DOCSLIB.ORG

Phylogenetic Classifications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phylogenetic Classifications C.A.Bessy C. A. Bessey (1845-1915) was an American botanist, who laid the foundations of modern phylogenetic classifications. He was a student of Asa Gray and later became Professor of botany at the University of Nebraska. He was the first American to make a major contribution to plant classification, and also the first botanist to develop intentional phylogenetic classification. He based his classification on Bentham and Hooker, modified in the light of his 28 dicta and published in Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. under the title‘The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants’ (1915). Bessey considered angiosperms to have evolved monophyletically from Cycadophyta belonging to implied bennettitalean ancestry. He was the pioneer to consider that the large-sized bisexual flowers of Magnoliaceae with spirally arranged floral parts represent the most primitive conditionin angiosperms, a theory followed by many subsequent authors. Bessey believed in the strobiloid theory of the origin of the flower, the latter having originated from a vegetative shoot with spiral phyllomes, of which some modified to form sterile perianth, fertile stamens and carpels. Two evolutionary lines from such a flower formed strobiloideae (Ranalian line) with connation of like parts and cotyloideae (Rosalian line) with connation of unlike parts. Ranales in dicots and Alismatales in monocots were considered to be the most primitive in each group, a fact recognized by most subsequent authors. Ranalian plants were considered to be primitive angiosperms having given rise to monocots, but unfortunately monocots were placed before dicots. Bessey also initiated the representation of evolutionary relationships through an evolutionary diagram, a phylogram with primitive groups at the base and the most advanced at the tips of branches. His diagram, resembling a cactus plant is better known as Besseyan cactus. John Hutchinson-- Phylogenetic John Hutchinson (1884-1972) was a British botanist associated with the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, England who also served as keeper of Kew herbarium for many years. Hutchinson first proposed his classification of angiosperms in his book The Families of Flowering Plants, the first volume on Dicotyledons appearing in 1926 and the second on Monocotyledons in 1934. The classification was revised periodically, second edition in 1959 and the 3rd in 1973, one year after his demise. Hutchinson also embarked upon an ambitious plan of revising Genera plantarum of Bentham and Hooker under the title The Genera of Flowering Plants. Unfortunately he could complete only 2 volumes of this work, published in 1964 and 1967, the project cut short by his demise. The classification system of Hutchinson dealt only with the flowering plants, included under Phylum Angiospermae as distinct from Phylum Gymnospermae. The classification was based on 24 principles including General principles, Relating to General Habit, Relating to General Structure of Flowering plants and those Relating to Flowers and Fruits. Some of the principles are outlined below: 1. Evolution is both upwards (sympetaly,epigyny) and downwards (apetaly,unisexuality). 2. Evolution does not necessarily involve all the organs of a plant at the same time; and one organ or set of organs may be advancing while the other may be stationary or retrograding. 3. Evolution has generally been consistent and when a particular progression or retrogression has set in, it is persisted into the end of the phylum. 4. In certain groups, trees and shrubs are probably more primitive than herbs. 5. Perennials are older than biennials, and from them annuals have been derived. 6. As a rule, simple leaves precede compound leaves. 7. Bisexual flowers precede unisexual flowers, and the dioecious is probably more recent than the monoecious condition. 8. Solitary flower is more primitive than the inflorescence. Following Bessey, Hutchinson considered flowering plants to be monophyletic, having evolved from the hypothetical cycadeoid ancestral group which he gave the name of Proangiosperms. He recognized a number of smaller groups, bound together by a combination of characters. He established Magnoliales as an order distinct from Ranales, as he considered them to have evolved on parallel lines. Hutchinson regarded Magnoliaceae as the most primitive family of the living angiosperms. He considered Dicotyledones to be more primitive and placed them before Monocotyledones, giving them a rank of Subphylum. Whereas Hutchinson considered the woody habit to be primitive in dicots, in monocots he considered the herbaceous habit to be primitive, and the woody forms derived from the herbaceous forms. He also considered Monocotyledones also to be a monophyletic group derived from Ranales, Butomales having a link with Helleboraceae and Alismatales with Ranunculaceae. Merits The system of Hutchinson, being based on a number of sound phylogenetic principles, and studies of a large number of plants at his disposal at Kew, shows the following improvements over earlier systems: 1. The system is more phylogenetic than that of Engler and Prantl, as it is based on phylogenetic principles, generally recognized by most authors. 2. The treatment of Magnoliales as the starting point in the evolutionary series of Dicotyledones is in agreement with prevalent views 3. Many large unnatural families have been split into smaller natural ones.Euphorbiaceae of Bentham and Hooker is split into Euphorbiaceae, Ricinaceae and Buxaceae. The family Urticaceae is similarly split into Urticaceae, Moraceae, Ulmaceae and Cannabinaceae. 4. Standards of description are very high.Useful keys are provided for the identification of families. 5. Phylograms for dicots and monocots are more superior to the Besseyan cactus. 6. The classification of Monocotyledones is sounder and generally appreciated, even keys to the identification of genera have been provided. 7. The derivation of Monocotyledones from Dicotyledones is widely agreed. Demerits The classification of Hutchinson has largely been ignored, as it mostly did not proceed beyond family level, and gave much importance to the habit. The major drawbacks of the system are listed below: 1. The system is not useful for practical identification, arrangement in Floras and herbaria, as it does not proceed beyond the family level in the greater majority of taxa. 2. Hutchinson did not provide a full explanation for the majority of his evolutionary concepts. 3. He derives angiosperms from proangiosperms, but does not provide information about the nature of this hypothetical ancestral group. 4. The family Calycanthaceae is related to Laurales, but placed here in Rosales. 5. Hutchinson regards Magnoliaceae as the most primitive family of living Dicotyledones, but most contemporary authors consider vessel-less Winteraceae, or paleoherbs be the most primitive. 6. The monocotyledons are placed after dicotyledons, whereas the recent classifications place them between primitive angiosperms and the eudicots. 7. Family Liliaceae of Hutchinson is a large unnatural assemblage, which has been split into several smaller monophyleticfamilies like Liliaceae, Alliaceae, Asparagaceae, Asphodelaceae in the recent classification of Judd et al.(2002), APG II (2003) and Thorne (2003). Arthur Cronquist Arthur Cronquist (1919-1992), a leading American taxonomist, associated with the New York Botanical Garden produced a broad classification of Embryobionta along with Takhtajan and Zimmerman (1966). He produced a detailed classification of angiosperms in 1968 in his book The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants. The classification was further elaborated in 1981 in his book An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. The final revision was published in the second edition (1988) of The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants. Some realignment in Dicotyledons was published in Nordic Journal of Botany in 1983. Cronquist gave more importance to morphology Following Takhtajan, the angiosperms are given the name Magnoliophyta and divided into Magnoliopsida (dicots) and Liliopsida (monocots). Cronquist includes only six subclasses in dicots and recognizes five in monocots. In dicotyledons, the Ranunculidae of Takhtajan are merged with Magnoliidae and Lamiidae are not given a separate rank at subclass level, but retained in Asteridae. Cronquist recognizes 83 orders and 386 families. Cronquist agrees with Thorne (earlier versions up to 1992) in keeping the family Winteraceae (and not Degeneriaceae as done by Takhtajan) at the beginning of dicotyledons, and included alongwith Degeneriaceae, Magnoliaceae, Annonaceae etc. in the same order Magnoliales. The relationships of various subclasses and orders are shown with the help of a phylogram which takes the form of a bubble diagram, like other contemporary systems of classification. Merits 1. The revision of the classification in 1981 and 1988 was presented a in comprehensive form, giving detailed information on phytochemistry, anatomy, ultrastructure and chromosomes besides morphology. 2. The text, being in English, has been readily adopted in books and floristic projects originating in the USA. 3. The system is highly phylogenetic and is based on now largely accepted phylogenetic principles. 4. The placement of Winteraceae at the beginning of dicotyledons is generally favoured by most authors including Ehrendorfer (1968), Gottsberger (1974) and Thorne (up to 1992). 5.Abolition of artificial group names such as Polypetalae, Gamopetalae, Lignosae, Herbaceae etc. has resulted in more
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Buxus Sempervirens1
    Fact Sheet FPS-80 October, 1999 Buxus sempervirens1 Edward F. Gilman2 Introduction Long a tradition in colonial landscapes, Boxwood is a fine- textured plant familiar to most gardeners and non-gardeners alike (Fig. 1). Eventually reaching 6- to 8-feet-tall (old specimens cab be much taller), Boxwood grows slowly into a billowing mound of soft foliage. Flowers are borne in the leaf axils and are barely noticeable to the eye, but they have a distinctive aroma that irritates some people. General Information Scientific name: Buxus sempervirens Pronunciation: BUCK-sus sem-pur-VYE-renz Common name(s): Common Boxwood, Common Box, American Boxwood Family: Buxaceae Plant type: shrub USDA hardiness zones: 6 through 8 (Fig. 2) Planting month for zone 7: year round Planting month for zone 8: year round Origin: not native to North America Figure 1. Common Boxwood. Uses: border; edging; foundation; superior hedge Availablity: generally available in many areas within its Growth rate: slow hardiness range Texture: fine Description Foliage Height: 8 to 20 feet Spread: 10 to 15 feet Leaf arrangement: opposite/subopposite Plant habit: round Leaf type: simple Plant density: dense Leaf margin: entire 1.This document is Fact Sheet FPS-80, one of a series of the Environmental Horticulture Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Publication date: October, 1999 Please visit the EDIS Web site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. 2.Edward F. Gilman, professor, Environmental Horticulture Department, Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32611. The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function without regard to race, color, sex, age, handicap, or national origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Full of Beans: a Study on the Alignment of Two Flowering Plants Classification Systems
    Full of beans: a study on the alignment of two flowering plants classification systems Yi-Yun Cheng and Bertram Ludäscher School of Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA {yiyunyc2,ludaesch}@illinois.edu Abstract. Advancements in technologies such as DNA analysis have given rise to new ways in organizing organisms in biodiversity classification systems. In this paper, we examine the feasibility of aligning two classification systems for flowering plants using a logic-based, Region Connection Calculus (RCC-5) ap- proach. The older “Cronquist system” (1981) classifies plants using their mor- phological features, while the more recent Angiosperm Phylogeny Group IV (APG IV) (2016) system classifies based on many new methods including ge- nome-level analysis. In our approach, we align pairwise concepts X and Y from two taxonomies using five basic set relations: congruence (X=Y), inclusion (X>Y), inverse inclusion (X<Y), overlap (X><Y), and disjointness (X!Y). With some of the RCC-5 relationships among the Fabaceae family (beans family) and the Sapindaceae family (maple family) uncertain, we anticipate that the merging of the two classification systems will lead to numerous merged solutions, so- called possible worlds. Our research demonstrates how logic-based alignment with ambiguities can lead to multiple merged solutions, which would not have been feasible when aligning taxonomies, classifications, or other knowledge or- ganization systems (KOS) manually. We believe that this work can introduce a novel approach for aligning KOS, where merged possible worlds can serve as a minimum viable product for engaging domain experts in the loop. Keywords: taxonomy alignment, KOS alignment, interoperability 1 Introduction With the advent of large-scale technologies and datasets, it has become increasingly difficult to organize information using a stable unitary classification scheme over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Reconstruction Prompts Taxonomic Changes in Sauropus, Synostemon and Breynia (Phyllanthaceae Tribe Phyllantheae)
    Blumea 59, 2014: 77–94 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/blumea RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651914X684484 Phylogenetic reconstruction prompts taxonomic changes in Sauropus, Synostemon and Breynia (Phyllanthaceae tribe Phyllantheae) P.C. van Welzen1,2, K. Pruesapan3, I.R.H. Telford4, H.-J. Esser 5, J.J. Bruhl4 Key words Abstract Previous molecular phylogenetic studies indicated expansion of Breynia with inclusion of Sauropus s.str. (excluding Synostemon). The present study adds qualitative and quantitative morphological characters to molecular Breynia data to find more resolution and/or higher support for the subgroups within Breynia s.lat. However, the results show molecular phylogeny that combined molecular and morphological characters provide limited synergy. Morphology confirms and makes the morphology infrageneric groups recognisable within Breynia s.lat. The status of the Sauropus androgynus complex is discussed. Phyllanthaceae Nomenclatural changes of Sauropus species to Breynia are formalised. The genus Synostemon is reinstated. Sauropus Synostemon Published on 1 September 2014 INTRODUCTION Sauropus in the strict sense (excluding Synostemon; Pruesapan et al. 2008, 2012) and Breynia are two closely related tropical A phylogenetic analysis of tribe Phyllantheae (Phyllanthaceae) Asian-Australian genera with up to 52 and 35 species, respec- using DNA sequence data by Kathriarachchi et al. (2006) pro- tively (Webster 1994, Govaerts et al. 2000a, b, Radcliffe-Smith vided a backbone phylogeny for Phyllanthus L. and related 2001). Sauropus comprises mainly herbs and shrubs, whereas genera. Their study recommended subsuming Breynia L. (in- species of Breynia are always shrubs. Both genera share bifid cluding Sauropus Blume), Glochidion J.R.Forst. & G.Forst., or emarginate styles, non-apiculate anthers, smooth seeds and and Synostemon F.Muell.
    [Show full text]
  • Reminder Arthur Cronquist Dies PROGRAMS the Jekyll and Hyde Of
    May - Julie 1992 Vol. 2, No. 3 Reminder the Jekyll and Hyde The spring is passing by, and it's time to pay those 1992 dues if you haven't already done so. Please check of the Long Island Flora this issue's mailing label. If the code *NP* appears, we haven't yet received your membership renewal. Dr. John Fogg, in his wonderful Wectis of Lawn Membership is $10.00 per calendar year. Make and Garden (1945) called poke (Phylolaccu nnlcricnnu checks payable to: L.I. Botanical Socicty and mail to: L.) the "Jekyll and Hyde of thc plant worltl," and Lois Lindberg, Membership revealed his horticultural disdain by suggesting "... war Welwyn Prcscrve should be declared on all suspects [sectllings hclicvcd LO Cresccnt Bcach Rd. represent poke] and they should be ruthlessly Glen Covc, NY 11542 liquidated." Knowledge gained since Dr. Fogg's 1945 If you hnvc rcceivcd a co~nplimentarynewsletter, insights has shown him to be more corrcct in his please indicalc if you would likc to remain on our assessment of the good vs. evil, yinlyang of pokc than mailing list. he could have ever expected. Arthur Cronquist Dies On March 22, 1992, Arthur Cronquist of the New York Botanical Garden died of a heart attack while working on the Intermountain Flora in Utah. The New York Botanical Garden will have a memorial service on May 5, 1992 at 11:00 a.m. For more information contact the New York Botanical Garden. If you wish to submit reminiscences of Dr. Cronquist we will gather Beyond being a garden pest, poke is dangerous.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Science Bulletin A
    PLANT SCIENCE BULLETIN A. Publication of the &tanical Societyof A.merica,Inc. VOLUME 3 JULY, 1957 NUMBER 3 Genetics, Corn, and Potato in the USSR ANTON LANG Department of Botany, Univ. of California. Los Angeles In April. 1956, the Soviet Russian government an- corn. He declared that, corn being a cross-pollinating nounced the resignation of T. D. Lysenko as president plant, inbreeding would lead to a "biological im- of the All-Union Lenin Academy of Agricultural poverishment of its genetical basis," that a "half-dead Science. This event signified theencL of the period of organism" would result, and that it would be impossible absolute domination which the so-called Soviet or to maintain inbred lines for more than 10 or 11 genera- Michurin-Lysenko genetics had enjoyed in the USSR. tions.2 He ridiculed the idea that crossing such inbreds This time therefore seemsappropriate for assessingsome could produce a superior plant. Instead, he advocated of the consequenceswhich the Lysenkoist experiment the use of varietal hybrids, asserting. in addition. that had for the USSR. The losses suffered by science can their hybrid vigor would not be limited to Fl' but be appreciated fairly easily. although it will probably would persist through F2 and Fs. take a long time before all details will be known. Any Under Lysenko's influence. breeding of hybrid corn person with some appreciation for the continuity of (in the "Western" sense) was completely abandoned scientific work can visualize how an experimental science in the USSR for more than 10 years, until 1947. when will be affected by eight years of almost total suppres- the All-Union Institute of Plant Industry (formerly sion.
    [Show full text]
  • (Simmondsia Chinensis (LINK) Schneider) to the Site of Cultivation at Egypt
    Arabian Journal of Medicinal & Aromatic Plants Response of growth and wax production of Jojoba Response of growth and wax production of Jojoba (Simmondsia Chinensis (LINK) Schneider) to the site of cultivation at Egypt. 1 2 . 1, 1 Salah M. Mahmoud , Saber F. Hendawy , Ibrahium M . F Mahmoud A. El Serafy , and Hussan A. Youssf 1 1El-Azhar Univ. Faculty of Agric, Dept of Horticulture, Nasr City Cairo, Egypt. 2Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Researches Dept., Pharmaceutical and Drug Industries Researches Division, National Research Center, Egypt Received: September 09th, 2016; Accepted: February 15th, 2017 Jojoba plant (Simmondsia Chinensis (link) Schneider), or Ho-Ho-ba or goat nut is a shrub belonging to the Simmondsiaceae family. It is well known as a useful medicinal plant and as a new crop of interest for many industrial purposes. The present study was carried out duringhe two successive seasons of 2012/ 2013 and 2013/ 2014 in private jojoba farms located as following: El-Kassasin city, El-Ismailia, Marsa Matroh, El-Sharkia, Asuite and El-Khanka governorates(Egypt). The study focused on studying the effect of the different local growing site of Egypt on the growth and wax production, and aiming to detect the best location for the suitable growing site to produce the best growth and wax yield. Nine jojoba female shrubs were selected in each farm from the growing shrubs depending on its obvious morphological growth characters and the different seeds shape and then they were marked by labels for data measurements. The monthly temperature and relative humidity average during the study seasons of culture were taken and recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Gardens in the West Indies John Parker: the Botanic Garden of the University of Cambridge Holly H
    A Publication of the Foundation for Landscape Studies A Journal of Place Volume ıı | Number ı | Fall 2006 Essay: The Botanical Garden 2 Elizabeth Barlow Rogers: Introduction Fabio Gabari: The Botanical Garden of the University of Pisa Gerda van Uffelen: Hortus Botanicus Leiden Rosie Atkins: Chelsea Physic Garden Nina Antonetti: British Colonial Botanical Gardens in the West Indies John Parker: The Botanic Garden of the University of Cambridge Holly H. Shimizu: United States Botanic Garden Gregory Long: The New York Botanical Garden Mike Maunder: Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Profile 13 Kim Tripp Exhibition Review 14 Justin Spring: Dutch Watercolors: The Great Age of the Leiden Botanical Garden New York Botanical Garden Book Reviews 18 Elizabeth Barlow Rogers: The Naming of Names: The Search for Order in the World of Plants By Anna Pavord Melanie L. Simo: Henry Shaw’s Victorian Landscapes: The Missouri Botanical Garden and Tower Grove Park By Carol Grove Judith B. Tankard: Maybeck’s Landscapes By Dianne Harris Calendar 22 Contributors 23 Letter from the Editor The Botanical Garden he term ‘globaliza- botanical gardens were plant species was the prima- Because of the botanical Introduction tion’ today has established to facilitate the ry focus of botanical gardens garden’s importance to soci- The Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries widespread cur- propagation and cultivation in former times, the loss of ety, the principal essay in he botanical garden is generally considered a rency. We use of new kinds of food crops species and habitats through this issue of Site/Lines treats Renaissance institution because of the establishment it to describe the and to act as holding opera- ecological destruction is a it as a historical institution in 1534 of gardens in Pisa and Padua specifically Tgrowth of multi-national tions for plants and seeds pressing concern in our as well as a landscape type dedicated to the study of plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Flower and Floral Trichome Morphology of Species of Dyckia Schult. F
    Acta Botanica Brasilica - 31(1): 29-41. January-March 2017. doi: 10.1590/0102-33062016abb0335 Flower and fl oral trichome morphology of species of Dyckia Schult. f. (Bromeliaceae, Pitcairnioideae), and their importance to species characterization and genus taxonomy Jordano Dorval Tavares de Carvalho¹, Liliana Essi² and João Marcelo Santos de Oliveira³* Received: September 10, 2016 Accepted: December 15, 2016 . ABSTRACT Th is paper presents a morphological analysis of the fl ower and fl oral trichomes of three rare species of Dyckia: Dyckia ibicuiensis, D. polyclada and D. racinae. Flowers at anthesis were collected from natural populations and subjected to morphometric and microscopic analysis. Among the most representative features for Dyckia are: morphometrics of individual fl oral parts; the general confi guration of the androecium and gynoecium; the degree of fusion of the stigmatic lobes; the morphology of the ovules, especially in relation to the chalazal appendix; and the presence and constitution of peltate trichomes in the perianth, which exhibited a polymorphism not previously reported for Dyckia. Th e characters were eff ective at describing each species, proposing phylogenetic inferences and recognizing infrageneric groupings. We propose two species groups, which are consistent with previous hypotheses about the relationships among the species of the genus. Th e objective of this study was to provide fl oral morphological data useful for characterizing these three rare species, delimiting the genus and forming phylogenetic hypotheses. Keywords: androecium, Dyckia, Encholirium, fl oral morphology, gynoecium, peltate trichome, perianth, Pitcairnioideae Introduction taxon, morphological studies of diff erent fl ower organs have allowed for inferences of evolutionary, systematic, ecological and physiological orders in diverse genera of the Morphological and anatomical studies using diff erent family (Varadarajan & Brown 1988; Brown & Gilmartin approaches have provided effective instruments for 1989; Brown & Terry 1992; Sajo et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Littleleaf Boxwood Scientific Name: Buxus Microphylla Order
    Common Name: Littleleaf Boxwood Scientific Name: Buxus microphylla Order: Euphorbiales Family: Buxaceae Description Littleleaf boxwood has a flat, thin, green leaf. The leaf is about 2 ½ inches long in most cases. The leaf has no hair and being the plant is an evergreen it stays green year around. Littleleaf boxwood produces a very small clumped to gather flowers. The flowers are similar to that of most grasses and are generally unnoticeable. It contains both female and male parts so it can reproduce without pollination from another plant located nearby. From the flower a very small fruit is produced. The fruit when matured has a green color and smaller than a dime. The fruit from the littleleaf boxwood is shaped much like an acorn and is very dry. The fruit is undesirable to birds, squirrels, and other small animals. Growth Habit Littleleaf boxwood is a woody shrub it can range from 3-10 Feet tall. It is not found in the wild and is grown as a shrub hedge so is often kept trimmed back. Littleleaf boxwood has a brown bark that does not flack. The plant does not have thorns as most plants do especially in the immature stage so it is a good use around the home. The diameter of the trunk does not exceed the size of a coffee mug. Under its leafy exterior are many small tangled branches can be found growing mangled. Hardiness Zone(s) Littleleaf boxwood originated from the continent of Asia. According to the USDA Boxwood Report, littleleaf boxwood grows best in USDA zones 7, 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Notes Careers Meetings Botany Resources
    Agriboard Agriboard, lumber substitutes made from plant fibers, are revolutionizing how plant wastes are used and has potential for far ranging impact on agriculture, forestry and conservation. Typing agriboard into a search engine brings up nearly 100 web pages. Three of these pages have been reviewed and are offered here for your examination. The first is an in-depth report from Environmental Building News, Vol. 4 (No. 3) and offers an excellent, balanced overview on the use of wheat straw lumber in homebuilding. The second article reviewed by EBL, Environmental Building News, Vol. 4 (No. 6), is a brief commentary on this topic including reaction to use of this material by an architect. Third is an excerpt written by David Morris, from the book, 'Non-woody Fibers and the Future of Rural Economics," edited by J. Janick., discussing general use of plant fibers for building materials. This last entry is of particular interest as it discusses cellulose for construction, from non-timber sources, in a broad sense. That opens the door to using native prairie grasses and other native plant resources to provide income from restored land . This is especially important for land which would otherwise be converted to cash crops and for areas which have lain fallow for several years but recently lost set aside status. It has also been pointed out that most areas loosing set aside status are eligible for organic certification. Production of agriboard fiber has potential to stand alone or easily dovetail with organic agriculture to aid conservation. MKVZant Return to Home Page Southern Illinois University Carbondale / Ethnobotanical Leaflets / URL: http://www.siu.edu/~ebl/ Last updated: 17-May-98 / du Ethnobotanical Leaflets Journal Contents Back Issues Book Reviews Research Notes Careers Meetings Botany Resources Inclusive Herbaria EDGAR ANDERSON Missouri Botanical Garden, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Enquiry Into Plants the Causes of Plants De Historia Plantarum . Daucus
    The contributions are arranged as numbered lists for each taxonomist with the most important ones at the beginning. You don’t have to learn the complete note as it is, prepare them as shortnotes maximum 10 points for each taxonomist, choose them according to your own preference. Major Contribution of Theophrastus (372 BC to 287 BC) – Father of Botany Theophrastus was a Greek naturalist, he was student of Pluto and Aristotle. After Aristotle’s death, he inherited his library and the garden. Theophrastus is credited with having authored more than 200 works most of which survive as fragments or as quotations in the works of other authors. Two of his botanical works have survived intact, however, and are available in English translations: Enquiry into plants (1916) and The Causes of plants (1927). During his conquests, Alexander the Great made arrangements to send back materials to Athens, enabling Theophrastus to write about exotic plants such as cotton, cinnamon and bananas. His major contribution to botany are: 1. Theophrastus described about 500 kinds of plants, 2. He classified plants into four major groups: the trees, shrubs, subshrubs and herbs. 3. He recognized the differences between flowering plants and non-flowering plants, 4. He recognized the differences between dicotyledons and monocotyledons, superior ovary and inferior ovary, free and fused petals and also fruit types. 5. He was aware of the fact that many cultivated plants do not breed true. 6. Several names used by Theophrastus in his De Historia plantarum, e.g. Daucus, Crataegus and Narcissus, to name a few, are in use even today.
    [Show full text]