ............... LMN-16 3.2. Adult Fish Passage Facilities .................. LMN-18 4. Turbine Unit Operation and Maintenance ......... LMN-20 4.1. Turbine Unit Operation ......................... LMN-20 4.2. Turbine Unit Outages During High River Flow Periods .................................. LMN-22 4.3. Turbine Unit Maintenance ....................... LMN-29 5. Forebay Debris Removal ......................... LMN-31 Section 8 Little Goose Dam 1. Fish Passage Information .......... ............ LGS- 1 1.1. Juvenile Fish Passage .......................... LGS- 1 1.2. Adult Fish Passage ............................. LGS- 1 2. Project Operations ............................. LGS- 5 2.1. Spill Management ............................... LGS- 5 2.2. Dissolved Gas Management and Control ........... LGS- 5 2.3. Operating Criteria ............................. LGS- 5 3. Project Maintenance ............................ LGS-15 3.1. Juvenile Fish Passage Facilities ............... LGS-16 3.2. Adult Fish Passage Facilities .................. LGS-19 4. Turbine Unit Operation and Maintenance ......... LGS-21 4.1. Turbine Unit Operation ......................... LGS-21 4.2. Turbine Unit Outages During High River Flow Periods .................................. LGS-22 4.3. Turbine Unit Maintenance ....................... LGS-28 5. Forebay Debris Removal ......................... LGS-30 iv February 2006 Section 9 Lower Granite Dam 1. Fish Passage Information .......... ............ LWG- 1 1.1. Juvenile Fish Passage .......................... LWG- 1 1.2. Adult Fish Passage ............................. LWG- 1 2. Project Operation .............................. LWG- 6 2.1. Spill Management ............................... LWG- 6 2.2. Dissolved Gas Management and Control ........... LWG- 6 2.3. Operating Criteria ............................. LWG- 7 3. Project Maintenance ............................ LWG-18 3.1. Juvenile Fish Passage Facilities ............... LWG-18 3.2. Adult Fish Passage Facilities .................. LWG-21 4. Turbine Unit Operation and Maintenance ......... LWG-23 4.1. Turbine Unit Operation ......................... LWG-23
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oregon Department of Forestry Equipment & Personnel Rate Guide 2019
    Oregon Department of Forestry Equipment & Personnel Rate Guide 2019 Finance i Table of Contents Page Definitions 1 General Provisions 2 - 4 Payment Provisions 5 - 8 Responsibilities and Procedures 9 - 10 Forms, Filing System, and Supply 10 - 11 Emergency Personnel Rates 12 - 19 Heavy Equipment Rates 20 - 25 Water Handling Rates 26 - 27 Support Equipment Rates 27 - 28 Mileage and Hours Chart 29 - 32 Finance ii Definitions Administratively Determined (AD)/Emergency Hire Employee: An individual who is hired at the AD Wage Rate and paid directly by the Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF) when extra capacity is required to meet the objectives of an incident. Check-In Form: Required documentation that records resource information such as: resource order number, contact information, equipment type, and rate of pay. Required for contract crews, equipment, and overhead personnel. Must be signed by vendor/operator. District Business Manager (DBM): The ODF staff person responsible for all incident business related matters in each district. Previously titled Office Manager or OM. Guarantee: For each calendar day that heavy equipment is under hire, the amount earned for that day will be no less than 2.5 hours. OF 286: Summarized emergency equipment invoice. All time recorded on equipment shift tickets will be posted on this form. Signature is required for payment. OF 288: Summarized emergency personnel invoice. All time recorded on shift tickets will be posted on this form. Signature is required for payment. On Shift (Compensable) Time: Employees are compensated for on shift time. On shift time includes travel to and from the point of hire and/or other travel necessary for the performance of work (such as from base camp to fire line), actual hours worked, and time when an individual is held, by direction or ordered, to a specific location fully outfitted, and ready for assignment.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Coast Steelhead Management Meeting
    SUMMARY OF THE TWELFTH PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MANAGEMENT MEETING March 9-11, 2010 Eagle Crest Resort - Redmond, Oregon Sponsored by: Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission & U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY……..…………………………………………………………………………...1 II. STEELHEAD STOCK STATUS REVIEW AND ESA……………………………….....3 A. California....................................................................................................................................... 3 B. Oregon ........................................................................................................................................... 4 C. Idaho .............................................................................................................................................. 4 D. Washington ................................................................................................................................... 5 E. Alaska ............................................................................................................................................ 6 F. Progress Report on Developing Viability Criteria for Threatened Puget Sound Steelhead -- Jeff Hard, NOAA Fisheries ....................................................................................... 7 III. REINTRODUCTION OF STEELHEAD ........................................................................8 A. Documenting Onchorhynchus mykiss Life Histories in Rattlesnake Creek and White Salmon River Prior to the Reintroduction of Anadromous Fish Above Condit
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Passage Structures at Bonneville and John Day Dams by Pacific Lamprey, 2013 and 2014
    Technical Report 2015-11-DRAFT USE OF PASSAGE STRUCTURES AT BONNEVILLE AND JOHN DAY DAMS BY PACIFIC LAMPREY, 2013 AND 2014 by M.A. Kirk, C.C. Caudill, C.J. Noyes, E.L. Johnson, S.R. Lee, and M.L. Keefer Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-1136 and H. Zobott, J.C. Syms, R. Budwig, and D. Tonina Center for Ecohydraulics Research University of Idaho Boise, ID 83702 for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Portland District 2015 Technical Report 2015-11-DRAFT USE OF PASSAGE STRUCTURES AT BONNEVILLE AND JOHN DAY DAMS BY PACIFIC LAMPREY, 2013 AND 2014 by M.A. Kirk, C.C. Caudill, C.J. Noyes, E.L. Johnson, S.R. Lee, and M.L. Keefer Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-1136 and H. Zobott, J.C. Syms, R. Budwig, and D. Tonina Center for Ecohydraulics Research University of Idaho Boise, ID 83702 for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Portland District 2015 i Acknowledgements This project was financed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District and was facilitated by Sean Tackley. We would like to thank Andy Traylor, Brian Bissell, Ida Royer, Ben Hausman, Miro Zyndol, Dale Klindt and the additional project biologists at Bonneville and John Day dams who provided on-site support. We would like to thank Dan Joosten, Kaan Oral, Inga Aprans, Noah Hubbard, Mike Turner, Robert Escobar, Kate Abbott, Matt Dunkle, Chuck Boggs, Les Layng, and Jeff Garnett from the University of Idaho for assisting with the construction, maintenance, and field sampling associated with both Lamprey Passage Structures (LPSs).
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Life History of Oncorhynchus Mykiss in the South Fork John Day River Basin, Oregon
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Ian A. Tattam for the degree of Master of Science in Fisheries Science presented on December 22, 2006. Title: Seasonal Life History of Oncorhynchus mykiss in the South Fork John Day River Basin, Oregon Abstract approved: ______________________________________________ Hiram W. Li Understanding seasonal changes in growth, survival, and movement rates is crucial to salmonid management. These life history characteristics provide a context for evaluation of management actions. We evaluated the life history of individually marked Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri in the South Fork John Day River basin in Northeastern Oregon. This thesis focuses on Murderers and Black Canyon creeks, two tributaries to the South Fork John Day. These are semi-arid, mid elevation basins with naturally reproducing populations of summer steelhead and redband trout (both O. mykiss). Summer steelhead populations in this basin have declined from historic abundances, and are protected under the Endangered Species Act. In Chapter 2, we evaluate life history variation in Murderers Creek during four consecutive seasons. Growth rate varied significantly with season (F3,88 = 62.56, P < 0.0001), with most growth occurring during spring. Location and season interacted (F6,88 = 4.45, P < 0.001) to influence individual growth rates. As a result, regions of high growth potential shifted up and down-stream seasonally. However, we found low rates of O. mykiss movement (< 3 %) in Murderers Creek during summer, suggesting that individuals did not track resource availability at a large scale. Apparent survival rate varied among reaches, but was consistently higher in the upstream most reach compared to the two lowermost reaches.
    [Show full text]
  • John Day Fossil Beds NM: Geology and Paleoenvironments of the Clarno Unit
    John Day Fossil Beds NM: Geology and Paleoenvironments of the Clarno Unit JOHN DAY FOSSIL BEDS Geology and Paleoenvironments of the Clarno Unit John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon GEOLOGY AND PALEOENVIRONMENTS OF THE CLARNO UNIT John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon By Erick A. Bestland, PhD Erick Bestland and Associates, 1010 Monroe St., Eugene, OR 97402 Gregory J. Retallack, PhD Department of Geological Sciences University of Oregon Eugene, OR 7403-1272 June 28, 1994 Final Report NPS Contract CX-9000-1-10009 TABLE OF CONTENTS joda/bestland-retallack1/index.htm Last Updated: 21-Aug-2007 http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/joda/bestland-retallack1/index.htm[4/18/2014 12:20:25 PM] John Day Fossil Beds NM: Geology and Paleoenvironments of the Clarno Unit (Table of Contents) JOHN DAY FOSSIL BEDS Geology and Paleoenvironments of the Clarno Unit John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER ABSTRACT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION AND REGIONAL GEOLOGY INTRODUCTION PREVIOUS WORK AND REGIONAL GEOLOGY Basement rocks Clarno Formation John Day Formation CHAPTER II: GEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK INTRODUCTION Stratigraphic nomenclature Radiometric age determinations CLARNO FORMATION LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC UNITS Lower Clarno Formation units Main section JOHN DAY FORMATION LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC UNITS Lower Big Basin Member Middle and upper Big Basin Member Turtle Cove Member GEOCHEMISTRY OF LAVA FLOW AND TUFF UNITS Basaltic lava flows Geochemistry of andesitic units Geochemistry of tuffs STRUCTURE OF CLARNO
    [Show full text]
  • AN ABSTRACT of the THESIS of Sarah Ashley Bromley for the Degree of Master of Science in Geology Presented on June 7, 2011. Titl
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Sarah Ashley Bromley for the degree of Master of Science in Geology presented on June 7, 2011. Title: Evolution and Inheritance of Cascadia Sub-arc Mantle Reservoirs Abstract approved: Anita L. Grunder Inheritance from pre-existing mantle domains and fluid and melt contributions from active subduction together produce the geochemical signatures of mantle-derived arc basalts. In this context, this work evaluates the evolution of Cascadia mantle sources by documenting the isotopic and compositional characteristics of primitive basalts along a transect across the Eocene-Oligocene Proto-Cascadia (EOPC) arc at ~44.5-45.5° N. Primitive EOPC flows, dikes, and sills are exposed across a ~300 km transect that includes the Oregon Coast Range in the Cascadia forearc, the Western Cascades, flanking the modern arc, and the John Day and Eastern Clarno formations east of the Cascades. Like the modern arc, EOPC was built upon accreted terranes of western North America and within the Columbia embayment, which is lithosphere of oceanic affinity that crops out as the Siletzia terrane in the forearc and extends beneath the arc to the backarc. Potential mantle source reservoirs for EOPC magmas include contributions from mantle domains related to pre-existing underlying terranes, distinct North America lithosphere, and depleted Pacific-like upper mantle. In addition, the geochemical characteristics of EOPC magmas have likely been overprinted by subduction processes. Major, trace element, and isotopic data from the EOPC reveal a heterogeneous mantle source that was variably influenced by subduction processes. In the forearc, the high field strength (HFSE) enriched basalts of the Oregon Coast Range represent low degree partial melts of a relatively enriched mantle source.
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Telemetry Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Passage and Survival at John Day Dam, 2011
    PNNL-22266 Prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District, under an Interagency Agreement with the U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Acoustic Telemetry Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Passage and Survival at John Day Dam, 2011 FINAL REPORT Pacific Northwest National Laboratory University of Washington Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission June 2013 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by BATTELLE for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Printed in the United States of America Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062; ph: (865) 576-8401 fax: (865) 576-5728 email: [email protected] Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Range Interpretive Plan, John Day Fossil Beds National Monument
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior John Day Fossil Beds National Monument John Day Fossil Beds National Monument Long-Range Interpretive Plan John Day Fossil Beds National Monument Long-Range Interpretive Plan Prepared by: Interpretive Planning, Harpers Ferry Center, and John Day Fossil Beds National Monument March 2010 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cover Photo: A Saber-toothed Nimravid from the Turtle Cove Assemblage. Photo Credits: All photo credits are NPS, unless otherwise noted Table of Contents Introduction 1 Introduction 1 The Planning Process 2 Executive Summary 3 Foundation for Planning 10 Legislation 10 Background for Planning 11 Purpose and Signifi cance Statements 16 Interpretive Themes 17 Visitor Experience Goals 18 Existing Conditions 20 Visitor Profi les 20 Personal Services 22 The Sheep Rock Unit 28 The Clarno Unit 38 The Painted Hills Unit 44 Partnerships 48 Recommendations 51 Parkwide Recommendations 51 Sheep Rock Unit Recommendations 65 Clarno Unit Recommendations 70 Painted Hills Unit Recommendations 74 Appendices 78 Appendix A: Park Legislation 78 Appendix B: Summary of the JODA Annual Servicewide Interpretive Reports, FY 2002 - 2008 80 Appendix C: I&VS Program Breakdown from 2005-2008 by Park Unit 82 Appendix D: JODA Natural and Cultural Resource Project, Studies and Programming Ideas 83 Appendix E: Maximizing Visitor Understanding of the Park Paleontology Program 87 Appendix F: The Park Implementation Plan 90 Appendix G: Future Educational Programming Ideas from the LRIP Workshop 92 Appendix H: The Early Years of JODA Interpretation 96 Appendix I: Bibliography 99 Appendix J: The Park Planning Team 101 Introduction This map illustrates the location of the three units of John Day Fossil Beds National Monument.
    [Show full text]
  • Turbine Optimization for Passage of Juvenile Salmon at John Day Dam
    HASE ROJECT PPENDIX P II P A TURBINE OPTIMIZATION FOR PASSAGE OF JUVENILE SALMON AT JOHN DAY DAM John Day Lock and Dam located on the Columbia River near Rufus, Oregon. PREPARED BY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS TURBINE SURVIVAL PROGRAM SEPTEMBER 2013 REVISION 0 Turbine Optimization for Passage of Juvenile Salmon, John Day Project Appendix, Revision 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report identifies operating conditions for turbine units at John Day Dam on the Columbia River, where turbine fish passage survival is expected to be higher based on using the tools developed by the Turbine Survival Program (TSP). The 2004 TSP Phase I Report indentified that operating conditions of large Kaplan turbine units appear to have a significant effect on the survival of fish passing through them. This TSP Phase II Project Appendix involves identifying target operating range (TOR) and the targets for project operations. To reduce strike injuries to fish, the physical geometry of John Day’s turbine components was examined. As flow increased, the wicket gates open up and the blade angles steepen. The wicket gates achieve the best alignment with the stay vanes over a 7-degree rotational range from 36 to 43 degrees open. However, the maximum wicket gate opening is often restricted by other constraints such as generator limit. Additional information to reduce strike frequency, exposure to shear, and turbulent environments came from 1:25 Froude scale model constructed at the Engineering Research and Development Center of a John Day turbine unit. High-speed video of neutrally buoyant beads was taken to assess the strike frequency and severity.
    [Show full text]
  • Dive Operations by Contract
    1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT J 1 2 2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable) 0001 29-Apr-2021 6. ISSUED BY CODE W9127N 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6) CODE USACE, PORTLAND DISTRICT 333 SW 1ST AVE See Item 6 PORTLAND OR 97204 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. X W9127N21B0014 X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) 21-Apr-2021 10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO. 10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13) CODE FACILITY CODE 11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended. Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods: (a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying Barotrauma Risk to Juvenile Fish During Hydro-Turbine Passage
    Fisheries Research 154 (2014) 152–164 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fisheries Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fishres Quantifying barotrauma risk to juvenile fish during hydro-turbine passage Marshall C. Richmond a,∗, John A. Serkowski a, Laurie L. Ebner b, Mirjam Sick c, Richard S. Brown d, Thomas J. Carlson e a Hydrology Group, Earth Systems Science Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States b Portland District, US Army Corps of Engineers, Portland, OR, United States c Andritz Hydro, Zurich, Switzerland d Ecology Group, Earth Systems Science Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States e Coastal Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Sequim, WA, United States article info abstract Article history: We introduce a method for hydro turbine biological performance assessment (BioPA) to bridge the gap Received 4 October 2013 between field and laboratory studies on fish injury and turbine engineering design. Using this method, Received in revised form 2 January 2014 a suite of biological performance indicators is computed based on simulated data from a computational Accepted 11 January 2014 fluid dynamics (CFD) model of a proposed hydro turbine design. Each performance indicator is a measure Available online 15 March 2014 of the probability of exposure to a certain dose of an injury mechanism. If the relationship between the dose of an injury mechanism (stressor) and frequency of injury (dose–response) is known from laboratory Keywords: or field studies, the likelihood of fish injury for a turbine design can be computed from the performance Turbine Hydropower indicator. By comparing the values of the indicators from various turbine designs, engineers and biologists Fish passage can identify the more-promising designs and operating conditions to minimize hydraulic conditions Salmon hazardous to passing fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Issue Vol. 26 No. 4
    Swedish American Genealogist Volume 26 | Number 4 Article 1 12-1-2006 Full Issue Vol. 26 No. 4 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/swensonsag Part of the Genealogy Commons, and the Scandinavian Studies Commons Recommended Citation (2006) "Full Issue Vol. 26 No. 4," Swedish American Genealogist: Vol. 26 : No. 4 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/swensonsag/vol26/iss4/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Swenson Swedish Immigration Research Center at Augustana Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Swedish American Genealogist by an authorized editor of Augustana Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. (ISSN 0275-9314) A journal devoted to Swedish American biography, genealogy, and personal history Volume XXVI December 2006 No. 4 CONTENTS A Pioneer From the 1850s ..................................... 1 by Hans Mattson Copyright © 2006 (ISSN 0275-9314) Moonshadows .......................................................... 5 by Dennis L. Johnson Swedish American Genealogist Augustana Summer School in Sweden .............. 8 Publisher: by Christina Peterson Swenson Swedish Immigration Research Center Augustana College, Rock Island, IL 61201-2296 An Almost Forgotten Tragedy at Sea ............... 10 Telephone: 309-794-7204. Fax: 309-794-7443 by Elisabeth Thorsell E-mail: [email protected] Web address: http://www.augustana.edu/swenson/ The Eksjö Emigrant Monument ........................ 13 by Elisabeth Thorsell Editor: Elisabeth Thorsell Hästskovägen 45, 177 39 Järfälla, Sweden A Handwriting Example, XII ............................. 14 E-mail: [email protected] Bits & Pieces .......................................................... 15 Editor Emeritus: Nils William Olsson, Ph.D., F.A.S.G., Winter Park, FL The Old Picture ..................................................... 16 Contributing Editor: Peter S.
    [Show full text]