DOCSLIB.ORG

1 OLIVER R. GOODENOUGH ADDRESSES Academic: Home: Vermont Law School 18 Golf Avenue 164 Chelsea Street Woodstock, VT 05091 So

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 OLIVER R. GOODENOUGH ADDRESSES Academic: Home: Vermont Law School 18 Golf Avenue 164 Chelsea Street Woodstock, VT 05091 So OLIVER R. GOODENOUGH ADDRESSES Academic: Home: Vermont Law School 18 Golf Avenue 164 Chelsea Street Woodstock, VT 05091 South Royalton, Vt 05068 802 457 4627 (home) 802 831 1231 https://olivergoodenough.com/ [email protected] [email protected] Business: Skopos Labs, Inc. 802 356 7946 (cell) [email protected] ACADEMIC AND RESEARCH AFFILIATIONS Current Affiliations: VERMONT LAW SCHOOL, South Royalton, Vermont. Research Professor, 2019- ; Professor of Law, 1996-2018; Associate Professor, 1993-1996; Assistant Professor, 1992-1993; Director, Center for Legal Innovation, 2013-2018; Director of Scholarship, 2008-2013. Member VLS Dean Search Committee, 2011-2012; Chair, Curriculum Committee, 2012 – 2013, 2016-2018; Chair, Curriculum Innovation Working Group, 2013; Member, Strategic Planning Committee, 2015-2016; Faculty Representative to the Board of Trustees, 2015-2016. https://www.vermontlaw.edu/directory/person/goodenough-oliver STANFORD UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL, CODEX CENTER FOR LEGAL INFORMATICS, Palo Alto, California. Affiliated Faculty, 2015- . CodeX Insurance Initiative; Legal Specification Protocol project; Sabbatical research projects (2015) included computational contracts and the application of computation to law more generally. https://law.stanford.edu/directory/oliver-goodenough/ GRUTER INSTITUTE FOR LAW AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, Portola Valley, California. Research Fellow, 1994- ; Planning and Programming Committee, Chair, 2000- ; Member 1997-2000; Co-Director Education and Outreach Program, MacArthur Foundation Law and Neuroscience Project 2007-2011. 1 DARTMOUTH COLLEGE, THAYER SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, Hanover, New Hampshire. Adjunct Professor, 2006- ; Visiting Professor, 2004-2006; Subject: Law, Technology and Entrepreneurship: Intellectual Property, Transactions, and Finance. https://engineering.dartmouth.edu/people/faculty/oliver-goodenough. UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA, Pavia, Italy. Affiliated Researcher/Fellow, 2013- ; Cariplo Foundation project on “Innovating Legal Studies and Practice.” QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON, SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, CENTRE FOR GLOBALIZATION RESEARCH, London, England. Visiting Fellow, 2007- Past Affiliations: UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, Burlington, Vermont. Lecturer, 2015-2019. Subject: Business Law for Entrepreneurs. https://www.uvm.edu/business/profiles/oliver_goodenough DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, OFFICE OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH, Washington, DC. IPA Researcher and Visiting Fellow, 2013-2014, 2016-2017; Classification and automation of financial instruments project; research on FinTech and Blockchain applications. LEXISNEXIS, New York, New York. Member, Law School Publishing Advisory Board, 2014 – 2016. HARVARD UNIVERSITY, BERKMAN CENTER FOR INTERNET & SOCIETY, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Faculty Associate, 2014 - 2015; Faculty Fellow, 2007- 2014; Co-Director, Law Lab, 2008 – 2014. Research Projects include digital firm formation, structures of cooperation, digital institutions, use of digital formats to improve legal services for innovators and entrepreneurs, review of cloud computing regulation, ICAAN governance, and legal education for digitized practice. THE MACARTHUR FOUNDATION RESEARCH NETWORK OF LAW AND NEUROSCIENCE, Vanderbilt University Law School, Nashville, Tennessee. Associate Network Member and Senior Director of Education and Outreach. 2012-2014. CHARITÉ, HUMBOLDT-UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN, Berlin, Germany. Visiting Professor at the Neurological Department, 2003-2006; Research program on Moral Judgement, Legal Reasoning and the Sense of Justice. 2 UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE, Cambridge, England. Visiting Research Fellow, Department of Zoology, 1999-2000; Visitor, Faculty of Law, 1991, 1999-2000; Associated Visitor, Downing College, 1991, 1999-2000 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW SCHOOL, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Lecturer in Law, 1988-1991. Subjects: Entertainment Law LEGAL PRACTICE, LEGAL SERVICE PROVIDERS AND CONSULTANCY Current Affiliations SKOPOS LABS, INC (Originally PredictGov, Inc.). Co-Founder, Director, V.P. and Secretary, of startup company applying artificial intelligence to legal and governmental analysis, 2016 - ; see https://www.skoposlabs.com/ Past Affiliations GRAVEL & SHEA, Burlington, Vermont. Special Counsel, 2018 - 2021. KAY & BOOSE, LLP (and predecessors Kay Collyer & Boose and Fulop & Hardee), New York, New York. Of Counsel, 1991-2003; Partner, 1986-1990; Associate, 1981-1986 CLEARY, GOTTLIEB, STEEN & HAMILTON, New York, New York. Associate, 1978-1981 EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, J.D. cum laude, 1978 HARVARD UNIVERSITY, Cambridge, Massachusetts, B.A. magna cum laude, 1975 GROTON SCHOOL, Groton, Massachusetts, Diploma cum laude, 1971 EDITORSHIPS AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES SSRN INNOVATION IN LEGAL EDUCATION EJOURNAL, Co-Editor with Rebecca Purdom, 2013 - LEXISNEXIS LAW SCHOOL ADVISORY BOARD, Member, 2014 - 2016 SSRN LAW & NEUROSCIENCE EJOURNAL, Co-Editor with Amanda Pustilnik, 2010 - 2012 3 LEXISNEXIS GLOBAL LEGAL INNOVATION BOARD, Member, 2010 - 2011 PRIZES AND AWARDS Vermont Law School Richard Brooks Faculty Scholarship Prize, given to a faculty member who has consistently exhibited the highest standards of scholarship, announced January 2010 for the 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 academic years Gruter Institute Bene Merenti Award, for outstanding achievements in law and behavioral research, June, 2002 Lee Loevinger Jurimetrics Research Award, awarded April, 2000 for Mapping Cortical Areas Associated with Legal Reasoning and with Moral Intuition LEGISLATION AND LEGISLATIVE REPORTS Financial Technology and Blockchain Legislation: Principal author of Financial Technology Report, prepared for the Vermont General Assembly by the Center for Legal Innovation of Vermont Law School in consultation with the Commissioner of the Department of Financial Regulation, the Secretary of the Agency of Commerce and Community Development, and the Attorney General of the State of Vermont, December 7, 2017, available at https://legislature.vermont.gov/assets/Legislative-Reports/Vermont-Report-Final-Version- December-7.pdf, and contributing drafter to Vermont S. 269, proposed legislation in the 2018 session, which would implement many of the suggestions of that report. See https://legislature.vermont.gov/bill/status/2018/S.269 Blockchain Enabling Legislation: Service on the Blockchain Study Committee mandated by the Vermont Legislature in the 2015 session. The Committee’s report, produced in January, is available at: http://legislature.vermont.gov/assets/Legislative-Reports/blockchain-technology- report-final.pdf . The Legislature considered the legislation proposed in the report and with some amendment it was adopted. The final version of the bill is available at http://legislature.vermont.gov/assets/Documents/2016/Docs/BILLS/H-0868/H- 0868%20As%20Passed%20by%20Both%20House%20and%20Senate%20Official.pdf . The blockchain provisions are Section I.I at page 307 et seq. Advisor to the Nevada Secretary of State: Assembly Bill 564, An Act to Regulate Business Associations, adopted in Nevada 2011. Available at http://leg.state.nv.us/Session/76th2011/Bills/AB/AB564_EN.pdf 4 Collaborating Author: Digital Nonprofit Corporations, enacted by Vermont in 2010 as part of S.288, §§ 23-38. Collaborating Author: Digital Corporations Legislation, enacted by Vermont in 2008 as part of H.888, effecting several provisions of the Vermont law of business organizations. See reports at http://www.inc.com/magazine/20080701/a-haven-for-virtual-companies.html Principal Author: Foreign Law Limited Liability Company Legislation, enacted 2004 at Vermont Statutes Title 11: Corporations, Partnerships and Associations, Chapter 21: Limited Liability Companies, §§ 3181-3184. GRANTS Major participation in the application for and administration of the following grant funded projects and events: Gordon Getty gift to the Vermont Law School to support the research and writing of a book on leadership and institutions in the 21st Century, 2019, $106,000. Ewing Marion Kaufman Foundation grant to Vermont Law School to support the Legal Specification Project, 2017-2018, $22,000 Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation grant to the Gruter Institute and Vermont Law School for the 2015 Legithon project. 2015. $75,000 Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation grant to the Gruter Institute, Innovation Ecosystem Research Project, 2014-2017. $160,000 Google Research Grant to the Vermont Law School. Unrestricted award to support the work of Oliver Goodenough in connection with automating governance processes. February, 2013. $30,000. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation grant to the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University as a follow-on grant for completing projects in the legal laboratory network, approved January, 2012. $200,000 Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation grant to the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University for establishing a legal laboratory network. July 1 2008 - December 31, 2010. Helped prepare proposal, served as co-Managing Director of the Project. $2,800,000 5 Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation grant to the Gruter Institute for Law and Behavioral Research for the conference Legal Institutions and Entrepreneurship at the Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University. February 8-9, 2008. Co-organizer and moderator. Approx. $50,000 John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation grant to the University of California at Santa Barbara to fund the Law and Neuroscience Project, July 2007 - June 2010. Helped
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evolution, Politics and Law
    Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 38 Number 4 Summer 2004 pp.1129-1248 Summer 2004 Evolution, Politics and Law Bailey Kuklin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Bailey Kuklin, Evolution, Politics and Law, 38 Val. U. L. Rev. 1129 (2004). Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol38/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Valparaiso University Law Review by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Kuklin: Evolution, Politics and Law VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW VOLUME 38 SUMMER 2004 NUMBER 4 Article EVOLUTION, POLITICS AND LAW Bailey Kuklin* I. Introduction ............................................... 1129 II. Evolutionary Theory ................................. 1134 III. The Normative Implications of Biological Dispositions ......................... 1140 A . Fact and Value .................................... 1141 B. Biological Determinism ..................... 1163 C. Future Fitness ..................................... 1183 D. Cultural N orm s .................................. 1188 IV. The Politics of Sociobiology ..................... 1196 A. Political Orientations ......................... 1205 B. Political Tactics ................................... 1232 V . C onclusion ................................................. 1248 I. INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Presumption of Innocence: Procedural Rights in Criminal Proceedings Social Fieldwork Research (FRANET)
    Presumption of Innocence: procedural rights in criminal proceedings Social Fieldwork Research (FRANET) Country: GERMANY Contractor’s name: Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte e.V. Authors: Thorben Bredow, Lisa Fischer Reviewer: Petra Follmar-Otto Date: 27 May 2020 (Revised version: 20 August 2020; second revision: 28 August 2020) DISCLAIMER: This document was commissioned under contract as background material for a comparative analysis by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) for the project ‘Presumption of Innocence’. The information and views contained in the document do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the FRA. The document is made publicly available for transparency and information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or legal opinion. Table of Contents PART A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 1 PART B. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 4 B.1 PREPARATION OF FIELDWORK ........................................................................................... 4 B.2 IDENTIFICATION AND RECRUITMENT OF PARTICIPANTS ................................................... 4 B.3 SAMPLE AND DESCRIPTION OF FIELDWORK ...................................................................... 5 B.4 DATA ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lost in the Compromise: Free Speech, Criminal Justice, and Attorney Pretrial Publicity
    LOST IN THE COMPROMISE: FREE SPEECH, CRIMINAL JUSTICE, AND ATTORNEY PRETRIAL PUBLICITY Margaret Tarkington* INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1874 I. PREVIOUS APPROACHES ...................................................... 1878 A. The Supreme Court and Attorney Pretrial Publicity ......................................................... 1878 B. The Compromise Between Fair Trials and the First Amendment ................................................... 1881 1. The Model Rules and the ABA ............................ 1881 2. Applying In-Court Restrictions to Extrajudicial Speech ............................................. 1883 3. Freedman and Starwood’s Non-Compromise ...... 1884 C. The First Amendment Strongly Protects Attorney Pretrial Publicity .......................................... 1884 D. Structural Signaling ..................................................... 1885 E. Ignoring the First Amendment Problem ...................... 1886 II. THE ACCESS-TO-JUSTICE THEORY OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT ....................................................................... 1887 III. REPRESENTATION IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM .................................................................. 1890 A. Heightened Constitutional Significance of Life and Liberty ....................................................... 1891 B. Obligations to Undertake and Continue the Representation ............................................................. 1892 C. Duty Not to Disclose Information
    [Show full text]
  • Dissemination of Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter and Its Countermeasures
    Dissertation Dissemination of Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter and Its Countermeasures Christine Chen This document was submitted as a dissertation in March 2021 in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the doctoral degree in public policy analysis at the Pardee RAND Graduate School. The faculty committee that supervised and approved the dissertation consisted of Luke Matthews (Chair), Sarah Nowak and Jeremy Miles. The external reader was Jennifer Golbeck. This dissertation was generously supported by the Anne and James Rothenberg Dissertation Award. PARDEE RAND GRADUATE SCHOOL For more information on this publication, visit http://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSDA1332-1.html Published 2021 by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. is a registered trademarK Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademarK(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is reQuired from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help maKe communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND MaKe a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Abstract Outbreaks of vaccine preventable diseases have continued to affect many parts of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download
    CONTENTS Preface xxiii Acknowledgments xxvii CHAPTER ONE THE “IDEAL” ORGANIZATION 1 How organizations are supposed to run (in theory) Chapter Objectives 1 Key Terms 1 Introduction 2 Max Weber and Bureaucracy 2 Characteristics of Bureaucracy 3 Law in the Real World: The Blockbuster Movie 6 Jobs vs. Careers 7 Law in the Real World: Steve Jobs and Apple, Inc. 8 Professional Associations and Organizations 9 Control of Workers and Management Styles 10 McDonaldization of Organizations 12 Law in the Real World: Southwest Airlines 14 Labor Markets 15 Laws and Regulation in Organizations 16 Law in the Real World: California’s SB 1342 17 Summary 18 Case Study: Keeping Employees Happy: Twitter® 19 Glossary 21 References and Suggested Readings 23 ix Contents CHAPTER TWO HOW ORGANIZATIONS REALLY RUN 25 What can go wrong that can lead to white collar or corporate crime Chapter Objectives 25 Key Terms 25 Introduction 26 Defining Malfeasance and White Collar Crime 27 Fear and Greed 28 Iron Cage of Bureaucracy 29 Chain of Command Issues 31 Innovation 32 Law in the Real World: Challenger Shuttle Disaster 32 Bounded Rationality 33 Ceremonial Evaluations 34 Leadership Gone Haywire: The Autocrat and Micromanager 35 Alienated Workers 36 Law in the Real World: The U.S. Postal Strike, 1970 37 Irrationality of McDonaldization 39 Gender Politics 40 Whistleblowers 40 Law in the Real World: Jeffrey Wigand and Big Tobacco 42 Unforeseen Disasters 44 Law in the Real World: Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) Bankruptcy 46 Corporate Violence 47 Organizational Death 48 Summary 49 Case Study: What Happens in Hollywood (and New York) Doesn’t Necessarily Stay in Hollywood: The Weinstein Scandal 50 Glossary 55 References and Suggested Readings 57 x Contents CHAPTER THREE WHAT YOU KNOW VS.
    [Show full text]
  • Innocent Until Proven Guilty?
    Innocent until proven guilty? The presentation of suspects in criminal proceedings Innocent until proven guilty? About Fair Trials Fair Trials is a global criminal justice watchdog with offices in London, Brussels and Washington, D.C., focused on improving the right to a fair trial in accordance with international standards. Fair Trials’ work is premised on the belief that fair trials are In Europe, Fair Trials coordinate the Legal Experts one of the cornerstones of a just society: they prevent lives Advisory Panel (LEAP) – the leading criminal justice from being ruined by miscarriages of justice and make network in Europe consisting of over 200 criminal defence societies safer by contributing to justice systems that law firms, academic institutions and civil society maintain public trust. Although universally recognised in organisations. More information about this network and its principle, in practice the basic human right to a fair trial is work on the right to a fair trial in Europe can be found at: being routinely abused. www.fairtrials.org/legal-experts-advisory-panel. @fairtrials @fairtrials Fair Trials fairtrials.org Suspects in Restraints This report is produced as part of the project “The Importance of Appearances: How Suspects and Accused Persons are Presented in the Courtroom, in Public and in the Media”, coordinated by the Hungarian Helsinki Committee (the “Project”) with partners Aditus Foundation (Malta), Fair Trials, Human Right House, Zagreb (Croatia), Mérték (Hungary), Rights International Spain, and the University of Vienna. Contact: Laure Baudrihaye-Gérard Alex Mik Senior Lawyer (Europe) Campaigns & Networks Director +32 (0)2 894 99 55 +32 (0)2 895 59 42 [email protected] [email protected] Illustrations: Darya Novatorova With thanks to Hogan Lovells, our pro bono partner, without whose time, expertise, Project coordinated by global network of offices and commitment, the Hungarian Helsinki Committee the global survey of law and practice in this report would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Shaming Revisited: an Essay for Bill Klein
    University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law 2005 Corporate Shaming Revisited: An Essay for Bill Klein David A. Skeel Jr. University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Repository Citation Skeel, David A. Jr., "Corporate Shaming Revisited: An Essay for Bill Klein" (2005). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 692. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/692 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law by an authorized administrator of Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Corporate Shaming Revisited: An Essay For Bill Klein David A. Skeel, Jr.t Introduction ...................................................................................................... 107 I. What "Shaming" Means and How It Works ............................................. 108 II. The "Tone at The Top" and Shaming within the Firm ............................. 110 III. The Wall Street Perp Walk ....................................................................... 112
    [Show full text]
  • Language and Jury Decision-Making in Texas Death Penalty Trials
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Doing Death in Texas: Language and Jury Decision-Making in Texas Death Penalty Trials Author: Robin Helene Conley Document No.: 236354 Date Received: November 2011 Award Number: 2009-IJ-CX-0005 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Doing Death in Texas: Language and Jury Decision-Making in Texas Death Penalty Trials A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Robin Helene Conley 2011 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natures of Universal Moralities, 75 Brook
    Brooklyn Law Review Volume 75 Issue 2 SYMPOSIUM: Article 4 Is Morality Universal, and Should the Law Care? 2009 The aN tures of Universal Moralities Bailey Kuklin Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr Recommended Citation Bailey Kuklin, The Natures of Universal Moralities, 75 Brook. L. Rev. (2009). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr/vol75/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Law Review by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. The Natures of Universal Moralities Bailey Kuklin† One of the abiding lessons from postmodernism is that reason does not go all the way down.1 In the context of this symposium, one cannot deductively derive a universal morality from incontestible moral primitives,2 or practical reason alone.3 Instead, even reasoned moral systems must ultimately be grounded on intuition,4 a sense of justice. The question then † Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School. I wish to thank the presenters and participants of the Brooklyn Law School Symposium entitled “Is Morality Universal, and Should the Law Care?” and those at the Tenth SEAL Scholarship Conference. Further thanks go to Brooklyn Law School for supporting this project with a summer research stipend. 1 “Simplifying to the extreme, I define postmodern as incredulity toward metanarratives.” JEAN-FRANCOIS LYOTARD, THE POSTMODERN CONDITION: A REPORT ON KNOWLEDGE xxiv (Geoff Bennington & Brian Massumi trans., 1984). “If modernity is viewed with Weberian optimism as the project of rationalisation of the life-world, an era of material progress, social emancipation and scientific innovation, the postmodern is derided as chaotic, catastrophic, nihilistic, the end of good order.” COSTAS DOUZINAS ET AL., POSTMODERN JURISPRUDENCE 16 (1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Hoaxers, Hackers, and Policymakers How Junk Science Persuaded the FBI to Divert Terrorism Funding to Fight Hackers
    SI M-A 2006 pgs cut 1/23/06 2:50 PM Page 31 Hoaxers, Hackers, and Policymakers How Junk Science Persuaded the FBI to Divert Terrorism Funding to Fight Hackers Hoaxers warned of an imminent and deadly electronic Pearl Harbor. Consequently, the FBI diverted resources and attention away from terrorism and toward fighting hackers. This may have contributed to the September 11, 2001, attacks. Use of critical inquiry and the scientific method could have avoided this misdirection. CAROLYN MEINEL SKEPTICAL INQUIRER March / April 2006 31 SI M-A 2006 pgs cut 1/23/06 2:50 PM Page 32 Stir into this media frenzy a feud between Louis Freeh, the eginning in late 1996, Fred J. Villella, calling himself head of the FBI, and President Clinton’s terrorism and cyber- the former “executive secretary to the national secu- space czar, Richard A. Clarke (Freeh 2005). Consequently, rity adviser,” squired “Dr. Mudge” and “Se7en,” to Freeh habitually froze Clarke out of the loop. All Clarke could Bmeetings where they warned federal policymakers of a loom- have known about Maiffret’s supposed al Qaeda adventure was ing electronic Pearl Harbor (Richtel 1998, Radcliff 1998). what he saw in the news. Their adventures appeared in many news stories, and for good Even other parts of the FBI had little or no knowledge of reason. This was back when the Internet and the Dot Com what was going on. Department of Justice regulations known revolution were big and scary and most people had no idea as “The Wall” kept agents who worked the foreign intelligence what it all meant.
    [Show full text]
  • Arrest and Protest
    Printed using recycled fiber Guinea Fowl Page 24 Middleburg’s Only Locally Owned and Operated Newspaper Volume 7 Issue 9 www.mbecc.com December 16, 2010 ~ January 27, 2011 Christmas in Middleburg Arrest and Protest Page 12 Dan Morrow mors, and on-line speculation on the eve of Christmas in Middleburg, Council Member he December regular meeting of the Kathy Jo Shea added an amendment to the Middleburg Town Council opened last item on the Council’s regular December with Mayor Betsy Davis praising meeting agenda. In addition to discussing a Middleburg Eccentric Editor Dee routine appointment to a Town committee, Dee Hubbard for her leadership role in this the Council would also discuss the actions Tyear’s “Christmas in Middleburg” celebra- of the Town’s Police Chief on or around No- tion, and ended with a closed-session dis- vember 30. cussion of the role of the Middleburg Po- The Charges lice Chief, Steve Webber, in her arrest by State Police, her “perp walk”, and transport The Hubbard case is rooted in com- in irons to the County Detention Center in plaints of embezzlement lodged with the Leesburg. Middleburg Police by Jack J. Goehring of Hubbard, 67, had been called to a McLean, Virginia. meeting in a local restaurant on Novem- For roughly twenty years Hubbard ber 30 by Police Chief Webber, ostensibly had managed some 20 to 25 properties, in- to talk about traffic and security prepara- cluding private homes, offices, and retail tions for the December 4 “Christmas in stores, for Goehring and a partner John Ben- Middleburg” parade which she has nison.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen Jay Gould Papers M1437
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt229036tr No online items Guide to the Stephen Jay Gould Papers M1437 Jenny Johnson Department of Special Collections and University Archives August 2011 ; revised 2019 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Guide to the Stephen Jay Gould M1437 1 Papers M1437 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: Stephen Jay Gould papers creator: Gould, Stephen Jay source: Shearer, Rhonda Roland Identifier/Call Number: M1437 Physical Description: 575 Linear Feet(958 boxes) Physical Description: 1180 computer file(s)(52 megabytes) Date (inclusive): 1868-2004 Date (bulk): bulk Abstract: This collection documents the life of noted American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and historian of science, Stephen Jay Gould. The papers include correspondence, juvenilia, manuscripts, subject files, teaching files, photographs, audiovisual materials, and personal and biographical materials created and compiled by Gould. Both textual and born-digital materials are represented in the collection. Preferred Citation [identification of item], Stephen Jay Gould Papers, M1437. Dept. of Special Collections, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, Calif. Publication Rights While Special Collections is the owner of the physical and digital items, permission to examine collection materials is not an authorization to publish. These materials are made available for use
    [Show full text]