Global Financial Stability Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Global Findex Database 2014
WPS7255 Policy Research Working Paper 7255 Public Disclosure Authorized The Global Findex Database 2014 Measuring Financial Inclusion around the World Public Disclosure Authorized Asli Demirguc-Kunt Leora Klapper Dorothe Singer Peter Van Oudheusden Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Development Research Group Finance and Private Sector Development Team April 2015 Policy Research Working Paper 7255 Abstract The Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) database, expand access to financial services in Sub-Saharan Africa. launched by the World Bank in 2011, provides compa- Along with these gains, the data also show that big oppor- rable indicators showing how people around the world tunities remain to increase financial inclusion, especially save, borrow, make payments, and manage risk. The 2014 among women and poor people. Governments and the edition of the database reveals that 62 percent of adults private sector can play a pivotal role by shifting the pay- worldwide have an account at a bank or another type of ment of wages and government transfers from cash into financial institution or with a mobile money provider. accounts. There are also large opportunities to spur Between 2011 and 2014, 700 million adults became greater use of accounts, allowing those who already have account holders while the number of those without an one to benefit more fully from financial inclusion. In account—the unbanked—dropped by 20 percent to 2 developing economies 1.3 billion adults with an account billion. What drove this increase in account ownership? pay utility bills in cash, and more than half a billion A growth in account penetration of 13 percentage points pay school fees in cash. -
The Opportunities of Digitizing Payments
THE OPPORTUNITIES OF DIGITIZING PAYMENTS How digitization of payments, transfers, and remittances contributes to the G20 goals of broad-based economic growth, financial inclusion, and women’s economic empowerment A report by the World Bank Development Research Group, the Better Than Cash Alliance, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to the G20 Global Partnership for Financial Inclusion. Prepared for the G20 Australian Presidency August 28, 2014 © 2014 International Bank for Reconstruction ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS and Development/The World Bank This report was prepared by Leora Klapper 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 and Dorothe Singer of the Finance and Private Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org Sector Development Team of the Development This work is a product of the staff of the World Research Group of the World Bank. Bank with external contributions. The findings, Inputs and guidance were received from Sheila interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of Miller of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Bank, its board of executive directors, Ruth Goodwin-Groen of the Better Than Cash or the governments they represent. Alliance (hosted by UNCDF), Mary Ellen Isk- The World Bank does not guarantee the ac- enderian of Women’s World Banking, World curacy of the data included in this work. The Bank Group experts, as well as the members boundaries, colors, denominations, and other and implementing partners of the G20 Global information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the Partnership for Financial Inclusion (GPFI), World Bank concerning the legal status of any including the Alliance for Financial Inclu- territory or the endorsement or acceptance of sion (AFI), the Consultative Group to Assist such boundaries. -
SDG Compendium Digital Financial Inclusion
IGNITING SDG PROGRESS THROUGH DIGITAL FINANCIAL INCLUSION In September 2015, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a plan of action for people, prosperity, and the planet, entitled “Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” The 2030 Agenda consists of 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), developed in collaboration with a wide range of stakeholders globally and endorsed by all United Nations (UN) member states. The SDGs embody humanity’s shared aspirations and vision for the future, and faster progress is needed for them to make a difference in people’s lives. The evidence presented in this compendium identifies how digital financial inclusion can ignite faster progress toward the SDGs, and create long-lasting social and economic impact for millions of people worldwide. Are you a decision-maker in government, business, or civil society? We invite you to use this compendium to make digital financial inclusion a priority, whether it is allocating financing to build digital infrastructure, digitizing your payments, or passing regulations to ensure digital financial services can be used by everyone. The world is experiencing a digital revolution. More people than ever have access to mobile phones, the internet, and other digital services like prepaid cards, with the number growing every day. How can this digital revolution help us reach the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals more quickly? One important answer is through digital financial inclusion. Financial inclusion means affordable, effective, and safe financial services for everyone. Inclusive digital financial services refer to mobile money, online accounts, electronic payments, insurance and credit, combinations of them and newer fintech apps, that reach people who were formerly excluded. -
Deleveraging and the Aftermath of Overexpansion
May 28th, 2009 Jeffrey Owen Herzog Deleveraging and the aftermath of overexpansion [email protected] O The deleveraging process for commercial banks is likely to last years and overshoot compared to fundamentals Banking System Asset and Leverage Growth O A strong procyclical correlation exists between asset growth and Nominal Values, 1934-2008 leverage growth over the past 75 years 25% O At the level of the firm, boom times generate decreasing 20% 1942 collateralization rates and increasing average loan sizes 15% O Given two-year loan losses of $1.1tr and leverage declines of -5% 10% 2008 to -7.5%, we expect deleveraging to curtail commercial bank 5% credit by $646bn and $687bn per year for 2009-2010 0% -5% Trends in deleveraging and commercial banking over time Leverage Growth -10% 2004 -15% 1946 Deleveraging is the process whereby commercial banks reduce their ratio of -20% assets to equity capital, thus bringing down their aggregate exposure to the 0% 5% -5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% economy. Many commentators point to this process as an eventual destination -10% Asset Growth for the US commercial banking system, but few have described where or how Source: FDIC we arrive at a more deleveraged commercial banking system. Commercial Bank Assets and Equity Adjusted for Inflation by CPI, $tr Over the past seventy years, the commercial banking sector’s aggregate 0.6 6 balance sheet has demonstrated a strong positive correlation between leverage and asset growth. For the banking industry, 2004 was an 0.5 5 S&L Crisis, 1989-1991 exceptionally unusual year, with equity increasing yoy by 22%. -
List of Certain Foreign Institutions Classified As Official for Purposes of Reporting on the Treasury International Capital (TIC) Forms
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY JANUARY 2001 Revised Aug. 2002, May 2004, May 2005, May/July 2006, June 2007 List of Certain Foreign Institutions classified as Official for Purposes of Reporting on the Treasury International Capital (TIC) Forms The attached list of foreign institutions, which conform to the definition of foreign official institutions on the Treasury International Capital (TIC) Forms, supersedes all previous lists. The definition of foreign official institutions is: "FOREIGN OFFICIAL INSTITUTIONS (FOI) include the following: 1. Treasuries, including ministries of finance, or corresponding departments of national governments; central banks, including all departments thereof; stabilization funds, including official exchange control offices or other government exchange authorities; and diplomatic and consular establishments and other departments and agencies of national governments. 2. International and regional organizations. 3. Banks, corporations, or other agencies (including development banks and other institutions that are majority-owned by central governments) that are fiscal agents of national governments and perform activities similar to those of a treasury, central bank, stabilization fund, or exchange control authority." Although the attached list includes the major foreign official institutions which have come to the attention of the Federal Reserve Banks and the Department of the Treasury, it does not purport to be exhaustive. Whenever a question arises whether or not an institution should, in accordance with the instructions on the TIC forms, be classified as official, the Federal Reserve Bank with which you file reports should be consulted. It should be noted that the list does not in every case include all alternative names applying to the same institution. -
The Deleveraging of U.S. Households: Credit Card Debt Over the Lifecycle
2016 n Number 11 ECONOMIC Synopses The Deleveraging of U.S. Households: Credit Card Debt over the Lifecycle Helu Jiang, Technical Research Associate Juan M. Sanchez, Research Officer and Economist ggertsson and Krugman (2012) contend that “if there Total Credit Card Debt is a single word that appears most frequently in dis - $ Billions cussions of the economic problems now afflicting E 900 both the United States and Europe, that word is surely 858 865 debt.” These authors and others offer theoretical models 850 that present the debt phenomenon as follows: The econo my 800 788 792 756 is populated by impatient and patient individuals. Impatient 744 751 750 individuals borrow as much as possible, up to a debt limit. 718 When the debt limit suddenly tightens, impatient individ - 700 683 665 656 648 uals must cut expenditures to pay their debt, depressing 650 aggregate demand and generating debt-driven slumps. Such 600 a reduction in debt is called deleveraging . 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20 11 2012 2013 2014 2015 SOURCE: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax. Individuals younger than 46 deleveraged the most after the Share of the Change in Total Credit Card Debt financial crisis of 2008. by Age Group Percent 25 21 20 The evolution of total credit card debt around the finan - 14 14 14 15 13 11 cial crisis of 2008 appears consistent with that sequence: 8 10 6 Credit card debt increased quickly before the financial cri sis 5 1 3 3 0 and then fell for six years after that episode. -
The End of Deleveraging?
Economic Compass Global Perspectives for Investors Issue 19 • NOVEMBER 2012 HIGHLIGHTS › Some leverage is economically useful, but, the U.S. clearly took this notion too far in the 2000s. › Subsequent deleveraging has been a drag on growth over the past four years. › Importantly, the private sector has now completed deleveraging, presenting the Eric Lascelles opportunity for slightly better – or at least better quality – economic growth. Chief Economist › However, government deleveraging tends to lag the rest, and is only now RBC Global Asset Management Inc. commencing. THE END OF DELEVERAGING? The Greek physicist Archimedes may not have been referring to the economy when he said, “Give me a lever long enough Exhibit 1: Deleveraging Drags on Growth and I will move the world,” but the sentiment nonetheless rings true. Financial leveraging by banks, corporations, households DEBT CYCLE PRESENT and governments indisputably combined to buoy the global Leveraging Deleveraging economy for several decades. Business Cycle in However, this tide abruptly turned when the global financial Downswing Upswing cautious upswing crisis hit in 2008. Leveraging suddenly morphed into deleveraging. Alas, while it is beneficial for individual households to bring their finances into order by curtailing BUSINESS CYCLE consumption, this unavoidably depresses economic growth when performed en masse. This “paradox of thrift” has acted Debt Cycle still like a riptide on the global economy, dragging it away from firm deleveraging land. Source: RBC GAM The purpose of this report is to provide a clearer understanding Economically, the U.S. could manage more growth in the near for why leverage first rose, and why it is now beating a retreat. -
Credit Reallocation, Deleveraging, and Financial Crises
Credit Reallocation, Deleveraging, and Financial Crises Junghwan Hyun Raoul Minetti∗ Hiroshima University Michigan State University Abstract This paper studies how the process of reallocation of credit across firms behaves before and after financial crises. Applying the methodology proposed by Davis and Haltiwanger (1992) for measuring job reallocation, we track the dynamics of credit reallocation across Korean firms for over three decades (1980 2012). The credit − boom preceding the 1997 crisis featured a slowdown of credit reallocation. Af- ter the crisis and the associated reforms, the creditless recovery (deleveraging) masked a dramatic intensification and increased procyclicality of credit realloca- tion. The findings suggest that the crisis and the associated reforms have triggered an efficiency-enhancing increase in the fluidity of the credit market. Keywords: Credit Reallocation, Credit Growth, Financial Crises. JEL Codes: E44 ∗Raoul Minetti: Department of Economics, 486 W. Circle Drive, 110 Marshall-Adams Hall, Michi- gan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1038. E-mail: [email protected] . Junghwan Hyun: gre- [email protected] . We wish to thank several seminar and conference participants for their comments and suggestions. All remaining errors are ours. 1 Credit Reallocation, Deleveraging, and Financial Crises Abstract This paper studies how the process of reallocation of credit across firms behaves before and after financial crises. Applying the method- ology proposed by Davis and Haltiwanger (1992) for measuring job re- allocation, we track the dynamics of credit reallocation across Korean firms for over three decades (1980 2012). The credit boom preceding − the 1997 crisis featured a slowdown of credit reallocation. After the crisis and the associated reforms, the creditless recovery (deleveraging) masked a dramatic intensification and increased procyclicality of credit reallocation. -
Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for Bolivia
IMF Country Report No. 21/180 BOLIVIA 2021 ARTICLE IV CONSULTATION—PRESS RELEASE; August 2021 STAFF REPORT; AND STATEMENT BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR BOLIVIA Under Article IV of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. In the context of the 2021 Article IV consultation with Bolivia, the following documents have been released and are included in this package: • A Press Release summarizing the views of the Executive Board as expressed during its June 14, 2021 consideration of the staff report that concluded the Article IV consultation with Bolivia. • The Staff Report prepared by a staff team of the IMF for the Executive Board’s consideration on June 14, 2021, following discussions that ended on April 22, 2021, with the officials of Bolivia on economic developments and policies. Based on information available at the time of these discussions, the staff report was completed on May 27, 2021. • An Informational Annex prepared by the IMF staff. • A Statement by the Executive Director for Bolivia. The IMF’s transparency policy allows for the deletion of market-sensitive information and premature disclosure of the authorities’ policy intentions in published staff reports and other documents. Copies of this report are available to the public from International Monetary Fund • Publication Services PO Box 92780 • Washington, D.C. 20090 Telephone: (202) 623-7430 • Fax: (202) 623-7201 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.imf.org Price: $18.00 per printed copy International Monetary Fund Washington, D.C. © 2021 International Monetary Fund ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution PR21/180 IMF Executive Board Concludes 2021 Article IV Consultation with Bolivia FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Washington, DC – June 16, 2021: On June 14, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation1 with Bolivia. -
Debt Overhang and Deleveraging in the US
Working Paper Series Bruno Albuquerque and Debt overhang and deleveraging Georgi Krustev in the US household sector: gauging the impact on consumption No 1843 / August 2015 Note: This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the European Central Bank (ECB). The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the ECB Abstract Using a novel dataset for the US states, this paper examines whether household debt and the protracted debt deleveraging help explain the dismal performance of US consumption since 2007 in the aftermath of the housing bubble. By separating the concepts of deleveraging and debt overhang { a flow and a stock effect { we find that excessive indebtedness exerted a meaningful drag on consumption over and beyond income and wealth effects. The overall impact, however, is modest { around one-sixth of the slowdown in consumption between 2000-06 and 2007-12 { and mostly driven by states with particularly large imbalances in their household sector. This might be indicative of non-linearities, whereby indebtedness begins to bite only when misalignments from sustainable debt dynamics become excessive. Keywords: Household deleveraging, Debt overhang, Consumption function, Housing wealth. JEL Classification: C13, C23, C52, D12, H31 ECB Working Paper 1843, August 2015 1 Non-technical summary The leveraging and subsequent deleveraging cycle in the US household sector played a significant role in affecting the performance of economic activity in the years around the Great Recession. A growing body of theoretical and empirical studies have thus focused on explaining to what extent and through which channels the excessive build-up of debt and the deleveraging phase might have contributed to depress economic activity and consumption growth. -
Finance and Inequality SDN/20/01
January2020 I M F S T A F F D I S C U S S I O N N O T E SDN/20/01 Finance and Inequality Martin Čihák and Ratna Sahay in collaboration with Adolfo Barajas, Shiyuan Chen, Armand Fouejieu, and Peichu Xie DISCLAIMER: Staff Discussion Notes showcase policy-related analysis and research being developed by IMF staff members and are published to elicit comments and to encourage debate. The views expressed in Staff Discussion Notes are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management. FINANCE AND INEQUALITY Finance and Inequality Monetary and Capital Markets Department with input from other departments1 Prepared by Martin Čihák and Ratna Sahay in collaboration with Adolfo Barajas, Shiyuan Chen, Armand Fouejieu, and Peichu Xie Authorized for distribution by Ratna Sahay DISCLAIMER: Staff Discussion Notes showcase policy-related analysis and research being developed by IMF staff members and are published to elicit comments and to encourage debate. The views expressed in Staff Discussion Notes are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management. JEL Classification Numbers: E24, H23, H53, H55, I32, I38, O15 Keywords: banking, financial depth, financial inclusion, financial stability, economic inequality Authors’ Email Addresses: [email protected], [email protected] 1 Input from Armand Fouejieu and Shiyuan Chen (financial inclusion and inequality), Adolfo Barajas and Peichu Xie (firms’ access to finance) is gratefully acknowledged. Jerôme Vanderbussche shared data on riskiness of credit allocation. The authors want to thank—without implicating—members of the IMF’s Executive Board and IMF seminar participants, as well as Tobias Adrian, Andreas Adriano, Bidisha Das, Stefania Fabrizio, José Garrido, Florian Gimbel, Javier Hamann, Tannous Kass-Hanna, Peter Kunzel, Joshua Lipsky, David Lipton, Meera Louis, Matthew Jones, Sanjaya Panth, Jay Surti, Jarkko Turunen, Christoph Rosenberg, and Nico Valckx, for useful comments and suggestions. -
Why Was Japan Hit So Hard by the Global Financial Crisis?
ADBI Working Paper Series Why was Japan Hit So Hard by the Global Financial Crisis? Masahiro Kawai and Shinji Takagi No. 153 October 2009 Asian Development Bank Institute ADBI Working Paper 153 Kawai and Takagi Masahiro Kawai is the dean of the Asian Development Bank Institute. Shinji Takagi is a professor, Graduate School of Economics, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan. This is a revised version of the paper presented at the Samuel Hsieh Memorial Conference, hosted by the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research, Taipei,China 9–10 July 2009. The authors are thankful to Ainslie Smith for her editorial work. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each working paper (given in the citation below). Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. Suggested citation: Kawai, M., and S. Takagi. 2009. Why was Japan Hit So Hard by the Global Financial Crisis? ADBI Working Paper 153.