DOCSLIB.ORG

Simplified Steps to Heterologous Prime-Boost HIV Vaccine Development?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Simplified Steps to Heterologous Prime-Boost HIV Vaccine Development? Simplified steps to heterologous prime-boost HIV vaccine development? Nelson L. Michael J Clin Invest. 2019;129(11):4572-4573. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI132440. Commentary The RV 144 HIV vaccine efficacy study showed a reduction in HIV-1 infection risk in Thai volunteers who received two priming vaccinations of vCP1521 ALVAC (attenuated recombinant canarypox virus expressing HIV group–specific antigen, polymerase, and envelope genes) followed by two additional ALVAC vaccinations and coadministration of purified bivalent gp120 proteins (AIDSVAX B/E). In this issue of the JCI, Rouphael et al. build on these results by substituting a DNA plasmid cocktail expressing HIV-1 subtype C group–specific antigen, polymerase, and envelope antigen genes (DNA-HIV-PT123) for ALVAC in a phase 1b safety and immunogenicity study. The results indicate that the vaccine regimen is safe, elicits promising cross-subtype humoral and cellular responses, and opens up potentially simplified approaches to HIV-1 vaccine development. Find the latest version: https://jci.me/132440/pdf COMMENTARY The Journal of Clinical Investigation Simplified steps to heterologous prime-boost HIV vaccine development? Nelson L. Michael Center for Infectious Diseases Research, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA. replaced in the current study by a cocktail of three DNA plasmids, DNA-HIV-PT123, The RV 144 HIV vaccine efficacy study showed a reduction in HIV-1 which consists of equal amounts of plas- infection risk in Thai volunteers who received two priming vaccinations of mids expressing HIV-1 subtype C sequenc- vCP1521 ALVAC (attenuated recombinant canarypox virus expressing HIV es: HIV-1 gag, HIV-1 gp140, and group–specific antigen, polymerase, and envelope genes) followed by two ZM96 ZM96 HIV-1CN54 pol-nef, delivered at a total dose additional ALVAC vaccinations and coadministration of purified bivalent of 4 mg administered intramuscularly via gp120 proteins (AIDSVAX B/E). In this issue of the JCI, Rouphael et al. build needle and syringe. on these results by substituting a DNA plasmid cocktail expressing HIV-1 Subjects in the first study arm (T1) subtype C group–specific antigen, polymerase, and envelope antigen genes were primed with AIDSVAX B/E fol- (DNA-HIV-PT123) for ALVAC in a phase 1b safety and immunogenicity study. lowed by DNA boost without coadminis- The results indicate that the vaccine regimen is safe, elicits promising cross- tration, and subjects in the second study subtype humoral and cellular responses, and opens up potentially simplified arm (T2) received the same vaccines, but approaches to HIV-1 vaccine development. in reversed order (2). Thus, T2 includes the use of the AIDSVAX B/E boost at the month 3 and month 6 vaccination visits after priming with a DNA-based vaccine, as was done in RV 144. In the third study Attempting to improve a regimen in the benchmark RV 144 study arm (T3), subjects were given DNA-HIV- vaccination strategy with included ALVAC vCP1521, which expresses PT123as the prime at the first and second demonstrated efficacy HIV-1LAI gag/pol sequences (subtype B) along vaccination visits followed by coadminis- The Thai HIV vaccine efficacy trial RV 144 with HIV-192TH023 gp120 env (subtype circu- tration of DNA-HIV-PT123 and AIDSVAX evaluated an approach that combined an lating recombinant form 1_AE [CRF_01AE]) B/E at the third and fourth vaccination vis- ALVAC vCP1521 (a canarypox-vectored HIV with a partial extension into the transmem- its. The T3 arm was the most homologous expressing group-specific antigen, poly- brane domain of gp41, and was given four to the RV 144 regimen, which used vCP121 merase, and envelope antigen–encoding times (at baseline and then at months 1, 3, ALVAC vaccinations at all four vaccination genes [gag/pol/env]) prime with an AIDS- and 6). AIDSVAX B/E, which is composed visits and coadministration of AIDSVAX VAX B/E (bivalent gp120 monomeric Env of purified gp120 Env proteins from HIV-1MN B/E (albeit in different anatomical loca- protein) heterologous boost (1). To date, this (subtype B) and HIV-1A244 (subtype CRF01_ tions) at the third and fourth vaccination prime-boost regimen is the only strategy AE) variants adsorbed to alum, was given at visits. The fourth study arm (T4) included that has demonstrated efficacy in prevent- the same time as ALVAC vCP1521 in sepa- coadministration of DNA-HIV-PT123 and ing HIV acquisition in humans; however, the rate injections in the ipsilateral deltoid mus- AIDSVAX B/E at all four vaccination visits. overall protection was relatively modest (1). cle of volunteers at months 3 and 6. Immunogenicity was broadly assessed by In this issue, Rouphael et al. extend upon the The study design of Rouphael and Rouphael et al., and their analysis includ- RV 144 trial and evaluated the effect of sub- colleagues included four independent ed HIV-1 Env antibody binding stratified stituting a DNA vaccine for ALVAC vCP1521 arms with vaccinations given at 0, 1, 3, by IgG subclass and V1V2 scaffold bind- in four study arms of a phase 1, randomized, and 6 months (2). AIDSVAX B/E was ing, neutralizing antibody (nAb) assays, double-blinded, placebo-controlled safe- administered in the same dose and route and antibody-dependent cell-mediated ty and immunogenicity study performed as was used in RV 144; however, the cytotoxicity (ADCC). Cellular immuni- at multiple study centers (2). The vaccine ALVAC vCP1521 boost used in RV 144 was ty was assessed by intracellular cytokine staining and the computational biolo- gy–based T cell polyfunctional assay, the Related Article: p. 4769 combinatorial polyfunctionality analysis of single cells (COMPASS) assay. Notably, Conflict of interest: The author has declared that no conflict of interest exists. measures of cellular immunity were found Disclaimer: Material has been reviewed by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. There is no objection to its to correlate with risk of HIV infection in presentation and/or publication. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the author, and are not to be construed as official, or as reflecting true views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense. RV 144 (3) three years after the V1V2 anti- Copyright: © 2019, American Society for Clinical Investigation. body signal was originally identified as Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2019;129(11):4572–4573. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI132440. the primary correlate of reduced risk of 4572 jci.org Volume 129 Number 11 November 2019 The Journal of Clinical Investigation COMMENTARY HIV-1 infection in RV 144 (4). Rouphael et (9), and other infectious diseases of public Research, 503 Robert Grant Avenue, Sil- al. did not observe any significant reacto- health importance. ver Spring, Maryland 20910, USA. Phone: genicity to any of the vaccine treatments Second, Rouphael and colleagues have 301.319.7312; Email: nelson.l.michael2. in the study volunteers, implying a favor- defined a pathway to build on the only HIV [email protected]. able safety profile. DNA-HIV-PT123 prim- vaccine study to date associated with signs ing appeared to provide similar immune of clinical efficacy using a genetic vaccine 1. Rerks-Ngarm S, et al. Vaccination with ALVAC responses compared to those seen with type that is far more readily available to a and AIDSVAX to prevent HIV-1 infection in Thai- ALVAC vCP1521 priming in RV 144 (4). wide range of investigators than the devel- land. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(23):2209–2220. Early coadministration of vaccines, as opment of complex viral vectors that are fre- 2. Rouphael NG, , et al. DNA priming and gp120 in the T4 arm, was superior in terms of quently restricted by manufacturer protec- boosting induces HIV-specific antibodies the kinetics of development of Env- and tion of their product development portfolios. in a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(11):4769–4785. V1V2 scaffold–binding antibodies, nAbs While individual DNA plasmid expression 3. Gottardo R, et al. Plasma IgG to linear epi- able to neutralize tier 1 viruses, which are backbones may also be constrained by these topes in the V2 and V3 regions of HIV-1 gp120 relatively easy to neutralize, and ADCC. provisions, the general availability of these correlate with a reduced risk of infection in Together, the results of this trial provide vectors allows for a broader base of inves- the RV144 vaccine efficacy trial. PLoS ONE. three important lessons for the field of tigator-initiated preclinical studies (10), 2013;8(9):e75665. 4. Haynes BF, et al. Immune-correlates analysis HIV vaccine development. directly underpinning the vital innovation of an HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trial. N Engl J Med. that comes from academic investigators. 2012;366(14):1275–1286. Lessons learned and future Third, while many in the field remain 5. Rolland M, et al. Increased HIV-1 vaccine effica- directions skeptical about the possibility that HIV cy against viruses with genetic signatures in Env First, Rouphael et al. effectively contrasted vaccines that fail to elicit potent, broadly V2. Nature. 2012;490(7420):417–420. 6. Zolla-Pazner S, Gilbert PB. Revisiting the differences in immunogenicity between cross-reactive nAbs could ever be an effec- the correlate of reduced HIV infection the RV 144 regimen and correlates of risk of tive public health tool to control the HIV risk in the Rv144 vaccine trial. J Virol. infection from Haynes et al. (4), viral sieve pandemic, additional approaches to drive 2019;93(17):e00629-19. analysis first reported by Rolland et al. (5), heterologous prime-boost vaccines that gen- 7. Korber B, Hraber P, Wagh K, Hahn BH. Polyva- and the gravamen of the work done from erate both functional T cell (11) and nonneu- lent vaccine approaches to combat HIV-1 diver- sity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HIV Vaccine Development: the Importance of Gp120 Variable Loop
    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Biology and Microbiology Graduate Students Plan B Research Projects Department of Biology and Microbiology 2020 HIV Vaccine Development: The Importance of Gp120 Variable loop 3 for the survival of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus and the Potency of the Neutralizing Antibody to bind to the Variable Loop 3 Riham Hussien Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/biomicro_plan-b Part of the Biology Commons, and the Microbiology Commons 1 HIV Vaccine Development: The Importance of Gp120 Variable loop 3 for the survival of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus and the Potency of the Neutralizing Antibody to bind to the Variable Loop 3 Riham Hussien Master’s in human biology South Dakota State University Dr.Greg Heiberger 3/27/2020 2 Table of Content Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………………… 3 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………….…….....4 The Variable Loops …………………………………………………………………………..5 Gp120 fusion and Variable Loop 3 structure/interaction with Cell’s Co-receptors …………6 The Development of Broadly neutralizing antibodies………………………………………7 Challenges of V3 neutralizing antibodies …………………………………………………..8 V1/V2 masking V3 loop …………………………………………………………………….8 N-glycosylation of gp120 and V3 loop cause the resistance of the neutralizing antibodies …9 Recent Neutralizing Antibodies targeting V3 Loop ……………………………………….12 10A37 and 10A3 ……………………………………………………………………………..12 The breadth and Potency of the Anti-V3 Loop neutralizing antibodies Vaccine Trials …......13 Vaccine Trials…………………………………………………………………………………16 RV144/ Future Course …………………………………………………………………….16,19 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………19 Acknowledgments ……………………………………………………………………………23 References …………………………………………………………………………………….24 3 Abstract The tendency for the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) to proliferate and mutate it’s trimeric envelop (Env), is one of the reasons why it’s a challenge for an antibody-based vaccine to be developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Key Factors Confronting HIV Vaccine Development George K
    PERSPECTIVE PERSPECTIVE Antibody persistence and T-cell balance: Two key factors confronting HIV vaccine development George K. Lewis1, Anthony L. DeVico, and Robert C. Gallo1 Division of Basic Science and Vaccine Research Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201 Edited by Anthony S. Fauci, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD, and approved September 5, 2014 (received for review July 21, 2014) The quest for a prophylactic AIDS vaccine is ongoing, but it is now clear that the successful vaccine must elicit protective antibody responses. Accordingly, intense efforts are underway to identify immunogens that elicit these responses. Regardless of the mechanism of antibody- mediated protection, be it neutralization, Fc-mediated effector function, or both, antibody persistence and appropriate T-cell help are significant problems confronting the development of a successful AIDS vaccine. Here, we discuss the evidence illustrating the poor persistence + of antibody responses to Env, the envelope glycoprotein of HIV-1, and the related problem of CD4 T-cell responses that compromise vaccine efficacy by creating excess cellular targets of HIV-1 infection. Finally, we propose solutions to both problems that are applicable to all Env- based AIDS vaccines regardless of the mechanism of antibody-mediated protection. HIV | vaccine | antibody persistence | AIDS | Tcell HIV vaccine development presents unprece- 17). A large body of data points toward a role exhibited efficacy. The protection was mod- dented challenges on multiple levels, a reality, for antibody responses to the HIV envelope est, with an overall of efficacy 31.2% (21) in often overlooked, that cannot be overstated.
    [Show full text]
  • A Media Handbook for HIV Vaccine Trials for Africa Acknowledgements
    A Media Handbook for HIV Vaccine Trials for Africa Acknowledgements The Media Handbook for HIV Vaccine Trials for Africa was written by Yinka Adeyemi with guidance and direction from Bunmi Makinwa of the department of Policy, Strategy and Research, Dr Jose Esparza, Dr Saladin Osmanov, Claire Pattou, and Coumba Touré of the World Health Organization (WHO)/Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), HIV Vaccine Initiative. We would like to acknowledge the following individuals for their valuable comments and contributions to this handbook: Dr Alashle Abimiku, Dr Omu Anzala, Dr Carlos Arnaldo, Dr Courtney Batholomew, Janet Frohlich, Dr D. A. Gangakhedar, Dr Rodney Hoff. Patrick Jabani, Bachi Karkaria, Dr Tom LaSalvia, Dr Chewe Luo, Nebat Mbewe, Dr Rosemary Musonda, Binod Mahanty, Dr Roy Mugerwa, Ronaldo Mussauer de Lima, Omololu Falobi, Otula Owuor, Kirk Pereira, Dr John Rwomushana, Mario Scheffer, Jaya Shreedhar, Judith Soal, Dr Prasert Thongcharoen, Kathy Ann Waterman and Victor Zonana. The section on Communication and vaccine trials in Thailand (Appendix 1) is based on a UNAIDS report by Nusara Thaitawat, while that on Communication issues in vaccine trials in Uganda (Appendix 2) is based on a UNAIDS report by Ann Fieldler. The section on Communication and preparations for HIV vaccine trials in Kenya (Appendix 3) is by Otula Owuor. A number of fictitious people and organizations are used for illustrative purposes within the text. Any reference to actual persons or organizations is purely coincidental. UNAIDS/01.05E (English original, February 2001) ISBN 92-9173-021-1 © Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS The designations employed and the presentation of the (UNAIDS) 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase III HIV Vaccine Trial—Thailand
    HIV Vaccine Efficacy Trials; Lessons and Opportunities for Future Research Hannah Kibuuka Makerere University Walter Reed Project, Uganda INTEREST Conference Harare, Zimbabwe Outline . Need for an HIV Vaccine . Efficacy Trials up to date . Lessons from failed Efficacy trials and opportunities for Research . Lessons form RV 144 and P5 follow up studies Before After vaccines vaccines Vaccines work really well! Vaccines are among the most successful medical interventions (eradicated or controlled smallpox, polio, measles…) A Vaccine Is Essential to End AIDS Potential impact of an AIDS vaccine as part of the UNAIDS Enhanced Investment Framework (IFE) Cumulative infections 2.000.000 avoided 2027-70 Current Trend 42.7M Current Trend + Vaccine* 1.500.000 50% Scale-up 27.1M 1.000.000 50% Scale-up + Vaccine* New Infections with HIV HIV with Infections New 500.000 IFE 16.2M IFE + Vaccine* 0 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 2065 2070 * Illustrative vaccine with an assumed efficacy of 70%, not representative of any specific candidate. Coverage in generalized epidemics: routine 10 years old 70%, catch-up 11-14 years old 60%, 15-17 years old 55%, 18-49 years old 50%; in high risk populations in concentrated epidemics: 50% Modeling project – UNAIDS, Futures Institute, IAVI, AVAC [funded by USAID] 3 Need….. Several new prevention measures have been realized in the last few years. Although efficacious, the interventions are faced with potential challenges of access and adherence . HIV vaccine has potential to address some of these
    [Show full text]
  • HPV Vaccination to Prevent HIV Infection: Time for Randomized Controlled Trials Maarten F
    COMMENTARY HPV Vaccination to Prevent HIV Infection: Time for Randomized Controlled Trials Maarten F. Schim van der Loeff, MD, PhD,*† Alan G. Nyitray, PhD,‡ and Anna R. Giuliano, PhD‡ Despite many years of rigorous evaluation of a variety of interventions, HIV incidence rates in parts of Africa remain unacceptably high. A recent review identified 37 randomized controlled trials testing interventions to reduce HIV incidence.1 Except for 3 randomized controlled trials of male circumcision2–4 and 1 trial of syndromic treatment of sexually transmitted diseases,5 and, recently, 1 trial of a vaginal microbicide,6 no significant reductions in HIV incidence were observed. In some trials of vaginal microbicides, trial participants in the active treatment arm actually had increased HIV incidence rates.7 Trials with candidate vaccines have been equally disappointing.8 A recently completed trial of a prime-boost strategy conducted in Thailand showed statistically significant, but limited, protection against HIV.9 Nevertheless, even vaccine optimists think that a preventive HIV vaccine is many years away. Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) were identified as important cofactors for HIV trans- mission early in the epidemic.10,11 Many prospective observational studies showed that the presence of ulcerative and nonulcerative STIs increased the likelihood of HIV transmission.10,11 Several interventions were based on this observation including mass treatment with antibiotics,12 improved syndromic management of STIs,5,13 and herpes simplex virus (HSV)-2 suppressive treatment.14 Null findings of these interventions should be interpreted with caution. Failure to show an effect does not necessarily mean that the STI is not causally associated with HIV.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Vaccine Type on HIV-1 Vaccine Elicited Antibody Durability
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Impact of vaccine type on HIV‑1 vaccine elicited antibody durability and B cell gene signature Rohith Palli1,2,15, Kelly E. Seaton3,15, Michael S. Piepenbrink4, John Hural5, Paul A. Goepfert4, Fatima Laher6, Susan P. Buchbinder7, Gavin Churchyard8, Glenda E. Gray6,9, Harriet L. Robinson10, Yunda Huang5, Holly Janes5,11, James J. Kobie4, Michael C. Keefer12, Georgia D. Tomaras3 & Juilee Thakar13,14* Efcacious HIV‑1 vaccination requires elicitation of long‑lived antibody responses. However, our understanding of how diferent vaccine types elicit durable antibody responses is lacking. To assess the impact of vaccine type on antibody responses, we measured IgG isotypes against four consensus HIV antigens from 2 weeks to 10 years post HIV‑1 vaccination and used mixed efects models to estimate half‑life of responses in four human clinical trials. Compared to protein‑boosted regimens, half‑lives of gp120‑specifc antibodies were longer but peak magnitudes were lower in Modifed Vaccinia Ankara (MVA)‑boosted regimens. Furthermore, gp120‑specifc B cell transcriptomics from MVA‑boosted and protein‑boosted vaccines revealed a distinct signature at a peak (2 weeks after last vaccination) including CD19, CD40, and FCRL2‑5 activation along with increased B cell receptor signaling. Additional analysis revealed contributions of RIG‑I‑like receptor pathway and genes such as SMAD5 and IL‑32 to antibody durability. Thus, this study provides novel insights into vaccine induced antibody durability and B‑cell receptor signaling. While vaccine-elicited antibody durability has been achieved for licensed vaccines such as yellow fever, measles, smallpox, and Hepatitis B, elicitation of long-lived, functional antibody responses with candidate HIV-1 vac- cine regimens remains elusive1,2.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Drawn from Recent HIV Vaccine Efficacy Trials
    SUPPLEMENT ARTICLE Lessons Drawn From Recent HIV Vaccine Efficacy Trials Jonathan D. Fuchs, MD, MPH,*† Magda E. Sobieszczyk, MD, MPH,§ Scott M. Hammer, MD,§ and Susan P. Buchbinder, MD*†‡ has not delivered one. A recently completed vaccine efficacy Abstract: A safe and effective HIV vaccine is needed to curtail the trial has inspired new hope that an HIV vaccine is US and global epidemics. However, the search for one has been achievable. Here we describe how the results from these elusive despite more than 25 years of focused research. Results from large clinical studies, some unexpected, are driving vaccine the RV144 Thai efficacy trial have renewed hope that a vaccine may discovery. We also outline important lessons about data protect against HIV acquisition. We can draw several scientific and analysis, dissemination, and recruitment of communities operational lessons from RV144 and other recent tests-of-concept at risk. efficacy trials. Here we describe how trial results, some unexpected, highlight the fundamental role these clinical studies play in HIV vaccine discovery. These trials also teach us that transparency in data HIV VACCINE EFFICACY TRIALS TO DATE analysis and results dissemination can yield substantial rewards and Since the first gp160 vaccine entered clinical testing in that efforts to engage communities, particularly those most heavily 1987, more than 150 trials of different vaccine candidates have affected by the epidemic, are needed to augment research literacy and been conducted.2 These trials reflect 3 distinct waves of trial recruitment. Future efficacy trial designs may incorporate novel, vaccine development, including approaches designed to elicit partially effective prevention strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Vaccine Fact Sheet.Qxd
    can an HIV vaccine make a difference? why do we need an HIV vaccine? revised 1/04 accines are among the most powerful and cost-effective disease prevention tools Vavailable. A vaccine that could prevent HIV infection or stop progression of the disease would greatly help in the fight against the AIDS pandemic. Vaccines have been pivotal in worldwide smallpox elimination efforts, have nearly eliminated polio and have drastically ays who? reduced the incidence of infectious diseases like measles and pertussis in the US. S A crucial question is whether a vaccine based on one strain of HIV would be effective for 1. National Institute of Allergy and populations in which a different strain is predominant. There are also questions about how Infectious Diseases. Challenges an HIV vaccine would protect individuals: the vaccine might not be able to actually in designing AIDS vaccines. May prevent infection, but could prevent or delay progression to disease, or simply reduce the 2003. www.niaid.nih.gov/ infectiousness of people who do become infected with HIV. factsheets/challvacc.htm HIV prevention education and counseling are important components of vaccine programs. Even after the release of a vaccine, there will be an ongoing need for effective behavioral 2. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy prevention programs. An HIV vaccine will not be a “magic bullet” but it could play an Coalition. Understanding the extremely powerful role as part of a package of prevention interventions. results of the AIDSVAX trial. May 2003. www.avac.org/pdf/ UnderstandingAIDSVAX.pdf has progress been made? 3. VaxGen Announces Results of its Phase III HIV Vaccine Trial in wenty-two years into the epidemic, researchers are still struggling with the daunting Thailand: Vaccine Fails to Meet Tscientific challenges involved in HIV vaccine research: 1) traditional approaches to Endpoints.
    [Show full text]
  • HIV Vaccines in Canada
    The Global Effort Some progress has been made in the global effort to find an HIV vaccine. Advances in molecular biolo- gy and basic HIV research have led to the develop- ment of promising strategies. Some experimental 1 vaccines have shown the ability to protect non- human primates from infection by a virus closely related to HIV. A number of candidate vaccines HIV have been shown to be safe in small-scale (Phase I Vaccines and II) clinical trials and to trigger HIV-specific in Canada immune responses. Some people repeatedly exposed to HIV resist infection and mount HIV specific immune responses, which provides important clues for the design of an effective HIV vaccine. There is a growing scientific consensus that an effective HIV vaccine is possible. Since 1987, when the first HIV vaccine trial was conducted, about 30 candidate vaccines have been tested in approximately 60 phase I/II clinical trials, Current State involving more than 10,000 healthy human volun- teers. Two candidate vaccines are undergoing large-scale (Phase III) efficacy evaluation in North of HIV Vaccine America, the Netherlands, and Thailand. The final results from these trials are expected in 2003. A Phase III trial of another candidate vaccine is Research scheduled to start in early 2003 in Thailand, with results expected by 2007. This info sheet reviews the state of HIV vaccine research No precise figures are available on the amount globally and in Canada as of March 2002. of money being spent on HIV vaccine research globally, but estimates range from $US 450 to 600 million a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Advances' Insights
    Health Advances’ Insights: SI Technology (formerly called “Core Shell”) • Single Injection (SI) technology has multiple applications and potential for huge impact • Prioritization according to technical fit and unmet clinical need is essential to de-risked development – 50 vaccines were screened • Rabies is the best first application and model drug for building out the technology platform • Strong technical fit and unmet need in low-and-middle-income-countries (LMICs) • Convert the lab scale process into commercially viable process with rabies before moving to more technically challenging, larger impact applications • WHO Pre-Qualification helps make vaccines accessible in LMICs • Requires regulatory approval in US, Europe, India or other WHO designated countries 1 Table of Contents Content Slide # Source Disclaimer 3 Particles for Humanity Executive Summary 4-13 Health Advances Priority Applications 14-39 Health Advances • Rabies • Meningococcus • HPV • HIV/AIDS Other Applications 40-63 Health Advances • Polio • Malaria • Hepatitis A • Group B Strep Regulatory Process 64-72 Health Advances Appendix: Vaccine Market Segmentation 73-74 Health Advances 2 Disclaimer • The following deck was an independent analysis conducted by Health Advances on the potential applications of the single injection (SI) technology in 2018 and may not represent the current views of Particles for Humanity • Refer to the SI Development Plan for details regarding our team and timeline • Health Advances work 1. Examines burden of disease/ potential for impact, clinical need, value propositions, and technical fit with the technology for 50 vaccines that were screened 2. Lays out the development and regulatory pathway for applications 3 Health Advances LLC Presented to BOSTON | SAN FRANCISCO | ZUG www.healthadvances.com Particles for Humanity November 20, 2018 Background & Objectives Executive Summary • The Gates Foundation is interested in funding innovative vaccine technology platforms for the developing world.
    [Show full text]
  • Company Description Key Points Geovax Labs, Inc. GOVX-NASDAQ
    GeoVax Labs, Inc. GOVX‐NASDAQ EXECUTIVE INFORMATIONAL OVERVIEW® October 22, 2020 Company Description GeoVax Labs, Inc. (“GeoVax” or “the Company”) is a clinical‐stage biotechnology company developing preventive and therapeutic human vaccines against infectious diseases and cancer. The GeoVax Labs, Inc. Company’s proprietary GV‐MVA‐VLP™ vector vaccine technology 1900 Lake Park Drive, Suite 380 utilizes a Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vector, a large virus Atlanta, GA 30080 capable of carrying several vaccine antigens, that are expressed as Phone (678) 384‐7220 non‐infectious virus‐like particles (VLPs) in the individual receiving Fax (678) 384‐7281 the vaccine (in vivo). VLPs mimic a natural infection, stimulating both www.geovax.com the humoral and cellular arms of the immune system to recognize, prevent, and control the target infection through durable immune Ticker (Exchange) GOVX (NASDAQ) responses. GeoVax is capitalizing on the safety and efficacy of its Recent Price (10/22/2020) $3.19 technology platform to address the urgent need for a COVID‐19 Shares Outstanding* 3.8 million vaccine and is also developing vaccines against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Zika virus (ZIKV), hemorrhagic fever Market Capitalization $11.4 million (HF) viruses (Ebola, Sudan, Marburg, and Lassa Fever) and malaria. Average 3‐month Volume 377,347 Furthermore, the Company is applying its MVA‐VLP technology to Insider Ownership +>5% 6.9% cancer immunotherapy (immuno‐oncology). Institutional Ownership 25% EPS (06/30/2020)* ($0.66) Key Points Employees 8 GeoVax’s recently completed $12.8 million public offering and its * EPS figure for Q2 2020 has been restated for the 1:20 reverse uplist to Nasdaq give it the financial resources it has lacked in recent split in September 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • ALVAC®-HIV (Vcp1521) Priming at Week 0, 4, 12, 24
    Vaccine Trial Centre Established in1984 Funded by WHO on Control of Diarrhea Diseases Full operation in1986 Past 29 Years of Research Experiences • Cholera Vaccine Killed whole cell and B sub-unit oral vaccine CVD103-Hg resistant oral vaccine • Rotavirus Vaccine- Rotashield (tetravalent oral vaccine) • Poliomyelitis Vaccine (OPV & IPV) • Malaria Vaccine Varicella Vaccine • Measles Vaccine Cholera challenge-O1, O139 • WRSS1 Shigella Vaccine • HPV quadri-valent vaccine, nona- valent vaccine • H1N1 LAIV vaccine (WHO) H5N2 LAIV Vaccine (WHO) HIV Vaccine rgp 120 B, rgp 120 B/E ALVAC HIV Vaccine & rgp 120 B/E (Phase I/ II and III (RV144) RV305 RV306 Collaboration • AFRIMS – US, Thai • MHRP Military HIV Research Program • MOPH • Chulalongkorn University • Chiangmai University VTC Project Timeline 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 Projects Elderly flu vaccine RV306 GPO Avian Flu Vaccine-V02 RV305 Dengue CYD14 Dengue CYD34 V503-002 Nonavalent HPV vaccine in Preadolescents and Adolescents live attenuated influenza vaccine (PLAIV) V503-001 Nonavalent HPV vaccine Safety, Immunogenicity and Efficacy Studies of WRSS1 Measurement of Anogenital Wart Burden and Cost of Illnesses Herpes Zoster and Post-Herpetic Neuralgia Associated Establishment of a Shigella sonnei Challenge Model for Evaluation HIV-1 CM235 env/CM240 gag/pol vaccine HIV-1 gag DNA with or without IL-12 DNA Assessing the psychosocial burden in woman with abnormal pap Efficacy of GARDASIL™ in mid adults, HPV vaccine MRKAd5 HIV-1 vaccine ALVAC-HIV vaccine + gp
    [Show full text]