DOCSLIB.ORG

Pre-Feasibility Study of Sarawak-West Kalimantan Cross-Border Value Chains

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pre-Feasibility Study of Sarawak-West Kalimantan Cross-Border Value Chains MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Pre-Feasibility Study of Sarawak-West Kalimantan Cross-Border Value Chains Montague Lord and Susan Chang Asian Development Bank, Montague Lord International February 2019 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/94732/ MPRA Paper No. 94732, posted 4 July 2019 06:30 UTC PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY OF SARAWAK-WEST KALIMANTAN CROSS-BORDER VALUE CHAINS Montague Lord and Susan Chang This pre-feasibility study on Sarawak-West Kalimantan cross-border value chains covers six topics: It analyzes existing trade patterns and competitive advantages of Sarawak and West Kalimantan, as well as government objectives in promoting cross-border commercial activities. It proposes a border economic area spread over a wide geographic area that covers a network of interrelated activities and provides a fully integrated approach to the border economic area design and implementation. It identifies potential cross-border value chains that can serve as high-profile projects for the border economic area. It determines the preference orderings of project features by key stakeholders such as government and development partners, commercial entities, and the local population. It estimates the net monetary returns for the project portfolio, a cost-effectiveness analysis of the stand-alone capacity-building projects, ranks stakeholders’ non-monetary preferences, and incorporates the the preference ranking order into the project portfolio’s net monetary returns. It provides an overall program appraisal for the set of projects. Based on pre-feasibility results, it lays out a plan for implementation of the border area development program. February 2019 i The views expressed herein reflect those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization with which the authors are currently or formerly associated. ii Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures and Tables .............................................................................................. vi Map of Sarawak and West Kalimantan ......................................................................... xii Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................... xiii Abbreviations ................................................................................................................ xiv SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... xvii PART I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1. Background .......................................................................................................... 2 2. Objectives and Methodology ............................................................................... 6 3. Coverage ............................................................................................................. 11 PART II. SOCIO-ECONOMIC FEATURES ...................................................................... 17 4. Sarawak’s Structural Transformation ............................................................... 18 5. West Kalimantan’s Economic Transformation ................................................. 22 PART III. GOVERNMENT POLICIES .............................................................................. 34 6. Sarawak Public Policies ..................................................................................... 35 7. West Kalimantan Public Policies ....................................................................... 37 8. Border Crossings and Inland Port..................................................................... 40 9. West Borneo Economic Corridor ...................................................................... 48 PART IV. ANALYSIS OF TRADE .................................................................................... 51 10. Sarawak Exports................................................................................................. 52 11. West Kalimantan Exports .................................................................................. 55 12. Competitive Advantages .................................................................................... 58 PART V. TRADE MODELING AND FORECASTING ...................................................... 62 13. Modeling Trade ................................................................................................... 63 14. Forecasting Trade Benefits ............................................................................... 71 PART VI. CROSS-BORDER VALUE CHAINS ................................................................ 83 15. Aluminum ............................................................................................................ 84 16. Natural Rubber ................................................................................................... 91 17. Palm Oil ............................................................................................................... 99 18. Wood Products ................................................................................................. 106 iii 19. Fisheries ........................................................................................................... 114 20. Ship Building .................................................................................................... 122 21. Organic Agriculture .......................................................................................... 131 22. Tourism ............................................................................................................. 138 23. Medical Tourism ............................................................................................... 145 Source: Data provided by Department of Statistics Malaysia. .................................. 148 24. Higher Education and TVET............................................................................. 150 PART VII. COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 157 25. Common Assumptions .................................................................................... 158 26. Palm Oil ............................................................................................................. 160 27. Natural Rubber ................................................................................................. 168 28. Wood Products ................................................................................................. 174 29. Medical Tourism ............................................................................................... 180 30. Higher Education and TVET............................................................................. 184 PART VIII. COST EFFECTIVENESS ANAYSIS FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ....... 189 31. Approach and Summary Results .................................................................... 190 32. Aluminum: Reducing Transport Costs ........................................................... 193 33. Wood: High-Value Modular Furniture ............................................................. 195 34. Fisheries: Reducing Trade Costs .................................................................... 197 35. Shipbuilding: Upgrading Technologies .......................................................... 199 36. Organic Foods: High Value-Added Agriculture .............................................. 201 37. Tourism: Multi-Destination Travel ................................................................... 203 PART IX. PROGRAM DESIGN ...................................................................................... 205 38. Design ............................................................................................................... 206 39. Implementation ................................................................................................. 214 40. Strategic Framework ........................................................................................ 220 PART X. OVERALL MONETARIZED APPRAISAL....................................................... 223 41 Program Viability .............................................................................................. 224 PART XI. OVERALL NON-MONETARIZED APPRAISAL............................................. 230 42. Rating Project Characteristics......................................................................... 231 PART XII. EXECUTION STRATEGY ............................................................................. 236 43 Program Implementation ................................................................................. 237 ANNEX A: ECONOMETRIC MODELING OF TRADE ................................................... 241 1. Unit Root Tests ................................................................................................. 241 2. Modeling Demand Relationships in Trade ...................................................... 243 iv 3. Modeling Price-Competitiveness Effects ........................................................ 245 4. Gravity Trade Modeling .................................................................................... 246 ANNEX B: PROJECT APPRAISAL .............................................................................. 250
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PT. Kayung Agro Lestari (Austindo Nusantara Jaya Agri Group) Ketapang Regency West Kalimantan Province Indonesia
    PT. Kayung Agro Lestari (Austindo Nusantara Jaya Agri Group) Ketapang Regency West Kalimantan Province Indonesia Summary of SEIA dan HCV Report January 2014 PT. Kayung Agro Lestari – January 2014 – Summary of SEIA and HCV Report 1 Summary of SEIA and HCV Assessment Report 1. Executive Summary PT Kayung Agro Lestari (PT KAL) has obtained an “Izin Lokasi” (location permit) No. 103 Tahun 2004, dated April 26th, 2004, signed by Bupati of Ketapang, covering area of 29.400 Ha, revised by “Izin Lokasi” No. 116 Tahun 2007, dated March 22nd, 2007, covering area of 20.000 Ha, has been extended by “Izin Lokasi” No. 400 Tahun 2007, dated November 8th, 2007, covering area of 18.754,90 Ha, and has been renewed by “Izin Lokasi” No. 62 Tahun 2010, dated February 2nd, covering area of 18.800 Ha. PT KAL located in Matan Hilir Utara Sub District, Ketapang Regency, West Kalimantan Province. Scope area of this SEIA Assessment is covering Kuala Satong Village, Kuala Tolak Village, and Laman Satong Village. This assessment conducted to identify the socio-economy condition of the community, issue, problems and the impact of company existence in their area. In 2013, PT KAL hired Fahutan IPB, lead by Dr. Ir, Nyoto Santoso, MS, a RSPO approved HCV Lead Assessor, to conduct HCV and SEIS Assessment with a team of experts. Based on the result of the HCV Assessment, there is no primary forest found in the area of PT KAL. The forests that still exist are in the form of young secondary forest, underbrush. In general, founded on the HCV Assessments, HCV 1.2 area of 3.545,45 Ha, HCV 1.3 area of 3.323,47 Ha, HCV 3 area of 2.988,10 Ha, HCV 4.1 area of 3.311,93 Ha, and HCV 4.2 area of 462,49 Ha.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan
    Volume 9. No. 2 Nopember 2018 ISSN 2580 – 1058 Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan Sintang Vox Volume Nomor Halaman ISSN Nopember Edukasi 9 2 82 – 162 2580 – 1058 2018 ISSN 2580 – 1058 ISSN 2580 – 1058 SUSUNAN DEWAN REDAKSI V O X E D U K A S I JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN VOL. 9 No. 2 Nopember 2018 EDITOR IN CHIEF: Nelly Wedyawati, S.Si., M.Pd. (STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang) EDITOR: Anyan, M.Kom. (STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang) Thomas Joni Verawanto Aristo, M.Pd (STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang) REVIEWERS: Dr. Hilarius Jago Duda, S.Si., M.Pd. (STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang) Herpanus, S.P., M.A., Ph.D (STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang) Bintoro Nugroho, M.Si., Ph.D (Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak) Eliana Yunitha Seran, M.Pd. (STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang) Mardawani, M.Pd. (STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang) Dessy Triana Relita, M.Pd. (STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang) Alamat Redaksi Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang Kalimantan Barat Jl. Pertamina Sengkuang KM. 4 Kapuas Kanan Hulu Sintang Kalimantan Barat Kotak Pos 126, Kalbar, Hp/Telp. (0565) 2025366/085245229150/085245847748) Website:http://jurnal.stkipsintang.ac.id/indek.php/voxedukasi Email: [email protected]/[email protected] ISSN 2580 – 1058 ISSN 2580 – 1058 V O X E D U K A S I JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN VOL. 9 No. 2 Nopember 2018 DAFTAR ISI FUNGSI KODE DALAM PROGRAM ACARA “BELETER” TVRI KALBAR Mai Yuliastri Simarmata 82–90 Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia,
    [Show full text]
  • Pontianak Statement on Human Rights and Agribusiness in South East Asia
    PONTIANAK STATEMENT ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND AGRIBUSINESS IN SOUTH EAST ASIA The 75 participants in this conference, drawn from the National Human Rights Institutions (NHRI) from South East Asia, UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, the Executive Office of the President, the Government of Indonesia and from supportive civil society, indigenous representatives and international organisations, including from Nepal, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines and Thailand, met in Pontianak in West Kalimantan, Indonesia, between the 11th and 12th October 2017, to consider ways of ensuring State and Non-State actors respect, protect, fulfil and remedy human rights in the agribusiness sector. The meeting included representatives from Golden Agri-Resources, Asia Pulp and Paper and Sime Darby. The meeting was hosted by the National Human Rights Commission of Indonesia (KomnasHAM), Pusaka and LinkAR- Borneo, with the support of the Forest Peoples Programme. This meeting has been convened at a time when international concern about the human rights violations, land grabs and environmental destruction associated with the rapid expansion of agribusiness, especially in South East Asia, has reached new heights. New standards are emerging on the responsibilities of consumers, retail, manufacturers, traders and processors to trace their supply chains and ensure products do not embody malpractice. Discussions have begun at the UN on an international treaty on the extra-territorial obligations of host countries and transnational corporations. Civil society is drawing greater attention to corruption in land allocation for plantations and to the exploitation of workers, migrants, women and children on estates, and to the significant dangers faced by Human Rights Defenders working to secure community and indigenous rights.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Summary Report of SEIA and HCV Assessments on PT Kartika Prima
    Summary Report of SEIA and HCV Assessments on PT Kartika Prima Cipta Districts of Semitau, Suhaid, and Selimbau of Kapuas Hulu Regency, West Kalimantan Executive Summary PT Kartika Prima Cipta (hereinafter referred to as “PT KPC”) is located in Districts of Semitau, Suhaid and Selimbau of Kapuas Hulu Regency, West Kalimantan. Its business has already obtained a Location Permit by virtue of Kapuas Hulu Regent’s Decree No. 16 Year 2007 dated 23 January 2007, granting the company a concession over a total area of ±20,000 hectares. This decree’s period was extended by virtue of Kapuas Hulu Regent’s Decree No. 302 Year 2012 dated 01 October 2012, granting PT KPC a concession of ±19,200 hectares. An Environmental Impact Assessment document (“EIA”) has been prepared by a consulting firm, namely CV Intergraha Citra, which has also been authorised by Kapuas Hulu Regent based on Decree No. 290 Year 2006 on Environmental Feasibility of Oil Palm Plantation Activities of PT Kartika Prima Cipta in Semitau, Suhaid and Selimbau of Kapuas Hulu Regency. PT KPC already has a Social Impact Assessment (“SIA”) document in its possession, internally prepared by PT Smart, Tbk.’s team of five headed by Mr Yosaphat Ardhilla Renato, S.Ant, which has already been registered under RSPO Approved High Conservation Value (“HCV”) Assessors and acknowledged as individuals having specific skills on socio-economic and cultural matters, as well as conflict resolution. PT KPC has already conducted a High Conservation Value (“HCV”) assessment in its concession. Based on the HCV assessment, there are eight (8) HCV types identified as existing within the management unit’s concession, namely HCV 1 (HCV 1.1, HCV 1.2 and HCV 1.3); HCV 2 (HCV 2.3), HCV 3, HCV 4 (HCV 4.1 and HCV 4.3), and HCV5), making together a total HCV area of 7,514.49 hectares.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary School Services Quality in Border Area of Indonesia – Malaysia
    Proceedings of International Conference “Internationalization of Islamic Higher Education Institutions Toward Global Competitiveness” Semarang, Indonesia – September 20th - 21th, 2018 Paper No. B-37 Primary School Services Quality in Border Area of Indonesia – Malaysia Retnowati WD Tuti1, Mawar2, Nida Handayani3, Muhammad Sahrul4 Faculty Of Social And Political Science Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract - The highest quality services in Elementary School of Border Area of Indonesia – Malaysia, found in Sekayam District, Sanggau Regency, West Kalimantan Province, namely Paus-22, a State Elementary School. Within an hour, new student enrolment can be fulfilled its quota in that school. The research analysis uses Parasuraman's opinions with the following indicators: Tangibles, Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance and Emphaty. Research Approach ; Qualitative, with Descriptive Method. Data Collection Techniques : Interview, observation, and documentation. Informant Selection Techniques: Purposive. Data Analysis using Miles and Huberman. Data Validity Test with Triangulation. Discussion: Primary Schools in Priority Locations should receive great attention from the Regional Government and from the Central Government, because competing directly with schools from neighbouring country Malaysia, and quality must be maintained. Research results: Tangibles: new classrooms assisted by the Government through e-Takola, but there are no libraries and official resident, lack of teaching aids; Reliability: Lack of teacher’s training, Responsiveness: responsive, Assurance: trusted by the community; Emphaty: people empathize with teachers. Conclusion: Learning services are quite good, facilities and infrastructure services need to be improved. Recommendation: Local government should: Increase cooperation between SKPD (Dinas PU and Dinas Pendidikan Kebudayaan); Exploring the company's CSR; Inviting Universities for Community Services and Internships.
    [Show full text]
  • PT Sinar Sawit Andalan, West Kalimantan Province, Indonesia
    SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLANS Proposed New Plantings by PT Sinar Sawit Andalan, West Kalimantan Province, Indonesia February 2020 1 Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ 5 List of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................... 7 1. OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................ 8 1.1. Maps of the project area ............................................................................................................ 10 1.2. General Description of the Landscape ........................................................................................ 22 1.3. Proposed Areas for New Plantings ............................................................................................. 23 2. ASSESSMENT PROCESSES AND METHODS .............................................................................................. 27 2.1. SEI Assessment ............................................................................................................................ 27 2.2. HCV Assessment .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Factors Affecting Food Productivity Improvement in Kalimantan Using Nonparametric Spatial Regression Method
    Modern Applied Science; Vol. 13, No. 11; 2019 ISSN 1913-1844 E-ISSN 1913-1852 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Identification of Factors Affecting Food Productivity Improvement in Kalimantan Using Nonparametric Spatial Regression Method Sifriyani1, Suyitno1 & Rizki. N. A.2 1Statistics Study Programme, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia. 2Mathematics Education Study Programme, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia. Correspondence: Sifriyani, Statistics Study Programme, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia. E-mail: [email protected] Received: August 8, 2019 Accepted: October 23, 2019 Online Published: October 24, 2019 doi:10.5539/mas.v13n11p103 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v13n11p103 Abstract Problems of Food Productivity in Kalimantan is experiencing instability. Every year, various problems and inhibiting factors that cause the independence of food production in Kalimantan are suffering a setback. The food problems in Kalimantan requires a solution, therefore this study aims to analyze the factors that influence the increase of productivity and production of food crops in Kalimantan using Spatial Statistics Analysis. The method used is Nonparametric Spatial Regression with Geographic Weighting. Sources of research data used are secondary data and primary data obtained from the Ministry of Agriculture
    [Show full text]
  • “Why Our Land?” Oil Palm Expansion in Indonesia Risks Peatlands and Livelihoods WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS “Why Our Land?” Oil Palm Expansion in Indonesia Risks Peatlands and Livelihoods WATCH “Why Our Land?” Oil Palm Expansion in Indonesia Risks Peatlands and Livelihoods Copyright © 2021 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-909-4 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org JUNE 2021 ISBN: 978-1-62313-909-4 “Why Our Land?” Oil Palm Expansion in Indonesia Risks Peatlands and Livelihoods Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 6 To the Government of Indonesia .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Inauguration of SPBKB Way Tenong As the Fourth AKR's
    For Immediate release May 11, 2018 The Inauguration of SPBKB Way Tenong as The Fourth AKR’s Distributor Agency of Petroleum One Price West Lampung, 11 May 2018 - On May 11, 2018, Downstream Regulatory Agency for Oil and Gas (BPH Migas) together with the Directorate General of Oil and Gas and the Regent of Lampung Barat, inaugurated SPBKB AKR Way Tenong, West Lampung District, as the Distribution Agency of One Petroleum Price Policy. The inauguration was attended by The Head of BPH Migas, Mr. M. Fanshurullah Asa; Director of Oil and Gas Downstream Business Development, Mrs. Yuli Rachwati, SH.; Director of Petroleum BPH Migas, Mrs. Ir. Setyorini Tri Hutami; Regent of West Lampung, Mr. H. Parosil Mabsus; Director of PT AKR Corporindo Tbk ("AKR") Mr. Bambang Soetiono Soedijanto; representatives of West Lampung District Government and other official representatives. As the part of AKR's participation in running the Petroleum One Price Policy Program from Government, which has been instructed by President of Republic of Indonesia, Mr. Joko Widodo, AKR is actively developing the distributor agencies in several areas. The operation of SPBKB Way Tenong become the 4th Distribution Agency of One Petroleum Price for AKR. Previously, AKR has established and operated 3 outlets SPBKB which functioned as Distribution Agency of One Petroleum Price in Bengkayang, Sanggau, and Ketapang, - West Kalimantan Province. Currently AKR is still completing the licensing and construction of 5 outlets as Distributor Agencies for One Petroleum Price in 3T (The most Underdeveloped, The Frontest, and The Outermost) areas for 2018, 1 outlet of SPBKB in Lampung Province will be in West Coast District and 4 outlets in West Kalimantan Province will be in Landak Regency, Bengkayang Regency, Sintang Regency, and Melawi Regency.
    [Show full text]
  • Fulfillment of Teacher Protection Rights
    Legal Reconstruction in Indonesia Based on Human Right Anual Program of International Conference Fulfillment Of Teacher Protection Rights Yenny AS, Rini Setiawati Faculty of Law, Universitas Panca Bhakti Pontianak [email protected], [email protected] Abstract In the implementation of the educational process, the school can be said as a second home for students, so the figure of the teacher in the school can be said to be a parent figure for the students in the school environment. Teachers as one of the most important figures in the world of education, in reality, still do not get protection, especially optimal legal protection from the government, where empirical facts show that there are still no handling mechanisms when problems occur between students / parents / families and teachers in carrying out their professional duties. The obligation to provide legal protection to teachers in carrying out their professional duties, especially placed on the government, both the central government and regional governments. This study examines what efforts can be made by the Government in accommodating the fulfillment of the right to get equitable legal protection to teachers. Through descriptive analytical research methods with a sociological juridical approach and data collection techniques carried out by interviews and focused discussions obtained research results that to provide fair legal protection requires a legal reconstruction in the Law on Teacher Protection that mandates every Local Government needs to form an institution which has the role of carrying out a policy of preventing and dealing with teacher problems in carrying out his profession by establishing a mechanism to handle it comprehensively by involving several interested parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Unlocking the Potential Economic in Undeveloped Regency Through Maritime Infrastructure
    UNLOCKING THE POTENTIAL ECONOMIC IN UNDEVELOPED REGENCY THROUGH MARITIME INFRASTRUCTURE (CASE STUDY: REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING OF NORTH KAYONG REGENCY) Imanuddin ABDULGANI, [email protected], Gadjah Mada University ABSTRACT The North Kayong Regency is one of the new Regency in West Kalimantan Province that is still lack of infrastructure development such as infrastructure and public amenities. The purpose of this research is to contribute in regional development planning policy through determine appropriate method in maritime infrastructure for increasing regional economic growth. Our study shows that the best practice to improve the development planning process is improve better and appropriate policies that might be apply through the new methods on practice oriented, focus on strategies, tools and manage the utilization of planning and resources. By maintain strategies, develop solution that integrates different dimension of regional planning and resources in every conceivable way to solve the problem and to overcome the obstacles. Keyword : Economic Growth, Maritime Infrastructure, Interconnectivity, Regional Development Planning, Undeveloped Regency INTRODUCTION The Maritime Infrastructure and its benefit for Development can not be implemented optimally, since there is regulation that the use of maritime infrastructure must follow the order of the Ministry of Transportation and Provincial Agency for Transportation which supplemented by the Provincial Spatial Plan (RTRW). The challenge is that the maritime infrastructure is not always coincident with the administrative area so as to allow synergies between agencies can not run harmoniously and produce no real technical action. For example, making a grand design of a regional sea port development can have a different direction of environmental function with a land allocation which is arranged in the Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW).
    [Show full text]
  • Dirty Plan Behind Palm Oil Bill
    POSITION PAPER Dirty Plan behind Palm Oil Bill Position Paper WALHI | 1 A. Introduction Palm oil plantation is a plantation plant In accordance with WALHI record, 21 out commodity which is the biggest in terms of 28 Regional offices have done advocacy of its land use in Indonesia. In accordance for monoculture plantation, which has to Directorate General of Plantation, the caused conflict and significant ecological Ministry of Agriculture data, there are damages. Furthermore, the Agricultural 11,672,861 hectares of palm oil plantation Reform Consortium (KPA)1 noted that there areas; while Corruption Eradication were 450 agricultural conflicts throughout Commission (KPK) states that the total area 2016. According to the conflict record, 163 of palm oil plantation in Indonesia is 15.7 conflicts (36.22%) happened in plantation million hectares. Based on KPK data, only sector dominated by the expansion of 28.03% of such palm oil plantation is owned palm oil plantation. Most of the palm oil by the community; the other 3.14% is owned plantation conflict includes the overlapping by State Owned Enterprise and 68.83% is with the people management land and due under private investment control. Such space to functional shifting of the forest and forest controlling condition obviously represents area causing the loss or damage on living the domination of palm oil plantation in sources of the community. Indonesia by Investment. The relation between conflict and releasing The dominating investment situation over forest area is shown from the total area of palm oil plantation in Indonesia has in fact forest being shifted for its function.
    [Show full text]