DOCSLIB.ORG

Some Problems in Growing Sugar Beets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Some Problems in Growing Sugar Beets \i sugar crops the domestic production of sugar beets. Some Problems Beet sugar produced in the United States is in demand for food and for the chemical, pharmaceutical, fer- in Growing mentation, and heavy industries. The byproducts of the sugar beet— tops, molasses, and pulp—are used Sugar Beets chiefly as a feed for livestock. Beet molasses is also highly important in the fermentation industry, particularly for George H. Coons the production of citric acid. Beet pulp, the slices of beet from which the Sugar beets are grown for sugar in sugar has been extracted, is fed in wet 22 States—Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, or dry form to cattle. Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Nearly 670,000 acres of sugar beets Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, were harvested in 1952. On that acreage North Dakota, Colorado, Montana, 10,217,000 tons of sugar beets were Texas, New Mexico, Utah, Idaho, grown and were processed in 68 fac- Oregon, Washington, Arizona, Wy- tories. The approximately 1,532,000 oming, and California. They are tons of sugar (raw value) produced grown in New Mexico, Arizona, Utah, from "the sugar beet roots contributed Nevada, California, and Oregon for nearly 20 percent of the estimated seed. national sugar consumption of 7,900,000 Almost 20 percent of the national tons. Production in 1951 was much sugar requirem.ent is obtained from like that of 1952, 700,000 acres being 201500°—53 34 510 YEARBOOK OF AGRICULTURE 1953 harvested and about 10,500,000 tons problem were attacked qu ickly .Thanks of sugar beets being grown. In 1950, also to some earlier research, progress on 924,000 acres, 24.5 percent of the in the development of varieties resist- national sugar requirement was pro- ant to curly top was immediate. By duced. 1933, seed w^as being increased of the Disease-resistant varieties have been resistant variety that was introduced used almost exclusively to grow the in 1934 as U. S. I. Since then, U. S. i American sugar beet crop. To obtain and the other resistant sorts that fol- the seed for growing the commercial lowed in quick succession—U. S. 34, crop of sugar beets for the factories to U. S. 33, U. S. 12, and U. S. 22—have process, the industry maintains several removed from western agriculture the seed-producing enterprises. threat of crop failure from curly top. Beet sugar can only be produced in It cannot be said that curly top is factories equipped to carry on the vanquished. Severe exposure in the complicated chemical processes nec- worst years still takes its toll. But essary to extract and purify the sugar farmers may now plant the new varie- that is stored in the roots. Usually the ties with confidence that the crop will beets are grown within a radius of 40 be carried through to a reasonably to 60 miles of the factory. A highly high yield despite disease. intensified culture on the best lands Meanwhile the producers farther nearby is the result; on the farms east w^ere being plagued by sporadic themselves, sugar beets are usually the epidemics of leaf spot. Leaf spot, main cash crop, and farmers have been caused by the fungus Cercospora beticola, tempted to grow beets on the same blights the tops so that root growth is fields repeatedly rather than to make dwarfed and the percentage of sucrose them part of a rotation system. Twin is cut. Its efi'ccts are less dramatic than problems of diseases and low^ered fer- those of curly top, but it occurs more tility consequently have arisen; indeed, widely and is more damaging to the the history of the industry as it moved industry. from the Eastern States westward, Leaf spot is a wasting disease. It can and then sought in place after place reduce tonnage and sucrose enough to for suitable production areas, reflects make the beet crop unprofitable to the damage done by curly top, leaf farmer and factory. The blight years spot, and root diseases. are those in which rainy periods are Curly top by 1926 had caused re- frequent in the early half of the season peated failures of the sugar beet crop and total rainfall is abundant—the in States west of the Rocky Moun- very conditions that should give a tains. In years of outbreak, the average bumper crop bring only disappoint- acre yields from some districts dropped ment as wave after wave of leaf blight- from an expected 15 tons to 5 tons or ing occurs. In epidemic years, leaf less. The history of sugar beet culture spot may kill back the entire foliage in the Truckee project of Nevada, bouquet several times in a season. Salt River project of Arizona, Delta New growth is pushed out only to be and other areas in Utah, the San blighted in 2 or 3 weeks. Replacement Joaquin Valley of California, the of blighted leaves is at the expense of Yakima Valley of Washington, and root growth and stored sugar, hence many others is all much the same—a the crop is lacking in weight and qual- brief period of fine prospects and then ity. Between 1915 and 1930, blight crop failure because of curly top, with years were frequent. Factories in the ultimate abandonment of sugar beets Midwest and in the more eastern by farmers. districts were in financial distress. Congress in 1929 appropriated funds The first leaf spot resistant variety, for investigations of curly top and the U. S. 217, was introduced in 1938 by beet leafhopper. All aspects of the the Department of Agriculture. Its SOME PROBLEMS IN GROWING SUGAR BEETS 511 average production of sugar was 5 planting of 25 percent of the acreage percent more an acre than that of the around a factory has been necessary. susceptible European varieties. It was The sugar beet cannot attain stable soon replaced by U. S. 200 x 215, a production and full mechanization is hybrid variety that served the industry not possible until disease-safe varieties from 1940 to 1944. It gave higher root are available. U. S. 216—a leaf spot yields than.U. S. 217 and was at least resistant inbred—was also found to be 8 to 10 percent superior to European outstanding in its resistance to black varieties if leaf spot was prevalent. root. The superimposing of resistance U. S. 215 X 216 was introduced in to black root upon resistance to leaf spot 1945. It became the leader in the seems entirely feasible in varieties built humid area. Without leaf spot, it is as around U. S. 216 and its close rela- productive as the nonresistant Euro- tives. A number of selections resistant pean types; if leaf spot is serious, it is to black root have been made from at least 15 percent superior in pro- varieties resistant to leaf spot. Varieties duction of sugar. that wxre ready for introduction in Still another disease contributed 1953 combine resistance to leaf spot earlier to the general instability of our with moderate resistance to black beet sugar industry—the seedling and root. They are equal to nonresistant root disease complex that farmers call strains when disease is absent and black root. It occurs all over the superior when leaf spot and some black United States but is worse in the root occur. Plant breeders hope they humid area. The primary cause of will solve the problem of black root. black root of seedling beets is the water mold, Apkanomyces cochlioides. WEATHER CONDITIONS sometimes pro- Other damping-ofif organisms are duce efi'ects on sugar beets that re- associated in the seedling disease com- semble symptoms of disease. Hot, dry plex but are less important or more winds may cause scorching of the edges readily controlled. Black root may of leaves. Such leaf scorch should not kill so many of the seedlings that the be confused with blighting by fungus. stands after thinning are below or on Sugar beets are relatively hardy, but the border line of profitable produc- early frosts may injure the emerging tion. If rainfall in spring is slightly plants. Such an injury may be dis- above normal or if the soil is infested tinguished readily from damping-oíF with dam.ping-oíT organisms, the ini- of seedlings. tial stands of seedlings are so reduced Heavy fall frosts kill the upper leaves, by fungi that only gappy stands can which become black and water-soaked be left after thinning. and then dry out and turn white. Heavy planting rates were used Growers recognize this condition, even formerly in an attempt to have extra though they might not understand large numbers of seedlings from which the effects of severe freezes and the a fair stand of thinned beets could be reduction in sucrose of the roots that saved. In recent years, to save man- may follow. Low temperatures in late power in singling sugar beets, seeding October or November may kill all rates have been reduced. Destruction leaves. If warmer vveather follows, the of the meager initial stands by black killed foliage is replaced l^y a nev/ root thus causes even greater damage growth at the expense of the food than before. According to factory reserves in the root, thus lowering the records, parts of Michigan and Ohio sucrose percentage. Often a farmer is often have had average stands in their puzzled by sugar tests after a freeze fields considerably below 70 percent— that show a much lower sugar content much too low for profitable growing than the earlier tests. Wherever feasi- of the crop. ble, after tops are severely frozen the In seasons of severe black root, re- harvest should be delayed to permit 512 YEARBOOK OF AGRICULTURE 1953 the foliage to be replaced and the plant When the soil is low in boron, the again to store sugar in the roots.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Industrial Hemp for Flower Production a Guide to Basic Production Techniques Hemp Is a Non-Psychoactive Variety of Cannabis Sativa L
    Industrial Hemp for Flower Production A Guide to Basic Production Techniques Hemp is a non-psychoactive variety of Cannabis sativa L. The crop is one of historical importance in the U.S. and re-emerging worldwide importance as manufacturers seek hemp as a renewable and sustainable resource for a wide variety of consumer and industrial products. Hemp can be grown for flower, fiber, and/or grain. For years, U.S. entrepreneurs have been importing hemp from China, Eastern Europe and Canada to manufacture travel gear, apparel and accessories, body care and cosmetics, foods like bread, beer, and salad oils, paper products, building materials and animal bedding, textiles, auto parts, housewares, and sporting equipment. Industrial hemp is poised to be a “new” cash crop and market opportunity for Vermont farms that is versatile and suitable as a rotation crop with other specialty crops, small grains, and grasses. Hemp grown for all types of end-use contains less than 0.3% tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Hemp varieties intended to produce a health supplement contain relatively high concentrations of a compound called cannabidiol (CBD), potentially 10-15%. Cannabidiol is just one of over 100 cannabinoids found in hemp. Cannabidiol has purported benefits such as relief from inflammation, pain, anxiety, seizures, spasms, and other conditions. In addition to the vast number of cannabinoids, plants are known to produce over 400 other secondary compounds including terpenes, which have other purported health benefits and contribute to plant aromatics. The CBD is most concentrated in the female flower buds of the plant; however, it is also in the leaves and other plant parts as well.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Oats Industry (AER-573)
    C. in îtates U-- '^— ^ nentof >^^ Agriculture The U.S. Economic Research Service Oats Industry Agricultural EcofKmriic Report Linwood A. Hoffman Number 573 Janet Livezey Additional copies of this report... can be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Ask for The U.S. Oats Industry (AER-573). Write to the above address for price and ordering instructioas. For faster service, call the GPO order desk at 202-783-3238 and charge your purchase to your Visa, MasterCard, Choice, or GPO Deposit Account. A 25-percent bulk discount is available on orders of 100 or more copies shipped to a single address. Please add 25 percent extra for postage for shipments to foreign addresses. Microfiche copies (Í6.50 for each report plus Í3 for processing) can be purchased from the order desk. National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. Enclose check or money order, payable to NTIS. For faster service, call NTIS at 703-487-4650 and charge your purchase to your Visa, MasterCard, American Express, or NTIS Deposit Account. NTIS will ship rush orders within 24 hours for an extra Í10; charge your rush order by calling 800-336-4700. The Economic Research Service has no copies for free mailing. The U.S. OATS INDUSTRY, by Linwood A. Hoffman and Janet Livezey. Commodity Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Economic Report No. 573. ABSTRACT U.S. farmers produced about 16 percent of the total world oats production during 1980-85, down from more than 29 percent during 1960-64 when the United States was the largest producer.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin No. 205-The Beet Leafhopper in Utah: a Study of Its Distribution and the Occurrence of Curly-Top
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU UAES Bulletins Agricultural Experiment Station 6-1928 Bulletin No. 205 - The Beet Leafhopper in Utah: A Study of Its Distribution and the Occurrence of Curly-top George F. Knowlton Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/uaes_bulletins Part of the Agricultural Science Commons Recommended Citation Knowlton, George F., "Bulletin No. 205 - The Beet Leafhopper in Utah: A Study of Its Distribution and the Occurrence of Curly-top" (1928). UAES Bulletins. Paper 176. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/uaes_bulletins/176 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Agricultural Experiment Station at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in UAES Bulletins by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. B LLETIN 205 JUNE, 192 The Beet Leafhopper In Utah A Study of Its Distribution and the Occurrence of Curly-top By EORGE F. KNOWLTON The d:uk form of the beet leafhopper , " I Eu,tettix t en ell'LIS ( Baker) (x30) U TAH AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION L OGAN, UTAH UTAH AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION BOARD OF TRUSTE ES ANTHONY W . IVINS, President ................................... , ................ Salt Lake City C. G. ADNEY, Vice·President ........................................... ~ ........................... Corin ne ROY BULLEN ........................................................................................ Salt Lake City LORE NZO N . STOHL __ __ __ __________ __ ____ __ __ ____ ____ __ __ __ __ ______ __ __ __ __ ________________ Salt Lake City MRS. L EE CHAR LES MILLER ____ ____ __ __ ______ __ __ __ __ ____ __ ______ ________________ Salt Lake City WESTON VE R NON, Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Leafhoppers, Thrips
    Small Fruits & Vegetables IPM Advisory Weekly Pest and Production Update, Utah State University Extension, June 25, 2010 Insect/Disease Information VEGETABLES curly top on bean Beet Leafhopper and Curly Top Virus curly top on tomato Howard Schwartz, CSU, bugwood.org CSU, Schwartz, Howard per migrates to irrigated gardens and rangeland. A leafhopper can spread the virus from one plant to the next in 4 hours. A leafhopper can vector the virus for the duration of its life, but it does not pass on the virus to its progeny. curly top on squash Symptoms vary according to the host plant, but in general, newly infected plants show inward or downward rolling of margins on the youngest leaves that is often associated with chlorosis, and plant drooping. Later, leaf curling and distor- tion increases, veins swell, and wart-like bumps appear on the undersides of leaves. Leaves are dark, thick, and brittle. The plant is stunted and eventually may die. This disease is most often seen on tomatoes in Utah. Infected tomatoes will have chlorotic leaves with purple veins, and the plant will appear silvery in color. The leaves thicken and Oregon State University Extension State University Oregon become leathery and brittle, and the blossoms may drop, pre- venting fruit set. Fruits that are already formed turn yellowish The beet leafhopper carries the virus, curly top, which can af- red, and ripen prematurely to a poor quality, stunted fruit. fect many vegetables, including beets, beans, tomatoes, spinach, and melons. The leafhopper is an important pest only due to Distribution of the disease from season to season varies, and the fact that it vectors the virus; feeding alone does not cause depends on when leafhoppers leave overwintering sites in severe damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Leafhoppers1
    Insects/Mites that Feed on Hemp – Fluid Feeders Leafhoppers1 Leafhoppers are small insects (1/8-1/6 inch) that have an elongate body. The adults, which are winged, readily jump and fly from plants when disturbed. Immature stages (nymphs) are wingless but can quite actively crawl on plants. The leafhoppers associated with hemp are poorly studied at present but adults of about a half dozen species have been collected in sweep net samples. Most regularly found is Ceratagallia uhleri, which is one of the few leafhoppers found on hemp that can also reproduce on the plant (Fig 1,2). No visible plant injury has ever been observed by this leafhopper. Another leafhopper, a small light green species tentatively identified in the genus Empoasca, also reproduces on the crop. (Fig. 3, 4). Other leafhoppers are less frequently collected (Fig. 5-7). Sampling of hemp has resulted in recovery of only adult stages of Figures 1, 2. Adult (top) and nymph (bottom) of most of these. Most leafhoppers observed Ceratagallia uhleri, the most common leafhopper on hemp leaves appear to be transient found in hemp in eastern Colorado and a species species on the crop, which develop on that can reproduce on the crop. No plant injury has other off-field plants. These transients been observed by this insect. may feed briefly on the plants, or may not feed at all on hemp. Leafhoppers feed on leaves and stems with piercing sucking mouthparts that extract a bit of fluid from the plant. Most feed on fluids moving through the phloem of plants, resulting in insignificant effects on plant growth and no visible symptoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Palm Oil - Economics of the Driver of Global Vegetable Oil Markets
    Palm Oil - Economics of the driver of global vegetable oil markets Dessy Anggraeni, Yelto Zimmer Thünen-Institut of Farm Economics Pageagri 0 benchmark Dessy Global Anggraeni Forum , Yelto Zimmer st Des Moines, 21Palm August Oil – 2014 Economics of the driver of global vegetable oil markets Why this study? (1) Demand for vegetable oil is growing fast (2) Many people wonder about palm oil (3) Therefore we wonder about: a) How are markets connected? b) How competitive is palm oil compared to soybean oil? c) What are the main drivers? Page 1 Dessy Anggraeni, Yelto Zimmer Palm Oil – Economics of the driver of global vegetable oil markets Contents Part 1. Overview of global vegetable oil market Part 2. Palm oil production system Part 3. Economics of palm and soybean oil production Page 2 Dessy Anggraeni, Yelto Zimmer Palm Oil – Economics of the driver of global vegetable oil markets 1. Overview of global vegetable oil markets Vorname Nachname Thünen-Institut für XXX PageOrt 3 Dessy Anggraeni, Yelto Zimmer Datum Palm Oil – Economics of the driver of global vegetable oil markets Breakdown of vegetable oil production (2002 vs. 2012) 2002 2012 Palm Oil Other Oil Other Oil Palm Oil 27% 30% 27% 32% Rapeseed Rapeseed Soybean Oil Oil Soybean Oil 15% 13% Oil 30% 26% Palm oil in a fast growing market outperforms all other vegetable oils Source: FAOSTAT Page 4 Dessy Anggraeni, Yelto Zimmer Palm Oil – Economics of the driver of global vegetable oil markets Main palm oil exporters (2008 – 2012) 45.000 40.000 35.000 30.000 25.000 20.000 in 1000 tons tons
    [Show full text]
  • SB661 a Glossary of Agriculture, Environment, and Sustainable
    This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu. A Glossary of Agriculture, Environment, and Sustainable Development Bulletin 661 Agricultural Experiment Station, Kansas State University Marc Johnson, Director This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu. A GLOSSARY OF AGRICULTURE, ENVIRONMENT, AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT1 R. Scott Frey2 ABSTRACT This glossary contains general definitions of over 500 terms related to agricultural production, the environment, and sustainable develop- ment. Terms were chosen to increase awareness of major issues for the nonspecialist and were drawn from various social and natural science disciplines, including ecology, biology, epidemiology, chemistry, sociol- ogy, economics, anthropology, philosophy, and public health. 1 Contribution 96-262-B from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station. 2 Professor of Sociology, Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-4003. 1 This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu. PREFACE Agricultural production has increased dramatically in the United States and elsewhere in the past 50 years as agricultural practices have evolved. But this success has been costly: water pollution, soil depletion, and a host of human (and nonhuman) health and safety problems have emerged as impor- tant side effects associated with modern agricultural practices. Because of increased concern with these costs, an alternative view of agricultural production has arisen that has come to be known as sustain- able agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leafhopper Vectors of Phytopathogenic Viruses (Homoptera, Cicadellidae) Taxonomy, Biology, and Virus Transmission
    /«' THE LEAFHOPPER VECTORS OF PHYTOPATHOGENIC VIRUSES (HOMOPTERA, CICADELLIDAE) TAXONOMY, BIOLOGY, AND VIRUS TRANSMISSION Technical Bulletin No. 1382 Agricultural Research Service UMTED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many individuals gave valuable assistance in the preparation of this work, for which I am deeply grateful. I am especially indebted to Miss Julianne Rolfe for dissecting and preparing numerous specimens for study and for recording data from the literature on the subject matter. Sincere appreciation is expressed to James P. Kramer, U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C., for providing the bulk of material for study, for allowing access to type speci- mens, and for many helpful suggestions. I am also grateful to William J. Knight, British Museum (Natural History), London, for loan of valuable specimens, for comparing type material, and for giving much useful information regarding the taxonomy of many important species. I am also grateful to the following persons who allowed me to examine and study type specimens: René Beique, Laval Univer- sity, Ste. Foy, Quebec; George W. Byers, University of Kansas, Lawrence; Dwight M. DeLong and Paul H. Freytag, Ohio State University, Columbus; Jean L. LaiFoon, Iowa State University, Ames; and S. L. Tuxen, Universitetets Zoologiske Museum, Co- penhagen, Denmark. To the following individuals who provided additional valuable material for study, I give my sincere thanks: E. W. Anthon, Tree Fruit Experiment Station, Wenatchee, Wash.; L. M. Black, Uni- versity of Illinois, Urbana; W. E. China, British Museum (Natu- ral History), London; L. N. Chiykowski, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa ; G. H. L. Dicker, East Mailing Research Sta- tion, Kent, England; J.
    [Show full text]
  • SUGARBEET S P R I N G I S S UE
    THE SUGARBEET S P R I N G ISS UE SPRING 2011 SUGARBEET N EWS LETTER he Sugarbeet is published by The Amalgamated Sugar Company. The magazine is prepared by the Agriculture TDepartment to provide growers with up-to-date information on growing and harvesting sugarbeets. The magazine is also published to help upgrade the standards of the U.S. beet industry by providing a reliable source of information for agronomists, scientists, sugar company personnel, students, and others interested in this vital food crop. Articles appearing in The Sugarbeet, with the exception of those items credited to other sources, may be quoted or reprinted without permission; however, mention of this publication is requested when material herein is re- printed. Although every effort is made to ensure that the material is accurate, no responsibility can be assumed for er- rors over which the editor has no control. Mention or illustration of methods, devices, equipment, or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement by the company. Address all communication to the Editor, The Sugarbeet, P.O. Box 8787, Nampa, ID 83653-8787. Agriculture Offices Nyssa District Nyssa, Oregon Mini-Cassia District Paul, Idaho Agriculture Research Offices Twin Falls, Idaho Twin Falls District Twin Falls, Idaho Technical Advisor John Schorr Elwyhee District Corporate Director of Agriculture Mountain Home, Idaho Editor Nampa District Dennis Searle Nampa, Idaho Ag Services Manager SPRING ISSUE 2011 CONTENTS Mini-Cassia District - 2010 ........................................... 2 Nampa District - 2010 .............................................. 4 Twin Falls District - 2010 ............................................ 5 Elwyhee District - 2010 ............................................. 6 Washington District - 2010 .......................................... 6 Nyssa District - 2010 ............................................... 7 Controlling Severe Curly Top In Sugarbeet ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Hemp Pests Presentation Lukas
    Hemp Production Considerations -Insects and Diseases- Scott Lukas Assistant Professor Hermiston Agricultural Research & Extension Center What is hemp vs. marijuana? Cannabis sativa Hemp Marijuana ≤ 0.3% Total THC* > 0.3% Total THC* * The first American flag made by Betsy Ross was made from industrial hemp 1777 Where are we with hemp 2019 Oregon production • 63,000 registered acres in 2019, nearly six times more than in 2018 • 1,940 registered growers in the state • Most all of the crop is being grown for hemp essential oils with dependence on feminized seeds for production Expansive production and limited research, we are all learning at the same time. 1. Overview of insect pests that prey on or potentially may affect hemp 2. Diseases observed in 2019 hemp crops I will provide some management options but cannot list products or specific control options Products are under development and approval Research to support insect and disease control is underway Insects associated with hemp Group I: Below soil Group II: Leaf Group III: Stem/stalk Group IV: Flowers and seeds Wireworm Pacific coast wireworm Limonius canus Click beetle larvae Determine levels Bait stations Soil collection – sieve Soil inspection during tillage Will weaken or kill plants from damage or secondary infection Wireworm Pacific coast wireworm Life Cycle Move upward in soil in spring - Overwinter at 12”-24” depth Wireworm Group II – Leaf feeders Sucking and piercing Chewing (Leaf defoliators) Sucking & Piercing Leafhoppers Spider Mites Aphids Thrips Russet Mites CSU-W Cranshaw
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Host Preference on Transmission of Curly Top Virus to Tomato by the Beet Leafhopper P
    Vector Relations Effect of Host Preference on Transmission of Curly Top Virus to Tomato by the Beet Leafhopper P. E. Thomas and R. K. Boll Plant Pathologist and Agriculture Research Technician, respectively, Agriculture Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, WA 99350. Cooperative investigations of the Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Western Region, and the Washington State University College Agricultural Research Center, Pullman, WA 99164. Scientific Paper No. 4223, Washington Agricultural Experiment Station. Accepted for publication 11 January 1977. ABSTRACT THOMAS, P. E., and R. K. BOLL. 1977. Effect of host preference on transmission of curly top virus to tomato by the beet leafhopper. Phytopathology 67: 903-905. During the Ist hr after viruliferous beet leafhoppers were appeared to reflect changes in feeding behavior and health of confined on seedlings of a preferred host, sugar beet, and a the vector when confined on the two species. Leafhoppers nonpreferred host, tomato, an equal percentage of plants of confined on tomato began dying after 12-16 hr, and few were the two species became infected. During the next 3 hr, still alive after 72 hr. Leafhoppers fed only 3% sucrose percentage transmission to tomato was twice as great as to solution lived for up to 2 wk. Leafhoppers fed only water died sugar beet. Thereafter, transmission to sugar beet continued at about the same rate as those on mature tomato. steadily, but transmission to tomato dropped off and nearly Leafhoppers held 8 hr on tomato and 16 hr on sugar beet stopped 8 hr after confinement.
    [Show full text]
  • Pastures and Cash Crops: Biomass Flows in the Socio-Metabolic Transition of Twentieth-Century Colombian Agriculture
    sustainability Article Pastures and Cash Crops: Biomass Flows in the Socio-Metabolic Transition of Twentieth-Century Colombian Agriculture Alexander Urrego-Mesa 1,* , Juan Infante-Amate 2 and Enric Tello 1 1 Department of Economic History, Institutions, Policy and World Economy, University of Barcelona, 08034Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] 2 Agro-ecosystems History Laboratory, Pablo de Olavide University, 41013Sevilla, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-934021931 Received: 13 November 2018; Accepted: 20 December 2018; Published: 26 December 2018 Abstract: This article aims to situate a national case study of the global periphery at the core of the debate on the socio-ecological transition by drawing on new data of biomass flows in twentieth-century Colombia. We draw up a century-long annual series converting a wide set of indicators from Net Primary Production (NPP) into the final socioeconomic uses of biomass, distinguishing around 200 different categories of crops, forests, and pastures. Our calculations draw on FAOSTAT and several corpuses of national statistics. The results show a fall of 10% in total NPP related to land-use changes involving forest conversion. Throughout the twentieth century, pasture was the most relevant among domestic extraction. Allocations of cash crops to industrial processing rose while the figure for staple crops for primary food consumption stagnated. The critical role of cattle throughout all periods and the higher yields of the industrial cash crops are behind this profile. This might also mean the start of a new trend of using pasture land for more profitable export crops, which establishes a new inner frontier of land-use intensification.
    [Show full text]