DOCSLIB.ORG

THE COMMISSION’ © Commonwealth of Australia 2003 ISBN 1 74037 139 9 This Work Is Subject to Copyright

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE COMMISSION’ © Commonwealth of Australia 2003 ISBN 1 74037 139 9 This Work Is Subject to Copyright FROM INDUSTRY ASSISTANCE TO PRODUCTIVITY: 30 YEARS OF ‘THE COMMISSION’ © Commonwealth of Australia 2003 ISBN 1 74037 139 9 This work is subject to copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, the work may be reproduced in whole or in part for study or training purposes, subject to the inclusion of an acknowledg- ment of the source. Reproduction for commercial use or sale requires prior written permission from the Department of Communications, IT and the Arts. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Intellectual Property Branch, Department of Communications, IT and the Arts, GPO Box 2154, Canberra ACT 2601. This publication is available in hard copy or PDF format from the Productivity Commission website at www.pc.gov.au. If you require part or all of this publica- tion in a different format, please contact Media and Publications (see below). Publications Inquiries: Media and Publications Productivity Commission Locked Bag 2 Collins Street East Melbourne VIC 8003 Tel: (03) 9653 2244 Fax: (03) 9653 2303 Email: [email protected] General Inquiries: Tel: (03) 9653 2100 or (02) 6240 3200 An appropriate citation for this paper is: Productivity Commission 2003, From industry assistance to productivity: 30 years of ‘the Commission’, Productivity Commission, Canberra. Cover Design: Imagine Graphics Bert Kelly: Photo by Jennie Niccol courtesy The Centre for Independent Studies. Alf Rattigan: Photo courtesy of the Rattigan family. Foreword It is 30 years since the Industries Assistance Commission, the first predecessor of the Productivity Commission, was created by Act of Parliament. To mark that milestone, it seemed appropriate to provide an account of the institution’s activities over those three decades. For an organisation to write its own history can be fraught, especially if, like this one, it has undergone several transformations and generated considerable controversy along the way. Our purpose, however, has been a modest one: to provide a brief ‘document of record’, eschewing historical interpretation (enticing though it may be). Disentangling the two is not always easy, of course, and we may not always have succeeded. Indeed, looking back from the vantage point of the Australian economy today, it is hard not to conclude that the efforts of the Commission, often against the grain of political or public opinion, have been worthwhile — and that the willingness of successive governments to sustain such an institution has been vindicated. The effectiveness of any institution is determined not only by its mandate and structure, but also by its people. This history is therefore also a tribute to the many people, at all levels, who have contributed to the organisation’s work over the years. And it reflects our appreciation of the role played by many people outside the organisation — in government, business, community groups and the media — who have participated actively in the Commission’s processes and thereby helped ensure the integrity of its findings and policy advice. Gary Banks Chairman Productivity Commission December 2003 FROM INDUSTRY ASSISTANCE TO PRODUCTIVITY: III 30 YEARS OF ‘THE COMMISSION’ Acknowledgments This paper was principally written by Margo Hone, under the guidance of Jonathan Pincus. It also contains contributions from various others within the Productivity Commission, including some who had worked for more than one of its predecessor organisations. Comments on an earlier draft from Professor Brian Galligan of the University of Melbourne and Graham Blinman, a former long-serving member of staff, are gratefully acknowledged. The Commission’s library staff also provided valuable assistance. FROM INDUSTRY ASSISTANCE TO PRODUCTIVITY: V 30 YEARS OF ‘THE COMMISSION’ Contents Preliminaries Foreword III Acknowledgments V Abbreviations XII Chapters 1 Introduction 1 A widening remit 2 A strong analytical tradition 4 Independent Commissioners and skilled staff 5 A quick guide 6 2 Deep roots: the Tariff Board 9 The Tariff Board’s traditional approach 9 A need for change 10 Political resistance to an ‘economic and efficient’ approach 11 The Whitlam Government and the Crawford Report 15 Birth of the IAC 16 3 The Industries Assistance Commission: the 1970s 21 Role and functions of the new Commission 21 Rise (and fall) of resourcing 25 Changing portfolios 26 The IAC’s approach 28 Coverage and focus of inquiries 29 Economic downturn and policy reversal 33 A change of government 37 The ‘adjustment problem’ 39 New reporting rules 41 An uneven balance sheet 42 FROM INDUSTRY ASSISTANCE TO PRODUCTIVITY: VII 30 YEARS OF ‘THE COMMISSION’ CONTENTS 4 The Industries Assistance Commission: the 1980s 45 Reporting in a recession 45 Enter the Hawke Government 46 The Uhrig Review 47 Towards broader reforms 52 A shift to the Treasury portfolio and ‘industry plans’ 53 General tariff cuts again 57 The push for ‘microeconomic reform’ 58 Changing international trade relations 62 More restructuring 63 5 The Industry Commission 67 The first merger 67 Directions for change 72 A second round of tariff cuts 73 Reforms to reduce business costs 75 Social and environmental issues 80 6 Forming the Productivity Commission 87 The Coalition’s plans for a Productivity Commission 87 The administrative merger 89 Business as usual 91 A rough passage through Parliament 93 7 The Productivity Commission 99 Building on strong foundations 99 A new work program 104 A ‘flexible’ institution 106 An ongoing role 122 VIII FROM INDUSTRY ASSISTANCE TO PRODUCTIVITY: 30 YEARS OF ‘THE COMMISSION’ CONTENTS Appendixes A Legislation and regulation 127 B Chairmen, Commissioners and senior staff 136 C Portfolio responsibility 145 D Inquiry reports 148 E History of assistance to two sectors: the textiles, clothing 167 and footwear, and automotive industries References Boxes 2.1 The Vernon Report 11 2.2 The protection debate and the Tariff Board 12 2.3 Gough Whitlam and John Stone reflect on the 25 per cent 15 tariff cut 2.4 Sir John Crawford’s proposal for a commission to advise 17 on assistance to industries 3.1 What’s in a name? 22 3.2 IMPACT and quantitative modelling 23 3.3 Portfolio responsibility: passing the parcel 27 3.4 The Tariff Review 30 3.5 Themes from IAC annual reports: the 1970s 32 3.6 Analytical tools used by the IAC and its successors 33 3.7 The perils of ‘temporary’ assistance 35 3.8 Resource cuts at the IAC in the 1970s 38 4.1 Approaches to general reductions in protection 45 4.2 The Uhrig Review of the IAC 48 4.3 The IAC’s diminishing role in anti-dumping 50 4.4 Inquiry on government (non-tax) charges 54 4.5 Disparities in assistance matter for welfare 55 4.6 The May 1988 Economic Statement 57 FROM INDUSTRY ASSISTANCE TO PRODUCTIVITY: IX 30 YEARS OF ‘THE COMMISSION’ CONTENTS 4.7 Themes from IAC annual reports: the 1980s 61 5.1 The Inter-State Commission and the Business Regulation 68 Review Unit 5.2 The Office of Regulation Review 69 5.3 Themes from Industry Commission annual reports 75 5.4 National Competition Policy 77 5.5 Quantifying the impact of Hilmer reforms 79 5.6 Performance indicators for social infrastructure 80 5.7 Impediments to regional adjustment: the Industry 82 Commission’s first foray into industrial relations 6.1 The Bureau of Industry Economics and the Economic 88 Planning Advisory Commission 7.1 The gambling report wins over some critics 100 7.2 Ensuring research adds value 101 7.3 Themes from Productivity Commission annual reports 107 7.4 The social costs and benefits of the gambling industries 109 7.5 Overcoming Indigenous disadvantage 111 7.6 Research on the conservation of biodiversity 112 7.7 Principles for policy formulation on structural adjustment 113 7.8 One more inquiry into automotive assistance 114 7.9 Adjustment issues are integral to TCF policy formulation 115 7.10 Productivity: the mainspring of living standards 116 7.11 The gains from trade liberalisation 119 7.12 The broadcasting inquiry 120 7.13 The Commonwealth Competitive Neutrality 121 Complaints Office X FROM INDUSTRY ASSISTANCE TO PRODUCTIVITY: 30 YEARS OF ‘THE COMMISSION’ CONTENTS Figures 3.1 Staff levels: Tariff Board to Productivity Commission 24 3.2 Annual appropriations: Tariff Board to 25 Productivity Commission 3.3 IAC structure, 1974 24 4.1 Dispersion in effective assistance for manufacturing industries 55 4.2 Falling average effective rates of assistance to 56 manufacturing and agriculture 4.3 Average effective rates of assistance to TCF, PMV and 56 manufacturing 5.1 Industry Commission structure, 1995 70 6.1 Interim Commission structure, 1997 89 7.1 Productivity Commission performance framework 105 Tables 3.1 Sectoral (and other) coverage of inquiry reports 29 6.1 Staff movements during the merger 90 FROM INDUSTRY ASSISTANCE TO PRODUCTIVITY: XI 30 YEARS OF ‘THE COMMISSION’ Abbreviations ABS Australian Bureau of Statistics ABARE Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics APEC Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation BACA Department of Business and Consumer Affairs BIE Bureau of Industry Economics BRRU Business Regulation Review Unit CCNCO Commonwealth Competitive Neutrality Complaints Office COAG Council of Australian Governments EPAC Economic Planning Advisory Commission GATT General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade GBE government business enterprise IAC Industries Assistance Commission IC Industry Commission ISC Inter-State Commission NCP National Competition Policy OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development ORR Office of Regulation Review PC Productivity Commission PMV passenger motor vehicle RIS Regulation Impact Statement SAA Special Advisory Authority TAA Temporary Assistance Authority TCF textiles, clothing and footwear XII FROM INDUSTRY ASSISTANCE TO PRODUCTIVITY: 30 YEARS OF ‘THE COMMISSION’ 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Introduction The Productivity Commission has played a key role in policy development and reform since its formation in 1998. But its roots go much deeper. It is the lineal descendant of the Industry Commission and, before that, the Industries Assistance Commission (IAC), which was established 30 years ago.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Australian Trade and Investment Commission Annual Report 2018–19 Australian Trade and Investment Commission Annual Report 2018–19
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018–19 Austrade at a glance WHO ARE WE? OUR STAFF We are the Australian Trade and Investment Commission—or Austrade Austrade—and we’re responsible for promoting Australian trade, staff at investment and education to the world. We help Australian 1,073 30 June 2019, businesses grow by linking them to global export opportunities; 65 per cent of whom were we attract international investment to help Australia reach its employed in client-focused economic potential; we help startups innovate and go global and operations in Australia and we promote Australia’s leading-edge education services to the overseas. Staff turnover was world to help drive growth in this sector. Our tourism policy and 11.9 per cent and the gender programs also help to build a thriving tourism industry. balance was 58 per cent female and 42 per cent male. We also help Australian citizens by providing consular and passport services in designated overseas locations. WHERE WE WORK locations at OUR MISSION 117 30 June 2019, Our mission is to promote Australian exports and international including 79 overseas locations education, strengthen Australia’s tourism sector, and attract in 48 markets, with 14 of investment into Australia. We do this by providing quality advice those locations also providing and services to exporters, education institutions and investors, consular services on behalf including generating market information and insights, promoting of the Australian Government. Australian capabilities, making connections through an extensive Within Australia, Austrade had global network of contacts, leveraging the ‘badge of government’ 10 offices, complemented by a offshore, and working collaboratively with partner organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • TIMELINES the Quarterly Newsletter of Murwillumbah Historical Society Inc
    TIMELINES The Quarterly Newsletter of Murwillumbah Historical Society Inc. ISSN 2208-1909 April 2020 & July 2020, Vol. 8 No. 4 & Vol. 9 No. 1 communities in the 1930s. These challenges were Welcome met by the efforts of the whole Tweed community Welcome to the combined April and July 2020 – and some individuals played crucial roles in editions of Timelines, the newsletter of seeing the hospital redevelopment through. Murwillumbah Historical Society. We farewell and As Paul Davey recounted in his book Politics in wish all the best to former Editor Phil Strickland the Blood: the Anthonys of Richmond, the efforts who has moved away from the district and of Hubert Anthony, the father of Doug and welcome David Taylor back to the Editor role. grandfather of Larry, were particularly significant. Hubert Anthony began driving the hospital's redevelopment even before he entered the This edition’s contents: Australian Parliament in 1937 as the Member for • It took a town - Modernising the Tweed Richmond. District Hospital By the mid-1930s, Hubert Anthony was a • The origins of Radio 2MW Murwillumbah prominent and energetic figure within • Uncovering domestic details of the Past Murwillumbah and the wider Tweed. Among other • Tweed’s WW1 Battleplane things, he chaired the board of directors of the • Vale Arthur Buchan, Wallaby 324 Tweed District Hospital in 1936-37. Anthony’s role there “enabled him to fulfill one of his most satisfying and successful contributions” to the It Took a Town - Modernising Tweed's people. the Tweed District Hospital The five-year-old Doug Anthony contracted diphtheria in 1935 during a local epidemic, and In our last edition, Maris Bruzgulis took us through the tale of was quarantined along with other children in a the redevelopment of the new Tweed District Hospital , and local reactions to the new building and its improved services.
    [Show full text]
  • Are the Current Account Imbalances on a Sustainable Path?
    Journal of Risk and Financial Management Article Are the Current Account Imbalances on a Sustainable Path? Seema Narayan * and Sivagowry Sriananthakumar School of Economics, Finance and Marketing, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 13 August 2020; Accepted: 3 September 2020; Published: 4 September 2020 Abstract: This paper examines the current accounts of 16 developed and developing countries over the period 1970 to 2018. We test whether these nations satisfy their intertemporal solvency condition for external imbalances. The solvency condition in the strong form entails: (1) a cointegration, or a long run equilibrium, relationship between exports and imports of goods and services; and (2) an increase in imports leading to a proportional increase in exports. Our findings imply that the external imbalances are a cause of vulnerability for several nations. Bangladesh satisfies the abovementioned solvency condition—in other words, its current account is sustainable in the strong form. Australia, Ecuador, Honduras, Mexico, New Zealand, and Venezuela show weak forms of sustainability. For these six nations, the presence of a cointegration relationship between exports and imports coincides with less than proportional increases in exports with increases in imports. The current accounts of Chile and Paraguay are unsustainable—while their exports and imports are cointegrated, a growth in imports leads to a more than proportional increase in exports. For a few nations that failed the full sample (1970–2018) cointegration test, we developed sub-samples by anchoring the start date at 1970 and increasing the sample by every five years from 1999 to 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Cairns Regional Council
    Submission Number: 40 Date Received: 17/02/2014 JOINT SELECT COMMITTEE ON NORTHERN AUSTRALIA This submission is made by Cairns Regional Council Cairns Regional Council 14 February 2014 P O Box 359 Cairns Qld 4870 Submission to Joint Select Committee on Northern Australia Cairns Regional Council Terms of Reference The committee is to consider policies for developing the parts of Australia north of the Tropic of Capricorn, spanning Western Australia, Northern Territory and Queensland, and in doing so: examine the potential for development of the region’s mineral, energy, agriculture, tourism, defence and other industries. provide recommendations to: o enhance trade and other investment links with the Asia-Pacific; o establish a conducive regulatory, taxation and economic environment; o address impediments to growth; and o set conditions for private investment and innovation identify critical economic and social infrastructure needed to support the long term growth of the region, and ways to support planning and investment in that infrastructure. Contents Page 1. Introduction 3 2. The Development of Northern Australia 4 3. Critical Priorities for Consideration 8 4. The Potential for Development of the Region’s Industries and Industry Priorities 12 5. Economic and Social Infrastructure 39 Appendix 1 – Summary of Priorities 47 Appendix 2 – Summary of Infrastructure Requirements 52 Acknowledgement: This submission has been prepared with the assistance and input of Cummings Economics. “Australia’s Tropical North – Initial Challenges, Historical Development, Current Progress & Future Prospects” – February 2014. P a g e | 2 of 52 Submission to Joint Select Committee on Northern Australia Cairns Regional Council 1. Introduction The Tropical North Queensland Region is one of Australia’s premier tourism destinations being located in close proximity to two of the world’s great natural wonders – The Great Barrier Reef and the World Heritage listed tropical rainforest.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Careers and Accountability in the Australian Commonwealth Government / Edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis
    AND MINISTERIAL CAREERS ACCOUNTABILITYIN THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT AND MINISTERIAL CAREERS ACCOUNTABILITYIN THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT Edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Ministerial careers and accountability in the Australian Commonwealth government / edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis. ISBN: 9781922144003 (pbk.) 9781922144010 (ebook) Series: ANZSOG series Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Politicians--Australia. Politicians--Australia--Ethical behavior. Political ethics--Australia. Politicians--Australia--Public opinion. Australia--Politics and government. Australia--Politics and government--Public opinion. Other Authors/Contributors: Dowding, Keith M. Lewis, Chris. Dewey Number: 324.220994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2012 ANU E Press Contents 1. Hiring, Firing, Roles and Responsibilities. 1 Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis 2. Ministers as Ministries and the Logic of their Collective Action . 15 John Wanna 3. Predicting Cabinet Ministers: A psychological approach ..... 35 Michael Dalvean 4. Democratic Ambivalence? Ministerial attitudes to party and parliamentary scrutiny ........................... 67 James Walter 5. Ministerial Accountability to Parliament ................ 95 Phil Larkin 6. The Pattern of Forced Exits from the Ministry ........... 115 Keith Dowding, Chris Lewis and Adam Packer 7. Ministers and Scandals .........................
    [Show full text]
  • The Lucky Country Syndrome in Australia: Resources, Social Democracy, and Regimes of Development in Historical Political Economy Perspective 1
    The Lucky Country Syndrome in Australia: Resources, Social Democracy, and Regimes of Development in Historical Political Economy Perspective 1 Christopher Lloyd School of Business, Economics and Public Policy University of New England, Australia and Nordic Centre of Excellence on the Nordic Welfare State (Nordwel) Helsinki University, Finland Email: [email protected] Paper presented to Asia Pacific Economic and Business History Conference Canberra, 16-18 February, 2012. SECOND (INCOMPLETE) DRAFT, February 2011. 1 This evolving paper, still an incomplete work-in-progress, is in the spirit (but needing additional work) of the critical realist socio-political-economy tradition of historical research into past and present of Karl Polanyi, Albert Hirschman, and Barrington Moore, a tradition that was eclipsed some decades ago by rational choice, ahistorical, political economy, but which still has much to offer. Polanyi‟s rejection of economic abstractionism and his conceptualization of the formal/substantive distinction seems to me to be essential to the study of long-run socio-economic history. Attempts to understand the present crisis of the world economy could do worse than adopt the interdisciplinary outlook of Polanyi and of Hirschman, neither of whom could ever have been pigeon-holed into a single box such as economic development theorist or political theorist or economic historian. Hirschman‟s attempts to understand the complexities of macro-social processes over time showed an exemplary skepticism about simplistic models and spurious quantification of over-aggregate variables, and a constant concern to study the local specifics of cases within a theoretical framework that rejected the abstraction of the economy from culture, society, and politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside the Canberra Press Gallery: Life in the Wedding Cake of Old
    INSIDE the CANBERRA PRESS GALLERY Life in the Wedding Cake of Old Parliament House INSIDE the CANBERRA PRESS GALLERY Life in the Wedding Cake of Old Parliament House Rob Chalmers Edited by Sam Vincent and John Wanna THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E PRESS E PRESS Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Chalmers, Rob, 1929-2011 Title: Inside the Canberra press gallery : life in the wedding cake of Old Parliament House / Rob Chalmers ; edited by Sam Vincent and John Wanna. ISBN: 9781921862366 (pbk.) 9781921862373 (ebook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Australia. Parliament--Reporters and Government and the press--Australia. Journalism--Political aspects-- Press and politics--Australia. Other Authors/Contributors: Vincent, Sam. Wanna, John. Dewey Number: 070.4493240994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Back cover image courtesy of Heide Smith Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2011 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgments . vii Foreword . ix Preface . xi 1 . Youth . 1 2 . A Journo in Sydney . 9 3 . Inside the Canberra Press Gallery . 17 4 . Menzies: The giant of Australian politics . 35 5 . Ming’s Men . 53 6 . Parliament Disgraced by its Members . 71 7 . Booze, Sex and God .
    [Show full text]
  • Earle Page and the Imagining of Australia
    ‘NOW IS THE PSYCHOLOGICAL MOMENT’ EARLE PAGE AND THE IMAGINING OF AUSTRALIA ‘NOW IS THE PSYCHOLOGICAL MOMENT’ EARLE PAGE AND THE IMAGINING OF AUSTRALIA STEPHEN WILKS Ah, but a man’s reach should exceed his grasp, Or what’s a heaven for? Robert Browning, ‘Andrea del Sarto’ The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. Edward John Phelps Earle Page as seen by L.F. Reynolds in Table Talk, 21 October 1926. Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760463670 ISBN (online): 9781760463687 WorldCat (print): 1198529303 WorldCat (online): 1198529152 DOI: 10.22459/NPM.2020 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This publication was awarded a College of Arts and Social Sciences PhD Publication Prize in 2018. The prize contributes to the cost of professional copyediting. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Cover photograph: Earle Page strikes a pose in early Canberra. Mildenhall Collection, NAA, A3560, 6053, undated. This edition © 2020 ANU Press CONTENTS Illustrations . ix Acknowledgements . xi Abbreviations . xiii Prologue: ‘How Many Germans Did You Kill, Doc?’ . xv Introduction: ‘A Dreamer of Dreams’ . 1 1 . Family, Community and Methodism: The Forging of Page’s World View . .. 17 2 . ‘We Were Determined to Use Our Opportunities to the Full’: Page’s Rise to National Prominence .
    [Show full text]
  • Did Muldoon Really 'Go Too Slowly' with CER?
    New Zealand Journal of History, 41, 2 (2007) Did Muldoon really ‘go too slowly’ with CER?1 CONVENTIONAL WISDOM HAS IT that the Australia New Zealand Closer Economic Relations Trade Agreement 1983 (CER) came into existence ‘despite’ rather than ‘because of’ Robert Muldoon, New Zealand’s Prime Minister and Minister of Finance from 1975 to 1984, who was not much interested in the arrangement.2 The perception is that Muldoon stalled the process, confounding the efforts of policy innovators who were keen for New Zealand to deregulate. Commonly, the subsequent neoliberal experiment of Rogernomics is justified in terms of Muldoon’s failure to adjust to transformed global realities. Implicit in this view is the assumption that Muldoon, the arch- regulator, could not be responsible for what is widely praised as the world’s most successful and ‘most comprehensive free trade agreement’.3 This article tests the conventional wisdom against archival sources about the negotiation of CER. It has two launching points: my previous work that argues that CER confounds any analysis of the Muldoon era as solely associated with controls and big government; and second the idea that CER is consistent with a historical pattern of long-term aspirations for trans-Tasman economic arrangements.4 The critical archival sources surrounding CER were published in a volume compiled jointly by the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade to commemorate the twentieth anniversary of CER.5 In this first historical analysis of these trans- Tasman documents, I argue that the primary evidence reveals Muldoon to have been a consistent supporter of CER negotiations and a critical participant in decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • South Australia Wine Cluster
    HARVARD UNIVERSITY The South Australian Wine Cluster Microeconomics of Competitiveness Andrew Nipe Anna York Dennis Hogan Jonathan Faull Yasser Baki 7 May 2010 Prof. Michael E. Porter, Microeconomics of Competitiveness, Harvard Business School 1 Executive Summary Australia has historically benefitted from economic growth premised on its rich natural endowments, despite its relative isolation from Old World markets. While service-related sectors have emerged as growing portions of the economy, commodities continue to comprise a disproportionate fraction of the economy relative to OECD averages. A series of economic reforms enacted between 1983-96 opened a comparatively protected economy to international competition, with significant gains to labour productivity and international trade. Despite attempts to revive structural reforms, political impasse and continued economic growth premised on endowments, have thwarted further reform. It is argued that Australia must address its consistently inflexible labour markets, declining labour productivity, comparatively low rates of innovation, and an increasing skills misalignment relative to demand to lift the country onto higher development path. South Australia is Australia’s fifth largest economy, correlated with its fifth largest population. Through the course of the twentieth century, the state’s economy transitioned from one premised on agriculture and extraction, to manufacturing. While the state remains the national breadbasket, this report argues that the state must address labour productivity rates below that of the national average, a skills misalignment, the lack of collaboration across the value chain, and the potentially devastating effects on agriculture on the part of climate change, to mitigate weaknesses and improve regional competitiveness. The South Australian wine cluster constitutes the largest producer and exporter of wines in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Deputy Prime Ministers of Australia
    Deputy Prime Ministers of Australia The official title of Deputy Prime Minister of Australia was created in 1968 and is given to the second-highest ranked member of the government. The Deputy Prime Minister is always a senior member of the Cabinet with a ministerial portfolio of their own. The Deputy Prime Minister is usually responsible for serving as Acting Prime Minister in the absence of the Prime Minister. However, this is Hon. Sir John McEwen merely convention. The Deputy Prime Minister does not automatically Deputy Prime Minister 1968 – 1971 become Prime Minister in the event the position becomes vacant – in National Library of Australia such a case, the governing party elects a new leader to become Prime Minister. On the three occasions when a serving Prime Minister has died, the unofficial Deputy Prime Minister was temporarily commissioned as Prime Minister in their own right, but none of the three – Earle Page (1939), Frank Forde (1945) or Sir John McEwen (1968) was subsequently elected to lead the government. Originally the position was an unofficial or honorary position. John Gorton was the first to formally establish the position, appointing Sir John McEwen as Deputy Prime Minister on 10 January 1968. While previous governments had had an obvious ‘second-in-command’, they were not known as Deputy Prime Minister. All Prime Ministers since Gorton have appointed an official deputy who is commissioned in that role by the Governor-General. No. Deputy Prime Minister Term of office Party Prime Minister 1. Sir John McEwen 10.01.1968 – 5.2.1971 Country Party Gorton/McMahon 2.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Australian Economy
    AN INTRODUCTION TO THE AUSTRALIAN ECONOMY by Saul Eslake Chief Economist Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd 4th edition: January 2007 (Note: this paper was originally prepared in August 2000 for Encyclopedia Americana, at the request of the editors, as ‘a general introduction to the economy of Australia’. This is an updated and slightly extended version of the original paper) Structure of Australia’s economy Australia is the world’s 17th largest economy, with output – as measured by gross domestic product (at purchasing power parity exchange rates) – in 2005 of US$630bn, approximately equivalent to that of Illinois or Florida, one-twentieth of that of the United States as a whole or a little over one-third of that of the United Kingdom. In 2005 Australia’s per capita GDP (at purchasing power parity exchange rates) of US$30,900 placed it 14th (between Finland and the Netherlands), about 75% of the figure for the United States, but slightly above that of Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom and France. Australia is often regarded as primarily a producer of agricultural commodities, minerals and energy. Historically, these products have played an enormously important role in Australia’s economic development, particularly in the first 100 or so years after European settlement began in 1788. However, their relative importance declined throughout the twentieth century. In 1900, farming, forestry and fishing accounted for 20% of Australia’s gross domestic product, and mining for a further 10%. At this time, the agricultural and mining sectors provided 95% of Australia’s exports and jobs for about 30% of Australia’s workforce.
    [Show full text]